The present invention relates to a system and method for delivering relevant content to a wireless handset. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item based on user reaction to the content.
Services that provide ranked lists of results are well known, for example, in the areas of internet search and advertising. Such services may gauge user response to the provided content to improve the relevance of ranked results provided to the users of the service. Passive user responses, such as selection of content, manipulation of content, or time spent viewing particular content are monitored and the relevance weighting applied to the content is adjusted accordingly. Active user feedback, such as a rating provided by the user for a particular content item, is also used to impact relevance weighting for content.
User profile information such as user interest, user location, etc. has been used in existing content delivery systems to impact the relevance weighting of content. However, existing systems lack means for adjusting relevance weighting of content for a group of users having a shared profile attribute based on both active and passive user responses to received content.
Moreover, there remains a need for a content delivery system that ranks content based on the location of the user accessing the content.
A system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item is described. The system comprises a plurality of user profiles, each user profile comprising a user identification. The system further comprises a plurality of content items. An initial relevance weight value is associated with each content item. The system further comprises a network. A content delivery module is communicatively coupled to the network. The content delivery module is configured to deliver a plurality of content items to a wireless device via the network. The wireless device is configured to display the content items. A user interface disposed on the wireless device is configured to receive a feedback input associated with at least one content item and transmit the feedback input to the content delivery module. A positive review input disposed on the wireless device corresponds to a positive feedback input. A negative review input disposed on the wireless device corresponds to a negative feedback input. A relevance weight adjustment module operatively coupled to the content delivery module is configured to perform one of a subtraction operation or an addition operation. The subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a negative review is received for the content item. The addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a positive review is received for the content item.
In another embodiment, a system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item comprises a means for displaying content items.
A method for adjusting a relevance value for a content item is also described. The method comprises associating at least one attribute group with a user identification. The method further comprises associating an initial relevance weight value with a content item. A plurality of content items are delivered to a wireless device via a network. The content items are displayed on the wireless device. A user interface disposed on the wireless device receives a feedback input associated with at least one content item. The feedback input is transmitted to the content delivery module. The transmitting comprises transmitting a positive review feedback input when feedback input is received from a positive feedback input disposed on the wireless device. The transmitting further comprises transmitting a negative review feedback input when feedback input is received from a negative feedback input disposed on the wireless device. One of a subtraction operation or an addition operation are performed with a relevance weight adjustment module operatively coupled to the content delivery module. The subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a negative review is received for the content item. The addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a positive review is received for the content item.
The present invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following drawings which are for illustrative, not limiting, purposes.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description is illustrative and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the claimed subject matter will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure.
A relevance weighting system for content is described. Content items are accessible to a plurality of users having user profiles. The content items are delivered via a network to a computing device, such as a wireless handset. The user of the wireless handset may provide feedback for a content item. Based on the feedback received, a relevance weight value associated with the content item is adjusted. One or more passive measures of user response to the content item may also be used to adjust the relevance weight value associated with the content item.
According to one embodiment, when positive feedback is received, for each attribute group associated with the user, a predetermined point value is added to the relevance weight value associated with the content item. An attribute group may be any category to which a user belongs as determined from information provided by or information collected about the user, for example, a location of the user (such as a city or zip code), a user interest, an age of the user or age group to which the user belongs, and so on. Similarly, if negative feedback is received, a predetermined point value is subtracted from the content item relevance weight value for each attribute group associated with the user.
In another embodiment, when positive feedback is received, a predetermined point value is added to a content item relevance weight value for all users. Similarly, if negative feedback is received, a predetermined point value is subtracted from a content item relevance weight value for all users.
In an alternative embodiment, if a content item transmitted to one or more wireless handsets more than a predetermined number of times without being selected, a predetermined point value is subtracted from a content item relevance weight value for all users.
In another embodiment, if a content item is selected, a predetermined point value is added to a content item relevance weight value for all users.
In a further embodiment, if a content item is selected on a wireless handset, a predetermined point value is added to a content item relevance weight value associated with the location occupied by the user of the wireless handset.
It will be recognized that the relevance weight value may be adjusted according to a combination of the embodiments described above.
Referring to
Wireless handset 102 periodically receives content items via network 108. The wireless communications include, by way of example and not of limitation, CDMA, WCDMA, GSM or UMTS or any other wireless communication system such as wireless local area network (WLAN), Wi-Fi or WiMAX. Network 108 may be a local area network (“LAN”), wide area network (“WAN”), or any other network to facilitate communication among computers and wireless communication devices.
Typically the content delivered to wireless handset 102 originates from a server such as remote server 106. Content delivery module 110 and relevance weight adjustment module 112 run on a processor, for example, a processor of the remote server. In some embodiments, the content delivery module and relevance weight adjustment module run on separate processors. Content delivery module 110 selects and transmits one or more content items to wireless handset 102. The content items are displayed on a display of the wireless handset. Content deliver module may transmit a content item to the wireless handset at fixed intervals, for example, once per thirty seconds or once per five minutes, e.g., once per minute.
Relevance weight adjustment module 112 adjusts a relevance weight value associated with a content item. Typically, content items and relevance weight values are stored on a database, which may be located on remote server 106.
Referring now to
Illustrative user interface 200 is shown displaying a wireless handset having a touchscreen-type interface; however, it will be appreciated that the user interface may be displayed on any handheld wireless device having a display and a user input means (such as keypad, touchscreen interface, or stylus). Illustrative content items 204-212 are selectable items such as virtual buttons that are activated when the user touches the button on a touchscreen or selects the button with a pointing device.
A feedback input may be displayed proximate to or in conjunction with a content item. The feedback input allows a user to react to the content items displayed. In some embodiments, a positive feedback input, a negative feedback input, or both are displayed. The feedback inputs may be displayed, for example, as “thumbs up” and “thumbs down” symbols displayed on a user-created content item button, as shown at 214 and 216, respectively. The thumbs up and thumbs down input prompts are operable separately from the content item button. When a user selects a feedback input prompt, the wireless handset transmits a feedback message via the network to the remote server 106 indicating the feedback response, e.g., whether the feedback was positive (“thumbs up”) or negative (“thumbs down”). The feedback message may also comprise information about the user, such as a unique user identification (e.g., the User_ID indicated in
A “positive feedback input” may also be referred to as a positive review. A “negative feedback input” as used herein may refer to a negative review.
Typically, the feedback input is used to modify a relevance weight value stored in association with the content item. The feedback input may be used to rank content to be displayed in the user interface. The content items transmitted from the remote server to the wireless handset may be filtered by relevance weight value such that a predetermined number of highest ranked content items are returned or such that only those content items exceeding a predetermined threshold are returned.
Referring now to
Referring to
The Attribute_Group table is stored in a database, such as a relevance engine database. The Attribute_Group table comprises fields Attribute_ID 402 and Attribute_Value 406. The illustrative entry 400 in the Attribute_Group table additionally comprises the field Attribute_Category 404. According to the illustrative entry in the Attribute_Group table, the attribute with the Attribute_ID number 11111111 is an attribute with attribute category “sport” and attribute value “skiing.” If the user indicates skiing as an interest, the attribute ID for skiing may be associated with the user ID in a User_Attribute_Group database table as indicated in
Referring to
Referring to
By way of illustration, user Joe (having user ID 12345678) has indicated an interest in skiing, resulting in the User_Attribute_Group entry shown in
Referring to
In some embodiments, the Location_ID is a unique identification associated with a geofence as described in U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/454,664, entitled “USER INTERFACE FOR GEOFENCE ASSOCIATED CONTENT.” A geofence is a virtual geographic boundary line delineating a geographic area. For example, a database table entry may associate a set of coordinates corresponding to the area bounded by a geofence with a unique Location_ID. The wireless handset 102 is configured to determine whether it is located within a geofence. In some embodiments, the wireless handset may receive content items associated with the geofence in which the wireless handset is located.
In alternative embodiments, Location_ID may be associated with a zip code, city, GPS coordinates, or a distance range surrounding any of the preceding (e.g., a 300 foot radius surrounding a set of GPS coordinates). Location_ID may alternatively indicate a location determined by scanning a code, such as a QR code, with the wireless handset or a location determined by taking a photograph of the environment with the wireless handset.
By way of illustration, content item 00000001 may be an advertisement for a sale on skiing equipment, such as content item 206. In one example, the wireless handset displaying content item 206 is located in a geofence encompassing the ski store to which the advertisement applies. If the user of the handset provides negative feedback, the relevance weight value associated with location (e.g., the ski store geofence) and the content item (e.g. the ski equipment advertisement) is decreased by a predetermined point value. If, for example, an initial relevance weight value of 100 is used for the association between Content_ID 00000001 and Location_ID 22222222, the negative feedback results in a point decrease, for example, a five point decrease, resulting in an adjusted relevance weight value of 95. A method for adjusting Relevance_Weight 706 is described in more detail with reference to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
For example, if user 12345678 (display name “Jim”) provides positive feedback for the content item having content identifier 00000001, all attribute groups associated with user 12345678 are located. Accordingly, the User_Attribute_Group table is queried to return all entries for user 12345678. Since the attribute having attribute identifier 11111111 is associated with user 12345678 in the User_Attribute_Group table, the relevance weight associated with Attribute_ID 11111111 will be modified for the selected content item. In the Group_Content_Rating table, the value of Relevance_Weight is adjusted for the entry having Content_ID 00000001 and Attribute_ID 11111111. Because positive feedback was provided, a point value is added to the current value of Relevance_Weight. For example, when positive feedback is provided, 5 points may be added to the current value of Relevance Weight.
If no entry exists in Group_Content_Rating table having an Attribute_ID matching an attribute of the user providing feedback and a Content_ID of the content item for which feedback was received, a new entry is created in Group_Content Rating when the feedback is received. The new entry has a Content_ID matching the identifier of the content item for which feedback was received and an Attribute_ID matching the identifier of an attribute of the user providing feedback. When a new entry is created, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is a default value. Alternatively, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is the sum of a default value and the point value modification resulting from the user feedback.
If additional attribute entries were located for user 12345678 in the User_Attribute_Group table, the Relevance_Weight value is adjusted for the additional attributes. The process of creating new records (where necessary) and modifying the Relevance_Weight value is continued until the relevance weight has been adjusted for each attribute group associated with the user.
In some embodiments, the method proceeds to optional block 912, at which the adjusted relevance weight value is logged. For example, an entry in a database table such as Content_Rating_Time may be made.
If no positive feedback is received for a content item, the method proceeds to decision diamond 908, at which it is determined whether negative feedback has been received for the content item. If negative feedback has been received, the method proceeds to block 910. At block 910, for each attribute group associated with the user who provided the negative feedback, a point value is subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Attribute_ID value matching the attribute identifier. If no entry in the Group_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above. The method then proceeds to optional step 912 at which the relevance weight value is logged.
Referring now to
The method proceeds to block 1008, at which the relevance weight adjustment module determines whether a content item has been transmitted by content delivery module 110 in excess of N times. N may be a number of times a content item is delivered from remote server 106 to wireless handset 102 or the number of times a content item is delivered to all wireless handsets capable of receiving the content item. For example, N may be 10 serves. If the content item has been transmitted in excess of N times, z points are subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item for all users. Point value z may be any point value, for example, 5 points.
To adjust the Relevance_Weight field for all users, an attribute group having a predetermined Attribute_ID, for example, Attribute_ID 00000000, may be associated with every contact ID. For example, each time a new User_ID is created, User_Attribute_Group may receive an entry associating the new User_ID with Attribute_ID 00000000. The Relevance_Weight value may be adjusted for the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the delivered content item and Attribute_ID 00000000. In this manner, the relevance weight is adjusted for all users when a content item has been transmitted in excess of N times.
In some embodiments, the method then proceeds to optional step 1012 at which the relevance weight value is logged.
Referring now to
At decision diamond 1106, relevance weight adjustment module 112 determines whether positive feedback has been received from the wireless handset. If positive feedback has been received for a content item, the method proceeds to block 1108. At block 1108, a point value x is added to the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Location_ID value matching the location identifier. Point value x may be any point value, for example, 5 points.
If no entry exists in Location_Content_Rating table having an Attribute_ID matching an attribute of the user providing feedback and a Content_ID of the content item for which feedback was received, a new entry is created in Location_Content_Rating when the feedback is received. The new entry has a Content_ID matching the identifier of the content item for which feedback was received and a Location_ID matching the identifier of an attribute of the user providing feedback. When a new entry is created, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is a default value. Alternatively, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is the sum of a default value and the point value modification resulting from the user feedback.
In some embodiments, the method proceeds to optional block 1114, at which the adjusted relevance weight value is logged. For example, an entry in a database table such as Content_Rating_Time may be made.
If no positive feedback is received for a content item, the method proceeds to decision diamond 1110, at which it is determined whether negative feedback has been received for the content item. If negative feedback has been received, the method proceeds to block 1112. At block 1112, for the Location_ID matching the location identifier, a point value is subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and Location_ID value matching the location identifier. If no entry in the Location_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above. The method then proceeds to optional step 1114 at which the relevance weight value is logged.
Referring now to
At decision diamond 1206, relevance weight adjustment module 112 determines whether the content item was selected. A user may select a content item by, for example, clicking a content item button such as content item button 206. If the content item is selected, the method proceeds to block 1208. At block 1208, for the Location_ID of the location reported by the wireless handset, a point value y is added to the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Attribute_ID value matching the attribute identifier. Point value y may be any point value, for example, 2 points. If no entry in the Location_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above
The method proceeds to block 1210, at which the relevance weight adjustment module determines whether a content item has been transmitted by content delivery module 110 in excess of N times. N may be a number of times a content item is delivered from remote server 106 to wireless handset 102 or the number of times a content item is delivered to all wireless handsets capable of receiving the content item. For example, N may be 10 serves during which the content item is delivered. If the content item has been transmitted in excess of N times, z points are subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item for all users. Point value z may be any point value, for example, 5 points.
To adjust the Relevance_Weight field for all users, a location having a predetermined Location_ID, for example, Location_ID 00000000, may be associated with every contact ID. For example, each time a new User_ID is created, User_Attribute_Group may receive an entry associating the new User_ID with Location_ID 00000000. The Relevance_Weight value may be adjusted for the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the delivered content item and Location_ID 00000000. In this manner, the relevance weight is adjusted for all users when a content item has been transmitted in excess of N times.
In some embodiments, the method then proceeds to optional step 1214 at which the relevance weight value is logged.
It is to be understood that the detailed description of illustrative embodiments are provided for illustrative purposes. The scope of the claims is not limited to these specific embodiments or examples. Therefore, various process limitations, elements, details, and uses can differ from those just described, or be expanded on or implemented using technologies not yet commercially viable, and yet still be within the inventive concepts of the present disclosure. The scope of the invention is determined by the following claims and their legal equivalents.
This patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/472,054 entitled CONTENT RELEVANCE WEIGHTING SYSTEM filed on Apr. 5, 2011; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/427,753 entitled INTERACTIVE DISPLAY SYSTEM filed on Dec. 28, 2010; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/427,755 entitled INTERACTIVE DISPLAY SYSTEM filed on Dec. 28, 2010; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/454,664 entitled USER INTERFACE FOR GEOFENCE-ASSOCIATED CONTENT filed on Mar. 21, 2011; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/482,834 entitled CONTENT RELEVANCE WEIGHTING SYSTEM filed on May 5, 2011; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 13/218,256 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,430,492) entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HANDSET POSITIONING WITH DYNAMICALLY UPDATED WI-FI FINGERPRINTING filed on Aug. 25, 2011 that claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/376,936 filed on Aug. 25, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 13/153,214 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,507,494) entitled MERCHANT CONTROLLED PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHOD filed on Jun. 3, 2011 that claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/351,677 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 13/153,238 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,408,032) entitled MERCHANT CONTROL PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH LOCATION-BASED CONTENT DELIVERY filed on Jun. 3, 2011 that claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/351,677 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application of patent application Ser. No. 13/153,248 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,615,347) entitled LOCATION POSITIONING ENGINE SYSTEM AND METHOD filed on Jun. 3, 2011 that claims the benefit of the benefit of provisional patent application 61/351,677 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; the above patent applications hereby incorporated by reference in this patent application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4339798 | Hedges et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4856787 | Itkis | Aug 1989 | A |
5586937 | Menashe | Dec 1996 | A |
5594491 | Hodge et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5630757 | Gagin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643086 | Alcorn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5738583 | Comas et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761416 | Mandal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761647 | Boushy | Jun 1998 | A |
5762552 | Vuong et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768382 | Schneier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779545 | Berg et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800268 | Molnick | Sep 1998 | A |
5851149 | Xidos et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5871398 | Schneier et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5902983 | Crevalt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5947821 | Stone | Sep 1999 | A |
5971849 | Falciglia | Oct 1999 | A |
6001016 | Walker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010404 | Walker et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6106396 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142876 | Cumbers | Nov 2000 | A |
6159095 | Frohm et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178510 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203428 | Giobbi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6259405 | Stewart et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6322446 | Yacenda | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327535 | Evans et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6409602 | Wiltshire et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6500068 | Walker et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6508709 | Karmarkar | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508710 | Paravia et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527638 | Walker et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6554705 | Cumbers | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575834 | Lindo | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6606494 | Arpee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6612928 | Bradford et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628939 | Paulsen | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638170 | Crumby | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640218 | Golding et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6676522 | Rowe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682421 | Rowe et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6702672 | Angell et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709333 | Bradford et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709631 | Mori et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719631 | Tulley et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6749512 | MacGregor et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6782253 | Shteyn et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6834195 | Brandenberg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875110 | Crumby | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6879838 | Rankin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884162 | Raverdy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6942574 | LeMay et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7035651 | Schreiner et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7076243 | Parupudi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7107245 | Kowalick | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7136915 | Rieger, III | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7196662 | Misikangas et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209752 | Myllymaki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213048 | Parupudi et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7218941 | Kubo et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228136 | Myllymaki et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7299059 | Misikangas et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7338372 | Morrow et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7341522 | Yamagishi | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349683 | Misikangas | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7359714 | Parupudi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397424 | Houri | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7450954 | Randall | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7493565 | Parupudi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7529639 | Rasanen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7534169 | Amaitis et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7611407 | Itkis et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7753772 | Walker et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
8002617 | Uskela et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8029349 | Lind | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8172684 | Adiraju et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8403755 | Kerr | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8492995 | Maxik et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8506406 | Kerr | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8506407 | Kerr | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523679 | Kerr | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8738024 | Kerr et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8747229 | Kerr | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8942995 | Kerr | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9043222 | Kerr et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
20010004768 | Hodge et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010005908 | Hodge et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010036224 | Demello et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010039210 | St-Denis | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044337 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002073 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007494 | Hodge | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020056125 | Hodge et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020056143 | Hodge et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069105 | Botelho et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077130 | Owensby | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077167 | Merari | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091568 | Kraft et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103028 | Carter et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111210 | Luciano et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111907 | Ling | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133707 | Newcombe | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142815 | Candelore | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020142844 | Kerr | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020142846 | Paulsen | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144151 | Shell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174436 | Wu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020198775 | Ryan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009385 | Tucciarone et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030030666 | Najmi et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032409 | Hutcheson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030064805 | Wells | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030119578 | Newson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030144017 | Inselberg | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040023721 | Giobbi | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040192438 | Wells et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040224757 | Yamamura et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050046608 | Schantz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048990 | Lauriol | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085257 | Laird et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114212 | Carrez et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136949 | Barnes | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154646 | Chermesino | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159883 | Humphries et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050181804 | Misikangas et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246334 | Tao et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261063 | Boyd et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003830 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004627 | Baluja | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019679 | Rappaport | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058102 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063575 | Gatto et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125693 | Recker | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060181411 | Fast et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189382 | Muir et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194633 | Paulsen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060238382 | Kimchi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060240891 | Klinkhammer et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060287810 | Sadri et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008108 | Schurig et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024580 | Sands et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025265 | Porras et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060306 | Amaitis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061229 | Ramer et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087834 | Moser et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100963 | Ban et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136132 | Weiser et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149215 | Misikangas | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149216 | Misikangas | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070167210 | Kelly et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168127 | Zaruba et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184852 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070218975 | Iddings et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070243925 | LeMay et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244633 | Phillips et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257831 | Mathews et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270212 | Cockerille et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281692 | Bucher et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026844 | Wells | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080032705 | Patel et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039192 | Laut | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080057894 | Aleksic et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076572 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080085692 | Hart et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080096659 | Kreloff et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097858 | Vucina et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102947 | Hays et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108430 | Evans | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113785 | Alderucci et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080153515 | Mock et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162037 | Hasan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166973 | Hart et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167106 | Lutnick et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186234 | Alles et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189360 | Kiley et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207296 | Lutnick et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080227473 | Haney | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080249833 | Ali et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252527 | Garcia | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281668 | Nurminen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090018929 | Weathers | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090150217 | Luff | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090197684 | Arezina et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213771 | Celentano et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214036 | Shen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090298513 | Hampel et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100022308 | Hartmann et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100027521 | Huber et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100039929 | Cho et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100048242 | Rhoads et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063854 | Purvis | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100121567 | Mendelson | May 2010 | A1 |
20100167771 | Raghothaman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179885 | Fiorentino | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100280960 | Ziotopoulos et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287033 | Mathur | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100287052 | Minter | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302056 | Dutton et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100305855 | Dutton et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331016 | Dutton et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110078167 | Sundaresan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110103360 | Ku et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120115512 | Grainger et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120122476 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130003572 | Kim et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009025019 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2008065257 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2008065257 | Jun 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Location aggregation from multiple sources”. Myllymaki . IEEE XPLORE. Jan. 1, 2002. (Year: 2002). |
Wirelss Network. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_network. Nov. 17, 2008. |
“Tracking Cookie.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracking_cookie. May 24, 2009. |
Blom et al. “Transmission Power Measurements for Wireless Sensor Nodes and their Relationship to Battery Level.” Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems. pp. 342-345, Sep. 7, 2005. |
“Wi-Fi Location-Based Services—Design and Deployment Considerations.” 2006 Cisco Systems. Accessed Dec. 2008. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-3418. |
“Location in SIP/IP Core Architecture.” Open Mobile Alliance. Sep. 4, 2008. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.openmobilealliance.org/technical/release_program/locsip_archive.aspx. |
Want et al. “The Active Badge Location System.” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (TOIS) vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 91-102, Jan. 1992. |
Youssef et al. “Location-Clustering Techniques for WLAN Location Determination Systems.” 2006. http://wrc.ejust.edu.eg/papers/ijca.pdf. |
Vegni et al. “Local Positioning Services on IEEE 802.11 Networks.” Radio Engineering, pp. 42-47, vol. 17, No. 2, Jun. 2008. |
Ladd et al. “On the Feasibility of Using Wireless Ethernet for Indoor Localization.” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, pp. 555-559, vol. 20, Issue 3, No. 3, Jun. 2004. |
Kitasuka et al. “Positioning Technique of Wireless LAN Terminal Using RSSI between Terminals”. Jun. 2005. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.techrepublic.com/whitepapers/positioning-technique-of-wireless-lan-terminals-using-rssi-between-terminals/330959. |
Lafargue, Edouard. “Wireless Network Audits using Open Source Tools”. SANS Institute 2003. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/auditing/wireless-network-audits-open-source-tools_1235. |
Heidari, Mohannad. “A Testbed for Real-Time Performance Evaluation of RSS-Based Indoor Geolocation Systems in a Laboratory Environment”. Apr. 21, 2005. Accessed Dec. 2008. https://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-050407-112549/unrestricted/massad.pdf. |
Li et al. “A New Method for Yielding a Database of Location Fingerprints in WLAN” IEE Communications Proceedings, pp. 580-586, vol. 152, Issue 5, Oct. 7, 2005. |
Sakata et al. “An efficient algorithm for Kriging approximation and optimization with large-scale sampling data”. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Volume 193, Issues 3-5, pp. 385-404, Jan. 23, 2004. |
Muthukrishnan, et al. “Sensing motion using spectral and spatial analysis of WLAN RSSI.” Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on Smart sensing and context. 2007. pp. 62-76. |
Capkun et al. “Mobility Helps Peer-to-Peer Security.” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 43-51, Jan. 2006. |
Milojicic et al. “Peer-to-Peer Computing” Jul. 10, 2002. https://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-57R1.pdf. |
“The New Normal of Retailing: The Rise of the Mobile Shopper.” Next Generation Retail Summit. 2010. http://www.ngrsummit.com/media/whitepapers/Microsoft_NGRUS.pdf. |
Lamarca et al. “Place Lab: Positioning Using Radio Beacons in the Wild.” Pervasive 2005, LNCS 3468, pp. 116-133, 2005. |
Borriello et al. “Delivering Real-World Ubiquitous Location Systems.” Communications of the ACM. pp. 36-41, vol. 48, Issue 3, Mar. 2005. |
Schilit et al. “Challenge: Ubiquitous Location-Aware Computing and the “Place Lab” Initiative.” WMASH Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Mobile Applications and Services on WLAN Hotspots. 2003. |
Hightower et al. “Practical Lessons from the Place Lab.” IEEE Pervasive Computing. pp. 32-39, vol. 5, Issue 3, Jul.-Sep. 2006. |
Hile et al. “Indoor Location Estimation with Placelab.” http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/cse590gb/04wi/projects/hile-liu/. Jan. 8, 2004. Accessed on Sep. 25, 2008. |
Kang “Extracting Places from Traces of Locations.” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review. vol. 9, Issue 3, Jul. 2005. |
Lamarca et al. “Self-Mapping in 802.11 Location Systems.” UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3660/2005, 903, DOI: 10.1007/11551201_6. |
Otsason et al. “Accurate GSM Indoor Localization.” Ubiquitous Computing 2005, LNCS 3660, pp. 141-158, 2005. |
Varshavsky et al. “Are GSM Phones the Solution for Localization?” 7th IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2006. pp. 34-42, Aug. 1, 2005. |
Chawathe et al. “A Case Study in Building Layered DHT Applications.” Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications. vol. 35, Issue 4, Oct. 2005. |
Lamarca et al. “Finding Yourself: Experimental location technology relies on Wi-Fi and cellphone signals instead of orbiting satellites.” Dec. 2004. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/networks/finding-yourself. |
Letchner et al. “Large-Scale Localization from Wireless Signal Strength.” In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2005. |
Welbourne et al. “Mobile Context Inference Using Low-Cost Sensors.” Location and Context-Awareness Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3479/2005, pp. 95-127. |
Balakrishnan et al. “Lessons from Developing and Deploying the Cricket Indoor Location System.” Nov. 7, 2003. http://www.sds.lcs.mit.edu/projects/cricket/V1Exp.pdf. |
Cheng et al. “Accuracy Characterization for Metropolitan-scale Wi-Fi Localization.” Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. 2005. |
“Ekahau Positioning Engine 4.2.” 2008. http://www.nowire.se/images/produktblad/ekahau/datasheet_epe_42_en_11022008_Io.pdf. Sep. 29, 2008. |
“Internet Industry Interacting Gambling Code: A Code for Industry Co-Regulation in the Area of Internet Gambling Content Pursuant to the Requirements of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.” Internet Industry Association. Dec. 2001. |
“Internet Industry Interacting Gambling Code: A Code for Industry Co-Regulation in the Area of Internet Gambling Content Pursuant to the Requirements of the Interactive Gaming Act of 2001”. Internet Industry Association. Dec. 2001. |
“Wireless Network.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless.sub.--network. Nov. 17, 2008. cited by applicant. |
Chen et al. “Practical Metropolitan-Scale Positioning for GSM Phone.” UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, vol. 4206/2006, pp. 225-242. |
HTTP Cookie, redirected from tracking cookie as downloaded from wikipedia, 41 pages. |
Interactive Gambling Industry Code, Dec. 2001, 7 pages. |
Ladd et al. “Using Wireless Ethernet for Localization.” IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2002. |
Lafargue, Edouard. “Wireless Network Audits using Open Source Tools”. SANS Institute 2003. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.sans.org/reading.sub.--room/whitepapers/auditing/wireless-netw- ork-audits-open-source-tools.sub.--1235. |
Lamarca et al. “Self-Mapping in 802.11 Location Systems.” UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3660/2005, 903, DOI: 10.1007/11551201.sub.--6. |
Wireless Network as downloaded from wikipedia.com, pages. 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61472054 | Apr 2011 | US | |
61427753 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61427755 | Dec 2010 | US | |
61454664 | Mar 2011 | US | |
61482834 | May 2011 | US | |
61376936 | Aug 2010 | US | |
61351677 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61351770 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61352242 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13218256 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13251735 | US | |
Parent | 13153214 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13218256 | US | |
Parent | 13153238 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13153214 | US | |
Parent | 13153248 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13153238 | US |