Control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9126650
  • Patent Number
    9,126,650
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 21, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 8, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars is described, comprising a support body fixable to the handlebars of the bicycle and a brake lever pivoted to the support body, a resisting arm of which integrally moves with an end of a brake cable, the support body having a grippable distal-upper projection, the brake lever having a first actuation area in a first riding condition gripping the support body, and a second actuation area in a second riding condition gripping the projection.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars, typical of racing bicycles.


BACKGROUND

Typical control devices feature a support body fixable to the handlebars of the bicycle and a brake lever pivotally attached thereto. The brake lever comprises a resisting arm to which an end of a brake cable is attached, typically an inextensible sheathed cable (Bowden cable). When the brake lever is actuated by bringing its power arm towards the handlebars, the resisting arm of the brake lever moves away from the handlebars, and the resulting tension on the brake cable actuates the brake, thus clamping its jaws around the rim of the wheel. In some of these control devices, so-called integrated devices, there are also one or more levers and/or one or more buttons to actuate a derailleur of the bicycle gearshift.


In one riding condition, the cyclist grips the handlebars. Such a riding position is the most favorable for braking, both because the actual power arm is at its maximum, and because the cyclist acts upon the lever with the fingers other than the thumb, and in particular with the forefinger and the middle finger, starting from a condition in which the hand is substantially open.


In another riding condition, the cyclist grips the support body itself, resting the palm of the hand on its top surface. The actuation of the brake lever is still efficient, because the power arm is still sufficiently long, and the cyclist starts from a condition in which the hand is only partially closed.


From this riding condition, in order to avoid the cyclist's hand sliding forwards away from the support body losing its grip, control devices are known wherein the support body is provided with a small projection in a distal-upper position. However these projections are not grippable. Also known are control devices wherein the support body includes a horn-shaped projection, arched inwards, which are intended to support a display device, and are therefore not grippable.


Control devices are known wherein the projection of the support bodies is extended in order to facilitate gripping in yet another riding condition. Some of these devices feature a grippable horn-shaped projection, arched inwards. However, in order to actuate the brake lever from the riding condition in which the cyclist grips the projection by resting the palm of the hand on its proximal surface and closing the fingers around the projection itself, the cyclist must however actually release his/her grip, opening the fingers and sliding the palm on the top surface of the support body. In short, braking is only possible if the cyclist positions himself/herself in the above described riding condition in which the cyclist grips the support body.


Therefore, there remains a need for a control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars that is particularly versatile and safe with regard to the riding and braking conditions.


SUMMARY

The invention relates to a control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars. The control device comprises a support body having a grippable distal upper projection, and fixable to the handlebars of the bicycle, and a brake lever pivotally mounted to the support body, a resisting arm of which, integrally moves with an end of a brake cable. The brake lever has a first actuation area in a first riding condition gripping the support body, and a second actuation area in a second riding condition gripping the projection. A third actuation area may also be incorporated into the brake lever for use in a third riding condition.


The invention also relates to a brake lever for a bicycle with curved handlebars. The brake lever features a pivot pin, a resisting arm with which an end of a brake cable integrally moves, and a power arm. The power arm comprises an upper portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side, an intermediate portion having a convexity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side. The brake lever has a first actuation area comprising the intermediate portion and the bottom portion, and a second actuation area comprising the upper portion and the intermediate portion.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further characteristics and advantages of the invention shall become clearer from the description of a preferred embodiment thereof, made with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a control device according to the invention;



FIG. 2 shows the control device of FIG. 1 in a view from the inner side;



FIG. 3 shows the control device of FIG. 1 in a view from the distal side;



FIG. 4 shows the control device of FIG. 1 in a top view;



FIG. 5 shows the control device of FIG. 1 in a gripping and braking condition;



FIG. 6 shows the control device of FIG. 1 in another gripping and braking condition; and



FIG. 7 shows the control device of FIG. 1 in still another gripping and braking condition.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Introduction to the Embodiments

In the present introduction and description, and in the attached claims, all spatial references such as vertical, horizontal, distal, proximal, top, bottom, inner and outer are made with reference to the condition of the support body fixed to the handlebars; in particular, by proximal, facing towards the handlebars is meant, while by distal, facing away from the handlebars is meant, by inner, facing towards the center of the handlebars is meant, while by outer, facing away from the center of the handlebars is meant.


The support body is more specifically fixable projecting distally from the curved ends of the handlebars, so that the brake lever hangs substantially vertically therefrom, in front of the curved ends of the handlebars.


The invention relates to a control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars. The control device comprises a support body having a grippable distal-upper projection fixable to the handlebars of the bicycle, and a brake lever pivoted to the support body, a resisting arm of which integrally moves with an end of a brake cable. The brake lever comprises a first actuation area in a first riding condition gripping the support body, and a second actuation area in a second riding condition gripping the projection. In an alternate embodiment, a third actuation area may also be incorporated into the brake lever for use in a third riding condition.


The projection preferably projects further inwards with respect to the inner side of the support body, forming a recess intended to receive the cyclist's thumb in said second riding condition. Through such a recess, a small rotation of the wrist is caused, and consequently the fingers other than the thumb, or at least the middle finger, ring finger and little finger close, in a lowered position, below the projection itself. Preferably, the projection projects inwards with respect to the inner side of the support body by a distance at its upper end comprised between 2 and 12 mm, more preferably between 4 and 8 mm, and even more preferably of 6.5 mm.


In a preferred embodiment, the projection is convex in a distal-outer part thereof. Such a convexity preferably has a radius of curvature comprised between 30 and 45 mm, more preferably between 33 and 38 mm, even more preferably of 35 mm.


It is also preferred that the projection is convex in an upper-outer part thereof. The convexity is preferred to have a radius of curvature comprised between 10 and 30 mm, more preferably between 13 and 20 mm, even more preferably of 15 mm.


Preferably, the projection has a distal surface extending above the brake lever. Such a distal surface advantageously provides a rest for the cyclist's forefinger, to improve the grip in the second riding condition, possibly also during braking. Preferably, said distal surface extends for a height comprised between 5 and 30 mm, more preferably between 10 and 20 mm, and even more preferably of 14 mm.


A pivot pin of the brake lever is below and a first distance from the upper surface of the support body comprised between 0 and 15 mm, more preferably between 3 and 10 mm, even more preferably of 6 mm. Because this distance is particularly short, it is possible to make a brake lever that works in mechanically advantageous conditions from all riding conditions.


Preferably, the ratio between the distance of the point of application of the middle finger within the first actuation area from the top surface of the support body and said first distance is greater than 3.3, more preferably it is greater than 7 and even more preferably it is 10.


Preferably, the ratio between the distance of the point of application of the middle finger within the second actuation area from the upper surface of the support body and said first distance is greater than 1, more preferably it is greater than 3, and even more preferably it is 5.


Preferably, the distance between a pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is comprised between 20 and 30 mm, more preferably between 23 and 27 mm, even more preferably it is 24.6 mm.


Preferably, the ratio between the distance of the point of application of the middle finger within said first actuation area from a pivot pin of the brake lever and the distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is comprised between 1.5 and 3.3, more preferably between 2 and 2.5, and even more preferably it is 2.26.


Moreover, the ratio between the distance of the point of application of the middle finger within said second actuation area from a pivot pin of the brake lever and the distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is preferably comprised between 0.6 and 1.9, more preferably between 0.8 and 1.4, and even more preferably it is 1.13.


It is envisioned that the first actuation area and the second actuation area overlap for at least 30%, more preferably for at least 50%.


The brake lever, at the first actuation area, has an upper portion having a convexity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side. As a result, the middle finger rests in an area with an inclination of the brake lever from distal-upper to proximal-bottom, which is particularly advantageous for the application of force that must be exerted on the brake lever in the first riding condition.


Preferably, the portion with convexity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever has a radius of curvature comprised between 47 and 60 mm, preferably between 50 and 56 mm, even more preferably of 53 mm, and the portion with concavity facing towards the distal side has a radius of curvature comprised between 50 and 62 mm, more preferably between 53 and 59 mm, even more preferably of 56 mm.


At the second actuation area, the brake lever preferably has an upper portion having a convexity facing towards the distal side, an intermediate portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having a convexity facing towards the distal side. As a result, the middle finger rests in an area with an inclination of the brake lever from proximal-upper to distal-bottom, which is particularly advantageous for the pushing action that has to be exerted onto the brake lever in the second riding condition.


Preferably, the top portion has a radius of curvature comprised between 45 and 55 mm, preferably between 48 and 52 mm, even more preferably of 50 mm, the intermediate portion has a radius of curvature comprised between 30 and 38 mm, more preferably between 32 and 36 mm, even more preferably of 34 mm, and the bottom portion has a radius of curvature comprised between 47 and 60 mm, more preferably between 50 and 56 mm, even more preferably of 53 mm.


In another preferred embodiment, the brake lever further has a third actuation area in a third riding condition gripping the handlebars. The third actuation area preferably has a concavity facing towards the distal side, which is particularly advantageous in applying the force that has to be exerted onto the brake lever. Preferably, the portion with concavity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever has a radius of curvature comprised between 50 and 62 mm, more preferably between 53 and 59 mm, even more preferably of 56 mm.


Typically, the end of the brake cable is made to integrally move with the brake lever through insertion of a head thereof in an idle pin fixed to the brake lever.


Preferably the brake lever has one or more weight reduction holes.


In a second aspect thereof, the invention concerns a brake lever for a bicycle with curved handlebars, having a pivot pin, a resisting arm with which an end of a brake cable integrally moves, and a power arm. The power arm has an upper portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side, an intermediate portion having a convexity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side. The brake lever has a first actuation area comprising said intermediate portion and said bottom portion, and a second actuation area comprising said upper portion and said intermediate portion.


In another preferred embodiment, the brake lever also has a third actuation area comprising said bottom portion.


In the preferred arrangement, the upper portion has a length comprised between 18 and 22 mm, more preferably of 20 mm. The intermediate portion has a length comprised between 38 and 46 mm, more preferably of 42 mm. And the bottom portion has a length comprised between 52 and 64 mm, more preferably of 58 mm.


The resisting arm of the brake lever has an upper portion having a concavity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having the convexity facing towards the distal side. It is preferred that the upper portion of the resisting arm has a length comprised between 30 and 40 mm, more preferably of 35 mm.


In any of the above described embodiments, it is preferred that that the brake lever has one or more weight reduction holes.


Preferred values of the radii of curvature of the brake lever and other advantageous characteristics thereof are indicated above with reference to the control device of the invention.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIGS. 1-4 illustrate a control device 1 for a bicycle with curved handlebars M according to the invention. The control device 1 is a left control device, having a brake lever 2 typically intended to control the front brake. The control device 1 is more specifically an integrated control device, further comprising a lever 3 and a button lever 4 typically used for controlling the front derailleur of the bicycle. A right control device, typically intended to control the rear brake and possibly the rear derailleur of the bicycle, mirrors the illustrated control device 1, and therefore it is not shown and described herein.


The control device 1 comprises a support body 5 fixable to the handlebars M, through suitable means such as a clamp 22, at the curved left end of the handlebars M, so as to distally project from the handlebars M.


The brake lever 2 is pivoted about a pivot pin 6 extending substantially horizontally in a distal position of the support body 5.


The brake lever 2, above the pivot pin 6, has a resisting arm 7. An end of the brake cable F is attached close to an end of the resisting arm 7 and moves integrally therewith. More specifically, a head T at the end of the brake cable F is inserted into a transversal hole of an idle pin 8, in a per se well known way.


The idle pin 8 is at a distance L1 (FIG. 2) from the pivot pin 6 of the brake lever 2, this distance L1 representing the actual resisting arm of the brake lever 2.


Below the pivot pin 6, the brake lever 2 has an actuation arm 9 hanging from the support body 5 substantially vertically, in front of the curved end of the handlebars M.


The brake lever 2 further has a per se known stop device 10, which allows the brake lever 2 to move between a rest position and a release position. From the rest position the actuation arm 9 moves towards the handlebars M, and therefore the resisting arm 7 moves away from the handlebars M, causing the actuation of the brake through the traction of the brake cable F through the idle pin 8, integrally moving with the brake lever 2. In the release position, the actuation arm 9 is moved further away from the handlebars M, and therefore the resisting arm 7 is brought closer to the handlebars with respect to the rest position, to allow the brake cable F to be detensioned and therefore allow the jaws of the brake to be widened and promote the disassembly operations of the wheel.


The support body 5 has a distal-upper projection 11. The projection 11 projects for a height H1 (FIG. 2) from a substantially flat upper surface 12 of the support body 5.


As can be seen in FIG. 3, the projection 11 projects inwardly with respect to an inner side 13 of the support body up to a distance S at its upper end 14, forming a recess 15 of the control device 1. In its distal-outer part, the projection 11 is convex with radius of curvature R5.


The projection 11 has a width W1 at the base corresponding to the width of the support body 5, and a width W2 at its upper end 14 slightly smaller than the width W1 at the base. As shown in FIG. 3, widths W1 and W2 are measured in a direction extending from an inner side of the projection 11, proximal to the inner side 13 of the support body 5, to an outer surface of the projection 11.


The projection 11 has a length P1 (FIG. 4) at the base, and a length P2 at its upper end 14 much smaller than the length P1 at the base. As shown in FIG. 2, lengths P1 and P2 are measured in a direction extending from a proximal surface 17 to a distal surface 16 of the projection 11. In its outer upper part, the projection 11 is convex with radius of curvature R6. The projection 11 therefore has an overall rounded horn shape.


Referring generally to FIG. 2, the pivot pin 6 of the brake lever 2 is below and at a distance D1 from the upper surface 12 of the support body 5.


The resisting arm 7 of the brake lever 2 extends substantially for its entire length in a distal cavity (not shown) of the projection 11, but not for the entire height H1 of the projection 11. In other words, the projection 11 has a distal surface 16 extending for a height H2 above the brake lever 2. The projection 11 also has a proximal surface 17 smoothly fitted to the upper surface 12 of the support body 5.


The support body 5 has a length P3 at its upper surface 12, a height that slightly decreases from a height H3 at the proximal side to a height H4 at the beginning of the projection 11 and, as stated above, a width W1 (FIG. 3).


The brake lever 2, in particular its distal surface, has a curvilinear progression. Substantially the entire length of its resisting arm 7 has a convexity towards the distal side, with radius of curvature R1 for a portion of length L5. At the pivot pin 6, the brake lever has a concavity towards the distal side, with curvature R2 for a portion of length L6. The portion of the actuation arm 9 adjacent to the pivot pin 6 has a convexity towards the distal side, with radius of curvature R3 for a portion of length L7. The remaining portion of the actuation arm 9, or free end, has a concavity towards the distal side, with radius of curvature R4 for a portion of length L8. The various curvatures are smoothly fitted at inflection points.


The brake lever 2 further has one or more weight reduction holes 21.


The brake lever 2 of the control device 1 is actuatable from three distinct riding conditions of the cyclist.


In one riding condition, shown in FIG. 5, the cyclist grips the curved end of the handlebars M, on which the palm rests. The thumb can be closed around the handlebars M. The four fingers other than the thumb can also be closed around the handlebars M during riding. In order to be ready to brake, the cyclist opens one or more of the four fingers other than the thumb and places them around the brake lever 2 in an actuation area 18 comprising the portion of concavity of radius of curvature R4 and length L8. More specifically, the concavity towards the distal side of the brake lever 2 is particularly advantageous for applying the force that has to be exerted on the brake lever 2 by the cyclist in such a riding condition.


The actual power arm relative to this riding condition, meant as the distance between the pivot pin 6 and the central point of application of force through the middle finger, is indicated with L2. It should be noted that the actual position of the fingers and in particular of the middle finger, can vary between cyclists, and therefore the actual power arm L2 can slightly vary according to the size of the cyclist's hand. The distance between the point of application of force and the upper surface 12 of the support body 5 is indicated with D2.


Such a riding position is the most favorable for braking, both because the actual power arm L2 is at its maximum, and because the cyclist acts upon the lever 2 starting from a condition in which the hand is substantially open.


In another riding condition, shown in FIG. 6, the cyclist grips the support body 5, resting the palm of his/her hand on its upper surface 12 and the thumb on the inner side 13 of the support body 5. The projection 11 advantageously performs the function of preventing slipping of the cyclist's hand in the distal direction away from the support body 5.


The four fingers other than the thumb, or at least the little finger and/or the ring finger, can be closed around the support body 5 during riding. In order to be ready for braking, the cyclist places one or more of the four fingers other than the thumb, typically the forefinger and the middle finger, around the brake lever in an actuation area 19 comprising part of the portion of convexity of radius of curvature R3 and length L7, and part of the portion of concavity of radius of curvature R4 and length L8. More specifically, the middle finger rests in the bottom area of the portion of convexity of radius of curvature R3 or in the upper area of the portion of concavity of radius of curvature R4, and therefore in an area with an inclination of the brake lever 2 from distal-upper to proximal-bottom. This inclination is particularly advantageous for applying the force that has to be exerted on the brake lever 2 by the cyclist in this riding condition.


The actual power arm relative to this riding position, again meant as the distance between the pivot pin 6 and the central point of application of force through the middle finger, is indicated with L3. As noted above, the actual position of the fingers and in particular of the middle finger, and therefore the actual power arm L3 can slightly vary according to the size of the cyclist's hand. The distance between this point of application of force and the upper surface 12 of the support body 5 is indicated with D3.


The actuation of the brake lever 2 from this riding condition in which the cyclist grips the support body 5 is in general still easy, since the actual power arm L3 remains sufficient and the cyclist starts from a condition in which the hand is only partially closed.


In yet another riding condition, shown in FIG. 7, the cyclist grips the projection 11, resting the palm of the hand on its proximal surface 17 and the thumb in the recess 15 of the control device 1. Due also to the inclination of the projection 11 and to the recess 15, a small rotation of the wrist is caused and the fingers other than the thumb consequently close around the brake lever 2, with the fingers, except for the forefinger, substantially all below the pivot pin 6.


The convexities of the projection 11 make it easier for it to be gripped and for the brake lever 2 to be reached with the hand fingers in this riding condition. Specifically, the four fingers other than the thumb are closed around the brake lever 2 in an actuation area 20 comprising part of the portion of convexity of radius of curvature R1, the portion of concavity of radius of curvature R2, and part of the portion of convexity of radius of curvature R3. More specifically, the middle finger rests in a bottom area of the portion of concavity R2 or in an upper area of the portion of convexity R3 of the brake lever 2, and therefore in an area with an inclination of the brake lever 2 from proximal-upper to distal-bottom. This inclination is particularly advantageous for the pushing action that has to be exerted on the brake lever 2 by the cyclist in this riding condition.


In order to improve the grip, the cyclist's forefinger can also be closed around the distal surface 16 of the projection 11, both during normal riding and also during braking.


The actual power arm relative to this riding position, again meant as the distance between the pivot pin 6 and the central point of application of force through the middle finger, is indicated with L4. Also in this case, the actual position of the fingers and in particular of the middle finger, and therefore the actual power arm L4 can slightly vary according to the size of the cyclist's hand. The distance between such a point of application of force and the upper surface 12 of the support body 5 is indicated with D4.


The actuation of the brake lever 2 from this riding condition in which the cyclist grips the projection 11 is in general still easy, because the actual power arm L4 is still sufficient and the cyclist starts from a condition in which the hand is only partially closed.


This riding condition, in which the cyclist grips the projection 11, is the most critical since the actual power arm L4 is relatively short and the cyclist starts from a condition in which the hand is practically closed. However, since as stated above the middle finger, the ring finger and the little finger rest on the actuation area 20 below the pivot pin 6, braking is possible and easy, in part as a result of the described curvature of the brake lever 2.


It should be noted that the actuation area 19 and the actuation area 20 overlap in part, preferably for at least 30%, more preferably for at least 50%.


Acceptable ranges, preferred ranges and preferred values of various sizes and size ratios of the control device 1 are indicated in TABLE 1.















TABLE 1








Acceptable

Preferred
Preferred




range

range
value
























D1
0-15
mm
3-10
mm
6
mm



D2
84-94
mm
80-90
mm
84
mm



D3
50-70
mm
55-65
mm
60
mm



D4
20-40
mm
25-35
mm
30
mm












D3/D1
>3.3
>7
10



D4/D1
>1  
>3
 5















H1
30-55
mm
35-48
mm
42
mm



H2
5-30
mm
10-20
mm
14
mm



H3
47-62
mm
50-58
mm
54
mm



H4
35-50
mm
40-45
mm
42
mm



L1
20-30
mm
23-27
mm
24.6
mm



L2
68-88
mm
73-83
mm
78
mm



L3
46-66
mm
50-60
mm
55.6
mm



L4
18-38
mm
23-33
mm
27.8
mm



L5
30-40
mm


35
mm



L6
18-22
mm


20
mm



L7
38-46
mm


42
mm



L8
52-64
mm


58
mm



P1
35-65
mm
40-55
mm
45
mm



P2
6-26
mm
10-20
mm
16
mm



P3
58-78
mm
63-73
mm
67.5
mm



R1
45-55
mm
48-52
mm
50
mm



R2
30-38
mm
32-36
mm
34
mm



R3
47-60
mm
50-56
mm
53
mm



R4
50-62
mm
53-59
mm
56
mm



R5
30-45
mm
33-38
mm
35
mm



R6
10-30
mm
13-20
mm
15
mm



S
2-12
mm
4-8
mm
6.5
mm



W1
20-40
mm
25-35
mm
30
mm



W2
6-26
mm
10-20
mm
16
mm










It should be noted that the distance D1 of the pivot pin 6 of the brake lever 2 from the upper surface 12 of the support body 5 is substantially less than typical values of controls of the prior art, which are around 24 to 36 mm.


The ratio between the distance D3 of the point of application of force in the riding condition of FIG. 6 and the upper surface 12 of the support body 5 with respect to such a distance D1 is consequently substantially greater than the typical values of controls of the prior art, which are around 2.5.


It should also be noted that, in the case of the preferred values indicated above, the lever ratio, meant as the ratio between the actual power arm L2, L3, L4 respectively for the three riding conditions, and the actual resisting arm L1 is 3.17, 2.26, 1.13 respectively for the three riding conditions. Therefore, in all three riding conditions there is a mechanical advantage.


To control the derailleur, the lever 3 and the button lever 4 could be replaced by a single lever with double direction of actuation, by a pair of levers, by a pair of button levers, or also one or both could be replaced, in the case of control of an electrical/electronic gearshift, by a control button for a switch, with one or more levers being possibly provided to actuate the button.


The control device 1 could also not be of the integrated type, with the lever 3 and the button lever 4 being omitted.


Vice-versa, the control device could comprise further elements, such as one or more buttons, with possible associated levers, to control an electronic device such as a cycle computer.

Claims
  • 1. A control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars, comprising a support body fixable to the handlebars of the bicycle, and a brake lever pivoted to the support body, a resisting arm of which, in use, integrally moves with an end of a brake cable, the support body having a grippable distal-upper projection, the brake lever having a first actuation area and a second actuation area, wherein the first actuation area is associated with a first condition of use where the support body is gripped, and the second actuation area is associated with a second condition of use where the projection is gripped,wherein a pivot pin of the brake lever is below and at a first distance from an upper surface of the support body between 0 and 15 mm,a distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is between 20 and 30 mm, andthe brake lever has a curvilinear progression that extends an entire length of the lever, wherein from an end attached to the support body to a free end of the brake lever, the curvilinear progression consists of: a first convexity towards a distal side having a first radius of curvature for a first distance, a first concavity towards the distal side having a second radius of curvature for a second distance, a second convexity towards the distal side having a third radius of curvature for a third distance, and a second concavity towards the distal side having a fourth radius of curvature for a fourth distance.
  • 2. A control device according to claim 1, wherein the distal-upper projection extends from a flattened portion of the upper surface of the support body for a height between 30 mm and 55 mm to define the distal-upper projection's upper end, the distal-upper projection comprises a base, and the upper end and the base extend in a respective distal or proximal direction, wherein the upper end extends for a length between about 6 mm and about 26 mm in a direction extending from a proximal surface to a distal surface of the upper projection and the base extends for a length between about 35 mm and 65 mm.
  • 3. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the first radius of curvature is between about 45 mm and 55 mm.
  • 4. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the first distance of the first convexity is between about 30 mm and 40 mm.
  • 5. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the second radius of curvature is between about 30 mm and about 38 mm.
  • 6. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the second distance of the first concavity is between about 18 mm and 22 mm.
  • 7. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the third radius of curvature is between about 47 mm and about 60 mm.
  • 8. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the third distance of the second convexity is between about 38 mm and 46 mm.
  • 9. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the fourth radius of curvature is between about 50 mm and 62 mm.
  • 10. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the fourth distance of the second concavity is between about 52 mm and 64 mm.
  • 11. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the brake lever, at the first actuation area associated with the first condition of use where the support body is gripped, has an upper portion having said second convexity facing towards a distal side of the brake lever, and a bottom portion having said second concavity facing towards the distal side.
  • 12. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the brake lever, at the second actuation area associated with the second condition of use, has an upper portion having said first convexity facing towards a distal side of the brake lever, an intermediate portion having said first concavity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having said second convexity facing towards the distal side.
  • 13. The control device according to claim 1, wherein the brake lever further has a third actuation area that is associated with a third condition of use where the handlebars are gripped.
  • 14. The control device according to claim 13, wherein the brake lever, at the third actuation area, has said second concavity facing towards the distal side.
  • 15. A control device according to claim 1, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of force within said first actuation area as measured from the upper surface of the support body and said first distance is greater than 3.3.
  • 16. A control device according to claim 1, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of force within said second actuation area as measured from the upper surface of the support body and said first distance is greater than 1.
  • 17. A control device according to claim 1, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of a force within said first actuation area as measured from the pivot pin of the brake lever and the distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is between 1.5 and 3.3.
  • 18. A control device according to claim 1, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of a force within said second actuation area as measured from the pivot pin of the brake lever and the distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is between 0.6 and 1.9.
  • 19. A control device according to claim 1, wherein the end of the brake cable is made to integrally move with the brake lever through insertion of a head thereof in an idle pin fixed to the brake lever.
  • 20. A control device according to claim 1, wherein the brake lever has one or more weight reduction holes.
  • 21. A control device according to claim 1, wherein the brake lever at the first actuation area, has an upper portion having said second convexity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever, and a bottom portion having said second concavity facing towards the distal side.
  • 22. A control device according to claim 1, wherein the brake lever, at the second actuation area, has an upper portion having said first convexity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever, an intermediate portion having said first concavity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having said second convexity facing towards the distal side.
  • 23. A control device for a bicycle with curved handlebars, the control device comprising: a support body that has a grippable distal-upper projection, is adapted for mounting on a bicycle handlebar, and has a brake lever that is pivotally mounted to the support body by a pivot pin and receives a brake cable end,the brake lever has a first actuation area associated with when the support body is gripped in a first condition of use and has a second actuation area associated with when the distal-upper projection is gripped in a second condition of use,wherein the pivot pin of the brake lever is located at a first distance from an upper surface of the support body that is between 0 and 15 mm,the pivot pin of the brake lever and the brake cable end are spaced at a distance between 20 and 30 mm, andthe brake lever has a curvilinear progression that extends an entire length of the lever, wherein from an end attached to the support body to a free end of the brake lever, the curvilinear progression consists of: a first convexity towards a distal side having a first radius of curvature for a first distance, a first concavity towards the distal side having a second radius of curvature for a second distance, a second convexity towards the distal side having a third radius of curvature for a third distance, and a second concavity towards the distal side having a fourth radius of curvature for a fourth distance.
  • 24. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the projection further projects inwards with respect to an inner side of the support body, forming a recess intended to receive the rider's thumb in said second riding condition.
  • 25. A control device according to claim 24, wherein the projection projects inwards with respect to the inner side of the support body by a distance at an upper end between 2 and 12 mm.
  • 26. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the projection is convex in a distal-outer part thereof.
  • 27. A control device according to claim 26, wherein said convexity has a radius of curvature between 30 and 45 mm.
  • 28. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the projection is convex in an upper-outer part thereof.
  • 29. A control device according to claim 28, wherein said convexity has a radius of curvature between 10 and 30 mm.
  • 30. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the projection has a distal surface extending above the brake lever.
  • 31. A control device according to claim 30, wherein said distal surface extends for a height between 5 and 30 mm above the brake lever.
  • 32. A control device according to claim 23, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of force within said first actuation area as measured from the upper surface of the support body and said first distance is greater than 3.3.
  • 33. A control device according to claim 23, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of force within said second actuation area as measured from the upper surface of the support body and said first distance is greater than 1.
  • 34. A control device according to claim 23, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of a force within said first actuation area as measured from the pivot pin of the brake lever and the distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is between 1.5 and 3.3.
  • 35. A control device according to claim 23, wherein a ratio between a distance associated with a point of application of a force within said first actuation area as measured from the pivot pin of the brake lever and the distance between the pivot pin of the brake lever and a point of integral movement of the brake cable and the brake lever is between 0.6 and 1.9.
  • 36. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the brake lever, at the first actuation area, has an upper portion having said second convexity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever, and a bottom portion having said second concavity facing towards the distal side.
  • 37. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the brake lever, at the second actuation area, has an upper portion having said first convexity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever, an intermediate portion having said first concavity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having said second convexity facing towards the distal side.
  • 38. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the brake lever further has a third actuation area that is associated with a third condition of use where the handlebars are gripped.
  • 39. A control device according to claim 38, wherein the brake lever, at the third actuation area, has said second concavity facing towards the distal side.
  • 40. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the end of the brake cable is made to integrally move with the brake lever through insertion of a head thereof in an idle pin fixed to the brake lever.
  • 41. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the brake lever has one or more weight reduction holes.
  • 42. The control device of claim 23, wherein the brake lever at the second actuation area has an upper portion having the first convexity facing towards the distal side of the brake lever, an intermediate portion having the first concavity facing towards the distal side, and a bottom portion having the second convexity facing towards the distal side, the brake lever further has a third actuation area that is associated with a third condition of use where the handlebars are gripped and the third actuation area has the second concavity facing towards the distal side, wherein the first concavity of the intermediate portion of the second actuation area has a radius of curvature that is approximately 60% of a radius of curvature of the second concavity of the third actuation area.
  • 43. The control device of claim 23, wherein the first radius of curvature is between about 45 mm and 55 mm.
  • 44. The control device of claim 23, wherein the first distance of the first convexity is between about 30 mm and 40 mm.
  • 45. The control device of claim 23, wherein the second radius of curvature is between about 30 mm and about 38 mm.
  • 46. The control device of claim 23, wherein the second distance of the first concavity is between about 18 mm and 22 mm.
  • 47. The control device of claim 23, wherein the third radius of curvature is between about 47 mm and about 60 mm.
  • 48. The control device of claim 23, wherein the third distance of the second convexity is between about 38 mm and 46 mm.
  • 49. The control device of claim 23, wherein the fourth radius of curvature is between about 50 mm and 62 mm.
  • 50. The control device of claim 23, wherein the fourth distance of the second concavity is between about 52 mm and 64 mm.
  • 51. A control device according to claim 23, wherein the first actuation area and the second actuation area overlap for at least 30% of their respective lengths.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
M107A2230 Nov 2007 IT national
US Referenced Citations (98)
Number Name Date Kind
1706542 Pugh et al. Mar 1929 A
2384728 Crumble Sep 1945 A
2586604 Bennett Feb 1952 A
2770980 Millward Nov 1956 A
2854857 Gleasman et al. Oct 1958 A
3279779 Thomas et al. Oct 1966 A
3760648 Hoffman Sep 1973 A
3776061 Yoshigai Dec 1973 A
3915029 Shimada Oct 1975 A
3972247 Armstrong Aug 1976 A
4002350 Timbs Jan 1977 A
4075871 Burke Feb 1978 A
4100820 Evett Jul 1978 A
4319673 Kojima Mar 1982 A
4454784 Shimano Jun 1984 A
4459871 Shimano Jul 1984 A
4605240 Ciem et al. Aug 1986 A
4740001 Torleumke Apr 1988 A
D298309 Coue Nov 1988 S
4840082 Terashima et al. Jun 1989 A
4885951 Desenclos et al. Dec 1989 A
4930368 Nagano Jun 1990 A
4945785 Romano Aug 1990 A
4966046 Tagawa Oct 1990 A
5012692 Nagano May 1991 A
5020387 Nagano Jun 1991 A
5050444 Nishimura Sep 1991 A
5094120 Tagawa Mar 1992 A
RE34007 Desenclos et al. Jul 1992 E
5159851 Rahmes Nov 1992 A
5186071 Iwasaki Feb 1993 A
5203213 Nagano Apr 1993 A
5213005 Nagano May 1993 A
5222412 Nagano Jun 1993 A
5241878 Nagano Sep 1993 A
5257683 Romano Nov 1993 A
5279179 Yoshigai Jan 1994 A
5287765 Scura Feb 1994 A
5303608 Iwasaki Apr 1994 A
5400675 Nagano Mar 1995 A
5479776 Romano Jan 1996 A
5480356 Campagnolo Jan 1996 A
5515743 Lumpkin May 1996 A
5528954 Yoshigai Jun 1996 A
5601001 Kawakami et al. Feb 1997 A
5676020 Jordan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676021 Campagnolo Oct 1997 A
5676022 Ose Oct 1997 A
5755139 Kojima May 1998 A
5787757 Ozaki Aug 1998 A
5791195 Campagnolo Aug 1998 A
5806372 Campagnolo Sep 1998 A
5832782 Kawakami Nov 1998 A
5896779 Biersteker et al. Apr 1999 A
5900705 Kimura May 1999 A
5921140 Lemmens et al. Jul 1999 A
5970816 Savard Oct 1999 A
6073730 Abe Jun 2000 A
6095010 Arbeiter Aug 2000 A
6098488 Vos Aug 2000 A
6370981 Watarai Apr 2002 B2
6457377 Hsu Oct 2002 B1
6502477 Assel Jan 2003 B1
6553861 Ose Apr 2003 B2
6564670 Feng et al. May 2003 B2
6564671 Ose May 2003 B2
6647823 Tsumiyama et al. Nov 2003 B2
6792826 Dal Pra′ Sep 2004 B2
7100471 Irie et al. Sep 2006 B2
20020078789 Chen Jun 2002 A1
20020104401 Dal Pra′ Aug 2002 A1
20020124679 Dal Pra′ Sep 2002 A1
20020139637 Tsumiyama et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030094064 Dal Pra′ May 2003 A1
20030167871 Irie et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177855 Tsumiyama et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040144193 Sato et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040237697 Kawakami Dec 2004 A1
20040237698 Hilsky et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050241428 Tsai Nov 2005 A1
20060070480 Fujii Apr 2006 A1
20060207375 Jordan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060272443 Tsumiyama Dec 2006 A1
20070034037 Dal Pra′ et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070068332 Fujii et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070137388 Dal Pra′ Jun 2007 A1
20070137391 Fujii Jun 2007 A1
20070178715 Fujii Aug 2007 A1
20070186715 Dal Pra′ Aug 2007 A1
20070193386 Fujii Aug 2007 A1
20070204716 Dal Pra′ Sep 2007 A1
20080098848 Dal Pra′ et al. May 2008 A1
20080196537 Dal Pra′ Aug 2008 A1
20080210041 Dal Pra′ et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080210042 Dal Pra′ Sep 2008 A1
20090025504 Dal Pra′ et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090031846 Dal Pra′ et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090133526 Dal Pra′ et al. May 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (87)
Number Date Country
248133 Apr 1947 CH
1144761 Mar 1997 CN
2436412 Jun 2001 CN
1443679 Sep 2003 CN
1550405 Dec 2004 CN
3136922 Mar 1983 DE
3706545 Sep 1988 DE
19607640 Jan 1997 DE
202006006796 Aug 2006 DE
0371254 Jun 1990 EP
0478901 Apr 1992 EP
0504118 Sep 1992 EP
0504118 Sep 1992 EP
0361335 Feb 1994 EP
0601211 Jun 1994 EP
0601221 Jun 1994 EP
0635422 Jan 1995 EP
0504118 Apr 1995 EP
0714826 Jun 1996 EP
0744334 Nov 1996 EP
0790175 Aug 1997 EP
1123861 Aug 2001 EP
1134158 Sep 2001 EP
1245483 Oct 2002 EP
0785128 Nov 2002 EP
1264765 Dec 2002 EP
1342655 Sep 2003 EP
1440878 Jul 2004 EP
1449756 Aug 2004 EP
1473220 Nov 2004 EP
1481883 Dec 2004 EP
1502847 Feb 2005 EP
1535829 Jun 2005 EP
1564131 Aug 2005 EP
1642823 Apr 2006 EP
1642823 Apr 2006 EP
1698550 Sep 2006 EP
1698551 Sep 2006 EP
1705110 Sep 2006 EP
1739001 Jan 2007 EP
1816066 Aug 2007 EP
1826111 Aug 2007 EP
960276 Apr 1950 FR
2777528 Oct 1999 FR
2777528 Oct 1999 FR
9805066 Oct 1999 FR
2861686 Feb 2006 FR
615173 Jan 1949 GB
2012893 Aug 1979 GB
58003987 Jun 1956 JP
51060342 May 1976 JP
17893 Jan 1982 JP
17894 Jan 1982 JP
58030884 Feb 1983 JP
224879 Dec 1983 JP
59094989 UA Jun 1984 JP
60107475 Jun 1985 JP
639516 Mar 1988 JP
157092 Oct 1989 JP
2088384 Mar 1990 JP
03292280 Dec 1991 JP
04331689 Nov 1992 JP
05097088 Apr 1993 JP
05082786 Nov 1993 JP
05286476 Nov 1993 JP
06016170 Jan 1994 JP
07033063 Feb 1995 JP
07251784 Oct 1995 JP
08328679 Dec 1996 JP
10147263 Jun 1998 JP
2006103674 Apr 2006 JP
2007223594 Sep 2007 JP
61241287 Oct 2007 JP
136125 Jun 1990 TW
510875 Nov 2002 TW
519089 Jan 2003 TW
570013 Jan 2004 TW
1223636 Nov 2004 TW
200505732 Feb 2005 TW
M290134 May 2006 TW
200709988 Mar 2007 TW
I279353 Apr 2007 TW
200738512 Oct 2007 TW
I289127 Nov 2007 TW
9218374 Oct 1992 WO
03093094 Nov 2003 WO
2005044656 May 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Chinese Office Action, Appl. No. CN 200610090826.7, dated Apr. 3, 2009.
Chinese Office Action, Appl. No. CN 200710005823.3, dated Sep. 25, 2009.
Chinese Office Action, Appl. No. CN 200810082341.2, dated Nov. 30, 2010.
European Search Report, Appl. No. EP 05425458.6, dated Nov. 16, 2005.
European Search Report, Appl. No. EP 05017003.4, dated Dec. 20, 2005.
European Search Report, Appl. No. 06003694.4, dated Jul. 31, 2006.
European Search Report, Appl. No. RS 144832, dated Apr. 16, 2007
European Search Report, Appl. No. RS 115409, dated Jul. 18, 2007.
European Search Report, Appl. No. RS 115410, dated Jul. 31, 2007.
European Search Report, Appl. No. RS115682, dated Oct. 30, 2007.
European Search Report, Appl. No. 08003760.9, dated Jun. 27, 2008.
European Search Report, Appl. No. EP 08003755.9, dated Jun. 27, 2008.
European Search Report, Appl. No. EP 08022485.0, dated Jul. 2, 2009.
European Search Report, Appl. No. 08005438.0, dated Nov. 5, 2010.
Japanese Office Action, Appl. No. JP 2002-332045, dated Dec. 16, 2008.
Japanese Office Action, Appl. No. JP 2008-550914, dated May 24, 2011.
English Translation of Japanese Office Action, Appl. No. 2006-176333, dated Aug. 23, 2011.
Taiwan Search Report, Appl. No. 096101651, dated Oct. 5, 2011.
Taiwan Office Action and Search Report, Appl. No. 095121477, dated Nov. 25, 2011.
European Search Report, Appln. No. EP 08005438.0-2425/2062809, dated Nov. 5, 2010.
Japanese Office Action for Application No. 2008-297977 dated Nov. 27, 2012 (with English translation).
English translation of Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report issued May 28, 2013 in correspondingTaiwanese Patent Application No. 097145163.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090133526 A1 May 2009 US