The claimed invention relates generally to the field of tool sharpeners and more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to an apparatus and method for sharpening a cutting tool.
Cutting tools are often provided with a laterally extending cutting (chisel-type) edge. This cutting edge is useful, for example, in planing a surface such as a wooden board, or cutting a brick or other member through the application of a sharp impulse to the tool opposite the cutting edge.
The cutting edge is often defined at the intersection of a back surface and leading surface (bevel) of the tool. The angle between the respective back and bevel surfaces can vary, with a commonly used angle being on the order of about 25 degrees.
The laterally extending cutting edge can be substantially linear (straight), or can be curvilinear (rounded). These latter tools are particularly useful as woodworking and carving tools, which come in a large number of shapes and sizes.
While such tools have found great popularity and utility in a variety of applications, one problem that often arises is that, after repeated use, the cutting edge can become dull and/or damaged. It is therefore often desirable to periodically sharpen the tool in an attempt to provide a uniform, sharp and well defined cutting edge for the tool.
A variety of sharpening methodologies and devices has been proposed in the art to sharpen such tools. While operable, a number of limitations have been found with these prior art approaches, including the generation of relatively large burrs at the cutting edge, the propensity to overheat the tool during the sharpening operation, and the inability to provide a precisely formed cutting edge.
There accordingly remains a continual need for improvements in the art to permit a user to quickly and reliably sharpen cutting tools. It is to these and other improvements that preferred embodiments of the present invention are generally directed.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are generally related to a tool sharpening apparatus suitable for sharpening a number of different types of cutting tools.
In accordance with some preferred embodiments, a rotational first abrasive surface is provided adjacent a stationary second abrasive surface. The respective surfaces are configured for sliding contacting engagement of a back surface of a tool along the second abrasive surface to bring a distal surface of the tool into a limit stop abutment against the first abrasive member and sharpen a cutting edge of the tool between the back and distal surfaces. Without limitation, the tool can be characterized as a straight or angled chisel.
The first and second abrasive surfaces are preferably arranged to form a wedge-shaped port configured to insertingly receive the tool. An adjustment mechanism is preferably used to adjust an intervening angle between the first and second abrasive surfaces. The first abrasive surface is preferably characterized as an abrasive surface of a rotatable disc, and the second abrasive surface is preferably characterized as an abrasive surface of a ramp structure supported adjacent the disc.
In accordance with other preferred embodiments, the apparatus generally comprises a rotatable abrasive surface, and a tool support structure which contactingly supports a body portion of a tool while a cutting surface of the tool is presented against the abrasive surface during a sharpening operation. A cooling mechanism operates to actively draw heat generated during the sharpening operation through the body portion and the tool support to reduce a temperature of said tool.
Preferably, the cooling mechanism uses a cooling fluid which passes adjacent the tool support structure to remove heat therefrom. In some embodiments, the tool support structure is characterized as a heat sink with a base support and a plurality of cooling fins which extend from the base support, and the cooling mechanism comprises an impeller which directs ambient air across said cooling fins.
Alternatively, the cooling mechanism further comprises a cooling fluid source which circulates the cooling fluid through a closed conduit path to a heat exchanger in contact with the tool support structure. In other embodiments, the cooling mechanism comprises a thermo-electric cooler.
Other preferred embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to a rotatable abrasive disc comprising a central mounting aperture and at least one radially extending inspection aperture with an interior sidewall which extends from an abrasive lower surface to an opposing upper surface. The sidewall preferably comprises interior upper and lower leading edges and interior upper and lower trailing edges with respect to a direction of disc rotation, wherein a maximum distance between the upper leading edge and the upper trailing edge is substantially greater than a maximum distance between the lower leading edge and the lower trailing edge.
Preferably, the disc comprises a plurality of radially extending inspection apertures in a substantially uniform spaced apart relation around the disc. A light source is preferably locatable adjacent the upper surface to facilitate observation of a sharpening operation upon a cutting tool by a user upon the abrasive lower surface through the plurality of radially extending inspection apertures during disc rotation.
The lower trailing edge preferably has a length as measured along the direction of disc rotation that is substantially greater than a corresponding length of the lower leading edge to provide a landing contact zone for a tool during a sharpening operation in which the tool is brought into contacting engagement with the lower abrasive surface.
The disc further preferably comprises an outer annular disc portion through which the inspection aperture extends, wherein the disc comprises an inner annular disc portion adjacent a central axis of the disc, and a support vane which connects the inner and outer annular disc portions and which establishes an air current path through a gap between the inner and outer annular disc portions.
In accordance with yet other preferred embodiments, an apparatus is provided comprising a motor configured to rotate a drive shaft about a central axis, and an abrasive member characterized as a cylindrical drum with an outermost abrasive surface rotated by the drive shaft about the central axis. A support plate is placed substantially normal to the central axis which provides a support surface adjacent to and which surrounds a first end of the abrasive member.
At least one support leg preferably extends from the support plate to a top cover member of a tool sharpening assembly. An adjustment screw preferably extends through the support plate and into the support leg to adjust a planar orientation level of the support plate.
Still further preferred embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to a grinding wheel comprising a substrate with at least one disc shaped surface and a circumferentially extending edge surface. A first abrasive layer is affixed to the at least one disc shaped surface, and a second abrasive layer is wrapped along the circumferentially extending edge surface.
Preferably, the first and second abrasive layers are each characterized as sandpaper of selected grit and an adhesive backing so that said layers are adhered to the respective disc shaped and circumferentially extending edge surfaces. In some embodiments, the substrate is formed of tempered glass or metal. Alternatively or additionally, the substrate comprises a central hub, at least one spoke support radially extending from the hub, and an annular outer rim.
The substrate further preferably comprises at least one annular ring of abrasive material formed thereon at a junction between the disc shaped surface and the circumferentially extending edge surface, and the second abrasive layer is placed adjacent said at least one annular ring of abrasive material.
Various other features and advantages of the preferred embodiments of the present invention will be apparent from a review of the following detailed discussion and the associated drawings.
As set forth below, preferred embodiments of the present invention are generally directed to an apparatus for sharpening a cutting tool. The apparatus is exemplified by a tool sharpening assembly 100, as shown in
Overview
Major components of the assembly 100 include a rigid housing formed from a base member 102, top member 104 and circumferentially arrayed sidewall members 106. Preferably, the base member 102 is formed of injection molded, tool grade plastic, the top member 104 is cast aluminum and the sidewall members 106 are formed of aluminum sheeting. A variety of other materials and shapes can be used as desired, however.
An abrasive disc 108 is rotated during operation of the assembly 100 at a suitable speed, such as on the order of about 580 revolutions per minute (rpm). As explained below, the disc 108 preferably comprises a tempered glass disc, preferably on the order of about six (6) inches (150 millimeters, mm) in diameter and about ⅜ inch (10 mm) in thickness. Sheets of coated abrasive are preferably attached to the upper and lower surfaces of the disc, and a threaded fastener 110 is inserted through a central aperture to secure the disc to an underlying spindle (not shown).
Preferably, the sheets of coated abrasive each comprise a substrate backing layer such as paper, fiber, cloth, film, screen, etc. A layer of adhesive is applied to one side of the backing layer, and a layer of abrasive particles of selected grit is affixed to the other side of the backing layer. The layer of adhesive serves to affix the sheet to the disc 108, thereby presenting the outwardly extending abrasive layer for use during the sharpening operation. In some preferred embodiments, the sheets of coated abrasive can be characterized as sheets of sandpaper with adhesive backing.
A first sharpening port is generally denoted at 112. The sharpening port 112, also referred to herein as a “wedge shaped port,” is preferably used to provide sharpening of various types of cutting tools in a fast and efficient manner as explained below. A second sharpening port is generally denoted at 114, and this second port 114 is used to sharpen other types of cutting tools, also in a manner to be discussed below.
Other features of interest shown in
The motor is preferably supported by threaded standoffs 132 which extend through and down from the top member 104 (
Sharpening Using the Wedge-Shaped Port
As further shown in
The members 156, 158 present corresponding first and second abrasive surfaces 160, 162 in facing relation as shown. In a preferred embodiment the first and second abrasive members 156, 158 each comprise coated abrasives or similar removeable and replaceable elements of desired grit levels. Sharpening stones, grinding wheels, sanding belts, etc. can alternatively be utilized as desired.
Generally, during a sharpening operation the tool 140 is preferably inserted into the port 112 so that the back surface 142 is brought into contact with the second abrasive surface 162. Preferably, this insertion is performed manually by user manipulation of the handle 154, although in other embodiments automated manipulation of the tool 140 can be provided using suitable robotic or other mechanisms. A retention member (not shown) such as a spring clip or a magnet can be used as desired to enhance the abutting contact of the back surface 142 against the second abrasive surface 162.
The tool 140 is next advanced so that the back surface 142 slidingly engages the second abrasive surface 162. This provides a honing action upon the back surface 142 so that, depending on the level of abrasiveness of the surface 162 and the state of flatness of the back surface 142, some amount of swarf (grinding debris such as fine chips or shavings) may be removed from the tool 140. A material removal system (not shown) can be provided to remove this swarf, such as through the use of a vacuum port attachment.
The forward advancement of the tool 140 continues until the bevel surface 144 is brought into contact with the moving first abrasive surface 160. Preferably, the tool 140 is held in contact against the first abrasive surface 160 at this point for a relatively short amount of time and with a relatively moderate amount of inwardly directed force. It is contemplated that during this contact a small amount of material will be removed from the distal end of the tool (i.e., the bevel surface 144 will be ground upon by the first abrasive surface).
This removed material may be exhibited as swarf, as discussed above. Alternatively or additionally, a small amount of burring (elongation) of material displaced by the first abrasive surface 160 may extend along the cutting edge 146 at this point, as generally represented by burr 164 in
The tool 140 is next retracted by sliding engagement along the second abrasive surface 162, preferably in an opposite direction as before so that the tool 140 is pulled away from the first abrasive member 156. This will again preferably provide a honing action upon the back surface 142 and, additionally, will preferably result in the removal of any such burred material obtained during the previous step, as generally represented in
It is contemplated that in most sharpening operations multiple cycles will be used in immediate succession. The number of cycles will depend on several factors including the original state of the tool 140, but an exemplary number may be on the order of 5-20 cycles. It may be preferable to first “flatten the back” of the tool 140 prior to these sharpening cycles by placing the back surface 142 of the tool 140 onto a third abrasive member 166 on the top surface of the rotating disc 108 (
Depending on the quality of the steel or other material of which the tool 140 is formed, as well as the respective grit levels of the various abrasive surfaces, levels of sharpness approaching “razor” or so-called “scary” sharpness can be readily and repeatably obtained. Any number of different grit sequences can be applied; in a preferred embodiment, the first abrasive member 156 has a grit on the order of 80-100, the second abrasive member 158 has a grit of 200-400, and a third abrasive member on the top surface of the disc 108 (shown at 166 in
In another preferred embodiment, multiple discs similar to 108 are provided with opposing surface grits that step up from progressively coarser to finer levels (e.g., 80, 220, 400, 1200, etc.). An initially dull or damaged tool is subjected to the coarsest grit to achieve an initial sharpening. The discs are then turned over and/or replaced to provide a sequence of increasingly finer grits against which the bevel surface 144 is ground during subsequent cycles. In this way, substantially any tool can be brought to “razor” like sharpness in a matter of a few minutes.
An advantage of this sharpening methodology is that during any particular cycle, the amount of material that is removed and/or displaced in the form of a distally extending burr will usually tend to be relatively small, particularly as compared to various prior art approaches. A burr such as 164 obtained from the contact of the bevel surface 144 with the first abrasive member 156 will often be relatively small and stiff, facilitating easy removal during the subsequent retraction of the tool 140. This advantageously prevents or reduces the propensity for a relatively large burr of material to accumulate on the tool, which would require more aggressive removal efforts and less than optimal sharpening results.
The support base 168 is best viewed in
In some preferred embodiments, the second abrasive member 158 is an adhesive sheet of sandpaper or similar abrasive material which is adhered to the heat sink assembly 170. In alternative preferred embodiments, the second abrasive member 158 comprises a diamond coating or similar hardened texturing that is supplied to the top surface of the heat sink.
In the exemplary environment of the tool sharpening assembly 100, the bevel angle for the port 112 is preferably adjustable. More specifically, the bevel angle selection lever 172 includes a user actuated handle 184 (
The fence assembly 174 is substantially u-shaped with a cantilevered alignment arm 192 which extends adjacent the abrasive member 158 of the heat sink assembly 170. The arm 192 preferably serves as a guide surface to support a side of the tool 140 during the aforedescribed sharpening cycles. The arm 192 is laterally moved across the surface of member 158 through user activation of a knob 194 of the worm gear assembly 176. More specifically, as shown in
The arm 192 is preferably shown to include a number of downwardly projecting teeth 202 which pass between corresponding upwardly projecting teeth 204 of the heat sink assembly 170. In this way, the arm 192 can be advanced wholly beyond the abrasive surface 158 when, for example, a tool is presented for sharpening that has a width substantially equal to the width of the abrasive surface 158 (preferably on the order of about 2½ inches).
When the arm 192 is in use, the user has the option of placing the tool 140 to either the right or the left of the arm 192, as desired. When the tool 140 is to the left of the arm 192, the user can utilize the arm 192 and the base support teeth 204 to form opposing guide surfaces during the longitudinally directed honing action of the tool 140 against the abrasive member 158. Conversely, when the tool 140 is to the right of the arm 192, the user can utilize the arm 192 and a guide surface 206 of the support base 168.
It is recommended that tools of relatively smaller width (e.g., 1 inch or less in width) are preferably sharpened to the left of the fence assembly 174 (an “inboard position”), and tools of relatively larger width (e.g., greater than 1 inch in width) are preferably sharpened to the right of the fence assembly 174 (an “outboard position). This is because the instantaneous linear velocity of the disc 108 at the point of contact for the tool will generally be lower at the inboard position as compared to the outboard position, so that greater heating of the tool may be experienced at the outboard position as compared to the inboard position. Grinding a smaller tool (with smaller overall mass) at the inboard position thus advantageously reduces a likelihood that the tool will overheat and suffer annealing (undesired recrystallization of the tool member) or other damage.
The skew adjustment member 178 generally operates to allow the user to adjust skew, or lateral (left-to-right) leveling, of the base support 168. As shown in
A pin 214 extends from the support base 168 opposite the pin 180 (see
The aperture 210 is offset from the center of the body portion 208 by a relatively small distance (e.g., 0.050 inches). This eccentricity induces relative up or down movement of the right side support base 168 as the handle is raised or lowered.
More particularly, as shown by
It can be seen that the wedge-shaped port 112 can be used to sharpen tools such as 230, so long as the tool 230 is presented by the user at an angle such that the cutting surface 232 is substantially aligned with the disc 108. However, in a preferred embodiment such tools are sharpened using an angled tool support assembly 234 as shown in
The angled tool support assembly 234 preferably comprises a base 236 with engagement legs 238. The legs 238 engage a corresponding pair of t-slots 240 of the tool support assembly 100 in the area proximate the sharpening port 114, as shown in
An angular adjustment assembly 250 is also affixed to the base 236, and operates to adjust an elevational (front-to-back) angle of the tool support member 234. A central shaft 252 is rotated by a user activated knob 254 to bring a cam 256 into displacing contact with a corresponding camming surface 258 of the support member 242. Thus, as the knob 254 is rotated, the front-to-back elevational orientation of the surfaces 246, 248 is controllably adjusted to match a suitable angle for the tool 230. A biasing member (not shown) is preferably used to apply an adequate biasing force upon the tool support member 242 so that the camming surface 258 remains urged against the cam 256.
The tool support assembly 234 thus provides another wedge-shaped sharpening port similar to the sharpening port 112. If the angle of the cutting surface 232 of the tool 230 slopes down to the left (as depicted in
For both
It is contemplated that in most cases the center of gravity for the tool 260 will likely be located near or beyond the outermost edge of the second abrasive surface 262. When the sharpener 100 is generally oriented as shown in
More particularly, the downwardly directed force upon the distal end of the tool 260, represented by arrow 266, will generally urge the proximal end of the tool into contact with the first abrasive surface 262, as indicated by force arrow 268. The user can thus easily support the tool 260 by its handle and apply a relatively light upward force during the sharpening process to overcome the effects of gravity. This has been generally found to be a natural and easily controlled manipulation for most users.
Another advantage of underside grinding as generally set forth by the sharpening at ports 112, 114 can be appreciated from a review of
From these figures it will be noted that irrespective of the overall thicknesses of the respective discs 270 and 290, and irrespective of particular variations between thicknesses of the sheets of coated adhesive 276 and 296, the elevation at which the underlying abrasive surfaces 278, 298 will preferably in all cases be nominally the same (i.e., at reference elevation 280). This ensures that the geometries established by the sharpening port will not be substantially changed with respect to the location of the first abrasive surface, which can be particularly advantageous when different grits of abrasive are sequentially used during the sharpening operation.
The wedge shaped port sharpening discussed herein is not necessarily limited to underside grinding. As shown in
Sharpening operations using the respective ports 300, 310 are preferably carried out as described above. It will be noted that, depending on the relative orientations of the ports 300, 310, the respective gravitational force vectors may be the same as, or different from, the orientations discussed in
It will be now appreciated that the various alternative wedge shaped port sharpening operations set forth above provide a number of advantages over prior art sharpening techniques. The wedge shaped port provides superior sharpening results in a fast and easily controlled manner. The sharpening forces on the bevel portion of the tool are opposed by the second abrasive surface, which enhances the ability to control presentation of the tool against the first abrasive surface.
The cyclical presentation of the tool against the respective first and second abrasive surfaces generally operates to provide reduced burr generation, and what burrs are generated are easily removed during the honing strokes. The bevel angle is set simply by the relative angle between the first and second abrasive surfaces, and is not substantially affected by variations in either abrasive layer or disc thickness, leading to increased repeatability.
Another particularly useful advantage is the elimination of the need to attach clamps or other fixturing to each tool to be sharpened; the sharpener 100 itself provides the guide surfaces to allow the user to insert and sharpen each tool. Indeed, once the bevel angle, fence location and skew alignment are set, this same setup can easily be used to handle the sharpening of multiple tools in quick succession.
Finally, the sharpener 100 is preferably configured as described herein so that the various ports can be positioned in a user friendly and ergonomic position. The tool can be held and manipulated in a way that is comfortable and easily controlled by the user. And at least with regard to the underside grinding of ports 112 and 114, gravity helps guide the cutting edge into the port and against the first abrasive surface.
Active Cooling of the Tool
Those skilled in the art will generally recognize the importance of controlling the amount of heat generated by and accumulated in a tool during sharpening. The interaction between a tool and an abrasive surface can generate significant amounts of heat that, if not adequately controlled, can lead to overheating and irreparable damage to the tool material.
There have been a number of approaches developed in the art to address this problem. Some prior art approaches utilize liquid or flood type coolant systems to bathe the tool and/or the abrasive surface during the sharpening operation. Such approaches are sometimes referred to as “wet sharpening.” While such approaches have been found generally operable in reducing overheating, many users find the setup time, maintenance and cleanup required to be undesirable.
Other prior art approaches do not incorporate a liquid coolant, but instead rely on slow material removal rates and operator skill to limit overheating of the tool. These prior “dry” systems do not employ any means of removing excess heat from the tool other than the inherent losses do to natural convection and absorption.
By contrast, preferred embodiments of the present invention generally provide active cooling of the tool. The temperature of the tool is actively regulated without the use of a liquid coolant applied to either the abrasive or the tool. The previously discussed sharpening cycle further limit the amount of frictional heating by providing intermittent contact with the first abrasive surface. Additionally, the speed reduction employed in the motor drive assembly 122 limits the frictional heat generated.
As shown in
It will be noted that the heat transfer path in this case passes through the abrasive member 158 of the heat sink assembly 170. When the abrasive surface 158 is characterized as a layer of coated abrasive, it will be appreciated that the coated abrasive will preferably comprise relatively thin layers of adhesive, backing (fibers, film, etc.), abrasive, and a bonding agent. It will be recognized that each layer may conduct heat at a different rate (thermal conductivity) than the heat sink material. Examples of various materials and exemplary corresponding thermal conductivity (W/m ° K) used in these layers include: aluminum (250), silicon carbide (120), aluminum oxide (35), zirconium oxide (2), paper (0.05), polyethylene (0.5), common adhesives (3).
It will further be recognized that common abrasives can exceed the thermal conductivity of carbon steel (54) from which the tool is generally constructed. It has been found that the relative thickness of each of these materials can be adjusted to provide a sufficient rate to conduct heat away from the tool and prevent overheating and damage.
On the other hand, if the abrasive surface is texturized and/or forms a portion of the underlying heat sink material, thermal conductivity can be increased significantly. Diamond is the preferred abrasive for high heat with a thermal conductivity up to 5 times higher that copper at 2000 W/m ° K.
In an alternative preferred embodiment, as shown in
As before, heat generated by the sharpening process is transferred from the tool 140 to a generalized tool support structure 328 (e.g., the heat sink assembly 170) and then to the exchanger 326 so that the cooling fluid serves to sink the generated heat. Although not shown, it will be appreciated that in further preferred embodiments the warmed fluid exiting the exchanger 326 can be cooled by the source 322. While the tool support structure 328 preferably comprises an abrasive surface, such is not necessarily required.
The port 334 is coupleable to a remote pressure source (such as vacuum) and airflow is generated as previously depicted in
Slotted Abrasive Disc
The sharpening port 112 is particularly suited to sharpening tools with a cutting edge that extends substantially linearly across the width of the tool. However, other types of cutting tools can have substantially curvilinearly extending cutting edges, such as generally represented by
More particularly,
Such tools are preferably sharpened using the aforementioned port 114 of the tool sharpening assembly 100, as set forth in
As shown in
Apertures (not separately designated) are formed in the abrasive layer 374 to correspond to the apertures 372, so that a user can see through the disc 364 in the vicinity of the apertures 372.
During rotation of the disc 364 at high speed, a strobe effect is generated which enables the user to observe the grinding operation from above. More specifically, the head of the user is preferably positioned above and over the disc 364 so that the user can observe and control the manipulation of the tool 350, 366 against the abrasive surface 374 from beneath. By holding the tool by the handle, the user can align, pivot and/or rotate the tool continuously along various axes to present the full extent of the cutting edge against the disc 364 to effect the desired sharpening.
As further shown in
The support vanes 382 preferably operate to generate airflow currents (denoted by arrows 384) which flow upwardly through gaps 386 between the inner and outer disc portions 376, 378. These airflow currents advantageously serve to provide cooling to the sharpened tool. While the vanes 382 are shown to linearly extend from the center of the disc 364, other configurations, including swept or curved vanes, can readily be employed. The disc 364 is preferably formed of injection molded plastic, although other configurations and constructions can be employed as desired.
As further shown in
This wider opening at the upper portion of the aperture 372 as compared to the lower portion advantageously increases the effective amount of light transmission and reflection through the aperture 372 from the source 368, to the tool 366, and back to the users' eyes. At least the sidewalls 390 and top surface 392 are preferably black or other dark color to further improve light transmission and reflection through the apertures 372.
The lower trailing edge 402 is preferably substantially longer in comparison to the lower leading edge 398, as set forth in
With respect to the direction of disc rotation, the separation distance between the upper leading and trailing edges 396, 400 at the upper mouth of the aperture 372 is preferably about 0.272 inches, and the separation distance between the lower leading and trailing edges 396, 400 at the lower mouth of the aperture 372 is preferably about 0.185 inches. Opposing interior medial surfaces are denoted in
The upper leading and trailing edges 396, 400 preferably meet the respective medial surfaces 401, 403 in the lower half of the aperture 372; that is, the edges 396, 400 extend downwardly beyond a centerline 405 with respect to an overall thickness of the disc 364. The surfaces 396, 400 further are preferably disposed at an angle of about 60 degrees, although other values can be used as desired.
Secondary Grinding Surfaces
The solid, two sided abrasive disc 108 and the slotted disc 364 can be respectively selected and installed onto the assembly 100 to provide a number of sharpening configurations for different types of tools. Additional grinding members can be affixed to the assembly 100 as well.
Tool Support Attachments
A variety of exemplary tool support attachments are shown in
In this way, the user can support the tool or other workpiece on the plate 574 to provide abrasion along a direction substantially normal to the plate. For example, the configuration of the assembly 100 in
Modular Grinding Wheels
As discussed above, the disc 108 is preferably provided with a tempered glass disc substrate to which layers of coated abrasive, such as adhesive backed sandpaper of selected grit, are applied (e.g., layers 156 and 166 shown in
As shown in
An edge abrasive member 592 is further preferably affixed to a circumferentially extending outer surface 594 of the substrate 582 by wrapping the edge member 592 as shown. Mating edges 596, 598 are preferably angled to provide a closely spaced, angled seam joint (
An advantage of the disc 580 is that any of the respective surfaces can be utilized as a grinding surface in substantially any existing grinding wheel type application. Moreover, unlike prior art grinding wheels which can be brittle or have localized areas of wear over time, the disc 580 is significantly stronger and can be refurbished simply by replacing the abrasive layers with new layers as needed.
An alternative abrasive disc is shown at 600 in
An adhesive layer 612 is preferably affixed to the planar surface 610, and an edge adhesive layer 614 is affixed to a circumferentially extending outer surface 616 of the rim 608. Annular texturized rings 618, 620 are preferably provisioned at the upper and lower extends of the rim 608. These texturized rings can be provided in any suitable manner, such as through a diamond coating process.
The rings 618, 620 are preferably sized to substantially match the thicknesses of the adhesive layers 612, 614 so that a substantially uniform texture thickness is supplied along the various disc surfaces. An advantage of this configuration is that the abrasive disc 600 has well defined “corner” edges at the joints between to planar and edge surfaces 610, 616, which can be useful in certain types of grinding operations, such as in the application of a split point to a drill bit.
It will now be appreciated that the tool sharpening assembly 100 provides several advantages over the prior art. A variety of different types of cutting tools can be sharpened quickly and efficiently. Extremely sharp cutting edges can be produced with little or no set-up or fixturing time.
It will be noted that the various preferred embodiments discussed herein are directed to a semi-manual system wherein a user manipulates the tool during the sharpening process. While this is preferred, such is not necessarily required or limiting. In further preferred embodiments, a tool can inserted into a given port and an automated reciprocating mechanism cycles the tool until the desired sharpness is achieved.
Similarly, depending on the desired level of throughput, additional or alternative mechanisms can be provided so that one or both of the abrasive surfaces are manipulated to provide the same relative motions as described above. Such mechanisms can be implemented in a variety of ways by the skilled artisan and therefore further explanation of such are not provided for purposes of brevity. However, in view of this unless otherwise indicated it will be understood that reference to the second abrasive member (e.g.,
It is to be understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of various embodiments of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of various embodiments of the invention, this detailed description is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of structure and arrangements of parts within the principles of the present invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed. For example, the particular elements may vary depending on the particular environment employed without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
The present application makes a claim of priority under 35 U.S.C. §371 to PCT Application PCT/US2006/048882 filed Dec. 21, 2006, and a claim of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/782,843 filed Dec. 21, 2006.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/048882 | 12/21/2006 | WO | 00 | 12/14/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/106169 | 9/20/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1581919 | Case | Apr 1926 | A |
2814171 | Bogart | Nov 1957 | A |
3420010 | Tobey | Jan 1969 | A |
4607459 | Rees | Aug 1986 | A |
4627194 | Friel | Dec 1986 | A |
4672777 | Dunkin | Jun 1987 | A |
4928436 | Linden | May 1990 | A |
4961288 | Ketteringham | Oct 1990 | A |
4996797 | Laughton | Mar 1991 | A |
5018310 | Fierus et al. | May 1991 | A |
5251407 | Afshar | Oct 1993 | A |
5311703 | Ketteringham | May 1994 | A |
5718620 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5941763 | Kaye | Aug 1999 | A |
6007415 | Van Osenbruggen | Dec 1999 | A |
6071183 | Havins | Jun 2000 | A |
6257967 | Schultz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261161 | Yan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6626745 | Bernard | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6676495 | Siemers et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6852014 | Gleason | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6926596 | Tarris | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7281969 | Naples et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20030207651 | Kim et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20060258271 | Naples et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070218819 | Schwaiger et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090124181 | Levsen | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2325161 | Jun 1999 | CN |
WO 2004014605 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Patent Office search report in connection with EP Application No. 06850598.1; pp. 1-4. |
“M-Power Tools website, DMT-M.Power PSS1, Sep. 19, 2006, http://www.m-powertools.com/products/pss1/pss1.htm”. |
“Precision Sharpening System,” Instruction sheet for PSS1, M.Power Tools Ltd., 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080214095 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60782843 | Mar 2006 | US |