This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/624,649, entitled “Cyclic shift delay detection using autocorrelations” and filed on Sep. 21, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/624,646, entitled “Cyclic shift delay detection using a channel impulse response” and filed on Sep. 21, 2012, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
I. Field of the Invention
This disclosure relates generally to apparatus and methods for mobile positioning, and more particularly to determining final transmission in a cyclic-shift diversity (CSD) signaling mode.
II. Background
To estimate a location, a mobile device may capture received signal strength indication (RSSI) measurements from three or more access points. A server or the mobile device itself may apply trilateration to these RSSI measurements to estimate a position of the mobile device, however, these RSSI measurements have a large standard deviation. Unfortunately, trilateration with such RSSI measurements results in a high level of uncertainty because of the uncertainty of the RSSI measurement levels.
To alleviate high uncertainties associated with RSSI measurements, round-trip time (RTT) measurements may be used. RTT measurements advantageously have a much lower level of uncertainty than the RSSI measurements. RTT measurements record a round-trip time from initiating a signal from the mobile device to an access point and back to the mobile device. Though several uncertainties exist with RTT measurement, these variables may be determined or estimated with less uncertainty that is associated with RSSI measurements. A server or a mobile device may use the RTT measurements in trilateration to more accurately estimate the position of the mobile device.
Recently, Cyclic Shift Diversity (CSD) has been introduced into the IEEE 802.11n standard to improve reception by spatial spreading the streams across multiple antennas and transmitting the same signal with different cyclic shifts. With the effects of multiple transmissions and multipath, RTT measurements no longer provide reliable time measurements because of multiple possible start times.
Various CSD modes are defined in the IEEE 802.11n standard. A single-transmitter system does not use cyclic shifting (CSD mode 1). In other words, CSD is disabled when operating in CSD mode 1 and only one transmitter is operating. When two or more transmitters are operating, cyclic shifting may be disabled and identical signals are transmitted from each antenna. Alternatively, cyclic shifting may be enabled and a different time-shifted signal of an original signal is transmitted from each antenna. In CSD mode 2, two transmitters transmit: a first transmitter transmits the original signal and a second transmitter transmits a time-shifted signal advanced by 200 ns using cyclic shifting. In CSD mode 3, three transmitters transmit: a first transmitter transmits the original signal, a second transmitter transmits a time-shifted signal advanced by 100 ns, and a third transmitter transmits a signal advanced by an additional 100 ns. In CSD Mode 4, four transmitters transmit: a first transmitter transmits the original signal, a second transmitter advances the signal by 50 ns, a third transmitter advances the signal by an additional 50 ns, and a fourth transmitter advances the signal by another 50 ns for a total of 150 ns from the original signal. More CSD modes may be defined in the future. These CSD modes are recommendations and not requirements. A specific manufacturer is free to utilize non-standard implementations. As such, a non-standard CSD mode may be defined based on a number of transmitters (e.g., 2, 3 or 4 transmitters) along with a temporal spacing (e.g., 50 ns, 100 ns, 150 ns, 200 ns).
As a result, RTT measurements may be skewed with false positive signals when CSD is enabled. Alternatively, multipath may appear as a multi-transmitter CSD mode signal when in fact CSD is disabled and only a signal transmitter is used. Without some other detection and correction processing, RTT measurements may select a first-to-arrive signal (having a transmitter advanced signal using cyclic shifting from a second or subsequent transmitter) rather than the last transmission (from the first transmitter).
Therefore, what is needed is a way to determine if CSD is enabled. Also, if enabled, what CSD mode is operational, thereby providing accurate RTT measurement that may be used for mobile device positioning.
Disclosed are systems, apparatus and methods for communicating and determining a CSD mode.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a method for communicating a cyclic shift diversity (CSD) mode using signaling, the method comprising: setting the CSD mode; and signaling, from an access point to a mobile device, the CSD mode.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a device for communicating a cyclic shift diversity (CSD) mode using signaling, the device comprising: a transceiver; and a processor coupled to the transceiver, the processor: to set the CSD mode; and to signal, from the device to a mobile device, the CSD mode.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a device for communicating a cyclic shift diversity (CSD) mode using signaling, the device comprising: means for setting the CSD mode; and means for signaling, from the device to a mobile device, the CSD mode.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a device comprising a processor and a memory wherein the memory includes software instructions for: setting a CSD mode; and signaling, from the device to a mobile device, the CSD mode.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium including program code stored thereon, comprising program code for: setting the CSD mode; and signaling, from a device to a mobile device, the CSD mode.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a method for determining a cyclic shift diversity (CSD) mode using signaling, the method comprising: receiving the CSD mode from an access point as a signaled message; wherein the CSD mode comprises a variable.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a mobile device for determining a cyclic shift diversity (CSD) mode using signaling, the device comprising: a transceiver; and a processor coupled to the transceiver, the processor: to receive the CSD mode from an access point as a signaled message; wherein the CSD mode comprises a variable.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a mobile device for determining a cyclic shift diversity (CSD) mode using signaling, the device comprising: means for receiving the CSD mode from an access point as a signaled message; wherein the CSD mode comprises a variable.
According to some aspects, disclosed is a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium including program code stored thereon, comprising program code for: receiving a CSD mode from an access point as a signaled message; wherein the CSD mode comprises a variable.
It is understood that other aspects will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein it is shown and described various aspects by way of illustration. The drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
Embodiments of the invention will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings.
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of various aspects of the present disclosure and is not intended to represent the only aspects in which the present disclosure may be practiced. Each aspect described in this disclosure is provided merely as an example or illustration of the present disclosure, and should not necessarily be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the concepts of the present disclosure. Acronyms and other descriptive terminology may be used merely for convenience and clarity and are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure.
Position determination techniques described herein may be implemented in conjunction with various wireless communication networks such as a wireless wide area network (WWAN), a wireless local area network (WLAN), a wireless personal area network (WPAN), and so on. The term “network” and “system” are often used interchangeably. A WWAN may be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) network, a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) network, a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) network, an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) network, a Single-Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) network, Long Term Evolution (LTE), and so on. A CDMA network may implement one or more radio access technologies (RATs) such as cdma2000, Wideband-CDMA (W-CDMA), and so on. Cdma2000 includes IS-95, IS-2000, and IS-856 standards. A TDMA network may implement Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Digital Advanced Mobile Phone System (D-AMPS), or some other RAT. GSM and W-CDMA are described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP). Cdma2000 is described in documents from a consortium named “3rd Generation Partnership Project 2” (3GPP2). 3GPP and 3GPP2 documents are publicly available. A WLAN may be an IEEE 802.11x network, and a WPAN may be a Bluetooth network, an IEEE 802.15x, or some other type of network. The techniques may also be implemented in conjunction with any combination of WWAN, WLAN and/or WPAN.
A satellite positioning system (SPS) typically includes a system of transmitters positioned to enable entities to determine their location on or above the Earth based, at least in part, on signals received from the transmitters. Such a transmitter typically transmits a signal marked with a repeating pseudo-random noise (PN) code of a set number of chips and may be located on ground based control stations, user equipment and/or space vehicles. In a particular example, such transmitters may be located on Earth orbiting satellite vehicles (SVs). For example, a SV in a constellation of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) such as Global Positioning System (GPS), Galileo, GLONASS or Compass may transmit a signal marked with a PN code that is distinguishable from PN codes transmitted by other SVs in the constellation (e.g., using different PN codes for each satellite as in GPS or using the same code on different frequencies as in GLONASS). In accordance with certain aspects, the techniques presented herein are not restricted to global systems (e.g., GNSS) for SPS. For example, the techniques provided herein may be applied to or otherwise enabled for use in various regional systems, such as, e.g., Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) over Japan, Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS) over India, Beidou over China, etc., and/or various augmentation systems (e.g., an Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS)) that may be associated with or otherwise enabled for use with one or more global and/or regional navigation satellite systems. By way of example but not limitation, an SBAS may include an augmentation system(s) that provides integrity information, differential corrections, etc., such as, e.g., Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS), Multi-functional Satellite Augmentation System (MSAS), GPS Aided Geo Augmented Navigation or GPS and Geo Augmented Navigation system (GAGAN), and/or the like. Thus, as used herein an SPS may include any combination of one or more global and/or regional navigation satellite systems and/or augmentation systems, and SPS signals may include SPS, SPS-like, and/or other signals associated with such one or more SPS.
As used herein, a mobile device, sometimes referred to as a mobile station (MS) or user equipment (UE), such as a cellular phone, mobile phone or other wireless communication device, personal communication system (PCS) device, personal navigation device (PND), Personal Information Manager (PIM), Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), laptop or other suitable mobile device which is capable of receiving wireless communication and/or navigation signals. The term “mobile station” is also intended to include devices which communicate with a personal navigation device (PND), such as by short-range wireless, infrared, wireline connection, or other connection—regardless of whether satellite signal reception, assistance data reception, and/or position-related processing occurs at the device or at the PND. Also, “mobile station” is intended to include all devices, including wireless communication devices, computers, laptops, etc. which are capable of communication with a server, such as via the Internet, WiFi, or other network, and regardless of whether satellite signal reception, assistance data reception, and/or position-related processing occurs at the device, at a server, or at another device associated with the network. Any operable combination of the above are also considered a “mobile device.”
Both delays indicative of range (namely, tUP and tDOWN) may be excluded from TCF 300. Therefore, the measured delay may be adjusted by TCF 300 to result in the signal travel time. That is, RTT measured−TCF=RTT. Finally, RTT may be converted to a range by computing the one-way time and adjusting for the speed of light (range=c*{RTT/2}, where c represents the speed of light and {RTT/2} represents the one-way time of signal travel).
In
In
In
In
The CSD mode may be represented by: (1) a CSD mode from the IEEE 802.11n specification; (2) a number of transmitters; (3) a cyclic shift (temporal) spacing between transmitters; (4) criteria for enabling/disabling a CSD mode; or (5) any combination of two or more of these representations (e.g., a number of transmitters plus a spacing between transmitters).
In
In
The signaling may be a unique and separate message or may be part of an existing message, such as part of an assistance data message. This signaling may originate in an access point, or alternatively, this signaling may originate from a server. A server may be instructed what CSD mode is currently being used, for example, by a network operator. Alternatively, crowd sourcing may be used to determine what CSD mode is currently being used.
As can be seen, a delay-based correlation does not take any cyclic shifting into consideration.
In
A worst case for multipath is multipath that cause two different received signals to be delayed by 200 ns, three different received signals to be delayed by 100 ns, or three different received signals to be delayed by 50 ns each. These versions of multipath appear as coming from a cyclic shift delay system and are considered below.
A multipath signal y(t) is considered.
A cyclic-shift signal y(t) is considered.
Therefore, by comparing the outputs of a delay-based autocorrelator and a cyclic shift-based autocorrelator, one may differentiate between a multipath signal and a cyclic shift signal. That is, when the autocorrelators differ above a threshold, a cyclic shift signal is received.
In sum, for purely multipath signals, the output of the delay-based autocorrelator is similar to the output of the cyclic shift-based autocorrelator. For purely cyclic-shift signals, however, the output of the delay-based autocorrelator significantly differs from the output of the cyclic shift-based autocorrelator. Once the difference is detected, the number of transmitters may be identified from the number of peaks (e.g., 2, 3 or 4) above a threshold in the output results from the cyclic-shift autocorrelator. The temporal difference between successive peaks identifies the cyclic-shift delay between signals (e.g., 50 ns, 100 ns or 200 ns).
The same analysis applied above to a two-path multipath signal and a CSD mode 2 signal is now applied to a three-path multipath signal and a CSD mode 3 signal.
A multipath signal y(t) having a direct path and two indirect paths is considered.
A cyclic-shift signal y(t) is considered.
In
Finally at 606, the processor computes a normalized delay-based autocorrelation, for example, as
In
Finally at 616, the processor computes a normalized delay-based autocorrelation, for example, as
The number of local maxima or peaks above a threshold in a channel impulse response determines the number of CSD transmitters. The temporal spacing of the CSD transmitters is determined by finding the time difference between these peaks. By tabulating the number of local peaks and their time spacing over time after several OFDM symbol periods, one may determine what CSD mode is currently being used.
The methodologies described herein may be implemented by various means depending upon the application. For example, these methodologies may be implemented in hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof. For a hardware implementation, the processing units may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, electronic devices, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
For a firmware and/or software implementation, the methodologies may be implemented with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the functions described herein. Any machine-readable medium tangibly embodying instructions may be used in implementing the methodologies described herein. For example, software codes may be stored in a memory and executed by a processor unit. Memory may be implemented within the processor unit or external to the processor unit. As used herein the term “memory” refers to any type of long term, short term, volatile, nonvolatile, or other memory and is not to be limited to any particular type of memory or number of memories, or type of media upon which memory is stored.
If implemented in firmware and/or software, the functions may be stored as one or more instructions or code on a computer-readable medium. Examples include computer-readable media encoded with a data structure and computer-readable media encoded with a computer program. Computer-readable media includes physical computer storage media. A storage medium may be any available medium that can be accessed by a computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media can comprise RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium that can be used to store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer; disk and disc, as used herein, includes compact disc (CD), laser disc, optical disc, digital versatile disc (DVD), floppy disk and Blu-ray disc where disks usually reproduce data magnetically, while discs reproduce data optically with lasers. Combinations of the above should also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
In addition to storage on computer readable medium, instructions and/or data may be provided as signals on transmission media included in a communication apparatus. For example, a communication apparatus may include a transceiver having signals indicative of instructions and data. The instructions and data are configured to cause one or more processors to implement the functions outlined in the claims. That is, the communication apparatus includes transmission media with signals indicative of information to perform disclosed functions. At a first time, the transmission media included in the communication apparatus may include a first portion of the information to perform the disclosed functions, while at a second time the transmission media included in the communication apparatus may include a second portion of the information to perform the disclosed functions.
The previous description of the disclosed aspects is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present disclosure. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other aspects without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7715867 | He | May 2010 | B2 |
7813330 | Yu et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7865153 | Khan | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7920599 | Subramanian et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8121211 | Lou | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8131228 | Liao | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8144683 | Sun et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8149942 | Wang et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8151156 | Lee | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8200264 | Kim | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8249613 | Liu | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8345790 | Sartori et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8483085 | Pan | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8515369 | Chae | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8620230 | Sanderovitz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8625561 | Zhang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8861394 | Han | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8937914 | Kwon | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9001907 | Chen | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9054761 | Lee | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059749 | Imamura | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9107207 | Sawai | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9154210 | Li | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9167589 | Takata | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20020126220 | Wilson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030058952 | Webster et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20050047515 | Walton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050107969 | Jitsukawa et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050163265 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050265477 | Takeda et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060221810 | Vrcelj et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070165726 | Ding et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206686 | Vook et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230403 | Douglas et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259693 | Brunel et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270273 | Fukuta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080037680 | Sakata et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080132282 | Liu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090116575 | Hochwald | May 2009 | A1 |
20090268685 | Chen | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100067599 | Dayal et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075693 | Kishigami | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091915 | Xu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103810 | Kloos et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100197264 | Azadet et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100273438 | Nishio et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100290553 | Li et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110075651 | Jia et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110117926 | Hwang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110142075 | Che et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159831 | Jiang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110280188 | Jeon et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110280349 | Hong et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110305178 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120057491 | Tiirola et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120087401 | Bhattad et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120087427 | Noh et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120177019 | Zhang | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130121392 | Thompson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128935 | Janani et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130136198 | Chavali et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130301551 | Ghosh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336144 | Azadet et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140086284 | Lakhzouri et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086369 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140153420 | Garin et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150236771 | Pan | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1383492 | Dec 2002 | CN |
101682384 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101848057 | Sep 2010 | CN |
102334320 | Jan 2012 | CN |
2151937 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2169863 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2007312380 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008048093 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2005055543 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005081481 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2008000069 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2010052673 | May 2010 | WO |
2010124448 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011040789 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
GSMA, “RCS-e—Advanced Communications: Services and Client Specification,” Version 1.2.2, Jul. 2012, 169 pages. |
Cisco, “802.11ac: The Fifth Generation of Wi-Fi,” Technical White Paper, Aug. 2012, pp. 1-25. |
Guerrero L., et al., “Performance Analysis of Distributed CDD MC-CDMA Sensor Networks with Frequency-Correlated Subcarriers over Nakagami-m Fading Channels”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2008. VTC Spring 2008, IEEE, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, May 11, 2008 (May 11, 2008), pp. 81-85, XP031255493, ISBN: 978-1-4244-1644-8. |
IEEE P802.11ac/D4.0, Draft STANDARD for Information Technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications, Amendment 4: Enhancements for Very High Throughput for Operation in Bands below 6 GHz., Oct. 2012, 408 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2012/056932—ISA/EPO—Jul. 22, 2013. |
Paul T.K., et al., “Evolution, insights and challenges of the PHY layer for the emerging ieee 802.11n amendment”, IEEE Commun icati ons Surveys, IEEE, New York, NY, US, vol. 11, No. 4, Oct. 1, 2009 (Oct. 1, 2009), pp. 131-150, XP011285647, ISSN: 1553-877X, 001: 10.1109/SURV.2009.090408. |
Plass S., et al., “An Overview of Cyclic Delay Diversity and its Applications”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2008. VTC 2008-Fall. IEEE 68th, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Sep. 21, 2008 (Sep. 21, 2008), pp. 1-5, XP031352316, ISBN: 978-1-4244-1721-6. |
Xu Y., et al., “Sampling Clock Offset Estimation Algorithm Based on IEEE 802. 11n”, Networking, Sensing and Control, 2008, ICNSC 2008, IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Apr. 6, 2008 (Apr. 6, 2008), pp. 523-527, XP031255223. |
Yao X., et al., “An improved channel detection method for IEEE 802.11N MIMO system”, Journal of Electronics (China), SP Science Press, Heidelberg, vol. 28, No. 4-6, Mar. 8, 2012 (Mar. 8, 2012), pp. 658-663, XP035024713, ISSN: 1993-0615, DOI: 10.1007/S11767-012-0788-9. |
Liang, Y.C., et al., “Design of cyclic delay diversity for single carrier cyclic prefix (SCCP) transmissions with block-iterative GDFE (BI-GDFE) receiver”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 7, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2008 (Feb. 1, 2008), pp. 677-684, XP011225080, ISSN: 1536-1276, DOI:10.1109/TWC.2008.060625 sections III and IV. |
Yuen, C., et al., “Comparative Study of Open-Loop Transmit Diversity Schemes for Four Transmit Antennas in Coded OFDM Systems”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall. 2007 IEEE 66th, IEEE, PI, Sep. 1, 2007 (Sep. 1, 2007), pp. 482-485, XP031147450, ISBN: 978-1-4244-0263-2, the whole document. |
Erceg V., et al., “IEEE P802.11 Wireless LANs, TGn Channel Models”, IEEE 802.11-03/940r4, May 10, 2004, pp. 45. |
Himayat N., et al., “System Performance of Transmit Diversity Schemes for Interference-Limited Cellular Systems,” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), Nov. 2007, pp. 4215-4220. |
“IEEE Standard for Information technology—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC)and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput” IEEE Std 802.11n-2009 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802 .11-2007), IEEE Standard, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Oct. 29, 2009 (Oct. 29, 2009), pp. 1-565, XP017694836, ISBN: 978-0-7381-6046-7. |
Zhou L., et al., “Channel Estimation of Multiple Transmit Antennas for OFDM Systems with Cyclic Delay Preamble,” IEEE 62nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC), 2005, pp. 583-587. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140087751 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |