Priority is claimed to European Patent Application No. EP 23165472.4, filed on Mar. 30, 2023, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention relates to the technical field of electrochemical methods, whether by electrodissolution or by electrodeposition, and in particular to a method consisting in using a deformable counter-electrode that adapts to the geometry of a conductive part to be treated, such as a metal part or surface, or even a plastic part or surface filled with metallic particles, so as to promote a homogeneous surface treatment over the entire surface of the part.
Electrochemical methods such as electrodissolution and electrodeposition are very widely used in the field of surface finishing of metal parts. These methods are very versatile and allow to treat parts with simple or more complex geometries, whether in a continuous or discontinuous method. Many works or publications describe good practices for implementing these methods.
Electrodissolution methods allow to remove surface material from a conductive part by anode polarization thereof in an appropriate medium. Electrodissolution can be used in particular for machining (electrochemical machining), deburring (electrolytic deburring), surface texturing or roughness reduction (electropolishing). For example, it is necessary in many cases to reduce the roughness of metal parts, since such roughness has a negative impact on:
Electrodissolution methods can be applied on the majority of conductive surfaces (steels, alloys of aluminum, titanium, copper, nickel, etc.).
Electrodeposition methods allow to deposit material on a conductive surface by polarization, generally cathode polarization, thereof in an appropriate medium. Electrodeposition is used in the majority of cases to deposit metallic coatings or composite coatings with a metallic matrix, but also allows to generate polymer coatings (electropolymerization) or ceramic coatings (for example, oxide electrodeposition by base generation). As an example, metallic coatings applied by electrodeposition are used in order to improve specific properties of a part, such as:
The large majority of conductive surfaces can be used as a substrate in an electrodeposition method.
The surface treatment by electrodissolution or electrodeposition is a particularly complex issue in the context of additive manufacturing. The latter allows to produce metal parts with complex to very complex geometries. This technique is particularly adapted to parts/products in small series and with high added value. Therefore, the main markets are currently aeronautics, aerospace, the medical field, the military or the energy sector. The parts produced by this technique have high roughness (about 10 to 120 μm Ra, to mention an order of magnitude) in the majority of cases. They are therefore easy to differentiate from foundry parts. Some applications of these parts are compatible with a high roughness, of the level observed upon exiting a machine. Nevertheless, lower roughness is required for the majority of these applications.
It is well known from the state of the art that the kinetics of the dissolution or deposition electrochemical reactions in the methods previously disclosed are proportional to the flow of electric charges received, that is, to the electric current. In the majority of cases, a homogeneous (or otherwise controlled) treatment of the part is sought, characterized by a uniform quantity of material removed or deposited at all points of the part. This therefore requires that the total current applied is distributed as homogeneously as possible over the surface of the part.
It is also well known from the state of the art that the distribution of the current applied between a part having a given geometry and a counter-electrode depends on the geometry of the cell and on the distance between the surface of the part and the counter-electrode (primary current distribution, described by Ohm's law). The characteristics of the electrolyte, the activation overloads at the electrodes as well as the local hydrodynamic conditions in the cell also affect the distribution of the current. In many cases, the primary current distribution constitutes the dominant contribution and allows to evaluate the actual distribution of the current with a good approximation. To favor homogeneous treatment, it is therefore necessary to control the geometry of the electrochemical cell, and in particular, the distance between the part to be treated and its counter-electrode.
Other surface treatment techniques exist to achieve the surface finishing of conductive parts by removing material:
Hirtenberger: an Austrian company offering a surface-finishing machine that uses chemical and electrochemical methods to treat metal parts (EP3551787A1, EP3551786B1, EP33077925B1, WO2020/079245A1);
Extrudehone: a German company that offers surface-finishing techniques of the AFM (Abrasive Flow Machining) type and electrolytic deburring (WO2010/039491A2) as well as a surface-finishing method derived from the electrochemical machining technology (Coolpulse™ method);
Micro Machining Process (MMP): a French-Swiss company that offers a secret method. No patent could be found;
Gpa Innova (Drylite™ method): a Spanish company that offers a surface-finishing method by electrodissolution. The particularity is that the electrolyte, which specifically conducts the current, is contained in a porous solid material. It is therefore a fairly homogeneous method but it is costly (US2020/270761A1, ES2604830B1, ES2682524A1, ES2721170B2, ES2860348A1, etc.).
These commercial methods ordinarily require a first cell development or treatment step before the part can be treated.
It is well known from the state of the art that the main limitation of electrochemical finishing methods is the difficulty to guarantee the homogeneous treatment of the treated part, or of the treated parts in the case of a batch. The difficulty is even more pronounced when the part has complex geometry. The ability to obtain homogeneous treatment is based on the know-how of the person skilled in the art and in all cases requires technical/economic arbitration between the time dedicated to optimizing the treatment cell and the benefit expected in terms of treatment quality.
Electrochemical finishing methods are implemented in several different ways, based on the size and geometry of the parts as well as the size of the batches. In particular, the parts may be treated:
Bulk treatment has the advantage that it does not require to adapt the cell to the shape of the parts. The tradeoff is that there is no real control over current distribution and therefore over the removal or addition of material. Only the random nature of the motion of the parts in the barrel allows some homogeneity of the treatment. It is therefore a statistical approach. This approach is reserved for batches of low-mass parts whose geometry is not overly complex.
In the case of attached treatments, the distribution and orientation of the parts on the frame will be decisive to control the current distribution and guarantee that all parts are treated equivalently. Quite often, it is necessary to adapt the geometry of the counter-electrode. This is done by adding auxiliary counter-electrodes, placed in well-defined positions, or “current thieves,” intended to homogenize the current distribution. This approach is also applied in the case of individual treatments.
The typical practice therefore consists in manufacturing, on a case-by-case basis, a counter-electrode with a shape that is adapted to the geometry of the treated parts. Thus, any change in the size or shape of the part requires manual modification of the cell. To do this, it is necessary to disassemble the electrodes in place and to modify or build new counter-electrodes. This operation is costly in terms of time and material. In fact, these counter-electrodes must be made of suitable material, quite often copper, stainless steel or even titanium with conductive oxide coating (MMO). These modifications inevitably cause treatment delays and excess costs.
Digital simulation software allow to anticipate and facilitate these modifications. However, the effort required for the simulation work must always be weighed against the benefits thereof. In practice, the use of digital tools is often not very profitable in the case of small batches of parts with highly variable geometries and is often reserved for larger batches of parts with high added value or for which the allowances to be achieved in terms of thickness removed or deposited require high precision. The solution adopted to modify the cells therefore often rests solely on the know-how and experience of the person skilled in the art and is achieved through trial and error.
The topic of surface finishing for metal parts by electrodissolution, when these parts are produced by additive manufacturing, is a much more recent subject, related to the fact that the additive-manufacturing technique itself is still relatively recent. There is therefore less literature on this subject. Nevertheless, patents dedicated to surface-finishing solutions for this type of parts are starting to be published, essentially about chemical solutions, and not specifically the method, such as for example AT520365A1, U.S. Pat. No. 11,136,688B1, US11, 118,283B2, etc
Identically, the topic of surface finishing for metal parts by electrodeposition, when these parts are produced by additive manufacturing, is a significantly more recent subject, related to the fact that the additive-manufacturing technique is still relatively recent. The available literature is therefore also more limited on this subject. Nevertheless, patents dedicated to surface-finishing solutions for these types of parts are starting to be published, essentially for chemical solutions (CN113477941A, for example) applications (U.S. Pat. No. 20,223,02571A1, for example), but not specifically for the method.
Prior art reports several applications for systems allowing to adapt to the shape of an object or to adapt the shape of an object. The following applications may thus be cited:
Prior art does not practically and effectively solve the problem of the recurring change from one shape or geometry to another in the context of electrochemical finishing methods. The change or adaptation of the treatment cell occurs manually and empirically, sometimes with the help of digital simulation results.
No reference identified in the prior art describes a method for automating the adaptation of the electrochemical cell. A broader search reveals inventions in the prior art for reproducing a surface geometry, in an analog or digital manner, for molding more flexibly a surface with which the object is placed in contact or for modifying the geometry of a device based on a plan using mechanical actuators. It was not possible to identify any invention allowing the positioning at a defined distance from the surface of a part that is not initially known.
In an embodiment, the present invention provides an electrochemical treatment method, comprising: implementing an electrolytic cell containing an electrolytic bath; and immersing an electrode and a deformable counter-electrode in the electrolytic bath, both the electrode and the deformable counter-electrode being connected to a source of continuous or pulsed current, the electrode comprising an electrically-conductive part and the counter-electrode being configured to be brought near the electrode, wherein a geometry of the deformable counter-electrode is adapted automatically, locally, and independently point by point, to a geometry of the electrically-conductive part before the electrochemical treatment is performed.
Subject matter of the present disclosure will be described in even greater detail below based on the exemplary figures. All features described and/or illustrated herein can be used alone or combined in different combinations. The features and advantages of various embodiments will become apparent by reading the following detailed description with reference to the attached drawings, which illustrate the following:
In an embodiment, the present invention provides a system and a method allowing to automatically adapt a cell for electrodissolution, electrodeposition, or any other method for electrochemical treatment, to the complex geometry of a conductive part. The system will allow to quickly and automatically pass from one geometry to another, thus allowing increased productivity and reduced costs to perform these treatments. The invention may also help develop electrochemical treatments, without having to worry about the effect of the counter-electrode on the method and the parameters developed.
Furthermore, according to an embodiment it is possible to adapt the invention to treat several parts in parallel.
A first aspect of the present invention relates to an electrochemical treatment method implementing an electrolytic cell containing an electrolytic bath in which an electrode and a deformable counter-electrode are immersed, both connected to a source of continuous or pulsed current, the electrode being made up of an electrically-conductive part and the counter-electrode being so designed that it can be brought near the electrode, wherein the geometry of the deformable counter-electrode is adapted automatically, locally and independently point by point, to the geometry of the electrically-conductive part before said electrochemical treatment occurs.
According to preferred embodiments of the invention, the method further comprises at least one of the following features or an appropriate combination thereof:
Another aspect of the present invention relates to an apparatus intended for implementing the aforementioned method, comprising at least the following elements:
According to preferred embodiments of the invention, the apparatus further comprises at least one of the following features or an appropriate combination thereof:
The invention also relates to a use of the aforementioned apparatus, in the context of an electrochemical treatment method for an electrically-conductive part, wherein:
In an embodiment the present invention uses a counter-electrode 10 having a series of conductive bars or tubes 1, that can slide through a grid or plate 2, pierced with holes in order to allow the sliding of the bars 1. The bars 1 are also electrically connected to a current source 3, necessary to ensure the electrochemical treatments.
This assembly shown in
These steps are also shown in
After treatment, the assembly made up of the grid 2 and bars 1 is retracted and placed back in initial position 6, optionally by bearing on a stop. This allows to advantageously eliminate any complex mechanical element. Furthermore, another advantage of the system is that it is not necessary to have or to account for any information regarding the initial geometry of the part.
With this system, it is thus always possible to ensure a more homogeneous distribution of the current on the surface of the part.
Embodiments of the invention describing an electrochemical cell 11 used for electrodissolution or electrodeposition, as shown schematically in
The cell comprises a series of bars 1 (
The bars may also have a size (diameter) ranging from several mm to several cm and be deposited in the space according to adapted density in order to homogeneously distribute the current. As an informal order of magnitude, a distribution from about one bar per cm2 (for the smallest bars) to about ten cm2 (for the largest bars) seems appropriate. The finer the bar distribution is and the higher the bar density is, the more homogeneous the current distribution is. However, the presence of too many bars risks disrupting the motion of the electrolyte flow.
The cell 11 also comprises a grid 2 (
Regarding the system for moving the bars 1 and/or the grid 2 bearing the bars 1, the grid 2 may be set in motion using a cylinder or any other mechanical, pneumatic or electric system, being or not mounted on a rail 5, while the bars 1 may be set in motion relative to the grid, with the grid 2 in this case remaining in the fixed position, either collectively, in particular if this positioning is done vertically, gravity constituting the driving force for moving the bars, or individually using any appropriate system (mechanical, electrical or pneumatic).
The aforementioned system of bars sliding within a fixed grid may also be replaced by a single system of bars performing both the required function for electrochemical treatment and for guiding the various bars. This allows to do without the fixed frame, while ensuring the function of the invention.
In an variant to the proposed system, an additional set of bars having a diameter that is larger than the diameter of the bars used in the grid may also be introduced between the bars 1 and the part to be treated 4, such that it is possible to ensure that no electrode is laterally too close to the part to be treated. These additional bars mold the shape of the part, then reproduce it on the bars 1 and are ultimately removed from the bath. The bars 1 thus placed are next positioned to perform the treatment.
Once the bars 1 mold the shape of the part 4 by contact therewith, they are next kept in place for example using cylinders, jaws (see below), using a stretched wire (see below), a magnetic system, etc.
The distance between the bars 1 and the part 4 can be adjusted according to the invention, from several mm to several cm, the chosen value being determined to allow limiting of the electrical resistance in the electrolyte and to ensure homogeneous distribution of the current.
Regarding the conductors required for the electrical connection of the bars, the connection may for example be achieved by wires preferably connected to the back of the bars by a system of jaws 21 (
The stirring of the electrolyte 7 must be set in motion and regularly brought around the part to be treated using a pump or any other system allowing liquids to be set in motion, for example one or several blades, etc. The inflow of electrolyte must be adapted to the volume of the bath and to the surface-treatment method and it must be brought to the part homogeneously, preferably from bottom to top.
A thermostating system 17 must be provided. The electrolyte 7 must be kept within its operating temperature range using a heating/cooling system. The power of the latter depends on the power used to perform the surface treatment, typically from 50 to 600 W/dm2 of part surface to be treated.
Regarding the composition of the tanks, in particular the walls of the treatment cell, they must be made of materials that are compatible with the electrolyte used for the treatments. They may therefore be made of a polymer material or of metal, depending on the case.
The atmosphere (12) above the cell may or may not be controlled. The surface treatment can cause the formation of various gases that may require to be evacuated. Adequate ventilation is therefore necessary. Some electrolytes are hygroscopic: it may therefore also be necessary to use a protective atmosphere over the system (N2 for example).
The electrolytes (or charge carriers) 7 may be in liquid or solid form.
The current source must bring adapted current and/or voltage. Depending on the use, the current will preferably range between 0.1 and 100 A/dm2. The voltage will preferably range between 1 and 600 V. The current may be applied continuously or pulsed for a duration ranging from 0.1 to 1000 ms.
The system according to the present invention may be used in the form of a surface-treatment machine implemented directly on site or not.
According to embodiment variants, the invention may also be comprise:
According to other embodiments of the invention, the proposed system may be used in order to:
According to still another embodiment of the invention, the electrolytic cell is a tubular cell, the two bottom walls of which would be movable, provided with a seal to ensure tightness and pierced so as to allow the electrodes to pass, with adequate tightness.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. It will be understood that changes and modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill within the scope of the following claims. In particular, the present invention covers further embodiments with any combination of features from different embodiments described above and below. Additionally, statements made herein characterizing the invention refer to an embodiment of the invention and not necessarily all embodiments.
The terms used in the claims should be construed to have the broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the foregoing description. For example, the use of the article “a” or “the” in introducing an element should not be interpreted as being exclusive of a plurality of elements. Likewise, the recitation of “or” should be interpreted as being inclusive, such that the recitation of “A or B” is not exclusive of “A and B,” unless it is clear from the context or the foregoing description that only one of A and B is intended. Further, the recitation of “at least one of A, B and C” should be interpreted as one or more of a group of elements consisting of A, B and C, and should not be interpreted as requiring at least one of each of the listed elements A, B and C, regardless of whether A, B and C are related as categories or otherwise. Moreover, the recitation of “A, B and/or C” or “at least one of A, B or C” should be interpreted as including any singular entity from the listed elements, e.g., A, any subset from the listed elements, e.g., A and B, or the entire list of elements A, B and C.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
23165472.4 | Mar 2023 | EP | regional |