1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to financial data processing and business practices regarding funds transfer. More specifically, the present invention provides a personal payment number (PPN) wherein an individual or business can receive payments from other individuals or businesses without revealing confidential account information or establishing themselves as a credit/debit card accepting merchant.
2) Brief Description of Related Art
With the increasing globalization of commerce the need for safe and secure ways to make payments between individuals, businesses and merchants now extends to systems that provide global coverage and include currency exchange systems. In addition there is a need for these systems to be secure and also to be trusted by all parties.
Existing systems such as systems based on bank checks or bank transfers involve either the payer or the payee revealing details about their bank account to at least the other party. For instance, the recipient of a check sees the payer's bank account and routing information on the check, and with a bank transfer the recipient/payee must provide their account information to the sender/payer. In a global situation where the two parties may have never have met, sharing of such information may be sufficient cause for concern to deter one or other party from proceeding. Also, different checking and bank transfer systems can reduce the effectiveness of the financial transaction.
The global credit/debit card system provides an ideal mechanism for receiving payment but under normal circumstances requires the recipient to be a credit card accepting merchant. Being a credit card accepting merchant may not be cost-effective for some people or businesses wanting receiving payments. Also smaller merchants without a good trading history may have difficulty in being accepted by credit card acquiring banks as credit card accepting merchants.
The ability to receive funds using a simple, rapid and secure system without the need to be a formal credit card accepting merchant will be of benefit to a wide range of users. For example the rise of online auction services (such as those developed by eBay and Amazon) means that many individuals may occasionally require a means of receiving funds remotely, such as over the Internet. Also, the widespread “shareware” software distribution system provides a mechanism for software written by individuals to be distributed on a global basis. Shareware authors are generally individuals that do not have the organizational support to handle global payments. Therefore a system that can provide a global payment solution with no administrative overheads with automatic currency conversion would be very attractive to these as well as many other users.
In the growing global electronic commerce environment many individuals and companies may offer their service remotely over the Internet or other public, semipublic or closed network. Such services (programming, translation, writing, clerical, accounting, web-page design, etc) will typically be provided remotely and not require any direct physical interaction between the provider of the service and the service user. The two parties to such an arrangement may never have met raising the issue of mutual trust. In addition they may be in different countries and this produces problems for currency exchange or incompatibility of bank transfer systems as well legal challenges if a non-payment dispute arises. Again a simple, rapid global payment solution would be of benefit.
The need and value of such a service is indicated by the number of systems that have already been proposed to address this issue. Examples of systems operating within this area include:
In many of the above systems the recipient must give either a credit/debit card number or bank account number to a third party (payer or other intermediary). In the case of using a credit/debit card, the payment is made by initiating a “refund” transaction even though there was no matching initial payment since the payment was made another party. There are two key problems with using this refund mechanism:
(1) Within the current card systems (such as Visa, Mastercard and Europay) there is the problem of reverse interchange. This is the process whereby a refund leads to the customer's bank (i.e., the bank who issued the credit card that is being refunded) paying back to the merchant acquiring bank (i.e., the bank that received the refund request from a credit card merchant) the interchange fee (effectively a commission) that would have been kept by the customers bank on the original payment. Since no original payment has been made in the scenario where someone is receiving money from a third party, the customer's bank (i.e., the bank who issued the credit card that is being refunded) is effectively being charged for the transaction at a cost of approximately 1.5% of its value depending on the prevailing interchange rates for the specific credit card. Under the current credit card systems, trying to change the rules for refunds to address this issue will lead to the converse problems in true refunds.
(2) In order to receive funds a user must reveal his or her actual credit card number. These details have the potential to be misused creating worry, inconvenience and potentially financial cost for the recipient. In the case of Internet payment systems, this information is then potentially stored on a server connected to the Internet. As recent fraud scares have indicated, storage of personal details in computer databases linked to the Internet represents possibly the most vulnerable security weakness with Internet based credit card transactions.
In addition, with several of above the above Internet payment services, the recipient receives an email notifying them that someone wishes to pay funds to them. The recipient then follows a link in the email to a site where he/she must enter their credit or bank account details to receive the funds. Clearly a fraudulent message offering a prize, a non-existent payment, etc., could easily lead to innocent victims giving over their credit card details which could then be misused by the perpetrator of the fraud.
These and other problems are solved by the present invention which represents a new form of credit/debit card with an associated account number that is limited so as to prevent it being used for any purchases—but instead is expressly designed for the purpose of receiving funds. In other words, the present invention involves a personal payment number (PPN) format including routing information (e.g., a BIN) to direct financial transaction information to a particular institution among a plurality of institutions on a computer network, and a unique identification of a user associated with the particular institution. The PPN format can also include an identifier identifying the personal payment number as an account to which funds can be transferred but from which funds cannot be transferred. The PPN format can follow a standard credit/debit card format, or can be unique among but follow standard credit/debit card formats or be distinct from standard credit/debit card formats. The PPN can alternatively follow a standard credit/debit card number format and omit any identifier, but the routing information be for an institution that is restricted to transactions where funds are received.
This personal payment number (PPN) can therefore be revealed without any concern for fraudulent misuse since it can only be used to receive funds and therefore is of no benefit to any other party. Any misuse would only benefit the registered cardholder. In effect it represents an inverse debit/credit card, allowing payment directly into an account rather than from an account.
To incorporate this invention with an existing credit or debit card account, a payment account number could be linked to an existing credit/debit card account so users would have a combined account with two numbers: one for making payments (the actual credit/debit card number) and one for receiving payments (the PPN or personal payment number).
The payment number could be printed on the back of an existing credit/debit card allowing for use in face to face transactions or for easy access if used over the phone or Internet. The number could also be stored within a software package (such as virtual card software) for easy use on the Internet.
Since a PPN can not be used (or misused) for making purchases it can be freely disseminated in a way similar to the way to a public encryption key is freely disseminated to allow payments to be made by anyone who needs to pay a certain person. Examples include shareware authors who could include their PPN in their software registration documentation. In on-line auction situations, sellers could email their PPN to the purchaser to allow them to complete the purchase at a payment service of their choice.
Of particular interest is the fact that a PPN could be used in place of a credit card number in the existing commercial systems named above (e.g., Billpoint, PayPal, Payme, and eMoneyMail) where the recipient receives funds by a refund onto a conventional credit card without the concerns of revealing a credit card number to a third party and its subsequent storage on an Internet accessible server.
The PPN, if it has the numerical format and verification codes (such as the checksum and cvv2) of a normal credit card, it can be processed by normal credit card terminals/software. To avoid any possible confusion with existing credit cards, an alternative would be to use a different number of digits or other differentiator. This would prevent the possibility of anyone trying to use a PPN for making a payment rather than receiving a payment since merchants and others would recognize that the PPN did not represent a valid credit card format. A possible disadvantage of specific PPN number format is that potentially less of the existing credit card infrastructure could be used leading to increased up-front investment costs for implementation of the system.
These and other advantages, features and aspects of the present invention shall now be described by way of exemplary embodiments to which the present invention is not limited with reference to a accompanying drawing figures in which:
In this specification the terms “credit card” and “credit/debit card” refers to credit cards (MasterCard®, Visa®, Diners Club®, etc.), charge cards (e.g., American Express®, some department store cards), debit cards such as usable at ATMs and many other locations or that are associated with a particular account, and hybrids thereof (e.g., extended payment American Express®, bank debit cards with the Visa® logo, etc.).
Various aspects of the invention may be embodied in a general purpose digital computer that is running a program or program segments originating from a computer readable or usable medium, such medium including but not limited to magnetic storage media (e.g., ROMs, floppy disks, hard disks, etc.), optically readable media (e.g., CD-ROMs, DVDs, etc.) and carrier waves (e.g., transmissions over the Internet). A functional program, code and code segments, used to implement the present invention can be derived by a skilled computer programmer from the description of the invention contained herein.
Exemplary System Implementation
The central processing station 102 itself may include a central processing unit 120, which interfaces with the remote units via network I/O unit 118. The central processing unit 120 has access to a database of credit card numbers 124, a subset 126 of which are designated as being available for use as personal payment numbers.
Also, the central processing unit 120 has access to a central database 122, referred to as a “links” database. This database is a general purpose database which stores information regarding customers' accounts, such as information regarding various links between each customer's PPN and his or her regular credit card account or other type of account using, for instance, some type of linked-list mechanism. Databases 122 and 124 are shown separately only to illustrate the type of information which may be maintained by the central processing station 102; the information in these databases can be commingled in a common database in a manner well understood by those having skill in the data processing arts. For instance, each PPN can be stored with a field which identifies a regular account to which it is linked, and various conditions regarding its use. It should be noted that no discernable relationship should exist between the PPN and the regular credit card number. Also, the different databases can be addressed using different BIN numbers or different number formats or other identifiers in the PPN number.
The central processing unit 120 can internally perform the approval and denial of transaction requests. For the PPN, if the transaction does not involve transferring funds into the PPN account, the transaction would be denied. For credit transactions, the approval or denial by making reference to credit history information and other information in the conventional manner. Alternatively, this function can be delegated to a separate clearance processing facility (not shown).
Finally, the central processing station includes the capability of transmitting the PPN to customers. In a first embodiment, a local card dispenser 128 can be employed to generate a plurality of PPN cards 132 and/or credit cards 134 additionally bearing a PPN for delivery to a customer. In another embodiment, the PPN can be printed on a form 136 by printer 130, which is then delivered to the customer via the mail. The PPN can be included in the initial letter distributing an associated credit card, or in a monthly or other periodic account statement sent to the customer. In yet another embodiment, the PPN can be electronically downloaded to a user's personal computer 104, where they are stored in local memory 142 of the personal computer 104 for subsequent use. In this case, the PPN can be encrypted, but concern over release of the PPN is much less than for regular credit card numbers. Instead of the personal computer 104, the numbers can be downloaded to a user's smart card though an appropriate interface. In a still further embodiment, the PPN can be downloaded to a radio unit 140 (such as a portable telephone) via wireless communication. In another embodiment, an ATM 108 can be used to dispense the PPN cards 110. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other means for conveying the PPN numbers/cards can be employed. These embodiments are, of course, usable together.
The logic used to perform the PPN transactions preferably comprises a microprocessor which implements a stored program within the central processing unit 120. Any general or special purpose computer will suffice. In alternative embodiments, the logic used to perform the PPN transactions may comprise discrete logic components, or some combination of discrete logic components and computer-implemented control.
Personal Payment Number Format
Within the VISA and Mastercard systems, for instance, the first 6 digits of a credit card number represent a code (Bank Identification number or BIN) to identify both the issuing institution and are also used to define the associated charges (interchange fees) that are automatically made for each transaction. Other credit card systems use a similar procedure and card number format. A card issuing bank will typically have several BIN's, one for each different card products that attract different interchange rates. By allocating PPN's within a BIN that is used exclusively for PPN's, no payments can be made in that BIN. Therefore the interchange fees can be adjusted to make them appropriate for this sort of payment (ideally attracting zero or negative interchange).
This is in contrast refunding a conventional card account number leads to inverse interchange being charged to the card holder's bank as discussed above. In this situation, the card holder's bank is effectively subsidizing whichever merchant/acquirer handles the refund and has no effective means of control over this transaction and the associated costs. Although these distinctions make little difference to the holder of a PPN, they are of great relevance to the banks since they have a direct impact on the income from their credit card portfolio.
Thus, a personal payment number format includes routing information (e.g., BIN) 201 to direct financial transaction information to a particular institution among a plurality of institutions using a computer network, such as shown in the exemplary embodiment of
This identification of the account as being a payment only account can take on several forms. For instance, the personal payment number format can include an identifier 203 identifying the personal payment number as an account into which funds can be transferred but not from which funds can be received. The position of this identifier 203 within the PPN format could be arbitrary or selected according to factors outside the scope of this invention. Alternatively, the identifier 203 can be omitted and the routing information 201 (e.g., BIN) can identify an address associated with accounts limited to receiving funds and not capable of transferring out funds.
The format of a PPN should ideally be of a format that is compatible with the existing credit/debit card numbering format which is usually 16 digits with a current maximum of 19 digits for the account number field within the industry standard transaction messaging protocols. The PPN should also have a valid checksum to ensure that it is transmitted without problems through existing networks which may include checksum validation. An expiry date should be provided and additional verification codes such as the cvv2 code if required to ensure compliance with existing networks.
A PPN specific coding format could be used to prevent confusion with existing credit cards but this would reduce the compatibility with the existing credit card systems requiring additional investment to implement the system. A compromise would be for the PPN to deviate from an existing format sufficiently to allow easy recognition that it is not a normal credit card number while still allowing transmission in the data fields of the transaction messaging systems that would normally hold the credit card number, for example for VISA cards 17 or 18 digits could be used to differentiate from the existing 16 digit credit card format, such as shown in
In other words, the personal payment number can be formatted in accordance with standard credit/debit card formats. It can also be formatted to be distinct from standard credit/debit card formats, which might require some adjustment to the conventional credit transaction processing system. Alternatively, the personal payment number can be formatted to be unique among standard credit/debit card formats but remain within the acceptable standards for processing within the conventional credit transaction processing system. For instance, it can have an extra number which is acceptable to the credit transaction system, but not currently used by card issuing institutions. Also, the personal payment number format can include a verification code such as a checksum number and a cvv2.
The PPN Uses and Processes
A PPN can be used in a variety of ways. After a transaction is begun by accessing a web site or the like a PPN account holder can transmit the number (even by insecure means such as email) along with an electronic invoice requesting payment for goods/services provided. A PPN can also be included in the documentation or program code of a shareware or “try before you buy” software package. In this was the payee does not have to make any active step to receive funds, the person registering/purchasing the software simply uses the PPN to make the payment at an appropriate registration site. A PPN could also be displayed within a webpage.
In many current systems such as Billpoint the recipient receives an automated email from the payment system website when a payment is made. It is only when the recipient registers with the payment company that credit card or account details are given. Under these circumstances it possible that the email could be intercepted and someone other than intended recipient collects the funds. With a PPN payment, the payer can optionally verify the name linked to the PPN at a time of making a payment (Step 303) thus ensuring that the correct person is being credited. Alternatively banks could provide an authorized directory to allow payers to obtain a person's PPN, a form of PPN escrow.
Implementation Components
Implementation of the PPN solution includes a system and process comprising the following exemplary components:
These components are taken in turn for more detailed descriptions.
Users can request a PPN from their bank or a bank can automatically allocate and distribute a PPN to all its account holders. During this process the bank logs details such as the account name, the PPN and the associated account in which funds are to be lodged. The options for the receiving account include a credit card account, a debit card account, free-standing bank account or other suitable account. It is important that the bank authenticates the user during this process to prevent people assuming the identity of others in order to receive funds fraudulently.
The request for a PPN can be received by the bank as an in-branch request, phone request, mail-in request, fax request or via an electronic network such as the Internet or digital TV. All these request avenues should feed into a single logging system to allow these requests to be processed appropriately.
An applicant can request a PPN account from a financial institution either in association with an existing credit/debit card/bank account, or as a standalone payment instrument (i.e. where the user's credit cards and bank accounts are held with another financial institution). In the former case the financial institution already has account information available as to where to forward the monies received, the user need only specify which account he/she wishes to use. In the case of a stand alone account the user must provide details of where the funds are to be transferred. The request can be handled by any normal route (in bank branch, by post, fax phone or by electronic network such as the Internet).
The PPN allocation system handles requests for a PPN. During this allocation the system provides a valid PPN account number.
The allocation system ensures that there is no reversible numerical relationship between the PPN and an associated credit/debit card in order to ensure that the real credit/debit card number cannot be derived from the PPN. In addition the allocation system must check the availability of a PPN before issue to ensure that each issued PPN is unique. The leading digits of the PPN must be defined in order to route the PPN to the processing center appropriate for each issuing bank, in the existing credit card systems this is achieved with the use of BIN number (usually the leading 6 digits).
Following the registration and allocation process, details of the allocated PPN and associated credit/debit card or other account details need to be logged in a database (122 and 124,
An interface allows database queries, for example to request a PPN for a specific individual or to verify that a PPN belongs to a specific person. This function allows for the payer to ensure that the PPN belongs to the intended recipient and the number has not been altered or wrongly recorded at any point. The system could be used as a trusted source of PPN numbers as a form of PPN escrow. Alternatively for increased privacy a user could be required to enter the PPN and a name and be informed only if the match is correct or incorrect. A PPN holder may request for this service to be disabled if they wish for complete anonymity. This latter option will be provided only at the discretion of the issuing bank.
It is important to prevent unauthorized access to or alteration of credit/debit card or other personal details information of PPN holders held in the database. Therefore this database access system is highly secure and only allow specific types of requests by application of appropriate industry standard security and “firewall” technology. The database must however allow the bank and or the PPN holder (with appropriate authentication) to update information in the database if the PPN holder wishes to alter the status and stored attributes of the PPN account.
This database should also provide means for review of both PPN holders and the issuing bank of all transactions details. Access to this function can be via the customer service system or by the provision of a direct software connection to the database for example using software that the PPN holder obtains from his bank or using a standard browser interface.
A range of PPN user storage and access devices can be used and the choice of the most appropriate format will depend on how the user intends to use the system. The user could simply be notified of the PPN number by letter or by the issuing a paper certificate, as explained above (136,
The PPN can also be provided encoded in a software package that can be accessed by the user as required. The PPN could also be stored remotely by the issuing bank with the user accessing the number as required while connected to an electronic network (Internet, digital TV etc) using a browser or software designed for this express purpose (142,
Mechanisms are also required to initiate payments via a PPN. The account holder could register the PPN within a third party system electronic payment system such as PayPal, etc. and the system could then operate normally while providing extra security because the third party system electronic payment system does not hold actual bank or credit card details. In this scenario, payment would be made by whatever mechanism the system supports. Money would be transferred to the PPN as credit card refund. Such a refund could be handled by existing credit card terminals or transaction processing software if the PPN conformed to the standard credit card number format. When this transaction reaches the issuing bank it is remapped to transfer the funds either to the users own credit card account or directly to a bank account.
In addition banks could implement their own specific systems and devices for handling PPN payments. Such systems could add additional features such as PPN recipient verification, extraction of appropriate fees at source, allowing PPN holders and payers to check/review prior payments/receipts and provision of a digital receipt for the payer/recipient in the case of later disputes.
In the case of a PPN system using its own numerical format that deviated in some respects from standard credit formats, specifically modified transaction devices/software may be required to recognise and validate the PPN format before initiating the transaction.
A PPN transaction once initiated would be transferred through the credit card networks typically involving transmission to a merchant acquiring bank and then onto the issuing bank either directly or via the existing card associations (e.g., VISA, Mastercard or Europay etc.) networks, collectively referred to and the central processing station 102 in
In the case of a PPN system using its own numerical format that deviated in some respects from standard credit formats, modifications to the existing systems may be required. Ideally from a commercial stand-point the PPN format should be capable of routing through the existing credit card networks even if it deviates from the standard format. Therefore in determining the appropriate number format for the PPN, the ability of the existing systems to transparently handle such a format is of key importance.
On receipt of a PPN transaction the processing system completes some or all of the following processes:
The customer service system provides the bank with a means to monitor activity and transactions with the PPN processing system. This will include assessing the state of the PPN processing system and initiating database queries for completed transactions. The need for this service arises from the need for monitoring by the bank and to handle customer queries regarding specific PPN transactions.
Integration with Existing Payment Services
For PPN systems using existing credit card formats, the system will be compatible with any system that currently provides for payment onto a credit/debit card.
Banks that issue PPN accounts could provide a specific payment portal/website that would operate for their own or any other banks PPN. This has the benefit that the payer can choose a site that he trusts on the basis of a well known name or potentially his/her own bank even if he/she does not have a PPN account. The recipient therefore does not have to dictate to the payer that the payment is made on a specific site (one that the payer may not previously have known). Such a site can provide enhanced PPN services. These services could include providing verification that a specific PPN was associated with the intended payee, email notification by the PPN holder of a payment and provision of a digital receipt signed by a certificate authority for use in case of a dispute. Payment from the payer can be initiated as a bank transfer or credit card payment or other suitable remote payment mechanism. The funds could then be transferred to the PPN by initiating a credit card refund transaction using the PPN and existing credit transaction handling hardware or software. This site can, under terms agreed with both parties, extract commission for the transaction from either the vendor or the purchaser. This would most commonly happen in association with online auction sites. To extract commission from the purchaser, the transaction website adds a specified amount or percentage to the transaction. To extract commission from the vendor a specific amount is deducted from the transaction prior to completing the transfer of funds to the payment number's account.
Transaction Cycle
Once the payment site receives the PPN, a standard type credit card refund transaction message is created, typically for refunds within a settlement message file, containing the PPN, transaction amount and other required information. The credit card networks will route the information contained within the transaction messages according to the leading digits of the payment number in the same manner as an existing credit card transaction. This will be routed on the basis of a specific BIN (i.e. Bank Identification Number such as the first six digits in a VISA format number) to a dedicated processing server which will verify the validity of the payment number and use a database to identify the appropriate receiving account.
With a credit card format compatible PPN, funds transfer will be handled by the existing settlement systems with funds being transferred to the PPN issuing bank from the card scheme and recovered by the scheme from the merchant acquirer bank and from there from the originating payment site which acts as a credit card merchant. In the case that the acquiring bank and issuing bank are the same institution or have a bilateral agreement then the funds transfer may be made without reference to the card scheme networks.
Implementation of Location of System Components
In terms of location of the system, it could be implemented within a bank's internal credit card processing system. If a dedicated BIN (i.e. 6 digit header in VISA and Mastercard systems) is used then the credit card networks will direct all transactions to the required processing site. The software receiving the transaction information would validate the PPN number, determine the matching account details and then use standard existing networks to effect the payment.
The service could also be offered on a bureau basis whereby the PPN transactions of wide range of banks would be directed to a single site operated on behalf of all the banks. Provided this site had access to the account details of each PPN holder and access to the banking/credit card payment systems, such a single site could operate such a service for many banks. This service could allow banks to handle their own PPN allocation and then inform the central service of the number. Alternatively the entire process could be centralized with the bureau service hosting the allocation system. In this option, banks would when handling a request for a PPN request a PPN from the central system and provide the other required account details at the same time.
Such a bureau solution could be operated by the card scheme themselves providing a global service from a single site. In this situation the central site could provide for remapping the received PPN to the matching credit/debit card and forward the transaction/settlement messages onto the appropriate institutions for completion of the transaction. The interchange fees contained within the settlement messages would inherited from the original message to maintain the PPN specific interchange fees rather than the interchange associated with the receiving account. In this scenario the banks would receive standard refund transactions on a credit/debit card number and can process these entirely as normal without the financial costs associated with reverse interchange. Alternatively the central system could also provide for direct transfer of funds to a users bank account without the need for further use of the credit card systems, instead linking directly into the electronic funds transfer systems.
Alternative Implementation
In the above description the transaction website (effectively a web merchant) initiates the purchasing transaction on behalf of the payer and transmits the required information for the payment transaction for processing by the payment card processing software center. In this scenario the payment from the payer and the payment to the recipient are separate transactions.
An alternative is for both the PPN and the purchasing credit card number to be transmitted within appropriate fields within the financial message that is transmitted back for processing, with the PPN being used as the primary account number to ensure appropriate routing of the transaction message. In this scenario the payment and receipt of funds are linked and conducted by a party within the banking/credit card system rather than at the merchant level. This has the advantage that the payers details can be logged along with the PPN transaction to allow for easier transaction audit. Under these circumstances the required processing for both making and receiving the payment could be initiated at several levels, either at the level of a credit card merchant acquirer bank, within the card scheme systems or following routing from a merchant acquirer to a card processing system. Within these systems the purchasing and payment transaction can then be executed either within the same system (i.e., merchant acquirer or by processing system) or be divided between the two systems. Completion of the transaction will require one of these two systems to initiate a standard credit transaction effectively acting as a merchant and receive payment on behalf of the purchaser or to receive funds from the payer using an alternative payment system. An appropriate fund transfer (or credit to a credit card account) is then made to the payee. Pre-agreed commissions can be added to the purchase amount or deducted from payment amount in the course of the transaction. A negotiated commission can be paid to the website/merchant that initiated the transaction and transmitted the information into the credit card networks. This can be done in an independent settlement process or by direct bank transfer since the merchant is identified within the financial message format as described above.
The PPN has a number of highly positive features such as:
(1) PPN can be used in situations where revealing a credit card number would be considered potentially risky.
(2) The interchange fees associated with normal transactions can be modified to be appropriate for receiving payment rather than making payment. This allows for person to person payments without impacting on the processing of true refunds.
(3) The existing global credit card networks can be used to handle the payment providing a trusted established system.
(4) Currency exchange is handled automatically by the card networks.
(5) In order to receive payment, the PPN holder does not need to reveal bank account or credit/debit card details to anyone other than his own bank or credit card company.
It will be appreciated that the present invention is not limited to the foregoing exemplary embodiments. Variations and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention as described in the claims appended hereto.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/129,033 filed on Apr. 13, 1999, herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3938091 | Atalla et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4423316 | Sano et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4707592 | Ware | Nov 1987 | A |
4725719 | Oncken et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4747050 | Brachtl et al. | May 1988 | A |
4797920 | Stein | Jan 1989 | A |
4856062 | Weiss | Aug 1989 | A |
4941090 | McCarthy | Jul 1990 | A |
4988849 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4998279 | Weiss | Mar 1991 | A |
5023904 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5093861 | Graham | Mar 1992 | A |
5097505 | Weiss | Mar 1992 | A |
5117355 | McCarthy | May 1992 | A |
5130519 | Bush et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5163097 | Pegg | Nov 1992 | A |
5193114 | Moseley | Mar 1993 | A |
5196840 | Leith et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202826 | McCarthy | Apr 1993 | A |
5239583 | Parrillo | Aug 1993 | A |
5287268 | McCarthy | Feb 1994 | A |
5317636 | Vizcaino | May 1994 | A |
5323338 | Hawthorne | Jun 1994 | A |
5326960 | Tannenbaum | Jul 1994 | A |
5343529 | Goldfine et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350906 | Brody et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5363449 | Bestock | Nov 1994 | A |
5428684 | Akiyama et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5466919 | Hovakimian | Nov 1995 | A |
5478994 | Rahman et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479494 | Clitherow | Dec 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5500513 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504808 | Hamrick, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5555497 | Helbling | Sep 1996 | A |
5577109 | Stimson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583918 | Nakagawa | Dec 1996 | A |
5592553 | Guski et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606614 | Brady et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5621201 | Langhans et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627355 | Rahman et al. | May 1997 | A |
5671279 | Elgamal | Sep 1997 | A |
5677955 | Doggett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694471 | Chen et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696908 | Muehlberger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721768 | Stimson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724424 | Gifford | Mar 1998 | A |
5748908 | Yu | May 1998 | A |
5757917 | Rose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5768381 | Hawthorne | Jun 1998 | A |
5777305 | Smith et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5777306 | Masuda | Jul 1998 | A |
5825881 | Colvin, Sr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826241 | Stein et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826243 | Musmanno et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832087 | Hawthorne | Nov 1998 | A |
5864830 | Armetta et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
RE36116 | McCarthy | Feb 1999 | E |
5868236 | Rademacher | Feb 1999 | A |
5883810 | Franklin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890137 | Korceda | Mar 1999 | A |
5893907 | Ukuda | Apr 1999 | A |
5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903878 | Talati et al. | May 1999 | A |
5953710 | Fleming | Sep 1999 | A |
5956699 | Wong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5984180 | Albrecht | Nov 1999 | A |
5991750 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012048 | Gustin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6029890 | Austin | Feb 2000 | A |
6032133 | Hilt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6144948 | Walker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163771 | Walker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185545 | Resnick et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188761 | Dickerman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6227447 | Campisano | May 2001 | B1 |
6240397 | Sachs | May 2001 | B1 |
6267292 | Walker et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6298335 | Bernstein | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324526 | D'Agostino | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6339766 | Gephart | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341724 | Campisano | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6343279 | Bissonette et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352205 | Mullins et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375084 | Stanford et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408284 | Hilt et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422462 | Cohen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6598031 | Ice | Jul 2003 | B1 |
20020120587 | D'Agostino | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030097331 | Cohen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030216997 | Cohen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 081 921 | Jun 1983 | EP |
0 590 861 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0 590 961 | Apr 1994 | EP |
2 661 996 | Nov 1991 | FR |
2 145 265 | Mar 1985 | GB |
2 252 270 | Aug 1992 | GB |
2 305 393 | Apr 1997 | GB |
2 327 831 | Feb 1999 | GB |
2 361 790 | Oct 2001 | GB |
6-282556 | Oct 1994 | JP |
WO 9112680 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9112693 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9314476 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9507512 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9608756 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9642150 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9715893 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9719549 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9826376 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9830985 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9949424 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60129033 | Apr 1999 | US |