It is not easy to measure currents accurately and over large dynamic ranges.
The most common method of current sensing is to pass the current through a resistor (a current shunt) and to measure the resulting voltage drop, which develops according to Ohm's law. A well-known current sensor circuit based on this principle is illustrated in
Input terminals 3/3a and 4/4a allow connection of the current shunt 1 into the circuit where current has to be measured.
An electronic circuit (omitted for clarity in
Pick-up points 7 and 8 on the current shunt 1 follow the principle of “Kelvin sensing” that reduces errors associated with resistance of the sense connections and wires, considering the fact that there is almost no current in these sensing connections. The point made by “Kelvin sensing” is that because the current in lines 9 and 10 is extremely small, the voltage drop along lines 9 and 10 is likewise extremely small, and thus the voltage drop along lines 9 and 10 does not introduce very much error in the overall current measurement process. It will be appreciated that the pick-up points 7 and 8 are separate from and are specifically located apart from the main terminals 3a/4a of the shunt.
Typically, the shunt is created by joining three conducting sections with varying conductive properties. Sections 3 and 4 are made from highly conductive material (typically copper), and central section 2 is made from a material that has higher resistance as compared with that of copper, a material whose resistance has little or no dependence upon the magnitude of the current passing through the material, and the material having a resistance that has little or no dependence upon the temperature of the material. Some investigators choose this material to be “manganin”, an alloy of typically 86% copper, 12% manganese, and 2% nickel. The reasons for such a construction, among a few, include the desire to equalize the current density in the resistive material 2, and to minimize errors arising out of resistance variations due to magnitude of current or due to changes in temperature. The choice to have a central section differing in its material from end sections, and the choice of particular material for that central section, are outside of the scope of the present discussion, and as will later be appreciated, the teachings of the invention offer their benefits in ways that are not dependent upon such choices.
The thoughtful reader will appreciate that in the particular case where a shunt is selected to have such a central section 2 of non-identical material from the end sections, the shunt amounts to a thermocouple circuit, with the junctions of the thermocouples created by the joining of dissimilar materials in areas 5 and 6, and schematically depicted in the electrical model in
Furthermore, the attachment method of the sense lines 9 and 10 at points 7 and 8 may have a large effect on the total thermoelectric errors, as illustrated in
The same considerations apply for the thermocouples created at junction 8 and shown schematically in
Stating the situation in a different way and looking at
The designer of a shunt as shown in
The designer of the shunt as shown in
It would be very desirable if apparatus could be devised which would reduce or eliminate errors in the derived current value that arise because of such thermoelectric voltages.
Structures are described in which identical or substantially identical materials are used for sense lines as for the shunt materials to which the sense lines are electrically connected, and in which many if not all thermocouple-induced errors are eliminated when compared with prior-art structures. Methods and circuits for reduction of errors in a current shunt are disclosed, for example sensing lines for Kelvin sensing in which the sensing lines are of identical material to the high-resistance portions of the shunt, and welded thereto. This allows application of a current shunt with lower output voltage and thus lower power losses than the contemporary art implementations, while maintaining high accuracy in the face of temperature changes.
This invention will be described with respect to a drawing in several figures, of which:
a, 1b, and 1c depict prior-art circuits;
a, 2b, 2c and 2d disclose one method of the invention;
a and 3b show a current shunt with expanded capabilities according to the invention; and
a and 4b display an alternate simplified embodiment that could be used under specific limited conditions.
One purpose of the invention is to reduce the errors associated with thermoelectric voltages in the current shunt. In the simplest form (referring to
When all the above requirements a.) through e.) are fulfilled, the measurements from the resulting current shunt 11 should be substantially free from thermoelectric errors.
An alert reader will notice that voltage-sensing points 15/16 according to the invention are located contrary to the previous-art method of maximizing the voltage output from the current shunt. Saying this another way, in
Indeed the output voltage of the shunt according to the invention may be somewhat smaller compared to the output voltage of the shunt according to the prior art, while still providing improved accuracy as compared with the prior-art arrangement, even if all other parameters of the shunt and the passing current through the shunt are the same.
One of the points being made here is that the improved shunt offers an output signal that is effectively free from thermoelectric errors, and that some reduction in the output signal (as compared with the prior art) can be tolerated and readily compensated for by the electronic measuring apparatus; for example, such measuring systems are described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,264,216 entitled “High-accuracy low-power current sensor with large dynamic range” and in published international patent application WO12/117275 entitled “Current sensor”.
In addition, a signal that is not contaminated with thermoelectric errors can be much smaller for the same signal-to-error ratio than a large signal that has substantial error component; this allows significant reduction of energy loss due to heating in the shunt. Saying this another way, the improved signal-to-noise ratio offered by the teachings of the invention permit the shunt designer to design it so as to have a smaller resistance. The smaller resistance means less I2R loss in the shunt and thus less heating. Less heating means less energy loss due to the heating, and means smaller temperature-related errors introduced into the measurement process. Compared with prior art, this invention allows one or more orders of magnitude of improvement for the losses in the shunt.
a discloses a current shunt 12 that can supply information about the actual operating temperature of the shunt element 2, in addition to reduced thermoelectric errors.
Two extra sensing points are created at locations 15a and 16a, with material of the leads 19a/20a being copper or other suitable material, but not the same material as the shunt element 2 or leads 19/20. The attachment method should be the same as outlined in requirement c.) above.
The alert reader that appreciated the existence of thermocouples at 5 and 6 in
b presents an electrical schematic model of the shunt 12 in
While voltage sensing points 15/16 are preferably located on the center line of the shunt 12 (in accord to the best current measurement functionality), the points 15a and 16a are located on the lines emanating from points 15/16 and perpendicular to the center line of the shunt; the intent here is that point 15a is located at such a position on the section 2 that its temperature is substantially the same as the temperature of point 15; likewise for points 16a and 16 (the reader is reminded that the temperatures of points 15 and 16 are not necessarily the same).
At the same time any voltage differential from point 15a to point 15, and between 16a and 16, generated due to the current passing through the shunt, is nearly zero.
Stated differently, pair 15a/15 is located on what are hoped to be isopotential and isothermal lines (as present on element 2 due to temperature gradients and the current passing through the shunt); likewise for pair 16a/16.
A further improvement of the shunt in
In
Isothermal block 23 keeps the temperature of the leads 19/20 the same at joints 21/22 to the input lines 24 of the electrical measuring apparatus (omitted for clarity in
The output voltage of the shunt consists of the sum of the voltage across the shunt due to the passing current, together with the voltages developed across the thermocouple pairs 17/5 and 6/18. As the distance between area 5 and point 17 (likewise, area 6 to point 18) is much smaller than the distance between area 5 and 6, the magnitude of the temperature difference is much smaller between 5 and 17 (also, 6 and 18) as compared with the likely temperature differential from 6 to 5. Correspondingly, the magnitude of generated thermoelectric voltage in pairs 5/17 and 6/18 is much smaller than the generated voltage in pair 5/6. Therefore, the sum of the thermoelectric error voltages from pairs 5/17 and 6/18 will be smaller than the error from pair 5/6 in the original prior-art arrangement in
Saying this differently, the designer of shunt 13 in
Even better performance is expected when the temperature gradient imposed across the shunt is generated in the element 2 itself, as is typically the case when current is passing through the shunt and creates heat in element 2 and, to lower degree, in sections 3 and 4. (The reader is reminded that the resistance of element 2, due to material selection by the designer, is typically much higher than the resistance of both sections 3 and 4).
Under such conditions, the thermoelectric voltages generated in pairs 5/17 and 6/18 are roughly the same in magnitude but opposite in sign; the voltages from pairs 5/17 and 6/18 will cancel each other, and the desired output of the shunt at 24 will be substantially free from errors.
Stating a set of requirement for the arrangement in
It will be appreciated that the alert and thoughtful reader may readily devise myriad obvious variations and improvements upon the invention, without departing from the invention at all. Any and all variations and improvements are intended to be encompassed within the claims which follow.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2012/057187 | 12/11/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/093714 | 6/27/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4494068 | Ley et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
5214407 | McKim, Jr. et al. | May 1993 | A |
6208151 | Aton et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7106046 | Nagano et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7591193 | Snell | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7699209 | Tei | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7982504 | Robinett | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8058871 | Guo et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8102668 | Hauenstein | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8253225 | Otremba | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8253443 | Robinett | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20090157334 | Goodnow et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20110089931 | Podlisk et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110267038 | Homma | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130009655 | Marten | Jan 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102010-0042782 | Apr 2010 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed Apr. 29, 2013 in PCT/IB2012/057187. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130328547 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61580136 | Dec 2011 | US |