The present invention relates to signal processing and more particularly to cross-over frequency selection and optimization for correcting the frequency response of each speaker in a speaker system to produce a desired output.
Modern sound systems have become increasingly capable and sophisticated. Such systems may be utilized for listening to music or integrated into a home theater system. One important aspect of any sound system is the speaker suite used to convert electrical signals to sound waves. An example of a modern speaker suite is a multi-channel 5.1 channel speaker system comprising six separate speakers (or electroacoustic transducers) namely: a center speaker, front left speaker, front right speaker, rear left speaker, rear right speaker, and a subwoofer speaker. The center, front left, front right, rear left, and rear right speakers (commonly referred to as satellite speakers) of such systems generally provide moderate to high frequency sound waves, and the subwoofer provides low frequency sound waves. The allocation of frequency bands to speakers for sound wave reproduction requires that the electrical signal provided to each speaker be filtered to match the desired sound wave frequency range for each speaker. Because different speakers, rooms, and listener positions may influence how each speaker is heard, accurate sound reproduction may require to adjusting or tuning the filtering for each listening environment.
Cross-over filters (also called base-management filters) are commonly used to allocate the frequency bands in speaker systems. Because each speaker is designed (or dedicated) for optimal performance over a limited range of frequencies, the cross-over filters are frequency domain splitters for filtering the signal delivered to each speaker.
Common shortcomings of known cross-over filters include an inability to achieve a net or recombined amplitude response, when measured by a microphone in a reverberant room, which is sufficiently flat or constant around the cross-over region to provide accurate sound reproduction. For example, a listener may receive sound waves from multiple speakers such as a subwoofer and satellite speakers, which are at non-coincident positions. If these sound waves are substantially out of phase (viz., substantially incoherent), the waves may to some extent cancel each other, resulting in a spectral notch in the net frequency response of the audio system. Alternatively, the complex addition of these sound waves may create large variations in the magnitude response in the net or combined subwoofer and satellite speaker response.
The present invention addresses the above and other needs by providing a system and method which provide a least a single stage optimization process which optimizes flatness around a cross-over region. A first stage determines an optimal cross-over frequency by minimizing an objective function in a region around the cross-over frequency. Such objective function measures the variation of the magnitude response in the cross-over region. An optional second stage applies all-pass filtering to reduce incoherent addition of signals from different speakers in the cross-over region. The all-pass filters may be included in signal processing circuitry associated with either each of the satellite speaker channels or the subwoofer channel or both, and provides a frequency dependent phase adjustment to reduce incoherency between the satellite speakers and the subwoofer. The all-pass filters may be derived using a recursive adaptive algorithm or a constrained optimization algorithm. Such all-pass filters may further be used to reduce or eliminate incoherency between individual satellite speakers.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for minimizing the spectral deviations of the net subwoofer and satellite speaker response in a cross-over region. The method comprises measuring the full-range (i.e., non bass-managed or without high pass or low pass filtering) subwoofer and satellite speaker response in at least one position in a room, selecting a cross-over region, selecting a set of candidate cross-over frequencies and corresponding bass-management filters for the subwoofer and the satellite speaker, applying the corresponding bass-management filters to the subwoofer and satellite speaker full-range response, level matching the bass-managed subwoofer and satellite speaker response, performing addition of the subwoofer and satellite speaker response to obtain a net bass-managed subwoofer and satellite speaker response, computing an objective function using the net response for each of the candidate cross-over frequencies, and selecting the candidate cross-over frequencies resulting in the lowest objective function. The method may further included an additional step of all-pass filtering to further attenuate the spectral notch.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following drawings wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding components throughout the several views of the drawings.
The following description is of the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out the invention. This description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of describing one or more preferred embodiments of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the claims.
A typical home theater 10 is shown in
Signal processors 12 used in home theater systems 10, which home theater systems 10 includes a subwoofer 22, also generally include cross-over (or bass-management) filters 30a-30e and 32 as shown in
An example of a system including a prior art signal processor 12 as described in
While such THX® speaker system certified signal processors conform to the THX® speaker system standard, many speaker systems do not include THX® speaker system certified signal processors. Such non-THX® systems (and even THX® speaker systems) often benefit from selection of a cross-over frequency dependent upon the signal processor 12, satellite speakers 16, 18a, 18b, 20a, 20b, subwoofer speaker 22, listener position, and listener preference (in the present application, the term “satellite speaker” is applied to any non-subwoofer in the speaker system). In the instance of non-THX® speaker systems, the 24 dB/octave and 12 dB/octave filter slopes (see
The satellite speakers 16, 18a, 18b, 20a, 20b, and subwoofer speaker 22, as shown in
The spectral notch 50 and/or amplitude variations in the crossover region may contribute to loss of acoustical efficiency because some of the sound around the cross-over frequency may be undesirably attenuated or amplified. For example, the spectral notch 50 may result in a significant loss of sound reproduction to as low as 40 Hz (about the lowest frequency which the center channel speaker 16 is capable of producing). Such spectral notches have been verified using real world measurements, where the subwoofer speaker 22 and satellite speakers 16, 18a, 18b, 20a, and 20b were excited with a broadband stimuli (for example, log-chirp signal) and the net response was de-convolved from the measured signal.
Further, known signal processors 12 may include equalization filters 52a-52e, and 54, as shown in
The present invention provides a system and method for minimizing the spectral notching 50 and/or response variations in the crossover region. While the embodiment of the present invention described herein does not describe the application of the present invention to systems including equalization filters for each channel, the method of the present invention is easily extended to such systems.
Known signal processors 12 (see
The home theater 10 generally resides in a room comprising an acoustic enclosure which can be modeled as a linear system whose behavior at a particular listening position is characterized by a time domain impulse function, h(n); n {0, 1, 2, . . . }. The time domain impulse response h(n) is generally called the room impulse response which has an associated frequency response, H(ejω) which is a function of frequency (for example, between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz). H(ejω) is generally referred to the Room Transfer Function (RTF). The time domain response h(n) and the frequency domain response RTF are linearly related through the Fourier transform, that is, given one we can find the other via the Fourier relations, wherein the Fourier transform of the time domain response yields the RTF. The RTF provides a complete description of the changes the acoustic signal undergoes when it travels from a source to a receiver (microphone/listener). The RTF may be measured by transmitting an appropriate signal, for example, a logarithmic chirp signal, from a speaker, and deconvolving a response at a listener position. The signal at a listening position 24 consists of direct path components, discrete reflections which arrive a few milliseconds after the direct path components, as well as reverberant field components.
An objective function which is particularly useful for characterizing the magnitude response is the spectral deviation measure E. The spectral deviation measure E is a measure of the variation of the spectral response at discrete frequencies in the cross-over region, from an average spectral response Δ taken over the entire cross-over region. When the effects of the choice of the cross-over frequency are bandlimited around the cross-over region, the spectral deviation measure E is quite effective at predicting the behavior of the resulting magnitude response around the cross-over region. The spectral deviation measure E may be defined as:
where the average spectral deviation Δ is:
and the net subwoofer and satellite speaker response E(ejω) is,
E(eew)=Hsub(ejw)+Hsat(ejw)
and P is the number of discrete selectable cross-over frequencies. Alternatively, other objective functions employing a standard deviation rule (with or without frequency weighting) may be employed. An example of a typical cross-over region is between L Hz and M Hz (e.g., L=30 and M=200), and an example of a set of discrete selectable cross-over frequencies comprises frequencies between 30 Hz and 200 Hz in N Hz steps (e.g., N=10).
The Room Transfer Function H(ejω) may be obtained using any of several well known methods. A preferred method is the application of a pseudo-random sequence to the speaker, and deconvolving the response at the listener position 24. One such method comprises cross-correlating a measured signal with a pseudo-random sequence. A particularly useful pseudo-random signal is a binary Maximum Length Sequence (MLS).
Another method for computing the Room Transfer Function H(ejω) comprises a circular deconvolution wherein the measured signal is Fourier transformed, divided by the Fourier transform of the input signal, and the result is inverse Fourier transformed. A preferred signal for this method is a logarithmic sweep.
The magnitude responses for an exemplar speaker system for cross-over frequencies of 30 Hz, 40 Hz, 50 Hz, 60 Hz, 70 Hz, 80 Hz, 90 Hz, and 100 Hz are shown in
Comparing the
Thus, the cross-over frequency selection described above provides measurable attenuation of the spectral notch and/or minimization of the spectral deviations in the crossover region. In some cases, where further attenuation of the spectral notch is desired, all-pass filters 60a-60e may be included in the signal processor 12, as shown in
The second stage of attenuation of the spectral notch is achieved by adaptively minimizing a phase term:
φsub(w)−φspeaker(w)−φA
where:
φsub(w):=the phase spectrum for the subwoofer;
φspeaker(w):=the phase spectrum for the satellite speaker 16, 18a, 18b, 20a, or 20b; and
φA
The M cascade all-pass filter AM may be expressed as:
and the resulting frequency dependent phase shift is:
A second objective function, J(n) is:
The terms ri and θi may be determined using an adaptive recursive formula by minimizing the objective function J(n) with respect to ri and θi. The update equations are:
where μr and μθ are adaptation rate control parameters chosen to guarantee stable convergence and are typically between zero and one. Finally, the gradients of the objective function J(n) with respect to the parameters of the all-pass function is are:
where:
E(φ(w))+φsubwoofer(w)−φspeaker(w)−φA
and,
In order to guarantee stability, the magnitude of the pole radius rj(n) is preferably kept less than one. A preferable method for keeping the magnitude of the pole radius ri(n) less than one is to randomize ri(n) between zero and one whenever ri(n) is greater than or equal to one.
A first a method according to the present invention is described in
Computing the objective function may comprise computing the spectral deviation measure E, or computing a standard deviation with or without frequency weighting. Level matching is comparing the speaker response without bass-management to the speaker response with bass-management, and is preferably comparing the root-mean-square (RMS) level of the satellite speaker response, without bass-management, using C-weighting and test noise (e.g., THX test noise) to the (RMS) level of the satellite speaker response, with bass-management, using C-weighting and test noise.
The first method may further address the selection of a cross-over frequency for multiple listener locations by computing a multiplicity of objective functions (preferably computing a multiplicity of spectral deviation measures E) for a multiplicity of candidate cross-over frequencies at the multiplicity of different listen locations, averaging the multiplicity of objective functions over the multiplicity of different listen locations to obtain an average objective function for each of the multiplicity of candidate cross-over frequencies, and selecting the candidate cross-over frequencies which provides the lowest average objective function.
A second method according to the present invention is described in
While the invention herein disclosed has been described by means of specific embodiments and applications thereof, numerous modifications and variations could be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention set forth in the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/222,001, filed on Sep. 7, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/607,602, filed Sep. 7, 2004, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The present application further incorporates by reference the related patent application for “Phase Equalization for Multi-Channel Loudspeaker-room Responses” filed on Sep. 7, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3067297 | Fink | Dec 1962 | A |
4109107 | Boast | Aug 1978 | A |
4514596 | Garner et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4694498 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4698842 | Mackie et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4771466 | Modafferi | Sep 1988 | A |
4888809 | Knibbeler | Dec 1989 | A |
4908868 | McTaggart | Mar 1990 | A |
5185801 | Meyer et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5319714 | McTaggart | Jun 1994 | A |
5377274 | Meyer et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5572443 | Emoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5627899 | Craven et al. | May 1997 | A |
5771294 | Inoue et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5815580 | Craven et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5930373 | Shashoua et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930374 | Werrbach et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6064770 | Scarth et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072877 | Abel | Jun 2000 | A |
6118875 | Moller et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6134330 | De Poortere et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6519344 | Yajima et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6650756 | Saito et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650776 | Ihara et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6681019 | Kitano et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6721428 | Allred et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6760451 | Craven et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6792114 | Kates et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6854005 | Thiele | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6956955 | Brungart | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6980665 | Kates | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7158643 | Lavoie et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7567675 | Bharitkar et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574009 | Aubauer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7720237 | Bharitkar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7769183 | Bharitkar et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7826626 | Bharitkar et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010038702 | Lavoie et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030112981 | McWilliam et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030200236 | Hong | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030235318 | Bharitkar et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050031135 | Devantier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050069153 | Hall et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094821 | Bharitkar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157891 | Johansen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050220312 | Kasai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060056646 | Bharitkar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062404 | Bharitkar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090202082 | Bharitkar et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100189282 | Bharitkar et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Bhariktar, Sunil, A Classification Scheme for Acoustical Room Responses, IEEE, Aug. 2001, 2:671-674. |
Bharitkar et al, Multiple Point Room Response Equalization Using Clustering, Apr. 24, 2001, pp. 1-24. |
Bharitkar, S., A Cluster Centroid Method for Room Respone Equilization at Multiple Locations, Applications of Signal Processing To Audio and Acoustics, Oct. 2001, pp. 55-58. |
Elliot, Multiple-Point Equalization in a Room Using Adaptive Digital Filters, Journal of Audio Engineering Society, Nov. 1989, 37:899-907. |
Hatziantaniou, Panagiotis, Results for Room Acoustics Equalisation Based on Smooth Responses, Audio Group, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Patras, (date unknown). |
http://www.snellacoustics.com/IRCSI000.htm, Snell Acoustics RCS 1000 Digital Room Correction System (date unknown). |
International Search Report dated Oct. 3, 2003 for PCT/US03/16226. |
Kumin, Daniel, Snell Acoustics RCS 1000 Room-Correction System, Audio, Nov. 1997, 81(11):96-102. |
Radiovic et al, Nonminimum-Phase Equalization and Its Subjective Importance in Room Acoustics, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, vol. 8, No. 6, Nov. 2000. |
Brandenstein et al, Least-Squares Approximation of FIR by IIR Digital Filters, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 46(1):21-30 (1998). |
Yang et al, Auditory Representations of Acoustic Signals, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38(2):824-839 (1992). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100310092 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60607602 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11222001 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 12860800 | US |