Corrosion inhibitive pretreatment for "copper-free" mirrors

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5008153
  • Patent Number
    5,008,153
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 8, 1988
    36 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 16, 1991
    33 years ago
Abstract
A pretreatment composition comprising a combination of an adhesion promoter and corrosion inhibitor which is applied to the surface of a substrate and a process for pretreating the surface of a substrate before the deposition of thin metallic films to prepare mirrored substrates.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to protective coatings for thin films of metals, such as silver or aluminum, a combination of silver and copper, or the like, which are applied to substrates. More specifically, the present invention relates to pretreatment compositions for thin metallic films, such as silver, which are applied to substrates such as glass.
2. Brief Description of the Prior Art
It is known in the art to deposit thin metallic films on substrates for functional and/or aesthetic reasons. For example, thin films of silver are deposited on glass to produce mirrors or other reflective surfaces for purposes such as energy conservation. Depending on the intended use, the thin metallic films may vary widely in thickness. For example, the metallic films on mirrors typically vary in thickness and range from about 3 to about 10 microinches (from about 76.2 to about 254 millimicrons) whereas partially reflective metallic films on windows, where the films serve as solar reflectors, vary in thickness and range from about 4.times.10.sup.-8 inches to about 20.times.10.sup.-8 inches (about 1 to about 5.1 millimicrons).
To preserve the integrity of the thin metallic films, protective materials in the form of, say, additives, pertinent among which are corrosion inhibitors, are employed therewith. Conventionally, protective materials, typically incorporated in coatings, are applied to the back of the metallic films. This mode of application is herein denoted as a "conventional" application. In contrast, the protective materials of this invention are applied as pretreatment compositions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the foregoing, the present invention encompasses a pretreatment composition for enhancing the corrosion resistance of a substrate, said composition is applied prior to the deposition of a thin metallic film on the substrate. The pretreatment composition comprises a combination of:
(A) an adhesion promoter and
(B) a corrosion inhibitor
wherein (A) is selected from the group consisting of an organo-functional silane compound, a titanium compound, a zirconium compound, and a mixture thereof, and (B) is selected from the group consisting of a nitrogen containing heterocyclic compound, a metallic compound, and a mixture thereof. This mode of application is herein denoted as a "pretreatment" application.
The present invention further encompasses an improved method of preparing substrates coated with thin metallic films by depositing the thin metallic films on the substrate, the improvement comprising applying a protective material to the substrate before the thin metallic film is applied.
Also, the present invention encompasses an article of matter prepared with the composition or method of the present invention. Particularly suited to this invention are mirrors and methods of preparing the same by treating the surface of glass before depositing thereon a thin metallic film of silver. An article of matter which is prepared by the present invention exhibits a marked improvement in the properties of adhesion and corrosion resistance and other desirable properties.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
As aforestated, the present invention is a pretreatment composition comprising a combination of (A) an adhesion promoter and (B) a corrosion inhibitor; said composition typically comprises a carrier. The nature and amount of the adhesion promoter or the corrosion inhibitor depend on each other and the carrier that may be present therewith. The adhesion promoters which are useful herein are selected on the basis that they provide bonding or coupling to the interface of the substrate and the thin metallic film. The corrosion inhibiting agents are selected on the basis that they prevent degradation, particularly chemical degradation, of the thin metallic film. Also, determinative in making the selection is the compatibility of the adhesion promoter or corrosion inhibitor with the carrier. By "compatible" is meant that the combination of adhesion promoter and the corrosion inhibitor is soluble in, or in phase with, the carrier.
In the present embodiment of the invention, the adhesion promoter can be selected from the group consisting of a functional silane compound, titanium compound, zirconium compound, and a mixture thereof.
Non-limiting examples of the silane compounds useful herein can be organo silanes such as amino alkyl and/or mercapto alkyl silanes, e.g., gamma-aminopropyltriethoxy silane, aminopropyltrimethoxy silane, N-beta(aminoethyl)-gamma-aminopropyltrimethoxy silane, and gamma-mercaptopropyltrimethoxy silane. Based on the teachings herein, other silane compounds useful herein can be found in SILANE COUPLING AGENTS by Edwin P. Plueddemann, New York, Plenum Press (1982), which is incorporated herein by reference.
Non-limiting examples of the functional zirconium compounds useful herein can be organo zirconium compounds such as zirconates. Particularly preferred herein are compounds such as neoalkoxy tris(ethylene diamino)ethyl zirconates. Based on the teachings herein, other zirconium compounds useful herein are coupling agents such as disclosed in the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, Second Edition by Kirk & Othmer, Vol. 22, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Non-limiting examples of the titanium compounds useful herein can be organic titanates, titanium chelates, and coordination compounds. Particularly preferred herein are bis(2,4-pentanedionato-0,0') bis(2-propanolato)-titanium (iv); bis [2,2',2"-nitrilo tris[ethanolato]](1-)-N,O]bis(2propanolato)-titanium (iv). Based on the teachings herein, other titanium compounds useful herein are coupling agents such as disclosed in the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, Second Edition, by Kirk & Othmer, Vol. 20, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Corrosion inhibitors useful herein can be substituted or unsubstituted heterocyclic nitrogen containing compounds, particularly the five-membered compounds. The substituent should be that which does not adversely affect the reaction thereof or the performance of the pretreatment composition. Typical substituents can be a mercapto, amino or carboxyl groups.
Non-limiting examples thereof can be selected from the group consisting of benzotriazole; 2-mercaptothiazole; 2-amino-1,2,4 triazole; 2,5-dimercapto-1,3,4 thiadiazole, and 2-aminothiazole; 2-mercaptothiazoline and 2-aminothiazoline. Preferred herein as a corrosion inhibitor are heterocyclic mercapto carboxylic acid esters and anhydrides such as (2-benzimidazolylthio) succinic acid, or (2-thio-2'-benzo-thiazolyl)butanedioic acid. Based on the teachings herein, other corrosion inhibitors useful herein can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,612,049, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The metallic compounds (other than zirconium or titanium compounds) useful herein can be corrosion inhibitive organic or inorganic metallic compounds such as lead salts, zinc salts, calcium salts, and the like.
Carriers are employed herewith for ease of preparation or application. Liquid carriers which are capable of wetting the substrate are preferred herein. The carriers are typically solvents, although resinous carriers, e.g., resinous polyols, can be employed. The preferred carriers are polar solvents. Examples of useful carriers can be water, alcohol, preferably lower alcohols, or a mixture thereof. Specific examples of the alcohols can be ethanol, which is preferred, methanol, isopropanol, butanol, glycol ethers, such as propylene glycol monobutyl ether.
In preparing the solution-based compositions of this invention, the combination of the adhesion promoter and corrosion inhibitor can be introduced into a common solvent separately or together. Alternately, different solvents can be employed. The combination can be a physical admixture or chemical composition of the adhesion promoter and the corrosion inhibitor. The weight ratio of the adhesion promoter to the corrosion inhibitor is from about 2:1 to 4:1 and preferably from about 3.5:1 to 4.5:1.
In the practice of this invention, the solution-based pretreatment composition is employed at application solids of about 2 to 5 percent or higher and preferably about 3.0 to 5.0 percent of total composition, and at pH of about 8 to 12 and preferably about 8 to 10. When water is employed, its conductivity should be such as does not adversely affect the subsequent deposition of the thin metallic film on the pretreated substrate. Typically, the pretreated substrate is rinsed with deionized water before the deposition of the metallic film on the pretreated substrate.
In accordance with this invention, an article of matter can be prepared by depositing on a substrate the pretreatment composition comprising an adhesion promoter and a corrosion inhibitor as recited hereinabove, followed by depositing a thin metallic film on the pretreated substrate and optionally coating the metallic film with an organic coating. It has been found that the invention is particularly suitable for the preparation of mirrored substrates.
Surprisingly, it has been found that when the pretreatment composition is applied before the thin metallic film, one obtains mirrored substrates with marked improvement in adhesion and corrosion resistance. Hence, the present invention further encompasses an improved method of depositing a thin metallic film on the substrate, the improvement comprising pretreating the surface of the substrate with the pretreatment composition comprising a protective material, before applying the thin metallic film. In this aspect of the invention, the pretreatment composition can be a protective material comprising an adhesion promoter, a corrosion inhibitor, or a combination thereof. In the use of an adhesion promoter and a corrosion inhibitor, one can apply them separately or together.
It would, of course, be realized that the adhesion promoter or corrosion inhibitor may be specific to a substrate. However, it is believed that given the teaching herein, one skilled in the art can select the appropriate protective material which can be an adhesion promoter or corrosion inhibitor and use them as pretreatment compositions in accordance with this invention.
Application of the pretreatment composition can entail dipping, spraying, flow coating, roll coating or the like. The thin metallic film is generally coated with mirror-back coatings. Illustrative examples of the mirror-back coatings can be organic coatings, e.g., conventional air-dry, force dry, or thermosetting alkyds, primers, sealer coats, and barrier coatings.
The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLE A
This example illustrates the pretreatment composition of this invention and methods of making and using the same.
A pretreatment composition of this invention was prepared with a solution of five parts by weight of 2-mercaptothiazoline in ethanol. Twenty parts by weight of the above solution was added to 76 parts by weight of deionized water followed by addition of 4 parts by weight of gamma-aminopropyltriethoxy silane (A-1100), available from Union Carbide Corporation.
The resultant composition was applied to the surface of a cleaned strip of glass (8".times.12") by flooding or spraying the surface. The strip of glass was then rinsed with deionized water. Thereafter, a thin film of silver (700-750A.degree.) (70-75 milligrams per square foot) was deposited on the glass by electroless deposition (spraying). The resulting mirror was air-dried and preheated to about 100.degree. F. A mirror backing made up of a clear lead-free vehicle comprising a resinous blend such as found in PPG Industries, Inc. (hereinafter "PPG"s) NEW GENERATION.RTM. coatings was then applied over the thin metallic film and cured at 260.degree. F. by infrared.
The resultant "copper-free" (silver-only) mirror was evaluated by copper chloride/acetic acid (five percent sodium chloride) salt spray (CASS) test and showed good corrosion resistance.
ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES
The pretreatment compositions of the following examples were prepared and applied in essentially the same manner as described in Example A.
EXAMPLE I
______________________________________Ingredients Parts per Hundred (pph)______________________________________Carrier(s).sup.(a) 95.0Substituted thiazoline.sup.(b) 1.0Silane.sup.(c) 4.0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Carrier(s): ethanol. .sup.(b) Robinson Brothers, Ltd. (RBL): 2thiazoline-thione. .sup.(c) Union Carbide: A1100, which is gammaaminopropyltriethoxysilane.
EXAMPLES 2 TO 5
______________________________________Ingredients Parts per Hundred (pph)______________________________________Carrier(s).sup.(a) 95.0Azole.sup.(b) 1.0Silane.sup.(c) 4.0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Carrier(s): ethanol. .sup.(b) Azole: (Example 2) Sherwin Williams: COBRATEC 99, (Example 3) Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc.: 2mercaptothiazole; (Example 4) Aldrich Chemical Co., Inc.: 2mercaptobenzothiazole; (Example 5) Eastman Kodak Co. 2aminothiazole. .sup.(c) Union Carbide: A1100.
EXAMPLE 6
______________________________________Ingredients Parts per Hundred (pph)______________________________________Carrier(s).sup.(a) 95.0Substituted carboxylic 1.0acid(s).sup.(b)Silane.sup.(c) 4.0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Carrier(s): Solvents: water/ethanol in a ratio of 76/19. .sup.(b) Ciba Geigy: IRGACOR 23252 (2thio-2'-benzothiazolyl)butanedioic acid. .sup.(c) Union Carbide: A1100.
EXAMPLES 7 AND 8
______________________________________Ingredients Parts per Hundred (pph)______________________________________Carrier(s).sup.(a) 95.0Substituted thiazoline.sup.(b) 1.0Titanate.sup.(c) 4.0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Carrier(s): Ethanol. .sup.(b) Robinson Brothers, Ltd.: 2thiazoline-thione. .sup.(c) DuPont Chemical Co. (titanium compounds): Tyzor AA (Example 7), Tyzor TE (Example 8).
EXAMPLE 9
______________________________________Ingredients Parts per Hundred (pph)______________________________________Carrier(s).sup.(a) 95.0Substituted thiazoline.sup.(b) 1.0Neoalkoxy zironate.sup.(c) 4.0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Carrier(s): Alcohol(s). .sup.(b) Robinson Brothers, Ltd.: 2thiazoline-thione. .sup.(c) Kenrich Chemical Co. (zirconium compound): LZ44: neoalkoxy tris(ethylene diamino)ethyl zirconate.
TEST DATA
The above composition was applied to glass prior to the deposition of silver-only (Ag) or silver/copper (Ag/Cu) mirrors coated with mirror-back coatings and cured. The resultant mirrors were evaluated and rated as follows:
______________________________________Key % Description byNumber Rating Failure Description Amount of Failure______________________________________10 (Best) 0 Excellent (Exc) No change/none 9 10 Very good-Exc Trace 8 20 Very good (VG) Very slight (VSL) 7 30 Good - VG Slight - VSL 6 40 Good (G) Slight (SL) 5 50 Fair - G Moderate - SL 4 60 Fair (F) Moderate (MOD) 3 70 Poor - F Considerable - MOD 2 80 Poor (P) Considerable (CON) 1 90 Very Poor - VP Severe - CON 0 100 Very Poor (VP) Severe (SEV)______________________________________
TABLE 1______________________________________ CASS Test.sup.(a) Ratings Pretreatment Edge Dela-Substrate Composition Corrosion.sup.(b) mination.sup.(c)______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 4 5Glass/Silver/Copper Composition of 8 8 Example 1Glass/Silver None 1 5Glass/Silver Composition of 5 8 Example 1______________________________________ .sup.(a) CASS Test: (Copperaccelerated-acetic acidsalt spray)/Modified (fourhour test). ASTMB368-68 for screening tests with clear (nonleaded) alkydmelamine coating system as found in PPG's NEW GENERATION .RTM. coatings. .sup.(b) Edge Corrosion: Rating of amount (millimeters) of corrosion on edge of panel (10 = Best) on a scale of 0 to 10. .sup.(c) Delamination: Rating of the amount of delamination of coating and/or coating + metal from panel.
TABLE 2______________________________________ CASS Test Ratings Pretreatment Edge Dela-Substrate Composition Corrosion mination______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 4 5Glass/Silver/Copper Composition of 8 8 Example 1Glass/Silver/Copper Composition of 7 8 Example 2Glass/Silver/Copper Composition of 7 8 Example 3Glass/Silver/Copper Composition of 6 7 Example 4______________________________________
TABLE 3______________________________________ Pretreatment CASS Test RatingsSubstrate Composition Edge Corrosion Delamination______________________________________Glass/Silver None 1 5Glass/Silver Composition 5 8 of Example 1Glass/Silver Composition 3 7 of Example 2Glass/Silver Composition 3 8 of Example 3Glass/Silver Composition 3 6 of Example 4Glass/Silver Composition 4 8 of Example 5______________________________________
TABLE 4______________________________________ CASS Test Ratings Pretreatment Edge Dela-Substrate Composition Corrosion mination______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 7 8Glass/Silver None 2 5Glass/Silver Composition of 9 6 Example 6______________________________________
TABLE 5______________________________________ CASS Test Ratings Pretreatment Edge Dela-Substrate Composition Corrosion mination______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 8 5Glass/Silver None 3 4Glass/Silver Composition of 10 7 Example 6Glass/Silver Composition of 4 8 Example 7Glass/Silver Composition of 6 5 Example 8______________________________________
TABLE 6______________________________________ CASS Test Ratings Pretreatment Edge Dela-Substrate Composition Corrosion mination______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 4 5Glass/Silver None 1 5Glass/Silver Composition of 4 8 Example 9______________________________________
TABLE 7______________________________________ CASS Test.sup.(a) Ratings Pretreatment Numerical % ofSubstrate Composition Rating Failure.sup.(b)______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 0 100Glass/Silver None 0 100Glass/Silver Composition of 8 20 Example 7Glass/Silver Composition of 7 30 Example 8Glass/Silver Composition of 4 60 Example 9______________________________________ .sup.(a) CASS Test: Modified ASTMB368-68 for screening studies using an alkydmelamine conventional thermosetting coating such as is available fro Reichold Chemical Co. Test used was: test to failure of controls. .sup.(b) Percent of Failure: Number rating corresponding to the percent o corrosion failure in the above test procedure.
TABLE 8______________________________________ CASS Test.sup.(a) Ratings Pretreatment Edge Dela-Substrate Composition Corrosion.sup.(b) mination.sup.(c)______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 4 9Glass/Silver None 2 9Glass/Silver Composition of 5 10 Example 1Glass/Silver Composition of 9 10 Example 6Glass/Silver Composition of 5 8 Example 7Glass/Silver Composition of 6 7 Example 8______________________________________ .sup.(a) CASS Test: Modified ASTMB368-68 for screening tests with clear water reducible conventional air dry alkyd system, available from Reichol Chemical Co. .sup.(b) Edge Corrosion: Refer to Example 1 footnote. .sup.(c) Delamination: Refer to Example 1 footnote.
TABLE 9______________________________________ CASS Test.sup.(a) Rating Pretreatment Edge NumericalSubstrate Composition Corrosion.sup.(b) (mm) Rating______________________________________Glass/Silver/ None 0.75 (7)CopperGlass/Silver None 2.0 (5)Glass/Silver Composition of 0.0 (10) Example 6Glass/Silver Composition of 0.5 (8) Example 8______________________________________ .sup.(a) CASS Test: Standard ASTMB368-68 for pigmented conventional thermosetting alkydmelamine coatings such as "NEW GENERATION .RTM." coatings containing corrosion inhibitors. .sup.(b) Edge Corrosion: Millimeters of corrosion measured and the corresponding numerical rating.
TABLE 10__________________________________________________________________________ Salt Spray.sup.(a) Test Pretreatment 150 Hours.sup.(b) 300 Hours.sup.(c)Substrate Composition Edge Corrosion Delamination Edge Corrosion Delamination__________________________________________________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 9 10 9 10Glass/Silver None 6 5 2 5Glass/Silver Composition of 9 8 9 8 Example 6Glass/Silver Composition of 10 10 9 10 Example 7Glass/Silver Composition of 10 10 9 10 Example 8__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.(a) Salt Spray Test: U.S. Government Standard DDM411b 20 percent salt used with standard conventional thermosetting coatings (pigmented). .sup.(b) 150 Hours: Initial screening using DDM411b. .sup.(c) 300 Hours: Extended test >150 hours.
TABLE 11______________________________________ Pretreatment CASS Test.sup.(a) RatingSubstrate Composition Edge Corrosion______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 8Glass/Silver None 5Glass/Silver Composition of 8 Example 7Glass/Silver Composition of 9 Example 8______________________________________ .sup.(a) CASS Test: Standard ASTMB368-68 for conventional air dry/force dry alkyd type, such as is available from PPG Industries, Inc. as MIRO-CRON .RTM. mirror-back coatings.
TABLE 12______________________________________ Pretreatment Salt Spray.sup.(a)Substrate Composition Edge Corrosion______________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 9Glass/Silver None 3Glass/Silver Composition of 8 Example 6Glass/Silver Composition of 5 Example 7Glass/Silver Composition of 9 Example 8______________________________________ .sup.(a) DDM-411b Standard 20 percent salt used with standard conventional air dry/force dry MIRO-CRON .RTM. coating.
TABLE 13*__________________________________________________________________________TEST RESULTS OF MIRROR-BACK COATINGS.sup.(a)ON UNTREATED VS. TREATED MIRROR SUBSTRATEMirror- DFT Adhesion.sup.(b) Humidity.sup.(c) NH.sub.3 + S.S..sup.(d) CASS.sup.(e) Salt Spray-150 Hours.sup.(f)Type Pretreatment (Mils) (Cross Hatch) (Blisters) (Edge UC/Spots) (Edge UC/Spots) (Edge UC/Spots) ("X"-Scribe)__________________________________________________________________________Ag/Cu None 1.5 4 None 6.0/8F <0.25/8VF 0.0/8VF <0.25Ag-only None 1.5 4 None >10.0/-- 2.8/4F 8.0/4VF 8.0Ag-only Composition 1.5 4 None 0.0/8VF <0.25/8-10VF 0.0/None 0.0 of Ex. 6__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.(a) NEW GENERATION .RTM. Mirror Backing applied at 1.5 mils dry. .sup.(b) Adhesion based on ASTMD3359 Ratings (5 = Best on a scale of 0 t 5). .sup.(c) Humidity Condensing humidity test @ 60.degree. C./150 hours ratings based on ASTMD714 (Blisters). .sup.(d) NH.sub.3 + S.S. Ammonia + Salt Spray Test ratings are millimeters of edge undercutting (UC) and size and number of spots on mirror face. .sup.(e) CASS based on ASTMB368-68 ratings are the same as above. .sup.(f) Salt Spray 150 hours based on Government Standard Test DDM114b ratings are in millimeters on edge under cutting (UC) size and number of spots and "X"-scribe rating is millimeters of corrosion extending from th scribe mark. *The numbers here are actual measurements.
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________ Pretreatment CASS Test.sup.(a) RatingsSubstrate Composition Edge Corrosion.sup.(b) Delamination.sup.(e)__________________________________________________________________________Glass/Silver/Copper None 4 5Glass/Silver None 1 5Glass/Silver A-1100 (Alone).sup.(d) 4 10Glass/Silver 2-Mercaptothiazoline 3 7 (Alone).sup.(e)Glass/Silver Composition of Example 1 6 7Glass/Silver A-1100 + 2-Mercaptothiazoline.sup.(f) 6 8Glass/Silver 2-Mercaptothiazoline (Post).sup.(g) 4 6__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.(a) ASTM-B368-68 for screening tests with clear (nonleaded) alkydmelamine coating system as found in PPG's NEW GENERATION .RTM. coatings. .sup.(b) Edge Corrosion: Rating of amount (millimeters) of corrosion on edge of panel (10 = Best) on a scale of 0 to 10. .sup.(c) Delamination: Rating of the amount of delamination of coating and/or coating + metal from the panel. .sup.(d) A-1100: 4 percent of gammaaminopropyltriethoxy silane in ethanol .sup.(e) 2-mercaptothiazoline: 1 percent solution in ethanol. .sup.(f) A-1100 was applied first and then the 2mercaptothiazoline was applied as separate steps. .sup.(g) Post: Denotes that a 1% solution of 2mercaptothiazoline was applied directly to the metallic film in contrast with prior application before deposition of the metallic film.
Claims
  • 1. An improved process of depositing a thin metallic film on a substrate by applying to the substrate a thin metallic film the improvement comprising pretreating the surface of the substrate with a pretreatment composition comprising a protective material before applying the thin metallic film to the substrate, said pretreatment composition comprising
  • (A) an adhesion promoter bonding or coupling to the interface of the substrate and the thin metallic film and
  • (B) a corrosion inhibitor wherein (A) is selected from the group consisting of a silane compound, a titanium compound, a zirconium compound, and a mixture thereof, and (B) is selected from the group consisting of a nitrogen containing heterocyclic compound, a corrosion inhibitive metallic compound other than recited in (A) and a mixture thereof.
  • 2. An improved process of depositing a thin metallic film of claim 1 wherein the protective material comprises an adhesion promoter and a corrosion inhibitor.
  • 3. An improved process of claim 1 further comprising rinsing the pretreated substrate before depositing the thin metallic film thereon.
  • 4. An improved process of claim 3 wherein rinsing is conducted with deionized water.
  • 5. An improved process of claim 1 which further comprises depositing an organic coating over the thin metallic film.
  • 6. An improved process of claim 5 wherein the organic coating is an alkyd/melamine coating.
  • 7. An article of matter which is prepared by the process of claim 1.
  • 8. An article of matter which is prepared by the process of claim 5.
  • 9. An article of matter of claim 8 wherein the substrate is glass.
  • 10. An article of matter of claim 1 wherein the substrate is plastic.
  • 11. An article of matter of claim 8 wherein the thin metallic film is a layer of silver or layer of silver followed by a layer of copper.
US Referenced Citations (29)
Number Name Date Kind
2316011 Miller et al. Apr 1943
2393801 Morey et al. Jan 1946
2719827 Lowe Oct 1955
3395036 Campbell Jul 1968
3837964 Cotton et al. Sep 1974
4154638 Franz May 1979
4246320 Coll-Palogos Jan 1981
4247330 Sanders Jan 1981
4255214 Workens Mar 1981
4297447 Yasuda Oct 1981
4339553 Yoshimura et al. Jul 1982
4343660 Martin Aug 1982
4349421 Khattab Sep 1982
4350804 Ostrowski et al. Sep 1982
4357396 Grunewalder et al. Nov 1982
4402847 Wilson Sep 1983
4465547 Belke, Jr. et al. Aug 1984
4495247 Vasta Jan 1985
4612049 Berner et al. Sep 1986
4612236 Hsu Sep 1986
4645714 Roche Feb 1987
4656097 Claffey et al. Apr 1987
4714564 Lynch et al. Dec 1987
4721747 Doshi Jan 1988
4725501 Rukavina Feb 1988
4749741 Saito Jun 1988
4770727 Siegl Sep 1988
4790878 Siegl Dec 1988
4808483 Nakasuji Feb 1989
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
58-130283 Aug 1983 JPX
58-50941 Nov 1983 JPX
1097576 Jun 1984 SUX
1050785 Dec 1966 GBX
1057871 Feb 1967 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Corrosion Science, "Short Communication--2-Mercaptothiazoline as Corrosion Inhibitor for Copper in Acidic Media" (1974), vol. 14, pp. 233-237 by A. B. Patel et al.
Journal of Electrochemical Society of India, "Some Azoles as Corrosion Inhibitors for Copper, Brass and Aluminum" by K. P. Soni and I. M. Bhatt, 32-2[1983], pp. 197-199.
Journal of Coatings Technology, "Organosilanes as Adhesion Promoters for Organic Coatings", presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Federation of Societies for Coatings Technology in Atlanta, Ga., Oct. 1980, by Peter Walker.