The present invention relates generally to a crash attenuator, and in particular, to a crash attenuator adapted for mounting to a vehicle and which is collapsible during an impact.
Truck Mounted Attenuators (TMAs) have been used for many years on our nation's highways to protect road workers in works zones and other areas adjacent to high speed traffic. These crash cushions are typically mounted to the back of a work truck or other shadow vehicle and then placed some distance behind the work being done. In this way they protect the road workers from errant vehicles that may have left the open travel lanes and would otherwise endanger the road workers. Likewise there may be road maintenance operations that require a slow moving shadow vehicle that is driven by one of the road workers. In this instance, the driver of the shadow vehicle is also protected by the Truck Mounted attenuator, should a vehicle impact it.
The road workers are not the only ones deriving benefits from a TMA. Drivers of errant vehicles also benefit, as the impact with the crash cushion may lessen the potential injuries from such an impact.
Crash cushions, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,642,792 to June and U.S. Pat. No. 6,092,959 to Leonhardt, include cartridges supported by a support structure, which may be released and allowed to collapse, for example with complex trigger mechanisms or release cables that stabilize the systems and hold them rigid until they were impacted by an errant vehicle. Such systems may be expensive, being configured with multiple hinge points that require precise welding and machining, so that all of the hinge members are aligned appropriately during assembly.
The present invention is defined by the following claims, and nothing in this section should be considered to be a limitation on those claims.
In one aspect, one embodiment of a crash attenuator includes a frame having a first frame member and a second frame member rigidly connected with a hinge assembly in a pre-impact configuration. The first and second frames are hingedly connected with the hinge assembly in an impact configuration, wherein the hinge assembly comprises a living hinge when the hinge assembly is in the impact configuration.
In another aspect, a method of attenuating energy from an impacting vehicle with a crash attenuator includes providing a frame having a first frame member and a second frame member rigidly connected with a hinge assembly in a pre-impact configuration, impacting the crash attenuator, and moving the first frame member relative to the second frame member about the hinge assembly to an impact configuration, with the hinge assembly acting as a living hinge as the first and second frame members are moved to the impact configuration.
The various embodiments of the crash attenuator, and methods of manufacture and use thereof, provide significant advantages over other crash attenuator systems. For example and without limitation, the frames can be easily and quickly assembled with a minimum of parts, with the hinge assemblies providing both the rigid connection of the frame members during normal operation, and also providing a living hinge, allowing for collapse of the attenuator, during an impact configuration.
The foregoing paragraphs have been provided by way of general introduction, and are not intended to limit the scope of the following claims. The various preferred embodiments, together with further advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
It should be understood that the term “longitudinal,” as used herein means of or relating to length or the lengthwise direction 100 between an impact end 110 and an attachment end 120 of a crash attenuator 1, and is aligned with and defines an “axial impact direction” which is generally parallel to the direction of traffic flow. The term “lateral,” as used herein, means directed between or toward (or perpendicular to) the sides of the crash attenuator in a sideways direction 160. The term “front,” “forward,” “forwardly,” and variations thereof refer to the position or orientation relative to the attachment end 120, which connects the crash attenuator 1 to a shadow vehicle 2 or the like, while the term “rear, “rearward,” “rearwardly,” and variations thereof refer to the position or orientation relative to the impact end 110 of the crash attenuator 1, which receives an impacting vehicle. The term “downstream” refers to the position or orientation moving away from the impact end 110 and toward the attachment end 120 of the crash attenuator 1, while the term “upstream” refers to the position or orientation moving toward the impact end 110 and away from the attachment end 120 of the crash attenuator 1. Therefore, for example, a component positioned downstream of another component is closer to the attachment end 120, and vice versa, a component positioned upstream of another component is closer to the impact end 110. The term “outboard” refers to the direction or orientation towards the outermost edges of the crash attenuator 1, while the term “inboard” refers to the direction or orientation away from the outermost edges and towards the center of the crash attenuator 1. The term “upper” refers to the vertical direction or orientation towards the top most edge of the crash attenuator 1, while the term “lower” refers to the vertical direction or orientation towards the ground. The term “coupled” means connected to or engaged with, whether directly or indirectly, for example with an intervening member, and does not require the engagement to be fixed or permanent, although it may be fixed or permanent, and includes both mechanical and electrical connection. It should be understood that the use of numerical terms “first,” “second” and “third” as used herein does not refer to any particular sequence or order of components; for example “first” and “second” bays may refer to any sequence of such bays, and is not limited to the first and second bays unless otherwise specified. The term “frangible,” as used herein means to break into two or more pieces. The term “yield” means to bend or deform, without breaking.
Of course it should be understood that a wide range of changes could be made to embodiments described above. For instance, the crash attenuator could be formed into more than two bays and each bay could have one, many, or no cartridges disposed within it. The crash attenuator could also be of the form disclosed in
In preferred embodiments frame elements 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 50 are constructed from welded steel, including structural steel tubing plate, angle, and other steel shapes as appropriate. Other embodiments may use other structural materials for these elements, such as aluminum, plastics, fiberglass, and etc. In preferred embodiments, cartridges 10, 11, and 12 are made from aluminum cells, for instance as was described U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,481 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,092,959. Other embodiments may use other appropriate crushable materials such as steel sheet, tin plated steel, plastic, or cardboard covered with an appropriate shell.
At the ends of first and second frame members, or rear tubes 85 and front tubes 86, are placed outer attachment brackets 82 and inner attachment brackets 83. In the embodiment shown in
Outer attachment brackets 82 and inner attachment brackets 83 are provided with mounting holes 90 to allow fasteners 60 (not shown) to attach the side frame 5 to other members of the frame of crash attenuator 1. Other embodiments may use other assembly methods, such as riveting welding, brazing, and etc. instead of bolts. Although outer attachment brackets 82 are of a similar design to inner attachment brackets 83 in the embodiment shown in
At the ends of rear tubes 185 are placed outer attachment brackets 182 and inner attachment brackets 183. At the ends of front tubes 186 are placed outer straight attachment brackets 184 and inner attachment brackets 183. Although the embodiment shown in
Although rear tubes 85 and 185 and front tubes 86 and 186 are shown as being similar in length in the embodiments of
As shown in
Although attachment bracket 283 and outer hinge member 280 are weakened by slots 288 and 289, other methods could be used to provide weakened regions and weaken various attachment brackets and hinge members, as is needed in certain designs. For instance, as was previously disclosed, the material used can be of different thicknesses to promote one bracket or hinge member before another. In addition, a hole, or a series of holes could be used in place of slots 288 and 289. Likewise, parts of differing widths could be used, as well as parts that have been heat treated, have notches, or parts of different materials.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As such, it is intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting and that it is the appended claims, including all equivalents thereof, which are intended to define the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/876,523, filed Sep. 11, 2013, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2984512 | Shaginaw | May 1961 | A |
3506295 | Yancey | Apr 1970 | A |
3674115 | Young et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3717223 | Alfes | Feb 1973 | A |
3757562 | Goldberg et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3930665 | Ikawa | Jan 1976 | A |
3944187 | Walker | Mar 1976 | A |
3972390 | Melton et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4008915 | Walker | Feb 1977 | A |
4071970 | Strizki | Feb 1978 | A |
4190275 | Mileti | Feb 1980 | A |
4204659 | Phillips et al. | May 1980 | A |
4221413 | Bonnetain | Sep 1980 | A |
4227593 | Bricmont et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4352484 | Gertz et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4407484 | Meinzer | Oct 1983 | A |
4413856 | McMahan et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4452431 | Stephens et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4552341 | Zucker et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4600178 | Zucker et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4635981 | Friton | Jan 1987 | A |
4655434 | Bronstad | Apr 1987 | A |
4658941 | Gottwald et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4674911 | Gertz | Jun 1987 | A |
4711481 | Krage et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4770420 | Gottwald et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
5052732 | Oplet et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5123775 | Bryant | Jun 1992 | A |
5199755 | Gertz | Apr 1993 | A |
5248129 | Gertz | Sep 1993 | A |
5403112 | Carney | Apr 1995 | A |
5403113 | Gertz et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5551796 | Anderson, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577861 | Oberth et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5642792 | June | Jul 1997 | A |
5697657 | Unrath, Sr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5797592 | Machado | Aug 1998 | A |
5823584 | Carney, III | Oct 1998 | A |
5851005 | Muller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5868521 | Oberth et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5947452 | Albritton | Sep 1999 | A |
6024341 | Gertz | Feb 2000 | A |
6092959 | Leonhardt et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098767 | Unrath | Aug 2000 | A |
6116805 | Gertz | Sep 2000 | A |
6183042 | Unrath | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186565 | Unrath | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6203079 | Breed | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244637 | Leonhardt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264258 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6343821 | Breed | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6394513 | Rossmann | May 2002 | B2 |
6457570 | Reid et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6481920 | Leonhardt et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6523872 | Breed | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6554529 | Stephens et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6579034 | Welch et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581992 | Gertz | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6619491 | Payne et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6668989 | Reid et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6866284 | Carlsson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886813 | Albritton | May 2005 | B2 |
6905282 | Leonhardt et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6926324 | Gertz | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6942263 | Welch et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7112004 | Alberson et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125198 | Schiefferly et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7216904 | Thomas | May 2007 | B2 |
7243964 | Gertz | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7341397 | Murphy | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7438337 | Gertz | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7604268 | Unrath, Sr. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7690687 | Reid et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735614 | Carlsson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7802829 | Maus | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7874572 | Buehler et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7874792 | Tholen et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7931317 | Kern | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8074761 | LaTurner et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8136830 | Buehler et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8276956 | Maus | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8360400 | Leonhardt et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388012 | Buehler et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8464825 | LaTurner et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8556286 | Eckert et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20030113160 | Welch et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040251698 | Welch et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050046207 | Rossmann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060151971 | Buehler et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070046041 | Thomas | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1239581 | Apr 1967 | DE |
2286160 | Aug 1995 | GB |
WO 9405527 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9405527 | Mar 1994 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 6,315,490, 11/2001, Leonhardt et al. (withdrawn) |
Marquis, E.C., et al., “Texas Crash Cushion Trailer to Protect Highway Maintenance Vehicles” Research Report 146-6, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station Texas, 1972, 45 pages. |
International Search Report issued in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US14/54050, mailed Dec. 14, 2014, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150069771 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61876523 | Sep 2013 | US |