Content Relevance Weighting System

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10721705
  • Patent Number
    10,721,705
  • Date Filed
    Monday, October 3, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 21, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item is described. The system comprises a content delivery module configured to deliver a plurality of content items to a device via a network. The content items are displayed on the device. A user provides a feedback input that is a positive review or a negative review for a content item. The feedback input is transmitted to a relevance weight adjustment module that subtracts a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a negative review is received for the content item and adds a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a positive review is received for the content item.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates to a system and method for delivering relevant content to a wireless handset. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item based on user reaction to the content.


BACKGROUND

Services that provide ranked lists of results are well known, for example, in the areas of internet search and advertising. Such services may gauge user response to the provided content to improve the relevance of ranked results provided to the users of the service. Passive user responses, such as selection of content, manipulation of content, or time spent viewing particular content are monitored and the relevance weighting applied to the content is adjusted accordingly. Active user feedback, such as a rating provided by the user for a particular content item, is also used to impact relevance weighting for content.


User profile information such as user interest, user location, etc. has been used in existing content delivery systems to impact the relevance weighting of content. However, existing systems lack means for adjusting relevance weighting of content for a group of users having a shared profile attribute based on both active and passive user responses to received content.


Moreover, there remains a need for a content delivery system that ranks content based on the location of the user accessing the content.


SUMMARY

A system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item is described. The system comprises a plurality of user profiles, each user profile comprising a user identification. The system further comprises a plurality of content items. An initial relevance weight value is associated with each content item. The system further comprises a network. A content delivery module is communicatively coupled to the network. The content delivery module is configured to deliver a plurality of content items to a wireless device via the network. The wireless device is configured to display the content items. A user interface disposed on the wireless device is configured to receive a feedback input associated with at least one content item and transmit the feedback input to the content delivery module. A positive review input disposed on the wireless device corresponds to a positive feedback input. A negative review input disposed on the wireless device corresponds to a negative feedback input. A relevance weight adjustment module operatively coupled to the content delivery module is configured to perform one of a subtraction operation or an addition operation. The subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a negative review is received for the content item. The addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a positive review is received for the content item.


In another embodiment, a system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item comprises a means for displaying content items.


A method for adjusting a relevance value for a content item is also described. The method comprises associating at least one attribute group with a user identification. The method further comprises associating an initial relevance weight value with a content item. A plurality of content items are delivered to a wireless device via a network. The content items are displayed on the wireless device. A user interface disposed on the wireless device receives a feedback input associated with at least one content item. The feedback input is transmitted to the content delivery module. The transmitting comprises transmitting a positive review feedback input when feedback input is received from a positive feedback input disposed on the wireless device. The transmitting further comprises transmitting a negative review feedback input when feedback input is received from a negative feedback input disposed on the wireless device. One of a subtraction operation or an addition operation are performed with a relevance weight adjustment module operatively coupled to the content delivery module. The subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a negative review is received for the content item. The addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with a first set of users when a positive review is received for the content item.





FIGURES

The present invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following drawings which are for illustrative, not limiting, purposes.



FIG. 1 shows a system diagram of an illustrative content item relevance weighting system.



FIG. 2 shows an illustrative user interface for displaying content items on a wireless handset.



FIG. 3 shows an illustrative database table entry for a user profile.



FIG. 4 shows an illustrative database table entry for associating a user identification with an attribute group.



FIG. 5 shows an illustrative database table entry for associating a user identification with an attribute group.



FIG. 6 shows an illustrative database table entry for associating a content item with an attribute group.



FIG. 7 shows an illustrative database table entry for associating a content item with a location identifier.



FIG. 8A shows an illustrative database table entry for associating a content item with a time a relevance weight value.



FIG. 8B shows an illustrative graph showing a change in relevance weight value for a content item over time.



FIG. 9 shows an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a first embodiment.



FIG. 10 shows an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a second embodiment.



FIG. 11 shows an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a third embodiment.



FIG. 12 shows an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a fourth embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Persons of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description is illustrative and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the claimed subject matter will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure.


A relevance weighting system for content is described. Content items are accessible to a plurality of users having user profiles. The content items are delivered via a network to a computing device, such as a wireless handset. The user of the wireless handset may provide feedback for a content item. Based on the feedback received, a relevance weight value associated with the content item is adjusted. One or more passive measures of user response to the content item may also be used to adjust the relevance weight value associated with the content item.


According to one embodiment, when positive feedback is received, for each attribute group associated with the user, a predetermined point value is added to the relevance weight value associated with the content item. An attribute group may be any category to which a user belongs as determined from information provided by or information collected about the user, for example, a location of the user (such as a city or zip code), a user interest, an age of the user or age group to which the user belongs, and so on. Similarly, if negative feedback is received, a predetermined point value is subtracted from the content item relevance weight value for each attribute group associated with the user.


In another embodiment, when positive feedback is received, a predetermined point value is added to a content item relevance weight value for all users. Similarly, if negative feedback is received, a predetermined point value is subtracted from a content item relevance weight value for all users.


In an alternative embodiment, if a content item transmitted to one or more wireless handsets more than a predetermined number of times without being selected, a predetermined point value is subtracted from a content item relevance weight value for all users.


In another embodiment, if a content item is selected, a predetermined point value is added to a content item relevance weight value for all users.


In a further embodiment, if a content item is selected on a wireless handset, a predetermined point value is added to a content item relevance weight value associated with the location occupied by the user of the wireless handset.


It will be recognized that the relevance weight value may be adjusted according to a combination of the embodiments described above.


Referring to FIG. 1, a system diagram of an illustrative content item relevance weighting system is shown. Wireless handset 102 is operated by user 104. The wireless handset may be a mobile handset, mobile phone, wireless phone, portable cell phone, cellular phone, portable phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a tablet, a portable media device, or any type of mobile terminal which is regularly carried by a user and has all the elements necessary for operation in a wireless communication system.


Wireless handset 102 periodically receives content items via network 108. The wireless communications include, by way of example and not of limitation, CDMA, WCDMA, GSM or UMTS or any other wireless communication system such as wireless local area network (WLAN), Wi-Fi or WiMAX. Network 108 may be a local area network (“LAN”), wide area network (“WAN”), or any other network to facilitate communication among computers and wireless communication devices.


Typically the content delivered to wireless handset 102 originates from a server such as remote server 106. Content delivery module 110 and relevance weight adjustment module 112 run on a processor, for example, a processor of the remote server. In some embodiments, the content delivery module and relevance weight adjustment module run on separate processors. Content delivery module 110 selects and transmits one or more content items to wireless handset 102. The content items are displayed on a display of the wireless handset. Content deliver module may transmit a content item to the wireless handset at fixed intervals, for example, once per thirty seconds or once per five minutes, e.g., once per minute.


Relevance weight adjustment module 112 adjusts a relevance weight value associated with a content item. Typically, content items and relevance weight values are stored on a database, which may be located on remote server 106.


Referring now to FIG. 2, an illustrative user interface 200 for displaying content items on wireless handset 102 is shown. The user interface presents a plurality of content items to the user of wireless handset 102. A content item may be any information or product promotion shared with or created by a user. For example, a content item may include text, audio, video, image or a link such as a link to an external website, link to an interactive map or link to one or more content items. In some embodiments, a content item may be an application, such as a purchasing or gaming interface. A content item may be information provided by a facility to a user, such as content items 206, 208 and 212. Alternatively, a content item may be user-created content, such as content item 210. In some embodiments, a content item may activate command function or request function, such as content item 204.


Illustrative user interface 200 is shown displaying a wireless handset having a touchscreen-type interface; however, it will be appreciated that the user interface may be displayed on any handheld wireless device having a display and a user input means (such as keypad, touchscreen interface, or stylus). Illustrative content items 204-212 are selectable items such as virtual buttons that are activated when the user touches the button on a touchscreen or selects the button with a pointing device.


A feedback input may be displayed proximate to or in conjunction with a content item. The feedback input allows a user to react to the content items displayed. In some embodiments, a positive feedback input, a negative feedback input, or both are displayed. The feedback inputs may be displayed, for example, as “thumbs up” and “thumbs down” symbols displayed on a user-created content item button, as shown at 214 and 216, respectively. The thumbs up and thumbs down input prompts are operable separately from the content item button. When a user selects a feedback input prompt, the wireless handset transmits a feedback message via the network to the remote server 106 indicating the feedback response, e.g., whether the feedback was positive (“thumbs up”) or negative (“thumbs down”). The feedback message may also comprise information about the user, such as a unique user identification (e.g., the User_ID indicated in FIG. 3 below). Alternative feedback input means, such as a system that allows a user to rate a content item on a scale, such as a scale of one to ten or a scale of one to five, may be used.


A “positive feedback input” may also be referred to as a positive review. A “negative feedback input” as used herein may refer to a negative review.


Typically, the feedback input is used to modify a relevance weight value stored in association with the content item. The feedback input may be used to rank content to be displayed in the user interface. The content items transmitted from the remote server to the wireless handset may be filtered by relevance weight value such that a predetermined number of highest ranked content items are returned or such that only those content items exceeding a predetermined threshold are returned.


Referring now to FIG. 3, an illustrative database table entry 300 for a user profile is shown. The table may be populated by the user with information provided via a user profile interface on the wireless handset 102. In some embodiments, the user enters user profile information using an interface on a home computer or other device having access to network 108. User profile information is transmitted via network 108 to a database, such as a relevance engine database residing on remote server 106. The user profile information may be stored in the database in a database table, such as a User_Profile database table. The User_Profile table comprises the field user_ID 302. The illustrative entry 300 in the User_Profile table additionally comprises fields Display_Name 304, Gender 306, Zip_Code 308 and Age 310. In some embodiments, the User_Profile table stores additional information such as a user address, user phone number, user name, etc. In some embodiments, a birthday or an age range is stored for the user rather than an age of the user.


Referring to FIG. 4, an illustrative database table entry 400 for an attribute group is shown. The Attribute_Group table stores a unique identifier for each attribute group available to be associated with a user. Attribute groups for a user may include information provided by the user, such as a location of the user, a user interest, an age of the user or an age group to which the user belongs. In some embodiments, the attribute groups include information collected about a user, for example, information from the user's transaction history with a merchant.


The Attribute_Group table is stored in a database, such as a relevance engine database. The Attribute_Group table comprises fields Attribute_ID 402 and Attribute_Value 406. The illustrative entry 400 in the Attribute_Group table additionally comprises the field Attribute_Category 404. According to the illustrative entry in the Attribute_Group table, the attribute with the Attribute_ID number 11111111 is an attribute with attribute category “sport” and attribute value “skiing.” If the user indicates skiing as an interest, the attribute ID for skiing may be associated with the user ID in a User_Attribute_Group database table as indicated in FIG. 5.


Referring to FIG. 5, an illustrative database table entry 500 for associating a user identification with an attribute group is shown. The User_Attribute_Group table comprises fields Attribute_ID 502 and Attribute_ID 504. The illustrative entry in the User_Attribute_Group table associates user ID “12345678” with attribute id “11111111,” indicating that user “Joe” having user ID 12345678 (as indicated in FIG. 2) is associated with the attribute skiing, identified by attribute ID 11111111. The table entry may have been created with Joe indicated an interest in skiing using a user profile interface or other user interface. Alternatively, a merchant or other content administrator may have determined that Joe is interested in skiing based on, for example, Joe's purchases of skiing equipment from the merchant, and created the User_Attribute_Group table entry shown accordingly.


Referring to FIG. 6, an illustrative database table entry 600 for associating a content item with an attribute group and storing a relevance weight value for the association is shown. The Group_Content_Rating table comprises fields Content_ID 602, Attribute_ID 604 and Relevance_Weight 606. Content_ID has value “00000001,” indicating a unique identification for a content item. Illustrative content items are shown in FIG. 2. For example, content item 00000001 may be text advertising a sale on skiis. In the illustrative entry, content 00000001 in association with attribute 11111111 (skiing) has a relevance weight value of 105.


By way of illustration, user Joe (having user ID 12345678) has indicated an interest in skiing, resulting in the User_Attribute_Group entry shown in FIG. 4. Content item 00000001 may be an advertisement for a sale on skiing equipment, such as content item 206 shown in FIG. 2. When Joe provides positive feedback for content item 00000001, all attribute groups associated with Joe and the content item receive an increase to the relevance weight value. If, for example, an initial relevance weight value of 100 is used for the association between Content_ID 00000001 (e.g., the skiing advertisement) and Attribute_ID 11111111 (e.g., skiing), the positive feedback results in a point increase, for example, a five point increase, resulting in an adjusted relevance weight value of 105. Methods for adjusting Relevance_Weight 606 are described in more detail with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10.


Referring to FIG. 7, an illustrative database table entry 700 for associating a content item with a location identifier and storing a relevance weight value for the association is shown. The Location_Content_Rating table comprises fields Content_ID 702, Location_ID 704 and Relevance_Weight 706. Location_ID has value “22222222,” indicating a unique identification for a location.


In some embodiments, the Location_ID is a unique identification associated with a geofence as described in U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/454,664, entitled “USER INTERFACE FOR GEOFENCE ASSOCIATED CONTENT.” A geofence is a virtual geographic boundary line delineating a geographic area. For example, a database table entry may associate a set of coordinates corresponding to the area bounded by a geofence with a unique Location_ID. The wireless handset 102 is configured to determine whether it is located within a geofence. In some embodiments, the wireless handset may receive content items associated with the geofence in which the wireless handset is located.


In alternative embodiments, Location_ID may be associated with a zip code, city, GPS coordinates, or a distance range surrounding any of the preceding (e.g., a 300 foot radius surrounding a set of GPS coordinates). Location_ID may alternatively indicate a location determined by scanning a code, such as a QR code, with the wireless handset or a location determined by taking a photograph of the environment with the wireless handset.


By way of illustration, content item 00000001 may be an advertisement for a sale on skiing equipment, such as content item 206. In one example, the wireless handset displaying content item 206 is located in a geofence encompassing the ski store to which the advertisement applies. If the user of the handset provides negative feedback, the relevance weight value associated with location (e.g., the ski store geofence) and the content item (e.g. the ski equipment advertisement) is decreased by a predetermined point value. If, for example, an initial relevance weight value of 100 is used for the association between Content_ID 00000001 and Location_ID 22222222, the negative feedback results in a point decrease, for example, a five point decrease, resulting in an adjusted relevance weight value of 95. A method for adjusting Relevance_Weight 706 is described in more detail with reference to FIGS. 11-12.


Referring now to FIG. 8A, an illustrative database table entry 800 for associating a content item with a time and a relevance weight value. The Content_Rating_Time table comprises fields Content_ID 802, Time 804 and Relevance_Weight 806. Each time the relevance weight for a content item changes, the relevance weight value and time are logged such that a record of the change in relevance weight for the content item over time as shown in FIG. 8B may be created. The Content_Rating_Time table may further comprise field Attribute_ID or Location_ID to allow the change in relevance weight value over time to be analyzed for a particular attribute group or location.


Referring to FIG. 8B, a graph showing a change in relevance weight value for a content item over time is shown. The graph shown in FIG. 8B may be created from the entries in the Content_Rating_Time table. The change in relevance weight value over time may be useful to content administrators in assessing the success of content items.


Referring now to FIG. 9, an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a first embodiment is shown. The method begins at block 902, at which a content item is received at the wireless handset 102. The content item may be one of a plurality of content items displayed on the handset. At decision diamond 904, relevance weight adjustment module 112 determines whether positive feedback has been received from the wireless handset. If positive feedback has been received for a content item, the method proceeds to block 906. At block 906, for each attribute group associated with the user who provided the positive feedback, a point value x is added to the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Attribute_ID value matching the attribute identifier. Point value x may be any point value, for example, 5 points.


For example, if user 12345678 (display name “Jim”) provides positive feedback for the content item having content identifier 00000001, all attribute groups associated with user 12345678 are located. Accordingly, the User_Attribute_Group table is queried to return all entries for user 12345678. Since the attribute having attribute identifier 11111111 is associated with user 12345678 in the User_Attribute_Group table, the relevance weight associated with Attribute_ID 11111111 will be modified for the selected content item. In the Group_Content_Rating table, the value of Relevance_Weight is adjusted for the entry having Content_ID 00000001 and Attribute_ID 11111111. Because positive feedback was provided, a point value is added to the current value of Relevance_Weight. For example, when positive feedback is provided, 5 points may be added to the current value of Relevance Weight.


If no entry exists in Group_Content_Rating table having an Attribute_ID matching an attribute of the user providing feedback and a Content_ID of the content item for which feedback was received, a new entry is created in Group_Content Rating when the feedback is received. The new entry has a Content_ID matching the identifier of the content item for which feedback was received and an Attribute_ID matching the identifier of an attribute of the user providing feedback. When a new entry is created, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is a default value. Alternatively, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is the sum of a default value and the point value modification resulting from the user feedback.


If additional attribute entries were located for user 12345678 in the User_Attribute_Group table, the Relevance_Weight value is adjusted for the additional attributes. The process of creating new records (where necessary) and modifying the Relevance_Weight value is continued until the relevance weight has been adjusted for each attribute group associated with the user.


In some embodiments, the method proceeds to optional block 912, at which the adjusted relevance weight value is logged. For example, an entry in a database table such as Content_Rating_Time may be made.


If no positive feedback is received for a content item, the method proceeds to decision diamond 908, at which it is determined whether negative feedback has been received for the content item. If negative feedback has been received, the method proceeds to block 910. At block 910, for each attribute group associated with the user who provided the negative feedback, a point value is subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Attribute_ID value matching the attribute identifier. If no entry in the Group_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above. The method then proceeds to optional step 912 at which the relevance weight value is logged.


Referring now to FIG. 10, an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a second embodiment is shown. The method begins at block 1002, at which a content item is transmitted to the wireless handset 102. The content item may be one of a plurality of content items displayed on the handset. At decision diamond 1004, relevance weight adjustment module 112 determines whether the content item was selected. A user may select a content item by, for example, clicking a content item button such as content item button 206. If the content item is selected, the method proceeds to block 1006. At block 1006, for each attribute group associated with the user who provided the positive feedback, a point value y is added to the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Attribute_ID value matching the attribute identifier. Point value y may be any point value, for example, 2 points. If no entry in the Group_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above


The method proceeds to block 1008, at which the relevance weight adjustment module determines whether a content item has been transmitted by content delivery module 110 in excess of N times. N may be a number of times a content item is delivered from remote server 106 to wireless handset 102 or the number of times a content item is delivered to all wireless handsets capable of receiving the content item. For example, N may be 10 serves. If the content item has been transmitted in excess of N times, z points are subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item for all users. Point value z may be any point value, for example, 5 points.


To adjust the Relevance_Weight field for all users, an attribute group having a predetermined Attribute_ID, for example, Attribute_ID 00000000, may be associated with every contact ID. For example, each time a new User_ID is created, User_Attribute_Group may receive an entry associating the new User_ID with Attribute_ID 00000000. The Relevance_Weight value may be adjusted for the Group_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the delivered content item and Attribute_ID 00000000. In this manner, the relevance weight is adjusted for all users when a content item has been transmitted in excess of N times.


In some embodiments, the method then proceeds to optional step 1012 at which the relevance weight value is logged.


Referring now to FIG. 11, an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a third embodiment is shown. The method begins at block 1102, at which a wireless handset transmits a location message to remote server 106. The location message comprises information about the location of the wireless handset. The location is identified by unique identifier Location_ID. At block 1104, a content item is received at the wireless handset 102. In some embodiments, the content item received is related to the location information transmitted in the location message. For example, the content item Content_ID is associated with a Location_ID in an entry in a database table such as the Location_Content_Rating table indicated at FIG. 7. The content item may be one of a plurality of content items displayed on the handset.


At decision diamond 1106, relevance weight adjustment module 112 determines whether positive feedback has been received from the wireless handset. If positive feedback has been received for a content item, the method proceeds to block 1108. At block 1108, a point value x is added to the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Location_ID value matching the location identifier. Point value x may be any point value, for example, 5 points.


If no entry exists in Location_Content_Rating table having an Attribute_ID matching an attribute of the user providing feedback and a Content_ID of the content item for which feedback was received, a new entry is created in Location_Content_Rating when the feedback is received. The new entry has a Content_ID matching the identifier of the content item for which feedback was received and a Location_ID matching the identifier of an attribute of the user providing feedback. When a new entry is created, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is a default value. Alternatively, the new entry may have a Relevance_Weight value that is the sum of a default value and the point value modification resulting from the user feedback.


In some embodiments, the method proceeds to optional block 1114, at which the adjusted relevance weight value is logged. For example, an entry in a database table such as Content_Rating_Time may be made.


If no positive feedback is received for a content item, the method proceeds to decision diamond 1110, at which it is determined whether negative feedback has been received for the content item. If negative feedback has been received, the method proceeds to block 1112. At block 1112, for the Location_ID matching the location identifier, a point value is subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and Location_ID value matching the location identifier. If no entry in the Location_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above. The method then proceeds to optional step 1114 at which the relevance weight value is logged.


Referring now to FIG. 12, an illustrative flow chart indicating a method for adjusting relevance weighting according to a fourth embodiment is shown. The method begins at block 1202, at which a wireless handset transmits a location message to remote server 106. The location message comprises information about the location of the wireless handset. The location is identified by unique identifier Location_ID. At block 1204, a content item is received at the wireless handset 102. In some embodiments, the content item received is related to the location information transmitted in the location message. For example, the content item Content_ID is associated with a Location_ID in an entry in a database table such as the Location_Content_Rating table indicated at FIG. 7. The content item may be one of a plurality of content items displayed on the handset.


At decision diamond 1206, relevance weight adjustment module 112 determines whether the content item was selected. A user may select a content item by, for example, clicking a content item button such as content item button 206. If the content item is selected, the method proceeds to block 1208. At block 1208, for the Location_ID of the location reported by the wireless handset, a point value y is added to the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item identifier and an Attribute_ID value matching the attribute identifier. Point value y may be any point value, for example, 2 points. If no entry in the Location_Content_Rating table exists for the Content_ID and Attribute_ID, a new entry is created as described above


The method proceeds to block 1210, at which the relevance weight adjustment module determines whether a content item has been transmitted by content delivery module 110 in excess of N times. N may be a number of times a content item is delivered from remote server 106 to wireless handset 102 or the number of times a content item is delivered to all wireless handsets capable of receiving the content item. For example, N may be 10 serves during which the content item is delivered. If the content item has been transmitted in excess of N times, z points are subtracted from the value of the Relevance_Weight field of the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the content item for all users. Point value z may be any point value, for example, 5 points.


To adjust the Relevance_Weight field for all users, a location having a predetermined Location_ID, for example, Location_ID 00000000, may be associated with every contact ID. For example, each time a new User_ID is created, User_Attribute_Group may receive an entry associating the new User_ID with Location_ID 00000000. The Relevance_Weight value may be adjusted for the Location_Content_Rating entry having a Content_ID value matching the delivered content item and Location_ID 00000000. In this manner, the relevance weight is adjusted for all users when a content item has been transmitted in excess of N times.


In some embodiments, the method then proceeds to optional step 1214 at which the relevance weight value is logged.


It is to be understood that the detailed description of illustrative embodiments are provided for illustrative purposes. The scope of the claims is not limited to these specific embodiments or examples. Therefore, various process limitations, elements, details, and uses can differ from those just described, or be expanded on or implemented using technologies not yet commercially viable, and yet still be within the inventive concepts of the present disclosure. The scope of the invention is determined by the following claims and their legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item, comprising: a network communicatively coupled to at least one access point;a wireless device corresponding to a first user identification;a remote server including a processor, the processor having at least a relevance engine database stored thereon, the relevance engine database including a plurality of user profiles, each user profile comprising a user identification, wherein the remote server is communicatively coupled to the network;each user identification associated with at least one attribute group, wherein the first user identification and a second user identification are associated with a first attribute group;a plurality of content items;an initial relevance weight value corresponding to an association between the first attribute group and each content item, wherein each content item includes a rank relative to the plurality of content items corresponding to the initial relevance weight value;a plurality of beacons communicatively coupled to the network, wherein each beacon of the plurality of beacons is configured to forward data to at least one beacon of the plurality of beacons, wherein each beacon broadcasts a beacon signal including a radio frequency and a beacon identifier;a beacon signal strength associated with each beacon signal, wherein the beacon signal strength is determined by the wireless device;a positioning module communicatively coupled to the remote server, the positioning module configured to receive a location message from the wireless device through the access point via the network, the location message including at least one beacon identifier and associated beacon signal strength, the positioning module further configured to determine a location of the wireless device, the location associated with the at least one beacon identifier and associated beacon signal strength;a content delivery module communicatively coupled to the remote server, the content delivery module configured to deliver a plurality of content items associated with the location of the wireless device via the network, wherein the plurality of content items are further associated with at least one attribute group associated with the first user identification, and wherein the at least one attribute group includes the first attribute group;the wireless device configured to display at least one of the plurality of content items;a user interface disposed on the wireless device, the user interface configured to: receive a feedback input associated with the at least one content item; andtransmit the feedback input to the content delivery module through the access point via the network;a review input disposed on the wireless device that corresponds to the feedback input; anda relevance weight adjustment module operatively coupled to the content delivery module, the relevance weight adjustment module configured to adjust the initial relevance weight value corresponding to the association between the at least one content item and the first attribute group based on the feedback input, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module further adjusts the rank of the at least one content item relative to the plurality of content items.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the content delivery module is further configured to receive a positive review input from the wireless device that corresponds to a positive feedback input and a negative review input that corresponds to a negative feedback input; and wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is configured to perform one of a subtraction operation and an addition operation.
  • 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received for the at least one content item and the addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a positive review is received for the at least one content item.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to perform: a second subtraction operation comprising subtracting a second point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received for the at least one content item from a second wireless device corresponding to the second user identification; anda second addition operation comprising adding a second point value to the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received for the at least one content item from the second wireless device corresponding to the second user identification.
  • 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to perform a third subtraction operation comprising subtracting a third point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when the at least one content item is delivered in excess of a predetermined number of times.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to log a relevance weight value in association with a time.
  • 7. A system for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item, comprising: a network communicatively coupled to at least one access point;a wireless device corresponding to a first user identification;a remote server including a processor, the processor having at least a relevance engine database stored thereon, the relevance engine database including a plurality of user profiles, each user profile comprising a user identification, wherein the remote server is communicatively coupled to the network;each user identification associated with at least one attribute group, wherein the first user identification and a second user identification are associated with a first attribute group;a plurality of content items, wherein each of the plurality of content items includes an associated location;an initial relevance weight value corresponding to an association between the first attribute group and each content item, wherein each content item includes a rank relative to the plurality of content items corresponding to the initial relevance weight value;a plurality of beacons communicatively coupled to the network, wherein each beacon of the plurality of beacons is configured to forward data to at least one beacon of the plurality of beacons, wherein each beacon broadcasts a beacon signal including a radio frequency and a beacon identifier;a beacon signal strength associated with each beacon signal, wherein the beacon signal strength is determined by the wireless device;a stationary display for displaying at least one of the plurality of content items, the stationary display having a stationary display location, wherein the stationary display is communicatively coupled to the network;a positioning module communicatively coupled to the remote server, the positioning module configured to receive a location message from the wireless device through the access point via the network, the location message including at least one beacon identifier and associated beacon signal strength, the positioning module further configured to determine a location of the wireless device, the location associated with the at least one beacon identifier and associated beacon signal strength;a content delivery module communicatively coupled to the remote server, the content delivery module configured to deliver a plurality of content items associated with the stationary display location via the network when the wireless device is at the stationary display location, wherein the plurality of content items are further associated with at least one attribute group associated with the first user identification, and wherein the at least one attribute group includes the first attribute group;a user interface disposed on the stationary display, the user interface configured to: receive a feedback input associated with at least one content item; andtransmit the feedback input to the content delivery module through the access point via the network;a review input disposed on the stationary display that corresponds to the feedback input; anda relevance weight adjustment modules operatively coupled to the content delivery module, the relevance weight adjustment module configured to adjust the initial relevance weight value corresponding to the association between the at least one content item and the first attribute group based on the feedback input, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module further adjusts the rank of the at least one content item relative to the plurality of content items.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the content delivery module is further configured to receive a positive review input from the wireless device that corresponds to a positive feedback input and a negative review input that corresponds to a negative feedback input; and wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is configured to perform one of a subtraction operation and an addition operation.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received for the at least one content item and the addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a positive review is received for the at least one content item.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to perform: a second subtraction operation comprising subtracting a second point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received for the at least one content item from a second wireless device corresponding to the second user identification; anda second addition operation comprising adding a second point value to the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received for the at least one content item from the second wireless device corresponding to the second user identification.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to perform a third subtraction operation comprising subtracting a third point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when the at least one content item is delivered in excess of a predetermined number of times.
  • 12. The system of claim 7, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to log a relevance weight value in association with a time.
  • 13. A method for adjusting a relevance weight value for a content item, comprising: associating, by a remote server having a processor with at least a relevance engine database stored thereon, at least one attribute group with a first user identification and a second user identification;communicatively coupling the remote server to a network;communicatively coupling at least one access point to the network;associating, by the remote server, an initial relevance weight value with each content item of a plurality of content items, wherein each content item includes a rank relative to the plurality of content items, wherein the initial relevance weight value corresponds to an association between the at least one attribute group and each content item of the plurality of content items, and wherein the rank corresponds to the initial relevance weight value;communicatively coupling each of a plurality of beacons to the network, wherein each beacon of the plurality of beacons is configured to forward data to at least one of the plurality of beacons, and wherein each beacon of the plurality of beacons is associated with a unique beacon identifier;broadcasting, by each of the plurality of beacons, a beacon signal including a radio frequency and a beacon identifier;enabling a wireless device to determine a received beacon signal strength associated with each beacon signal detected by the wireless device, wherein the wireless device corresponds to the first user identification;receiving, by a positioning module configured to determine a location of the wireless device, at least one beacon identifier and associated beacon signal strength from the wireless device;delivering a subset of the plurality of content items to the wireless device through the access point via a network communicatively coupled to the remote server, wherein the subset of content items are each associated with the location of the wireless device, and wherein the subset of content items are further associated with the at least one attribute group associated with the first user identification;displaying at least one of the subset of content items on the wireless device;receiving with a user interface disposed on the wireless device a feedback input associated with at least one content item of the subset of content items; andtransmitting the feedback input to the content delivery module through the access point via the network, wherein the feedback input comprises a review input received from the wireless device; andperforming an adjustment operation with a relevance weight adjustment module operatively coupled to the content delivery module, wherein the adjustment operation comprises adjusting the initial relevance weight value corresponding to the association between the at least one content item and the at least one attribute group based on the feedback input, and adjusting the rank of the at least one content item relative to the plurality of content items.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the adjustment operation further includes one of a subtraction operation and an addition operation, wherein the subtraction operation comprises subtracting a first point value from the relevance weight value associated with each attribute group associated with the user identification when a negative review is received for the at least one content item, and wherein the addition operation comprises adding a first point value to the relevance weight value associated with each attribute group associated with the user identification when a positive review is received for the at least one content item.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to perform: a second subtraction operation comprising subtracting a second point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received; anda second addition operation comprising adding a second point value to the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when a negative review is received.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to perform a third subtraction operation comprising subtracting a third point value from the relevance weight value associated with the at least one content item when the at least one content item is delivered in excess of a predetermined number of times.
  • 17. The method of claim 13, wherein the relevance weight adjustment module is further configured to log a relevance weight value in association with a time.
CROSS-REFERENCE

This patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/472,054 entitled CONTENT RELEVANCE WEIGHTING SYSTEM filed on Apr. 5, 2011; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/427,753 entitled INTERACTIVE DISPLAY SYSTEM filed on Dec. 28, 2010; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/427,755 entitled INTERACTIVE DISPLAY SYSTEM filed on Dec. 28, 2010; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/454,664 entitled USER INTERFACE FOR GEOFENCE-ASSOCIATED CONTENT filed on Mar. 21, 2011; this patent application claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/482,834 entitled CONTENT RELEVANCE WEIGHTING SYSTEM filed on May 5, 2011; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 13/218,256 (now U.S. Pat. No. 10,430,492) entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HANDSET POSITIONING WITH DYNAMICALLY UPDATED WI-FI FINGERPRINTING filed on Aug. 25, 2011 that claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/376,936 filed on Aug. 25, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 13/153,214 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,507,494) entitled MERCHANT CONTROLLED PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHOD filed on Jun. 3, 2011 that claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/351,677 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 13/153,238 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,408,032) entitled MERCHANT CONTROL PLATFORM SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH LOCATION-BASED CONTENT DELIVERY filed on Jun. 3, 2011 that claims the benefit of provisional patent application 61/351,677 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; this patent application is a continuation-in-part of patent application of patent application Ser. No. 13/153,248 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,615,347) entitled LOCATION POSITIONING ENGINE SYSTEM AND METHOD filed on Jun. 3, 2011 that claims the benefit of the benefit of provisional patent application 61/351,677 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, provisional patent application 61/351,770 filed on Jun. 4, 2010, and provisional patent application 61/352,242 filed on Jun. 7, 2010; the above patent applications hereby incorporated by reference in this patent application.

US Referenced Citations (206)
Number Name Date Kind
4339798 Hedges et al. Jul 1982 A
4856787 Itkis Aug 1989 A
5586937 Menashe Dec 1996 A
5594491 Hodge et al. Jan 1997 A
5630757 Gagin et al. May 1997 A
5643086 Alcorn et al. Jul 1997 A
5738583 Comas et al. Apr 1998 A
5761416 Mandal et al. Jun 1998 A
5761647 Boushy Jun 1998 A
5762552 Vuong et al. Jun 1998 A
5768382 Schneier et al. Jun 1998 A
5779545 Berg et al. Jul 1998 A
5800268 Molnick Sep 1998 A
5851149 Xidos et al. Dec 1998 A
5871398 Schneier et al. Feb 1999 A
5902983 Crevalt et al. May 1999 A
5947821 Stone Sep 1999 A
5971849 Falciglia Oct 1999 A
6001016 Walker et al. Dec 1999 A
6010404 Walker et al. Jan 2000 A
6106396 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6142876 Cumbers Nov 2000 A
6159095 Frohm et al. Dec 2000 A
6178510 O'Connor et al. Jan 2001 B1
6203428 Giobbi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6259405 Stewart et al. Jul 2001 B1
6322446 Yacenda Nov 2001 B1
6327535 Evans et al. Dec 2001 B1
6409602 Wiltshire et al. Jun 2002 B1
6500068 Walker et al. Dec 2002 B2
6508709 Karmarkar Jan 2003 B1
6508710 Paravia et al. Jan 2003 B1
6527638 Walker et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554705 Cumbers Apr 2003 B1
6575834 Lindo Jun 2003 B1
6606494 Arpee et al. Aug 2003 B1
6612928 Bradford et al. Sep 2003 B1
6628939 Paulsen Sep 2003 B2
6638170 Crumby Oct 2003 B1
6640218 Golding et al. Oct 2003 B1
6676522 Rowe Jan 2004 B2
6682421 Rowe et al. Jan 2004 B1
6702672 Angell et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709333 Bradford et al. Mar 2004 B1
6709631 Mori et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719631 Tulley et al. Apr 2004 B1
6749512 MacGregor et al. Jun 2004 B2
6782253 Shteyn et al. Aug 2004 B1
6834195 Brandenberg et al. Dec 2004 B2
6875110 Crumby Apr 2005 B1
6879838 Rankin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884162 Raverdy et al. Apr 2005 B2
6942574 LeMay et al. Sep 2005 B1
7035651 Schreiner et al. Apr 2006 B2
7076243 Parupudi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7107245 Kowalick Sep 2006 B1
7136915 Rieger, III Nov 2006 B2
7196662 Misikangas et al. Mar 2007 B2
7209752 Myllymaki et al. Apr 2007 B2
7213048 Parupudi et al. May 2007 B1
7218941 Kubo et al. May 2007 B1
7228136 Myllymaki et al. Jun 2007 B2
7299059 Misikangas et al. Nov 2007 B2
7338372 Morrow et al. Mar 2008 B2
7341522 Yamagishi Mar 2008 B2
7349683 Misikangas Mar 2008 B2
7359714 Parupudi et al. Apr 2008 B2
7397424 Houri Jul 2008 B2
7450954 Randall Nov 2008 B2
7493565 Parupudi et al. Feb 2009 B2
7529639 Rasanen et al. May 2009 B2
7534169 Amaitis et al. May 2009 B2
7611407 Itkis et al. Nov 2009 B1
7753772 Walker et al. Jul 2010 B1
8002617 Uskela et al. Aug 2011 B1
8029349 Lind Oct 2011 B2
8172684 Adiraju et al. May 2012 B2
8403755 Kerr Mar 2013 B2
8492995 Maxik et al. Jul 2013 B2
8506406 Kerr Aug 2013 B2
8506407 Kerr Aug 2013 B2
8523679 Kerr Sep 2013 B2
8738024 Kerr et al. May 2014 B1
8747229 Kerr Jun 2014 B2
8942995 Kerr Jan 2015 B1
9043222 Kerr et al. May 2015 B1
20010004768 Hodge et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010005908 Hodge et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010036224 Demello et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039210 St-Denis Nov 2001 A1
20010044337 Rowe et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020002073 Montgomery et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020007494 Hodge Feb 2002 A1
20020056125 Hodge et al. May 2002 A1
20020056143 Hodge et al. May 2002 A1
20020069105 Botelho et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020077130 Owensby Jun 2002 A1
20020077167 Merari Jun 2002 A1
20020091568 Kraft et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103028 Carter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111210 Luciano et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111907 Ling Aug 2002 A1
20020133707 Newcombe Sep 2002 A1
20020142815 Candelore Oct 2002 A1
20020142844 Kerr Oct 2002 A1
20020142846 Paulsen Oct 2002 A1
20020144151 Shell et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020174436 Wu et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020198775 Ryan Dec 2002 A1
20030009385 Tucciarone et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030030666 Najmi et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030032409 Hutcheson et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030064805 Wells Apr 2003 A1
20030119578 Newson Jun 2003 A1
20030144017 Inselberg Jul 2003 A1
20040023721 Giobbi Feb 2004 A1
20040192438 Wells et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040224757 Yamamura et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050046608 Schantz et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050048990 Lauriol Mar 2005 A1
20050085257 Laird et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050114212 Carrez et al. May 2005 A1
20050136949 Barnes Jun 2005 A1
20050154646 Chermesino Jul 2005 A1
20050159883 Humphries et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050181804 Misikangas et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050246334 Tao et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261063 Boyd et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060003830 Walker et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060004627 Baluja Jan 2006 A1
20060019679 Rappaport Jan 2006 A1
20060058102 Nguyen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063575 Gatto et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060125693 Recker Jun 2006 A1
20060181411 Fast et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189382 Muir et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060194633 Paulsen Aug 2006 A1
20060238382 Kimchi et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240891 Klinkhammer et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060287810 Sadri et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070008108 Schurig et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070024580 Sands et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070025265 Porras et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070060306 Amaitis et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061229 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070087834 Moser et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100963 Ban et al. May 2007 A1
20070136132 Weiser et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149215 Misikangas Jun 2007 A1
20070149216 Misikangas Jun 2007 A1
20070167210 Kelly et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168127 Zaruba et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070184852 Johnson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070218975 Iddings et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070243925 LeMay et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070244633 Phillips et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070257831 Mathews et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070270212 Cockerille et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070281692 Bucher et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080026844 Wells Jan 2008 A1
20080032705 Patel et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039192 Laut Feb 2008 A1
20080057894 Aleksic et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080076572 Nguyen et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080085692 Hart et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080096659 Kreloff et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080097858 Vucina et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080102947 Hays et al. May 2008 A1
20080108430 Evans May 2008 A1
20080113785 Alderucci et al. May 2008 A1
20080153515 Mock et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080162037 Hasan Jul 2008 A1
20080166973 Hart et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167106 Lutnick et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080186234 Alles et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080189360 Kiley et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080207296 Lutnick et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080227473 Haney Sep 2008 A1
20080249833 Ali et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080252527 Garcia Oct 2008 A1
20080281668 Nurminen Nov 2008 A1
20090018929 Weathers Jan 2009 A1
20090150217 Luff Jun 2009 A1
20090197684 Arezina et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090213771 Celentano et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090214036 Shen et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090298513 Hampel et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100022308 Hartmann et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100027521 Huber et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100039929 Cho et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100048242 Rhoads et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100063854 Purvis Mar 2010 A1
20100121567 Mendelson May 2010 A1
20100167771 Raghothaman et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179885 Fiorentino Jul 2010 A1
20100280960 Ziotopoulos et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287033 Mathur Nov 2010 A1
20100287052 Minter Nov 2010 A1
20100302056 Dutton et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100305855 Dutton et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100331016 Dutton et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110078167 Sundaresan et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110103360 Ku et al. May 2011 A1
20120115512 Grainger et al. May 2012 A1
20120122476 Lee et al. May 2012 A1
20130003572 Kim et al. Jan 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2009025019 Feb 2009 JP
2008065257 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008065257 Jun 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (45)
Entry
“Location aggregation from multiple sources”. Myllymaki . IEEE XPLORE. Jan. 1, 2002. (Year: 2002).
Wirelss Network. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_network. Nov. 17, 2008.
“Tracking Cookie.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracking_cookie. May 24, 2009.
Blom et al. “Transmission Power Measurements for Wireless Sensor Nodes and their Relationship to Battery Level.” Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems. pp. 342-345, Sep. 7, 2005.
“Wi-Fi Location-Based Services—Design and Deployment Considerations.” 2006 Cisco Systems. Accessed Dec. 2008. https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-3418.
“Location in SIP/IP Core Architecture.” Open Mobile Alliance. Sep. 4, 2008. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.openmobilealliance.org/technical/release_program/locsip_archive.aspx.
Want et al. “The Active Badge Location System.” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems (TOIS) vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 91-102, Jan. 1992.
Youssef et al. “Location-Clustering Techniques for WLAN Location Determination Systems.” 2006. http://wrc.ejust.edu.eg/papers/ijca.pdf.
Vegni et al. “Local Positioning Services on IEEE 802.11 Networks.” Radio Engineering, pp. 42-47, vol. 17, No. 2, Jun. 2008.
Ladd et al. “On the Feasibility of Using Wireless Ethernet for Indoor Localization.” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, pp. 555-559, vol. 20, Issue 3, No. 3, Jun. 2004.
Kitasuka et al. “Positioning Technique of Wireless LAN Terminal Using RSSI between Terminals”. Jun. 2005. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.techrepublic.com/whitepapers/positioning-technique-of-wireless-lan-terminals-using-rssi-between-terminals/330959.
Lafargue, Edouard. “Wireless Network Audits using Open Source Tools”. SANS Institute 2003. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/auditing/wireless-network-audits-open-source-tools_1235.
Heidari, Mohannad. “A Testbed for Real-Time Performance Evaluation of RSS-Based Indoor Geolocation Systems in a Laboratory Environment”. Apr. 21, 2005. Accessed Dec. 2008. https://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-050407-112549/unrestricted/massad.pdf.
Li et al. “A New Method for Yielding a Database of Location Fingerprints in WLAN” IEE Communications Proceedings, pp. 580-586, vol. 152, Issue 5, Oct. 7, 2005.
Sakata et al. “An efficient algorithm for Kriging approximation and optimization with large-scale sampling data”. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. Volume 193, Issues 3-5, pp. 385-404, Jan. 23, 2004.
Muthukrishnan, et al. “Sensing motion using spectral and spatial analysis of WLAN RSSI.” Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on Smart sensing and context. 2007. pp. 62-76.
Capkun et al. “Mobility Helps Peer-to-Peer Security.” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 43-51, Jan. 2006.
Milojicic et al. “Peer-to-Peer Computing” Jul. 10, 2002. https://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-57R1.pdf.
“The New Normal of Retailing: The Rise of the Mobile Shopper.” Next Generation Retail Summit. 2010. http://www.ngrsummit.com/media/whitepapers/Microsoft_NGRUS.pdf.
Lamarca et al. “Place Lab: Positioning Using Radio Beacons in the Wild.” Pervasive 2005, LNCS 3468, pp. 116-133, 2005.
Borriello et al. “Delivering Real-World Ubiquitous Location Systems.” Communications of the ACM. pp. 36-41, vol. 48, Issue 3, Mar. 2005.
Schilit et al. “Challenge: Ubiquitous Location-Aware Computing and the “Place Lab” Initiative.” WMASH Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Mobile Applications and Services on WLAN Hotspots. 2003.
Hightower et al. “Practical Lessons from the Place Lab.” IEEE Pervasive Computing. pp. 32-39, vol. 5, Issue 3, Jul.-Sep. 2006.
Hile et al. “Indoor Location Estimation with Placelab.” http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/cse590gb/04wi/projects/hile-liu/. Jan. 8, 2004. Accessed on Sep. 25, 2008.
Kang “Extracting Places from Traces of Locations.” ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review. vol. 9, Issue 3, Jul. 2005.
Lamarca et al. “Self-Mapping in 802.11 Location Systems.” UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3660/2005, 903, DOI: 10.1007/11551201_6.
Otsason et al. “Accurate GSM Indoor Localization.” Ubiquitous Computing 2005, LNCS 3660, pp. 141-158, 2005.
Varshavsky et al. “Are GSM Phones the Solution for Localization?” 7th IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2006. pp. 34-42, Aug. 1, 2005.
Chawathe et al. “A Case Study in Building Layered DHT Applications.” Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications. vol. 35, Issue 4, Oct. 2005.
Lamarca et al. “Finding Yourself: Experimental location technology relies on Wi-Fi and cellphone signals instead of orbiting satellites.” Dec. 2004. http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/networks/finding-yourself.
Letchner et al. “Large-Scale Localization from Wireless Signal Strength.” In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2005.
Welbourne et al. “Mobile Context Inference Using Low-Cost Sensors.” Location and Context-Awareness Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3479/2005, pp. 95-127.
Balakrishnan et al. “Lessons from Developing and Deploying the Cricket Indoor Location System.” Nov. 7, 2003. http://www.sds.lcs.mit.edu/projects/cricket/V1Exp.pdf.
Cheng et al. “Accuracy Characterization for Metropolitan-scale Wi-Fi Localization.” Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services. 2005.
“Ekahau Positioning Engine 4.2.” 2008. http://www.nowire.se/images/produktblad/ekahau/datasheet_epe_42_en_11022008_Io.pdf. Sep. 29, 2008.
“Internet Industry Interacting Gambling Code: A Code for Industry Co-Regulation in the Area of Internet Gambling Content Pursuant to the Requirements of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.” Internet Industry Association. Dec. 2001.
“Internet Industry Interacting Gambling Code: A Code for Industry Co-Regulation in the Area of Internet Gambling Content Pursuant to the Requirements of the Interactive Gaming Act of 2001”. Internet Industry Association. Dec. 2001.
“Wireless Network.” Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless.sub.--network. Nov. 17, 2008. cited by applicant.
Chen et al. “Practical Metropolitan-Scale Positioning for GSM Phone.” UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, vol. 4206/2006, pp. 225-242.
HTTP Cookie, redirected from tracking cookie as downloaded from wikipedia, 41 pages.
Interactive Gambling Industry Code, Dec. 2001, 7 pages.
Ladd et al. “Using Wireless Ethernet for Localization.” IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2002.
Lafargue, Edouard. “Wireless Network Audits using Open Source Tools”. SANS Institute 2003. Accessed Dec. 2008. http://www.sans.org/reading.sub.--room/whitepapers/auditing/wireless-netw- ork-audits-open-source-tools.sub.--1235.
Lamarca et al. “Self-Mapping in 802.11 Location Systems.” UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous Computing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3660/2005, 903, DOI: 10.1007/11551201.sub.--6.
Wireless Network as downloaded from wikipedia.com, pages. 5 pages.
Provisional Applications (9)
Number Date Country
61472054 Apr 2011 US
61427753 Dec 2010 US
61427755 Dec 2010 US
61454664 Mar 2011 US
61482834 May 2011 US
61376936 Aug 2010 US
61351677 Jun 2010 US
61351770 Jun 2010 US
61352242 Jun 2010 US
Continuation in Parts (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 13218256 Aug 2011 US
Child 13251735 US
Parent 13153214 Jun 2011 US
Child 13218256 US
Parent 13153238 Jun 2011 US
Child 13153214 US
Parent 13153248 Jun 2011 US
Child 13153238 US