The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in XML format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said XML copy, created on Aug. 11, 2023, is named “50412-120004_SL” and is 664,716 bytes in size.
The invention relates to antagonists of α4β7 integrin, and more particularly to cyclic peptide antagonists.
Integrins are transmembrane receptors that are the bridges for cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions. When triggered, integrins trigger chemical pathways to the interior (signal transduction), such as the chemical composition and mechanical status of the ECM.
Integrins are obligate heterodimers, having two different chains: the α (alpha) and β (beta) subunits.
The α4β7 integrin is expressed on lymphocytes and is responsible for T-cell homing into gut-associated lymphoid tissues through its binding to mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule (MAdCAM), which is present on high endothelial venules of mucosal lymphoid organs. Inhibitors of specific integrin-ligand interactions have been shown effective as anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of various autoimmune diseases. For example, monoclonal antibodies displaying high binding affinity for α4β7 have displayed therapeutic benefits for gastrointestinal auto-inflammatory/autoimmune diseases, such as Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis.
There is a need to develop improved α4β7 antagonists to prevent or treat inflammatory conditions and/or autoimmune diseases.
Certain methods of making cyclic peptides (nacellins) are described in Applicant's PCT Publication No. WO 2010/105363.
In an aspect, there is provided, a multimer comprising a plurality of compounds covalently linked together, the compounds independently being of formula (I):
In an aspect, there is provided, a pharmaceutical composition comprising the multimer described herein along with the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated for any one of oral delivery, topical delivery and parenteral delivery.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method of treating inflammation or an autoimmune disease in a patient, comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein. Preferably the inflammation or an autoimmune disease is gastrointestinal.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method for treating a condition in a patient associated with a biological function of an α4β7 integrin, the method comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method for treating a disease or condition in a patient comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein, wherein the disease or condition is a local or systemic infection of a virus or retrovirus.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method for treating a disease or condition in a patient comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein, wherein the hepatitis A, B or C, hepatic encephalopathy, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, variceal bleeding, hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, tyrosinemia, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, glycogen storage disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cancer, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary sclerosis, biliary tract disease, autoimmune hepatitis, or graft-versus-host disease.
These and other features of the preferred embodiments of the invention will become more apparent in the following detailed description in which reference is made to the appended drawings and tables wherein:
Table 1 shows compounds exhibiting α4β7 integrin affinity, selectivity and/or activity; and specifically with respect to these compounds: (A) the structure of the linker portion; (B) the structure of the peptide portion; and (C) and (C′) the affinity, selectivity and activity values.
To aid reading of the table, the following is noted:
Table 1A:
Table 1C and 1C′
Table 1X is a correspondence table linking the compounds described herein with the synthesis protocols outlined in the methods and materials.
Table 2 shows multimeric compounds exhibiting α4β7 integrin affinity, selectivity and/or activity; and specifically with respect to these compounds: (A) the structure of the linker portion; (B) the structure of the peptide portion; and (C) the affinity, selectivity and activity values.
To aid reading of the table, the following is noted:
Table 2A
Table 2X is a correspondence table linking the multimers described herein with the synthesis protocols outlined in the methods and materials. m/z is (M+2H/2) and additional information regarding the linker.
Table 3 is a table of the sequence listing
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it is understood that the invention may be practiced without these specific details.
In an aspect, there is provided, a multimer comprising a plurality of compounds covalently linked together, the compounds independently being of formula (I):
The compounds shown in Tables 1A, 1B and 1C (and 1C′) exhibit antagonistic activity against α4β7 integrin and having selectivity over α4β1 integrin. A person skilled in the art would expect that substituents R1-R8 and amino acids Xy, Xz, X1, X2, and X3 outlined in Tables 1 A and 1B with respect to different compounds could be combined in any manner and would likely result in a compound that would exhibit α4β7 integrin activity and selectivity. These compounds are further described in WO 2017/079820, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Multimerized, specifically dimerized, versions of certain compounds described herein exhibited affinity, selectivity and activity, summarized in Tables 2A, 2B and 20.
As used herein, the term “amino acid” refers to molecules containing an amine group, a carboxylic acid group and a side chain that varies. Amino acid is meant to include not only the twenty amino acids commonly found in proteins but also non-standard amino acids and unnatural amino acid derivatives known to those of skill in the art, and therefore includes, but is not limited to, alpha, beta and gamma amino acids. Peptides are polymers of at least two amino acids and may include standard, non-standard, and unnatural amino acids. A peptide is a polymer of two or more amino acids.
The following abbreviations are used herein:
The term “suitable substituent” as used in the context of the present invention is meant to include independently H; hydroxyl; cyano; alkyl, such as lower alkyl, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, n-butyl, t-butyl, hexyl and the like; alkoxy, such as lower alkoxy such as methoxy, ethoxy, and the like; aryloxy, such as phenoxy and the like; vinyl; alkenyl, such as hexenyl and the like; alkynyl; formyl; haloalkyl, such as lower haloalkyl which includes CF3, CCl3 and the like; halide; aryl, such as phenyl and napthyl; heteroaryl, such as thienyl and furanyl and the like; amide such as C(O)NRaRb, where Ra and Rb are independently selected from lower alkyl, aryl or benzyl, and the like; acyl, such as C(O)—C6H5, and the like; ester such as —C(O)OCH3 the like; ethers and thioethers, such as O-Bn and the like; thioalkoxy; phosphino; and —NRaRb, where Ra and Rb are independently selected from lower alkyl, aryl or benzyl, and the like. It is to be understood that a suitable substituent as used in the context of the present invention is meant to denote a substituent that does not interfere with the formation of the desired product by the processes of the present invention.
As used in the context of the present invention, the term “lower alkyl” as used herein either alone or in combination with another substituent means acyclic, straight or branched chain alkyl substituent containing from one to six carbons and includes for example, methyl, ethyl, 1-methylethyl, 1-methylpropyl, 2-methylpropyl, and the like. A similar use of the term is to be understood for “lower alkoxy”, “lower thioalkyl”, “lower alkenyl” and the like in respect of the number of carbon atoms. For example, “lower alkoxy” as used herein includes methoxy, ethoxy, t-butoxy.
The term “alkyl” encompasses lower alkyl, and also includes alkyl groups having more than six carbon atoms, such as, for example, acyclic, straight or branched chain alkyl substituents having seven to ten carbon atoms.
The term “aryl” as used herein, either alone or in combination with another substituent, means an aromatic monocyclic system or an aromatic polycyclic system. For example, the term “aryl” includes a phenyl or a napthyl ring, and may also include larger aromatic polycyclic systems, such as fluorescent (eg. anthracene) or radioactive labels and their derivatives.
The term “heteroaryl” as used herein, either alone or in combination with another substituent means a 5, 6, or 7-membered unsaturated heterocycle containing from one to 4 heteroatoms selected from nitrogen, oxygen, and sulphur and which form an aromatic system. The term “heteroaryl” also includes a polycyclic aromatic system comprising a 5, 6, or 7-membered unsaturated heterocycle containing from one to 4 heteroatoms selected from nitrogen, oxygen, and sulphur.
The term “cycloalkyl” as used herein, either alone or in combination with another substituent, means a cycloalkyl substituent that includes for example, but is not limited to, cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl and cycloheptyl.
The term “cycloalkyl-alkyl-” as used herein means an alkyl radical to which a cycloalkyl radical is directly linked; and includes, but is not limited to, cyclopropylmethyl, cyclobutylmethyl, cyclopentylmethyl, 1-cyclopentylethyl, 2-cyclopentylethyl, cyclohexylmethyl, 1-cyclohexylethyl and 2-cyclohexylethyl. A similar use of the “alkyl” or “lower alkyl” terms is to be understood for aryl-alkyl-, aryl-loweralkyl- (eg. benzyl), -lower alkyl-alkenyl (eg. allyl), heteroaryl-alkyl-, and the like as used herein. For example, the term “aryl-alkyl-” means an alkyl radical, to which an aryl is bonded. Examples of aryl-alkyl- include, but are not limited to, benzyl (phenylmethyl), 1-phenylethyl, 2-phenylethyl and phenylpropyl.
As used herein, the term “heterocycle”, either alone or in combination with another radical, means a monovalent radical derived by removal of a hydrogen from a three- to seven-membered saturated or unsaturated (including aromatic) cyclic compound containing from one to four heteroatoms selected from nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur. Examples of such heterocycles include, but are not limited to, aziridine, epoxide, azetidine, pyrrolidine, tetrahydrofuran, thiazolidine, pyrrole, thiophene, hydantoin, diazepine, imidazole, isoxazole, thiazole, tetrazole, piperidine, piperazine, homopiperidine, homopiperazine, 1,4-dioxane, 4-morpholine, 4-thiomorpholine, pyridine, pyridine-N-oxide or pyrimidine, and the like.
The term “alkenyl”, as used herein, either alone or in combination with another radical, is intended to mean an unsaturated, acyclic straight chain radical containing two or more carbon atoms, at least two of which are bonded to each other by a double bond. Examples of such radicals include, but are not limited to, ethenyl (vinyl), 1-propenyl, 2-propenyl, and 1-butenyl.
The term “alkynyl”, as used herein is intended to mean an unsaturated, acyclic straight chain radical containing two or more carbon atoms, at least two of which are bonded to each other by a triple bond. Examples of such radicals include, but are not limited to, ethynyl, 1-propynyl, 2-propynyl, and 1-butynyl.
The term “alkoxy” as used herein, either alone or in combination with another radical, means the radical —O—(C1-n)alkyl wherein alkyl is as defined above containing 1 or more carbon atoms, and includes for example methoxy, ethoxy, propoxy, 1-methylethoxy, butoxy and 1,1-dimethylethoxy. Where n is 1 to 6, the term “lower alkoxy” applies, as noted above, whereas the term “alkoxy” encompasses “lower alkoxy” as well as alkoxy groups where n is greater than 6 (for example, n=7 to 10). The term “aryloxy” as used herein alone or in combination with another radical means —O-aryl, wherein aryl is defined as noted above.
A protecting group or protective group is a substituent introduced into a molecule to obtain chemoselectivity in a subsequent chemical reaction. Many protecting groups are known in the art and a skilled person would understand the kinds of protecting groups that would be incorporated and could be used in connection with the methods described herein. In “protecting group based peptide synthesis”, typically solid phase peptide synthesis, the desired peptide is prepared by the step-wise addition of amino acid moieties to a building peptide chain. The two most widely used protocols, in solid-phase synthesis, employ tert-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) or 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) as amino protecting groups. Amino protecting groups generally protect an amino group against undesirable reactions during synthetic procedures and which can later be removed to reveal the amine. Commonly used amino protecting groups are disclosed in Greene, T. W. et al., Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons (1999). Amino protecting groups include acyl groups such as formyl, acetyl, propionyl, pivaloyl, t-butylacetyl, 2-chloroacetyl, 2-bromoacetyl, trifluoroacetyl, trichloroacetyl, o-nitrophenoxyacetyl, .alpha.-chlorobutyryl, benzoyl, 4-chlorobenzoyl, 4-bromobenzoyl, 4-nitrobenzoyl, and the like; sulfonyl groups such as benzenesulfonyl, p-toluenesulfonyl and the like; alkoxy- or aryloxy-carbonyl groups (which form urethanes with the protected amine) such as benzyloxycarbonyl (Cbz), p-chlorobenzyloxycarbonyl, p-methoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, p-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl, 2-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl, p-bromobenzyloxycarbonyl, 3,4-dimethoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, 3,5-dimethoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, 2,4-dimethoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, 4-methoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, 2-nitro-4,5-dimethoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, 1-(p-biphenylyl)-1-methylethoxycarbonyl, .alpha.-, .alpha.-dimethyl-3,5-dimethoxybenzyloxycarbonyl, benzhydryloxycarbonyl, t-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc), diisopropylmethoxycarbonyl, isopropyloxycarbonyl, ethoxycarbonyl, methoxycarbonyl, allyloxycarbonyl (Alloc), 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl, 2-trimethylsilylethyloxycarbonyl (Teoc), phenoxycarbonyl, 4-nitrophenoxycarbonyl, fluorenyl-9-methoxycarbonyl (Fmoc), cyclopentyloxycarbonyl, adamantyloxycarbonyl, cyclohexyloxycarbonyl, phenylthiocarbonyl and the like; aralkyl groups such as benzyl, triphenylmethyl, benzyloxymethyl and the like; and silyl groups such as trimethylsilyl and the like. Amine protecting groups also include cyclic amino protecting groups such as phthaloyl and dithiosuccinimidyl, which incorporate the amino nitrogen into a heterocycle. Typically, amino protecting groups include formyl, acetyl, benzoyl, pivaloyl, t-butylacetyl, phenylsulfonyl, Alloc, Teoc, benzyl, Fmoc, Boc and Cbz. It is well within the skill of the ordinary artisan to select and use the appropriate amino protecting group for the synthetic task at hand.
In some embodiments, R1 is H.
In some embodiments, R2 or R3 is covalently linked to R1 to form proline having NR1 as the N-terminus.
In some embodiments, R2 and R3 are not both H.
In some embodiments, R2 and R3 are each independently selected from the group consisting of amino acid chains of a proteinogenic or a non-proteinogenic alpha-amino acids.
In some embodiments, R2 and R3 are H and CH3 respectively or vice versa.
In some embodiments, R2 or R3 is —CH2-S—Rs, wherein Rs is selected from lower alkyl; lower amino alkyl; aryl; heteroaryl; alkenyl; or heterocycle; all of which are optionally substituted at one or more substitutable positions with one or more suitable substituents; preferably Rs is phenyl or phenyl substituted with lower alkyl, halogen; or lower amino alkyl.
In some embodiments, R4 and R5 are not both H.
In some embodiments, R** and R*** are not both H.
In some embodiments, R4 and R5 are each independently H, or C(O)—NHRt, wherein Rt is H or a lower alkyl. Preferably, Rt is tert-butyl or H.
In some embodiments, R6 is H.
In some embodiments, R6 and either R8 or R9 form a ring resulting in a proline residue having N—R6 as its N-terminus.
In some embodiments, n is 1.
In some embodiments, Z along with L and —C═O is any one of SEQ ID NOs. 1-380.
In some embodiments, X1 is Leu.
In some embodiments, X2 is Asp.
In some embodiments, X3 is Thr.
In some embodiments, X3 is Val.
In some embodiments, X3 is lie.
In some embodiments, Xy and Xz are each independently a proteinogenic or non-proteinogenic alpha-amino acid.
In some embodiments, Xz is a proteinogenic or non-proteinogenic beta-amino acid.
In some embodiments, Xz is betaHomoLys or MethylbetaHomoLys.
In some embodiments, Xy and Xz are each a primary amino acid.
In some embodiments, Xy and Xz are each any amino acid listed under column Xy and column Xz respectively of Table 1B.
In various embodiments, the compound is any one of compounds 1-389 and 456 or the multimer is any one of compounds 390-397 and 457-538.
In various embodiments, the multimer is a dimer, trimer, tetramer, or pentamer.
In some embodiments, the monomer compounds are linked by a linker.
In some embodiments, the compounds are linked together at a carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulphur or other atom associated with R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7/R8, Xz, or Xy.
As person skilled in the art would understand that various linkers may be used to multimerize the macrocycles described herein, including esters, amides, amines or mixed amides/amines.
Additional linkages include, but are not limited to, ethers, thioethers, thioesters, disulphides, sulfoxides, sulfones, sulfonamides, sulfamates, sulfamides, carbamates, ureas, carbonates, phosphodiesters, phosphonamides, phosphoramidates, heterocycles such as triazoles from azide-alkyne cycloaddition (“Click” chemistry). Alternatively, monomeric macrocycles can be covalently attached to linkers via carbon-carbon single bond linkages, carbon-carbon double bond linkages or carbon-carbon triple bond linkages. Alternatively, monomeric macrocycles can be covalently attached directly to a second, third or fourth monomeric macrocycle via any of the above linkages; in this case no formal linker moiety is present.
In some embodiments, the multimer is a homo-multimer.
In some embodiments, the multimer is a hetero-multimer.
In certain embodiments, there is provided pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds described herein. The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salt,” as used herein, represents salts or zwitterionic forms of the compounds of the present invention which are water or oil-soluble or dispersible, which are suitable for treatment of diseases without undue toxicity, irritation, and allergic response; which are commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio, and which are effective for their intended use. The salts can be prepared during the final isolation and purification of the compounds or separately by treatment of an amino group with a suitable acid. Representative acid addition salts include acetate, adipate, alginate, citrate, aspartate, benzoate, benzenesulfonate, bisulfate, butyrate, camphorate, camphorsulfonate, digluconate, glycerophosphate, hemisulfate, heptanoate, hexanoate, formate, fumarate, hydrochloride, hydrobromide, hydroiodide, 2-hydroxyethansulfonate (isethionate), lactate, maleate, mesitylenesulfonate, methanesulfonate, naphthylenesulfonate, nicotinate, 2-naphthalenesulfonate, oxalate, pamoate, pectinate, persulfate, 3-phenylproprionate, picrate, pivalate, propionate, succinate, tartrate, trichloroacetate, trifluoroacetate, phosphate, glutamate, bicarbonate, para-toluenesulfonate, and undecanoate. Also, amino groups in the compounds of the present invention can be quaternized with methyl, ethyl, propyl, and butyl chlorides, bromides, and iodides; dimethyl, diethyl, dibutyl, and diamyl sulfates; decyl, lauryl, myristyl, and steryl chlorides, bromides, and iodides; and benzyl and phenethyl bromides. Examples of acids which can be employed to form therapeutically acceptable addition salts include inorganic acids such as hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, and phosphoric, and organic acids such as oxalic, maleic, succinic, and citric. In certain embodiments, any of the peptide compounds described herein are salt forms, e.g., acetate salts.
In an aspect, there is provided, a pharmaceutical composition comprising the multimer described herein along with the pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated for any one of oral delivery, topical delivery and parenteral delivery.
As used herein, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” means any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings, antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorption delaying agents, and the like that are physiologically compatible. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include one or more of water, saline, phosphate buffered saline, dextrose, glycerol, ethanol and the like, as well as combinations thereof. In many cases, it will be preferable to include isotonic agents, for example, sugars, polyalcohols such as mannitol, sorbitol, or sodium chloride in the composition. Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers may further comprise minor amounts of auxiliary substances such as wetting or emulsifying agents, preservatives or buffers, which enhance the shelf life or effectiveness of the pharmacological agent.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method of treating inflammation or an autoimmune disease in a patient, comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein. Preferably the inflammation or an autoimmune disease is gastrointestinal.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method for treating a condition in a patient associated with a biological function of an α4β7 integrin, the method comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein.
In some embodiments, the condition or disease is Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, Celiac disease (nontropical Sprue), enteropathy associated with seronegative arthropathies, microscopic colitis, collagenous colitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, pouchitis resulting after proctocolectomy and ileoanal anastomosis, gastrointestinal cancer, pancreatitis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, mastitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, pericholangitis, chronic bronchitis, chronic sinusitis, asthma, primary sclerosing cholangitis, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the GI tract, eosinophilic asthma, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastritis, colitis, microscopic colitis, graft versus host disease, colitis associated with radio- or chemo-therapy, colitis associated with disorders of innate immunity as in leukocyte adhesion deficiency-1, chronic granulomatous disease, glycogen storage disease type 1b, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, Chediak-Higashi syndrome, and Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome, or pouchitis resulting after proctocolectomy and ileoanal anastomosis and various forms of gastrointestinal cancer, osteoporosis, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, weight gain, and depression. In another embodiment, the condition is pancreatitis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, mastitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis, pericholangitis, chronic bronchitis, chronic sinusitis, asthma or graft versus host disease.
In preferable embodiments, is an inflammatory bowel disease, such as ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method for treating a disease or condition in a patient comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein, wherein the disease or condition is a local or systemic infection of a virus or retrovirus.
In some embodiments, the a virus or retrovirus is echovirus 1 and 8, echovirus 9/Barty Strain, human papilloma viruses, hantaviruses, rotaviruses, adenoviruses, foot and mouth disease virus, coxsackievirus A9, human parechovirus 1 or human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
In an aspect, there is provided, a method for treating a disease or condition in a patient comprising administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of the multimer described herein, wherein the hepatitis A, B or C, hepatic encephalopathy, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, variceal bleeding, hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, tyrosinemia, alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, glycogen storage disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cancer, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary sclerosis, biliary tract disease, autoimmune hepatitis, or graft-versus-host disease.
In some embodiments, the multimer inhibits binding of α4β7 integrin to MAdCAM. Preferably, the compound selectively inhibits binding of α4β7 integrin to MAdCAM.
In any embodiment, the patient is preferably a human.
As used herein, the terms “disease”, “disorder”, and “condition” may be used interchangeably.
As used herein, “inhibition,” “treatment,” “treating,” and “ameliorating” are used interchangeably and refer to, e.g., stasis of symptoms, prolongation of survival, partial or full amelioration of symptoms, and partial or full eradication of a condition, disease or disorder in a subject, e.g., a mammal.
As used herein, “prevent” or “prevention” includes (i) preventing or inhibiting the disease, injury, or condition from occurring in a subject, e.g., a mammal, in particular, when such subject is predisposed to the condition but has not yet been diagnosed as having it; or (ii) reducing the likelihood that the disease, injury, or condition will occur in the subject.
As used herein, “therapeutically effective amount” refers to an amount effective, at dosages and for a particular period of time necessary, to achieve the desired therapeutic result. A therapeutically effective amount of the pharmacological agent may vary according to factors such as the disease state, age, sex, and weight of the individual, and the ability of the pharmacological agent to elicit a desired response in the individual. A therapeutically effective amount is also one in which any toxic or detrimental effects of the pharmacological agent are outweighed by the therapeutically beneficial effects.
In some embodiments, the compound is administered by a form of administration selected from the group consisting of oral, intravenous, peritoneal, intradermal, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intrathecal, inhalation, vaporization, nebulization, sublingual, buccal, parenteral, rectal, vaginal, and topical.
In some embodiments, the compound is administered as an initial does followed by one or more subsequent doses and the minimum interval between any two doses is a period of less than 1 day, and wherein each of the doses comprises an effective amount of the compound.
In some embodiments, the effective amount of the compound is the amount sufficient to achieve at least one of the following selected from the group consisting of: a) about 50% or greater saturation of MAdCAM binding sites on α4β7 integrin molecules; b) about 50% or greater inhibition of α4β7 integrin expression on the cell surface; and c) about 50% or greater saturation of MAdCAM binding sites on α4β7 molecules and about 50% or greater inhibition of α4β7 integrin expression on the cell surface, wherein i) the saturation is maintained for a period consistent with a dosing frequency of no more than twice daily; ii) the inhibition is maintained for a period consistent with a dosing frequency of no more than twice daily; or iii) the saturation and the inhibition are each maintained for a period consistent with a dosing frequency of no more than twice daily.
In some embodiments, the compound is administered at an interval selected from the group consisting of around the clock, hourly, every four hours, once daily, twice daily, three times daily, four times daily, every other day, weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly.
The compounds described herein may be multimerized using methods and linkers that would be known to a person of skill in the art, for example, as described in WO2016/054411.
The advantages of the present invention are further illustrated by the following examples. The examples and their particular details set forth herein are presented for illustration only and should not be construed as a limitation on the claims of the present invention.
Methods and Materials
Synthesis
Methods applicable for making the cyclic peptides described herein can be found generally in Applicant's PCT Publication No. WO 2010/105363 and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/775,319 claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/254,003 filed on Nov. 11, 2015.
More specifically, the below protocols were used to synthesize each of the compounds as indicated in Table 1X. Multimer of the compounds were also synthesized as indicated in Table 2X.
Protocol A: General Nacellin Synthesis
1. Preparation of resin: Fmoc amino acid (1.1 eq. with respect to resin) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL/g of resin). If the amino acid did not dissolve completely, DMF was added slowly dropwise until a homogeneous mixture persisted upon stirring/sonication. The 2-chlorotrityl resin was allowed to swell in CH2Cl2 (5 mL/g of resin) for 15 minutes. The CH2Cl2 was then drained and the Fmoc amino acid solution was added to the vessel containing the 2-Cl Trt resin. DIPEA was added (2 eq. with respect to the amino acid) and the vessel was agitated for five minutes. Another 2 eq. of DIPEA was then added and the vessel was left to agitate for an additional 60 minutes. The resin was then treated with methanol (1 mL/g of resin) to endcap any remaining reactive 2-Cl Trt groups. The solution was mixed for 15 minutes, drained and then rinsed with CH2Cl2 (×3), DMF (×3), CH2Cl2 (×2), and MeOH (×3). The resin was then dried under vacuum and weighed to determine the estimated loading of Fmoc amino acid.
2. Preparation of linear peptide sequence via manual or automated synthesis: Fully protected resin-bound peptides were synthesized via standard Fmoc solid-phase peptide chemistry manually or using an automated peptide synthesizer. All N-Fmoc amino acids were employed.
a. Fmoc deprotection: the resin was treated with 20% piperidine in NMP or DMF twice, for 5 and 10 minutes respectively, with consecutive DMF and NMP washes after each addition.
b. Fmoc amino acid coupling: the resin was treated with 3 eq. of Fmoc amino acid, 3 eq. of HATU and 6 eq. of DIPEA in NMP for 60 minutes. For difficult couplings, a second treatment with 3 eq. of Fmoc amino acid, 3 eq. of HATU and 6 eq. of DIPEA in NMP for 40 minutes was employed.
3. General cleavage with retention of protecting groups: Once the desired linear sequence was synthesized, the resin was treated with either 1.) 1:3, HFIP:CH2Cl2 or 2.) 5% TFA in CH2Cl2, twice for 30 minutes each, to afford cleavage from the solid support. The solvent was then removed, followed by trituration twice with chilled tert-butyl methyl ether (or diethyl ether/hexanes) to give the desired product. The purity was then analyzed by reverse-phase LCMS.
Protocol B: Preparation of N-Alkylated Fmoc Amino Acid Building Blocks
1. Resin prep: see protocol A, step 1
2. Fmoc deprotection: see protocol A, step 2a
3. Nosyl protection: The deprotected resin was stirred in CH2Cl2 (5 mL/mmol of resin) and DIPEA (6.5 eq.). A solution of Nosyl chloride (4.0 eq.) was added slowly, dropwise, over 30 minutes, to avoid a rapid exothermic reaction. After the addition was complete, stirring was continued at room temperature for three hours. The resulting nosyl-protected resin was filtered and washed with CH2Cl2, MeOH, CH2Cl2, and THF.
4. N-Methylation: To a suspension of resin in THF (10 mL/mmol of resin) was added a solution of triphenylphosphine (5 eq.) in THF (2 M) and MeOH (10 eq.). The stirring suspension was cooled in an ice bath. A solution of DIAD (5 eq.) in THF (1 M) was added dropwise, via addition funnel. After addition was complete the bath was removed and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for an additional 90 minutes. The resin was filtered, washed with THF (×4), CH2Cl2 (×3), and THF (×2).
5. Nosyl-deprotection: To a suspension of resin in NMP (10 mL/mmol of resin) was added 2-mercaptoethanol (10.1 eq.) and DBU (5.0 eq.). The solution became a dark green colour. After five minutes, the resin was filtered, washed with DMF until washes ran colourless. This procedure was repeated a second time, and the resin was then washed a final time with CH2Cl2.
6. Fmoc protection: To a suspension of resin in CH2Cl2 (7 mL/mmol of resin) was added a solution of Fmoc-Cl (4 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (7 mL), and DIPEA (6.1 eq.). The suspension was stirred at room temperature for four hours then filtered and washed with CH2Cl2 (×2), MeOH (×2), CH2Cl2 (×2), and Et2O (×2).
7. Cleavage from resin: see protocol A, step 3
Protocol C: Reductive Amination
1. Fmoc Weinreb amide formation: a mixture of Fmoc amino acid (1 mmol), N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine-HCl (1.2 eq.), and HCTU (1.2 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (6.5 mL), was cooled to 0° C. DIPEA (3 eq.) was then slowly added to the stirring mixture. The cooling bath was removed and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. A 10% solution of HCl (4 mL) was added resulting in the formation of a precipitate, which was removed through filtration. The filtrate was washed with 10% HCl (3×4 mL) and brine (2×4 mL). The organic phase was then dried over Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give crude Fmoc Weinreb amide, which was used in the next reaction without purification.
2. a) Fmoc amino aldehyde formation: lithium aluminum hydride powder (1.5 eq) was placed in a dry flask. THF (Sigma-Aldrich, 250 ppm of BHT, ACS reagent >99.0%, 6.5 mL) was added, and the resulting slurry was cooled to −78° C., with stirring. To the slurry was added a solution of the Fmoc Weinreb amide in THF (10 mL). The reaction vessel was transferred to an ice/water bath, and maintained at 0° C. for 1 h. To the reaction at 0° C., was added dropwise acetone (1.5 mL), then H2O (0.25 mL) and then the reaction was left to stir for an additional hour at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through Celite, washed with EtOAc (10 mL) and MeOH (10 mL), and the filtrate was concentrated. The crude material was dissolved in CHCl3 (6.5 mL) and washed with brine (2×3 mL) and the organic phase was then dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to give the Fmoc amino aldehyde.
Alternatively, b) Under argon atmosphere a Lithium Aluminum Hydride 1.0 M solution in THF (Sigma-Aldrich, 157.81 mL, 157.82 mmol, 1 eq.) was slowly added over a solution of the Weinreb amide (157.82 mmol) in THF (Sigma-Aldrich, 250 ppm of BHT, ACS reagent >99.0%, 1 L) at 0° C. and then stirred for 1 h. The reaction at 0° C., was diluted with Et2O (500 mL) and the resultant solution was washed with 10% NaHSO4 (10×300 mL), 10% KHSO4 (10×300 mL) and HCl (10×300 mL). The organic phase was then dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to afford the crude Fmoc amino aldehyde.
3. Reductive amination on-resin: the linear peptide on-resin was placed in a solid-phase peptide synthesis reaction vessel and diluted with DMF (22 mL/g of resin). The Fmoc aldehyde (4.0 eq.) was added and the reaction was left to shake overnight. The solution was then drained and the resin was washed with CH2Cl2 (×3) and DMF (×3). The resin was then diluted with a mixture of MeOH/CH2Cl2 (22 mL/g of resin, 1:3 ratio) and NaBH4 (7 eq.) was subsequently added. The mixture was left to shake for four hours, then the solution was drained and the resin was washed with CH2Cl2 (×3) and DMF (×3).
Protocol D: Fragment-Based Macrocyclization
a) In a two-dram vial, 0.1 mmol of the linear peptide and DEPBT (1.5 eq.) were dissolved in 5 mL of freshly distilled THF (0.02 M). DIPEA (3 eq.) was then added and the reaction mixture was left to stir overnight at room temperature (16 h). Tetraalkylammonium carbonate resin (Biotage®, 6 eq.) was then added to the reaction mixture and stirring was continued for an additional 24 h. The reaction was then filtered through a solid-phase extraction vessel and rinsed with CH2Cl2 (2 mL). The filtrate and washes were combined and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
Alternatively, b) In a two-dram vial, 0.1 mmol of the linear peptide and HATU (2.0 eq.) were dissolved in 80 mL of CH2Cl2 (1.25 mM). DIPEA (6 eq.) was then added and the reaction mixture was left to stir overnight at room temperature (16 h). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
Protocol E: Aziridine Aldehyde-Based Macrocyclization
The linear peptide was dissolved in TFE (if solubility problems were encountered, a 50:50 mixture of TFE:CH2Cl2 was used for the cyclization). Then 0.6 eq. of (S)-aziridine-2-carboxaldehyde dimer (prepared as per literature protocol: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (46), 14772-14773 and Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5 (11), 1813-1822) as a TFE stock solution (0.2 M) was added, giving a final reaction mixture concentration of 0.1 M. tert-Butyl isocyanide (1.2 eq.) was then added and the reaction mixture was stirred for four hours. Progress was analyzed along the way via LC-MS.
Protocol F: Nucleophilic Ring-Opening of Acyl Aziridine, Post Macrocyclization
a) Thioacetic acid/thiobenzoic acid: the corresponding thio acid (4 eq.) was added to the crude reaction mixture. Reaction progress was monitored by LC-MS, and was generally complete after 1-2 hours.
Alternatively, b) Thiophenol: Thiophenol (4 eq.) and DIPEA (4 eq.) were added to the crude cyclization mixture. Reaction progress was monitored by LC-MS, and was generally complete after 1-2 hours. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure and dried under vacuum. Crude material was either triturated with Et2O/hexanes or TBME, or alternatively, diluted with H2O, frozen and lyophilized.
Protocol G: Suzuki Coupling, Post Macrocyclization
a) As a general example, an iodo-Phe-containing macrocycle (0.1 mmol), Na2COs(2 eq.), substituted boronic acid (1.1 eq.) and 4 mL of water:acetonitrile (1:1 ratio) were combined in a microwave vial. The mixture was treated with N2 gas flow for 10 minutes. While under N2, silicon based Pd-catalyst (Siliacat-DPP Pd heterogenous catalyst, 0.05 eq.) was added. The reaction vial was sealed and placed in the microwave for 10 minutes at 120° C. (reaction time and temperature were increased to 30 min. and 150° C., depending on the substrate) or thermally heated at 90° C. for 1 h. Reaction progress was monitored by LCMS. Once complete, the reaction was filtered through a Celite plug and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
Alternatively, b) as a specific example, Suzuki couplings with macrocycles that were prepared using 3-(((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)methyl)-4-bromobenzoic acid were conducted as follows: A mixture of crude macrocyclic Compound 340 that had been orthogonally protected as the p-tert-butyl ester of the Asp residue and the tert-butyl ether of the Thr residue (200 mg, 0.22 mmol) and 4-(4-Boc-piperazino) phenylboronic acid pinacol ester (171 mg, 0.44 mmol) were dissolved in a 1,2-dimethoxyethane (5.4 mL) and Ethanol (1.2 mL) at room temperature. Water (1.2 mL) was added to the solution, followed by Na2COs(35 mg, 0.33 mmol). The reaction flask was flushed for at least 5 to 10 min under nitrogen gas and then catalyst SiliaCat-DPP Pd (88 mg, 10 mol %, 0.25 mmol/gm) was added. The reaction mixture was heated with stirring under nitrogen at 90° C. for 1 hr. LCMS after 1 hour showed complete consumption of substrate and ˜ 5% de-bromination compound; the desired Suzuki cross-coupled product represented ˜ 84% yield after taking into account the excess of boronate ester by UV. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered over a celite pad to remove catalyst SiliaCat-DPP Pd. The celite pad was washed with a little DCM and the solvents were removed under vacuum to give pale yellow crude solid as the Suzuki coupling product. Reagent 3-(((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)methyl)-4-bromobenzoic acid was itself prepared from methyl 3-(aminomethyl)-4-bromobenzoate (US2011251247) via saponification of the methyl ester and protection of the amine as the Fmoc carbamate, as follows: to a solution of methyl 3-(aminomethyl)-4-bromobenzoate (1.36 g, 5.57 mmol) in Dioxane (33 ml) and Water (9 ml) was added lithium hydroxide (6.13 ml, 6.13 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 3 hrs at room temperature. TLC showed the hydrolysis reaction was complete. Dioxane (16 ml) was added. The mixture was neutralized by the addition of 1 N HCl (aq) (6.17 mL). Sodium bicarbonate (0.468 g, 5.57 mmol) was added, followed by (9H-fluoren-9-yl)methyl carbonochloridate (2.162 g, 8.36 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 2 hrs at room temperature and was acidified to pH 3 by the addition of 1 N HCl (aq) (6.2 mL). Water (40 ml) was added, extracted with AcOEt (4×150 mL). The combined organic layers were dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporated to ˜50 ml. Precipitation began to occur and was allowed to slowly continue overnight at room temperature. White solid was then collected by filtration, washed with hexane and dried under high vacuum to afford 3-(((((9H-fluoren-9-yl)methoxy)carbonyl)amino)methyl)-4-bromobenzoic acid (2.0 g, 4.42 mmol, 79% yield).
Protocol H: General Ulmann Coupling, Post Macrocyclization
Under inert atmosphere, the peptide macrocycle (0.018 mmol) was placed in a 2-dram vial containing 2 mL of dry CH2Cl2. Cu(OAc)2 (1 eq.), benzene boronic acid (2 eq.) and 4 Å (oven-dried) molecular sieves were then added to the vial followed by DIPEA (4 eq.). The contents of the vial were stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction progress was assessed by LCMS. Once the reaction was deemed complete, the mixture was filtered through a Celite plug and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
Protocol I: General Global Deprotection and Cleavage
Deprotection of the side chain protecting groups was achieved by dissolving the peptides in 2 mL of a cleavage cocktail consisting of TFA:H2O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5) for two hours (for sensitive peptides the mixture of TFA:H2O:TIS (95:2.5:2.5) may be substituted for a mixture of TFA:CH2Cl2 (50:50)). Subsequently, the cleavage mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure and the peptides were precipitated twice from chilled diethyl ether/hexanes (or tert-butyl methyl ether).
Protocol J: General Cleavage of Reductively-Labile Protecting Groups
a) Pd/C and formic acid debenzylation: the benzyl protected macrocycle (0.35 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (8 mL) with 10% formic acid, 10% wt. Pd/C (Sigma-Aldrich, 37 mg, 0.1 Eq) and heated to 55° C. for 1 h to 4 h. Once the reaction was deemed complete, the mixture was filtered through a Celite plug, washed with MeOH and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.
Or alternatively, b) Raney Ni desulfurization/debenzylation: Raney Ni slurry (1-2 mL) was added directly to the cyclization reaction mixture and stirred vigorously overnight. The vial was then centrifuged and the liquid was transferred using a pipette to a tared vial. MeOH was added to the vial containing Raney Ni. The vial was then sonicated, vortexed, and centrifuged. Again, the liquid was transferred to a tared vial. This process was repeated with EtOAc and then a final time with MeOH. The combined washes were then removed under reduced pressure and the residue dried under vacuum.
Protocol K: Amidation of Side Chain, Post Macrocyclization
Macrocycle (0.021 mmol) was dissolved in 1 mL of CH3CN. K2CO3 (5 eq.) and the corresponding acid chloride (2 eq.) were then added and the reaction mixture was left to stir at room temperature overnight. Reaction progress was checked by LC-MS in the morning. Upon completion, the solvent was removed by reduced pressure.
Protocol L: Fluorescent Dye Attachment
The macrocycle (4 μmol) was dissolved in DMSO (200 μL). DIPEA (5 eq.) was then added. In a separate vial, 5 mg of fluorescent dye as the NHS ester was dissolved in 200 μL of DMSO. The macrocycle solution was then added to the solution of the fluorescent label. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight. Reaction progress was checked by LC-MS in the morning and then the solvent was removed by lyophilization.
Protocol M: Purification Methods
All macrocycles were purified using reverse-phase flash column chromatography using a 30 g RediSep C18 Gold Column. The gradient consisted of eluents A (0.1% formic acid in double distilled water) and B (0.1% formic acid in HPLC-grade acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 35 mL/min.
Multimerization Protocols
Protocol N: Linker Synthesis for Multimerization
a) Preparation of Acyl chloride linkers: Di-, tri- or tetra-carboxylic acids (1 eq.) and CH2Cl2 (0.114 M concentration) were added to a two-dram vial. SOCl2 (15 eq. per carboxylic acid) was then added and the reaction mixture was left to stir for four hours at room temperature (some substrates required heating at 70° C. overnight for full solution and/or conversion). The solvent was removed via N2 flow. The residue was dissolved in 3 mL of dry CH2Cl2 which was then removed under N2 flow. This process was performed two additional times in an attempt to remove any free HCl from the sample. The resulting residue was then used without purification in the dimerization reaction.
b) Preparation of Benzotriazole linkers, Method A: Thionyl chloride (2 eq. per carboxylic acid) was added to a solution of benzotriazole (10 eq. per carboxylic acid) in dichloromethane (20 mL per mmol of starting linker) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The di-, tri- or tetra-carboxylic acids (1 eq.) were added to each mixture, which were then stirred at room temperature for 24 h (a change in order of addition did not materially alter the outcome). The reaction was quenched with NaHCO3 (10%, 100 mL) and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with HCl (10%, 2×100 mL) and NaHCO3 (10%, 2×100 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and evaporated under vacuum to give the desired Benzotriazole-activated carboxylic acids.
c) Preparation of Benzotriazole linkers, Method B: To a suspension of HATU (1.5 eq. per carboxylic acid), Benzotriazole (2 eq. per carboxylic acid) and the di-, tri- or tetra-carboxylic acids (1 eq.) in dichloromethane (20 mL per mmol of starting linker) was added DIPEA (3 eq. per carboxylic acid) and the resultant yellow solution was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The reaction was quenched with NaHCO3 (10%, 100 mL) and the layers were separated. The organic layer was washed with HCl (10%, 2×100 mL) and NaHCO3 (10%, 2×100 mL), dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and evaporated under vacuum to give the desired Benzotriazole-activated carboxylic acids
d) Preparation of Lys(CBz)-Pimelic acid-Lys(CBz) linker: Pimelic acid was converted to the bis-Benzotriazole-activated moiety using Protocol Nb. Commercial Nα—Z-L-lysine methyl ester hydrochloride (2 eq.; Chemlmpex) was treated with bis-Benzotriazole-activated Pimelic acid (1 eq.) in CH3CN (0.011 M) containing DIPEA (10 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). The solvent was removed by rotoevaporation and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified bis-methyl ester of Lys(CBz)-Pimelic acid-Lys(CBz) as an intermediate. To a solution of the bis-methyl ester (1.5 mmol, 1.0 eq.) in THF (10 mL) were added LiCl (3.0 mmol, 2.0 eq.) and LiOH—H2O (3.0 mmol, 2.0 eq.), followed by H2O (250 uL) to help solubilize the salts. The reaction was stirred at room temperature overnight. Upon completion of the hydrolysis, as assessed by LC-MS monitor, formic acid was added dropwise to neutralize the basic solution. The solvent was removed by rotoevaporation and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified di-acid linker.
e) Preparation of PEG2-Diglycolic acid-PEG2 linker: Diglycolyl chloride (0.35 mmol; 1 eq.; Sigma Aldrich cat. No. 378151) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was treated with NH2—PEG2-CH2CH2COOtBu (2 eq.; Biochempeg Cat. No. MD005067-2), followed by dropwise addition of DIPEA (3.5 mmol, 10.0 eq); NB—this order of addition proved to be very important. The reaction was monitored by LC-MS. After 30 min., the reaction was complete, and longer stirring times did not affect the product ratio. The solvents were removed in vacuo and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified di-tert-butyl ester intermediate. Removal of the tert-butyl ester groups was effected by Protocol I. The diacid linker was isolated as a crude and used as such multimerization reactions without further manipulation.
f) Preparation of PEG2-Diphenic acid-PEG2 linker: Diphenic acid was converted to the bis-Benzotriazole-activated moiety using Protocol Nb. Commercial NH2—PEG2-CH2CH2COOtBu (2 eq.; Biochempeg Cat. No. MD005067-2) was treated with bis-Benzotriazole-activated Diphenic acid (1 eq.) in CH3CN (0.011 M) containing DIPEA (10 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). The solvent was removed by rotoevaporation and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified di-tert-butyl ester intermediate. Removal of the tert-butyl ester groups was effected by Protocol I. The diacid linker was isolated as a crude and used as such in multimerization reactions without further manipulation.
g) Preparation of PEG2-Pimelic acid-PEG2 linker: Pimelic acid was converted to the bis-Benzotriazole-activated moiety using Protocol Nb. Commercial NH2—PEG2-CH2CH2COOtBu (2 eq.; Biochempeg Cat. No. MD005067-2) was treated with bis-Benzotriazole-activated Pimelic acid (1 eq.) in CH3CN (0.011 M) containing DIPEA (10 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). The solvent was removed by rotoevaporation and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified di-tert-butyl ester intermediate. Removal of the tert-butyl ester groups was effected by Protocol I. The diacid linker was isolated as a crude and used as such in multimerization reactions without further manipulation.
Protocol O: Nacellin Multimerization
a) Multimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using bis- or tris-acyl chloride-activated linkers: The corresponding acyl chloride (0.35 mmol, 1.0 eq.), freshly prepared and under Argon atmosphere, was dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (5 mL; note that larger scale reactions required more-concentrated solution to produce higher-yielding dimerizations). Monomeric macrocycle (2, 3 or 4 eq. for bis-, tris-, or tetra-acyl chlorides), optimally supplied as the free-base/non-salted form of the reacting amine center, was added to the flask, followed by dropwise addition of DIPEA (3.5 mmol, 10.0 eq); NB—this order of addition proved to be very important. The reaction was monitored by LC-MS. After 30 min., the reaction was complete, and longer stirring times did not affect the product ratio. The solvents were removed in vacuo and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified product.
b) Multimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using Benzotriazole-activated linkers: To a solution of monomeric macrocycle (2, 3 or 4 eq.), optimally supplied as the free-base/non-salted form of the reacting amine center, and the corresponding Benzotriazole-activated linker, previously prepared but not longer than 1 week prior to multimerization, (0.011 mmol, 1 eq.) in CH3CN (1 mL) in the presence of DIPEA (0.02 mL, 0.114 mmol, 10 eq). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). The solvent was removed by rotoevaporation and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified product.
c) Dimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using 2-Chloroacetyl chloride: To a solution of the monomeric macrocycle (0.0571 mmol, 2 eq.), optimally supplied as the free-base/non-salted form of the reacting amine center, in distilled THF (1.0 mL), were added 2-chloroacetyl chloride (3.19 mg, 0.029 mmol, 1 eq.) followed by DIPEA (25 uL, 0.17 mmol, 6.0 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). NaI (8.5 mg, 0.05708 mmol, 2 eq) was then added and the reaction mixture was heated at 50° C. for 2 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified product.
d) Dimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using Acryloyl chloride: To a solution of the monomeric macrocycle (0.0571 mmol, 2 eq.), optimally supplied as the free-base/non-salted form of the reacting amine center, in distilled THF (1.0 mL), were added Acryloyl chloride (2.6 mg, 0.029 mmol, 1 eq.) and then DIPEA (25 uL, 0.17 mmol, 6.0 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). DBU (8.5 uL, 0.057 mmol, 2 eq) was then added and the reaction was heated at 50° C. for 5 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo and the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified product.
e) Multimerization of hydoxyl-containing monomeric macrocycles: Di-, tri- or tetra-carboxylic acid linker (4.3 μmol), monomeric macrocycle (2, 3 or 4 eq.), DMAP (2, 3 or 4 eq.), and EDC-HCl (4, 8 or 12 eq.) were dissolved in DCM (500-1000 μL). The reaction mixture was left to stir at room temperature overnight. Reaction progress was assessed by LC-MS. Upon completion, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude was submitted to reverse-phase silica chromatography (Biotage) to obtain the purified product.
f) Dimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using 2,4-dichloro-5-nitropyrimidine: To a solution of 2,4-dichloro-5-nitropyrimidine (2.0 mg, 0.010 mmol, 1.0 equiv) and monomeric macrocycle (0.021 mmol, 2.1 eq.), optimally supplied as the free-base/non-salted form of the reacting amine center, in chloroform (1 mL), in a 1-dram vial, was added DIPEA (0.02 mL, 0.11 mmol, 11.0 equiv); the reaction mixture immediately turned yellow. Stirring was continued at room temperature overnight, at which point LC-MS analysis exhibited almost full conversion to desired dimer. An additional 24 h of reaction time did not lead to any further conversion. Solvent was rotoevaporated to dryness, and the crude residue was submitted to reverse-phase chromatography to afford the purified material in 76% isolated yield.
g) Multimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using HATU-activated linkers: To a solution of the monomeric macrocycle (2, 3 or 4 eq.), optimally supplied as the free-base/non-salted form of the reacting amine center, in 1 mL dry DCM, was added the di-, tri- or tetra-substituted carboxylic acid (1 eq.) under inert atmosphere at room temperature. HATU (3, 6 or 9 eq.) was added to the solution, followed by the addition of DIPEA (3, 6 or 9 eq.). The reaction mixture was left to stir overnight. Assessment of reaction progress by LC-MS after 14 h indicated completion. The reaction mixture was rotoevaporated to near-dryness, then placed under high vacuum. If no orthogonal protecting groups required removal (for example, amines protected as the CBz carbamate), the crude material was submitted to reverse-phase chromatography to afford the purified material.
h) Multimerization of amine-containing monomeric macrocycles using halide-activated linkers: To a solution of monomeric macrocycle (3.0 eq. if used with a dihalide, 4.5 eq. if used with a trihalide) and the corresponding di or tri-halide linker (1.0 eq) in CH3CN (2 mL) was added DIPEA (˜ 30 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h (monitored by LC-MS). The solvent was removed, and crude was submitted to reverse-phase chromatography to afford the purified material.
Integrin α4β7-MAdCAM-1 ELISA Competition Assay
A 96-well Microlon plate (Greiner, 655001) was coated with 100 μl per well of a solution of 1 μg/ml recombinant integrin α4β7 (R&D Systems, 5397-A3-050) in carbonate buffer (50 mM, pH 9.6). The plate was incubated at 4° C. overnight. The solution was removed and 250 μl blocking buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 1% BSA, 0.05% Tween) was added per well. The plate was then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The plate was washed three times with wash buffer (50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.05% Tween). To each well, 50 μl of compound diluted in assay buffer was added by transfer from a compound serial dilution plate. 50 μl recombinant MAdCAM-Fc (R&D systems, 6056-MC-050) at a concentration of 0.1 μg/ml in assay buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.1% BSA, 0.05% Tween) was added to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature with shaking (300 rpm) for 2 hours to reach binding equilibrium. Then the plate was washed three times in wash buffer and 100 μl anti-human IgG Fc specific-HRP (Abcam, Ab97225) diluted at 1:2000 in assay buffer was added to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour under agitation. The plate was then washed three times and 100 μl of 1,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenxidie (TMB, KPL 5120-0083) was then added to each well. The reaction was stopped after 2 minute-incubation by adding 50 μl of 1 M H2SO4 and optical absorbance was read at 450 nM.
Integrin α4β1-VCAM-1 Competition ELISA
A 96-well Microlon plate (Greiner, 655001) was coated with 100 μl per well of a solution of 0.5 μg/ml recombinant integrin α4β1 (R&D Systems, 5397-A3-050) in carbonate buffer (50 mM, pH 9.6). The plate was incubated at 4° C. overnight. The solution was removed and 250 μl blocking buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 1% BSA, 0.05% Tween) was added per well. The plate was then incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The plate was washed three times with wash buffer (50 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.05% Tween). To each well, 50 μl of compound diluted in assay buffer was added by transfer from a compound serial dilution plate. 50 μl recombinant VCAM-Fc (R&D systems, 862-VC-100) at a concentration of 0.1 μg/ml in assay buffer (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.1% BSA, 0.05% Tween) was added to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature with shaking (300 rpm) for 2 hours to reach binding equilibrium. Then the plate was washed three times in wash buffer and 100 μl anti-human IgG Fc specific-HRP (Abcam, Ab97225) diluted at 1:2000 in assay buffer was added to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour under agitation. The plate was then washed three times and 100 μl of 1,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenxidie (TMB, (TMB, KPL 5120-0083) was then added to each well. The reaction was stopped after 2 minute-incubation by adding 50 PI of 1 M H2SO4 and optical absorbance was read at 450 nM.
Integrin α4β7-MAdCAM Cell Adhesion Assay
RPM18866 human cells (Sigma #95041316) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone SH30027.1) supplemented with 10% FBS (Seradigm) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin. A 96-well plate (Costar, 3603) was coated with 100 ml/well of human recombinant MAdCAM-1 Fc Chimera (R&D Systems, 6056-MC-050) solution at 0.25 μg/ml in coating buffer (50 mM sodium carbonate, pH 9.6). The plate was incubated overnight at 4° C. and washed twice with 150 μl per well wash buffer (0.05% Tween 20 in PBS), blocked with 250 μl per well blocking buffer (1% non-fat dry milk in PBS), and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. RPM18866 cells were resuspended at 10 million cells/ml in PBS containing 5 mM calcein and incubated at 37° C. for 30 min in a 50 ml tube. PBS was added to fill the tube, cells were spun down and resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium to 2 million/ml. Compounds were diluted by serial dilution in binding buffer (1.5 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MnCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) to a final volume of 50 μl per well at 2× concentration. The plate was washed once with 300 □l of PBS, 50 μl of compound and 50 μl of cells (100,000 cells) were transferred to each well and the plate was incubated in the dark at 37° C., 5% CO2 for 45 min to allow cell adhesion. The plate was emptied by inverting and blotting on paper towels and washed manually twice with PBS. 100 μl PBS was then added to each well. The fluorescence was read (Ex495/Em515) using a plate reader (Tecan Infinite 1000). To calculate the dose response, the fluorescence value of control wells not containing cells was subtracted from each test well.
Integrin α4β1-VCAM Cell Adhesion Assay
RAMOS human cells (ATCC CRL-1596) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone SH30027.1) supplemented with 10% FBS (Seradigm) and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin. A 96-well plate (Costar, 3603) was coated with 100 ml/well of recombinant human VCAM-1 Fc Chimera (R&D systems, 862-VC-100) solution at 0.25 μg/ml in coating buffer (50 mM sodium carbonate, pH 9.6). The plate was incubated overnight at 4° C. and washed twice with 150 μl per well wash buffer (0.05% Tween 20 in PBS), blocked with 250 μl per well blocking buffer (1% non-fat dry milk in PBS), for 1 hour at room temperature. During blocking step, RAMOS cells were resuspended at 10 million cells/ml in PBS containing 5 mM calcein and incubated at 37° C. for 30 min in a 50 ml tube. PBS was added to fill the tube, cells were spun down and resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium to 2 million/ml. Compounds were diluted by serial dilution in binding buffer (1.5 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MnCl2, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) to a final volume of 50 μl per well at 2× concentration. The plate was washed once with 300 μl of PBS, 50 μl of compound and 50 μl of cells (100,000 cells) were transferred to each well and the plate was incubated in the dark at 37° C., 5% CO2 for 45 min to allow cell adhesion. The plate was emptied by inverting and blotting on paper towels and washed manually twice with PBS. After last wash, 100 μL of PBS was added to wells and the fluorescence was read (Ex495/Em515) using a plate reader (Tecan Infinite 1000). To calculate the dose response, the fluorescence value of control wells not containing cells was subtracted from each test well.
Analyte Competition Assay in CD4+ Integrin α4+β7-Lo Memory T Cells
Receptor occupancy in primary cells was determined by measuring the amount of biotinylated human recombinant MAdCAM-1-FC or human recombinant VCAM-1-Fc bound to selected cell populations using flow cytometry. Human recombinant MAdCAM-1-FC or human recombinant VCAM-1-FC (R&D systems) were biotinylated using commercially available reagents and protocol (Pierce).
Whole blood was collected from human donors in sodium heparin tubes. A volume of 100 microL of blood was incubated with compound and 4 mM MnCL2 for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with 1 mL of 1×DPBS calcium magnesium free (CMF) (ThermoFisher Scientific) and resuspended in 100 microL of DPBS CMF.
Biotinylated human recombinant MAdCAM-1-Fc or VCAM-1-Fc were added at saturating concentration and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. A volume of 2 mL of 1×BD FACS Lyse (BD Biosciences) was then added and the mixture was incubated for 8-12 minutes at room temperature in the dark to lyse red blood cells. Cells were washed with 1 mL stain buffer-FBS (BD Biosciences) and resuspended in 100 μl stain Buffer-FBS (BD Biosciences) containing 4 mM MnCl2. Biotinylated-rhMAdCAM-1 was applied at a saturating concentration of 1200 ng/mL to compete with test article binding and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. Cells were then washed with 1 mL stain buffer-FBS and resuspended in 100 μl stain buffer-FBS. The cells were incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature with 1 ul Streptavidin APC (Biolegend 0.2 mg/ml) and a panel of antibodies for the detection of memory T helper a4b7-positive cells subset. And amount of 5.0 ul each of the following antibodies were used; CD45 FITC (BioLegend 200 ug/ml), CD29 APC Cy7 (BioLegend 100 ug/ml), Integrin beta7 PE, (BioLegend concentration 50 μg/mL), CD49d V421 (BioLegend 50 μg/mL), CD3 V510 (BioLegend 30 μg/mL), CD4 PECy7 (BioLegend 100 μg/mL), CD45RO PerCP, BioLegend 200 μg/mL). The cells were then washed with stain-buffer-FBS and resuspended in 150 microL stain buffer-FBS for acquisition on the flow cytometer (BD FACSCanto™ flow cytometer and BDFACSDiva™ software). FACS data was acquire by electronic gating on the basis of forward versus side scatter, The cytometer was set to collect 20,000 events in each tube. Cell population were determined using the following markers, CD45+, CD3+, CD4+, CD45RO+, CD49d+, integrin b7, biotinylated ligands.
Compound receptor occupancy was defined as the decrease in the number of integrin β7+ or integrin β7-lo cells binding biotinylated rhMAdCAM-1 or rhVCAM-1, respectively.
Receptor occupancy was calculated with the following equation: 100−((% ligand-positive cells with compound/% ligand-positive cells DMSO)*100)
In vivo T lymphocyte trafficking analysis in mouse model of colitis
Animal care: The animal care facility employed is accredited by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). This study was approved by a certified Animal Care Committee and complied with CACC standards and regulations governing the use of animals for research. The animals were housed under standardized environmental conditions. A standard certified commercial rodent diet was provided ad libitum. Tap water was provided ad libitum at all times.
Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) was administered to C57Bl/6 female mice for five days through addition to their drinking water at 3%. Body weight and disease activity index (“DAI”) were measured on Day 5 in order to distribute DSS-treated animals in uniform groups prior to dosing. DAI was scored based on the severity three specific symptoms associated with colitis: 1—blood in stool (negative hemoccult, positive hemoccult, blood traces in stool visible, rectal bleeding); 2—stool consistency (normal, soft but still formed, very soft, diarrhea); 3—body weight loss.
From Day 6 to day 9, Compound No. 517 (ET03764) or the vehicle were administered orally daily at 5 ml/kg. On day 9, four hours after dosing, the animals were euthanized by cardiac puncture under general anesthesias. Mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) were collected, triturated, and washed in HBSS-FCS. The cells were incubated for 15 minutes in BD mouse FcBlock followed by 30-minute incubation with specific antibodies. After washes, cells were either fixed using BD fix solution or immediately process for cell surface marker staining. The antibodies used were as followed: CD4 PE (BD Bioscience), CD44 FITC (BD Biosciences), CD45RB PerCy 5.5 (BD Biosciences), α4b7 PE (eBiosciences). Cell populations were then analyzed using FACSCanto cytometer and gating on CD4+, CD44hi, CD45RBlow, α4β7+.
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism. Differences among groups were evaluated by two-way ANOVA, with a 95% confidence interval.
Results and Discussion
Compounds were synthesized in accordance with the above-noted methods. A selection of compounds was characterized using NMR (not all data shown). A subset of NMR data is provided in
Binding Affinity and Selectivity of Compounds for Integrin α4β7 and α4β1
We measured binding potency for monomeric and dimeric compounds to α4β7-integrin using a battery of biochemical, cell-based and ex-vivo assays. Multimeric compounds were generally more potent in cellular assays.
We measured the ability of test articles to prevent the adhesion of RMP18866 cells, which express integrin α4β7, to plates coated with MAdCAM-1. Multimeric compounds were generally more potent in their ability to inhibit cell adhesion than their constituent monomers. For example Compound No. 340 (ET2451) and Compound No. 456 (ET4062) had IC50 of 175 and 199 nM respectively in the RPM18866 cell adhesion assays (Table 1C and 1C′). Multimeric compounds with over 10-fold greater potency than their constituent monomeric compounds were generated. For example, Compound No. 517 (ET3764), a homodimer of Compound No. 340 (ET2451), had an IC50 of 9.9 nM in the RPM18866 cell adhesion assay. Compound multimers generated from monomeric Compound 456 (ET4062) also showed higher binding affinity (Table 2C).
Similar results were obtained in a ligand competition assay for binding to integrin α4β7 in human whole blood. Receptor occupancy of nacellins was determined by measuring the proportion of α4β7+ memory T helper cells able to bind biotinylated rhMAdCAM-1 using flow cytometry (
Interestingly, differences in binding affinity between monomeric and multimeric compounds were not as pronounced in ELISA binding assays. It is possible that avidity enhances the binding potency of multimeric compounds in cells.
Multimeric compounds showed enhanced selectivity for integrin α4β7 over integrin α4β1. In order to determine the selectivity of the compounds in cell assays, we measured the adhesion of Ramos cells, which express integrin α4β1 to VCAM-coated plates. Multimeric compounds had generally higher selectivity for integrin α4β7 over integrin α4β1 than their monomeric constituents. For example, monomeric Compound No.s 340 (ET2451) and 456 (ET4062) showed 16- and 45-fold selectivity, respectively, when comparing α4β7 versus α4β1 cell adhesion assays. In contrast, multimeric compounds based on monomeric Compound No. 340 (ET2451) exhibited 20- to 100-fold selectivity in favor of integrin α4β7, and multimeric compounds based on monomeric Compound No. 456 (ET4062) exhibited no measurable effect on the adhesion of α4β1l-expressing Ramos cells to VCAM (Table 2C).
In Vivo T Lymphocyte Trafficking Analyses
The ability of several integrin alpha-4-beta-7-inhibiting compounds to attenuate the trafficking of integrin alpha-4-beta-7-expressing T lymphocytes was demonstrated in in vivo pharmacodynamics studies in DSS-treated mice. Dextran Sodium Sulfate (DSS) induces chronic colitis in experimental animals when given orally in drinking water for five days followed by no DSS in drinking water. Chronic inflammation is associated with the infiltration of leucocytes from the blood to intestinal tissues. The interaction between integrin α4β7 and MAdCAM-1 on the endothelium of the gut allows adhesion and trafficking of T cells to the gut. The ability of several integrin alpha-4-beta-7-inhibiting nacellins to attenuate the trafficking of integrin alpha-4-beta-7-expressing T lymphocytes was demonstrated in in vivo pharmacodynamics studies in DSS-treated mice.
A study was conducted in which mice were exposed for 5 days to dextran sulfate in their drinking water. On days 6 to 9, compounds or vehicle were administered orally daily. Mesenteric lymph nodes were collected 4 hours following the last dose and assessed. As shown in
We determined that the level of reduction in α4β7+ T helper memory lymphocytes detected in the mesenteric lymph nodes of DSS treated mice was dependent on the dose of Compound No. 517 administered.
We compared the ability of compounds to inhibit the binding of labeled human recombinant MADCAM-1 or VCAM to α4β7-positive or α4β7-negative Th memory cells respectively. Whole blood from a single donor was incubated with compounds and saturated amounts of recombinant ligands. The inhibition of MAdCAM or VCAM binding was measured on T cell subsets using FACS analysis. As shown in
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims. All documents disclosed herein, including those in the following reference list, are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5296604 | Hanko et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5693325 | Kahn | Dec 1997 | A |
5693612 | Jonczyk et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5693750 | Ohki et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696084 | Lartey et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705481 | Jonczyk et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5731286 | Harbeson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6034056 | Dutta | Mar 2000 | A |
6492553 | Hulme et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
9533985 | Ueno et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
10981921 | Vazquez et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11046695 | Vazquez et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11072616 | Vazquez et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11111273 | Morshed | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11713338 | Morshed | Aug 2023 | B2 |
20080200398 | Smyth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100093612 | Casiraghi et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110251247 | Chubb et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20140023700 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140193465 | Bhandari et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20160159862 | Bhandari et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20190077805 | Vazquez et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200165300 | Vazquez et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2427046 | Nov 2003 | CA |
1449385 | Oct 2003 | CN |
104144706 | Nov 2014 | CN |
105102470 | Nov 2015 | CN |
3219113 | Nov 1983 | DE |
H10-508315 | Aug 1998 | JP |
WO-9600581 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO-9620216 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO-9702289 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO-9703094 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO-2001010799 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-0202556 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO-02066500 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-2008046232 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2009141687 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO-2010105363 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010107832 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2013110578 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014059213 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO-2015176035 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO-2016054411 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2016054445 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2017079820 | May 2017 | WO |
WO-2017079821 | May 2017 | WO |
WO-2018085921 | May 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Wang et al, Journal of Internal Medicine, 2015, 278, 369-395 (Year: 2015). |
Slack et al, Nat Rev Drug Discov., 2022, 21(1), 60-78 (Year: 2022). |
Banerjee et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Mar. 2022, vol. 10, 1-28 (Year: 2022). |
Bruno et al, Ther Deliv, Nov. 2013, 4(11), 1443-1467 (Year: 2013). |
Achmatowicz et al., “The synthesis of L-proline derived hexaazamacrocyclic ligands of C3 symmetry via intramolecular methyl ester aminolysis,” Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 12(3):487-495 (2001). |
Annex I: Summary of Product Characteristics for Entyvio, May 7, 2020 (93 pages). |
Baktharaman et al., “Amino carbonyl compounds in organic synthesis,” Aldrichimica Acta. 41(4):109-119 (2008). |
Berezov et al., “Medicine,” Biological chemistry, Moscow. p. 34, 59 (1998). |
Boer et al., “Design and synthesis of potent and selective alpha(4)beta(7) integrin antagonists,” J Med Chem. 44(16):2586-92 (2001). |
Bova et al., “A label-free approach to identify inhibitors of alpha4beta7-mediated cell adhesion to MadCAM,” J Biomol Screen. 16(5):536-44 (2011). |
Burden et al., “Synthesis and biological activities of YkFA analogues: effects of position 4 substitutions and altered ring size on in vitro opioid activity,” Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 12(2):213-6 (2002). |
Chen et al., “Synthesis of 12-membered macrocyclic templates and library analogs for PPI,” Tetrahedron Letters. 54(25):3298-301 (2013). |
Chen et al., “Vedolizumab for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Blood Adv. 3(23):4136-46 (2019). |
Couturier et al., “Aziridinium from N,N-dibenzyl serine methyl ester: synthesis of enantiomerically pure beta-amino and alpha,beta-diamino esters,” Org Lett. 8(10):2183-6 (2006). |
Cushing et al., “Vedolizumab as a Novel Treatment for Refractory Collagenous Colitis: A Case Report,” Am J Gastroenterol. 113(4):632-3 (2018). |
Dörwald, F. Zaragoza. Side Reactions in Organic Synthesis: A Guide to Successful Synthesis Design, Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2005, Preface (6 pages). |
Dutta et al., “Potent cyclic monomeric and dimeric peptide inhibitors of VLA-4 (alpha4beta1 integrin)-mediated cell adhesion based on the lle-Leu-Asp-Val tetrapeptide,” J Pept Sci. 6(7):321-41 (2000). |
Dyson et al., Chemistry of synthetic medicines. May's Chemistry of Synthetic Drugs, Fifth Edition. Moscow: Mir. pp. 12-19 (1964). |
Examination Report for Indian Application No. 201817021544, mailed May 18, 2020 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16863253.7, dated Oct. 17, 2019 (6 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17870529.9, dated Jul. 28, 2020 (14 pages). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18798999.1, dated Jun. 1, 2021 (14 pages). |
Gorfu et al., “Role of betaz integrins in intestinal lymphocyte homing and retention,” available in PMC Sep. 1, 2010, published in final edited form as: Curr Mol Med. 9(7):836-50 (2009) (24 pages). |
Gottschling et al., “Synthesis and NMR structure of peptidomimetic alpha-4-beta-7-integrin antagonists,” Chembiochem. 3(6):575-8 (2002). |
Greene et al., “Preface to the Third Edition,” Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, Third Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., v-vi (1999) (6 pages). |
Hili et al., “Macrocyclization of linear peptides enabled by amphoteric molecules,” J Am Chem Soc. 132(9):2889-91 (2010). |
Hili et al., “Readily available unprotected amino aldehydes,” J Am Chem Soc. 128(46):14772-3 (2006). |
Hirose et al., “Total synthesis and determination of the absolute configuration of guadinomines B and C2,” Chemistry. 14(27):8220-38 (2008). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/CA2016/000274, mailed Dec. 19, 2016 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/CA2016/000275, mailed Feb. 28, 2017 (15 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in Corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/CA2017/000244, mailed Feb. 8, 2018 (7 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/CA2018/000087, mailed Aug. 7, 2018 (7 pages). |
Jennings et al., “Vedolizumab-Induced Remission in 3 Patients With Refractory Microscopic Colitis: A Tertiary Care Center Case Series,” Inflamm Bowel Dis. 25(8):e97 (Jul. 17, 2019). |
Kim et al., “Vedolizumab Treatment May Reduce Steroid Burden and Improve Histology in Patients With Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis,” available in PMC Dec. 1, 2019, published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 16(12):1992-1994, Epub Mar. 27, 2018 (Dec. 2018) (7 pages). |
Li et al., “Abstract S12-085: Study on the Mechanism of Force Control and Hole Control Integrating the Interaction of alpha4, 7, and MAdCAM-1,” Journal of Medical Biomechanics 33 Suppl.:334 (Aug. 2018). |
Mohan et al., “Synthesis and biological activity of angiotensin II analogues containing a Val-His replacement, Val psi[CH(CONH2)NH]His,” J Med Chem. 34(8):2402-10 (1991). |
Murray et al., “The synthesis of cyclic tetrapeptoid analogues of the antiprotozoal natural product apicidin,” Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 11(6):773-6 (2001). |
Naveh et al., “Developing potent backbone cyclic peptides bearing the shared epitope sequence as rheumatoid arthritis drug-leads,” Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 22(1):493-6 (2012). |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 17870529.9, mailed Apr. 23, 2020 (10 pages). |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 18798999.1, dated Feb. 2, 2021 (11 pages). |
Patil et al., “Second generation, arginine-rich (R-X′-R)(4)-type cell-penetrating alpha-omega-alpha-peptides with constrained, chiral omega-amino acids (X′) for enhanced cargo delivery into cells,” Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 24(17):4198-202 (Sep. 1, 2014, Epub Jul. 19, 2014). |
Pil et al., “Synthesis and electrophysiological characterization of cyclic morphiceptin analogues,” Biochem Pharmacol. 67(10):1887-95 (2004). |
Quartara et al., “Influence of lipophilicity on the biological activity of cyclic pseudopeptide NK-2 receptor antagonist,” J Med Chem. 37(21):3630-8 (1994). |
Ribaldone et al., “Vedolizumab for treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis: a systematic review with pool analysis,” Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 112(1):59-63 (Jan. 2020). |
Rotstein et al., “Synthesis of peptide macrocycles using unprotected amino aldehydes,” Nat Protoc. 5(11):1813-22 (2010). |
Roxin et al., “Conformational Modulation of in Vitro Activity of Cyclic RGD Peptides via Aziridine Aldehyde-Driven Macrocyclization Chemistry.”, Bioconjug Chem 23(7), 1387-1395 (Jul. 2012) (9 pages). |
Slama et al., “Convenient Synthesis of 1,2-Diamines from beta-Chloro Amines: Precursors of New Substituted Piperazin-2-ones” Synthetic Communications. 43(17):2286-2293 (2013). |
Su, Youming, Dissertation: “The force-dependent mechanism of integrin alpha4beta7-MAdCAM-1 interaction,” Master Degree, South China University of Technology, 2019 (English abstract included) (71 pages). |
Suarez-Gea et al., “A General Method for the Synthesis of Carbamoylmethyleneamino Pseudopeptides” J Org Chem. 59(13):3600-3 (1994). |
Supporting Information for Patil et al., “Second generation, arginine-rich (R-X′-R)(4)-type cell-penetrating alpha-omega-alpha-peptides with constrained, chiral omega-amino acids (X′) for enhanced cargo delivery into cells,” Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 24(17):4198-202 (Sep. 1, 2014, Epub Jul. 19, 2014). |
Tal-Gan et al., “Backbone cyclic peptide inhibitors of protein kinase B (PKB/Akt),” J Med Chem. 54(14):5154-64 (2011). |
Tamamura et al., “Stereoselective synthesis of [L-Arg-L/D-3-(2-naphthyl)alanine]-type (E)-alkene dipeptide isosteres and its application to the synthesis and biological evaluation of pseudopeptide analogues of the CXCR4 antagonist FC131,” J Med Chem. 48(2):380-91 (2005). |
Treder et al., “Solid-phase synthesis of piperazinones via disrupted Ugi condensation,” Org Lett. 16(17):4674-7 (Sep. 5, 2014, Epub Aug. 25, 2014). |
Vercillo et al., “Design and synthesis of cyclic RGD pentapeptoids by consecutive Ugi reactions,” Org Lett. 10(2):205-8 (2008). |
Verheijen et al., “An expeditious liquid-phase synthesis of cyclic peptide nucleic acids,” Tetrahedron Letters. 41(20):3991-5 (2000). |
Wagner et al., “New naturally occurring amino acids,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 22(11):816-28 (1983). |
Wyant et al., “Development and validation of receptor occupancy pharmacodynamic assays used in the clinical development of the monoclonal antibody vedolizumab,” Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 90(2):168-76 (Mar. 2016). |
Yoosuf et al., “Evolving Therapy for Celiac Disease,” Front Pediatr. 7:193 (May 14, 2019) (18 pages). |
Yu et al., “Structural specializations of alpha4beta7, an integrin that mediates rolling adhesion,” J Cell Biol. 196(1):131-46 (2012). |
Yudin et al., “Overcoming the demons of protecting groups with amphoteric molecules,” Chemistry 13(23):6538-42 (2007). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230406884 A1 | Dec 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62421117 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17234488 | Apr 2021 | US |
Child | 18207268 | US | |
Parent | 16348103 | US | |
Child | 17234488 | US |