Damper suitable for liquid aerosol-laden flow streams

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10480797
  • Patent Number
    10,480,797
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 31, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 19, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
A flow control device has a duct section with a plurality of damper blocking elements, each having a major plane. The damper blocking elements are pivotably connected to the duct section and movable in a range that is limited to ensure that, when the duct section is mounted in a preferred orientation, the damper blocking element major planes always form an angle of at least 45 degrees from the horizontal throughout the range. The range is such that the plurality of damper blocking elements can selectively close and open the duct. The blocking elements can completely close the duct, for example, to block natural convection.
Description
BACKGROUND

Exhaust hoods are used in many situations where pollutants are generated. Examples include kitchens, laboratories, factories, and spray paint booths, as well as other examples. In a commercial kitchen environment, multiple exhaust hoods and exhaust ducts may be provided for different appliances at different locations. The load varies with the type of appliance and the way it is being used. Broilers, grills, and fryers, for example, may produce a great deal of smoke and fumes, including grease particles and moisture. Other devices such as ovens and steam tables may produce less. To provide sufficient flow to remove pollutants without removing excessive amounts of air creates a real time flow balancing problem in the commercial kitchen environment. Typical exhaust hoods and ducting systems may be ill-suited to addressing this problem in an optimum way.


A typical exhaust hood has an inlet for fumes and air that leads to an exhaust duct. Filters may be provided at the point where air and fumes enter the duct. An exhaust plenum may also connect the hood with the exhaust duct. Hoods are often long and narrow and accommodate multiple cooking units. Variations include exhaust ceilings, wide canopy hoods, and other configurations.


Prior art systems have used flow restrictions in the path of the exhaust air to balance the flow of air and fumes. Dampers or other chokes may be used to make adjustments to the flow and real time control systems have been proposed. But fouling is a persistent problem particularly in systems that handle fumes and air with water vapor and grease particles.


SUMMARY

Generally, the invention is a blocking mechanism that has surfaces, which may or may not be planar, in which the surfaces of the blocking elements remain at angles that form angles greater than 30 degrees from the horizontal and preferably more than 30 degrees such as more than 45 degrees. Balancing dampers suitable for use in ducts carrying grease laden fumes have generally air blocking elements that move between high resistance and low resistance positions to regulate the amount of grease-laden fumes that pass through the duct.


A flow control device has a duct section with a plurality of damper blocking elements, each having a major plane. The damper blocking elements are pivotably connected to the duct section and movable in a range that is limited to ensure that, when the duct section is mounted in a preferred orientation, the damper blocking element major planes always form an angle of at least 45 degrees from the horizontal throughout the range. The range is such that the plurality of damper blocking elements can selectively close and open the duct. Preferably the blocking elements are capable of completely closing the duct, for example to block natural convection. In a variation, there are two damper blocking elements. The damper blocking elements may be configured such that they are interconnected to pivot in opposite directions and further such that edges thereof meet in the middle of the duct section when the blocking elements are in a closed position. For example, in a preferred configuration, the major planes are substantially vertical when the blocking elements are in the open position.


The blocking elements can be configured each with a flat portion, such as by means of a bend in a plate, that come into parallel abutment with each other when the blocking elements are in the closed position. The damper blocking elements pivot on bearings mounted outside the duct section. Preferably the bearings are durable and low resistance bearings such as roller or ball bearings to allow the damper to be used continuously and adjusted frequently throughout the day over a long lifetime without sticking or breaking down.


The blocking elements may be carried on shafts which are mounted to the bearings, and liquid proof seals located at the duct walls may be provided that permit the shafts to rotate while preventing fluid in the duct from escaping to the outside of the duct. The duct may be sealed against fluid within the duct escaping the duct section. The damper blocking elements pivot on bearings mounted inside the duct on one side of the duct and mounted outside the duct on the opposite side of the duct such the one side has no protrusions. A motor drive may be located on the opposite side so that the side with the bearing on the inside can present a flush outer face.


A motor drive may be configured to position the damper blocking elements and a controller configured to control the motor drive responsively to a detected fume load. The controller may be configured to control the motor drive responsively to a fume load detected by at least one of a gas sensor, an optical sensor, a temperature sensor, and a flow sensor.


Any of the foregoing variations may be applied to another flow control device with a duct section that has a plurality of damper blocking elements, each having a major plane. In this device, the damper blocking elements pivot on bearings connected to the duct section and are movable from an open position in which the blocking elements are in a vertical position in which the major planes are spaced apart and parallel to closed position in which the major planes form an angle of at least 45 degrees with the horizontal. The range is such that the plurality of damper blocking elements can selectively substantially close the duct section completely and open the duct section completely.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a balancing damper.



FIGS. 2A-2D are figurative views of the balancing damper blade positions in various stages of adjustment.



FIG. 3 shows the blades of a balancing damper.



FIG. 4A shows a partial section view of a balancing damper assembly.



FIG. 4B shows a perspective view of a balancing damper.



FIGS. 5A-5D show alternative damper blade configurations and mechanisms.



FIGS. 6A and 6B show another alternative blade configuration.



FIG. 7 shows a damper unit mounted in a duct of an exhaust hood and various associated features.



FIG. 8 shows a configuration of a damper with trough shaped blades.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, a balancing damper in a duct segment 100 that carries grease laden fumes has two generally air blocking elements 102 and 112 that rotate on bearings 108A and 108B. As illustrated in FIGS. 2A to 2D, the blocking elements 102 and 112 rotate symmetrically between settings for high resistance 90, low resistance 93, and a range of positions in-between including those indicated at 91 and 92 positions.


Note that in all of the positions shown, the blocking elements 102 and 112 remain at a minimum angle with respect to the horizontal 80 of more than about 45 degrees, for example, end portions 113 of blocking elements 102 and 112 as well as the major portions 115 all form angles, such as angles ϕ1 and ϕ2. For example the minimum angle can be at least about 45 degrees, the closed position being the least vertical.


A motor drive 104 may be used to rotate the blocking elements 102 and 112. The drive 104 may include an indicator 114 that shows the position of the damper. The drive 104 may be replaced by a manual positioning device. A synchronization mechanism, such as a kinematic mechanism (for example, one using linkages including the links 106 and 109) may be provided to cause the blocking elements 102 and 112 to pivot back and forth in synchrony. Such a kinematic mechanism could employ gears, hydraulic couplings, electronically synchronized drives or any suitable mechanism.


The blocking elements may be planar or any other suitable shape. The embodiment of FIG. 1 may be modified to fit in a round duct with blocking elements shaped as cylindrical sections to permit the same overall effect as the embodiment of FIG. 1.


Preferably, bearings are provided, such as bearings 108a and 108b, to support the blocking elements 102 and 112 for pivoting. The bearings may be located inside the duct section 100 or outside. In one configuration, bearings may be located on the inside on a side of the duct opposite the drive motor and on the outside on the side with the drive motor. In the latter configuration, the duct can be located with the side opposite the drive motor lying directly against the wall. Referring to FIG. 4A, where the bearings are located outside as indicated by 180, the duct section may have a housing 144 to enclose the external bearing. The bearings may also be provided with a seal 184 to ensure that gas, grease or condensed vapor or any other liquid cannot leak from the duct. FIG. 4B illustrates a configuration in which a housing 150 encloses a drive 155 as well as the externally-mounted bearing. Bearings 182 inside the duct may be constructed, as shown in FIG. 4A, such that no duct wall penetration is required. Preferably, a notch 172 in blocking element 102 provides clearance for any internal bearing.


As illustrated, one end of each blocking element 102 and 112 may have a bend at the end. This may enhance rigidity and also help to act as a stop to prevent the blocking elements pivoting too far. Such features may be provided on one or both ends or not at all. FIG. 3 shows the damper with the duct section 100 removed. FIGS. 5A to 5D show alternative mechanisms. FIGS. 5A and 5B show blocking elements 202 and 204 that pivot at their ends. In other configurations, the pivot location may be anywhere along the blocking elements. As in the other configurations, the blocking elements are partially vertical, preferably at least 45 degrees to the horizontal, in the closed position (FIG. 5a) and more vertical in the open position (FIG. 5b), to help prevent the accumulation of grease by encouraging grease to drip quickly off the blocking elements 202 and 204. A linkage 206, which may be located outside the duct 100, causes the blocking elements 202 and 204 to move in synchrony. An embodiment of FIGS. 5C and 5D has blocking elements 208 and 210 configured for a round duct 100A.



FIGS. 6A and 6B show closed and open positions, respectively, of a mechanism with a single blocking element 220 that pivots at 224. As in the above embodiments, in the closed position, the blocking element 220 forms a substantial minimum angle with the horizontal. In this and other embodiments the minimum angles are as discussed above with regard to the other embodiments.


The above embodiments may be varied in terms of details, such as the shape of the blocking elements and the angle formed by the blocking elements in all positions, even the closed position. For example, although in the above embodiments, the blocking elements form a 45 degree angle, a greater or smaller angle may be used. In preferred embodiments, the angle is at least 30 degrees from the horizontal. In more preferred embodiments, the angle is at least 40 degrees, and more preferably 45 degrees to the horizontal. In alternative embodiments, the angle is greater than 45 degrees to the horizontal.


Note in the above embodiments that the blocking elements have bent portions at one or more edges. These also form substantial angles with the horizontal in all positions. Preferably the angles are greater than 45 degrees.



FIG. 8 shows a damper configuration 160 with damper blocking elements that are trough shaped with bends 164 providing rigidity and no bends on the upstream 166 and downstream 162 edges. The bends 164 can extend the entire distance between the edges 162 and 166 or they can be interrupted, as shown, at one or more points along that distance.


Referring to FIG. 7, preferably, grease conveyance 314 is provided below the damper 300 to carry grease that drips from the damper unit 300. FIG. 7 shows the damper unit 300 mounted in a duct 316 of an exhaust hood 318 above an exhaust plenum 310. The exhaust hood 318 is mounted over an appliance 320 that emits fumes. A controller 324 controls the damper unit 300 responsively to an indicator 312 which indicates the conditions of the exhaust stream or the operational state of the appliance 320. In a preferred configuration, when the appliance 320 is on, the damper 300 is controlled by a controller 324 such that it never fully closes and continues to drain grease generated by the appliance back into the hood grease conveyance or the plenum, depending on the configuration. However, when the appliance is off, the damper fully closes to seal the ductwork to prevent outside air from getting pulled back into the ductwork and into the interior space in which the exhaust hood 318 is located. It is believed that this provides the benefit of reducing the load on any space conditioning system responsible for maintaining enthalpy conditions in the interior space. The indicator 312 may include a cooking sensor (such as an infrared sensor, direct communication with the appliances, etc.), gas sensor, opacity sensor, temperature sensor or any device that can indicate whether exhaust flow is required to eliminate fumes. Loads can be detected in other indirect ways, for example by detecting the fuel or electricity consumed by an appliance, the time of day, or the number of orders placed for cooked food.


U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,170,480 and 6,899,095, which are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth in their entireties herein, illustrate various ways to detect the amount of fumes in an exhaust system that may be used to control the damper units of the above embodiments. These documents also discuss applications for a damper, such as balancing of hoods mounted to a common exhaust. The embodiments of the invention can be used with these applications.


It is, therefore, apparent that there is provided, in accordance with the present disclosure, a damper suitable for liquid aerosol-laden flow streams and associated methods. Many alternatives, modifications, and variations are enabled by the present disclosure. Features of the disclosed embodiments can be combined, rearranged, omitted, etc. within the scope of the invention to produce additional embodiments. Furthermore, certain features of the disclosed embodiments may sometimes be used to advantage without a corresponding use of other features. Accordingly, Applicants intend to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents, and variations that are within the spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims
  • 1. An exhaust system comprising: an exhaust hood having a recess constructed to capture fumes from a fume source;a duct section coupled to the exhaust hood so as to receive captured fumes therefrom, the duct section having a cross-section and a flow direction perpendicular to said cross-section;a flow control device having a plurality of damper blocking elements disposed in the duct section, each of the damper blocking elements having a major plane;a fume load sensor configured to detect a fume load in the duct section;a motor drive which positions the damper blocking elements;a first bearing and a second bearing supporting a rotation axle of at least one of the plurality of damper blocking elements, the first bearing disposed outside the duct section and the second bearing disposed inside the duct section;a seal surrounding at least a portion of the rotation axle that penetrates through a wall of the duct section; anda controller coupled to the motor drive and configured to control the motor drive responsively to the fume load detected by the fume load sensor, whereineach damper blocking element is movable in a respective range from a first position, where the duct section is substantially closed in the flow direction by the damper blocking elements, to a second position, where the duct section is substantially open in the flow direction,the controller further being configured to detect, responsively to said fume load sensor, when the fume source is off and when the fume source is on and to substantially close the plurality of damper blocking elements when the fume source is off to prevent air from flowing through said flow control device when the fume source is off, the controller controlling the flow control devices such that it never fully closes when the fume source is on, andeach of the damper blocking elements has a rigid construction that maintains its shape.
  • 2. The exhaust system of claim 1, wherein the flow direction is parallel to vertical, and the plane parallel to said cross-section is horizontal.
  • 3. The exhaust system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of damper blocking elements is two damper blocking elements, which are interconnected to pivot in opposite directions such that edges thereof meet in the middle of the duct section when the damper blocking elements are at their respective first positions.
  • 4. The exhaust system of claim 1, wherein each blocking element has a flat portion that comes into parallel abutment with the flat portion of the other blocking element when said two blocking elements are at their respective first positions.
  • 5. The exhaust system of claim 1, wherein the fume load sensor comprises at least one of a gas sensor, an optical sensor, a temperature sensor, and a flow sensor.
  • 6. A system comprising: an exhaust hood arranged above a fume source in a vertical direction so as to capture fumes from the fume source;a duct connected to the exhaust hood that conveys the fumes captured by the exhaust hood, the duct having a first wall and an opposed second wall;a flow control device disposed in the duct, the flow control device comprising a plurality of dampers, each of the dampers having a major plane, the dampers being pivotably connected to a drive mechanism configured to pivot the dampers within the duct through a range of rotation;the drive mechanism including a shaft penetrating through the first wall but not the second wall of the duct and connected to at least one of the dampers to provide a rotation axis for said at least one of the dampers,a motor drive located outside the duct and configured to rotate the shaft, anda first bearing assembly positioned outside the duct and supporting a first end of the shaft so that the first end of the shaft pivots on bearings within the first bearing assembly;at least one sensor that detects a fume load captured by the exhaust hood; anda controller configured to control the motor drive responsively to a fume load detected by the at least one sensor, whereineach of the damper blocking elements has a rigid construction that maintains its shape.
  • 7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the first bearing assembly is positioned on a surface of the first wall, outside of the duct.
  • 8. The system according to claim 6, further comprising: a second bearing assembly positioned on the second wall, inside the duct, supporting a second end of the shaft so that the second end of the shaft pivots on bearings within the second bearing assembly.
  • 9. The system according to claim 8, wherein the at least one of the dampers includes a first edge adjacent to the first wall;a second edge adjacent to the second wall; anda notch in the second edge.
  • 10. The system according to claim 9, wherein the second bearing assembly protrudes into the notch.
  • 11. The system of claim 9, wherein the plurality of dampers is two dampers.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the two dampers are interconnected to pivot in opposite directions such that edges thereof meet in the middle of the duct when the dampers are in a closed position and such that the major planes are substantially vertical when the dampers are in an open position.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the dampers have flat portions that come into parallel abutment with each other when the dampers are in the closed position.
  • 14. The system according to claim 6, further comprising: an opening in the first wall larger than a cross-sectional area of the shaft; anda liquid-proof seal within said opening, wherein the liquid-proof seal reduces or prevents liquids from escaping from the duct along the shaft penetrating through the first wall.
  • 15. The system according to claim 6, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a gas sensor, an optical sensor, a temperature sensor, or a flow sensor; andthe controller is configured to control the motor drive responsively to a fume load detected by the at least one sensor, the controller further being configured to detect when the fume source is off and when the fume source is on responsively to said at least one sensor and to substantially close the plurality of dampers when the fume source is off to prevent air from flowing through said flow control device when the fume source is off, the controller controlling the flow control device such that it never fully closes when the fume source is on.
  • 16. The system of claim 6, wherein the range of rotation is limited such that gravity causes any grease from the captured fumes that accumulates on surfaces of the dampers to drip back to the exhaust hood.
  • 17. The system according to claim 16, further comprising: a grease collection conveyance positioned inside the exhaust hood and vertically below the flow control device.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/788,625, filed Jun. 30, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/248,261, filed Oct. 9, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/978,606, filed Oct. 9, 2007, all of which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (65)
Number Name Date Kind
594727 Cooper Nov 1897 A
2846934 Mauldin Aug 1958 A
3323439 Weaver et al. Jun 1967 A
3591150 Weatherston Jul 1971 A
3941039 Kinney Mar 1976 A
3958605 Nishizu et al. May 1976 A
3967642 Logsdon Jul 1976 A
4066064 Vandas Jan 1978 A
4091835 Frampton May 1978 A
4130111 Ristic Dec 1978 A
4276817 Meckler Jul 1981 A
4552059 Potter Nov 1985 A
4633900 Suzuki Jan 1987 A
4738243 Welsh et al. Apr 1988 A
4784114 Muckler et al. Nov 1988 A
4902316 Giles et al. Feb 1990 A
4903894 Pellinen et al. Feb 1990 A
4912338 Bingham Mar 1990 A
5042456 Cote Aug 1991 A
5251608 Cote Oct 1993 A
5394861 Stegmaier Mar 1995 A
5421320 Brown Jun 1995 A
5673681 Neitzel et al. Oct 1997 A
5771879 Saltzman Jun 1998 A
5915960 Check et al. Jun 1999 A
5988131 Hernandez Nov 1999 A
6125841 Boudreault Oct 2000 A
6170480 Melink et al. Jan 2001 B1
6173710 Gibson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6237625 Randolph May 2001 B1
6349716 Morton Feb 2002 B1
6584968 Morton Jul 2003 B1
6708949 Twito Mar 2004 B2
6779735 Onstott Aug 2004 B1
6851421 Livchak et al. Feb 2005 B2
6866033 Stacy et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869468 Gibson Mar 2005 B2
6878195 Gibson Apr 2005 B2
6899095 Livchak et al. May 2005 B2
7114519 Aitchison et al. Oct 2006 B2
7147168 Bagwell et al. Dec 2006 B1
7231967 Haglid Jun 2007 B2
7364094 Bagwell et al. Apr 2008 B2
7582009 Côté Sep 2009 B1
7699051 Gagas et al. Apr 2010 B2
7775865 Livchak et al. Aug 2010 B2
7836877 Gagas et al. Nov 2010 B2
8006685 Bolton et al. Aug 2011 B2
8025077 Lubawy Sep 2011 B2
8038515 Livchak et al. Oct 2011 B2
20020134371 Ward et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030140968 Chang Jul 2003 A1
20030146082 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 A1
20050115557 Meredith et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050116114 Aitchison et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050229922 Magner et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050279845 Bagwell et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060032492 Bagwell et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060219235 Bagwell et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070015449 Livchak Jan 2007 A1
20070023349 Kyllonen et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070068509 Bagwell et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070272230 Meredith et al. Nov 2007 A9
20080045132 Livchak et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080207109 Bagwell et al. Aug 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
0874199 Oct 1998 EP
2270638 Mar 1994 GB
1997048479 Dec 1997 WO
2001051857 Jul 2001 WO
2002014728 Feb 2002 WO
2002014746 Feb 2002 WO
2005019736 Mar 2005 WO
2005114059 Dec 2005 WO
2006002190 Jan 2006 WO
2006012628 Feb 2006 WO
2006074420 Jul 2006 WO
2006074425 Jul 2006 WO
2007112301 Oct 2007 WO
2007121461 Oct 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,640,840 dated Sep. 18, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170328578 A1 Nov 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60978606 Oct 2007 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14788625 Jun 2015 US
Child 15665193 US
Parent 12248261 Oct 2008 US
Child 14788625 US