Coupled positioners

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11273602
  • Patent Number
    11,273,602
  • Date Filed
    Monday, August 12, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 15, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Lonsberry; Hunter B
    • Greene; Daniel L
    Agents
    • Whitmyer IP Group LLC
Abstract
A manipulator system having a positioner having a primary rail, a first coupling linkage, and a second coupling linkage. The first coupling linkage couples the primary rail to a base and positions the primary rail along a first plane. The system has another positioner having a secondary rail, a third coupling linkage, and a fourth coupling linkage. The third coupling linkage couples the secondary rail to the base and positions the secondary rail along a second plane which is parallel to the first plane. A common link couples to the primary and secondary rails via linkages. Each of the second and fourth coupling linkages includes a joint for linear motion along the respective rail, and a revolute joint for relative pivoting between the respective rail and the common link. A position and orientation of the common link are adjustable by the joints and revolute joints.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present teachings relate to robotic manipulators in general and, more particularly, to such manipulators constructed to control the movement of an end effector with combined serial and parallel links as to impart high stiffness, speed, and precision and to support heavy loads.


BACKGROUND

Objective. A tool must be positioned at the correct place and angle to work on an object. To cut a piece of wood, for example, a saw must be placed in contact with the wood at a desired location and angle. Novel mechanisms manipulate a tool at desired position coordinates and orientation angles in three-dimensional (3D) space. Alternatively, the mechanisms may determine the 3D position and orientation of a tool.


Kinematic linkages. Kinematic linkages control the position of a manipulator's movable platform, or ‘end effector’, relative to its base. A ‘kinematic linkage’ is an assembly of rigid links connected by movable ‘revolute’ or ‘prismatic’ joints enabling relative rotary or linear motion, respectively. The relative positions of the links determine the angular or linear positions of ‘passive’ joints, whereas actuators directly control the angular or linear positions of ‘active’ joints. Joint axes can intersect or be collinear with each other. For example, a cylindrical joint is a revolute joint collinear with a prismatic joint. Two intersecting revolute joints form a 2-DOF (degree-of-freedom) universal joint. Three intersecting revolute joints form a 3-DOF (degree-of-freedom) wrist or spherical joint. The manipulator embodiments presented here are non-planar three-dimensional (3D) kinematic linkages.


‘Positioners’ vs. ‘manipulators’. Here, ‘manipulators’ are kinematic linkages that manipulate the position and orientation of tools in three dimensional space. Like our hands and arms manipulating a knife and fork for example. ‘Positioners’ are a subset of manipulators that position a point in three dimensional space. Like a 3-axis milling machine positioning the end of a cutting tool for example.


Serial manipulators. The kinematic linkages of ‘serial manipulators’ connect from the base to the movable platform in an open sequential chain. Serial manipulators typically have an overall large range of motion or ‘workspace’ since the workspaces of the kinematic linkages accumulate from the base to the movable platform. However, stiffness and precision of serial manipulators degrade cumulatively from the base to the movable platform. Compliance is the inverse of stiffness. The overall compliance of a serial connection is the sum of the compliances of the individual links and joints in the kinematic chain. Therefore, the overall compliance increases with the number of links and joints connected in series and so the overall stiffness decreases. The Cartesian positioner is a common serial manipulator, consisting of three active prismatic P joints (PPP) connected end-to-end and perpendicular to each other providing 3-DOF XYZ positioning control of an end effector. In joint notation ‘(PPP)’ parentheses enclose individual serial kinematic linkages and underlines P denote active actuated joints. Cylindrical (PRP), SCARA [1] (RRP), and 3-DOF articulated [2] (RRR) serial positioners also provide 3-DOF positioning control with actuated prismatic P and revolute R joints. Industrial articulated robot arms, with six actuated revolute R joints (RRRRRR), are also serial manipulators. They typically have a vertical axis revolute joint attached to a fixed base, followed by two horizontal axes revolute joints, for 3-DOF linear translation position control. Adding a 3-axes spherical wrist (RRR), consisting of three intersecting revolute joints, could add 3-DOF angular rotation control with easily solved inverse kinematics [2]. In general, adding a 1-axes, 2-axes or 3-axes wrist, in series with a linear positioning manipulator, is a common way of adding rotation control to extend a manipulator's number of degrees-of-freedom. By contrast, differential motions of coupled-positioners rotating the movable tool platform of the manipulator embodiments are disclosed here.


Parallel manipulators. Multiple independent kinematic linkages connect the movable platform of a ‘parallel manipulator’ [3, 4, 5] to its base, in a closed-loop. The kinematic chains of most parallel manipulators connect at three or six locations at the moveable tool platform. By contrast, the kinematic chains of the manipulator embodiments disclosed here connect to the moveable platform at two or four locations. Parallel manipulators typically have higher stiffness, speed and precision compared to serial manipulators. The overall stiffness of parallel connected kinematic chains is the sum of the stiffness of the individual kinematic chains. Therefore, the overall stiffness increases with the number of parallel connected kinematic chains. However, parallel connected manipulators typically have limited range, i.e. smaller workspace, compared to serial ones. The overall workspace of parallel manipulators is limited to the workspaces of the individual kinematic linkages.


The hexapod is a parallel manipulator, first introduced by Gough and later published by Stewart. The 6-6 Gough-Stewart hexapod platform consists of six actuated prismatic P joints connected separately between a fixed base and a tool platform with universal U and spherical S joints at each end and with joint notation 6-(UPS). The notation ‘6-(·)’ indicates that 6 serial kinematic linkages (·) connect in parallel. Non-underlined joints U, S are passive. Parallel connected manipulators have only one active joint per kinematic chain. The Delta robot, disclosed by Clavel is another parallel manipulator typically used for rapid, lightweight pick-and-place applications. It consists of three parallelograms made up of four spherical joints (SSSS) attached to the moving platform and actuated at the base by a link with revolute joints at each end 3-(RRSSSS). By replacing the RR sub-chain with an active prismatic joint P, Xiao and Torgny obtained a 3-(PSSSS) variant of the Delta robot that realized three-dimensional movement with linear actuators. A set of links connected to three linear carriages support the moving platform. Actuators adjust the positions of the carriages along three rails that determine the three-dimensional linear position of the platform. Wenger disclosed the ‘orthoglide’ that has three parallel connected identical kinematic chains 3-(PRPaR), where Pa stands for a parallelogram joint. Three mutually perpendicular actuated prismatic P joints translate the platform along three mutually perpendicular axes. Liu and Gao disclosed various kinematic structures for 2, 3, 4, 5-DOF parallel manipulator designs.


Kong disclosed a Cartesian parallel robot, known as the ‘tripteron’. Like conventional serial Cartesian gantry robots, the tripteron moves the linear position of a tool platform along three mutually perpendicular axes. The tripteron has the same simple kinematics as a gantry robot: i.e. the linear position of each actuator directly corresponds to the linear position, along the same axis, of the tool platform, and vice versa. Three separate two-link arms, with revolute joints at the ends of the links, connect the tool platform to the three mutually perpendicular prismatic joints in a 3-PRRR arrangement. Gosselin, Kong, and Seward extended the tripteron to 4-DOF, 5-DOF and 6-DOF manipulators known as ‘quadrupteron’, ‘pentapteron’ and ‘hexapteron’ respectively. Although the stiffness of the so called ‘multipteron’ family benefits from a parallel connection of kinematic chains, each chain is composed of serially connected links and joints which may compromise overall stiffness.


Hybrid serial-parallel manipulators, with combined serial and parallel links, may have a large range of motion (workspace) combined with high stiffness, speed, precision and may support heavy loads. For example, the ‘X’, ‘Y’ axes of 3-axes knee milling machines typically connect in series whereas the ‘Z’ axis connects in parallel. Many hybrid serial-parallel manipulators consist of a 1-axes, 2-axes or 3-axes angular wrist in series with a 3-axes linear positioning manipulator. For example, additional rotary actuators, around the ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ axes, in series with the ‘X’, ‘Y’, ‘Z’ axes, extend CNC milling machines to 4-axes, 5-axes or 6-axes control. However, the additional rotary actuators may be bulky and expensive. Similarly, Carlo extended the 3-axes orthoglide to 5-axes by adding a 2-axes wrist. The ‘tricept’ industrial robot is an example of a hybrid serial-parallel manipulator consisting of a 3-axes linear parallel connected manipulator 3-(RRPRRR) in series with a 3-axes actuated spherical wrist (RRR).


Tanev and Zheng disclosed hybrid serial-parallel manipulators consisting of two parallel manipulators connected in series. Each individual parallel manipulator has 3-DOF and together, the serially connected parallel manipulators have 6-DOF. This is complementary to a manipulator embodiment disclosed here that is composed of two serial manipulators connected in parallel.


Stuart disclosed various configurations of a manipulator to effect movement of a support member (platform) in three-dimensional space. The manipulator configurations include first and second 3-DOF actuator systems, each of which connects to the support member at a respective attachment point through 3-DOF revolute joints. By contrast, one of the 3-DOF actuator systems of manipulator embodiments disclosed here connects to the support member through a 2-DOF revolute joint.


SUMMARY

The needs set forth herein as well as further and other needs and advantages are addressed by the present embodiments, which illustrate solutions and advantages described below.


The system of the present embodiment includes, but is not limited to the following embodiments.


An embodiment of the manipulator system has a positioner having a primary rail, a first coupling linkage, and a second coupling linkage. The first coupling linkage coupling said primary rail to a base and positioning primary rail and said second coupling linkage along a first plane. The manipulator system has another positioner having a secondary rail, a third coupling linkage, and a fourth coupling linkage. The third coupling linkage coupling said secondary rail to the base and positioning said secondary rail and said fourth coupling linkage along a second plane parallel to the first plane. Further, the manipulator system has a common link coupling to said primary and secondary rails via said second and fourth coupling linkages, the common link defining a longitudinal axis that intersects the first plane and the second plane. Each of said second and fourth coupling linkages includes a joint for linear motion along the respective rail and rotational motion around the respective rail, and a revolute joint for relative pivoting between the respective rail and said common link. A position and orientation of said common link relative to the base is adjustable by said joints and said revolute joints.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has second and fourth coupling linkages. Each of said second and fourth coupling linkages includes a joint for linear motion along the common link. The position and orientation of said common link relative to the base is adjustable by said joints for linear motion along the common link.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a support fixed to the base and connected to said first and third coupling linkages.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a first coupling linkage where said first coupling linkage is adjustable to move said primary rail relative to the base.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a first coupling linkage where said first coupling linkage includes a joint that provides linear motion of said primary rail along said support.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint on said first coupling where said joint of said first coupling linkage provides rotational motion of said primary rail around an axis of said support.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a third coupling linkage where said third coupling linkage is adjustable to move said secondary rail relative to the base.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a third coupling linkage where said third coupling linkage includes a joint that provides linear motion of said secondary rail along said support.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint of said third coupling linkage where said joint of said third coupling linkage provides rotational motion of said secondary rail around an axis of said support.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a second support fixed to the base.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a second support where said second support is parallel to said support.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a positioner where said positioner has at least two primary rails, a first primary rail that is connected to the base via said first coupling linkage, and a second primary rail that is connected to said common link via said second coupling linkage. A joint couples the first and second primary rails together such that said second primary rail is movable along said first primary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a positioner where said positioner includes at least two secondary rails, a first secondary rail that is connected to the base via said third coupling linkage, and a second secondary rail that is connected to said common link via said fourth coupling linkage. A joint couples the first and second secondary rails together such that said second secondary rail is movable along said first secondary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint coupling the first and second primary rails where said joint coupling the first and second primary rails together is a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second primary rail along said first primary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint coupling the first and second secondary rails, where said joint coupling the first and second secondary rails includes a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second secondary rail along said first secondary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint coupling the first and second primary rails together where said joint coupling the first and second primary rails together includes a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second primary rail along said first primary rail. The joint coupling the first and second primary rails also has a revolute joint that provides rotational motion of said second primary rail around an axis of said revolute joint.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint where said joint further includes a second prismatic joint that said second primary rail is free to slide through. The position of said second prismatic joint is adjustable along said second primary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint coupling the first and second secondary rails where said joint coupling the first and second secondary rails together includes a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second secondary rail along said first secondary rail. The joint coupling the first and second secondary rails also has a revolute joint that provides rotational motion of said second secondary rail around an axis of said revolute joint.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint where said joint further includes a second prismatic joint that said second secondary rail is free to slide through. The position of said second prismatic joint is adjustable along said second secondary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a positioner that further includes a third primary rail that is connected to the base via a second support. A joint couples the third and second primary rails together such that said second primary rail is movable along said third primary rail and said first primary rail is parallel to said third primary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a joint that couples the third primary rail and the second primary rail together where the joint that couples the third primary rail and the second primary rail together includes a revolute joint for pivoting motion between the third primary rail and the second primary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has another positioner where said another positioner further includes a third secondary rail that is connected to the base via a second support. Another joint couples the second and third secondary rails together such that said second secondary rail is movable along said third secondary rail and said first secondary rail is parallel to said third primary rail.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a first primary rail and a second primary rail where said first primary rail and said first secondary rail are parallel, and said second primary rail and said second secondary rail are parallel.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a primary rail and a secondary rail where the primary rail and secondary rail are parallel.


Another embodiment of the manipulator system has a tool mounted to said common link.


An embodiment of a manipulator system has a positioner that includes a first primary rail, a second primary rail, a first coupling linkage, a second coupling linkage, and a third coupling linkage. The first coupling linkage couples said first primary rail to a base. The third coupling linkage connects the second primary rail to the first primary rail and positions said second primary rail and said second coupling linkage along a first plane. The embodiment of the manipulator system has another positioner that includes a first secondary rail, a second secondary rail, a fourth coupling linkage, a fifth coupling linkage, and a sixth coupling linkage. The fourth coupling linkage couples said first secondary rail to the base. The sixth coupling linkage couples the first secondary rail to the second secondary rail and positions said second secondary rail and said fourth coupling linkage along a second plane parallel to the first plane.


The embodiment further includes a common link coupled to said second primary rail and said second secondary rail via said second and fifth coupling linkages. The common link defines a longitudinal axis that intersects the first plane and the second plane. The third coupling linkage includes a prismatic joint for linear motion of the second primary rail along the first primary rail, and the sixth coupling linkage includes a prismatic joint for linear motion of the second secondary rail along the first secondary rail. The first coupling linkage has a prismatic joint for linear motion of the first primary rail along a support, and the fourth coupling linkage has a prismatic joint for linear motion of the first secondary rail along the support.


Each of said second and fifth coupling linkages includes a joint for linear motion along the respective rail and rotational motion around the respective rail, and a revolute joint for relative pivoting between the respective rail and said common link. The second primary rail and the second secondary rail are parallel. The revolute joint of the second coupling link has a revolute axis about which it rotates and the revolute joint of the fifth coupling linkage has a revolute axis about which it rotates. The revolute axis of the second coupling link is parallel to the revolute axis of the fifth coupling linkage. A position and orientation of said common link relative to the base is adjustable by said joints and said revolute joints.


An embodiment of parallel connected manipulator system has a primary manipulator system and a secondary manipulator system. The primary manipulator system is connected in parallel with said secondary manipulator system via a support. A coupling linkage of said primary manipulator system is connected to the support between two coupling linkages of said secondary manipulator system. One of the two coupling linkages of said secondary manipulator system connects to the support between the coupling linkage of said primary manipulator and another coupling linkage of said primary manipulator system. A common link of said primary manipulator system couples to a common link of said secondary manipulator system forming a connected common link, wherein a twist angle is allowable between said common link of said primary manipulator system and said common link of said secondary manipulator system. The support connects said primary manipulator system and said secondary manipulator system to a base wherein said base is movable along said support.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. Prior art, serial cylindrical positioner in series with a 2-axes actuated spherical wrist for overall 5-DOF control of a tool-link.



FIG. 2. Hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled cylindrical manipulator.



FIG. 3. Parallel connected, multi degrees-of-freedom, coupled cylindrical manipulator composed of the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled cylindrical manipulators of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4. Prior art, serial modified SCARA positioner in series with a 2-axes actuated spherical wrist for overall 5-DOF control of tool-link.



FIG. 5. Hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled modified SCARA manipulator.



FIGS. 6A-6D. Prior art, serial Cartesian positioner in series with a 3-axes actuated spherical wrist.



FIGS. 7A-7D. Hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with non-parallel joint axes.



FIGS. 8A-8D. Hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes, rotated 0° around axis {circumflex over (Z)}W.



FIGS. 9A-9D. Hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes, rotated −90° around axis {circumflex over (Z)}W.



FIGS. 10A-10D. Parallel connected 4-DOF or 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator composed of the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulators of FIGS. 8C, 9C or FIGS. 8D, 9D.



FIG. 11A-11B. Parallel connected 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with movable base composed of the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulators of FIGS. 8D, 9D.



FIG. 12. Two-dimensional schematic of the coordinate frames, links and joints of the manipulator.



FIG. 13. Two-dimensional schematic of three prismatic joints enabling planar linear and angular motion.



FIG. 14. Hybrid serial-parallel 6-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes.



FIG. 15. Hybrid serial-parallel 6-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with platform (tool-link) connected to one coupling link through a revolute joint and rigidly connected to the other coupling link.



FIG. 16. Hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with non-coaxial prismatic and revolute joints.



FIG. 17. Hybrid serial-parallel 6-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with tool-link connected to one coupling link through a revolute joint and rigidly connected to the other coupling link.



FIG. 18. Hybrid serial-parallel, multi degrees-of-freedom, coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes.



FIG. 19. Hybrid serial-parallel, multi degrees-of-freedom, coupled Cartesian manipulator that rotated −90° relative to the manipulator in FIG. 18.



FIG. 20. Parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator composed of the hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulators of FIGS. 18, 19.



FIG. 21. One of four similar components of a parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator with intersecting revolute joint axes.



FIG. 22. The component from FIG. 21, together with additional structural support components.



FIG. 23. One of four similar components of a parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator that is complimentary to the one in FIG. 21.



FIG. 24. Hybrid serial-parallel, multi degrees-of-freedom, coupled Cartesian manipulator that is composed of the components of FIGS. 22, 23, coupled together with a connector.



FIG. 25. ‘Parallel joint axes, with fixed-distance’, hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator with intersecting revolute joint axes rotated −90° relative to the manipulator in FIG. 24.



FIG. 26. Parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator composed of two ‘parallel joint axes, with fixed-distance’, hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulators of FIGS. 24, 25, joined together, with a revolute joint, along the common tool-link axis, and with intersecting revolute joint axes.



FIG. 27. Parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator that is similar to the manipulator in FIG. 26, with additional structural support components.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Mathematical Description


Introduction. Equations, based on the coordinate frames of FIG. 12 and the nomenclature in Table 1, mathematically describe the coupled-positioners manipulator embodiments of FIGS. 2, 5, 7A-7D, 8A-8D, 9A-9D. The notation in FIG. 12 pertains to generic links LA, LB, LC, LD but it applies equally to the specific links LA1, LB1, LC1, LD1 in FIG. 8A, 8B or links LA2, LB2, LC2, LB2 in FIG. 9A, 9B. The two manipulator embodiments from FIGS. 8C and 9C, or 8D and 9D, joined together by coaxial revolute joints along the tool-link (platform or common link), form the manipulator embodiments in FIGS. 10C, 11D. Therefore, the general mathematical descriptions derived for the manipulator embodiments in FIGS. 7A-7D, 8A-8D, 9A-9D also apply to the manipulator embodiments in FIGS. 10A-10D, 11A-11B. The mathematical equations provide bases for the design, simulation, control and analysis of the manipulator embodiments. They provide analytical expressions for the inverse kinematics and for the relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB, LD.









TABLE 1







Nomenclature.








Symbol
Description





LT
Link T


FW
Coordinate frame W


TW = [xTW yTW zTW]′
Vector position of point T relative to frame FW


xTW, yTW, zTW
Scalar coordinates of point T written in frame FW


{circumflex over (X)}TW, ŶTW, {circumflex over (Z)}TW
Unit vectors of frame FT relative to FW


{circumflex over (X)}TW = [x{circumflex over (X)}TW y{circumflex over (X)}TW z{circumflex over (X)}TW]′
X axis unit vector of frame FT relative to frame FW


x{circumflex over (X)}TW, y{circumflex over (X)}TW, z{circumflex over (X)}TW
three scalar coordinates of unit vector {circumflex over (X)}TW relative to



frame FW


RTW = [{circumflex over (X)}TW ŶTW {circumflex over (Z)}TW]
Rotation transformation matrix [3 × 3] of frame FT relative



to FW


RTW TZ, θTX, θTY)
Rotation matrix in terms of three sequential rotations


θTZ
Scalar angular rotation around {circumflex over (Z)}T axis of frame FT


θTZ, θTX, θTY
Three sequential rotations around the {circumflex over (Z)}T, {circumflex over (X)}T, ŶT axes of



frame FT


{circumflex over (Z)}TW TZ, θTX, θTY)
Z axis unit vector in terms of three sequential rotation



angles


[I]
Identity matrix [3 × 3]



Parallel, i.e. equidistant lines



custom character

Non-parallel, i.e. non-equidistant lines


P, R, U, S
Passive joints: prismatic, revolute, universal, spherical



P, R, U, S

Active joints: prismatic, revolute, universal, spherical









Workspace. The orientations and positions of the components of the manipulator are expressed relative to a fixed workspace frame FW.


Object. The manipulator interacts with an object in the workspace. Frame FO is fixed in the object. The object may be fixed in the workspace or it may be movable relative to the workspace by hand or by actuators.


Coordinate frames. The positions and orientations of the components of the manipulator are expressed relative to Cartesian coordinate frames as shown in FIG. 12. For example, each link LA has frame FA that is fixed in the link. The origin AW of frame FA is coincident with the axis of the first revolute joint of link LA. Link LB with frame FB connects to the second revolute joint of link LA. Links LA and LB share this common revolute joint. The origin of the frame FB is at position BA relative to frame FA and is coincident with the axis of the common revolute joint.


Workspace orientation. The positive direction of unit vector{circumflex over (Z)}W of frame FW points vertically up In FIG. 12 according to typical mathematical conventions. However, the object to be worked on is beneath the manipulator for many practical applications like laser cutting, drilling or milling for example. In these cases, it is more practical for the positive direction of unit vector {circumflex over (Z)}W to point vertically down.


Link assembly. The manipulator has five links LA, LB, LC, LD, LT with embedded frames FA, FB, FC, FD, FT respectively. Links LA, LB, LC, LD are grouped into two pairs {LA, LB} and {LC, LD}. Links LA, LC are the ‘first’ links of each pair and links LB, LD are the ‘second’ links respectively.


Tool-link (platform or common link). The tool-link LT (platform or common link) is the interface of the manipulator to the tool that interacts with objects in the workspace. The tool-link LT connects links LB, LD along a revolute or revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint parallel to axes {circumflex over (Z)}BW, {circumflex over (Z)}DW, {circumflex over (Z)}TW so that the {circumflex over (Z)} axes of frames FB, FD, FT are constrained to be parallel, i.e. {circumflex over (Z)}BW∥{circumflex over (Z)}DW∥{circumflex over (Z)}TW. The tool-link LT rigidly connects to either link LB or link LD. If the tool-link LT connects to link LB then the two links form a single rigid body, so that they have the same orientation. Similarly, links LD and LT form a rigid body and have the same orientation if the tool-link LT rigidly connects to link LD. For a preferred embodiment, described below, links LB, LD both rigidly connect to tool-link LT forming a single rigid body.


First links. The first link LA, LC of each pair {LA, LB}, {LC, LD} rotates around joint axis {circumflex over (X)}A, {circumflex over (X)}C located at position AWw, CW fixed in link LA, LC respectively. Two separate positioners independently translate linear positions AW, CW of links LA, LC in three-dimensions. Additionally, joint axes {circumflex over (X)}A, {circumflex over (X)}C of links LA, LC may rotate around the {circumflex over (Z)}W axis. Links {LA, LB} form a link-pair with two rotational degrees-of-freedom and links {LC, LD} form a separate link-pair with two rotational degrees-of-freedom.


Second links. The second link LB, LD of each pair {LA, LB}, {LC, LD} connects to the tool-link LT through a revolute-prismatic (cylindrical), revolute, prismatic or no joint, along axis {circumflex over (Z)}T, that is located at fixed position TB, TD relative to frame FB, FD respectively. Depending on the embodiment, the prismatic joint may be necessary to accommodate changes in the distance between links LB, LD as the tool-link orientation changes. The second link LB of pair {LA, LB} connects to first link LA through a revolute joint located at fixed position BA relative to frame FA with angular rotation axis ŶB perpendicular to axis {circumflex over (Z)}T. Similarly, the second link LD of pair {LC, LD} connects through a revolute joint located at fixed position DC relative to frame FC with angular rotation axis ŶD perpendicular to axis {circumflex over (Z)}T.


Tool-link orientation unit vector {circumflex over (Z)}TW coordinates. The orientation of the {circumflex over (Z)}T axis of the tool-link frame LT is denoted by the unit vector {circumflex over (Z)}TW=[x{circumflex over (Z)}TWy{circumflex over (Z)}TWz{circumflex over (Z)}TW]′ where x{circumflex over (Z)}TW, y{circumflex over (Z)}TW, z{circumflex over (Z)}TW are the three coordinates of {circumflex over (Z)}TW relative to workspace frame FW. Since the {circumflex over (Z)} axes of links LB, LD, LT are parallel, their coordinates relative to frame FW are identical. Therefore {circumflex over (Z)}BW={circumflex over (Z)}DW={circumflex over (Z)}TW.


Tool-link rotation matrix RTW is composed of the three unit vectors of frame FT written relative to workspace frame FW: RTW=[{circumflex over (X)}TW ŶTW {circumflex over (Z)}TW]. The nine elements of the rotation matrix










R
T
W

=

[




x


X
^

T

W




x


Y
^

T

W




x


Z
^

T

W






y


X
^

T

W




y


Y
^

T

W




y


Z
^

T

W






z


X
^

T

W




z


Y
^

T

W




z


Z
^

T

W




]





(
2
)








are the ‘direction cosines’ between the unit vectors of the two frames.


Tool-link rotation matrix for multiple axes rotation angle sequences. Rotation matrices for Tait-Bryan or Euler rotation angle sequences are available in the references disclosed herein. For example, the rotation matrix RTWTZ, θTX, θTY) for the Z-X-Y intrinsic Tait-Bryan rotation sequence {θTZ→θTXθTY} is,











R
T
W



(


θ

T
Z


,

θ

T
X


,





θ

T
Y



)


=



[






c


(

θ

T
Z


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)



-


s


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
X


)








s


(

θ

T
Y


)








-

s


(

θ

T
Z


)









c


(

θ

T
X


)








s


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
X


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)



+


c


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
Y


)











s


(

θ

T
Z


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)



+


c


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
X


)








s


(

θ

T
Y


)








c


(

θ

T
Z


)








c


(

θ

T
X


)








-

c


(

θ

T
Z


)









s


(

θ

T
X


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)



+


s


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
Y


)










-

c


(

θ

T
X


)









s


(

θ

T
Y


)






s


(

θ

T
X


)






c


(

θ

T
X


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)






]






(
3
)








where compact notation s(·), c(·) is used to represent sin(·), cos(·), respectively.


Tool-link unit vector angular representation {circumflex over (Z)}TWTZ, θTX, θTY). Equating the third columns of Eqs. (2, 3) expresses the tool-link orientation unit vector in terms of three sequential rotation angles,












Z
^

T
W



(


θ

T
Z


,





θ

T
X


,





θ

T
Y



)


=


[




x


Z
^

T

W






y


Z
^

T

W






z


Z
^

T

W




]

=



[






s


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
X


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)



+


c


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
Y


)











-

c


(

θ

T
Z


)









s


(

θ

T
X


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)



+


s


(

θ

T
Z


)








s


(

θ

T
Y


)










c


(

θ

T
X


)








c


(

θ

T
Y


)






]







(
4
)







Tool-link orientation unit vector {circumflex over (Z)}TW angles. The tool-link LT rigidly connects to either link LB or link LD. The tool-link LT orientation vector {circumflex over (Z)}TW matches the orientation of the link to which it connects. Therefore, tool-link LT orientation matches link LB orientation {circumflex over (Z)}TWTW, θTX, θTY)={circumflex over (Z)}BWAZ, θAX, θBY) if the tool-link connects to link LB so that they have the same orientation angles θTZAZ′ θTXAX, θTY. Substituting {θAZ, θAX, θBX}={θTZ, θX, θTY} into Eq. (4) expresses the unit vector {circumflex over (Z)}TW in terms of the three sequential rotation angles θAZ, θAX, θBY












Z
^

T
W



(


θ

A
Z


,





θ

A
X


,





θ

B
Y



)


=


[




x


Z
^

T

W






y


Z
^

T

W






z


Z
^

T

W




]

=



[






s


(

θ

A
Z


)








s


(

θ

A
X


)








c


(

θ

B
Y


)



+


c


(

θ

A
Z


)








s


(

θ

B
Y


)











-

c


(

θ

A
Z


)









s


(

θ

A
X


)








c


(

θ

B
Y


)



+


s


(

θ

A
Z


)








s


(

θ

B
Y


)










c


(

θ

A
X


)








c


(

θ

B
Y


)






]







(
5
)







If the tool-link LT connects to link LB then the orientation angles θAX, θBY of links LA, LB in terms of the coordinates {circumflex over (Z)}TW=[x{circumflex over (Z)}TW y{circumflex over (Z)}TW z{circumflex over (Z)}TW]′ of the tool-link axis depend on orientation angle θAZ of link LA and are derived from Eq. (5),

θAX=a tan 2(sin(θAZ)x{circumflex over (Z)}TW−cos(θAZ)y{circumflex over (Z)}TW,z{circumflex over (Z)}TW),0≤θAX≤2π   (6)
θBY=sin−1(cos(θAZ)x{circumflex over (Z)}W+sin(θAZ)y{circumflex over (Z)}TW),−π/2≤θBY≤π/2  (7)

where, θ=a tan 2(y,x) is the four quadrant arctan(y/x) function with range 0≤θ≤2π and the range of θ=sin−1(·) is −π/2≤θ≤θ≤π/2.


Similarly, if tool-link LT connects to link LD then the orientation angles θCX, θDY of links LC, LD depend on orientation angle θCZ of link LC,

θCX=a tan 2(sin(θCZ)x{circumflex over (Z)}TW−cos(θCZ)y{circumflex over (Z)}TW,z{circumflex over (Z)}TW),0≤θCX≤2π   (8)
θDY=sin−1(cos(θCZ)x{circumflex over (Z)}TW+sin(θCZ)y{circumflex over (Z)}TW),−π/2≤θDY≤π/2  (9)


Relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB, LD. In general, links LB, LD, LT rotate relative to each other by relative twist angle θBDZ around their common {circumflex over (Z)}BW, {circumflex over (Z)}DW, {circumflex over (Z)}TW axis. The rotation matrix RBD expresses the orientation of link LB relative to link LD. Rotation matrix RBD may be expressed in terms of the rotation matrices RDW, RBW as follows. From RBD=RWDRBW and the inverse property of orthogonal rotation matrices RWD=[RDW]−1=[RDW]′ yields,

RBD=[RDW]′RBW  (10)

where RBWAZ, θAX, θBY) and RDWCZ, θCX, θDY) may be expressed in terms of Z-X-Y intrinsic Tait-Bryan rotation angles from Eq. (3) with appropriate variable substitutions {θAZ, θAX, θBY}={θTZ, θTX, θTY} and {θCZ, θCX, θDY}={θTZ, θTX, θTY} respectively. The nine components of rotation matrix RBD may be computed numerically from Eq. (10).


The orientation of link LB relative to link LD may also be expressed in terms of the relative twist angle θBDZ around the common {circumflex over (Z)}BW, {circumflex over (Z)}DW axis with corresponding rotation matrix












R

B
Z


D
Z




(

θ

BD
Z


)






[
21
]

,





















R

B
Z


D
Z




(

θ

BD
Z


)


=

[




cos


(

θ

BD
Z


)





-

sin


(

θ

BD
Z


)





0





sin


(

θ

BD
Z


)





cos


(

θ

BD
Z


)




0




0


0


1



]





(
11
)








equating Eqs. (10, 11),











R

B
Z


D
Z




(

θ

BD
Z


)


=


R
B
D

=



[

R
D
W

]





R
B
W







(
12
)








and dividing the [1,2] and [2,2] components of rotation matrices







R

B
Z


D
Z


,





and RBD yields the relative twist angle,

θBDZ=a tan 2(RBD[1,2],RBD[2,2])  (13)

where RBD[1,2], RBD[2,2] are the [1,2] and [2,2] components of rotation matrix RBD.


Accommodating relative twist angle θBDz. In general, the three links LB, LD, LT must be connected by a revolute joint because of the relative twist angle θBDZ between the links, around their common {circumflex over (Z)}T axis. However, if the relative angle θAZCZ between links LB, LD is fixed, then the absolute value of the relative twist angle θBDZ typically varies by less than a few degrees, depending on the orientation of the tool-link. Therefore, the revolute joint connecting links LB, LD, LT may be implemented with mechanical components with only limited range of angular motion if the relative angle θAZ θCZ between links LB, LD is fixed. For example, the mechanical components along the tool-link of the interleaved coupled Cartesian manipulator InSm, with intersecting revolute joint axes, in FIG. 11B do not run into each other because θBDZ<±16° over the full θp≤±45° polar angular range of orientation of the tool-link.


No relative twist angle θBDZ=0. There is no relative twist angle θBDZ=0 between links LB, LD if the rotation angles θAZCZ of links LA, LC are equal. Setting θAZCZ in Eqs. (6, 8) shows that θAXCX. Similarly, setting θAZCZ in Eqs. (7, 9) shows that θBYDY. Since all three pairs of corresponding rotation angles are equal {θAZ, θAX, θBY}={θCZ, θCX, θDY} the corresponding rotation matrices RBWAZ, θAX, θBY)=RDWCZ, θCX, θDY) are also equal so that RBD=[RDW]′ RBW=[I] in Eq. (10). Substituting in the [1,2] and [2,2] components of RBD=[I] into Eq. (13) shows that the relative twist angle θBDZ=−a tan 2(0,1)=0, if θAZCZ.


Singularities. Theoretically, the coupled Cartesian manipulator has singularities at tool-link orientation angles θTX=±90°, +θTY=±90° however the mechanical hardware of the manipulator prevents those angles from being reached in practice.


Inverse kinematics for manipulator embodiments with intersecting joint axes. The inverse kinematics for manipulator embodiments with intersecting joint axes are very simple since the origins AW, CW of their links LA, LC lie on the {circumflex over (Z)}TW axis of the tool-link LT. Given desired position TW and orientation {circumflex over (Z)}TW of the tool-link LT, the inverse kinematic positions of links LA, LC are,

AW=zAT{circumflex over (Z)}TW+TW  (14)
CW=zCT{circumflex over (Z)}TW+TW  (15)

where zAT, zCT are the position coordinates, along the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}TW axis, of links LA, LC relative to the origin TW of the tool-link frame FT.


Description of Embodiments

Hybrid serial-parallel coupled-positioners manipulator with parallel joint axes. The ‘parallel-revolute-axes’ configuration where revolute axes {circumflex over (X)}AW, {circumflex over (X)}CW are parallel so that {circumflex over (X)}AW∥{circumflex over (X)}CW and angles θAZCZ, is a preferred embodiment of the manipulator. There is no relative twist angle θBDZ=0 between links LB, LD around their common {circumflex over (Z)}B={circumflex over (Z)}D axis for the parallel-revolute-axes embodiment. This means that links LB, LD can connect to the tool-link without using a revolute joint between them. This simplifies the mechanical assembly of the manipulator and makes it inherently stiffer. It can also reduce the number of actuators required. If links LB, LD couple, without a revolute joint, then angle θA1Z is forced to be the same as angle θC1Z, i.e. θA1ZC1Z. This means that only one set of independent actuators is needed to actively control either θA1Z or θC1Z since the other angle is driven passively through the rigid angular connection between links LB, LD.


Hybrid serial-parallel coupled-positioners manipulator with parallel joint axes and fixed distance between links LB, LD. In addition to the parallel-revolute-axes constraint where θAZCZ, a further preferred embodiment is implemented by constraining a fixed Euclidean distance ∥D−B∥2 between links LB, LD. Therefore, for the parallel-revolute-axes embodiment, links LB, LD, LT can be rigidly connected to each other for a further preferred embodiment of the manipulator. The three links form a single rigid body so that the distance δzTB-D=|zTB−zTD| along the tool-link axis {circumflex over (Z)}T between links LB, LD is fixed. In this case, the zAW or zCW coordinates of positions A or C of link LA or LC must be free to slide along the {circumflex over (Z)}W axis of the workspace to accommodate changes in distance as the tool-link orientation changes.


Over-constrained. The two preferred embodiments, of the two previous paragraphs, over-constrain the manipulator. This feature can be used to take out mechanical play from the linear and rotary bearings and to increase overall stiffness of the manipulator. However, this comes at the expense of potentially increased internal load and wear on the bearings resulting in shorter life. Precise relative alignment of the components is required for over-constrained manipulator embodiments.


Detailed Description of the Drawings


Items with identical label numbers, in all of the figures, identify identical items with identical functions. The figures illustrate topologies of coupled non-Cartesian FIGS. 1-5 and coupled Cartesian FIGS. 6-27 manipulator embodiments. However non-Cartesian and Cartesian positioners may also be coupled together. Similarly, different types of non-Cartesian positioners, like cylindrical positioner and modified SCARA positioner, may also be coupled together.



FIG. 1 depicts a serial cylindrical positioner (PRP) in series with a 2-axes actuated spherical wrist (RR) for overall 5-DOF control of the platform (common link or tool-link). Two links LA1, LB1 couple cylindrical positioner (PRP) to tool-link (platform or common link) LT. The cylindrical positioner translates the position of the tool-link and two actuated revolute joints (RR) driving links LA, LB to manipulate the orientation of the tool-link LT with 5-DOF control and overall joint notation (PRPRR). The manipulator in FIG. 1 controls the position and orientation of tool-link LT relative to a fixed base. Four diagonal hash marks identify the fixed base here and in the subsequent drawings. Heavy arrows depict actuated prismatic P and revolute R joints here and in the subsequent drawings. The dashed arrow depicts an alternate embodiment (RPRRP) of the manipulator, where the first prismatic joint of couple cylindrical position is fixed and the prismatic joint attached to the tool-link, depicted by the dashed straight arrow, is active.



FIG. 2 depicts a hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF (degree-of-freedom) coupled cylindrical manipulator. Coupling the cylindrical positioner from FIG. 1 to a second cylindrical positioner yields the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled cylindrical manipulator (PRPRR) (PRPRR) of FIG. 2. Links LA1, LB1 couple the first cylindrical positioner to the tool-link (platform or common link) LT and links LC1, LD1 couple the second cylindrical positioner to the same tool-link LT. The actuated revolute joints driving the joints of links LA1, LB1 in FIG. 1 are now replaced with passive revolute joints depicted by dashed elliptical arrows in FIG. 2. Similarly, links' LC1, LD1 revolute joints are passive. Tool-link orientation is manipulated by differential motion of the two cylindrical positioners.



FIG. 3 depicts a parallel connected coupled cylindrical manipulator with multiple degrees-of-freedom. Coupling, to a common tool-link LT, the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled cylindrical positioner from FIG. 2, with links LA1, LB1, LC1, LD1, to a second hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled cylindrical positioner, with links, LA2, LC2, LD2, yields the parallel connected 5-DOF coupled cylindrical manipulator (PRPRR)-(3-(PRPRR)) of FIG. 3 with 5 actuated prismatic joints depicted by heavy straight arrows. Fixing the active prismatic P joint attached to the fixed base produces a parallel connected 4-DOF coupled cylindrical manipulator embodiment with joint notation 4-(PRPRR).



FIG. 4 depicts a serial modified 5-DOF SCARA positioner with joint notation (RRRRP). The dotted straight arrow depicts and alternate embodiment with joint notation (PRRRR) where the first prismatic joint, attached to the fixed base is active and the last prismatic joint, attached to the tool-link is fixed.



FIG. 5 depicts a hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled modified SCARA manipulator. Five active joints, depicted by heavy arrows, manipulate the position and orientation of the tool-link LT of the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled modified SCARA positioner with joint notation (RRRRP)-(RRRRP).



FIGS. 6-11 illustrate the topology of coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments. Since it is difficult to visualize their 3D topologies using only 2D drawings the manipulator embodiments are broken down into several sub-assemblies, where the various components are easier to see. Each individual sub-assembly functions as a stand-alone manipulator, with its own unique features, that are described in the text and summarized in Table 2. The sub-assemblies progress in sequence from serial to hybrid serial-parallel to parallel connected coupled manipulator embodiments. The individual sub-assemblies combine hierarchically to form the parallel connected 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments depicted in FIGS. 11A, 11B, i.e. two prior art serial Cartesian positioners in FIGS. 6C, 6D form a single hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator. See FIGS. 8C, 8D, 9C, 9D. Two hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments form a single parallel connected 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator in FIGS. 11A, 11B.


Each one of the FIGS. 6-10 has four drawings. The first row of drawings NiSc, NiSm depicts manipulator embodiments with non-intersecting revolute joint axes and the second row depicts manipulator embodiments InSc, InSm with intersecting revolute joint axes. Linear actuators transmit axial forces directly to the tool-link through the intersecting revolute joint axes without imparting lateral or moment loads. Furthermore, linear actuators directly control, through the intersecting axes, the positions of points on the tool-link for precise control of the tool-link. The manipulator embodiments InSc, InSm with intersecting joint axes are more compact, however it is easier to visualize the individual movable links LA, LB, LC, LD of the manipulator embodiments NiSc, NiSm with non-intersecting joint axes. The first column of drawings in FIGS. 6-10, for example, FIGS. 6A and 6B, depict schematics NiSc, InSc, of the manipulator embodiments and the second column in FIGS. 6-10, for example, FIGS. 6C and 6D, depicts solid models NiSm, InSm.



FIG. 11A depicts a schematic InSc and FIG. 11B depicts solid model InSm of parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments with intersecting joint axes that position tool-link LT relative to moving base LBs with 5-DOF. The solid model InSm in FIG. 11B is based on commercially available hardware for motors, bearings, ball screw actuators and structural components.


Serial Cartesian manipulator. The prior art manipulator in FIGS. 6A-6D adjusts the position and orientation of tool-link LT relative to the fixed vertical base link LW. Only one of four possible vertical base links LW is shown, to make the movable links LA1, LB1, LT easier to see. Three serial prismatic joints, acting along the {circumflex over (X)}A1, ŶA1, {circumflex over (Z)}A1 axes, in series with three serial revolute joints, acting around the {circumflex over (X)}A1, ŶB1, {circumflex over (Z)}B1 axes, comprise the (PPPRRR) serial manipulator of FIGS. 6C, 6D. Parentheses enclose the joints of the serial kinematic linkage. Underlined joint notation P, R denotes active (actuated) prismatic and revolute joints respectively. The three active prismatic P joints translate the three-dimensional linear position of link LA1. Two active revolute R joints, rotating around the {circumflex over (X)}A1, ŶB1 axes, adjust the angular orientation of link LB1. A third active revolute R joint twists tool-link LT around its longitudinal {circumflex over (Z)}T axis. Tool-link LT axis ZT is coaxial with link LB axis {circumflex over (Z)}B. The three active prismatic P and three active revolute R joints are independently actuated for 6-DOF control of the tool-link LT. The five short arrows in schematic InSc, identify the active joints. Solid model drawings NiSm, InSm identify the coordinate frame of the manipulator embodiments' links. Rotation axes {circumflex over (X)}A1, ŶB1 of manipulator embodiments NiSc, NiSm do not intersect. Consequently links LA, LB are easier to see compared to the intersecting revolute joint axes manipulator embodiments InSc, InSm. However, link LB of the solid model InSm is transparent so that link LA is visible in the drawing. The topology of the manipulator in FIGS. 6C, 6D is comparable to some common 5-axes CNC milling machines with their spindles aligned with the {circumflex over (Z)}T axis.


Hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator with non-parallel joint axes. A common tool-link LT connects, in parallel, two serial manipulators from FIGS. 6C, 6D, forming the hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator(PPPRRR) (PPPRR) of FIG. 7C, 7D. Parentheses enclose individual serial kinematic linkages. The hyphen ‘-’ indicates that the two serial kinematic linkages connect in parallel. Non-underlined P and R represent passive prismatic and revolute joints respectively. Five linear actuators, acting along the {circumflex over (X)}A1, ŶA1, {circumflex over (Z)}A1, {circumflex over (X)}C1, ŶC1, axes manipulate tool-link LT with 5-DOF. Short arrows in schematic InSc, identify the five active joints. The first active prismatic P joint of the first serial manipulator (PPPRRR) controls the tool-link in the {circumflex over (Z)}W direction. The same first passive prismatic P joint of the second serial manipulator (PPPRR) accommodates changes in distance, between the links, as the tool-link orientation changes. The actuated revolute joints around the {circumflex over (X)}A1, ŶB1 axes from FIGS. 6C, 6D are now passive as are the revolute joints around the {circumflex over (X)}C1, ŶD1 axes. Now linear actuators solely manipulate the orientation of the {circumflex over (Z)}T axis of tool-link LT instead of the rotary actuators in FIGS. 6C, 6D. The two sets of revolute joint axes {circumflex over (X)}A1custom character{circumflex over (X)}A2 and ŶB1custom characterŶB2 are not parallel in FIGS. 7C, 7D. Consequently, as proven below, links LB1 and LB2 twist relative to each other around the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis, as the orientation of tool-link LT changes. Therefore, a passive revolute R joint, around the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis, is necessary to accommodate the relative twist angle θBDZ, shown in FIG. 7D. Again, links LB1, LB2, are transparent in the solid model InSm, so that links LA1, LA2 are visible respectively.


Hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes. The two sets of revolute joint axes {circumflex over (X)}A1∥{circumflex over (X)}C1 and ŶB1∥ŶD1 are parallel in FIGS. 8C, 8D for all tool-link LT orientations. Since revolute joint axes ŶB1∥ŶD1 are parallel, there is no relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB1 and LD1 so a passive revolute joint is not required between them and links LB1, LD1, LT connect, forming a single rigid body as shown in FIG. 8D drawing InSm. The hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes of FIGS. 8C, 8D has joint notation (PPPRR)-(PPPRR).


The manipulator in FIGS. 9A-9D is identical to the one in FIGS. 8A-8D except that it is rotated −90° around the {circumflex over (Z)}W axis. The link and coordinate symbols in FIGS. 9A-9D are labeled with subscript ‘2’ to distinguish them from the ones in FIGS. 8A-8D with subscript ‘1’.


Parallel connected 4-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator. Common tool-link LT connects the two hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments from FIGS. 8C, 9C, or FIGS. 8D, 9D. Together they form the parallel connected 4-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments of FIGS. 10C, 10D. Passive revolute R joints along the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis accommodate relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB1, LD1 and LB2, LD2 since the joint axes of the two manipulator embodiments from FIGS. 8C, 9C or FIGS. 8D, 9D are not parallel to each other. Two coaxial revolute R joints constrain the orientation of the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis. Faint dotted lines in FIG. 10B InSc depict a possible third coaxial revolute R joint. However, it is not required in practice and over constrains the other two coaxial revolute R joints. Four parallel connected actuators, controlling the linear positions xA1A1, xC1C1, xA2A2, xC2C2 of links LA1, LC1 LA2, LC2 adjust the linear {circumflex over (X)}W, ŶW position of the tool-link LT and angular orientation of its {circumflex over (Z)}T axis with 4-DOF. Short arrows identify active prismatic P joints in schematic InSc of FIG. 10B. Linear position zZ2W=0 is fixed for the 4-DOF manipulator in FIG. 10B, with joint notation (2-(PPPRRR)) (2-(PPPRR)). Notation ‘2-( )’ indicates that two serial kinematic linkages connect in parallel. The extra R in the first two serial kinematic linkages (PPPRRR) accounts for the revolute joints along {circumflex over (Z)}T to accommodate relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB1, LB2 and LD1, LD2.


The hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator from FIGS. 8A-8D interleaves with the one from FIGS. 9A-9D so that link LB2 from the second hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator is between links LB1, LD1 from the first hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator. Similarly, link LD1 from the first hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator is between links LB2, LD2 from the second hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator. This allows bearings for the passive revolute R joints to be spaced far apart from each other, along the tool-link LT, as seen in FIGS. 10A-10D. Bearing pairs that are spaced far apart from each other support high moment loads with high bending stiffness.


The load support link in FIG. 10D solid model InSm supports external loads applied to the tool-link LT and the weight of the links and joints along the tool-link. A passive (PPRP) serial kinematic linkage connects the load support link to the base link LW. The revolute R joint allows the load support link to swivel with the manipulator. For illustration, FIG. 10D shows the manipulator InSm with the load support link pointing up. However, typically it points down to support loads applied to the tool-link from tools like machining spindles for example.


Parallel Connected 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator. Additionally controlling the prismatic joint linear position zA2W along vertical link LW adds position control zTW along {circumflex over (Z)}W of the tool-link LT for 5-DOF in a hybrid serial-parallel configuration, with joint notation (PPPRRR)-(PPPRRR)-(2-(PPPRR)).


Parallel connected 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with movable base. The two parallel connected manipulator embodiments InSc, InSm in FIGS. 11A, 11B control the 5-DOF position and orientation of tool-link LT relative to movable base link LBs. An active prismatic joint is connected to the movable base link LBs that enable the base movable along the axe zBsW. One of the prismatic joints along LW is fixed and the other three prismatic joints along LW are passive to accommodate changes in distance, between the links, as the tool-link orientation changes. Joint notation for the parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator in FIGS. 11A, 11B is (PPRRR)-(PPPRRR)-(2-(PPPRR))-(P) for 5-DOF control, where (P) represents an active prismatic joint actuates the movable base. Notice that only one prismatic P joint is active per serial kinematic linkage indicating that both manipulator embodiments InSc and InSm in FIGS. 11A, 11B connect in parallel. The five active prismatic P joints, with linear positions xA1A1, xC1C1, xA2A2, xC2C2, zA2W are identified with short arrows in FIG. 11A schematic InSc. FIG. 11B drawing InSm is a solid model of the 5-DOF parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator based on commercially available hardware. The overall design of manipulator InSm in FIG. 11B is compact and symmetric providing space to attach tools in any one of the four quadrants around the tool-link.









TABLE 2







FIGS. 6-11, topologies and features of coupled Cartesian manipulator sub-assemblies.










Manipulator
FIGS.
Joint notation
Features





Serial Cartesian
6A, 6C
(PPPRRR)
6-DOF


manipulator
NiSc NiSm

Comparable to conventional 5-axis CNC





with rotating spindle


Serial Cartesian
6B, 6D
(PPPRRR)
Intersecting joint axes are more compact


manipulator with
InSc InSm

No lateral loads due to axial linear actuation


intersecting joint axes


forces





Precise control of tool-link directly through





intersecting joints





Simple inverse kinematics


Hybrid serial-parallel
7A-7D
(PPPRRR) −
Hybrid serial-parallel manipulator


5-DOF coupled
NiSc NiSm
(PPPRR)
Tool-link manipulated at two locations using


Cartesian manipulator
InSc InSm

two XYZ Cartesian manipulators


with non-parallel joint


axes


Hybrid serial-parallel
8A-8D, 9A-9D
(PPPRR) −
Hybrid serial-parallel manipulator


5-DOF coupled
NiSc NiSm
(PPPRR)
Eliminates need for one revolute joint


Cartesian manipulator
InSc InSm

Links LA, LB, LT may be a single rigid body


with parallel joint axes


Parallel connected 4-
10A-10D
(2 − (PPPRRR)) −
Two coupled Cartesian manipulator


DOF coupled
NiSc NiSm
(2 − (PPPRR))
embodiments from FIGS. 8A-8D, 9A-9D


Cartesian manipulator
InSc InSm

coupled together in parallel





Four identical linear actuators enable 4-





DOF tool-link position and orientation control





Interleaved coupled Cartesian manipulator





embodiments





Link LB2 is between links LB1, LD1





Link LD1 is between links LB2, LD2





Rotary bearings for revolute joint, along





tool-link axis, are spaced far apart from each





Provide high moment stiffness


Parallel connected 5-
10A-10D
(PPPRRR) −
Actuated prismatic joint position zA2W enables


DOF coupled
NiSc NiSm
(PPPRRR) −
5-DOF control of tool-link


Cartesian manipulator
InSc InSm
(2 − (PPPRR))


Parallel connected 5-
11A, 11B
(PPRRR) −
Parallel connected 5-DOF manipulator


DOF coupled
InSc InSm
(PPPRRR) −
5-DOF control of tool-link LT relative to


Cartesian manipulator

(2 − (PPPRR)) −
movable base LBs


with movable base

(P)










FIG. 12 is a two-dimensional schematic of the coordinate frames, links and joints of the manipulator. FIG. 12 identifies object frame FO 10; workspace frame FW 11; frame FA link LA 14; frame FB link LB 16; frame FB link LB 16; frame FC link LC 24; frame FD link LD 26; frame FT tool-link LT 12; and frame FV tool LV 50.



FIG. 13 is a two-dimensional schematic illustrating how three linear actuators implement linear and angular motion. The two linear position coordinates xAW, yAW and the angle θAZ of link LA is controlled with the three linear actuators 19, 21, 23 along linear rail-links 18, 20, 22 respectively, so that θAZ=a tan 2(yApW-yAmW, xApW-xAmW), xAW=xAmW+δ cos(θA1Z) and yAW=yAmW+δ sin(θAZ) where δ is the distance from rail-link 20 along rail-link 18 to link LA. The inverse kinematics equations are δ=(xAW-xAmW)cos(θAZ), yAmW=yAW-δ sin(θAZ), yApW=(xApW-xAmW)tan(θAZ), respectively.



FIG. 14 is a 3D (three dimension) view of a hybrid serial-parallel 6-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator with parallel joint axes 101 of the present teachings, which manipulates tool frame FT 09, connected to tool-link LT 12, to interact with object 10 in the workspace. For example, tool frame FT 09 may be orientated by Z-X-Z sequential intrinsic Euler angles θTZ, θTX, θTZ relative to the tool-link frame FT. Tool-link LT 12 is also known as a common link. Link LA 14 is oriented by angle θAZ 07 around axis {circumflex over (Z)}W. Link LA 14 connects to rail-link 18 with coaxial revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 15 that enables angular motion θAX, and linear motion coordinate xAW along rail-link 18. Linear actuator 19 enables motion of link LA 14 along rail-link 18. Heavy solid double-headed arrows in the figures depict linear actuators. Link LB 16 connects to link LA 14 with revolute joint 17 that enables angular motion θBY. Link LB 16 and link LA 14, combined together, constitute a coupling link. Similarly, link LC 24 and Link LD 26 constitute another coupling link. Coaxial revolute joint 13 connects links LB 16, LD 26, LT 12 to accommodate relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB 16 and LD 26. Rail-links 20 and 22 support rail-link 18 at each end respectively. Linear actuators 21 and 23 control the yAW coordinate of position AW and the orientation angle θAZ. Link LC 24 orientates by angle θCZ 08 around axis Z. Link LC 24 connects to rail-link 28 with coaxial revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 25 that enables angular motion θCX and linear motion coordinate xCW along rail-link 28. Linear actuator 29 enables motion of link LC 24 along rail-link 28. Link LD 26 connects to link 24 with revolute joint 27 that enables angular motion θDY. Rail-links 30 and 32 support rail-link 28 at each end respectively. Rail-links 20, 22, 30, 32 are supported at each end by rail-links 34, 34a, 34b, 34c which are supported on base 51. Rail-links 34, 34a, 34b, 34c are also known as supports fixed to base 51. Rail-links 20, 30, 18, 28, 22, 32 are also known as rails. Linear actuator 35, controls the position coordinate zAW of link LA 14 and the position coordinates zAW of rail-links 18, 20, 22 along rail-links 34, 34a, 34b, 34c. In the following description, the tool-link 12 rigidly connects to link LB 16 so that linear actuator 35 controls the position coordinate zTW of link LT 12. Alternatively, the tool-link 12 rigidly connects to link LD 26, so that linear actuator 49 controls the position coordinate zTW of link LT 12. Assuming that the tool-link 12 rigidly connects to link LB 16, if the positions of rail-links 28, 30, 32 along rail-links 34, 34a, 34b, 34c are fixed, then the position coordinate zCW of link LC 24 is also fixed In this case, joint 13 must be sliding to accommodate changes in the distance between link LA 14 and link LC 24 as the orientation angle of tool-link LT 12 changes. Optionally, prismatic joints may replace linear actuators 49, so that the positions of rail-links 28, 30, 32 are free to move along rail-links 34, 34a, 34b, 34c. In this case the distance between link LA 14 and link LC 24 can be fixed, so that joint 13 does not have to be sliding. The two rail-links 18, 28 are not constrained to be parallel, so that in general angles θAZ≠θCZ. In this case link LB 16 and link LD 26 connect by revolute joint 13 to accommodate relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB 16 and LD 26. If angles θAZ, θCZ are fixed then the manipulator of FIG. 14 has 5-DOF. Otherwise, the manipulator of FIG. 14 has 6-DOF if linear actuators 21, 23 move differentially to control angle θAZ and tool-link LT 12 rigidly connects to link LB 16; or if linear actuators 31, 33 move differentially to control angle θCZ, and tool-link LT 12 rigidly connects to link LD 26. Through control of angles θAZ and θCZ, and attachment to tool-link LT 12 between links LB 16 and LD 26, it can be altered sequentially to enable full 360° rotation of tool-link LT 12 around its longitudinal axis. Alternatively, linear actuator 33 may be controlled to maintain a fixed relative angle between links LA 14 and LC 24. For example, θAZCZ for a preferred embodiment of a manipulator with parallel joint axes {circumflex over (X)}B∥{circumflex over (X)}D, so that revolute joints 17, 27 are parallel and joints 15, 25 are parallel. In this case, links 12, 16, 26 can be connected without a revolute joint 13 since there is no relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB 16 and LD 26 for all positions of the parallel joint axes {circumflex over (X)}A∥{circumflex over (X)}C embodiment (θBDZ=0). Without a revolute joint 13, rail-links 18, 28 are constrained to be parallel, linear actuator 33 is redundant with linear actuator 23, so that linear actuator 33 may be replaced with a prismatic joint. Optionally, linear actuator 33 position may be electronically synchronized to that of linear actuator 23. Linear actuators 31, 33 can be actuated to keep rail-links 18, 28 parallel. Either way, six independently controlled linear actuators are sufficient to provide 6-DOF positioning and orientation control of the tool frame 09. Alternatively, angles θAZ, θCZ can be fixed for 5-DOF control of the tool frame 09. In this case, a preferred embodiment having both angles θAZ and θCZ are zero (θAZCZ=0°, so that link 18 is perpendicular to link 21 and link 28 is perpendicular to link 31; forming Cartesian positioners for the three-dimensional positions of link LA 14 and link LC 24 respectively.

    • 1. a positioning device that manipulates in 6-DOF, i.e. translatable in three spatial axes and rotatable around three spatial axes, the position and orientation of a platform (tool-link) 12 relative to object 10 in the workspace; where
    • 2. the position and orientation of the tool-link 12 is manipulated at two separate revolute joints 17, 27 connected to the tool-link 12 through links 16, 26, respectively; where
    • 3. either one of the links 16 or 26 rigidly connects to tool-link 12; where
    • 4. either one of the other links 26 or 16 connects to tool-link 12 through a revolute or revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 13; where
    • 5. each one of the two revolute joints 17, 27 is also connected to joints 15, 25 through links 14, 24 respectively; where
    • 6. the axes of rotation of the joints 15, 25 are generally perpendicular to the axes of rotation of the revolute joints 17, 27 respectively; where
    • 7. each one of the two joints 15, 25 connects to separate positioners; where
    • 8. each one of the two separate positioners manipulates one of the joints 15, 25 in 4-DOF, consisting of translation along three spatial axes and rotation around one axis, controlled by linear actuators 19, 21, 23, 35 and 31, 33, 29, 49 respectively; where
    • 9. the rotation axes of the two separate 4-DOF positioners are parallel; where
    • 10. the rotation axes of the two separate 4-DOF positioners are generally perpendicular to the plane of motion of linear actuators 19, 21, 23 and 29, 31, 33; where
    • 11. the translation of one of the two separate 4-DOF positioners along a direction parallel to the rotation axes of the two separate 4-DOF positioners, may be passive, i.e. unactuated, if joint 13 is a revolute joint, i.e. not a revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint; where
    • 12. the translation of one of the two separate 4-DOF positioners, along a direction parallel to the rotation axes of the two separate 4-DOF positioners, may be fixed, i.e. nonmoving, if joint 13 is a revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint.
    • 13. for a preferred embodiment, the axes of rotation of the revolute joints 17, 27 are parallel with each other eliminating revolute joint 13; where
    • 14. if joints 17, 27 are parallel, then the angular rotation of the two separate 4-DOF positioners are synchronized so that rotation angles 07 and 08 are identical; where
    • 15. if joints 17, 27 are parallel, then prismatic joint 13 may enable mechanical synchronization of the angular rotation of the two separate 4-DOF positioners.



FIG. 15. is a 3D view of a hybrid serial-parallel 6-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator 106. The tool-link LT 12 rigidly connects to link LB 16 with fastener 38 and is free to rotate in link LD 26 via revolute joint 13. Differentially positioning linear actuators 21, 23 controls angle θAZ 07 of link 18. Angle θCZ of link 28 is fixed (θCZ=0). Link 14 is free to slide and rotate on rail-link 18 through revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 15. Link 24 is free to slide and rotate on rail-link 28 through revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 25. For another preferred embodiment, joint 25 could be a spherical joint with three rotational degrees-of-freedom. Link 41 slides on rail-link 20. Link 42 connects to link 41 through revolute joint 43. Link 44 slides on rail-link 22. Link 45 connects to link 44 through revolute joint 46. Rail-link 18 is fixed in link 42 and free to slide in link 45. Link 61 slides on rail-link 30. Rail-link 28 is fixed in link 61. Links 48, 48a and links 48b, 48c slide on rail-links 34 and 34a respectively. Rail-links 20, 22 are fixed in links 48, 48b respectively. Rail-link 30 is fixed in links 48a 48c. Linear actuator 35 controls the position of link 48 along rail-link 34. Rail-link 30 optionally rigidly connects to rail-link 34 with fastener 58. In this case tool-link LT 12 must be free to slide linearly in a revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 13 in link LD 26 to accommodate changes in distance (δzTB-D=|zTB-zTD|) between links LB 16, LD 26 due to changes in tool-link LT 12 orientation. Alternatively, tool-link LT 12 is not free to slide linearly in revolute joint 13 in link LD 26. In this case, rail-link 30 must be free to slide linearly along rail-links 34, 34a or optionally be actively positioned by linear actuator 49. Rail-link 32 and rail-links 34b and 34c from FIG. 14 are omitted from FIG. 15, however they can be included for structural support or to over-constrain the bearings to remove mechanical play.

    • 1. a positioning device that manipulates in 6-DOF, i.e. translatable in three spatial axes and rotatable around three spatial axes, the position and orientation of a platform (tool-link) 12 relative to object 10 in the workspace; where
    • 2. the position and orientation of the tool-link 12 is manipulated at revolute joint 17 connected to the tool-link 12 through link 16; where
    • 3. the tool-link 12 connects to link 26 by combined revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 13; where
    • 4. the axes of the revolute portion and prismatic portion of the revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 13 are not necessarily coaxial; where
    • 5. the position and orientation of link 26 is manipulated at revolute joint 27; where
    • 6. each one of the two revolute joints 17, 27 is also connected to joints 15, 25 respectively through links 14, 24 respectively; where
    • 7. the axes of rotation of the joints 15, 25 are generally perpendicular to the axes of rotation of the revolute joints 17, 27 respectively; where
    • 8. each one of the two joints 15, 25 connects to two separate positioners; where
    • 9. one of the two separate positioners manipulates joint 15 in 4-DOF, consisting of translation along three spatial axes and rotation around one axis, controlled by linear actuators 19, 21, 23, 35; where
    • 10. the rotation axis of the 4-DOF positioners is generally perpendicular to the plane of motion of linear actuators 19, 21, 23; where
    • 11. the other separate positioner manipulates joint 25 in two linear degrees-of-freedom, consisting of translation along two spatial axes, controlled by linear actuators 29, 31.



FIG. 16 is a 3D view of a hybrid serial-parallel 5-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator 109. Revolute joint 15 and prismatic joint 18 are not coaxial and revolute joint 25 and prismatic joint 28 are not coaxial. The tool-link LT 12 and link LB 16 are one and the same rigid body. Linear actuator 35 controls the position coordinate zTW of link LT 12. The distance (δzTB-D=|zTB-zTD|) along the tool-link axis {circumflex over (Z)}T, between links LB 16, LD 26 is fixed. The distance (δzC-AW=|zCW-zAW|) along the workspace {circumflex over (Z)}W axis, between links LA 14, LC 24 is variable based on links 48 that slide on rail-links 34. Optionally, tool-link LT 12 can be connected to link LD 26 so that the position coordinate zTW of link LT 12 is controlled by linear actuator 49 and links 20, 22 are free to slide on rail-links 34, 34a, 34b, 34c. Angles θAZ and θC1Z are fixed (θAZ=π/2, θC1Z=0). Revolute joint 13 connects link LB 16 and link LD 26 to accommodate relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB 16 and LD 26. For another preferred embodiment, axes of links LA 14 and LC 24 are parallel. Angles θAZ and θC1Z are fixed (θAZ=0, θC1Z=0). Revolute joints 15, 25 axes are parallel and revolute joints 17, 27 axes are parallel. Revolute joint 15 and sliding joint 18 are not coaxial, and revolute joint 25 and sliding joint 28 are not coaxial. Revolute joints 17, 27 are connected through a common link 12.



FIG. 17 is a 3D view of a hybrid serial-parallel 6-DOF coupled Cartesian manipulator 112 of the present teachings, with tool-link LT 12 connected to one coupling link through a revolute joint and rigidly connected to the other coupling link. Angles θAZ, θCZ are variable in FIG. 17. The present teachings manipulate the position and orientation of a tool-link 12, with two sets of revolute joints, each with two rotational degrees-of-freedom and with parallel-joint-axes, {circumflex over (X)}A∥{circumflex over (X)}C. For another preferred embodiment, the rotary-axes of joints 15, 25 do not have to be parallel with the linear axes 18, 28.

    • 1. a positioning device that manipulates in 6-DOF, i.e. translatable in three spatial axes and rotatable around three spatial axes, the position and orientation of a platform (tool-link) 12 relative to object 10 in the workspace; where
    • 2. the orientation and position of the tool-link 12 is controlled at two separate revolute joints 17, 27 along the tool-link 12; where
    • 3. the revolute joints 17, 27 connect to links 16, 26 respectively; where
    • 4. either one of links 16 or 26 rigidly connects to tool-link 12 with fasteners 38, 68 respectively; where
    • 5. either one of the other links 26 or 16 connects to tool-link 12 either rigidly or through either revolute or revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 13; where
    • 6. each one of the revolute joints 17, 27 connects to the other revolute joints 15, 25 through separate links 14, 24 respectively; where
    • 7. the rotation axes of revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joints 15, 25 are generally perpendicular to the rotation axes of revolute joints 17, 27 respectively; where
    • 8. linear actuators 19, 29, translatable along rail-links 18, 28, control the linear positions of joints 15, 25; where
    • 9. differential motion of linear actuators 19, 29 controls an orientation angle of tool-link 12; where
    • 10. common motion of linear actuators 19, 29 controls a linear position of tool-link 12; where
    • 11. rail-link 18 rigidly connects to link 42 or 45; where
    • 12. rail-link 18 connects to the other link 45 or 42 through a prismatic joint; where
    • 13. links 42, 45 connect to links 41, 44 through revolute joints 43, 46 respectively; where
    • 14. rail-link 28 rigidly connects to link 62 or 65; where
    • 15. rail-link 28 connects to the other link 65 or 62 through a prismatic joint; where
    • 16. links 62, 65 connect to links 61, 64 through revolute joints 63, 66 respectively; where
    • 17. the rotation axes of revolute joints 43, 46, 63, 66 are parallel; where
    • 18. linear actuators 21, 23 control of the positions of links 41, 44, translatable along rail-links 20, 22, respectively; where
    • 19. linear actuators 31, 33 control of the positions of links 61, 64, translatable along rail-links 30, 32, respectively; where
    • 20. differential motion of linear actuators 31, 33 relative to linear actuators 21, 23 controls an orientation angle of tool-link 12; where
    • 21. common motion of linear actuators 21, 23, 31, 33 controls a linear position of tool-link 12; where
    • 22. differential motion of linear actuators 21, 23 controls the angle θA1Z 07 of rail-link 18; where
    • 23. angle θA1Z 07 controls the orientation of tool-link 12 around its longitudinal axis, if the tool-link 12 connects to link 16; where
    • 24. differential motion of linear actuators 31, 33 controls the angle θC1Z of rail-link 28; where
    • 25. angle θC1Z controls the orientation of tool-link 12 around its longitudinal axis if the tool-link 12 connects to link 26; where
    • 26. rail-links 20, 22, 30, 32 are supported on rail-links 34 that are parallel to each other and generally perpendicular to rail-links 34, 34a; where
    • 27. rail-links 34, 34a connect to base 51; where
    • 28. control of the position of rail-links 20, 22 is optionally provided by linear actuators 35, or 35a translatable along rail-links 34, 34a respectively; where
    • 29. control of the position of rail-links 30, 32 is optionally provided by linear actuators 49, or 49a translatable along rail-links 34, 34a.



FIG. 18 is a 3D view of a hybrid serial-parallel, multi degrees-of-freedom, coupled Cartesian manipulator 114 of the present teachings, with parallel joint 15, 25 axes and parallel joint 17, 27 axes. Linear actuators 19, 21, 29, 31, indicated by heavy double-headed arrows manipulate the tool-link LT 12 with 4-DOF. Linear actuator 21 moves link 41 on rail-link 20. Linear actuator 31 moves link 61 on rail-link 30. Linear actuator 19 moves link 14 on rail-link 18. Linear actuator 29 moves link 24 on rail-link 28. Angles θAZ and θCZ are fixed (θAZ=0, θCZ=0). Joints 15, 25 are combined coaxial revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joints. Joint 15 accommodates sliding and rotary motion of link LA 14 relative to rail-link 18, and joint 25 accommodates sliding and rotary motion of link LC 24 relative to rail-link 28. Since joint 17, 27 axes are parallel there is no relative twist angle θBDZ between links LB 16 and LD 26 around their common {circumflex over (Z)}BW, {circumflex over (Z)}DW axes (θBDZ=0). However, tool-link LT 12 may be free to slide relative to link 16 or 26 to accommodate changes in distance δzD-BW=|zDW-zBW| between links LB 16 and LD 26 as the orientation of tool-link LT 12 changes. In this case, links 48, 48a may connect rigidly to rail-link 34. Alternatively, links 12, 16, 26 may be connected together forming a single rigid body. In this case, links 48 or 48a must be free to slide relative to rail-link 34 to accommodate changes in distance (δzC-AW=|zCW-zAW|) between links LA 14 and LC 24 as the orientation of tool-link LT 12 changes. Optionally, the position of link 48 can be actively controlled using optional linear actuator 35 for 5-DOF control of the tool-link 12 if the tool-link 12 rigidly connects to link LB 16. Alternatively, the position of link 48a can be actively controlled using optional linear actuator 49 for 5-DOF control of the tool-link 12 if the tool-link 12 rigidly connects to link LD 26. Alternatively, 5-DOF and 6-DOF control of the tool-link 12 may be implemented with tool-link linear actuator 36 and tool-link rotary actuator 37 respectively, which connects in series with tool-link 12. Up to three additional rail-links, like 34 can be added in adjacent corners for structural support, along with associated rail-links like 20, 30 and associated links like 41, 61, 48. Alternatively, joints 15, 25 may be implemented with two separate rotating bearings at each end of rail-links 18, 28 as depicted in FIG. 16.



FIG. 19 is a 3D view of a hybrid serial-parallel, multi degrees-of-freedom, coupled Cartesian manipulator 115 of the present teachings. It is the same as manipulator 114 in FIG. 18 except that it is rotated −90° around the {circumflex over (Z)}W axis compared to manipulator 114, i.e. link LA 14 in FIG. 18 is rotated by angle θAZ=−90° as identified in FIG. 19, and link LC 24 in FIG. 18 is rotated by angle (θCZ=−90° as identified in FIG. 19. Manipulator 115 is a parallel joint axes manipulator, so there is no relative twist angle θBDZ between the two links LB 16 and LD 26 around their common {circumflex over (Z)}BW, {circumflex over (Z)}DW axes (θBDZ=0).



FIG. 20 is a 3D view of a parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator 116 of the present teachings. Manipulator 116 comprises parallel joint axes manipulator 114 of FIG. 18 and parallel joint axes manipulator 115 of FIG. 19 joined by common tool-link LT 12. The two parallel joint axes manipulator embodiments 114 and 115 are perpendicular to each other, so that a rotary joint 39 collinear with the tool-link 12 axis {circumflex over (Z)}T, is required to accommodate the relative twist angle θBDZ of all the links along tool-link 12 around their common {circumflex over (Z)}T axis. Linear actuators 19, 19a, 29, 29a manipulate tool-link LT 12 with 4-DOF, i.e. translation along and rotation around axes {circumflex over (X)}W and ŶW. Linear actuators 19, 19a, 29, 29a connect in parallel from common rail-link 34 to the tool-link 12. At one end linear actuators 19, 19a, 29, 29a connect to link 34 through prismatic joints 21, 21a, 31, 31a respectively. At the other end linear actuators 19, 19a, 29, 29a connect to tool-link 12 through link-pairs each with two revolute joints. Additional linear actuator 35, in series with linear actuators 19, 19a, 29, 29a, implements 5-DOF control of the tool-link 12. If the distances between the links along the tool-link 12 are fixed then the links along rail-link 34 must be variable via prismatic joints 35a, 49, 49a to accommodate changes in distance as the tool-link 12 orientation changes. Alternatively, either one of prismatic joints 35a, 49, 49a may be actuated and the remaining 35a, 49, 49a joints are passive. If the distances between the links along rail-link 34 are fixed then the links along tool-link 12 must be free to slide on passive prismatic joints to accommodate changes in distance between the links as the tool-link 12 orientation changes. If one of the prismatic joints 35, 35a, 49, 49a is fixed then 5-DOF control of the tool-link 12 may be implemented with tool-link linear actuator 36. 6-DOF control of the tool-link 12 may be implemented with addition of tool-link rotary actuator 37. Up to three additional rail-links, not shown, like 34 can be added in adjacent corners for structural support of the manipulator, along with associated rail-links like 20, 20a, 30, 30a and associated links like 41, 41a, 61, 61a, 48, 48a.



FIG. 21 is a 3D view of one of four similar components 117 of a parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator with intersecting revolute joint axes {circumflex over (X)}C2, ŶD2, {circumflex over (Z)}D2 respectively numbered as 25, 27, 13 with respective angular rotation angles θC2X, θD2Y, θD2Z. Link LC2 24 connects to rail-link 28 with coaxial revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joint 25 that enables rotation angle θC2X around rail-link 28 and linear displacement coordinate xC2W along rail-link 28. Linear actuator 29 enables motion of link LC2 24 concentric with rail-link 28. Link LD2 26 connects to link LC2 24 through common revolute joint 27 that enables rotation angle θD2Y. Link LD2 26 couples to the tool-link, not shown. Revolute joint 27 may be implemented by two separate rotary bearings on opposite, sides of rail-link 28 to symmetrically distribute the load applied by linear actuator 29 concentric with rail-link 28. Link 26 couples to the adjacent corresponding links 26 of the other similar components 117 through revolute joint 13 that enables rotation displacement angle θBDZ around axis {circumflex over (Z)}D2. Revolute joint 13 may be implemented with two separate rotary bearings on opposite sides of link 24 to symmetrically distribute the load applied by linear actuator 29 concentric with rail-link 28. Revolute joint 13 accommodates relative twist angle between other coaxial links 16 in FIG. 23 along the tool-link axis {circumflex over (Z)}T. Linear actuator 29 connects to link 26 through 3-DOF revolute joints. Link 61 moves along rail-link 30 via prismatic joint 31 depicted by a heavy dashed double-headed arrow. The position of link 48 may be free to slide in the {circumflex over (Z)}W direction along rail-link 34 as depicted by heavy dashed double-headed arrow 49. For illustration, only one rail-link 34 is shown, but actual applications may have additional rail-links like 34 and additional links like 48a supporting the other end of rail-links like 30.



FIG. 22 is a 3D view of the component 118 from FIG. 21, together with structural support components 81, 82, 83. Structural support components 81, 82, 83 provide additional structural support for the tool-link that may be required to support the weight of the manipulator or to support other loads for applications, like machining for example, that transmit loads from linear actuator 49 to a machine tool attached to the tool-link. Structural support components 81, 82, 83 may not be required for components 116 that are supported by passive prismatic joints on rail 34 as depicted by the heavy dashed double-headed arrow 49 in FIG. 21. Structural support components 81, 82, 83 support external loads on the tool-link without transferring those loads to rail-link 28. This is useful for implementations of component 117 that use linear actuators 29 like cables, ball screws or linear motors, which do not support lateral or moment loads. Link 24 rigidly connects to link 81 that is free to move, via a prismatic joint, along rail-link 82. Rail-link 82 rigidly connects to link 83. Link 83 connects to link 61 through a revolute joint that is concentric with rail-link 28. Link 81 is not connected to rail-link 28 therefore, it transmits forces to the tool-link in a parallel-connection with linear actuator 29. In other words, the force transmission path from link 61 through links 81, 82, 83 acts in a parallel-connection with the force transmission path through link 28. For illustration, only one link 83 is shown, but in actual applications, rail-link 82 would typically be supported at both ends by two opposing links 83, 83a. Only one rail-link 82 is shown, but two parallel links 82, 82a may be used to support the two ends of link 24.



FIG. 23 is a 3D view of one of four similar components 119 of a parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator with intersecting revolute joint axes. It is complimentary to component 117 in FIG. 21. Here, link LB2 16 has rotary bearings on both sides along rotation axis {circumflex over (Z)}B2 to couple to adjacent links 16, 26 along the tool-link axis, of other similar components 117, 118 of the parallel connected coupled Cartesian manipulator with intersecting revolute joint axes.



FIG. 24 is a 3D view of a hybrid serial-parallel, coupled Cartesian manipulator 120 of the present teachings, that is composed of component 117 of FIG. 21 and component 119 of FIG. 23 coupled together with connector 85. This is a ‘parallel joint axes, with fixed-distance’, hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator, with links 16, 26 and connector 85 forming a single rigid body tool-link 12 along the {circumflex over (Z)}T axis. Only one connector 85 is shown in FIG. 24. Typically, there is an opposing, connector 85a, not shown, for symmetrical load distribution for structural integrity. The two opposing connectors 85, 85a symmetrically distribute the loads applied by linear actuators 19, 29.



FIG. 25 is a 3D view of a ‘parallel joint axes, with fixed-distance’, hybrid serial-parallel coupled Cartesian manipulator 121 with intersecting revolute joint axes rotated −90° around the {circumflex over (Z)}C1 axis relative to manipulator 120 in FIG. 24. Manipulator 121 is similar to manipulator 120 in FIG. 24 except that both links LB1 16 and LD1 26 have rotary bearings on both sides along rotation axis {circumflex over (Z)}T to couple to the links of the adjacent parallel joint axes manipulator. Note that links 16, 26 are rectangular in manipulator embodiments 120, 121 with the longer side of the rectangle in the ŶB1 direction and the connector 85 attached to the shorter side of the rectangle. This allows 120, 121 to be joined together without interference. Alternatively, the connector 85 may be attached to the other face, 90° around the {circumflex over (Z)}T axis of links 16, 26. In this case, the connector 85 has two slots to accommodate motion of rail-links 18, 28. Furthermore, in this case, the shorter sides of rectangular links 16, 16a are in the ŶB1 direction.



FIG. 26 is a 3D view of a parallel connected manipulator 122 composed of one ‘parallel joint axes, with fixed-distance’, coupled Cartesian manipulator 120 of FIG. 24, and one ‘parallel joint axes, with fixed-distance’, coupled Cartesian manipulator 121 of FIG. 25 joined together, with a revolute joint, along the common tool-link axis {circumflex over (Z)}T. The two parallel joint axes coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments 120, 121 interleave in FIG. 26. Link 16a of parallel joint axes manipulator 120 is between the two corresponding links 16, 26 of parallel joint axes manipulator 121, and link 26 of parallel joint axes manipulator 121 is between the two corresponding links 16a, 26 of parallel joint axes manipulator 120. There is a relative twist angle θBDZ, along the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis, between manipulator embodiments 120 and 121 since they are perpendicular to each other. Rotary bearings, on each side of links 16a, 26 accommodate the relative twist angle θBDZ. This arrangement distributes the revolute joint, between 120 and 121 among three separate collinear rotary bearings, spaced far apart from each other, for high inherent bending stiffness. It also symmetrically distributes the forces applied by linear actuators 19, 29, 19a, 29a. The rotary bearing between links 16a, 26 may be omitted to avoid over constraining three collinear rotary bearings along the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis. The two parallel joint axes manipulator embodiments 120, 121 could also be connected together end-to-end with a single rotary bearing between them; however, this arrangement is less inherently stiff compared to the interleaved implementation of FIG. 26 with separated rotary bearings along the tool-link {circumflex over (Z)}T axis.



FIG. 27 is a 3D view of a parallel connected manipulator 123 that is similar to manipulator 122 in FIG. 26, composed of two parallel joint axes coupled Cartesian manipulator embodiments 120, 121 each with intersecting revolute joint axes; and with the addition of structural support components 81, 82, 83 and opposing connectors 85, 85a for structural support.


Pairs of revolute joints, pairs of prismatic joints, and combination of joints can be considered as coupling links or linkages. Tool-links and links about which joints move or revolve can be considered as rails.


Applications:


Applications for the present teachings are independent of scale: from large cranes down to small nanofabrication manipulators, for example. The manipulator is suitable for subtractive machining processes like, milling, drilling, or laser cutting. It is also suitable for additive processes such as painting or 3D printing. Robotic applications include assembly or welding for example. The manipulator is suitable for motion simulator platforms. Sensing applications include 6 DOF joysticks or 3D shape determination. The axes of the manipulator do not have to be driven by actuators. For example, the manipulator enables manual operations such as cutting or sawing along straight lines at prescribed angles. Tools that can be connected to the manipulator, of the present teachings, may include but are not limited to the following: saw, screw driver, hammer, wrench, linear actuator, rotary actuator, combined linear-rotary actuator, spindle, motorized spindle, subtractive machining tool, drill, end mill, router, brush, scraper, grinder, sander, polisher, riveter, stapler, shovel, pick, rake, jackhammer, knife, scalpel, surgical instrument, needle, pen, pencil, paint brush, paint sprayer, air brush, hose, spray gun, glue gun, liquid dispenser, glue dispenser, mirror, light, laser, imager, camera, microscope, microscope objective, electrical probe, wire bonder, soldering tip, welding rod, welding torch, plasma torch, wire EDM, laser cutter, water jet, print head, additive machining tool, 3D printer head, inkjet print head, pipette tips, end effector, grabber, claw, robotic hand, electromagnet, pick-and-place tool, vacuum chuck, proximity sensor, position sensor, contact sensor, force sensor, torque sensor, joystick or motion simulation platform.


Implementation:


Overview. The manipulator InSm in FIG. 11 is designed for 5-axes milling applications. A machining spindle is rigidly attached to the tool-link LT. Four horizontal ball screw actuators control the 4-DOF position and orientation of the tool-link LT. The manipulator has intersecting joint axes so the ball screw actuators' axial forces directly transmit to the tool-link without imparting radial or moment loads to the ball screw nuts. Furthermore, the ball screws directly control points on the tool-link axis that are in line with the ball screws, for precise positioning and orientation control of the tool-link. The structure is constructed from hollow steel sections. It is stiff to support cutting forces with minimal deflection. Manipulators for other machining applications, like laser or plasma cutting, do not contact the work piece so they can be lighter for fast, agile motion control. They may be constructed from lighter weight materials such as aluminum or carbon fiber.


Ball screw actuators. Four horizontal ball screw actuators control the 4-DOF position and orientation of the machine spindle. Two vertical ball screw actuators, at opposite corners, control the vertical position of the base platform for overall 5-DOF control. Weight, inertial forces and dynamic friction apply radial loads to the four horizontal ball screw actuators. Radial loads on ball screws adversely affect their life. However, design and operational considerations of the present manipulator reduce radial loads to less than 1% of the axial dynamic load rating of the ball screws. A load support link supports the weight of the joints and links along the tool-link as well as forces from the machining spindle's interaction with the work piece. Horizontal beams support the ends of the ball screw shafts on linear rails. Air cylinders compensate the constant weight of the horizontal support beams. However, they do not support the variable inertial forces as the tool-link orientation changes. The horizontal support beams move up or down as the tool-link orientation angle θp changes, where θp is the tool-link polar angle, measured from the vertical {circumflex over (Z)}W axis. The vertical acceleration custom character of the horizontal support beams as a function of the polar angle velocity {dot over (θ)}p and acceleration custom character is,

custom character=zAST(custom charactersin(θp)+{dot over (θ)}p2 cos(θp))  (16)

where zA1T is the distance along the tool-link from frame FT to the link LA1. For example, zA1T=0.75 (m) for the manipulator Insm in FIG. 11. Eq. (1) determines the limits for angular acceleration custom character and angular velocity {dot over (θ)}p of the tool-link. For example, at a polar angle θp=0°, angular velocities {dot over (θ)}p<0.4 (rad/s2) impart







Z
A

W
¨


<

0.1






(

m

s
2


)







acceleration to the horizontal support beam, resulting in radial force of less than ˜1% of the horizontal support beams' weight






m


9.8






(


kg

m


s
2


)







imparted to the ball screw due to the inertia of its mass m (kg).


Ball screw nut adjustment angle. The ball screw nuts rotate around their rotation axes, as the tool-link orientation changes, causing linear position displacements along the ball screw. Therefore, the manipulator control software must adjust the ball screw angular position commands to compensate for the nuts' rotations. For example, link LA1 ball screw nut rotates by angle θA1X. Equation (6) gives angle θA1X as a function of the tool-link LT orientation unit vector {circumflex over (Z)}TW. Ball screw nut adjustment angles θC1X, θA2X, θC2X for the other links LC1, LA2, LC2 are calculated in the same way. The control software must adjust ball screw angular position commands by these angles, due to the orientation of the tool-link.


Components. The manipulator, of the present teachings, can be implemented using standard mechanical, electrical and control components such as, fasteners, bearings, actuators, motors, sensors, controllers, etc.


Joints. Standard components such as linear bearings or bushings can be used for the prismatic joints of the manipulator, of the present teachings. Standard components such as ball bearings, bushings or flexures can be used for the revolute joints. Combined revolute-prismatic bearings or bushings can be used for combined coaxial revolute-prismatic (cylindrical) joints. Spherical joints can be implemented using rod ends. Universal joints can be used for rotational link-pairs with two intersecting axes.


Actuators. Possible linear actuators for the manipulator, of the present teachings, include, but are not limited to the following: belt drive, chain drive, cable drive, ball screw, lead screw, ball spline, ball screw spline, friction drive, rack and pinion gear, linear motor, pneumatic cylinder, hydraulic cylinder, electrohydraulic cylinder, rodless cylinder, piezoelectric drive. There are also non-actuated applications for the manipulator. For example, a manipulator can be setup for manual operation to enable precise cuts along straight lines at prescribed angles. In addition, a manipulator can be used to measure manual inputs from a joystick or position sensor connected to the tool-link.

Claims
  • 1. A manipulator system comprising: a positioner having a primary rail, a first coupling linkage, and a second coupling linkage, said first coupling linkage coupling said primary rail to a base and positioning said primary rail and said second coupling linkage along a first plane;another positioner having a secondary rail, a third coupling linkage, and a fourth coupling linkage, said third coupling linkage coupling said secondary rail to the base and positioning said secondary rail and said fourth coupling linkage along a second plane parallel to the first plane; anda common link coupling to said primary and secondary rails via said second and fourth coupling linkages, the common link defining a longitudinal axis that intersects the first plane and the second plane;each of said second and fourth coupling linkages including a joint for linear motion along the respective rail and rotational motion around the respective rail, and a revolute joint for relative pivoting between the respective rail and said common link;wherein a position and orientation of said common link relative to the base is adjustable by said joints and said revolute joints.
  • 2. The manipulator system of claim 1, wherein: each of said second and fourth coupling linkages includes a joint for linear motion along the common link, wherein the position and orientation of said common link relative to the base is adjustable by said joints for linear motion along the common link.
  • 3. The manipulator of claim 1, wherein the primary rail and secondary rail are parallel.
  • 4. The manipulator system of claim 1, further comprising a tool mounted to said common link.
  • 5. The manipulator system of claim 1, further comprising a support fixed to the base and connected to said first and third coupling linkages.
  • 6. The manipulator system of claim 5, wherein said first coupling linkage is adjustable to move said primary rail relative to the base.
  • 7. The manipulator system of claim 6, wherein said first coupling linkage includes a joint that provides linear motion of said primary rail along said support.
  • 8. The manipulator system of claim 7, wherein said joint of said first coupling linkage provides rotational motion of said primary rail around an axis of said support.
  • 9. The manipulator system of claim 5, wherein said third coupling linkage is adjustable to move said secondary rail relative to the base.
  • 10. The manipulator system of claim 9, wherein said third coupling linkage includes a joint that provides linear motion of said secondary rail along said support.
  • 11. The manipulator system of claim 10, wherein said joint of said third coupling linkage provides rotational motion of said secondary rail around an axis of said support.
  • 12. The manipulator system of claim 5, further comprising a second support fixed to the base.
  • 13. The manipulator system of claim 12, wherein said second support is parallel to said support.
  • 14. The manipulator system of claim 1, wherein said positioner includes at least two primary rails, a first primary rail that is connected to the base via said first coupling linkage, and a second primary rail that is connected to said common link via said second coupling linkage, wherein a joint couples the first and second primary rails together such that said second primary rail is movable along said first primary rail.
  • 15. The manipulator system of claim 14, wherein said joint coupling the first and second primary rails together is a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second primary rail along said first primary rail.
  • 16. The manipulator system of claim 14, wherein said joint coupling the first and second primary rails together includes a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second primary rail along said first primary rail, and a revolute joint that provides rotational motion of said second primary rail around an axis of said revolute joint.
  • 17. The manipulator system of claim 16, wherein said joint further includes a second prismatic joint that said second primary rail is free to slide through, wherein the position of said second prismatic joint is adjustable along said second primary rail.
  • 18. The manipulator system of claim 14, wherein said positioner further includes a third primary rail that is connected to the base via a second support, wherein a joint couples the third and second primary rails together such that said second primary rail is movable along said third primary rail and said first primary rail is parallel to said third primary rail.
  • 19. The manipulator system of claim 18, wherein the joint that couples the third primary rail and the second primary rail together includes a revolute joint for pivoting motion between the third primary rail and the second primary rail.
  • 20. The manipulator system of claim 14, wherein said another positioner includes at least two secondary rails, a first secondary rail that is connected to the base via said third coupling linkage, and a second secondary rail that is connected to said common link via said fourth coupling linkage, wherein a joint couples the first and second secondary rails together such that said second secondary rail is movable along said first secondary rail.
  • 21. The manipulator system of claim 20, wherein said joint coupling the first and second secondary rails includes a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second secondary rail along said first secondary rail.
  • 22. The manipulator system of claim 20, wherein said joint coupling the first and second secondary rails together includes a prismatic joint that provides linear motion of said second secondary rail along said first secondary rail, and a revolute joint that provides rotational motion of said second secondary rail around an axis of said revolute joint.
  • 23. The manipulator system of claim 22, wherein said joint further includes a second prismatic joint that said second secondary rail is free to slide through, wherein the position of said second prismatic joint is adjustable along said second secondary rail.
  • 24. The manipulator system of claim 20, wherein said another positioner further includes a third secondary rail that is connected to the base via a second support, wherein another joint couples the second and third secondary rails together such that said second secondary rail is movable along said third secondary rail and said first secondary rail is parallel to said third primary rail.
  • 25. The manipulator system of claim 20, wherein said first primary rail and said first secondary rail are parallel, and said second primary rail and said second secondary rail are parallel.
  • 26. A manipulator system comprising: a positioner having a first primary rail, a second primary rail, a first coupling linkage, a second coupling linkage, and a third coupling linkage, said first coupling linkage coupling said first primary rail to a base, the third coupling linkage connecting the second primary rail to the first primary rail and positioning said second primary rail and said second coupling linkage along a first plane;another positioner having a first secondary rail, a second secondary rail, a fourth coupling linkage, a fifth coupling linkage, and a sixth coupling linkage, said fourth coupling linkage coupling said first secondary rail to the base, said sixth coupling linkage coupling the first secondary rail to the second secondary rail and positioning said second secondary rail and said fourth coupling linkage along a second plane parallel to the first plane;a common link coupling to said second primary rail and said second secondary rail via said second and fifth coupling linkages, the common link defining a longitudinal axis that intersects the first plane and the second plane;the third coupling linkage including a prismatic joint for linear motion of the second primary rail along the first primary rail, and the sixth coupling linkage including a prismatic joint for linear motion of the second secondary rail along the first secondary rail;the first coupling linkage having a prismatic joint for linear motion of the first primary rail along a support, and the fourth coupling linkage having a prismatic joint for linear motion of the first secondary rail along the support;each of said second and fifth coupling linkages including a joint for linear motion along the respective rail and rotational motion around the respective rail, and a revolute joint for relative pivoting between the respective rail and said common link;wherein the second primary rail and the second secondary rail are parallel;wherein the revolute joint of the second coupling link has a revolute axis about which it rotates and the revolute joint of the fifth coupling linkage has a revolute axis about which it rotates, the revolute axis of the second coupling link being parallel to the revolute axis of the fifth coupling linkage;wherein a position and orientation of said common link relative to the base is adjustable by said joints and said revolute joints.
  • 27. A parallel connected manipulator system comprising: a primary manipulator system;a secondary manipulator system;said primary manipulator system connected in parallel with said secondary manipulator system via a support, wherein a coupling linkage of said primary manipulator system connects to the support between two coupling linkages of said secondary manipulator system, wherein one of the two coupling linkages of said secondary manipulator system connects to the support between the coupling linkage of said primary manipulator and another coupling linkage of said primary manipulator system;a common link of said primary manipulator system coupling to a common link of said secondary manipulator system, forming a connected common link, wherein a twist angle is allowable between said common link of said primary manipulator system and said common link of said secondary manipulator system;the support connecting said primary manipulator system and said secondary manipulator system to a base;wherein said base is movable along said support.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4341502 Makino Jul 1982 A
4976582 Clavel Dec 1990 A
6557432 Rosheim May 2003 B2
7300240 Brogardh Nov 2007 B2
7950306 Stuart May 2011 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
WO-03106115 Dec 2003 WO
WO-2019069077 Apr 2019 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (20)
Entry
N. Seward et al: “A New 6-DOF Parallel Robot With Simple Kinematic Model”, Proc.IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China, published 2014, 10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907449, 6 Pages.
D. Stewart: “A Platform With Six Degress of Freedom”, Proc IMechE, Part A: J Power and Energy, vol. 180, part 1, No. 15, published 1965-1966, pp. 371-386.
X. Liu, et al: On the Analysis of a New Spatial Three-Degrees-of-Freedom Parallel Manipulator. IEEE Trans of Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, No. 6, published Dec. 2001, pp. 959-968.
C. Gosselin: “Compact Dynamic Models for the Tripteron and Quadrupteron Parallel Manipulators”, Proc. IMechE, vol. 223, part 1, published 2009, pp. 1-11.
X. Xiao, et al: “Configuration Analysis and Design of a Multidimensional Tele-Operator Based on a 3-P(4S) Parallel Mechanism”, J Intell Robot Syst, vol. 90, published 2018, pp. 339-348.
V.E. Gough et al: Contribution to discussion of paper on research in automobile stability, control and tyre performance, Proc. Auto Div. Inst. Mech Eng, vol. 171, published 1957, pp. 392-395. 4 Pages.
Craig, J.J.: “Introduction to robotics: mechanics and control”, Addison-Wesley, Silma, Inc., Reading, Mass., published 1989; pp. 374-376. 5 Pages.
X.Z. Zheng, et al: “Kinematic Analysis of a Hybrid Serial-Parallel Manipulator”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, vol. 23, published 2004, pp. 925-930.
P. Wenger et al: “Kinematic Analysis of a New Parallel Machine Tool: The Orthoglide”, 7th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, Slovenia, published Jun. 2000, pp. 1-11.
S. Carlo et al:“Kinematic Analysis and Trajectory Planning of the Orthoglide 5-Axis”, IDETC/CIE, published Aug. 2-5, 2015, Boston, USA. pp. 1-10.
X. Kong et al: “Kinematics and Singularity Analysis of a Novel Type of 3-CRR 3-DOF Translational Parallel Manipulator” Int. J of Robotics Research, vol. 21, No. 9, published Sep. 2002, pp. 791-798.
T.K. Tanev: “Kinematics of a Hybrid (parallel-serial) Robot Manipulator”, Mech and Mach Theory, Central Laboratory of Mechatronics and Instrucmentation, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Sofia, Bulgaria, vol. 35, published 2000, pp. 1183-1196.
F. Gao et al: “New Kinematic Structures for 2-, 3-, 4- and 5-DOF Parallel Manipulator Designs”, Mech and Mach Theory, vol. 37, published 2002, pp. 1395-1411.
M. Weck et al.: “Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools—Current State and Future Potentials” Annals of the CIRP, vol. 51, No. 2, published 2002 pp. 671-681.
J.P. Merlet: “Parallel Robots” Second Edition, vol. 128, published 2006, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands 417 Pages.
D.L. Pieper: “The Kinematics of Manipulators Under Computer Control”, Ph, D. Thesis, Stanford University, Oct. 24, 1968 Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 174 Pages.
B. Siciliano, et al: The Tricept Robot: Inverse Kinematics, Manipulability Analysis and Closed-Loop Direct Kinematics Algorithm, Robotica, vol. 17, publised 1999 United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, pp. 437-445.
F. Pierrot: “Towards Non-Hexapod Mechanisms for High Performance Parallel Machines”, Proceedings of 26th Annual Conference od the IEEE, IECON 2000, Nagoya, vol. 1, pp. 229-234.
X. Kong et al: “Type Synthesis of 5-DOF Parallel Manipulators Based on Screw Theory”, Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 22, No. 10, published May 2005, pp. 535-547.
V.E. Gough et al: “Universal tyre test machine”, Proc. 9th Intern. Automobile technical congress FISITA, ImechE, London: Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 117, pp. 117-262, published 1962. 34 Pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200047333 A1 Feb 2020 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
62773156 Nov 2018 US
62717295 Aug 2018 US