Stents are tubular prostheses designed for implantation in a vessel to maintain patency of the vessel lumen. Stents are used in various vessels throughout the body, including the coronary arteries, femoral arteries, iliac arteries, renal artery, carotid artery, vascular grafts, biliary ducts, trachea, and urethra. Stents are typically implanted by means of long, flexible delivery catheters that carry the stents in a compact, collapsed shape to the treatment site and then deploy the stents into the vessel. In some applications, balloon expandable stents are used. These stents are made of a malleable metal such as stainless steel or cobalt chromium and are expanded by means of a balloon on the tip of the delivery catheter to plastically deform the stent into contact with the vessel wall. In other applications, self-expanding stents are used. These are made of a resilient material that can be collapsed into a compact shape for delivery via catheter and that will self-expand into contact with the vessel when deployed from the catheter. Materials commonly used for self-expanding stents include stainless steel and elastic or superelastic alloys such as nickel titanium (Nitinol™).
While self-expanding stents have demonstrated promise in various applications, such stents face a number of challenges. One such challenge is that in some cases the disease in a vessel may be so extensive that a stent of very long length, e.g. 30-200 mm, is called for. Currently available stents are typically less than 30 mm in length, and suffer from excessive stiffness if made longer. Such stiffness is particularly problematic in peripheral vessels such as the femoral arteries, where limb movement requires a high degree of flexibility in any stent implanted in such vessels.
To overcome the stiffness problem, the idea of deploying multiple shorter stents end-to-end has been proposed. However, this approach has suffered from several drawbacks. First, currently available delivery catheters are capable of delivering only a single stent per catheter. In order to place multiple stents, multiple catheters must be inserted, removed and exchanged, heightening risks, lengthening procedure time, raising costs, and causing excessive material waste. In addition, the deployment of multiple stents end-to-end suffers from the inability to accurately control stent placement and the spacing between stents. This results in overlap of adjacent stents and/or excessive space between stents, which is thought to lead to complications such as restenosis, the renarrowing of a vessel following stent placement. With self-expanding stents the problem is particularly acute, because as the stent is released from the catheter, its resiliency tends to cause it to eject or “watermelon seed” distally from the catheter tip by an unpredictable distance. During such deployment, the stent may displace not only axially but rotationally relative to the delivery catheter resulting in inaccurate, uncontrollable, and unpredictable stent placement.
Interleaving stents or stent segments such as those disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/738,666, filed Dec. 16, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference, present even greater challenges to conventional delivery systems. Interleaving stents have axially extending elements on each end of the stent that interleave with similar structures on an adjacent stent. Such interleaving minimizes the gap between adjacent stents and increases vessel wall coverage to ensure adequate scaffolding and minimize protrusion of plaque from the vessel wall. However, such interleaving requires that the relative rotational as well as axial positions of the adjacent stents be maintained during deployment to avoid metal overlap and excessive gaps between stents. Conventional delivery systems suffer from the inability to control both the axial and rotational positions of self-expanding stents as they are deployed. These issues are addressed, in part, in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/879,949, which was previously incorporated by reference. “Watermelon seeding” of self-expanding stents, where the resiliency of the stents causes them to eject distally from the catheter tip by an unpredictable distance, continues to be a challenge.
What are needed, therefore, are stents and stent delivery system that overcome the foregoing problems. In particular, the stents and stent delivery systems should facilitate stenting of long vascular regions of various lengths without requiring the use of multiple catheters. Such stents and delivery systems should also provide sufficient flexibility for use in peripheral vessels and other regions where long and highly flexible stents might be required. In addition, the stents and stent delivery systems should enable the delivery of multiple stents of various lengths to one or more treatment sites using a single catheter without requiring catheter exchanges. Further, the stents and stent delivery systems should facilitate accurate and repeatable control of stent placement and inter-stent spacing to enable deployment of multiple self-expanding stents end-to-end in a vessel at generally constant spacing and without overlap. In particular, the stents and delivery systems should enable the deployment of interleaving stents or stent segments with precision and control over the axial spacing of each stent or segment.
The present invention provides prostheses, prosthesis delivery systems, and methods of prosthesis deployment that enable the precise and controllable delivery of multiple prostheses using a single delivery catheter. The prostheses, delivery systems, and methods of the invention provide for the precise control of prosthesis placement so that inter-prosthesis spacing is maintained at a constant and optimum distance. In some embodiments, both axial and rotational displacement of the prostheses relative to the delivery catheter is controlled during deployment, enabling the delivery of multiple prostheses that interleave with one another without overlap. Moreover, with the use of drug-coated stents, it may be possible to place the stents apart by discrete distances, typically from one-half to one millimeter (mm), while still achieving vessel patency and hyperplasia inhibition. The prostheses, prosthesis delivery systems, and methods of the invention further enable the length of prostheses to be customized in situ to match the length of the site to be treated. The invention is particularly useful for delivery of self-expanding prostheses, but balloon expandable prostheses are also contemplated within the scope of the invention. The invention is well-suited to delivery of stents to the coronary arteries and to peripheral vessels such as the popliteal, femoral, tibial, iliac, renal, and carotid arteries. The invention is further useful for delivery of prostheses to other vessels including biliary, neurologic, urinary, reproductive, intestinal, pulmonary, and others, as well as for delivery of other types of prostheses to various anatomical regions, wherever precise control of prosthesis deployment is desirable.
In a first aspect of the invention, a catheter system for delivery of a stent to a body lumen includes a stent delivery catheter and a plurality of stent segments. The stent delivery catheter includes a sheath having a first lumen, a shaft extending through the first lumen and slidable relative to the sheath, and a stent bumper mounted to the shaft distally of the sheath and movable from a contracted shape to an expanded shape. The plurality of self-expanding stent segments is carried within the first lumen in a collapsed configuration, and the segments are adapted to resiliently expand from the collapsed configuration to an expanded configuration. The stent segments are deployable from the first lumen so as to expand into the expanded configuration, while the stent bumper is configured to engage a first stent segment during deployment thereof to maintain its position relative to an adjacent stent segment disposed proximal to the first stent segment.
In a number of embodiments, the stent bumper in the expanded shape has an outer diameter sized to contact an inner wall of the body lumen. The bumper may thus prevent distal migration of the stent segments and be stable in the vessel, without tilting, deflecting or slipping. In some embodiments, at least a portion of the stent bumper includes a lubricious surface for contacting one or more of the stent segments. For example, a proximal surface or portion of the stent bumper may have such a coating.
The bumper itself may have any of a number of suitable shapes, sizes and configurations, and may be made of any suitable material or combinations of materials. In some embodiments, for example, the stent bumper may comprise an expandable basket, a plurality of expandable blades, rods or petals, an expandable disk, a proximal portion of a nosecone at the distal end of the catheter shaft, or the like. In a preferred embodiment, the stent bumper comprises an inflatable balloon. In such embodiments, the catheter typically further includes an inflation lumen in the shaft (or elsewhere in the catheter), which is in fluid communication with the inflatable balloon. In some embodiments, the balloon is adapted to be deflated, positioned within the deployed first stent segment, and re-inflated to the expanded shape. Optionally, the balloon in the expanded shape may be adapted to further expand the deployed first stent segment. In an alternative embodiment, an elongate balloon is used, the balloon having an axial length at least as long as two stent segments. In one embodiment, for example, the axial length of the elongate balloon is between about 20 mm and about 250 mm. In such embodiments, the catheter may further include an inner sheath disposed over the balloon, with the inner sheath being retractable to expose a portion of the balloon to allow it to be inflated from the contracted shape to the expanded shape. In some embodiments, the balloon is adapted to be expanded within one or more deployed stent segments to further expand the segments.
Any suitable stents or stent segments may be used. Examples of self-expanding stents are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/879,949, which was previously incorporated by reference, but any other suitable self-expanding stents or stent segments may be substituted in various embodiment. In some embodiments, balloon expandable stents may be used. In various embodiments, the stent segments may be made of Nitinol, other superelastic alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chromium, other resilient metals, polymers or any other suitable material. Additionally, each stent segment may have any suitable length. In some embodiments, for example, each stent segment has a length of between about 3 mm and about 30 mm, and more preferably between about 4 mm and about 20 mm. Furthermore, any suitable number of stent segments may be loaded onto the catheter in various embodiments. For example, some embodiments may include between 2 and 50 segments. In some embodiments, the catheter may additionally include a pusher slidably disposed over the shaft, proximal to the stent segments, for advancing the stent segments relative to the sheath or holding the stent segments in place while the sheath is retracted.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of delivering a stent to a body lumen involves: positioning a stent delivery catheter in the body lumen, the delivery catheter carrying at least first and second stent segments; expanding a stent bumper on the delivery catheter; releasing the first stent segment from the delivery catheter into the body lumen proximal to the stent bumper, the first stent segment self-expanding into an expanded configuration in the body lumen, wherein the stent bumper engages the first stent segment during expansion thereof to maintain its position relative to the delivery catheter; and releasing the second stent segment from the delivery catheter into the body lumen adjacent to the first stent segment.
In a preferred embodiment, expanding the stent bumper involves inflating a balloon. Optionally, such a method may further include, before releasing the second stent segment: deflating the balloon; positioning the deflated balloon within the expanded first stent segment; and inflating the balloon, wherein the balloon engages the second stent segment during expansion thereof to maintain its position relative to the delivery catheter and the first segment. In some embodiments, inflating the balloon within the first segment further expands the first segment. The method may further involve: deflating the balloon; positioning the deflated balloon within the expanded second stent segment; and inflating the balloon, wherein the balloon engages a third stent segment during expansion thereof to maintain its position relative to the delivery catheter and the first and second segments. These steps of deflating, positioning and inflating may be repeated as many times as desired to deploy a desired number of stent segments.
In an alternative embodiment, before expanding the balloon, a portion of the balloon is exposed from the distal end of an inner sheath that is disposed over the balloon. Such a method may optionally further involve, before releasing the second stent segment: exposing an additional portion of the balloon from the distal end of the inner sheath, the additional portion disposed within the expanded first stent segment; and inflating the balloon, wherein the balloon engages the second stent segment during expansion thereof to maintain its position relative to the delivery catheter and the first segment. In some embodiments, inflating the additional portion of the balloon further expands the expanded first stent segment.
Rather than inflating a balloon, in alternative embodiments expanding the stent bumper involves deploying one or more other structures on the catheter device. In one embodiment, for example, a basket of resilient polymer or metal mesh is expanded. In some embodiments, expanding the stent bumper involves releasing one or more shape-memory members from constraint. For example, the shape-memory member(s) may include blades, rods, petals, rings or the like, made of metal, polymer or other resilient material.
The stents may be released from the delivery catheter via any suitable means. In one embodiment, for example, releasing each stent segment involves maintaining an axial position of the stent segments relative to the delivery catheter using a pusher member of the catheter and retracting an outer sheath disposed over the stent segments. Alternatively, releasing each stent segment may involve maintaining an axial position of an outer sheath disposed over the stent segments relative to the delivery catheter and advancing the stent segments out of a distal end of the sheath using a pusher member of the catheter.
Further aspects of the nature and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the drawings.
Referring to
Outer shaft 24 has a distal extremity 46 defining a first lumen 48. A plurality of stents 50 (or stent segments) are disposed in a collapsed configuration within first lumen 48. Stents 50 are preferably composed of a resilient material such as stainless steel or Nitinol so as to self-expand from the collapsed configuration to a radially expanded configuration when deployed from first lumen 48. While stents 50 as illustrated have a wave-like or undulating pattern in a plurality of interconnected circumferential members, the pattern illustrated is merely exemplary and the stents of the invention may have any of a variety of strut shapes, patterns, and geometries. From 2 up to 10 or more stents may be carried by outer shaft 24. Optionally, a valve member 49 is mounted within first lumen 48 to facilitate separating those stents 50 to be deployed from those to remain within outer shaft 24, as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/412,714, filed Apr. 10, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Coupled with inner shaft 28 is an expandable stent bumper 60. In various embodiments, stent bumper 60 may comprise an expandable wire or mesh basket, an expandable ring, shape-memory members such as petals, blades, prongs or other protrusions, or any of a number of other configurations. In a preferred embodiment, as shown, stent bumper 60 is an inflatable balloon. In some embodiments, stent bumper 60 is inflatable via an inflation lumen disposed within inner shaft 28. Such an inflation lumen may alternatively be disposed on an outer surface of inner lumen 28 or the like. In some embodiments, stent bumper 60 may be attached to, or a proximal extension of, a nosecone 36 of delivery catheter 20. When expanded, stent bumper 60 helps control the deployment of stents 50. For example, if stent bumper 60 is expanded and a stent 50′ is deployed out of the distal end of catheter body 46, stent bumper 60 has a diameter large enough, in its expanded configuration, to stop deployed stent 50′ from moving distally, thus preventing “watermelon seeding” of stent 50′. The operation of stent bumper 60 will be described further below with reference to subsequent drawing figures.
Handle assembly 21 has a rotatable retraction knob 52 coupled to a shaft housing 53, to which outer shaft 24 is fixed. By rotating retraction knob 52, outer shaft 24 may be retracted proximally relative to pusher 26 and inner shaft 28. A switch 56 engages and disengages pusher 26 with outer shaft 28, so that pusher 26 either moves with outer shaft 24 or remains stationary as outer shaft 24 is retracted. Indicia 58 on shaft housing 53 indicate the extent of retraction of outer shaft 28 by distance, number of stents, or other suitable measure. Other aspects of handle assembly 21 are described in co-pending application Ser. No. 10/746,466, filed Dec. 23, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Except as stated otherwise, any of the embodiments of the stent delivery catheter described below may incorporate the features, and be otherwise constructed as, just described.
With reference now to
As outer shaft 184 is retracted to deploy one or more stents 182, at least a distal ring 192′ is configured to expand into engagement with stent bumper 160 before the entire length of stent 182 is deployed from outer shaft 184 (
Rings 192 are preferably formed from a common piece of material and are integrally interconnected at joints 193, making joints 193 relatively rigid. In this embodiment, the majority of flexibility between rings 192 is provided by struts 191 rather than by joints 193. Alternatively, joints 193 may comprise welded connections between rings 192 which are also fairly rigid. As a further alternative, joints 193 may comprise hinge or spring structures to allow greater deflection between adjacent rings 192.
In various alternative embodiments, any of a number of alternative stents with alternative designs, shapes, sizes, materials and/or the like may be used. For example, a number of exemplary self-expanding stents that may be used with delivery catheter 180 are described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/879,949 and 10/738,666, which were previously incorporated by reference. Stents 192 may be made of any suitable material, such as but not limited to Nitinol™, a superelastic alloy, stainless steel, cobalt chromium, other resilient metals, resilient polymers or the like. In some embodiments, stent 192 may be balloon expandable, rather than self-expanding, although this description focuses on the preferred self-expanding embodiments.
Various alternative types of interconnecting structures between adjacent stents and between the stents and the pusher shaft are also possible within the scope of the invention, including those described in co-pending application Ser. No. 10/738,666, previously incorporated by reference. Such interconnecting structures may also be breakable or frangible to facilitate separation as the stent expands. In addition, a mechanism such as an expandable balloon or cutting device may be disposed at the distal end of delivery catheter 180 to assist in separating stents 192 upon deployment. Further, the interconnections between stents may be different than the interconnection between the proximal-most stent and the pusher shaft. For example, the pusher shaft may have hooks, magnets, or other mechanisms suitable for releasably holding and maintaining traction on the proximal end of a stent until it is deployed.
Referring to
In
As shown in
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring now to
In another embodiment, and with reference now to
Referring now to
While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, improvements and additions are possible without departing from the scope thereof, which is defined by the claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/879,949, filed Jun. 28, 2004, which is hereby incorporated fully by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4468224 | Enzmann et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4512338 | Balko et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4564014 | Fogarty et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4681110 | Wiktor | Jul 1987 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4762129 | Bonzel | Aug 1988 | A |
4775337 | Van Wagener et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4988356 | Crittenden et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994066 | Voss | Feb 1991 | A |
4994069 | Ritchart et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5013318 | Spranza, III | May 1991 | A |
5040548 | Yock | Aug 1991 | A |
5092877 | Pinchuk | Mar 1992 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5104404 | Wolff | Apr 1992 | A |
5135535 | Kramer | Aug 1992 | A |
5195984 | Schatz | Mar 1993 | A |
5217495 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226913 | Pinchuk | Jul 1993 | A |
5246421 | Saab | Sep 1993 | A |
5273536 | Savas | Dec 1993 | A |
5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
5300085 | Yock | Apr 1994 | A |
5312415 | Palermo | May 1994 | A |
5334187 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5421955 | Lau et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5458615 | Klemm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5478349 | Nicholas | Dec 1995 | A |
5490837 | Blaeser et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496346 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501227 | Yock | Mar 1996 | A |
5507768 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507771 | Gianturco | Apr 1996 | A |
5514093 | Ellis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514154 | Lau et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527354 | Fontaine et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5549551 | Peacock, III et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549563 | Kronner | Aug 1996 | A |
5549635 | Solar | Aug 1996 | A |
5554181 | Das | Sep 1996 | A |
5562725 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571086 | Kaplan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593412 | Martinez et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607444 | Lam | Mar 1997 | A |
5607463 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628775 | Jackson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634928 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5662675 | Polanskyj Stockert et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676654 | Ellis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683451 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697948 | Marin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702418 | Ravenscroft | Dec 1997 | A |
5709701 | Parodi | Jan 1998 | A |
5722669 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5723003 | Winston et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735869 | Fernandez-Aceytuno | Apr 1998 | A |
5749848 | Jang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
5749921 | Lenker et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755772 | Evans et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755776 | Al-Saadon | May 1998 | A |
5755781 | Jayaraman | May 1998 | A |
5769882 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772669 | Vrba | Jun 1998 | A |
5776141 | Klein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800519 | Sandock | Sep 1998 | A |
5807398 | Shaknovich | Sep 1998 | A |
5824040 | Cox et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833694 | Poncet | Nov 1998 | A |
5836964 | Richter et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843092 | Heller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858556 | Eckert et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870381 | Kawasaki et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879370 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891190 | Boneau | Apr 1999 | A |
5895398 | Wensel et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899935 | Ding | May 1999 | A |
5902332 | Schatz | May 1999 | A |
5919175 | Sirhan | Jul 1999 | A |
5922020 | Klein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961536 | Mickley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968069 | Dusbabek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976107 | Mertens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976155 | Foreman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980484 | Ressemann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980486 | Enger | Nov 1999 | A |
5980514 | Kupiecki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980552 | Pinchasik et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984957 | Laptewicz, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007517 | Anderson | Dec 1999 | A |
6022359 | Frantzen | Feb 2000 | A |
6033434 | Borghi | Mar 2000 | A |
6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042589 | Marianne | Mar 2000 | A |
6056722 | Jayaraman | May 2000 | A |
6066155 | Amann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068655 | Seguin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090063 | Makower et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090136 | McDonald et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102942 | Ahari | Aug 2000 | A |
6106530 | Harada | Aug 2000 | A |
RE36857 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2000 | E |
6120522 | Vrba et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123712 | Di Caprio et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123723 | Konya et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126685 | Lenker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129756 | Kugler | Oct 2000 | A |
6143016 | Bleam et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165167 | Delaloye | Dec 2000 | A |
6179878 | Duering | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187034 | Frantzen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190402 | Horton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196995 | Fagan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200337 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241691 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251132 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251134 | Alt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254612 | Hieshima | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254628 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258117 | Camrud et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267783 | Letendre et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273895 | Pinchuk et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312458 | Golds | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315794 | Richter | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319277 | Rudnick et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325823 | Horzewski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6357104 | Myers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375676 | Cox | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383171 | Gifford et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6419693 | Fariabi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451025 | Jervis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451050 | Rudakov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6468298 | Pelton | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468299 | Stack et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6485510 | Camrud et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488694 | Lau et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6488702 | Besselink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511468 | Cragg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520987 | Plante | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527789 | Lau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6527799 | Shanley | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6555157 | Hossainy | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575993 | Yock | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582394 | Reiss et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6529549 | Gerdts et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599296 | Gillick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6602282 | Yan | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605062 | Hurley et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6645547 | Shekalim et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656212 | Ravenscroft et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666883 | Seguin et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6679909 | McIntosh et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6692465 | Kramer | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702843 | Brown et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712827 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712845 | Hossainy | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723071 | Gerdts et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6743251 | Eder | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6800065 | Duane et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6849084 | Rabkin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20010020154 | Bigus et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010020181 | Layne | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010044595 | Reydel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020037358 | Barry et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020107560 | Richter | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138132 | Brown | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151955 | Tran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156496 | Chermoni | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177890 | Lenker | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188343 | Mathis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188347 | Mathis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193873 | Brucker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045923 | Bashiri et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093143 | Zhao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097169 | Brucker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114912 | Sequin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114919 | McQuiston et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114922 | Iwasaka et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125791 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135266 | Chew et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139796 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139797 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030176909 | Kusleika | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199821 | Gerdts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225446 | Hartley | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040087965 | Levine et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093061 | Acosta et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093067 | Israel | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098081 | Landreville et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040186551 | Kao et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215165 | Coyle et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215312 | Andreas | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249435 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010276 | Acosta et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038505 | Shuize et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050133164 | Andreas et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149159 | Andreas et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050288763 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060229700 | Acosta et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282147 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282150 | Olson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203945 | Dec 1986 | EP |
274129 | Jul 1988 | EP |
282143 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 505 686 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 533 960 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 596 145 | May 1997 | EP |
947180 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1266638 | Oct 2005 | EP |
WO 9633677 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 9746174 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9748351 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9901087 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 0015151 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0032136 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0041649 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0072780 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0050116 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0062708 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0072780 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0170297 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0191918 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03022178 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03047651 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03051425 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 2004017865 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043299 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043301 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043510 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004052237 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050288763 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10879949 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 10944282 | US |