The invention relates in general to communication between non-destructive testing devices and the cloud, and in particular to a method of selecting the location of an appropriate data storage center for a device registered to a cloud user account.
Industrial measurement devices, such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF) or ultrasound devices, are often used by enterprises which deploy multiple devices worldwide in multiple different geographic locations. A device which is communicating with the cloud may transmit or receive data from a data center anywhere in the world, and in existing practice the user has no control over the geographic location of the data center.
A first problem arising from such lack of user control is that there may be local government privacy laws or corporate rules of confidentiality which the user and/or the enterprise are required to adhere to. For example, it may be necessary for the data center to be in the same country as the device or to be a particular data center selected by a client. The rules or regulations pertaining to the data center location may be different depending on the country, on the type of device and/or on the method of communication with the cloud.
A second problem arising from lack of user control over the location of the data center is that a data center remote from the device location may result in communication delays, while a data center close to the device may provide a better user experience.
There therefore exists a need for a method of allowing the user to specify a particular data center or a particular geographic location of the data center to which the industrial measurement device will connect for transmitting or receiving data.
Accordingly, it is a general objective of the present disclosure to provide a system and method of allowing the user to specify a particular selected data center or a particular geographic location of the selected data center to which an industrial measurement device will connect for transmitting or receiving data.
It is a further objective to provide a system and method enabling the user to configure communication features for communication between the device and the selected data center.
It is a further objective to ensure that the data center is selected in accordance with any government, corporate or other regulations which pertain to the type of industrial measurement device, its geographic location and the geographic location of the selected data center.
For the case of a user who has already created an account but wishes to register a device, the start of the method is at step 32. For the case of a user who has already registered the device but wishes to change the device configuration, the start of the method is at step 36.
Note that the user interface of
When a user wishes to create an account (step 31,
Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, it can be appreciated that various designs can be conceived based on the teachings of the present disclosure, and all are within the scope of the present disclosure.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/995,953 filed Aug. 18, 2020, entitled DATA CENTER SELECTION FOR COMMUNICATION WITH AN INDUSTRIAL TESTING DEVICE, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/941,656 filed Mar. 30, 2018 and issued on Sep. 22, 2020 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,785,303 entitled DATA CENTER SELECTION FOR COMMUNICATION WITH AN INDUSTRIAL TESTING DEVICE, which claims the benefit and priority of U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/488,236 filed Apr. 21, 2017 entitled DATA STORAGE LOCALIZATION SELECTION FOR NDT INSPECTION, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7428750 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7941669 | Foley et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8125311 | Takimoto et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8457990 | Reicher et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8527633 | Bade et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8676593 | Nagpal et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9300539 | Dejana et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9374228 | Pendarakis et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9569476 | Dejana et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9943290 | Jin et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10192032 | Himsl et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10721166 | Barnes et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10785303 | Ghabour | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10826881 | Broussard et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
11223684 | Ghabour | Jan 2022 | B2 |
20020023059 | Bari et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030009102 | Quistgaard et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040141661 | Hanna et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080208046 | Pierce | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100058064 | Kirovski et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100325191 | Jung et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130036217 | Dejana et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20150338858 | Bates et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150347701 | Atkin | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160100824 | Kim | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160269236 | Chan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170286046 | Pardi | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180199920 | Jin et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180271483 | Nikoozadeh et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180309828 | Ghabour | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20200382593 | Ghabour | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3147655 | Mar 2017 | EP |
3393105 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3393105 | Feb 2020 | EP |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,656, Advisory Action dated Apr. 22, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,656, Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,656, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2019”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,656, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 15, 2020”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,656, Response filed Feb. 3, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2019”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/941,656, Response filed Apr. 9, 2020 to Final Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2020”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,953, Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2021”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,953, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2021”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,953, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 10, 2021”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,953, Response filed Jun. 24, 2021 to Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2021”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/995,953, Response filed Aug. 30, 2021 to Final Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2021”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18166872.4, Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 22, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18166872.4, Intention to Grant dated Oct. 4, 2019”, 21 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18166872.4, Response filed Apr. 20, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 22, 2018”, 20 pgs. |
Hafiz, Zahid, et al., “Comparative Study of Authentication Techniques”, International Journal of Video & Image Processing and Network Security (IJVIPNS-IJENS), vol. 10, No. 04, (Aug. 2010), 5 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220103637 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62488236 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16995953 | Aug 2020 | US |
Child | 17545227 | US | |
Parent | 15941656 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16995953 | US |