Exhaust hoods are used in many situations where pollutants are generated. Examples include kitchens, laboratories, factories, and spray paint booths, as well as other examples. In a commercial kitchen environment, multiple exhaust hoods and exhaust ducts may be provided for different appliances at different locations. The load varies with the type of appliance and the way it is being used. Broilers, grills, and fryers, for example, may produce a great deal of smoke and fumes, including grease particles and moisture. Other devices such as ovens and steam tables may produce less. To provide sufficient flow to remove pollutants without removing excessive amounts of air creates a real time flow balancing problem in the commercial kitchen environment. Typical exhaust hoods and ducting systems may be ill-suited to addressing this problem in an optimum way.
A typical exhaust hood has an inlet for fumes and air that leads to an exhaust duct. Filters may be provided at the point where air and fumes enter the duct. An exhaust plenum may also connect the hood with the exhaust duct. Hoods are often long and narrow and accommodate multiple cooking units. Variations include exhaust ceilings, wide canopy hoods, and other configurations.
Prior art systems have used flow restrictions in the path of the exhaust air to balance the flow of air and fumes. Dampers or other chokes may be used to make adjustments to the flow and real time control systems have been proposed. But fouling is a persistent problem particularly in systems that handle fumes and air with water vapor and grease particles.
Generally, the invention is a blocking mechanism that has surfaces, which may or may not be planar, in which the surfaces of the blocking elements remain at angles that form angles greater than 30 degrees from the horizontal and preferably more than 30 degrees such as more than 45 degrees. Balancing dampers suitable for use in ducts carrying grease laden fumes have generally air blocking elements that move between high resistance and low resistance positions to regulate the amount of grease-laden fumes that pass through the duct.
A flow control device has a duct section with a plurality of damper blocking elements, each having a major plane. The damper blocking elements are pivotably connected to the duct section and movable in a range that is limited to ensure that, when the duct section is mounted in a preferred orientation, the damper blocking element major planes always form an angle of at least 45 degrees from the horizontal throughout the range. The range is such that the plurality of damper blocking elements can selectively close and open the duct. Preferably the blocking elements are capable of completely closing the duct, for example to block natural convection. In a variation, there are two damper blocking elements. The damper blocking elements may be configured such that they are interconnected to pivot in opposite directions and further such that edges thereof meet in the middle of the duct section when the blocking elements are in a closed position. For example, in a preferred configuration, the major planes are substantially vertical when the blocking elements are in the open position.
The blocking elements can be configured each with a flat portion, such as by means of a bend in a plate, that come into parallel abutment with each other when the blocking elements are in the closed position. The damper blocking elements pivot on bearings mounted outside the duct section. Preferably the bearings are durable and low resistance bearings such as roller or ball bearings to allow the damper to be used continuously and adjusted frequently throughout the day over a long lifetime without sticking or breaking down.
The blocking elements may be carried on shafts which are mounted to the bearings, and liquid proof seals located at the duct walls may be provided that permit the shafts to rotate while preventing fluid in the duct from escaping to the outside of the duct. The duct may be sealed against fluid within the duct escaping the duct section. The damper blocking elements pivot on bearings mounted inside the duct on one side of the duct and mounted outside the duct on the opposite side of the duct such the one side has no protrusions. A motor drive may be located on the opposite side so that the side with the bearing on the inside can present a flush outer face.
A motor drive may be configured to position the damper blocking elements and a controller configured to control the motor drive responsively to a detected fume load. The controller may be configured to control the motor drive responsively to a fume load detected by at least one of a gas sensor, an optical sensor, a temperature sensor, and a flow sensor.
Any of the foregoing variations may be applied to another flow control device with a duct section that has a plurality of damper blocking elements, each having a major plane. In this device, the damper blocking elements pivot on bearings connected to the duct section and are movable from an open position in which the blocking elements are in a vertical position in which the major planes are spaced apart and parallel to closed position in which the major planes form an angle of at least 45 degrees with the horizontal. The range is such that the plurality of damper blocking elements can selectively substantially close the duct section completely and open the duct section completely.
Referring to
Note that in all of the positions shown, the blocking elements 102 and 112 remain at a minimum angle with respect to the horizontal 80 of more than about 45 degrees, for example, end portions 113 of blocking elements 102 and 112 as well as the major portions 115 all form angles, such as angles ϕ1 and ϕ2. For example the minimum angle can be at least about 45 degrees, the closed position being the least vertical.
A motor drive 104 may be used to rotate the blocking elements 102 and 112. The drive 104 may include an indicator 114 that shows the position of the damper. The drive 104 may be replaced by a manual positioning device. A synchronization mechanism, such as a kinematic mechanism (for example, one using linkages including the links 106 and 109) may be provided to cause the blocking elements 102 and 112 to pivot back and forth in synchrony. Such a kinematic mechanism could employ gears, hydraulic couplings, electronically synchronized drives or any suitable mechanism.
The blocking elements may be planar or any other suitable shape. The embodiment of
Preferably, bearings are provided, such as bearings 108a and 108b, to support the blocking elements 102 and 112 for pivoting. The bearings may be located inside the duct section 100 or outside. In one configuration, bearings may be located on the inside on a side of the duct opposite the drive motor and on the outside on the side with the drive motor. In the latter configuration, the duct can be located with the side opposite the drive motor lying directly against the wall. Referring to
As illustrated, one end of each blocking element 102 and 112 may have a bend at the end. This may enhance rigidity and also help to act as a stop to prevent the blocking elements pivoting too far. Such features may be provided on one or both ends or not at all.
The above embodiments may be varied in terms of details, such as the shape of the blocking elements and the angle formed by the blocking elements in all positions, even the closed position. For example, although in the above embodiments, the blocking elements form a 45 degree angle, a greater or smaller angle may be used. In preferred embodiments, the angle is at least 30 degrees from the horizontal. In more preferred embodiments, the angle is at least 40 degrees, and more preferably 45 degrees to the horizontal. In alternative embodiments, the angle is greater than 45 degrees to the horizontal.
Note in the above embodiments that the blocking elements have bent portions at one or more edges. These also form substantial angles with the horizontal in all positions. Preferably the angles are greater than 45 degrees.
Referring to
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,170,480 and 6,899,095, which are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth in their entireties herein, illustrate various ways to detect the amount of fumes in an exhaust system that may be used to control the damper units of the above embodiments. These documents also discuss applications for a damper, such as balancing of hoods mounted to a common exhaust. The embodiments of the invention can be used with these applications.
It is, therefore, apparent that there is provided, in accordance with the present disclosure, a damper suitable for liquid aerosol-laden flow streams and associated methods. Many alternatives, modifications, and variations are enabled by the present disclosure. Features of the disclosed embodiments can be combined, rearranged, omitted, etc. within the scope of the invention to produce additional embodiments. Furthermore, certain features of the disclosed embodiments may sometimes be used to advantage without a corresponding use of other features. Accordingly, Applicants intend to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, equivalents, and variations that are within the spirit and scope of this invention.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/788,625, filed Jun. 30, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/248,261, filed Oct. 9, 2008, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/978,606, filed Oct. 9, 2007, all of which applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
594727 | Cooper | Nov 1897 | A |
2846934 | Mauldin | Aug 1958 | A |
3323439 | Weaver et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
3591150 | Weatherston | Jul 1971 | A |
3941039 | Kinney | Mar 1976 | A |
3958605 | Nishizu et al. | May 1976 | A |
3967642 | Logsdon | Jul 1976 | A |
4066064 | Vandas | Jan 1978 | A |
4091835 | Frampton | May 1978 | A |
4130111 | Ristic | Dec 1978 | A |
4276817 | Meckler | Jul 1981 | A |
4552059 | Potter | Nov 1985 | A |
4633900 | Suzuki | Jan 1987 | A |
4738243 | Welsh et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4784114 | Muckler et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4902316 | Giles et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4903894 | Pellinen et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4912338 | Bingham | Mar 1990 | A |
5042456 | Cote | Aug 1991 | A |
5251608 | Cote | Oct 1993 | A |
5394861 | Stegmaier | Mar 1995 | A |
5421320 | Brown | Jun 1995 | A |
5673681 | Neitzel et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5771879 | Saltzman | Jun 1998 | A |
5915960 | Check et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5988131 | Hernandez | Nov 1999 | A |
6125841 | Boudreault | Oct 2000 | A |
6170480 | Melink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173710 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6237625 | Randolph | May 2001 | B1 |
6349716 | Morton | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6584968 | Morton | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6708949 | Twito | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6779735 | Onstott | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6851421 | Livchak et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6866033 | Stacy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869468 | Gibson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6878195 | Gibson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6899095 | Livchak et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7114519 | Aitchison et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7147168 | Bagwell et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7231967 | Haglid | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7364094 | Bagwell et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7582009 | Côté | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7699051 | Gagas et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7775865 | Livchak et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7836877 | Gagas et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8006685 | Bolton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8025077 | Lubawy | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8038515 | Livchak et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
20020134371 | Ward et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030140968 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030146082 | Gibson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050115557 | Meredith et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050116114 | Aitchison et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050229922 | Magner et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050279845 | Bagwell et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032492 | Bagwell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060219235 | Bagwell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070015449 | Livchak | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023349 | Kyllonen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070068509 | Bagwell et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070272230 | Meredith et al. | Nov 2007 | A9 |
20080045132 | Livchak et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080207109 | Bagwell et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0874199 | Oct 1998 | EP |
2270638 | Mar 1994 | GB |
1997048479 | Dec 1997 | WO |
2001051857 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2002014728 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2002014746 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2005019736 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005114059 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006002190 | Jan 2006 | WO |
2006012628 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2006074420 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006074425 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2007112301 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007121461 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,640,840 dated Sep. 18, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170328578 A1 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60978606 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14788625 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15665193 | US | |
Parent | 12248261 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 14788625 | US |