Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a method for controlling rail vehicles, a corresponding apparatus and a suitably equipped rail vehicle.
For a single-track line section between two stations with alternating traversal directions, it is known that the problem of train protection has to be solved using complex interlocking and signaling technology together with a train control system comprising a train stop function.
The disadvantage of this is that train protection is implemented centrally for the single-track line section, which increases the complexity.
The object of the invention is to avoid this disadvantage and present an alternative decentralized, less complex solution which also ensures train protection having the reliability required for rail services.
This object is achieved according to the features of the independent claims. Preferred embodiments are set forth particularly in the dependent claims.
To achieve the object, a method for controlling rail vehicles is proposed in which
Thus, particularly for a single-track line section between two stations with alternating traversal directions, the problem of train protection is solved by means of the exclusive right of way (implemented e.g. using a token). This advantageously involves minimal use of decentralized lineside equipment.
The exclusive right of way can also be advantageously used for controlling the rail vehicle (e.g. initiating or carrying out a braking operation).
A development is that the line section is a single-track line section, e.g. between two stations.
Another development is that the exclusive right of way is passed to the second storage device by the rail vehicle shortly before, shortly after or as it leaves the line section.
Another development is in particular that the storage devices are disposed in the area of the ends of the single-track line section.
A further development is that the first storage device and the second storage device have an RFID tag, wherein the exclusive right of way corresponds to at least one predefined value or signal of the RFID tag.
The RFID tag can therefore be read by the rail vehicle as it enters the line section and marked as invalid by means of a control signal. Alternatively, an invalid value can also be written to the RFID tag by the rail vehicle, wherein basically any value is possible which indicates that no exclusive right of way can be provided by the storage device.
It should be noted here that any type of communication is possible between the rail vehicle and the storage devices, e.g. wireless transmission, near field communication, communication via a (power) line, etc. The storage device can be of active or passive design. The rail vehicle's communication device which is designed to read and/or write the exclusive right of way or information associated with the exclusive right of way can likewise be of active or passive design.
Another development is that, to enter the line section, the exclusive right is read from the first storage device and stored by the rail vehicle.
In this case the exclusive right of way can be “carried away” and possibly stored in the second storage device (“passed”) by the rail vehicle as it leaves the line section. Figuratively speaking, the rail vehicle therefore transports the exclusive right of way from the first to the second storage device. There are a plurality of technical implementations that allow this kind of functional “transportation” of the exclusive right of way. For example, approaches can be used which assign and administer a token in order to ensure (temporary) exclusivity of a resource, in this case of the line section.
It should be noted at this juncture that the first and second storage device can of course be interchangeable. In particular, they can essentially be implemented in a functionally symmetrical manner, i.e. both storage devices are designed to provide the exclusive right of way and, having done so, be unable to provide the exclusive right of way again until the exclusive right of way has been designated—e.g. by means of the rail vehicle—as “providable”, e.g. reset or stored. However, if these two storage devices are to control exclusive running on a line section, always only one or else neither of the two can provide the exclusive right of way when a rail vehicle enters the section. This ensures train protection in a reciprocal manner for alternating operation on the line section.
As part of an additional development, once the exclusive right of way has been read, the exclusive right of way is marked as invalid, overwritten, reset or deleted in the first storage device.
These are some possibilities for implementing an exclusive right of way in the storage device. For example, a memory area, e.g. a number of bits, a flag, a marker, etc. may be suitable for this purpose.
Basically any mechanism can be provided which ensures that, once the exclusive right of way has been provided, it can no longer be provided by the first storage device. Preferably the exclusive right of way cannot be provided again until it has first been made available again to the first storage device, e.g. is stored therein.
Another development consists in that the rail vehicle has a communication device for reading from and writing to the first and the second storage device.
One embodiment is that the rail vehicle is braked if it has not received the exclusive right of way on entering the line section.
In particular, the rail vehicle can be equipped with a monitoring device which in this case initiates a braking operation, e.g. forced braking. In addition, a warning can be output or triggered.
An alternative embodiment consists in that the exclusive right of way comprises, in particular, a signal, a token, a value, an item of information.
Another embodiment is that the exclusive right of way and/or the operations involving the exclusive right of way are executed with data security.
For example, the exclusive right of way can be signed and/or encrypted. Alternatively or in addition, access to the exclusive right of way can be allowed subject to authorization, i.e. the rail vehicle and/or the driver must first be authorized, for example. In particular, one option is that the exclusive right of way is implemented in a tamper-proof manner.
One embodiment is also that a state of the first storage unit and/or of the second storage unit relating to the availability of the exclusive right of way is displayed.
For example, a light and/or signal device can be provided which already indicates e.g. to a driver in the station whether the exclusive right of way is available and whether the rail vehicle can enter the line section. This is advantageous if the storage unit has already been located e.g. at the start of the actual section: this can prevent the situation whereby the rail vehicle sets off and then has to stop or reverse if the exclusive right of way is not available.
The statements relating to the method apply accordingly to the other claim categories.
The above mentioned object is also achieved by an apparatus for providing an exclusive right of way for controlling rail vehicles,
The apparatus can have a memory which is designed at least for temporarily storing the exclusive right of way.
In particular a plurality of, e.g. two, such apparatuses can be disposed along the line section, e.g. at the ends of a line section which may only be traversed if an exclusive right of way is obtained. This apparatus can be the above described storage device or rather said storage device can be incorporated in said apparatus.
One embodiment consists in that the communication device is a near field communication device.
In another embodiment, the rail vehicle is not provided with the exclusive right of way on the line section by means of the communication device if the exclusive right of way is not providable, in particular present in the memory (e.g. not stored or not set as providable).
A development consists in that the communication device is provided with the exclusive right of way by means of the rail vehicle when it exits the line section, e.g. it is thereby transmitted, set or stored in the memory of the apparatus.
The above mentioned object is also achieved by means of a rail vehicle
In a development, the rail vehicle has a monitoring device by means of which a predetermined action can be carried out, in particular issuing of a warning or initiation of a braking operation, if the line section is entered without exclusive right of way having been obtained.
The solution presented here also includes a computer program product which can be directly loaded into a memory of a digital computer, comprising program code sections which are suitable for executing steps of the method described here.
The abovementioned problem can also be solved by means of a computer-readable storage medium, e.g. any type of memory, incorporating computer-executable instructions (e.g. in the form of program code) which are suitable for computer execution of steps of the method described here.
The storage device, apparatus, communication device and/or monitoring device mentioned here can be implemented in particular as a processor unit and/or an at least partially hardwired or logical circuit arrangement which is designed, for example, such that the method as described herein can be carried out. This can be any kind of processor or PC or computer having the necessary peripherals (memory, input/output interfaces, I/O devices, etc.) or include such.
The above described characteristics, features, and advantages of the invention as well as the way in which they can be achieved will become clearer and more readily understandable in conjunction with the following schematic description of exemplary embodiments which will be explained in greater detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. For clarity, elements that are identical or have an identical effect are provided with the same reference characters.
For safe rail operation, e.g. over a single-track line section which is preferably used by rail vehicles running in different directions, an approach using a decentrally administered exclusive right of way is proposed.
(1) The exclusive right of way (e.g. by means of a “token”) for simplified traffic management is provided decentrally by electronic means, e.g. using an RFID tag, between the rail vehicles running in different directions over the single-track line section.
A token is a synchronization aid. The rail vehicle in possession of the token may access the resource, in this case traverse the line section. When the token is released, another rail vehicle may use the line section.
Also shown in
In the example according to
This scenario relates, for example, to the normal case. In particular situations (e.g. an emergency situation) the line section can be entered, e.g. subject to a written instruction from a signalman, with or without exclusive right of way.
If an invalid token is read, the RFID reader/writer is able to generate from the invalid token the valid token e.g. for storing in the second storage device at the end of the line section. This is e.g. possible for an initial situation in which the exclusive right of way is not yet present (either in the first or in the second storage device) and is provided e.g. via a (written) instruction from the signalman.
A rail vehicle 111 waiting in the opposite direction 112 on track 105 can now read the exclusive right of way 110 from the storage device 107 and carry it away (e.g. as explained previously, by the RFID tag of the storage device 107 being overwritten with an invalid code).
It should be noted here that the exclusive right of way 110 can include different signals, data, information and/or values. In particular, the exclusive right of way can take a plurality of forms and in some cases be provided with additional information. The exclusive right of way can include a count, for example, which indicates the number of movements on the line section 101 (possibly also according to direction).
(2) In addition to the remarks under (1), the rail vehicle 108 or 111 can have a monitoring device which can control the rail vehicle on the basis e.g. also of a read-in invalid (or not present) exclusive right of way (if e.g. the invalid code is read from the RFID tag). In this case a braking operation of the rail vehicle can be initiated, in particular forced braking. Alternatively or in addition, a warning (e.g. an indication, an alarm, etc.) can be output or triggered.
For initialization and disruption situations, the monitoring device preferably has an operator control device enabling the driver (possibly on instructions from a signalman or an interlocking) to override the train control system.
(3) Another option is that it is possible for each RFID tag to be reset to an invalid value. Such resetting can be performed e.g. centrally by a signalman or an interlocking, or a signaling system, or decentrally by the driver (possibly as instructed by a signalman). This enables initialization to be carried out: if e.g. two trains are to run consecutively in the same travel direction, the initial situation of the RFID tags must be established in both stations (at both ends of the line section 101) prior to departure of the second train.
Initialization can take place, for example, such that both exclusive rights of way are set to “invalid” (e.g. the RFID tags are assigned an invalid code). With train protection according to (2), the driver of the first train to depart obtains permission to proceed from the traffic manager together with the instruction to override the train control system. On leaving the line section 101 the rail vehicle can then supply the storage device 106 or 107 with a valid exclusive right of way (e.g. the RFID tag is in this case assigned a valid code), so that, from then on, this storage device can provide the exclusive right of way for the line section 101.
(4) Another option consists in that the storage devices 106 and 107 installed on the line section indicate the states of the stored exclusive rights of way (e.g. “train movement possible” or “line section barred”) or make them available to a display, or a light source. In particular, another component, e.g. a signal, can be provided which receives the state of the respective exclusive right of way from the storage device or reads it therefrom and displays the read-out state. Thus a driver of a rail vehicle can see even in the station whether he can obtain an exclusive right of way from the storage device and therefore enter the line section. In particular, the safety of a correct permission to proceed for the rail vehicle can be ensured in conjunction with the train stop function from (2).
In a step 501 a rail vehicle intends to enter the line section. In a step 502 it is ascertained e.g. at the entrance to the line section or in advance by means of signaling whether an exclusive right of way on the line section can be provided by a storage device which is preferably disposed at one end of the line section. If no such exclusive right of way is available, the flow chart branches to step 503, running on the line section is not permissible; the rail vehicle may have to wait until exclusive right of way is available or—if it is already en route—a predefined action, e.g. a warning or an alarm is triggered and/or a braking operation is initiated.
On the other hand, if the exclusive right of way is available, the flow chart branches to step 504, the rail vehicle reads the exclusive right of way from the storage device and ensures that the exclusive right of way can no longer be made available by the storage device. In a step 505 the rail vehicle enters the line section. In a step 506, e.g. shortly before or shortly after leaving the line section, the rail vehicle returns the exclusive right of way to the storage device there, or ensures that said storage device can grant exclusive right of way as soon as the rail vehicle has left the line section. In steps 504 to 506 the exclusive right of way is therefore transported between the two storage devices which are provided to protect the line section. As stated, there are a plurality of possibilities for ensuring the functionality of “transportation” of this kind.
It should be noted here that an antenna of the communication unit 603 can be mounted e.g. on the roof of the vehicle or underneath the rail vehicle 601. In particular, electrical and/or mechanical means, e.g. sensors, actuators, can be provided for communication purposes.
It should also be noted that only the communication devices of the storage device are disposed on or in the vicinity of the stretch of line; the rest of the storage device can be located elsewhere. A communication device of this kind is advantageously disposed so as to be contactable by the rail vehicle. There are a plurality of electrical and/or mechanical possibilities for implementing contactability of this kind. In particular, the storage device can also be of distributed design in this respect.
It is advantageous here that, for simplified traffic management, the exclusive right of way can be transferred decentrally by electronic means, e.g. via RFID tags, between rail vehicles plying alternately on a single-track line section. This thus managed exclusive right of way can also be used for controlling the rail vehicle (e.g. initiating or carrying out a braking operation).
Another advantage is that this solution requires neither interlocking equipment, track clear indications in the traditional sense, data radio, nor signals. Inexpensive, automatic simplified traffic management can therefore be achieved for alternating traffic on single-track line sections.
For example, for transferring the exclusive rights of way, storage devices having RFID tags can be provided after the last switch after departure from the station.
Decentralized control by means of an exclusive right of way (token) is proposed for rail vehicles running in alternate directions on a single-track line section, e.g. between two stations. For this purpose a storage device, e.g. as an RFID unit, is preferably disposed at either end of the line section, wherein only one exclusive right of way for the vacant line section exists which is kept either in one of the two storage units or is carried by a rail vehicle running on the line section. In the latter case, the line section is therefore effectively protected from being entered by another rail vehicle, because neither of the storage units can provide the exclusive right of way which is being transported by the rail vehicle between the storage units or more precisely is in the possession of the rail vehicle. It is advantageous here that the solution presented creates an efficient possibility of decentralized train protection and can therefore be implemented much more cost effectively than existing central train protection or simplified traffic management approaches.
Although the invention has been illustrated and described in detail by at least one exemplary embodiment shown, the invention is not limited thereto and other variations can be deduced therefrom by the person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of protection sought for the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 216 744 | Sep 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/068340 | 9/5/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/044541 | 3/27/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2617014 | Judge | Nov 1952 | A |
2703839 | Judge | Mar 1955 | A |
2874272 | Staples | Feb 1959 | A |
2916612 | Marple | Dec 1959 | A |
3286091 | Ferm | Nov 1966 | A |
4538781 | Birkin | Sep 1985 | A |
5437422 | Newman | Aug 1995 | A |
5947423 | Clifton | Sep 1999 | A |
7099754 | Sugita | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20050149795 | Manoni | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050240322 | Peltz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20080068164 | Campbell | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20120004796 | Michaut | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20150353110 | Kernwein | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3347180 | Jul 1984 | DE |
19749697 | Apr 1999 | DE |
0076672 | Apr 1983 | EP |
1075995 | Feb 2001 | EP |
286108 | Mar 1928 | GB |
2134295 | Dec 1983 | GB |
H026268 | Jan 1990 | JP |
2007036468 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wennrich R. “Der Elektronische Token fuer die Agyptischen Eisenbahnen” Signal + Draht, telzlaff Verlag GmbH, Darmstadt, vol. 89, No. aa pp. 30-34, ISSN; 0037-4997, xp000779911, 1997, DE. |
Railway Group Standard: Radio Electronic Token Block, Railway Group Standard, URL; http//www.rgsonline.co.uk/railway_Group_Standards/Control Command and Signaling/railway Group Standards/GKRT0054ISS1.pdf; pp. 1-18;XP055106801;1998;GB. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150274185 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |