Patent Application
20240125742
The present invention relates generally to the field of non-destructive testing and in particular to Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer (EMAT).
Engineered structures exposed to tension, pressure, corrosive products, and harsh environments will eventually develop defects such as cracking and corrosion that could affect their structural integrity.
Ultrasonic guided waves are frequently used for the inspection of these structures since they permit covering long spans from a fixed point and inspecting areas that are hidden or not directly accessible. However, while finding defects has become common practice, characterization and sizing of these defects is a much more elusive goal.
The best-known guided wave sizing method with literature dating back to 1998 is the frequency cutoff technique. Recent work by Pialucha and Balasubramanian depicts two variations of this technique to assess the remaining wall of a plate or plate-like structure.
On U.S. Pat. No. 11,022,436 B2, Pialucha describes a system that uses a separate Shear Horizontal EMAT transmitter and receiver to generate the non-dispersive SH0 mode and at least one dispersive mode (e.g. SH1) at a wide range of frequencies. The remaining wall is derived from determining what frequencies propagate through the wall loss and which ones are “cut off” and reflected back by this wall loss. To be able to generate different frequencies, Pialucha uses a Lorentz force permanent magnet EMAT array transducer and a device that changes the wavelength of the transducer by mechanically moving the permanent magnets in the array to different wavelengths so the frequencies of interest can be generated.
On US20220214313A1, Balasubramanian describes a system that uses the same frequency cutoff technique for the same purpose. Balasubramanian in this case uses a transducer with variable wavelength which is excited with a broadband pulse (chirp, spike, or low cycle Hanning) to generate the desired wave modes. Balasubramanian also uses a Lorentz force EMAT magnet array transducer in his description and drawings, but in this case, there is no need for a mechanical device to discretely change the wavelength of the EMAT transducer.
The constructions described by both Pialucha and Balasubramanian rely on Lorentz force EMAT magnet arrays which have some limitations.
One limitation of this construction is that it can only be used on conductive materials since it relies on electromagnetic induction of the ultrasound on the material.
Another limitation of this transducer construction is that the maximum size of each pole in the array is equivalent to half of the smallest wavelength that needs to be generated, so the individual magnets tend to be relatively small and therefore weak. Moreover, by having the magnets in the array with different polarity next to each other, a large component of the magnetic field flows from pole to pole instead of to the part underneath. The result is that Lorentz force EMAT magnet array transducers are limited to larger wavelengths and generate very weak signals which makes them ineffective for most amplitude-based analyses.
Another limitation of this transducer construction is that the transmitter also generates ultrasound in the permanent magnets which create strong reverberations that can hide the receiving signals. The solution is to use different transducers from transmission and reception which increases the footprint of the design and reduces the practicality of the system.
Balasubramanian mentions using EMATs based on magnetostriction, but magnetostrictive EMATs by themselves are further limited to ferromagnetic materials and require extremely strong tangential fields that can only be produced with pulsed electromagnets or very large permanent magnets that make them unwieldy and difficult to use.
In addition to the limitations of the transducer constructions described by Pialucha and Balasubramanian, the more fundamental problem is the shortcomings inherent to the frequency cutoff technique itself.
Mathematical modeling has shown that the shape of the defects with regard to depth, length, and angle in the wave propagation direction has a great effect on how they perform as frequency filters. For example, short and sharp defects can result in mode conversion of the SH1 mode as it goes through the defects thus creating new frequency components that render the technique moot. Similarly, the non-dispersive SH0 mode can also have frequency components above the cutoff frequency which, depending on the depth, length, and angle of the defects, can mode-convert to SH1 also causing the technique to provide wrong results. These problems are especially acute on short but deep defects such as pits and cracks which can be especially damaging to a structure but cannot be reliably measured using the frequency cutoff technique.
In addition to the depth, length, and angle of the defects in the direction of wave propagation, the width of the defects can also make the technique fail. In this case, if the aperture of the RF coil and beam profile is wider than the defects, the wave can wrap around them and propagate to the other side instead of being cut off.
Another limitation of this technique is that the transmitter and receiver transducers need to be sufficiently far apart to differentiate the measurements of the SH0 and SH1 wave modes. This limitation impedes using this technique for many close-range applications such as circumferential measurements on pipes and tubes smaller than 150-200 mm in diameter.
This disclosure introduces a novel guided wave system and method that circumvents these limitations with a combination of fixed-wavelength and variable-wavelength analysis as well as a novel magnetostrictive-strip EMAT transducer that permits signal amplitude measurements by greatly increasing signal-to-noise.
The system and method can be applied to any structure that supports the propagation of guided waves, regardless of the material and geometry.
A first aspect of the present invention provides a system with a magnetostrictive-strip EMAT transducer comprising at least one biasing static magnetic field, at least one RF coil for fixed-wavelength measurements, at least one RF coil for variable-wavelength measurements, and a strip of highly magnetostrictive material that is coupled with the structure.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a method to determine the size of defects on a relatively thin structure such as a pipeline wall, a tank wall, a rod, or a plane fuselage component by combining fixed-wavelength measurements of the signal reflected or attenuated by the defects with a variable-wavelength frequency analysis to detect and determine the actual frequencies that have propagated through the area being inspected.
The method involves pulsing the RF coil for fixed-wavelength measurements and recording the strength of the reflected and/or attenuated signal after it passes through the area of interest, as well as the frequency content of this response. A second measurement is performed by pulsing a variable-wavelength RF coil to record the frequencies that are reflected or pass through the area being inspected. The fixed-wavelength results are processed using artificial intelligence algorithms (e.g. neural network) that include models created using Finite Element Analysis and empirical calibrations. These fixed-wavelength measurements provide defect geometry and size estimates that are used to determine whether the variable-wavelength depth measurements can also be used. The accuracy of the system can be further improved by taking measurements from different locations. The final defect sizing assessment is based on the fixed-wavelength estimate, the variable-wavelength estimate, or a combination of both.
The following detailed description is of the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out exemplary embodiments of the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense but is made merely to illustrate the general principles of the invention since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
This invention describes a novel system that can be used to estimate the defect size of any structure that supports the transmission of guided waves in frequencies ranging from 20 kHz to 10 MHz. The system can be applied to plates, pipes, rods, wire ropes, and other structures made out of metallic and non-metallic materials.
The method used in this system combines a fixed-wavelength analysis of amplitude and frequency response with a variable-wavelength frequency cutoff technique to further refine the analysis when the dimensions and geometry of the defects permit this analysis.
The system uses a magnetostrictive-strip EMAT transducer which has shown to produce up to 40 dB stronger signals than equivalent Lorentz force EMAT magnet array transducers and 20-30 dB stronger signals than magnetostrictive EMAT transducers. The strong signal-to-noise is paramount for detecting and sizing cracks and pits of small diameter using amplitude measurements as part of the fixed-wavelength analysis since they cannot be properly detected and sized using the frequency cutoff technique.
A magnetostrictive EMAT transducer induces ultrasonic waves into a test object with two interacting magnetic fields. A relatively high frequency (RF) field is generated by electrical coils and a strong biasing tangential field is generated with large permanent magnets or a pulsed electromagnet. The tangential magnetic field is perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation to generate shear-horizontal type waves or parallel to the direction of wave propagation to generate Lamb waves, shear vertical waves, and surface waves. These transducers work only on naturally magnetostrictive materials which limits them in practice to mild grades of low-carbon steel.
A magnetostrictive-strip EMAT transducer on the other hand can be used to inspect materials with low or no magnetostriction or to simply improve signal-to-noise on any material. In this case, the ultrasound is induced on a strip of highly magnetostrictive material such as FeCo which is pressure-coupled or adhered to the structure. The RF coil or coils are positioned on top of this strip and the biasing magnetization may be achieved by swiping the magnetostrictive strip with a permanent magnet before the scan, or by using a weak permanent magnet or an electromagnet. Unlike a Lorentz force EMAT magnet array or an EMAT that relies on the magnetostriction of the structure, the magnetostrictive-strip EMAT transducer can be used on any component that can support the propagation of guided waves, regardless of the material composition of the component. Unlike Lorentz force EMAT magnetic array transducers, the magnetostrictive strip transducers can be used to transmit and receive with the same transducer.
The novel magnetostrictive-strip EMAT transducer in this disclosure incorporates two RF coils; a narrowband fixed-wavelength meander RF coil, and a broadband variable-wavelength coil used for frequency cutoff discrimination. Additional fixed-wavelength and variable-wavelength coils can be added to address different thicknesses at the same time.
Even though the transducer can have both RF coils mounted and pulsed together, they can also be positioned on separate transducers and pulsed together or separately.
The fixed-wavelength RF coil can collect signal reflections and attenuation as well as the frequency content of these signals. This information can be received from one or more locations on the structure to further improve accuracy.
The complete methodology for the fixed-wavelength and variable-wavelength technique is shown in
In Step S1 the values of amplitude and frequency content from the fixed-wavelength RF coil from one or more locations are measured and registered. The values can include amplitude from reflection and/or attenuation. The frequency content can be calculated using a Fast-Fourier Transform (FFT) or Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) on the received signals.
In S2 the results are processed through regression analysis and a neural network or similar artificial intelligence algorithm that includes models of the structure using Finite Element Modeling and Empirical Calibrations from representative samples. As more samples and actual results are entered into the model, the system will improve its accuracy over time.
The results from the Amplitude and Frequency Content analysis is a Fixed-Wavelength Sizing (FWS) Estimate of the structure with information on the dimensions of the defects S3.
In parallel, the system takes readings with the variable-wavelength RF coil which is inserted in the Frequency Cutoff Model (FC Model). If the FWS Estimate for size and dimensions does not meet the requirements to use the FC Model, the final result is the FWS Estimate previously calculated S4.
If the FWS meets the FC Model criteria, the system uses the data collected from the variable-wavelength RF coil and generates a Variable-Wavelength Sizing (VWS) Estimate S5.
The results from FWS and VWS are compared. If they are not in the expected range, the system provides a Qualified FWS Estimate with a narrower range and higher confidence than the simple FWS Estimate S6.
If the results from FWS and VWS are in range, the system provides a verified VWS Estimate with the highest degree of confidence and accuracy range S7.
