The present invention is generally directed to a delivery system for edible compositions in which a desired active component is encapsulated in a manner such that the tensile strength of the delivery system is within a desirable range to provide controlled release of the active component in a consistent manner over an extended period of time.
Encapsulating active components in edible compositions to prolong their release and/or to slow their degradation is known. Encapsulating materials used to coat such components include, for example, cellulose, cellulose derivatives, arabinogalactin, gum arabic, polyolefins, waxes, vinyl polymers, gelatin, zein and mixtures thereof. The encapsulating materials have been used to protect active components such as sweeteners, acids, flavorings, soluble dietary fibers, biologically active agents such as pharmaceutical compounds or medicinal drugs, breath freshening agents, and the like.
Attempts have been made to encapsulate active components such as sweeteners, particularly high intensity sweeteners to prevent against premature degradation, to enhance the uniformity of release, and to prolong release in a controlled manner. High intensity sweeteners generally have a sweetening intensity greater than sugar (sucrose) and a caloric value lower than that of sugar at equivalent sweetness levels. It is especially desirable to control the release of high intensity sweeteners in compositions since the high sweetness levels can easily overwhelm the consumer. Moreover, the controlled release of the sweetener provides desirable masking of unpleasant tasting materials. Because each high intensity sweetener is chemically and physically distinct, each is a challenge to use in an edible composition and each exhibits one or more shortcomings, which may be moderated by encapsulation.
For example, many high intensity sweeteners lose their sweetness intensity rapidly when used in edible compositions such as chewing gums and confections. Encapsulation can modulate and prolong release to provide a more desirable taste profile. Some high intensity sweeteners such as saccharin, stevioside, acesulfame-K, glycyrrhizin, and thaumatin have an associated bitter taste or off-note. Certain high intensity sweeteners are also unstable in the presence of certain chemicals including aldehydes and ketones, and sensitive to exposure to environmental conditions including moisture. Solid sucralose is known to turn dark during prolong storage upon exposure to heat and ambient air. Encapsulation can be used to isolate unstable compounds to prevent degradation and prolong shelf life.
Typically, the taste profile of a high intensity sweetener can be described as a rapid burst of sweetness. Usually, high intensity sweeteners reach their peak sweet taste rapidly, with the intensity of sweet taste rapidly declining soon thereafter. The initial rapid burst can be unpleasant to many consumers as the strong sweet taste tends to overpower the other flavors that may be present in the edible composition. The relatively rapid loss of sweetness can also result in a bitter aftertaste. For this reason, it is typically desirable to encapsulate high intensity sweeteners with an encapsulating material in order to modulate and prolong the release rate and to chemically stabilize and enhance the overall taste profile. The selection of a suitable encapsulating material (i.e., polyvinyl acetate) has usually been focused on the molecular weight of the encapsulating material with higher molecular weights generally associated with longer release times.
By way of example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,784 to Yang discloses a chewing gum composition containing a high molecular weight polyvinyl acetate blended with a hydrophobic plasticizer as an encapsulating material. The encapsulating material is used to encapsulate an active ingredient such as aspartame.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,265 to Cherukuri et al. discloses a sweetener delivery system, which uses a coating composed of an emulsifier and a polyvinyl acetate encapsulating material having a molecular weight of from about 2,000 to 14,000, optionally in the presence of a wax. The coating is applied to sweeteners such as aspartame to effectuate sustained release of the sweetener.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,328 to Cherukuri et al. discloses a food acid delivery system for use in for example, chewing gums, having a food acid that is encapsulated in a matrix comprising an emulsifier and polyvinyl acetate in a specified molecular weight range.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,763 to Chau et al. discloses a sweetening agent delivery system having prolonged sweetener release. The system utilizes a high intensity sweetener encapsulated in polyvinyl acetate having a molecular weight in the range of from about 2,000 to 100,000. The system further includes the use of a plasticizing agent, a waxy material and an emulsifying agent.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,002 to Duggan et al. discloses a process for preparing sweeteners and acids as ingredients for chewing gum compositions. In particular, the Duggan et al. reference discloses encapsulating the sweetener or acid in a delivery system such as polyvinyl acetate.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 2002/0122842 filed by Seiestad et al. discloses food mixtures including chewing gums containing at least two acids encapsulated by a polyvinyl acetate matrix. The polyvinyl acetate has a molecular weight in the range of from about 20,000 to 120,000.
The prior art systems identified above prepare encapsulating materials by taking into account the selection of an encapsulating material (e.g. polyvinyl acetate) and its molecular weight.
Since polyvinyl acetate is the most common encapsulating material, the molecular weight of the material becomes a critical feature in the making of prior art delivery systems. Thus, the state of the art for encapsulating active components especially high intensity sweeteners essentially associates controlled release of the active component with the molecular weight of the encapsulating material. However, this approach is limited in that the predictable modification of the controlled release of the active agent is made only through the modification of the molecular weight of the encapsulating material. There is no predictable modification based on the use of other encapsulating materials and/or additives that may be employed in the preparation of suitable delivery systems. Thus, there is no comprehensive approach to the production of a desirable delivery system that can provide a desirable release rate of an active component without engaging in a significant amount of trial and error experimentation.
It would therefore be a significant advance in the art to provide a process of producing delivery systems for the desirable release of an active component so that regardless of the type of the composition of the delivery system it will be suitable for the particular application (e.g., the controlled delivery of a high intensity sweetener).
The present invention provides a new approach to the controlled release of an active component in edible compositions such as, for example, chewing gum and confectionery compositions. The active component(s) and materials used to encapsulate the same provide a delivery system(s) that enables exceptional control of the release of the active component over a wide range of delivery systems and takes into account the use of a range of encapsulating materials and additives that may be used to formulate the delivery system. The delivery system is formulated based on tensile strength as the prime factor in formulating a delivery system that can deliver a designated active component at a desirable release rate. The encapsulated active components are preserved until release is desirable and therefore protected against moisture, reactive compounds, pH changes and the like. When the active component is a sweetener, the delivery system is tailored to the sweetener to provide consistent sustained release, thus extending the time the sweetener is released to provide an edible composition which provides a long lasting desirable taste profile, increased salivation and overall enjoyment of the taste imparted therefrom without the disadvantage of prior art systems in which the sweetener may be released at less or more than a desirable rate.
The present invention is premised on the discovery that the tensile strength of the delivery system provides a desired controlled, extended release of an active component. As a result, a delivery system can be readily and easily formulated using a broad range of materials (e.g., encapsulating agents, active components, additives) with the desired characteristics to achieve a particular desirable release rate. The active components and materials used to encapsulate the same provide a delivery system that provides exceptional control of the release of the active component.
It has been found in accordance with the present invention that a delivery system for active components can be provided based on the tensile strength of the delivery system having a specific tensile strength when compared to a standard. This approach differs from those prior art systems that focus on one characteristic (molecular weight) of one of the materials (encapsulating material) used to produce the delivery system. In this manner, a delivery system is formulated to express a desired release profile by adjusting and modifying the tensile strength through the specific selection of the active component, the encapsulating material, the additives, the amount of the active component and the like which can be compared to at least one, typically a plurality of standard delivery systems each having a known release rate. Once a desired tensile strength is chosen, any delivery system which has the desired tensile strength may be used without being limited to a particular encapsulating material and its molecular weight. The formulation process can be extended to encapsulating materials which exhibit similar physical and chemical properties as the encapsulating material forming part of the standard delivery system.
As used herein, the term “tensile strength” means the maximum stress a material subjected to a stretching load can withstand without tearing. A standard method for measuring tensile strength of a given substance is defined by the American Society of Testing Materials in method number ASTM-D638.
In accordance with the present invention, the selection of a desired tensile strength within a desirable range enables the production of edible compositions using a range of materials including encapsulating materials without having to focus on a particular encapsulating material and without being limited to modifying the release rate solely through the selection of a molecular weight for the encapsulating material.
The following drawings are illustrative of embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention as encompassed by the claims forming part of the application.
In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a delivery system for inclusion in an edible composition such as a chewing gum composition or confectionery composition having at least one active component encapsulated by an encapsulating material wherein the delivery system has a tensile strength of at least 6,500 psi, and typically ranging from about 6,500 psi to 200,000 psi.
In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided an edible composition such as a chewing gum composition or a confectionery composition comprising at least one edible composition-forming component and a delivery system comprising at least one active component encapsulated within an encapsulating material, the delivery system having a tensile strength of at least 6,500 psi.
In a still further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of preparing a target delivery system for an edible composition comprising combining at least one active component, at least one encapsulating material, and optionally at least one additive until a preselected tensile strength of the target delivery system is obtained based on comparison with the tensile strength of at least one sample delivery system having the same or similar active component and a known release rate of the active component.
There is also provided a method of preparing a target delivery system for an edible composition useful for delivering at least one active component at a desired release rate, said method comprising the step of encapsulating the at least one active component in an encapsulating material in a manner that provides the target delivery system with a tensile strength of at least 6,500 psi.
Still further there is provided a method of preparing a target delivery system for an edible composition useful for delivering at least one active component at a desired release rate, said method comprising encapsulating the at least one active component in an encapsulating material in a manner that provides the target delivery system with a target tensile strength associated with the desired release rate, enabling the delivery system to release the at least one active component form the edible composition at the desired release rate.
In addition, there is provided a method of preparing an edible composition containing a target delivery system useful for delivering at least one active component at a desired release rate, said method comprising encapsulating the at least one active component in an encapsulating material in a manner that provides the target delivery system with a target tensile strength associated with the desired release rate enabling the delivery system to release the at least one active component from the edible composition at desired release rate, and adding the target delivery system to the edible composition.
There is also provided edible compositions containing the present delivery system. Although the one embodiment of the present invention relates to chewing gum compositions, confectionery compositions and beverages, the present invention can be utilized to produce a variety of edible compositions including, but not limited to, food products, foodstuffs, nutrient-containing compositions, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, vitamins and other products that may be prepared for consumption by the consumer. Because the delivery system may be readily incorporated into an edible composition, the edible compositions which may benefit from and are encompassed by the present invention are wide ranging as indicated above.
The term “delivery system” as used herein is meant to encompass the encapsulating material and a single active component encapsulated therein as well as other additives used to form the delivery system as hereinafter described. It will be understood that the edible compositions of the present invention may contain a plurality of delivery systems with each delivery system containing a single active component.
The term “encapsulating material” is meant to encompass any one or more edible water insoluble materials capable of forming a solid coating or film as a protective barrier around the active component.
The present invention is directed generally to a delivery system as defined herein for use in edible compositions, which comprises an encapsulating material and an active component encapsulated by the encapsulating material. The delivery system of the present invention is formulated with a predetermined tensile strength sufficient to provide consistent controlled release of the active component over a preselected period of time such as an extended period of time. This period of time will vary depending on the type of product in which the delivery system is incorporated. One of skill in the art, based on the disclosure herein can adjust the delivery system to achieve the desired effect. An extended period of time as used herein, relates to an increased release of the active ingredient from the delivery system for over a greater period of time than previously described systems and can be at least 15 minutes, including at least 20 minutes, at least 25 minutes, at least 30 minutes, as well as all values and ranges therebetween, for example, about 25 to 30 minutes or more. Furthermore, the delivery system of the present invention also provides a way to not only deliver active agents over a prolonged period of time but also maintain an increased intensity of the active ingredient over the extended period of time. For example, if the active ingredient is a flavor or sweetener. In one aspect of the invention, the amount of active agent released can vary during the extended period of time. For example, at an early stage of delivery the amount of active component released (based on the total amount present in the delivery system at that time) can be greater than the amount of active component released during subsequent or later periods (based on the total amount present in the delivery system at that time).
In one embodiment, the extended period of time results in retaining at least about 5% of the at least one active component after 30 minutes from the start of delivering the active component in the edible composition, such as the start of chewing a chewing gum composition, including at least about 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, or more after 30 minutes. In another embodiment, the extended period of time results in retaining at least about 10% of the at least one active component after 20 minutes from the start of delivering the active component, including at least about 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50% or more after 20 minutes. In another embodiment, the extended period of time results in retaining at least about 30% of the at least one active component after 15 minutes from the start of delivering the active component, including at least about 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 75% or more after 15 minutes.
In another embodiment, using sweetener in chewing gum as an example, the extended period of time results in a perceived sweetness intensity during at least the entire period of time noted above, e.g., at least about 15 minutes, at least about 20 minutes, at least about 30 minutes, etcetera from the start of chewing the chewing gum composition.
The predetermined tensile strength is determined based, in part, on the active component and the desired release time of the same. The predetermined tensile strength may be selected from a standard comprised of one or more delivery systems with each standard delivery system having a known release rate of the desired active component. The delivery system of the present invention further provides the active component with a protective barrier against moisture and other conditions such as pH changes, reactive compounds and the like, the presence of which can undesirably degrade the active component.
The delivery system facilitates the controlled release of the active component in a wide variety of edible compositions including chewing gum compositions, food products, confectionery compositions, pharmaceutical compositions, beverages, foodstuffs, nutrient-containing compositions, vitamins, nutraceuticals and the like.
The delivery system is developed in accordance with the present invention to have a desirable tensile strength which may be selected, depending in part on the active component and the release rate of the active component desired, from a standard of known delivery systems containing the active component at known release rates. The active components which may be incorporated as part of the delivery system may be selected from sweeteners including high intensity sweeteners, acids, flavorants, pharmaceuticals, therapeutic agents, vitamins, breath fresheners, cooling agents and other materials that would benefit by coating for protection, controlled release and/or for taste masking. The active components include nicotine useful for the treatment of addiction to tobacco products and caffeine typically found in coffee and/or cola beverages. In a particularly one form of the present invention, the active component is a sweetener, for example a high intensity sweetener such as neotame and aspartame.
It has been found in accordance with the present invention that a delivery system for delivering an active component can be formulated to ensure an effective sustained release of the active component based on the type and amount of the active component and desired release rate. For example, it may be desirable to effect the controlled release of a high intensity sweetener over a period of 25 to 30 minutes to ensure against a rapid burst of sweetness which may be offensive to some consumers. A shorter controlled release time may be desirable for other type of active components such as pharmaceuticals or therapeutic agents, which may be incorporated into the same edible composition by using separate delivery systems for each active component. In accordance with the present invention, delivery systems may be formulated with a particular tensile strength associated with a range of release rates based on a standard. The standard may comprise a series of known delivery systems having tensile strengths over a range extending, for example, from low to high tensile strength values. Each of the delivery systems of the standard will be associated with a particular release rate or ranges of release rates. Thus, for example, a delivery system can be formulated with a relatively slow release rate by a fabricating a delivering system having a relatively high tensile strength. Conversely, lower tensile strength compositions tend to exhibit relatively fast release rates. One factor of the present invention is that the tensile strength of the delivery system is directly associated with the release rate of the active component without direct regard for the type or molecular weight of the encapsulating material.
In one embodiment, the present invention includes the incorporation of a plurality of delivery systems to deliver a plurality of separate active components including active components which may be desirably released at distinctly different release rates.
For example, high intensity sweeteners may desirably be released over an extended period of time (e.g. 20 to 30 minutes) while some pharmaceuticals are desirably released over a significantly shorter period of time.
In certain embodiments of the present invention, the delivery system can be prepared such that the release of the at least one active agent is at specific rates relative to the time of delivery. For example, in one embodiment, the delivery system can be prepared such that the release of the at least one active agent is released at a rate of 80% over the course of 15 minutes, 90% over the course of 20 minutes, and/or a 95% over the course of 30 minutes. In another embodiment, the delivery system can be prepared such that the one or more active agents are released at a rate of 25% over the course of 15 minutes, 50% over the course of 20 minutes and/or 75% over the course of 30 minutes.
In a one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of selecting a target delivery system containing an active component for an edible composition. The method generally includes preparing a targeted delivery system containing an active component, an encapsulating material and optional additives, with the targeted delivery system having a pre-selected tensile strength. The tensile strength of the targeted delivery system is pre-selected to provide a desirable release rate of the active component. This selection of the tensile strength is based on the tensile strengths of sample delivery systems having the same or similar active component and known release rates of the active component. In a another embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the steps of (a) obtaining a plurality of sample delivery systems comprising an active component, at least one encapsulating material, and optional additives, wherein each of the delivery systems has a different tensile strength; (b) testing the sample delivery systems to determine the respective release rates of the active component; and (c) formulating a target delivery system containing the same active component with a tensile strength corresponding to a desired release rate of the active component based on the obtained sample delivery systems.
It will be understood that a plurality of delivery systems may be prepared in this manner each containing a different active component by utilizing a comparison with standard delivery systems containing such different active components.
The method of selecting at least one delivery system suitable for incorporation into an edible composition can begin by determining a desired release rate for an active component (i.e. a first active component). The determination of the desired release rate may be from known literature or technical references or by in vitro or in vivo testing. Once the desired release rate is determined, it is typical to determine the desired tensile strength (i.e. first tensile strength) for a delivery system (i.e. first delivery system) that can release the first active component at the desired release. Once the delivery system is obtained which can deliver the active component as required it is then selected for eventual inclusion in an edible composition.
The method described above may then be repeated for a second active component and for additional active components as described via the determination and selection of a suitable delivery system.
The present method can be used in connection with formulating the target delivery system using encapsulating materials having similar physical and chemical properties including the degree of water solubility, affinity for the active component, and the like as those used in the sample delivery systems.
Applicants have discovered that by maintaining the tensile strength of the delivery system within a preselected desirable range, the active component is released from the composition in a highly controlled and consistent manner irrespective of the particular type of encapsulating materials employed. By focusing on the tensile strength of the delivery system, the process for selecting and formulating suitable delivery systems is enhanced in a manner which effectively reduces the need for trial and error experimentation typically necessary in prior art systems. The present invention, for example, enables the formulation of a suitable target delivery system by focusing on a single variable (i.e., tensile strength) and therefore takes into account all components of the delivery system including encapsulating materials and any additives (e.g., fats and oils) that may be desirably added to the formulation and enables the delivery system when added to an edible composition to release the active component at a desirable release rate.
The desired tensile strength of the delivery system can be readily determined within a desired range. In one embodiment of the present invention, the tensile strength of the delivery system is at least 6,500 psi, including 7500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 125,000, 135,000, 150,000, 165,000, 175,000, 180,000, 195,000, 200,000 and all ranges and subranges there between, for example a tensile strength range of 6,500 to 200,000 psi. The formulation of a delivery system with a desirable tensile strength can be made from a variety of encapsulating materials and at least one additive which hereinafter are referred to as “at least one tensile strength modifying agent or modifier.” The at least one additive may be used to formulate the delivery system by modifying the tensile strength of the delivery system, including tensile strength-lowering materials such as fats, emulsifiers, plasticizers (softeners), waxes, low molecular weight polymers, and the like, in addition to tensile strength increasing materials such as high molecular weight polymers. In addition, the tensile strength of the delivery system can also be fine tuned by combining different tensile strength modifiers to form the delivery system. For example, the tensile strength of high molecular weight polymers such as polyvinyl acetate may be reduced when tensile strength lowering agents such as fats and/or oils are added.
In one embodiment of the present invention, at least one tensile strength modifying agent is present in the delivery system in an amount sufficient such that the release of the one or more active agents contained in the delivery system is released at a rate of 80% over the course of 15 minutes, 90% over the course of 20 minutes, and/or a 95% over the course of 30 minutes. In another embodiment, the at least one tensile strength modifying agent is present in the delivery system in an amount sufficient such that the one or more active agents are released at a rate of 25% over the course of 15 minutes, 50% over the course of 20 minutes and/or 75% over the course of 30 minutes.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the at least one tensile strength modifying agent is present in the delivery system in an amount sufficient such that the tensile strength of the delivery system is at least about 6,500 psi, including 7500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 125,000, 135,000, 150,000, 165,000, 175,000, 180,000, 195,000, 200,000 and all ranges and subranges there between, for example a tensile strength range of 6,500 to 200,000 psi.
Examples of tensile strength modifiers or modifying agents include, but are not limited to, fats (e.g., hydrogenated or non-hydrogenated vegetable oils, animal fats), waxes (e.g., microcrystalline wax, bees wax), plasticizers/emulsifiers (e.g., mineral oil, fatty acids, mono- and diglycerides, triacetin, glycerin, acetylated monoglycerides, glycerol rosin monostearate esters), low and high molecular weight polymers (e.g., polypropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, polyisobutylene, polyethylene, polyvinylacetate) and the like, and combinations thereof. Plasticizers may also be referred to as softeners.
Thus, by employing tensile strength modifiers, the overall tensile strength of the delivery system can be adjusted or altered in such a way that a preselected tensile strength is obtained for the corresponding desired release rate of the active component from an edible composition based on a comparison with a standard.
The delivery system of the present invention is typically in the form of a powder or granules. The particle size, generally, can vary and not have a significant effect on the function of the present invention. In one embodiment the average particle size is desirably selected according to the desired rate of release and/or mouthfeel (i.e., grittiness) and the type of carrier incorporated in the edible composition. Thus, in certain embodiments of the present invention, the average particle size is from about 75 to about 600, including 100, 110, 140, 170, 200, 230, 260, 290, 320, 350, 370 and all values and ranges there between. As the values are an average one will appreciate within a given sample of powder or granules, there may be particles with sizes greater and/or less than the numerical values provided. In one embodiment of the invention, where the delivery system is incorporated into a chewing gum the particle size can be less than 600 microns.
Except as otherwise noted, the amount of the ingredients incorporated into the compositions according to the present invention is designated as % by weight based on the total weight of the composition.
The delivery systems of the present invention produce controlled release of the active components as desired through the use of a preselected tensile strength when matched with a desirable release rate selected according to the type of the active components to be encapsulated, the encapsulating material used, the additives incorporated, the desired rate of release of the active component, and the like. The materials used to encapsulate the active component are generally selected from edible water insoluble materials capable of forming a strong matrix, solid coating or film as a protective barrier around the active component. The encapsulating material is chosen in a manner consistent with the tensile strength of the delivery system which can be at least 6,500 psi, including 7500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 125,000, 135,000, 150,000, 165,000, 175,000, 180,000, 195,000, 200,000 and all ranges and subranges there between, for example a tensile strength range of 6,500 to 200,000 psi. Such encapsulating materials may be selected from polyvinyl acetate, polyethylene, crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polymethylmethacrylate, polylactidacid, polyhydroxyalkanoates, ethylcellulose, polyvinyl acetatephthalate, polyethylene glycol esters, methacrylicacid-co-methylmethacrylate, and the like, and combinations thereof.
The encapsulating material may be present in amounts of from about 0.2% to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the edible composition, including 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0, 1.25, 1.4, 1.7, 1.9, 2.2, 2.45, 2.75, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.25, 4.8, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.25, 7.75, 8.0, 8.3, 8.7, 9.0, 9.25, 9.5, 9.8 and all values and ranges there between, for example, from 1% to 5% by weight. The amount of the encapsulating material will, of course, depend in part on the amount of the active component which must be encapsulated. The amount of the encapsulating material with respect to the weight of the delivery system, is from about 30% to 99%, including 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 95, 97 and all values and ranges there between, for example, from about 60% to 90% by weight.
The tensile strength of the delivery system may be selected from relatively high tensile strengths when a relatively slow rate of release is desired and relatively lower tensile strengths when a faster rate of release is desired. Thus, when employing a tensile strength of 50,000 for a delivery system, the release rate of the active component, will generally be lower than the release rate of the active component in a delivery system having a tensile strength of 10,000 psi regardless of the type of encapsulating material (e.g. polyvinyl acetate) chosen.
In a one embodiment of the present invention, the encapsulating material is polyvinyl acetate. A representative example of a polyvinyl acetate product suitable for use as an encapsulating material in the present invention is Vinnapas® B100 sold by Wacker Polymer Systems of Adrian, Mich. A delivery system utilizing polyvinyl acetate may be prepared by melting a sufficient amount of polyvinyl acetate at a temperature of about 65° to 120° C. for a short period of time, e.g., 5 minutes. The melt temperature will depend on the type and tensile strength of the polyvinyl acetate encapsulating material where higher tensile strength materials will generally melt at higher temperatures. Once the encapsulating material is melted, a suitable amount of the active component (e.g., high intensity sweetener such as aspartame) is added and blended into the molten mass thoroughly for an additional short period of mixing. The resulting mixture is a semi-solid mass, which is then cooled (e.g., at 0° C.) to obtain a solid, and then ground to a U.S. Standard sieve size of from about 30 to 200 (600 to 75 microns). The tensile strength of the resulting delivery system can readily be tested according to ASTM-D638.
The selection of a suitable encapsulating material will also depend in part on the type and amount of the active component and the presence of other additives or ingredients. Plasticizers or softeners as well as fats and oils, for example, act as “tensile strength modifying agents” and may be incorporated into the delivery system and particularly into the encapsulating material to modify the tensile strength of the resulting delivery system. The above mentioned additives may be added to the encapsulating material during the molten state. The amount of additives used in the delivery system of the present invention will of course vary according to the desired tensile strength but will typically range up to 40% by weight based on the total weight of the delivery system.
In formulating the delivery system to have a predetermined tensile strength, the active component can be entirely encapsulated within the encapsulating material or incompletely encapsulated within the encapsulating provided the resulting tensile strength of the delivery system meets the criteria set forth hereinabove. The incomplete encapsulation can be accomplished by modifying and/or adjusting the manufacturing process to get partial coverage of the active component.
The presence of fats and oils as an additive has been found to have two effects on the delivery system. The first effect is observed at lower concentrations, i.e. up to 5% by weight, including up to 4.7, up to 4.5, up to 4.25, up to 4.0, up to 3.5, up to 3.0, up to 2.5, up to 2.25, up to 2.0, up to 1.75, up to 1.5, up to 1.0 and all values and ranges therebetween, wherein the fats and/or oils either maintain or increase the tensile strength of the delivery system. At higher concentrations (i.e., typically above 5% by weight), the fats and/or oils tend to reduce the tensile strength of the delivery system. Even with such unusual or non-linear effects on the tensile strength of the delivery system, a suitable delivery system with the desired release of the active component may be readily formulated in accordance with the present invention because the targeted delivery system is prepared based on sample delivery systems having known release rates for the active component.
Although the present description made herein relates to sweeteners, it will be understood that the effect of tensile strength on the delivery system will be similar regardless of the active component.
The sweetening agents used may be selected from a wide range of materials including water-soluble sweeteners, water-soluble artificial sweeteners, water-soluble sweeteners derived from naturally occurring water-soluble sweeteners, dipeptide based sweeteners, and protein based sweeteners, including mixtures thereof. Without being limited to particular sweeteners, representative categories and examples include:
The intense sweetening agents may be used in many distinct physical forms well-known in the art to provide an initial burst of sweetness and/or a prolonged sensation of sweetness. Without being limited thereto, such physical forms include free forms, such as spray dried, powdered, beaded forms, encapsulated forms, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the sweetener is a high intensity sweetener such as aspartame, sucralose, and acesulfame potassium (Ace-K).
The active component (e.g., sweetener), which is part of the delivery system, may be used in amounts necessary to impart the desired effect associated with use of the active component (e.g., sweetness). With respect to their presence in the delivery system, the active components may be present in amounts of from about 1% to 70% by weight based on the total weight of the delivery system, including 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65% by weight, and all values and ranges there between, for example, from about 10% to 40% by weight based on the total weight of the delivery system. For typical edible compositions including chewing gum compositions, confectionery compositions and beverage compositions, the sweeteners may be present in amounts of from about 0.1% to 6% by weight based on the total weight of the edible composition, including 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5% by weight and all values and subranges there between, for example, 0.5% to 3% by weight. The active component especially when the active component is a sweetener may also be present in the edible composition in free form depending on the release profile desired.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided edible compositions which comprise the present delivery system and a carrier in an amount appropriate to accommodate the delivery system. The term “carrier” as used herein refers to an orally acceptable vehicle such as the soluble and insoluble components of a chewing gum composition capable of being mixed with the delivery system, and which will not cause harm to warm-blooded animals including humans. The carriers further include those components of the composition that are capable of being commingled without significant interaction with the delivery system.
In a one embodiment of the present invention, the edible composition is a chewing gum composition having prolonged release (e.g., typically at least 15 minutes) of the active component. The chewing gum composition comprises a chewing gum base and the delivery system of the present invention that comprises an encapsulating material and at least one encapsulated active component such as, for example, a sweetener or a flavorant. The delivery system is present in amounts from about 0.2% to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the chewing gum composition, including 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0% by weight including all values and subranges there between, for example, from about 1% to 5% by weight.
The present invention may be incorporated with a variety of processes for preparing chewing gum compositions as known in the art. Such chewing gum compositions may be and include a variety of different formulations that are typically used to make chewing gum products. Typically, a chewing gum composition contains a chewable gum base portion, which is essentially free of water and is water insoluble and a water soluble bulk portion.
The water soluble portion is generally released from the gum base portion over a period of time during chewing. The gum base portion is retained in the mouth throughout the chewing. The water insoluble gum base generally comprises elastomers, elastomer solvents, plasticizers, waxes, emulsifiers, and inorganic fillers. Plastic polymers such as polyvinyl acetate, which behave somewhat as plasticizers, are also included. Other plastic polymers that may be used include polyvinyl laurate, crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone and polyhydroxy alkanoates.
The elastomers may constitute from about 5% to 95% by weight of the gum base. In another embodiment, the elastomers may constitute from about 10% to 70% by weight of the gum base and in another embodiment, 15% to 45% by weight of the gum base. Examples of elastomers include synthetic elastomers such as polyisobutylene, polybutylene, isobutylene-isoprene co-polymers, styrene-butadiene co-polymers, polyvinyl acetate and the like. Elastomers may also include natural elastomers such as natural rubber as well as natural gums such as jelutong, lechi caspi, perillo, massaranduba balata, chicle, gutta hang kang or combinations thereof. Other elastomers are known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Elastomer plasticizers modify the finished gum firmness when used in the gum base. Elastomer plasticizers are typically present in an amount up to 75% by weight of the gum base. In another embodiment, the elastomer plasticizers are present in an amount of from about 5% to 45% by weight of the gum base and in another embodiment from about 10% to 30% by weight of gum base. Examples of elastomer plasticizers include natural rosin esters such as glycerol ester of partially hydrogenated rosin, glycerol ester of tall oil rosin, pentaerythritol esters of partially hydrogenated rosin, methyl and partially hydrogenated methyl esters of rosin, and the like. Synthetic elastomer plasticizers such as terpene resins may also be employed in gum base composition.
Waxes include synthetic and naturally occurring waxes such as polyethylene, bees wax, carnauba and the like. Petroleum waxes such a paraffin may also be used. The waxes may be present in the amount up to 30% by weight of the gum base. Waxes aid in the curing of the finished gum and help improve the release of flavor and may further extend the shelf life of the product.
Elastomer solvents are often resins such as terpene resins. Plasticizers, sometimes referred to as softeners, are typically fats and oils, including tallow, hydrogenated vegetable oils, and cocoa butter.
Gum base typically also includes a filler component. The filler component modifies the texture of the gum base and aid processing. Examples of such fillers include magnesium and aluminum silicates, clay, alumina, talc, titanium oxide, cellulose polymers, and the like. Fillers are typically present in the amount of from 1% to 60% by weight.
Emulsifiers, which sometimes also have plasticizing properties, include glycerol monostearate, lecithin, and glycerol triacetate. Further, gum bases may also contain optional ingredients such as antioxidants, colors, and flavors.
The insoluble gum base may be present in the amount of from about 5% to 95% by weight of the chewing gum. In one embodiment, the insoluble gum base may present in the amount of from about 10% to 50% by weight of the gum base, and in another embodiment from about 20% to 40% by weight of the gum base.
Softeners are added to the chewing gum in order to optimize the chewability and mouth feel of the gum. Softeners, also known in the art as plasticizers or plasticizing agents, is generally present in amounts from about 0.5% to 15% by weight based on the total weight of the chewing gum composition. Softeners contemplated by the present invention include, for example, lecithin. Further, aqueous sweetener solutions such as those containing sorbitol, hydrogenated starch hydrolysate, corn syrup, and combinations thereof may be used as softeners and binding agents in the gum.
The chewing gum compositions of the present invention may be coated or uncoated and be in the form or slabs, sticks, pellets, balls and the like. The composition of the different forms of the chewing gum compositions will be similar but may vary with regard to the ratio of the ingredients. For example, coated gum compositions may contain a lower percentage of softeners. Pellets and balls have a small chewing gum core, which is then coated with either a sugar solution or a sugarless solution to create a hard shell. Slabs and sticks are usually formulated to be softer in texture than the chewing gum core.
In accordance with one aspect of the chewing gum composition of the present invention, the delivery system is added during the manufacture of the chewing gum composition. In another aspect of the present invention, the delivery system is added as one of the last steps, for example, the last step in the formation of the chewing gum composition. Applicants have determined that this process modification incorporates the delivery system into the gum composition without materially binding the delivery system therein such as may occur if the delivery system is mixed directly with the gum base. Thus, the delivery system, while only loosely contained within the gum composition can more effectively release the active component therefrom during a typical chewing operation. Thus, a material portion of the delivery system is free of the gum base and the corresponding ingredients of the chewing gum.
Coating techniques for applying a coating for a chewing gum composition such as pan and spray coating are well known. In one embodiment, coating with solutions adapted to build a hard candy layer can be employed. Both sugar and sugar alcohols may be used for this purpose together with high intensity sweeteners, colorants, flavorants and binders.
Other components may be added in minor amounts to the coating syrup and include moisture absorbing compounds, anti-adherent compounds, dispersing agents and film forming agents. The moisture absorbing compounds suitable for use in the coating syrups include mannitol or dicalcium phosphate. Examples of useful anti-adherent compounds, which may also function as a filler, include talc, magnesium trisilicate and calcium carbonate. These ingredients may be employed in amounts of from about 0.5% to 5% by weight of the syrup. Examples of dispersing agents, which may be employed in the coating syrup, include titanium dioxide, talc or other anti-adherent compounds as set forth above.
The coating syrup is usually heated and a portion thereof deposited on the cores. Usually a single deposition of the coating syrup is not sufficient to provide the desired amount or thickness of coating and second, third or more coats of the coating syrup may be applied to build up the weight and thickness of the coating to desired levels with layers allowed to dry in-between coats.
A method of preparing the chewing gum composition of the present invention is provided by sequentially adding the various chewing gum ingredients including the delivery system of the present invention to any commercially available mixer known in the art. After the ingredients have been thoroughly mixed, the gum base is discharged from the mixer and shaped into the desired form such as by rolling into sheets and cutting into sticks, extruding into chunks, or casing into pellets.
Generally, the ingredients are mixed by first melting the gum base and adding it to the running mixer. The base may also be melted into the mixer itself. Colors or emulsifiers may also be added at this time. A softener may be added to the mixer at this time, along with syrup and a portion of the bulking agent. Further parts of the bulking agent are then added to the mixer. Flavorants are typically added with the final portion of the bulking agent. Finally, the delivery system exhibiting a predetermeined tensile strength is added to the resulting mixture. Other optional ingredients are added in the batch in a typical fashion, well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The entire mixing procedure typically takes from five to fifteen minutes, but longer mixing times may be required. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many variations of the above-described procedure may be follows.
After the ingredients are mixed, the gum mass may be formed into a variety of shapes and products. For example, the ingredients may be formed into pellets or balls and used as cores to make a coated chewing gum product. However, any type of chewing gum product can be utilized with the present invention.
If a coated product is desired, the coating may contain ingredients such as flavorants, artificial sweeteners, dispersing agents, coloring agents, film formers and binding agents. Flavorants contemplated by the present invention, include those commonly known in the art such as essential oils, synthetic flavors, or mixtures thereof, including but are not limited to, oils derived from plants and fruits such as citrus oils, fruit essences, peppermint oil, spearmint oil, other mint oils, clove oil, oil of wintergreen, anise and the like. The flavorants may also be added to the coating syrup in an amount such that the coating may be present in amounts of from about 0.2% to 1.2% by weight flavoring agent. In another embodiment, the coating may be present in amounts, and more preferably from about 0.7% to 1.0% by weight flavoring agent.
Dispersing agents are often added to syrup coatings for the purpose of whitening and tack reduction. Dispersing agents contemplated by the present invention to be employed in the coating syrup include titanium dioxide, talc, or any other anti-stick compound. The dispersing agent may be added to the coating syrup in an amount such that the coating contains from about 0.1% to 1.0%, including 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and all values and ranges there between, for example, from about 0.3% to 0.6% by weight of the agent.
Coloring agents may be added directly to the coating syrup in dye or lake form. Coloring agents contemplated by the present invention include food quality dyes. Film formers may be added to the coating syrup include methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, and the like or combinations thereof. Binding agents may be added either as an initial coating on the chewing gum center or may be added directly to the coating syrup. Binding agents contemplated by the present invention include gum arabic, gum talha, gelatin, vegetable gums, and the like. The binding agents, when added to the coating syrup, are typically added in amounts from about 0.5% to 10% by weight.
The present invention further encompasses confectionery compositions containing the delivery system of the present invention. Confectionery compositions include, for example, compressed tablets such as mints, hard boiled candies, chocolates, chocolate containing products, nutrient bars, nougats, gels, centerfill confections, fondants, panning goods, consumable thin films and other compositions falling within the generally accepted definition of confectionery compositions.
Confectionery compositions in the form of pressed tablets such as mints may generally be made by combining finely sifted sugar or sugar substitute, flavoring agent (e.g. peppermint flavor) bulking agent such as gum arabic, and an optional coloring agent. The flavoring agent, bulking agent are combined and then gradually the sugar or sugar substitute are added along with a coloring agent if needed.
The product is then granulated by passing through a seize of desired mesh size (e.g. 12 mesh) and then dried typically at temperatures of from about 55° C. to 60° C. The resulting powder is fed into a tableting machine fitted with a large size punch and the resulting pellets are broken into granules and then pressed.
High boiled candies typically contain sugar or sugar substitute, glucose, water, flavoring agent and optional coloring agent. The sugar is dissolved in the water and glucose is then added. The mixture is brought to a boil. The resulting liquid to which may previously have been added a coloring agent is poured onto an oiled slab and cooled. The flavoring agent are then added and kneaded into the cooled mass. The resulting mixture is then fed to a drop roller assembly known in the art to form the final hard candy shape.
A nougat composition typically includes two principal components, a high boiled candy and a frappe. By way of example, egg albumen or substitute thereof is combined with water and whisked to form a light foam. Sugar and glucose are added to water and boiled typically at temperatures of from about 130° C. to 140° C. and the resulting boiled product is poured into a mixing machine and beat until creamy.
The beaten albumen and flavoring agent are combined with the creamy product and the combination is thereafter thoroughly mixed.
Further details regarding the preparation of confectionery compositions can be found in Skuse's Complete Confectioner (13th Edition) (1957) including pp. 41-71, 133-144, and 255-262; and Sugar Confectionery Manufacture (2nd Edition) (1995), E. B. Jackson, Editor, pp. 129-168, 169-188, 189-216, 218-234, and 236-258 each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The following study shows the effect of the presence of oil or fats on the overall tensile strength of one embodiment of the delivery system of the present invention. The rate of release of the active component (i.e., aspartame) is affected by the variation in tensile strength such that the release rate of the higher tensile strength delivery system is generally slower than the release rate of lower tensile strength formulations. When relatively large amounts of oil or fat are used, the tensile strength of the delivery system is generally lowered which increases the release rate of the active component. Conversely, reduced amounts of fats or oils are employed typically for higher tensile strength delivery systems exhibiting lower release rates.
Preparation of the Delivery Systems
Four delivery systems for delivering a high intensity sweetener (i.e., aspartame) containing varying amounts of polyvinyl acetate, and oils or fat were prepared in accordance with the formulations shown in Table 1.
Polyvinyl acetate was melted at a temperature of about 110° C. in a continuous extruder. The hydrogenated oil and glycerol monostearate (fat) were added to the molten polyvinyl acetate. Aspartame was then added to the resulting mixture and mixed under high shear to completely disperse the ingredients. The resulting extrudate was cooled and then sized to a particle size of less than 420 microns to produce the corresponding delivery system containing the encapsulated high intensity sweetener aspartame as the active component. The tensile strength of each of the final delivery systems was measured in accordance with ASTM Standard D638-02a and is shown in Table 1.
As indicated in Table 1, the addition of fats and oils exhibits two effects on the tensile strength of the delivery system when a portion of the encapsulating material (polyvinyl acetate) is replaced by the fats and oils. As shown by a comparison of delivery system no. 3 to delivery system no. 4, there is a sharp increase in tensile strength when 5% by weight of polyvinyl acetate is replaced by a corresponding amounts of fats and oils. When the replacement is 10% by weight the tensile strength drops significantly but remains above the level of the fat and oil free delivery system (delivery system no. 1). When fats and oils are used in relatively large amounts (i.e., 20% by weight), the delivery system tends to exhibit a much lower tensile strength as compared to delivery system no. 3.
Preparation of the Chewing Gums
Three sample chewing gum compositions were prepared using the ingredients listed in Table 2 and incorporating delivery system nos. 1 through 3 as shown in Table 1.
The chewing gum composition was prepared as follows. The gum base was melted at a suitable temperature in a mixer. The remaining ingredients were then added to the melted gum base and mixed until the ingredients were completely dispersed. The resulting chewing gum composition was sized and conditioned for about 1 week and evaluated using a pool of human subjects. Each of the human subjects were asked to sample the chewing gum compositions by chewing each of the samples listed in Table 2 and rating the sweetness intensity of each sample at 10 minute intervals over a 30 minute time period. The resulting data is shown in
Results
As shown in
It will be understood that each of the chewing gum compositions prepared in accordance with Example 1 could readily be modified to include one or more additional delivery systems each containing a different active component.
The following study examined the relationship between tensile strength of the delivery system and the release rate of the encapsulated active component. The presence of fats or oils were varied to modify the tensile strength of the delivery system, thereby allowing the release rate of the encapsulated active component to be adjusted as desired.
Preparation of the Delivery Systems
Four delivery systems were prepared using the ingredients listed in Table 3.
The above delivery systems (i.e., delivery system nos. 4 to 7) were prepared in the following manner. The polyvinyl acetate encapsulating materials were melted at a temperature of about 110° C. in a continuous extruder. Hydrogenated oil and glycerol monostearate were added to the molten encapsulating materials. The sweetener was then added to the resulting mixture. The mixture was thoroughly mixed under high shear to completely disperse the ingredients to yield an extrudate. The mixed extrudate was thereafter allowed to cool and comminuted to yield particles of the respective delivery systems having a particle size of about less than 600 microns. The delivery systems were each formulated to exhibit a specific tensile strength, in part based on the amount and strength of the polyvinyl acetate and the amount of the fats and oils and other components. The tensile strength of each of delivery system nos. 4 through 7 is listed in Table 3.
Preparation of Chewing Gum Samples
Two test samples of chewing gum compositions referred to herein as Gums 4 and 5 were prepared and formulated with the ingredients listed in Table 4 below. Gum 4 was formulated with a combination of delivery system nos. 5 and 6 shown in Table 3 in the specified amounts to yield a chewing gum having a relatively low tensile strength delivery system. Gum 5 was formulated with a combination of delivery system nos. 4 and 7 in the specified amounts to yield a chewing gum having a relatively high tensile strength delivery system.
The above test sample chewing gums were each prepared in the following manner. The gum base was melted in a mixer. The remaining ingredients were added to the melted gum base. The melted gum base was mixed to completely disperse the ingredients. The resulting chewing gum was allowed to cool. The cooled chewing gum was sized and conditioned for about a week.
It will be understood that each of the chewing gum compositions prepared in accordance with Example 2 could readily be modified to include one or more additional delivery systems each containing a different active component.
Sweetness and Bitterness Intensity Analysis
A pool of human subjects was assembled to taste and rate the sweetness intensity of the chewing gum test samples over time. Each of the human subjects were asked to sample by chewing the test sample gums 4 and 5 over a 30 minute period. At each 5-minute interval, the human subjects were asked to rate the perceived sweetness intensity of the chewing gum sampled on a scale of 1 to 10. The results are shown in
Further to measuring sweetness intensity as perceived by the humans subjects during the chewing, the human subjects were also asked to rate the perceived bitterness intensity of the chewing on a similar scale of 1 to 10. The results are shown in
Residual Sweetener Analysis
The chewing gums chewed by the human subjects were also subjected to chemical analysis at 5-minute intervals to measure the amount of the residual sweetener remaining in the gum bolus. Every 5 minutes over the 30-minute period, the bolus of the chewing gum was retrieved from each of the human subjects and tested by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results are shown in
Results
Descriptive Panel Results
As shown in
As shown in
Human Chew-out/Residual Aspartame
As shown in
The forgoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion, and from the accompanying claims, that various changes, modifications, and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1633336 | Larson | Jun 1927 | A |
1936456 | Larson | Nov 1933 | A |
1952886 | O'Brien | Mar 1934 | A |
2191199 | Hall | Feb 1940 | A |
2197719 | Conner | Apr 1940 | A |
2876167 | Manahan | Mar 1959 | A |
2886440 | Kramer et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886441 | Kramer et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886442 | Kramer et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886443 | Rosenthal et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886444 | Rosenthal et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886445 | Rosenthal et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886446 | Kramer et al. | May 1959 | A |
2886449 | Rosenthal et al. | May 1959 | A |
3004897 | Shore | Oct 1961 | A |
3052552 | Koener et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3117027 | Lindlof et al. | Jan 1964 | A |
3124459 | Erwin et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3159585 | Evans et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3241520 | Wurster et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3341416 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3475533 | Mayrand et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3538230 | Pader et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3664962 | Kelly et al. | May 1972 | A |
3664963 | Pasin | May 1972 | A |
3677771 | Kolar, Jr. | Jul 1972 | A |
3691090 | Kitajima et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3795744 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3819838 | Smith et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3821417 | Westall et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3826847 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3857964 | Yolles | Dec 1974 | A |
3862307 | Di Giulio | Jan 1975 | A |
3872021 | McKnight | Mar 1975 | A |
3878938 | Venables et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3897566 | Bahoshy et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3912817 | Sapsowitz | Oct 1975 | A |
3930026 | Clark | Dec 1975 | A |
3943258 | Bahoshy et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3962416 | Katzen | Jun 1976 | A |
3962463 | Witzel | Jun 1976 | A |
3974293 | Witzel | Aug 1976 | A |
3984574 | Comollo | Oct 1976 | A |
4032661 | Rowsell et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4033994 | Watson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4037000 | Burge et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4045581 | Mackay et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4059118 | Watson et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4060091 | Watson et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4070449 | Rowsell et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4083995 | Mitchell et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4107360 | Schmidgall | Aug 1978 | A |
4130638 | Dhabhar et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4136163 | Watson et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4139639 | Bahoshy et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4148872 | Wagenknecht et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4150112 | Wagenknecht et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4156715 | Wagenknecht et al. | May 1979 | A |
4156716 | Wagenknecht et al. | May 1979 | A |
4157385 | Wagenknecht et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4159315 | Wagenknecht et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4160054 | Wagenknecht et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4160820 | Wagenknecht et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4187320 | Koch et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4193936 | Watson et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4208431 | Friello et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4217368 | Witzel et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4224345 | Tezuka et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4230688 | Rowsell et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4271197 | Hopkins et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4271199 | Cherukuri et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4276312 | Merritt | Jun 1981 | A |
4295845 | Sepulveda et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4314990 | Denny, Jr. et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4340583 | Wason | Jul 1982 | A |
4352822 | Cherukuri et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4352823 | Cherukuri et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4352825 | Cherukuri et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4363756 | Sepulveda et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4370350 | Fisher et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4384004 | Cea et al. | May 1983 | A |
4386106 | Merritt et al. | May 1983 | A |
4388328 | Glass | Jun 1983 | A |
4452821 | Gergely | Jun 1984 | A |
4457857 | Sepulveda et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4459425 | Amano et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4472437 | Corsello et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4485118 | Carroll et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4497832 | Cherukuri et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4513012 | Carroll et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4515769 | Marritt et al. | May 1985 | A |
4518615 | Cherukuri et al. | May 1985 | A |
4568560 | Schobel | Feb 1986 | A |
4585649 | Lynch | Apr 1986 | A |
4590075 | Wei et al. | May 1986 | A |
4597970 | Sharma et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4613512 | Barnett et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4614649 | Gorman et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4614654 | Ream et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4627987 | Barnett et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4634593 | Stroz et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4663152 | Barth et al. | May 1987 | A |
4673577 | Patel | Jun 1987 | A |
4711784 | Yang | Dec 1987 | A |
4722845 | Cherukuri et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4726953 | Carroll et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740376 | Yang | Apr 1988 | A |
4741905 | Huzinec | May 1988 | A |
4749575 | Rotman | Jun 1988 | A |
4751095 | Karl et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4752481 | Dokuzovic | Jun 1988 | A |
4753790 | Silva et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4764382 | Kydonieus et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4771784 | Kozin et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4786502 | Chapura et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4800087 | Mehta | Jan 1989 | A |
4803082 | Cherukuri et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4804548 | Sharma et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4816265 | Cherukuri et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4822599 | Mitra | Apr 1989 | A |
4824681 | Schobel et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828845 | Zamudio-Tena et al. | May 1989 | A |
4828857 | Sharma et al. | May 1989 | A |
4842762 | Sabol, Jr. et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4863745 | Zibell | Sep 1989 | A |
4871570 | Barnett et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4904482 | Patel et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911934 | Yang et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4915958 | Faust et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4918182 | Jackson et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4919841 | Kamel et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923684 | Ibrahim et al. | May 1990 | A |
4927646 | Jenner et al. | May 1990 | A |
4929447 | Yang | May 1990 | A |
4931293 | Cherukuri et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4933190 | Cherukuri et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4940588 | Sparks et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4952402 | Sparks et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4952407 | Record et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4954353 | Cherukuri et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4971797 | Cherukuri et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4971806 | Cherukuri et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978537 | Song | Dec 1990 | A |
4981698 | Cherukuri et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4985236 | Ibrahim et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986991 | Yatka et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997659 | Yatka et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004595 | Cherukuri et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009893 | Cherukuri et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009900 | Levine et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5017385 | Wienecke | May 1991 | A |
5035882 | Hussein et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5041294 | Patel | Aug 1991 | A |
5043154 | Gaffar et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043169 | Cherukuri et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5057327 | Yatka et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5057328 | Cherukuri et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059429 | Cherukuri et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064658 | Cherukuri et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5073389 | Wienecke | Dec 1991 | A |
5080877 | Chane-Ching et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5082671 | Cherukuri | Jan 1992 | A |
5084278 | Mehta | Jan 1992 | A |
5096699 | Gaffar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5096701 | White, Jr. et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100678 | Reed et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108763 | Chau et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5126151 | Bodor et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139793 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139794 | Patel et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139798 | Yatka et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154939 | Broderick et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158790 | Witkewitz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5164210 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169657 | Yatka et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5169658 | Yatka et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174514 | Prodi | Dec 1992 | A |
5176900 | White, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5198251 | Song et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5202112 | Prencipe et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208009 | Gaffar et al. | May 1993 | A |
5226335 | Sitte et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5227154 | Reynolds | Jul 1993 | A |
5227182 | Song et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5229148 | Copper | Jul 1993 | A |
5240710 | Bar-Shalom et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5244670 | Upson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5256402 | Prencipe et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5266335 | Cherukuri et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266592 | Grub et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5273741 | Gaftar et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284659 | Cherukuri et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5300283 | Prencipe et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5300305 | Stapler et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5334375 | Nabi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5334396 | Yatka | Aug 1994 | A |
5336509 | McGrew et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352439 | Norfleet et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5364627 | Song | Nov 1994 | A |
5372824 | Record et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380530 | Hill | Jan 1995 | A |
5385729 | Prencipe et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391315 | Ashkin | Feb 1995 | A |
5405604 | Hall | Apr 1995 | A |
5407665 | McLaughlin et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413799 | Song et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415880 | Song et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429827 | Song et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5431930 | Patel et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437876 | Synosky et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5437878 | Panhorst et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451404 | Furman | Sep 1995 | A |
5458879 | Singh et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5462754 | Synosky et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474787 | Grey et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480668 | Nofre et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487902 | Andersen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494689 | Lee et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5498378 | Tsaur et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501864 | Song et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503823 | Norfleet et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5505933 | Norfleet et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5523098 | Synosky et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532004 | Bell et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545424 | Nakatsu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5582816 | Mandanas et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589160 | Rice | Dec 1996 | A |
5589194 | Tsuei et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599527 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603920 | Rice | Feb 1997 | A |
5603971 | Porzio et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5618517 | Miskewitz | Apr 1997 | A |
5626892 | Kehoe et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629035 | Miskewitz | May 1997 | A |
5633027 | Cherukuri et al. | May 1997 | A |
5637618 | Kurtz et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645821 | Libin | Jul 1997 | A |
5651958 | Rice | Jul 1997 | A |
5658553 | Rice | Aug 1997 | A |
5676932 | Wason et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693334 | Miskewitz | Dec 1997 | A |
5698215 | Kalili et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702687 | Miskewitz | Dec 1997 | A |
5713738 | Yarborough | Feb 1998 | A |
5716601 | Rice | Feb 1998 | A |
5725865 | Mane et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5736175 | Cea et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5741524 | Staniforth et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744180 | Cherukuri et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756074 | Ascioone et al. | May 1998 | A |
5783725 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5789002 | Duggan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800848 | Yatka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824291 | Howard | Oct 1998 | A |
5853758 | Lo | Dec 1998 | A |
5866166 | Staniforth et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5869028 | McGill et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879728 | Graff et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5912007 | Pan et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939051 | Santalucia et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5942211 | Harper et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6027746 | Lech | Feb 2000 | A |
6056992 | Lew | May 2000 | A |
6159509 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174514 | Cherukuri et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190591 | Van Lengerich | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190644 | McClanahan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6239690 | Burbidge et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261540 | Nelson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290933 | Durga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306429 | Beanlin-Kelly | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6365209 | Cherukuri | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6379654 | Gebreselassie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6413573 | Reichart et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416744 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428827 | Song et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436461 | Boumeesters et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6471945 | Luo et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475469 | Montgomery | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479071 | Holme et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485739 | Luo et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6506366 | Leinen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6534091 | Garces Garces et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537595 | Hyodo et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555093 | Alvarez Hernandez | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555145 | Cherukuri | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6599542 | Abdel-Malik et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6623266 | Jani et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627233 | Wolf et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6673844 | Kumamoto et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685916 | Holme et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692778 | Yatka et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6696044 | Luo et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717167 | Noda | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6759066 | Savage et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6780443 | Nakatsu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6838106 | Kumamoto et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6974597 | Ohta et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6998144 | Merkel et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022352 | Castro et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025999 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7189760 | Erman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7507427 | Andersen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8389031 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8389032 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8591968 | Boghani et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591972 | Boghani et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591973 | Boghani et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591974 | Boghani et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597703 | Boghani et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010008635 | Quellet et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010021404 | Uhlemann et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020044968 | Van Lengerich | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020122842 | Seielstad | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150616 | Gerebern | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004215 | Van Laere et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030077362 | Panhorst | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097088 | Pacetti | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099740 | Colle | May 2003 | A1 |
20030113274 | Holme | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030236183 | De Bruijn et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022817 | Tardi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040136928 | Holme | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040175489 | Clark et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050019445 | Wolf et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025721 | Holme | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050112236 | Boghani | May 2005 | A1 |
20050196503 | Srivastava | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196517 | Hodanko et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202143 | Roy et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050208084 | Ley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210306 | Rich | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214348 | Boghani | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220867 | Boghani | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260266 | Gebreselassie et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060034897 | Boghani | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060068057 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068059 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060177383 | Gebreselassie et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060251768 | Bouquerand | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263474 | Luo | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070036733 | Spence et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048424 | Moza et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080063747 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080160138 | Boghani et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166449 | Kabse et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187621 | Boghani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199564 | Boghani et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090022846 | Wittorff et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090074911 | Boghani et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089167 | Boghani et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098252 | Boghani et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090130250 | Andersen et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090162418 | Boghani et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090175982 | Boghani et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090220642 | Boghani et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100028452 | Boghani et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1208966 | May 1986 | CA |
2238925 | Nov 1999 | CA |
0 067 595 | Dec 1982 | EP |
0132444 | Feb 1985 | EP |
0 252 374 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0 255 260 | Feb 1988 | EP |
0 273 009 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0 434 321 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0 453 397 | Oct 1991 | EP |
875763 | Aug 1961 | GB |
1351761 | Jan 1972 | GB |
1444024 | Jul 1996 | GB |
2388581 | Nov 2003 | GB |
63-245638 | Oct 1988 | JP |
63-273947 | Oct 1988 | JP |
20803030 | Mar 1990 | JP |
2623769 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9309822 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10-512862 | Dec 1998 | JP |
8503414 | Aug 1985 | WO |
8800463 | Jan 1988 | WO |
9829088 | Jul 1988 | WO |
8903170 | Apr 1989 | WO |
8911212 | Nov 1989 | WO |
9004926 | May 1990 | WO |
9013994 | Nov 1990 | WO |
9107104 | May 1991 | WO |
9202145 | Feb 1992 | WO |
9206160 | Apr 1992 | WO |
9322939 | Nov 1993 | WO |
9507683 | Mar 1995 | WO |
9511671 | May 1995 | WO |
9533034 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9619193 | Jun 1996 | WO |
9617524 | Jun 1996 | WO |
9620608 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9622080 | Jul 1996 | WO |
9702009 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9702011 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9702273 | Jan 1997 | WO |
9706695 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9724036 | Jul 1997 | WO |
9803076 | Jan 1998 | WO |
9818339 | May 1998 | WO |
9823165 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9913870 | Mar 1999 | WO |
9915032 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9827798 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9922798 | Jun 1999 | WO |
9943294 | Sep 1999 | WO |
9959428 | Nov 1999 | WO |
9962354 | Dec 1999 | WO |
0001253 | Jan 2000 | WO |
0035296 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0035298 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0036924 | Jun 2000 | WO |
0069282 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0075274 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0176384 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0191571 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0247489 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02055649 | Jul 2002 | WO |
03020047 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03063604 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2004006967 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2004010998 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004010998 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2004064544 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004077956 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2005016022 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005051427 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2006079056 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006089200 | Aug 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of JP 2623769 B2. |
Machine Translation of JP 2623769B, Nov. 21, 2009. |
Lubliner, Plasticity Theory, Chapter 2, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/913,267, filed Oct. 31, 2007, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/302,255, filed Dec. 14, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,367, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,368, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,480, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,371, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,370, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,356, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,365, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,364, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,369, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,909, filed Jun. 28, 2007, Boghani, et al. |
JP 2083030 A, Publication date: Mar. 23, 1990, Abstract, 1 page. |
“CAPROL®3GO CAS No. 9007-48-1” XP002401201. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.abietccorp.com/documents/3go-17—000.pdf> [retrieved on Sep. 28, 2006]. |
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, Application No. 2006800096900, Applicant: Cadbury Adams USA LLC, Title of Invention: Controlled Release Oral Delivery Systems, Notification of the First Office Action, Date: Feb. 5, 2010, 10 pages. |
DE19653100 A1, Jul. 23, 1998, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
Demmers et al., “Effect of Surfacants and Proteolytic Enzymes on Artificial Calculus Formation”, Surfacents and Enzymes, Calculus, Aug. 1867, pp. 28-30. |
Emulsifiers With HLB Values, Last Accessed Sep. 27, 2011, pp. 1-3, http://www.theherbarie.com/files/resource-center/formulating/Emulsifiers—HLB—Values.pdf. |
European Patent Office, Application No. 06 717 548.9 1221; Ref. MG/P/85286, EP Office Communication dated: May 3, 2010, 4 pages. |
ES2080703 A1, Feb. 1, 1996, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
GANTREZ® AN; ISP Polymers for Oral Care; Products and Properties, last downloaded from http://www.ispcorp.com/products/oralcare/content/brochure/oral/prod.html on Jun. 9, 2004, 5 pages. |
Hercules Incorporated, Technical Information Bulletin VC-566C, 2000, 6 pages. |
“HLB Systems” [Online] pp. 1-4, XP002401202. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://pharmcal.tripod.com/ch17.htm. [retrieved on Sep. 28, 2006]. |
JP02227044, Sep. 10, 1990, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
JP6079165 A, Mar. 22, 1994, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
JP8308500 A, Nov. 26, 1996, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
JP9309822 A, Dec. 2, 1997, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
Leffingwell, John C., “Cool without Menthol & Cooler than menthol and Cooling compounds as Insect Repellents” From the Internet: URL: http://www.leffingwell.com/cooler—than—menthol.htm [updated Apr. 5, 2006]. |
McClements, “Food Emulsions, Principles, Practices, and Techniques”, 2005, Contemporary Food Science, 2nd Edition, Title pages and p. 132, 3 pages. |
Ottinger et al., “Quantitative Modle Studies on the Efficiency of Precursors in the Formation of Cooling-Active 1-Pyrrolidinyl-2-cyclopenten-1-ones and Bitter-Tasting Cyclopenta-[b]azepin-8(1H)-ones”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 2002; pp. 5156-5161. |
Ovejero-Lopez et al., “Flavor Release Measurement from Gum Model System”, J. Argic. Food Chem. 52, 2004, pp. 8119-8126. |
Parikh et al., “Tensile Properties of Free Fillms Cast from Aqueous Ethylcellulose Dispersions”, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 10, No. 6, 1993, pp. 810-815. |
Prencipe et al., “Squeezing out a better toothpaste”, ChemTech., 1999, 7 pages. |
Rassing, “Chewing gum as a drug delivery system”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 13, 1994, pp. 89-121. |
R085679 A2, Oct. 31, 1984, Abstract Only, 1 page. |
CA2544512 Office Action, dated July 27, 2011, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050220867 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2004/037185 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11083968 | US | |
Parent | 10719298 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | PCT/US2004/037185 | US |