The present invention relates to a control device comprising: a reference frame; a stick; a pivot mounting the stick to the reference frame, the pivot defining a pivot axis; and an actuator for rotating the stick about the pivot axis.
A first known control device of this kind is described in US 2006/0254377. The stick is driven about two perpendicular pivot axes (A, B) by respective rotary actuators. A balance weight is provided on the A-axis in order to provide vertical mass balance about the B-axis. In other words, the balance weight ensures that there is no net induced moment about the B-axis when the device is subjected to a vertical acceleration perpendicular to the A and B axes.
A first problem with this arrangement is that the balance weight adds to the total weight of the device. A second problem is that the balance weight adds to the total volume of the device. A third problem is that the device is not horizontally mass balanced. Therefore, if the device is subjected to a horizontal acceleration, then there will be a net induced moment about the A or B axis. This mass imbalance must be compensated by one or both of the actuators, which adds complexity to the system.
A second known control device of this kind is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,580. This device is also not horizontally mass balanced.
In a first aspect, a control device comprises: a reference frame; a stick; a pivot mounting the stick to the reference frame and defining a pivot axis; and an actuator for rotating the stick about the pivot axis, wherein the centres of mass of the actuator and the stick are offset from the pivot axis such that if the control device is subjected to an acceleration orthogonal to the pivot axis, then the mass of the actuator and the mass of the stick generate moments about the pivot axis which act in opposite directions.
By offsetting the centres of mass of the actuator and the stick from the pivot axis, the mass of the stick can be at least partially balanced by the mass of the actuator without requiring an additional balance weight.
Typically a line passing through the pivot axis and the centre of mass of the stick also passes through the actuator. Preferably this line passes substantially through the centre of mass of the actuator. This enables the device to be mass balanced with respect to both vertical and horizontal acceleration of the device (in the case where the pivot axis is horizontal). In the more general case, if the line passes substantially through the centre of mass of the actuator, then the device is mass balanced with respect to two axes which are perpendicular to the pivot axis. However the centre of mass of the actuator may be slightly offset from this line and still provide an element of mass balance.
The actuator may be a linear actuator (such as a hydraulic piston or linear electric actuator) but more preferably the actuator is a rotary actuator having a stator coupled to the slick and a rotor coupled to the reference frame by a drive link and configured to rotate relative to the stator about a drive axis which is not co-linear with the pivot axis.
In a further aspect, a control device comprises: a reference frame; a stick; a pivot mounting the stick to the reference frame and defining a pivot axis; and a rotary actuator having a stator coupled to the stick and a rotor coupled to the reference frame by a drive link and configured to rotate relative to the stator about a drive axis which is not co-linear with the pivot axis.
In contrast with the devices described in US 2006/0254377 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,708,580 the drive axis of the rotary actuator is not co-linear with the pivot axis, enabling a more mass balanced arrangement. Also, a rotary actuator is typically more compact and lighter than a linear actuator, and is also typically easier to backdrive.
Preferably the drive link is pivotally coupled to the rotor by a first drive pivot and to the reference frame by a second drive pivot.
In certain examples the drive axis is not parallel with the pivot axis. For instance it may lie at a perpendicular or acute angle with the pivot axis. In other embodiments of the invention the drive axis is substantially parallel with the pivot axis.
Preferably the device is substantially mass balanced about the pivot axis.
Examples will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The control device shown in
A stick is attached to a pivot block 11. The stick comprises a shaft 3 and a handle 4. A pivot shaft 7 extends from opposite sides of the pivot block 11, and is journalled in the pair of pivot supports 6b so that the stick is free to rotate about the pivot axis X defined by the pivot shaft 7.
A rotary actuator has an output shaft 2 which is fixed to the pivot block 11 and extends from an opposite side of the pivot axis X. The actuator has a casing 1 coupled to the mounting plate 6a by a drive link 5. The drive link 5 is pivotally coupled to the casing 1 by a first drive pivot and to the mounting plate 6a by a second drive pivot.
In the arrangement of
A torque sensor 20 is provided to sense the torque applied to the output shaft 2. The torque sensor may be implemented for example by a set of strain gauges or piezo-electric elements. The torque sensor measures the force applied to the stick by a pilot.
When operating in an active mode, the actuator applies a force to the stick, for instance to provide force feedback to the pilot. When in passive mode the actuator has no power applied to it and the pilot is able to move the stick by driving the actuator backwards without a significant resistance. Alternatively a device to disconnect the actuator drive may be fitted to decouple the actuator.
Instead of employing a torque sensor 20 for measuring the torque applied to the output shaft 2 of the actuator, a force sensor 21 may be fixed to the drive link 5. In both cases the force/torque sensor will sense the moment about the pivot axis X.
By positioning the torque/force sensors to directly sense the output of the actuator, the sensors are insensitive to g induced moments and therefore the active control of the stick is also unaffected by g loads.
The centres of mass of the actuator and the stick are offset on opposite sides of the pivot axis X. As a result the device is vertically mass balanced about the pivot axis X—the vertical direction being perpendicular to the pivot axis X and to the axis Y labelled shown in
Therefore if the stick is subjected to a vertical acceleration of ng then the moment about the pivot axis X in the vertical direction is given by:
M=−l1m1ng+l2m2ng equation (1)
where:
Also, a line (labelled A in
The casing 1 of the actuator is fixed to the pivot block 11 by an arm 12, and the output shaft 2 is coupled to the mounting plate 6a by the drive link 5, and a crank shaft 13 extending at right angles to the drive axis. The drive link 5 is pivotally coupled to the crank shaft 13 by a first drive pivot and to the mounting plate 6a by a second drive pivot.
In the arrangement of
In common with the device of
The mounting plate 6a is fixed to a casing 8 of a second (Y-axis) actuator. Instead of being fixed to the mounting plate 6a, the pivot supports 6b are fixed to a mounting bracket 9, which is fixed in turn to an output shaft 10 of the Y-axis actuator. Thus in the two-axis device the pivot supports 6b and mounting bracket 9 provide a first (X-axis) reference frame and the mounting plate 6a provides a second (Y-axis) reference frame. The drive link 5 is pivotally coupled to the casing 1 by a first drive pivot and to the mounting bracket 9 by a second drive pivot.
In contrast to the arrangement of
The two-axis devices shown in
The two-axis devices of
The devices shown in the figures may be used on a vehicle such as a helicopter. For instance the one-axis devices shown in
Although the above has been described above with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that various changes or modifications may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0714916.4 | Jul 2007 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2475484 | De Nise | Jul 1949 | A |
2678179 | Feeney et al. | May 1954 | A |
2955784 | Vogel et al. | Oct 1960 | A |
3795150 | Eckhardt | Mar 1974 | A |
4069720 | Thor | Jan 1978 | A |
4071209 | Hart | Jan 1978 | A |
4150803 | Fernandez | Apr 1979 | A |
4383455 | Tuda et al. | May 1983 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4531080 | Nordstrom et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4982918 | Kaye | Jan 1991 | A |
5107080 | Rosen | Apr 1992 | A |
5265486 | Hartman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5456428 | Hegg | Oct 1995 | A |
5473235 | Lance et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5721566 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5816105 | Adelstein | Oct 1998 | A |
5898599 | Massie et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900710 | Gautier et al. | May 1999 | A |
6644600 | Olson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6708580 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
8066567 | Waggoner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8087619 | Hanlon et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20030030621 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060254377 | Henle | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080079381 | Hanlon et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090229396 | Taylor et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 085 518 | Aug 1983 | EP |
08 57783 | Mar 1996 | JP |
WO 8809290 | Dec 1988 | WO |
WO 0154587 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for Application No. PCT/GB2008/002582, mailed Feb. 26, 2009. |
International Search Report received in International (PCT) Application No. PCT/GB2008/002582, mailed Feb. 26, 2009. |
R.L. Hermans, “Design of an Actuated Side Stick Controller for the Simona Research Simulator”, Sep. 1999, Technical University Delft, pp. 1-154. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090031840 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |