Delivery system for active components as part of an edible composition having preselected tensile strength

Abstract
A delivery system for inclusion in an edible composition is formulated to have at least one active component encapsulated within an encapsulating material, whereby the delivery system has a tensile strength suitable for delivering the active component at a desired release rate.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally directed to a delivery system for edible compositions in which a desired active component is encapsulated in a manner such that the tensile strength of the delivery system is within a desirable range to provide controlled release of the active component in a consistent manner over an extended period of time.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Encapsulating active components in edible compositions to prolong their release and/or to slow their degradation is known. Encapsulating materials used to coat such components include, for example, cellulose, cellulose derivatives, arabinogalactin, gum arabic, polyolefins, waxes, vinyl polymers, gelatin, zein and mixtures thereof. The encapsulating materials have been used to protect active components such as sweeteners, acids, flavorings, soluble dietary fibers, biologically active agents such as pharmaceutical compounds or medicinal drugs, breath freshening agents, and the like.


Attempts have been made to encapsulate active components such as sweeteners, particularly high intensity sweeteners to prevent against premature degradation, to enhance the uniformity of release, and to prolong release in a controlled manner. High intensity sweeteners generally have a sweetening intensity greater than sugar (sucrose) and a caloric value lower than that of sugar at equivalent sweetness levels. It is especially desirable to control the release of high intensity sweeteners in compositions since the high sweetness levels can easily overwhelm the consumer. Moreover, the controlled release of the sweetener provides desirable masking of unpleasant tasting materials. Because each high intensity sweetener is chemically and physically distinct, each is a challenge to use in an edible composition and each exhibits one or more shortcomings, which may be moderated by encapsulation.


For example, many high intensity sweeteners lose their sweetness intensity rapidly when used in edible compositions such as chewing gums and confections. Encapsulation can modulate and prolong release to provide a more desirable taste profile. Some high intensity sweeteners such as saccharin, stevioside, acesulfame-K, glycyrrhizin, and thaumatin have an associated bitter taste or off-note. Certain high intensity sweeteners are also unstable in the presence of certain chemicals including aldehydes and ketones, and sensitive to exposure to environmental conditions including moisture. Solid sucralose is known to turn dark during prolong storage upon exposure to heat and ambient air. Encapsulation can be used to isolate unstable compounds to prevent degradation and prolong shelf life.


Typically, the taste profile of a high intensity sweetener can be described as a rapid burst of sweetness. Usually, high intensity sweeteners reach their peak sweet taste rapidly, with the intensity of sweet taste rapidly declining soon thereafter. The initial rapid burst can be unpleasant to many consumers as the strong sweet taste tends to overpower the other flavors that may be present in the edible composition. The relatively rapid loss of sweetness can also result in a bitter aftertaste. For this reason, it is typically desirable to encapsulate high intensity sweeteners with an encapsulating material in order to modulate and prolong the release rate and to chemically stabilize and enhance the overall taste profile. The selection of a suitable encapsulating material (i.e., polyvinyl acetate) has usually been focused on the molecular weight of the encapsulating material with higher molecular weights generally associated with longer release times.


By way of example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,711,784 to Yang discloses a chewing gum composition containing a high molecular weight polyvinyl acetate blended with a hydrophobic plasticizer as an encapsulating material. The encapsulating material is used to encapsulate an active ingredient such as aspartame.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,265 to Cherukuri et al. discloses a sweetener delivery system, which uses a coating composed of an emulsifier and a polyvinyl acetate encapsulating material having a molecular weight of from about 2,000 to 14,000, optionally in the presence of a wax. The coating is applied to sweeteners such as aspartame to effectuate sustained release of the sweetener.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,328 to Cherukuri et al. discloses a food acid delivery system for use in for example, chewing gums, having a food acid that is encapsulated in a matrix comprising an emulsifier and polyvinyl acetate in a specified molecular weight range.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,763 to Chau et al. discloses a sweetening agent delivery system having prolonged sweetener release. The system utilizes a high intensity sweetener encapsulated in polyvinyl acetate having a molecular weight in the range of from about 2,000 to 100,000. The system further includes the use of a plasticizing agent, a waxy material and an emulsifying agent.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,002 to Duggan et al. discloses a process for preparing sweeteners and acids as ingredients for chewing gum compositions. In particular, the Duggan et al. reference discloses encapsulating the sweetener or acid in a delivery system such as polyvinyl acetate.


U.S. patent application Ser. No. 2002/0122842 filed by Seiestad et al. discloses food mixtures including chewing gums containing at least two acids encapsulated by a polyvinyl acetate matrix. The polyvinyl acetate has a molecular weight in the range of from about 20,000 to 120,000.


The prior art systems identified above prepare encapsulating materials by taking into account the selection of an encapsulating material (e.g. polyvinyl acetate) and its molecular weight.


Since polyvinyl acetate is the most common encapsulating material, the molecular weight of the material becomes a critical feature in the making of prior art delivery systems. Thus, the state of the art for encapsulating active components especially high intensity sweeteners essentially associates controlled release of the active component with the molecular weight of the encapsulating material. However, this approach is limited in that the predictable modification of the controlled release of the active agent is made only through the modification of the molecular weight of the encapsulating material. There is no predictable modification based on the use of other encapsulating materials and/or additives that may be employed in the preparation of suitable delivery systems. Thus, there is no comprehensive approach to the production of a desirable delivery system that can provide a desirable release rate of an active component without engaging in a significant amount of trial and error experimentation.


It would therefore be a significant advance in the art to provide a process of producing delivery systems for the desirable release of an active component so that regardless of the type of the composition of the delivery system it will be suitable for the particular application (e.g., the controlled delivery of a high intensity sweetener).


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a new approach to the controlled release of an active component in edible compositions such as, for example, chewing gum and confectionery compositions. The active component(s) and materials used to encapsulate the same provide a delivery system(s) that enables exceptional control of the release of the active component over a wide range of delivery systems and takes into account the use of a range of encapsulating materials and additives that may be used to formulate the delivery system. The delivery system is formulated based on tensile strength as the prime factor in formulating a delivery system that can deliver a designated active component at a desirable release rate. The encapsulated active components are preserved until release is desirable and therefore protected against moisture, reactive compounds, pH changes and the like. When the active component is a sweetener, the delivery system is tailored to the sweetener to provide consistent sustained release, thus extending the time the sweetener is released to provide an edible composition which provides a long lasting desirable taste profile, increased salivation and overall enjoyment of the taste imparted therefrom without the disadvantage of prior art systems in which the sweetener may be released at less or more than a desirable rate.


The present invention is premised on the discovery that the tensile strength of the delivery system provides a desired controlled, extended release of an active component. As a result, a delivery system can be readily and easily formulated using a broad range of materials (e.g., encapsulating agents, active components, additives) with the desired characteristics to achieve a particular desirable release rate. The active components and materials used to encapsulate the same provide a delivery system that provides exceptional control of the release of the active component.


It has been found in accordance with the present invention that a delivery system for active components can be provided based on the tensile strength of the delivery system having a specific tensile strength when compared to a standard. This approach differs from those prior art systems that focus on one characteristic (molecular weight) of one of the materials (encapsulating material) used to produce the delivery system. In this manner, a delivery system is formulated to express a desired release profile by adjusting and modifying the tensile strength through the specific selection of the active component, the encapsulating material, the additives, the amount of the active component and the like which can be compared to at least one, typically a plurality of standard delivery systems each having a known release rate. Once a desired tensile strength is chosen, any delivery system which has the desired tensile strength may be used without being limited to a particular encapsulating material and its molecular weight. The formulation process can be extended to encapsulating materials which exhibit similar physical and chemical properties as the encapsulating material forming part of the standard delivery system.


As used herein, the term “tensile strength” means the maximum stress a material subjected to a stretching load can withstand without tearing. A standard method for measuring tensile strength of a given substance is defined by the American Society of Testing Materials in method number ASTM-D638.


In accordance with the present invention, the selection of a desired tensile strength within a desirable range enables the production of edible compositions using a range of materials including encapsulating materials without having to focus on a particular encapsulating material and without being limited to modifying the release rate solely through the selection of a molecular weight for the encapsulating material.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following drawings are illustrative of embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention as encompassed by the claims forming part of the application.



FIG. 1 is a graph comparing perceived sweetness intensity of three samples of gum over a 30 minute period in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a graph comparing perceived sweetness intensity of two samples of gum each containing different tensile strength delivery systems over a 30 minute period in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a graph comparing the percentage of aspartame retained over a period of time for two samples of gum containing different tensile strength delivery systems in accordance with the present invention; and



FIG. 4 is a graph comparing perceived bitterness intensity of two gum samples each containing different tensile strength delivery systems in accordance with the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a delivery system for inclusion in an edible composition such as a chewing gum composition or confectionery composition having at least one active component encapsulated by an encapsulating material wherein the delivery system has a tensile strength of at least 6,500 psi, and typically ranging from about 6,500 psi to 200,000 psi.


In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided an edible composition such as a chewing gum composition or a confectionery composition comprising at least one edible composition-forming component and a delivery system comprising at least one active component encapsulated within an encapsulating material, the delivery system having a tensile strength of at least 6,500 psi.


In a still further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of preparing a target delivery system for an edible composition comprising combining at least one active component, at least one encapsulating material, and optionally at least one additive until a preselected tensile strength of the target delivery system is obtained based on comparison with the tensile strength of at least one sample delivery system having the same or similar active component and a known release rate of the active component.


There is also provided a method of preparing a target delivery system for an edible composition useful for delivering at least one active component at a desired release rate, said method comprising the step of encapsulating the at least one active component in an encapsulating material in a manner that provides the target delivery system with a tensile strength of at least 6,500 psi.


Still further there is provided a method of preparing a target delivery system for an edible composition useful for delivering at least one active component at a desired release rate, said method comprising encapsulating the at least one active component in an encapsulating material in a manner that provides the target delivery system with a target tensile strength associated with the desired release rate, enabling the delivery system to release the at least one active component form the edible composition at the desired release rate.


In addition, there is provided a method of preparing an edible composition containing a target delivery system useful for delivering at least one active component at a desired release rate, said method comprising encapsulating the at least one active component in an encapsulating material in a manner that provides the target delivery system with a target tensile strength associated with the desired release rate enabling the delivery system to release the at least one active component from the edible composition at desired release rate, and adding the target delivery system to the edible composition.


There is also provided edible compositions containing the present delivery system. Although the one embodiment of the present invention relates to chewing gum compositions, confectionery compositions and beverages, the present invention can be utilized to produce a variety of edible compositions including, but not limited to, food products, foodstuffs, nutrient-containing compositions, pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, vitamins and other products that may be prepared for consumption by the consumer. Because the delivery system may be readily incorporated into an edible composition, the edible compositions which may benefit from and are encompassed by the present invention are wide ranging as indicated above.


The term “delivery system” as used herein is meant to encompass the encapsulating material and a single active component encapsulated therein as well as other additives used to form the delivery system as hereinafter described. It will be understood that the edible compositions of the present invention may contain a plurality of delivery systems with each delivery system containing a single active component.


The term “encapsulating material” is meant to encompass any one or more edible water insoluble materials capable of forming a solid coating or film as a protective barrier around the active component.


The present invention is directed generally to a delivery system as defined herein for use in edible compositions, which comprises an encapsulating material and an active component encapsulated by the encapsulating material. The delivery system of the present invention is formulated with a predetermined tensile strength sufficient to provide consistent controlled release of the active component over a preselected period of time such as an extended period of time. This period of time will vary depending on the type of product in which the delivery system is incorporated. One of skill in the art, based on the disclosure herein can adjust the delivery system to achieve the desired effect. An extended period of time as used herein, relates to an increased release of the active ingredient from the delivery system for over a greater period of time than previously described systems and can be at least 15 minutes, including at least 20 minutes, at least 25 minutes, at least 30 minutes, as well as all values and ranges therebetween, for example, about 25 to 30 minutes or more. Furthermore, the delivery system of the present invention also provides a way to not only deliver active agents over a prolonged period of time but also maintain an increased intensity of the active ingredient over the extended period of time. For example, if the active ingredient is a flavor or sweetener. In one aspect of the invention, the amount of active agent released can vary during the extended period of time. For example, at an early stage of delivery the amount of active component released (based on the total amount present in the delivery system at that time) can be greater than the amount of active component released during subsequent or later periods (based on the total amount present in the delivery system at that time).


In one embodiment, the extended period of time results in retaining at least about 5% of the at least one active component after 30 minutes from the start of delivering the active component in the edible composition, such as the start of chewing a chewing gum composition, including at least about 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, or more after 30 minutes. In another embodiment, the extended period of time results in retaining at least about 10% of the at least one active component after 20 minutes from the start of delivering the active component, including at least about 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50% or more after 20 minutes. In another embodiment, the extended period of time results in retaining at least about 30% of the at least one active component after 15 minutes from the start of delivering the active component, including at least about 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 75% or more after 15 minutes.


In another embodiment, using sweetener in chewing gum as an example, the extended period of time results in a perceived sweetness intensity during at least the entire period of time noted above, e.g., at least about 15 minutes, at least about 20 minutes, at least about 30 minutes, etcetera from the start of chewing the chewing gum composition.


The predetermined tensile strength is determined based, in part, on the active component and the desired release time of the same. The predetermined tensile strength may be selected from a standard comprised of one or more delivery systems with each standard delivery system having a known release rate of the desired active component. The delivery system of the present invention further provides the active component with a protective barrier against moisture and other conditions such as pH changes, reactive compounds and the like, the presence of which can undesirably degrade the active component.


The delivery system facilitates the controlled release of the active component in a wide variety of edible compositions including chewing gum compositions, food products, confectionery compositions, pharmaceutical compositions, beverages, foodstuffs, nutrient-containing compositions, vitamins, nutraceuticals and the like.


The delivery system is developed in accordance with the present invention to have a desirable tensile strength which may be selected, depending in part on the active component and the release rate of the active component desired, from a standard of known delivery systems containing the active component at known release rates. The active components which may be incorporated as part of the delivery system may be selected from sweeteners including high intensity sweeteners, acids, flavorants, pharmaceuticals, therapeutic agents, vitamins, breath fresheners, cooling agents and other materials that would benefit by coating for protection, controlled release and/or for taste masking. The active components include nicotine useful for the treatment of addiction to tobacco products and caffeine typically found in coffee and/or cola beverages. In a particularly one form of the present invention, the active component is a sweetener, for example a high intensity sweetener such as neotame and aspartame.


It has been found in accordance with the present invention that a delivery system for delivering an active component can be formulated to ensure an effective sustained release of the active component based on the type and amount of the active component and desired release rate. For example, it may be desirable to effect the controlled release of a high intensity sweetener over a period of 25 to 30 minutes to ensure against a rapid burst of sweetness which may be offensive to some consumers. A shorter controlled release time may be desirable for other type of active components such as pharmaceuticals or therapeutic agents, which may be incorporated into the same edible composition by using separate delivery systems for each active component. In accordance with the present invention, delivery systems may be formulated with a particular tensile strength associated with a range of release rates based on a standard. The standard may comprise a series of known delivery systems having tensile strengths over a range extending, for example, from low to high tensile strength values. Each of the delivery systems of the standard will be associated with a particular release rate or ranges of release rates. Thus, for example, a delivery system can be formulated with a relatively slow release rate by a fabricating a delivering system having a relatively high tensile strength. Conversely, lower tensile strength compositions tend to exhibit relatively fast release rates. One factor of the present invention is that the tensile strength of the delivery system is directly associated with the release rate of the active component without direct regard for the type or molecular weight of the encapsulating material.


In one embodiment, the present invention includes the incorporation of a plurality of delivery systems to deliver a plurality of separate active components including active components which may be desirably released at distinctly different release rates.


For example, high intensity sweeteners may desirably be released over an extended period of time (e.g. 20 to 30 minutes) while some pharmaceuticals are desirably released over a significantly shorter period of time.


In certain embodiments of the present invention, the delivery system can be prepared such that the release of the at least one active agent is at specific rates relative to the time of delivery. For example, in one embodiment, the delivery system can be prepared such that the release of the at least one active agent is released at a rate of 80% over the course of 15 minutes, 90% over the course of 20 minutes, and/or a 95% over the course of 30 minutes. In another embodiment, the delivery system can be prepared such that the one or more active agents are released at a rate of 25% over the course of 15 minutes, 50% over the course of 20 minutes and/or 75% over the course of 30 minutes.


In a one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of selecting a target delivery system containing an active component for an edible composition. The method generally includes preparing a targeted delivery system containing an active component, an encapsulating material and optional additives, with the targeted delivery system having a pre-selected tensile strength. The tensile strength of the targeted delivery system is pre-selected to provide a desirable release rate of the active component. This selection of the tensile strength is based on the tensile strengths of sample delivery systems having the same or similar active component and known release rates of the active component. In a another embodiment of the invention, the method comprises the steps of (a) obtaining a plurality of sample delivery systems comprising an active component, at least one encapsulating material, and optional additives, wherein each of the delivery systems has a different tensile strength; (b) testing the sample delivery systems to determine the respective release rates of the active component; and (c) formulating a target delivery system containing the same active component with a tensile strength corresponding to a desired release rate of the active component based on the obtained sample delivery systems.


It will be understood that a plurality of delivery systems may be prepared in this manner each containing a different active component by utilizing a comparison with standard delivery systems containing such different active components.


The method of selecting at least one delivery system suitable for incorporation into an edible composition can begin by determining a desired release rate for an active component (i.e. a first active component). The determination of the desired release rate may be from known literature or technical references or by in vitro or in vivo testing. Once the desired release rate is determined, it is typical to determine the desired tensile strength (i.e. first tensile strength) for a delivery system (i.e. first delivery system) that can release the first active component at the desired release. Once the delivery system is obtained which can deliver the active component as required it is then selected for eventual inclusion in an edible composition.


The method described above may then be repeated for a second active component and for additional active components as described via the determination and selection of a suitable delivery system.


The present method can be used in connection with formulating the target delivery system using encapsulating materials having similar physical and chemical properties including the degree of water solubility, affinity for the active component, and the like as those used in the sample delivery systems.


Applicants have discovered that by maintaining the tensile strength of the delivery system within a preselected desirable range, the active component is released from the composition in a highly controlled and consistent manner irrespective of the particular type of encapsulating materials employed. By focusing on the tensile strength of the delivery system, the process for selecting and formulating suitable delivery systems is enhanced in a manner which effectively reduces the need for trial and error experimentation typically necessary in prior art systems. The present invention, for example, enables the formulation of a suitable target delivery system by focusing on a single variable (i.e., tensile strength) and therefore takes into account all components of the delivery system including encapsulating materials and any additives (e.g., fats and oils) that may be desirably added to the formulation and enables the delivery system when added to an edible composition to release the active component at a desirable release rate.


The desired tensile strength of the delivery system can be readily determined within a desired range. In one embodiment of the present invention, the tensile strength of the delivery system is at least 6,500 psi, including 7500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 125,000, 135,000, 150,000, 165,000, 175,000, 180,000, 195,000, 200,000 and all ranges and subranges there between, for example a tensile strength range of 6,500 to 200,000 psi. The formulation of a delivery system with a desirable tensile strength can be made from a variety of encapsulating materials and at least one additive which hereinafter are referred to as “at least one tensile strength modifying agent or modifier.” The at least one additive may be used to formulate the delivery system by modifying the tensile strength of the delivery system, including tensile strength-lowering materials such as fats, emulsifiers, plasticizers (softeners), waxes, low molecular weight polymers, and the like, in addition to tensile strength increasing materials such as high molecular weight polymers. In addition, the tensile strength of the delivery system can also be fine tuned by combining different tensile strength modifiers to form the delivery system. For example, the tensile strength of high molecular weight polymers such as polyvinyl acetate may be reduced when tensile strength lowering agents such as fats and/or oils are added.


In one embodiment of the present invention, at least one tensile strength modifying agent is present in the delivery system in an amount sufficient such that the release of the one or more active agents contained in the delivery system is released at a rate of 80% over the course of 15 minutes, 90% over the course of 20 minutes, and/or a 95% over the course of 30 minutes. In another embodiment, the at least one tensile strength modifying agent is present in the delivery system in an amount sufficient such that the one or more active agents are released at a rate of 25% over the course of 15 minutes, 50% over the course of 20 minutes and/or 75% over the course of 30 minutes.


In another embodiment of the present invention, the at least one tensile strength modifying agent is present in the delivery system in an amount sufficient such that the tensile strength of the delivery system is at least about 6,500 psi, including 7500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 125,000, 135,000, 150,000, 165,000, 175,000, 180,000, 195,000, 200,000 and all ranges and subranges there between, for example a tensile strength range of 6,500 to 200,000 psi.


Examples of tensile strength modifiers or modifying agents include, but are not limited to, fats (e.g., hydrogenated or non-hydrogenated vegetable oils, animal fats), waxes (e.g., microcrystalline wax, bees wax), plasticizers/emulsifiers (e.g., mineral oil, fatty acids, mono- and diglycerides, triacetin, glycerin, acetylated monoglycerides, glycerol rosin monostearate esters), low and high molecular weight polymers (e.g., polypropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol, polyisobutylene, polyethylene, polyvinylacetate) and the like, and combinations thereof. Plasticizers may also be referred to as softeners.


Thus, by employing tensile strength modifiers, the overall tensile strength of the delivery system can be adjusted or altered in such a way that a preselected tensile strength is obtained for the corresponding desired release rate of the active component from an edible composition based on a comparison with a standard.


The delivery system of the present invention is typically in the form of a powder or granules. The particle size, generally, can vary and not have a significant effect on the function of the present invention. In one embodiment the average particle size is desirably selected according to the desired rate of release and/or mouthfeel (i.e., grittiness) and the type of carrier incorporated in the edible composition. Thus, in certain embodiments of the present invention, the average particle size is from about 75 to about 600, including 100, 110, 140, 170, 200, 230, 260, 290, 320, 350, 370 and all values and ranges there between. As the values are an average one will appreciate within a given sample of powder or granules, there may be particles with sizes greater and/or less than the numerical values provided. In one embodiment of the invention, where the delivery system is incorporated into a chewing gum the particle size can be less than 600 microns.


Except as otherwise noted, the amount of the ingredients incorporated into the compositions according to the present invention is designated as % by weight based on the total weight of the composition.


The delivery systems of the present invention produce controlled release of the active components as desired through the use of a preselected tensile strength when matched with a desirable release rate selected according to the type of the active components to be encapsulated, the encapsulating material used, the additives incorporated, the desired rate of release of the active component, and the like. The materials used to encapsulate the active component are generally selected from edible water insoluble materials capable of forming a strong matrix, solid coating or film as a protective barrier around the active component. The encapsulating material is chosen in a manner consistent with the tensile strength of the delivery system which can be at least 6,500 psi, including 7500, 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000, 60,000, 70,000, 80,000, 90,000, 100,000, 125,000, 135,000, 150,000, 165,000, 175,000, 180,000, 195,000, 200,000 and all ranges and subranges there between, for example a tensile strength range of 6,500 to 200,000 psi. Such encapsulating materials may be selected from polyvinyl acetate, polyethylene, crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polymethylmethacrylate, polylactidacid, polyhydroxyalkanoates, ethylcellulose, polyvinyl acetatephthalate, polyethylene glycol esters, methacrylicacid-co-methylmethacrylate, and the like, and combinations thereof.


The encapsulating material may be present in amounts of from about 0.2% to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the edible composition, including 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, 1.0, 1.25, 1.4, 1.7, 1.9, 2.2, 2.45, 2.75, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.25, 4.8, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.25, 7.75, 8.0, 8.3, 8.7, 9.0, 9.25, 9.5, 9.8 and all values and ranges there between, for example, from 1% to 5% by weight. The amount of the encapsulating material will, of course, depend in part on the amount of the active component which must be encapsulated. The amount of the encapsulating material with respect to the weight of the delivery system, is from about 30% to 99%, including 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 95, 97 and all values and ranges there between, for example, from about 60% to 90% by weight.


The tensile strength of the delivery system may be selected from relatively high tensile strengths when a relatively slow rate of release is desired and relatively lower tensile strengths when a faster rate of release is desired. Thus, when employing a tensile strength of 50,000 for a delivery system, the release rate of the active component, will generally be lower than the release rate of the active component in a delivery system having a tensile strength of 10,000 psi regardless of the type of encapsulating material (e.g. polyvinyl acetate) chosen.


In a one embodiment of the present invention, the encapsulating material is polyvinyl acetate. A representative example of a polyvinyl acetate product suitable for use as an encapsulating material in the present invention is Vinnapas® B100 sold by Wacker Polymer Systems of Adrian, Mich. A delivery system utilizing polyvinyl acetate may be prepared by melting a sufficient amount of polyvinyl acetate at a temperature of about 65° to 120° C. for a short period of time, e.g., 5 minutes. The melt temperature will depend on the type and tensile strength of the polyvinyl acetate encapsulating material where higher tensile strength materials will generally melt at higher temperatures. Once the encapsulating material is melted, a suitable amount of the active component (e.g., high intensity sweetener such as aspartame) is added and blended into the molten mass thoroughly for an additional short period of mixing. The resulting mixture is a semi-solid mass, which is then cooled (e.g., at 0° C.) to obtain a solid, and then ground to a U.S. Standard sieve size of from about 30 to 200 (600 to 75 microns). The tensile strength of the resulting delivery system can readily be tested according to ASTM-D638.


The selection of a suitable encapsulating material will also depend in part on the type and amount of the active component and the presence of other additives or ingredients. Plasticizers or softeners as well as fats and oils, for example, act as “tensile strength modifying agents” and may be incorporated into the delivery system and particularly into the encapsulating material to modify the tensile strength of the resulting delivery system. The above mentioned additives may be added to the encapsulating material during the molten state. The amount of additives used in the delivery system of the present invention will of course vary according to the desired tensile strength but will typically range up to 40% by weight based on the total weight of the delivery system.


In formulating the delivery system to have a predetermined tensile strength, the active component can be entirely encapsulated within the encapsulating material or incompletely encapsulated within the encapsulating provided the resulting tensile strength of the delivery system meets the criteria set forth hereinabove. The incomplete encapsulation can be accomplished by modifying and/or adjusting the manufacturing process to get partial coverage of the active component.


The presence of fats and oils as an additive has been found to have two effects on the delivery system. The first effect is observed at lower concentrations, i.e. up to 5% by weight, including up to 4.7, up to 4.5, up to 4.25, up to 4.0, up to 3.5, up to 3.0, up to 2.5, up to 2.25, up to 2.0, up to 1.75, up to 1.5, up to 1.0 and all values and ranges therebetween, wherein the fats and/or oils either maintain or increase the tensile strength of the delivery system. At higher concentrations (i.e., typically above 5% by weight), the fats and/or oils tend to reduce the tensile strength of the delivery system. Even with such unusual or non-linear effects on the tensile strength of the delivery system, a suitable delivery system with the desired release of the active component may be readily formulated in accordance with the present invention because the targeted delivery system is prepared based on sample delivery systems having known release rates for the active component.


Although the present description made herein relates to sweeteners, it will be understood that the effect of tensile strength on the delivery system will be similar regardless of the active component.


The sweetening agents used may be selected from a wide range of materials including water-soluble sweeteners, water-soluble artificial sweeteners, water-soluble sweeteners derived from naturally occurring water-soluble sweeteners, dipeptide based sweeteners, and protein based sweeteners, including mixtures thereof. Without being limited to particular sweeteners, representative categories and examples include:

    • (a) water-soluble sweetening agents such as dihydrochalcones, monellin, steviosides, glycyrrhizin, dihydroflavenol, and sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, and L-aminodicarboxylic acid aminoalkenoic acid ester amides, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,619,834, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, and mixtures thereof;
    • (b) water-soluble artificial sweeteners such as soluble saccharin salts, i.e., sodium or calcium saccharin salts, cyclamate salts, acesulfame salts, such as the sodium, ammonium or calcium salt of 3,4-dihydro-6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazine-4-one-2,2-dioxide, the potassium salt of 3,4-dihydro-6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazine-4-one-2,2-dioxide (Acesulfame-K), the free acid form of saccharin, and mixtures thereof;
    • (c) dipeptide based sweeteners, such as L-aspartic acid derived sweeteners, such as L-aspartyl-L-phenylalanine methyl ester (Aspartame) and materials described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,492,131, L-alphaaspartyl-N-(2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-3-thietanyl)-D-alaninamide hydrate (Alitame), methyl esters of L-aspartyl-L-phenylglycerine and L-aspartyl-L-2,5-dihydrophenyl-glycine, L-aspartyl-2,5-dihydro-L-phenylalanine; L-aspartyl-L-(1-cyclohexen)-alanine, neotame, and mixtures thereof;
    • (d) water-soluble sweeteners derived from naturally occurring water-soluble sweeteners, such as stevosides, chlorinated derivatives of ordinary sugar (sucrose), e.g., chlorodeoxysugar derivatives such as derivatives of chlorodeoxysucrose or chlorodeoxygalactosucrose, known, for example, under the product designation of Sucralose; examples of chlorodeoxysucrose and chlorodeoxygalactosucrose derivatives include but are not limited to: 1-chloro-1′-deoxysucrose; 4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-alpha-D-fructofuranoside, or 4-chloro-4-deoxygalactosucrose; 4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-1-chloro-1-deoxy-beta-D-fructo-furanoside, or 4,1′-dichloro-4,1′-dideoxygalactosucrose; 1′,6′-dichloro1′,6′-dideoxysucrose; 4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideoxy-beta-D-fructofuranoside, or 4,1′,6′-trichloro-4,1′,6′-trideoxygalactosucrose; 4,6-dichloro-4,6-dideoxy-alpha-D-galactopyranosyl-6-chloro-6-deoxy-beta-D-fructofuranoside, or 4,6,6′-trichloro-4,6,6′-trideoxygalactosucrose; 6,1′,6′-trichloro-6,1′,6′-trideoxysucrose; 4,6-dichloro-4,6-dideoxy-alpha-D-galacto-pyranosyl-1,6-dichloro-1,6-dideox y-beta-D-fructofuranoside, or 4,6,1′,6′-tetrachloro4,6,1′,6′-tetradeoxygalacto-sucrose; and 4,6,1′,6′-tetradeoxy-sucrose, and mixtures thereof; and
    • (e) protein based sweeteners such as thaumaoccous danielli (Thaumatin I and II), talin.


The intense sweetening agents may be used in many distinct physical forms well-known in the art to provide an initial burst of sweetness and/or a prolonged sensation of sweetness. Without being limited thereto, such physical forms include free forms, such as spray dried, powdered, beaded forms, encapsulated forms, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the sweetener is a high intensity sweetener such as aspartame, sucralose, and acesulfame potassium (Ace-K).


The active component (e.g., sweetener), which is part of the delivery system, may be used in amounts necessary to impart the desired effect associated with use of the active component (e.g., sweetness). With respect to their presence in the delivery system, the active components may be present in amounts of from about 1% to 70% by weight based on the total weight of the delivery system, including 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65% by weight, and all values and ranges there between, for example, from about 10% to 40% by weight based on the total weight of the delivery system. For typical edible compositions including chewing gum compositions, confectionery compositions and beverage compositions, the sweeteners may be present in amounts of from about 0.1% to 6% by weight based on the total weight of the edible composition, including 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5% by weight and all values and subranges there between, for example, 0.5% to 3% by weight. The active component especially when the active component is a sweetener may also be present in the edible composition in free form depending on the release profile desired.


In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided edible compositions which comprise the present delivery system and a carrier in an amount appropriate to accommodate the delivery system. The term “carrier” as used herein refers to an orally acceptable vehicle such as the soluble and insoluble components of a chewing gum composition capable of being mixed with the delivery system, and which will not cause harm to warm-blooded animals including humans. The carriers further include those components of the composition that are capable of being commingled without significant interaction with the delivery system.


In a one embodiment of the present invention, the edible composition is a chewing gum composition having prolonged release (e.g., typically at least 15 minutes) of the active component. The chewing gum composition comprises a chewing gum base and the delivery system of the present invention that comprises an encapsulating material and at least one encapsulated active component such as, for example, a sweetener or a flavorant. The delivery system is present in amounts from about 0.2% to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the chewing gum composition, including 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0% by weight including all values and subranges there between, for example, from about 1% to 5% by weight.


The present invention may be incorporated with a variety of processes for preparing chewing gum compositions as known in the art. Such chewing gum compositions may be and include a variety of different formulations that are typically used to make chewing gum products. Typically, a chewing gum composition contains a chewable gum base portion, which is essentially free of water and is water insoluble and a water soluble bulk portion.


The water soluble portion is generally released from the gum base portion over a period of time during chewing. The gum base portion is retained in the mouth throughout the chewing. The water insoluble gum base generally comprises elastomers, elastomer solvents, plasticizers, waxes, emulsifiers, and inorganic fillers. Plastic polymers such as polyvinyl acetate, which behave somewhat as plasticizers, are also included. Other plastic polymers that may be used include polyvinyl laurate, crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone and polyhydroxy alkanoates.


The elastomers may constitute from about 5% to 95% by weight of the gum base. In another embodiment, the elastomers may constitute from about 10% to 70% by weight of the gum base and in another embodiment, 15% to 45% by weight of the gum base. Examples of elastomers include synthetic elastomers such as polyisobutylene, polybutylene, isobutylene-isoprene co-polymers, styrene-butadiene co-polymers, polyvinyl acetate and the like. Elastomers may also include natural elastomers such as natural rubber as well as natural gums such as jelutong, lechi caspi, perillo, massaranduba balata, chicle, gutta hang kang or combinations thereof. Other elastomers are known to those of ordinary skill in the art.


Elastomer plasticizers modify the finished gum firmness when used in the gum base. Elastomer plasticizers are typically present in an amount up to 75% by weight of the gum base. In another embodiment, the elastomer plasticizers are present in an amount of from about 5% to 45% by weight of the gum base and in another embodiment from about 10% to 30% by weight of gum base. Examples of elastomer plasticizers include natural rosin esters such as glycerol ester of partially hydrogenated rosin, glycerol ester of tall oil rosin, pentaerythritol esters of partially hydrogenated rosin, methyl and partially hydrogenated methyl esters of rosin, and the like. Synthetic elastomer plasticizers such as terpene resins may also be employed in gum base composition.


Waxes include synthetic and naturally occurring waxes such as polyethylene, bees wax, carnauba and the like. Petroleum waxes such a paraffin may also be used. The waxes may be present in the amount up to 30% by weight of the gum base. Waxes aid in the curing of the finished gum and help improve the release of flavor and may further extend the shelf life of the product.


Elastomer solvents are often resins such as terpene resins. Plasticizers, sometimes referred to as softeners, are typically fats and oils, including tallow, hydrogenated vegetable oils, and cocoa butter.


Gum base typically also includes a filler component. The filler component modifies the texture of the gum base and aid processing. Examples of such fillers include magnesium and aluminum silicates, clay, alumina, talc, titanium oxide, cellulose polymers, and the like. Fillers are typically present in the amount of from 1% to 60% by weight.


Emulsifiers, which sometimes also have plasticizing properties, include glycerol monostearate, lecithin, and glycerol triacetate. Further, gum bases may also contain optional ingredients such as antioxidants, colors, and flavors.


The insoluble gum base may be present in the amount of from about 5% to 95% by weight of the chewing gum. In one embodiment, the insoluble gum base may present in the amount of from about 10% to 50% by weight of the gum base, and in another embodiment from about 20% to 40% by weight of the gum base.


Softeners are added to the chewing gum in order to optimize the chewability and mouth feel of the gum. Softeners, also known in the art as plasticizers or plasticizing agents, is generally present in amounts from about 0.5% to 15% by weight based on the total weight of the chewing gum composition. Softeners contemplated by the present invention include, for example, lecithin. Further, aqueous sweetener solutions such as those containing sorbitol, hydrogenated starch hydrolysate, corn syrup, and combinations thereof may be used as softeners and binding agents in the gum.


The chewing gum compositions of the present invention may be coated or uncoated and be in the form or slabs, sticks, pellets, balls and the like. The composition of the different forms of the chewing gum compositions will be similar but may vary with regard to the ratio of the ingredients. For example, coated gum compositions may contain a lower percentage of softeners. Pellets and balls have a small chewing gum core, which is then coated with either a sugar solution or a sugarless solution to create a hard shell. Slabs and sticks are usually formulated to be softer in texture than the chewing gum core.


In accordance with one aspect of the chewing gum composition of the present invention, the delivery system is added during the manufacture of the chewing gum composition. In another aspect of the present invention, the delivery system is added as one of the last steps, for example, the last step in the formation of the chewing gum composition. Applicants have determined that this process modification incorporates the delivery system into the gum composition without materially binding the delivery system therein such as may occur if the delivery system is mixed directly with the gum base. Thus, the delivery system, while only loosely contained within the gum composition can more effectively release the active component therefrom during a typical chewing operation. Thus, a material portion of the delivery system is free of the gum base and the corresponding ingredients of the chewing gum.


Coating techniques for applying a coating for a chewing gum composition such as pan and spray coating are well known. In one embodiment, coating with solutions adapted to build a hard candy layer can be employed. Both sugar and sugar alcohols may be used for this purpose together with high intensity sweeteners, colorants, flavorants and binders.


Other components may be added in minor amounts to the coating syrup and include moisture absorbing compounds, anti-adherent compounds, dispersing agents and film forming agents. The moisture absorbing compounds suitable for use in the coating syrups include mannitol or dicalcium phosphate. Examples of useful anti-adherent compounds, which may also function as a filler, include talc, magnesium trisilicate and calcium carbonate. These ingredients may be employed in amounts of from about 0.5% to 5% by weight of the syrup. Examples of dispersing agents, which may be employed in the coating syrup, include titanium dioxide, talc or other anti-adherent compounds as set forth above.


The coating syrup is usually heated and a portion thereof deposited on the cores. Usually a single deposition of the coating syrup is not sufficient to provide the desired amount or thickness of coating and second, third or more coats of the coating syrup may be applied to build up the weight and thickness of the coating to desired levels with layers allowed to dry in-between coats.


A method of preparing the chewing gum composition of the present invention is provided by sequentially adding the various chewing gum ingredients including the delivery system of the present invention to any commercially available mixer known in the art. After the ingredients have been thoroughly mixed, the gum base is discharged from the mixer and shaped into the desired form such as by rolling into sheets and cutting into sticks, extruding into chunks, or casing into pellets.


Generally, the ingredients are mixed by first melting the gum base and adding it to the running mixer. The base may also be melted into the mixer itself. Colors or emulsifiers may also be added at this time. A softener may be added to the mixer at this time, along with syrup and a portion of the bulking agent. Further parts of the bulking agent are then added to the mixer. Flavorants are typically added with the final portion of the bulking agent. Finally, the delivery system exhibiting a predetermeined tensile strength is added to the resulting mixture. Other optional ingredients are added in the batch in a typical fashion, well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.


The entire mixing procedure typically takes from five to fifteen minutes, but longer mixing times may be required. Those skilled in the art will recognize that many variations of the above-described procedure may be follows.


After the ingredients are mixed, the gum mass may be formed into a variety of shapes and products. For example, the ingredients may be formed into pellets or balls and used as cores to make a coated chewing gum product. However, any type of chewing gum product can be utilized with the present invention.


If a coated product is desired, the coating may contain ingredients such as flavorants, artificial sweeteners, dispersing agents, coloring agents, film formers and binding agents. Flavorants contemplated by the present invention, include those commonly known in the art such as essential oils, synthetic flavors, or mixtures thereof, including but are not limited to, oils derived from plants and fruits such as citrus oils, fruit essences, peppermint oil, spearmint oil, other mint oils, clove oil, oil of wintergreen, anise and the like. The flavorants may also be added to the coating syrup in an amount such that the coating may be present in amounts of from about 0.2% to 1.2% by weight flavoring agent. In another embodiment, the coating may be present in amounts, and more preferably from about 0.7% to 1.0% by weight flavoring agent.


Dispersing agents are often added to syrup coatings for the purpose of whitening and tack reduction. Dispersing agents contemplated by the present invention to be employed in the coating syrup include titanium dioxide, talc, or any other anti-stick compound. The dispersing agent may be added to the coating syrup in an amount such that the coating contains from about 0.1% to 1.0%, including 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and all values and ranges there between, for example, from about 0.3% to 0.6% by weight of the agent.


Coloring agents may be added directly to the coating syrup in dye or lake form. Coloring agents contemplated by the present invention include food quality dyes. Film formers may be added to the coating syrup include methylcellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, and the like or combinations thereof. Binding agents may be added either as an initial coating on the chewing gum center or may be added directly to the coating syrup. Binding agents contemplated by the present invention include gum arabic, gum talha, gelatin, vegetable gums, and the like. The binding agents, when added to the coating syrup, are typically added in amounts from about 0.5% to 10% by weight.


The present invention further encompasses confectionery compositions containing the delivery system of the present invention. Confectionery compositions include, for example, compressed tablets such as mints, hard boiled candies, chocolates, chocolate containing products, nutrient bars, nougats, gels, centerfill confections, fondants, panning goods, consumable thin films and other compositions falling within the generally accepted definition of confectionery compositions.


Confectionery compositions in the form of pressed tablets such as mints may generally be made by combining finely sifted sugar or sugar substitute, flavoring agent (e.g. peppermint flavor) bulking agent such as gum arabic, and an optional coloring agent. The flavoring agent, bulking agent are combined and then gradually the sugar or sugar substitute are added along with a coloring agent if needed.


The product is then granulated by passing through a seize of desired mesh size (e.g. 12 mesh) and then dried typically at temperatures of from about 55° C. to 60° C. The resulting powder is fed into a tableting machine fitted with a large size punch and the resulting pellets are broken into granules and then pressed.


High boiled candies typically contain sugar or sugar substitute, glucose, water, flavoring agent and optional coloring agent. The sugar is dissolved in the water and glucose is then added. The mixture is brought to a boil. The resulting liquid to which may previously have been added a coloring agent is poured onto an oiled slab and cooled. The flavoring agent are then added and kneaded into the cooled mass. The resulting mixture is then fed to a drop roller assembly known in the art to form the final hard candy shape.


A nougat composition typically includes two principal components, a high boiled candy and a frappe. By way of example, egg albumen or substitute thereof is combined with water and whisked to form a light foam. Sugar and glucose are added to water and boiled typically at temperatures of from about 130° C. to 140° C. and the resulting boiled product is poured into a mixing machine and beat until creamy.


The beaten albumen and flavoring agent are combined with the creamy product and the combination is thereafter thoroughly mixed.


Further details regarding the preparation of confectionery compositions can be found in Skuse's Complete Confectioner (13th Edition) (1957) including pp. 41-71, 133-144, and 255-262; and Sugar Confectionery Manufacture (2nd Edition) (1995), E. B. Jackson, Editor, pp. 129-168, 169-188, 189-216, 218-234, and 236-258 each of which is incorporated herein by reference.


EXAMPLE 1

The following study shows the effect of the presence of oil or fats on the overall tensile strength of one embodiment of the delivery system of the present invention. The rate of release of the active component (i.e., aspartame) is affected by the variation in tensile strength such that the release rate of the higher tensile strength delivery system is generally slower than the release rate of lower tensile strength formulations. When relatively large amounts of oil or fat are used, the tensile strength of the delivery system is generally lowered which increases the release rate of the active component. Conversely, reduced amounts of fats or oils are employed typically for higher tensile strength delivery systems exhibiting lower release rates.


Experimental Procedure

Preparation of the Delivery Systems


Four delivery systems for delivering a high intensity sweetener (i.e., aspartame) containing varying amounts of polyvinyl acetate, and oils or fat were prepared in accordance with the formulations shown in Table 1.













TABLE 1






Delivery
Delivery
Delivery
Delivery



System 1
System 2
System 3
System 4


Ingredient
(20% Fat)
(10% Fat)
(0% Fat)
(5% Fat)



















Polyvinyl acetate B100
50%
 60%
70%
65


Hydrogenated Oil
15%
7.5%
 0%
3.5


Glycerol Monostearate
 5%
2.5%
 0%
1.5


Aspartame
30%
 30%
30%
30%


Tensile Strength (psi)
10,829
24,833
22,761
42,900









Polyvinyl acetate was melted at a temperature of about 110° C. in a continuous extruder. The hydrogenated oil and glycerol monostearate (fat) were added to the molten polyvinyl acetate. Aspartame was then added to the resulting mixture and mixed under high shear to completely disperse the ingredients. The resulting extrudate was cooled and then sized to a particle size of less than 420 microns to produce the corresponding delivery system containing the encapsulated high intensity sweetener aspartame as the active component. The tensile strength of each of the final delivery systems was measured in accordance with ASTM Standard D638-02a and is shown in Table 1.


As indicated in Table 1, the addition of fats and oils exhibits two effects on the tensile strength of the delivery system when a portion of the encapsulating material (polyvinyl acetate) is replaced by the fats and oils. As shown by a comparison of delivery system no. 3 to delivery system no. 4, there is a sharp increase in tensile strength when 5% by weight of polyvinyl acetate is replaced by a corresponding amounts of fats and oils. When the replacement is 10% by weight the tensile strength drops significantly but remains above the level of the fat and oil free delivery system (delivery system no. 1). When fats and oils are used in relatively large amounts (i.e., 20% by weight), the delivery system tends to exhibit a much lower tensile strength as compared to delivery system no. 3.


Preparation of the Chewing Gums


Three sample chewing gum compositions were prepared using the ingredients listed in Table 2 and incorporating delivery system nos. 1 through 3 as shown in Table 1.














TABLE 2








Chewing
Chewing
Chewing



Ingredient
Gum 1
Gum 2
Gum 3





















Gum base
39.0
39.0
39.0



Sorbitol
42.8
42.8
42.8



Mannitol
9.0
9.0
9.0



Flavor
4.67
4.67
4.67



Glycerin
1.5
1.5
1.5



Lecithin
0.2
0.2
0.2



Delivery System 1
2.83





Delivery System 2

2.83




Delivery System 3


2.83










The chewing gum composition was prepared as follows. The gum base was melted at a suitable temperature in a mixer. The remaining ingredients were then added to the melted gum base and mixed until the ingredients were completely dispersed. The resulting chewing gum composition was sized and conditioned for about 1 week and evaluated using a pool of human subjects. Each of the human subjects were asked to sample the chewing gum compositions by chewing each of the samples listed in Table 2 and rating the sweetness intensity of each sample at 10 minute intervals over a 30 minute time period. The resulting data is shown in FIG. 1.


Results


As shown in FIG. 1, Gum 3 prepared with fat and oil free delivery system no. 3 provided extended sweetener release with higher sweetener intensity measured at each of the intervals as compared to Gums 1 and 2 each of which contained a delivery system with some level of oil and fat. Gum 1 prepared from delivery system no. 1, which exhibited the lowest tensile strength due in part to its higher oil and fat content, had a relatively short duration of sweetener release and exhibited the lowest sweetener intensity subsequent to the initial release as measured at each of the 10 minute intervals.


It will be understood that each of the chewing gum compositions prepared in accordance with Example 1 could readily be modified to include one or more additional delivery systems each containing a different active component.


EXAMPLE 2

The following study examined the relationship between tensile strength of the delivery system and the release rate of the encapsulated active component. The presence of fats or oils were varied to modify the tensile strength of the delivery system, thereby allowing the release rate of the encapsulated active component to be adjusted as desired.


Experimental Procedure

Preparation of the Delivery Systems


Four delivery systems were prepared using the ingredients listed in Table 3.













TABLE 3






Delivery
Delivery
Delivery
Delivery


Ingredient
System 5
System 4
System 6
System 7







Polyvinyl acetate (High

 65%

 65%


Tensile Strength)


Polyvinyl acetate (Low
63%

63%


Tensile Strength)


Hydrogenated Oil
15%
3.5%
15%
3.5%


Glycerol Monostearate
 5%
1.5%
 5%
1.5%


Aspartame
17%
 30%


Acesulfame-K


17%
 30%


Tensile Strength (psi)
6,500
42,900
*
**





*not measured but believed to be similar to delivery system no. 5


**not measured but believed to be similar to delivery system no. 4






The above delivery systems (i.e., delivery system nos. 4 to 7) were prepared in the following manner. The polyvinyl acetate encapsulating materials were melted at a temperature of about 110° C. in a continuous extruder. Hydrogenated oil and glycerol monostearate were added to the molten encapsulating materials. The sweetener was then added to the resulting mixture. The mixture was thoroughly mixed under high shear to completely disperse the ingredients to yield an extrudate. The mixed extrudate was thereafter allowed to cool and comminuted to yield particles of the respective delivery systems having a particle size of about less than 600 microns. The delivery systems were each formulated to exhibit a specific tensile strength, in part based on the amount and strength of the polyvinyl acetate and the amount of the fats and oils and other components. The tensile strength of each of delivery system nos. 4 through 7 is listed in Table 3.


Preparation of Chewing Gum Samples


Two test samples of chewing gum compositions referred to herein as Gums 4 and 5 were prepared and formulated with the ingredients listed in Table 4 below. Gum 4 was formulated with a combination of delivery system nos. 5 and 6 shown in Table 3 in the specified amounts to yield a chewing gum having a relatively low tensile strength delivery system. Gum 5 was formulated with a combination of delivery system nos. 4 and 7 in the specified amounts to yield a chewing gum having a relatively high tensile strength delivery system.













TABLE 4







Ingredient
Chewing Gum 4
Chewing Gum 5









Gum base
39.0%
39.0%



Sorbitol
42.5%
44.3%



Mannitol
 9.0%
 9.0%



Flavor
3.67%
3.67%



Glycerin
 1.5%
 1.5%



Lecithin
 0.2%
 0.2%



Delivery System 5
2.94%




Delivery System 6
1.26%




Delivery System 4

1.63%



Delivery System 7

 0.7%










The above test sample chewing gums were each prepared in the following manner. The gum base was melted in a mixer. The remaining ingredients were added to the melted gum base. The melted gum base was mixed to completely disperse the ingredients. The resulting chewing gum was allowed to cool. The cooled chewing gum was sized and conditioned for about a week.


It will be understood that each of the chewing gum compositions prepared in accordance with Example 2 could readily be modified to include one or more additional delivery systems each containing a different active component.


Descriptive Panel Evaluation

Sweetness and Bitterness Intensity Analysis


A pool of human subjects was assembled to taste and rate the sweetness intensity of the chewing gum test samples over time. Each of the human subjects were asked to sample by chewing the test sample gums 4 and 5 over a 30 minute period. At each 5-minute interval, the human subjects were asked to rate the perceived sweetness intensity of the chewing gum sampled on a scale of 1 to 10. The results are shown in FIG. 2.


Further to measuring sweetness intensity as perceived by the humans subjects during the chewing, the human subjects were also asked to rate the perceived bitterness intensity of the chewing on a similar scale of 1 to 10. The results are shown in FIG. 4.


Residual Sweetener Analysis


The chewing gums chewed by the human subjects were also subjected to chemical analysis at 5-minute intervals to measure the amount of the residual sweetener remaining in the gum bolus. Every 5 minutes over the 30-minute period, the bolus of the chewing gum was retrieved from each of the human subjects and tested by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results are shown in FIG. 3.


Results


Descriptive Panel Results


As shown in FIG. 2, the perceived sweetness intensity of Gum 4 having the lower tensile strength delivery system decreased significantly more rapidly than Gum 5 having the higher tensile strength delivery system over the 30 minute period. From the data presented in FIG. 2, high tensile strength delivery systems tends to extend the duration of sweetener release from the chewing gum.


As shown in FIG. 4, the results indicate that Gum 5 possessing the higher tensile strength delivery system exhibited an initial perceived bitterness intensity that was relatively higher than Gum 4 (i.e., lower tensile strength delivery system). However, over the course of the next 20 minutes, the perceived bitterness in Gum 5 (higher tensile strength) decreased over time, while the perceived bitterness (lower tensile strength) increased over time and remained above the bitter intensity of Gum 5. The results show that the release rate of the sweetener affects the perception of the inherent bitter flavor that may be normally present in chewing gum compositions. The slower release rate of the sweetener in Gum 5 (higher tensile strength) extended the duration of the taste masking over the course of the 25 minutes, thus reducing the perception of bitter taste as compared to Gum 4 (lower tensile strength).


Human Chew-out/Residual Aspartame


As shown in FIG. 3, Gum 4 having a delivery system with a relatively lower tensile strength exhibited a higher rate of sweetener release than Gum 5 having a delivery system with a relatively higher tensile strength over the 30 minute period. Accordingly, by increasing the tensile strength of the delivery system, a lower rate of release of the sweetener can thereby be achieved. Conversely, reducing the tensile strength of the delivery system increases the rate of release of the sweetener. Chewing Gum 4 with the relatively lower tensile strength delivery system further showed a lower residual amount aspartame in the chewed cuds as compared to Gum 5 with the relatively higher tensile strength delivery system. Thus, the data shows that higher tensile strength delivery systems generally provide a slower rate of release of the sweeteners. The results shown in FIG. 3 are consistent with the results shown in FIG. 2 in that faster release of the sweetener results in less sweetener retained in the gum over time.


The forgoing discussion discloses and describes merely exemplary embodiments of the present invention. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from such discussion, and from the accompanying claims, that various changes, modifications, and variations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of selecting a delivery system suitable for incorporation into a chewing gum composition, said method comprising: determining a desired release rate for an encapsulated active component in the chewing gum composition from the start of chewing the chewing gum composition;determining a desired tensile strength for a delivery system associated with said desired release rate for said active component;selecting a delivery system for the active component based, at least in part, on said tensile strength of the delivery system and, in part, based on an amount of at least one tensile strength modifying agent in said delivery system; andmixing the delivery system with a gum base to yield a chewing gum composition;wherein the delivery system comprising a mixture of an active component, an encapsulation material, and at least one tensile strength modifying agent;wherein the active component is encapsulated within the encapsulation material;wherein the encapsulation material is selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl acetate, polyethylene, crosslinked polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polymethylmethacrylate, polylactic acid, polyhydroxyalkanoates, ethylcellulose, polyvinyl acetate phthalate, polyethylene glycol esters, methacrylicacid-co-methylmethacrylate and combinations thereof; andwherein the at least one tensile strength modifying agent comprises at least one hydrogenated vegetable oil; and wherein the amount of fats and oils in each delivery system is from 1% to 5% by weight of the delivery system.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: determining a second desired release rate for a second active component in the chewing gum composition;determining a second desired tensile strength for a second delivery system associated with said second desired release rate from the start of chewing the chewing gum composition;andselecting a second delivery system for said second active component based, at least in part, on said second tensile strength.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 further comprising repeating determining a desired release rate, determining a desired tensile strength and selecting a delivery system for at least one additional active component of the chewing gum composition.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the tensile strength is at least 6,500 psi.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein determining the desired tensile strength comprises: associating a different tensile strength for each of a plurality of release rates of said at least one active component.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining the desired tensile strength comprises: associating a different tensile strength for each of a plurality of release rates for each of the plurality of active components.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, further comprising: determining a desired tensile strength for each of a plurality of delivery systems.
  • 8. The method of claim 3, wherein the tensile strength is at least 10,000 psi.
  • 9. The method of claim 3, wherein the tensile strength is at least 22,000 psi.
  • 10. The method of claim 3, wherein the tensile strength is at least 24,000 psi.
  • 11. The method of claim 3, wherein the tensile strength is at least 42,000 psi.
  • 12. The method of claim 3, wherein the active component is selected from the group consisting of a sweetener, an acid, a flavorant, a pharmaceutical, a therapeutic agent, a vitamin, a breath freshener, a cooling agent and combinations thereof.
  • 13. The method of claim 3, wherein the active component is a high intensity sweetener.
  • 14. The method of claim 3, wherein the active component is a sweetener and is selected from the group consisting of a dipeptide sweetener, glycyrrhizin, saccharin, a saccharin salt, an acesulfame salt, a cyclamate, a stevioside, talin, a dihydrochalone compound, a chlorinated sucrose polymer, and combinations thereof.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the high intensity sweetener is selected from the group consisting of neotame, aspartame, sucralose and a mixture thereof.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the tensile strength modifying agent further comprises glycerol monostearate.
US Referenced Citations (357)
Number Name Date Kind
1633336 Larson Jun 1927 A
1936456 Larson Nov 1933 A
1952886 O'Brien Mar 1934 A
2191199 Hall Feb 1940 A
2197719 Conner Apr 1940 A
2876167 Manahan Mar 1959 A
2886440 Kramer et al. May 1959 A
2886441 Kramer et al. May 1959 A
2886442 Kramer et al. May 1959 A
2886443 Rosenthal et al. May 1959 A
2886444 Rosenthal et al. May 1959 A
2886445 Rosenthal et al. May 1959 A
2886446 Kramer et al. May 1959 A
2886449 Rosenthal et al. May 1959 A
3004897 Shore Oct 1961 A
3052552 Koener et al. Sep 1962 A
3117027 Lindlof et al. Jan 1964 A
3124459 Erwin et al. Mar 1964 A
3159585 Evans et al. Dec 1964 A
3241520 Wurster et al. Mar 1966 A
3341416 Anderson et al. Sep 1967 A
3475533 Mayrand et al. Oct 1969 A
3538230 Pader et al. Nov 1970 A
3664962 Kelly et al. May 1972 A
3664963 Pasin May 1972 A
3677771 Kolar, Jr. Jul 1972 A
3691090 Kitajima et al. Sep 1972 A
3795744 Ogawa et al. Mar 1974 A
3819838 Smith et al. Jun 1974 A
3821417 Westall et al. Jun 1974 A
3826847 Ogawa et al. Jul 1974 A
3857964 Yolles Dec 1974 A
3862307 Di Giulio Jan 1975 A
3872021 McKnight Mar 1975 A
3878938 Venables et al. Apr 1975 A
3897566 Bahoshy et al. Jul 1975 A
3912817 Sapsowitz Oct 1975 A
3930026 Clark Dec 1975 A
3943258 Bahoshy et al. Mar 1976 A
3962416 Katzen Jun 1976 A
3962463 Witzel Jun 1976 A
3974293 Witzel Aug 1976 A
3984574 Comollo Oct 1976 A
4032661 Rowsell et al. Jun 1977 A
4033994 Watson et al. Jul 1977 A
4037000 Burge et al. Jul 1977 A
4045581 Mackay et al. Aug 1977 A
4059118 Watson et al. Nov 1977 A
4060091 Watson et al. Nov 1977 A
4070449 Rowsell et al. Jan 1978 A
4083995 Mitchell et al. Apr 1978 A
4107360 Schmidgall Aug 1978 A
4130638 Dhabhar et al. Dec 1978 A
4136163 Watson et al. Jan 1979 A
4139639 Bahoshy et al. Feb 1979 A
4148872 Wagenknecht et al. Apr 1979 A
4150112 Wagenknecht et al. Apr 1979 A
4156715 Wagenknecht et al. May 1979 A
4156716 Wagenknecht et al. May 1979 A
4157385 Wagenknecht et al. Jun 1979 A
4159315 Wagenknecht et al. Jun 1979 A
4160054 Wagenknecht et al. Jul 1979 A
4160820 Wagenknecht et al. Jul 1979 A
4187320 Koch et al. Feb 1980 A
4193936 Watson et al. Mar 1980 A
4208431 Friello et al. Jun 1980 A
4217368 Witzel et al. Aug 1980 A
4224345 Tezuka et al. Sep 1980 A
4230688 Rowsell et al. Oct 1980 A
4271197 Hopkins et al. Jun 1981 A
4271199 Cherukuri et al. Jun 1981 A
4276312 Merritt Jun 1981 A
4295845 Sepulveda et al. Oct 1981 A
4314990 Denny, Jr. et al. Feb 1982 A
4340583 Wason Jul 1982 A
4352822 Cherukuri et al. Oct 1982 A
4352823 Cherukuri et al. Oct 1982 A
4352825 Cherukuri et al. Oct 1982 A
4363756 Sepulveda et al. Dec 1982 A
4370350 Fisher et al. Jan 1983 A
4384004 Cea et al. May 1983 A
4386106 Merritt et al. May 1983 A
4388328 Glass Jun 1983 A
4452821 Gergely Jun 1984 A
4457857 Sepulveda et al. Jul 1984 A
4459425 Amano et al. Jul 1984 A
4472437 Corsello et al. Sep 1984 A
4485118 Carroll et al. Nov 1984 A
4497832 Cherukuri et al. Feb 1985 A
4513012 Carroll et al. Apr 1985 A
4515769 Marritt et al. May 1985 A
4518615 Cherukuri et al. May 1985 A
4568560 Schobel Feb 1986 A
4585649 Lynch Apr 1986 A
4590075 Wei et al. May 1986 A
4597970 Sharma et al. Jul 1986 A
4613512 Barnett et al. Sep 1986 A
4614649 Gorman et al. Sep 1986 A
4614654 Ream et al. Sep 1986 A
4627987 Barnett et al. Dec 1986 A
4634593 Stroz et al. Jan 1987 A
4663152 Barth et al. May 1987 A
4673577 Patel Jun 1987 A
4711784 Yang Dec 1987 A
4722845 Cherukuri et al. Feb 1988 A
4726953 Carroll et al. Feb 1988 A
4740376 Yang Apr 1988 A
4741905 Huzinec May 1988 A
4749575 Rotman Jun 1988 A
4751095 Karl et al. Jun 1988 A
4752481 Dokuzovic Jun 1988 A
4753790 Silva et al. Jun 1988 A
4764382 Kydonieus et al. Aug 1988 A
4771784 Kozin et al. Sep 1988 A
4786502 Chapura et al. Nov 1988 A
4800087 Mehta Jan 1989 A
4803082 Cherukuri et al. Feb 1989 A
4804548 Sharma et al. Feb 1989 A
4816265 Cherukuri et al. Mar 1989 A
4822599 Mitra Apr 1989 A
4824681 Schobel et al. Apr 1989 A
4828845 Zamudio-Tena et al. May 1989 A
4828857 Sharma et al. May 1989 A
4842762 Sabol, Jr. et al. Jun 1989 A
4863745 Zibell Sep 1989 A
4871570 Barnett et al. Oct 1989 A
4904482 Patel et al. Feb 1990 A
4911934 Yang et al. Mar 1990 A
4915958 Faust et al. Apr 1990 A
4918182 Jackson et al. Apr 1990 A
4919841 Kamel et al. Apr 1990 A
4923684 Ibrahim et al. May 1990 A
4927646 Jenner et al. May 1990 A
4929447 Yang May 1990 A
4931293 Cherukuri et al. Jun 1990 A
4933190 Cherukuri et al. Jun 1990 A
4940588 Sparks et al. Jul 1990 A
4952402 Sparks et al. Aug 1990 A
4952407 Record et al. Aug 1990 A
4954353 Cherukuri et al. Sep 1990 A
4971797 Cherukuri et al. Nov 1990 A
4971806 Cherukuri et al. Nov 1990 A
4978537 Song Dec 1990 A
4981698 Cherukuri et al. Jan 1991 A
4985236 Ibrahim et al. Jan 1991 A
4986991 Yatka et al. Jan 1991 A
4997659 Yatka et al. Mar 1991 A
5004595 Cherukuri et al. Apr 1991 A
5009893 Cherukuri et al. Apr 1991 A
5009900 Levine et al. Apr 1991 A
5017385 Wienecke May 1991 A
5035882 Hussein et al. Jul 1991 A
5041294 Patel Aug 1991 A
5043154 Gaffar et al. Aug 1991 A
5043169 Cherukuri et al. Aug 1991 A
5057327 Yatka et al. Oct 1991 A
5057328 Cherukuri et al. Oct 1991 A
5059429 Cherukuri et al. Oct 1991 A
5064658 Cherukuri et al. Nov 1991 A
5073389 Wienecke Dec 1991 A
5080877 Chane-Ching et al. Jan 1992 A
5082671 Cherukuri Jan 1992 A
5084278 Mehta Jan 1992 A
5096699 Gaffar et al. Mar 1992 A
5096701 White, Jr. et al. Mar 1992 A
5100678 Reed et al. Mar 1992 A
5108763 Chau et al. Apr 1992 A
5126151 Bodor et al. Jun 1992 A
5139793 Johnson et al. Aug 1992 A
5139794 Patel et al. Aug 1992 A
5139798 Yatka et al. Aug 1992 A
5154939 Broderick et al. Oct 1992 A
5158790 Witkewitz et al. Oct 1992 A
5164210 Campbell et al. Nov 1992 A
5169657 Yatka et al. Dec 1992 A
5169658 Yatka et al. Dec 1992 A
5174514 Prodi Dec 1992 A
5176900 White, Jr. et al. Jan 1993 A
5198251 Song et al. Mar 1993 A
5202112 Prencipe et al. Apr 1993 A
5208009 Gaffar et al. May 1993 A
5226335 Sitte et al. Jul 1993 A
5227154 Reynolds Jul 1993 A
5227182 Song et al. Jul 1993 A
5229148 Copper Jul 1993 A
5240710 Bar-Shalom et al. Aug 1993 A
5244670 Upson et al. Sep 1993 A
5256402 Prencipe et al. Oct 1993 A
5266335 Cherukuri et al. Nov 1993 A
5266592 Grub et al. Nov 1993 A
5273741 Gaftar et al. Dec 1993 A
5284659 Cherukuri et al. Feb 1994 A
5300283 Prencipe et al. Apr 1994 A
5300305 Stapler et al. Apr 1994 A
5334375 Nabi et al. Aug 1994 A
5334396 Yatka Aug 1994 A
5336509 McGrew et al. Aug 1994 A
5352439 Norfleet et al. Oct 1994 A
5364627 Song Nov 1994 A
5372824 Record et al. Dec 1994 A
5380530 Hill Jan 1995 A
5385729 Prencipe et al. Jan 1995 A
5391315 Ashkin Feb 1995 A
5405604 Hall Apr 1995 A
5407665 McLaughlin et al. Apr 1995 A
5413799 Song et al. May 1995 A
5415880 Song et al. May 1995 A
5429827 Song et al. Jul 1995 A
5431930 Patel et al. Jul 1995 A
5437876 Synosky et al. Aug 1995 A
5437878 Panhorst et al. Aug 1995 A
5451404 Furman Sep 1995 A
5458879 Singh et al. Oct 1995 A
5462754 Synosky et al. Oct 1995 A
5474787 Grey et al. Dec 1995 A
5480668 Nofre et al. Jan 1996 A
5487902 Andersen et al. Jan 1996 A
5494689 Lee et al. Feb 1996 A
5498378 Tsaur et al. Mar 1996 A
5501864 Song et al. Mar 1996 A
5503823 Norfleet et al. Apr 1996 A
5505933 Norfleet et al. Apr 1996 A
5523098 Synosky et al. Jun 1996 A
5532004 Bell et al. Jul 1996 A
5545424 Nakatsu et al. Aug 1996 A
5582816 Mandanas et al. Dec 1996 A
5589160 Rice Dec 1996 A
5589194 Tsuei et al. Dec 1996 A
5599527 Hsu et al. Feb 1997 A
5603920 Rice Feb 1997 A
5603971 Porzio et al. Feb 1997 A
5618517 Miskewitz Apr 1997 A
5626892 Kehoe et al. May 1997 A
5629035 Miskewitz May 1997 A
5633027 Cherukuri et al. May 1997 A
5637618 Kurtz et al. Jun 1997 A
5645821 Libin Jul 1997 A
5651958 Rice Jul 1997 A
5658553 Rice Aug 1997 A
5676932 Wason et al. Oct 1997 A
5693334 Miskewitz Dec 1997 A
5698215 Kalili et al. Dec 1997 A
5702687 Miskewitz Dec 1997 A
5713738 Yarborough Feb 1998 A
5716601 Rice Feb 1998 A
5725865 Mane et al. Mar 1998 A
5736175 Cea et al. Apr 1998 A
5741524 Staniforth et al. Apr 1998 A
5744180 Cherukuri et al. Apr 1998 A
5756074 Ascioone et al. May 1998 A
5783725 Kuhn et al. Jul 1998 A
5789002 Duggan et al. Aug 1998 A
5800848 Yatka et al. Sep 1998 A
5824291 Howard Oct 1998 A
5853758 Lo Dec 1998 A
5866166 Staniforth et al. Feb 1999 A
5869028 McGill et al. Feb 1999 A
5879728 Graff et al. Mar 1999 A
5912007 Pan et al. Jun 1999 A
5939051 Santalucia et al. Aug 1999 A
5942211 Harper et al. Aug 1999 A
6027746 Lech Feb 2000 A
6056992 Lew May 2000 A
6159509 Johnson et al. Dec 2000 A
6174514 Cherukuri et al. Jan 2001 B1
6190591 Van Lengerich Feb 2001 B1
6190644 McClanahan et al. Feb 2001 B1
6239690 Burbidge et al. May 2001 B1
6261540 Nelson Jul 2001 B1
6290933 Durga et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306429 Beanlin-Kelly Oct 2001 B1
6365209 Cherukuri Apr 2002 B2
6379654 Gebreselassie et al. Apr 2002 B1
6413573 Reichart et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416744 Robinson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6428827 Song et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436461 Boumeesters et al. Aug 2002 B1
6471945 Luo et al. Oct 2002 B2
6475469 Montgomery Nov 2002 B1
6479071 Holme et al. Nov 2002 B2
6485739 Luo et al. Nov 2002 B2
6506366 Leinen et al. Jan 2003 B1
6534091 Garces Garces et al. Mar 2003 B1
6537595 Hyodo et al. Mar 2003 B1
6555093 Alvarez Hernandez Apr 2003 B2
6555145 Cherukuri Apr 2003 B1
6599542 Abdel-Malik et al. Jul 2003 B1
6623266 Jani et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627233 Wolf et al. Sep 2003 B1
6673844 Kumamoto et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685916 Holme et al. Feb 2004 B1
6692778 Yatka et al. Feb 2004 B2
6696044 Luo et al. Feb 2004 B2
6717167 Noda Apr 2004 B2
6759066 Savage et al. Jul 2004 B2
6780443 Nakatsu et al. Aug 2004 B1
6838106 Kumamoto et al. Jan 2005 B2
6974597 Ohta et al. Dec 2005 B2
6998144 Merkel et al. Feb 2006 B2
7022352 Castro et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025999 Johnson et al. Apr 2006 B2
7189760 Erman et al. Mar 2007 B2
7507427 Andersen et al. Mar 2009 B2
8389031 Boghani et al. Mar 2013 B2
8389032 Boghani et al. Mar 2013 B2
8591968 Boghani et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591972 Boghani et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591973 Boghani et al. Nov 2013 B2
8591974 Boghani et al. Nov 2013 B2
8597703 Boghani et al. Dec 2013 B2
20010008635 Quellet et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010021404 Uhlemann et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020044968 Van Lengerich Apr 2002 A1
20020122842 Seielstad Sep 2002 A1
20020150616 Gerebern Oct 2002 A1
20030004215 Van Laere et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030077362 Panhorst Apr 2003 A1
20030097088 Pacetti May 2003 A1
20030099740 Colle May 2003 A1
20030113274 Holme Jun 2003 A1
20030236183 De Bruijn et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040022817 Tardi et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040136928 Holme Jul 2004 A1
20040175489 Clark et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050019445 Wolf et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050025721 Holme Feb 2005 A1
20050112236 Boghani May 2005 A1
20050196503 Srivastava Sep 2005 A1
20050196517 Hodanko et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202143 Roy et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050208084 Ley et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210306 Rich Sep 2005 A1
20050214348 Boghani Sep 2005 A1
20050220867 Boghani Oct 2005 A1
20050260266 Gebreselassie et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060034897 Boghani Feb 2006 A1
20060068057 Boghani et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068059 Boghani et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060177383 Gebreselassie et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060251768 Bouquerand Nov 2006 A1
20060263474 Luo Nov 2006 A1
20070036733 Spence et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070048424 Moza et al. Mar 2007 A1
20080063747 Boghani et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080160138 Boghani et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080166449 Kabse et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187621 Boghani et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080199564 Boghani et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090022846 Wittorff et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090074911 Boghani et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090089167 Boghani et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090098252 Boghani et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090130250 Andersen et al. May 2009 A1
20090162418 Boghani et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090175982 Boghani et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090220642 Boghani et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100028452 Boghani et al. Feb 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (73)
Number Date Country
1208966 May 1986 CA
2238925 Nov 1999 CA
0 067 595 Dec 1982 EP
0132444 Feb 1985 EP
0 252 374 Jan 1988 EP
0 255 260 Feb 1988 EP
0 273 009 Jun 1988 EP
0 434 321 Jun 1991 EP
0 453 397 Oct 1991 EP
875763 Aug 1961 GB
1351761 Jan 1972 GB
1444024 Jul 1996 GB
2388581 Nov 2003 GB
63-245638 Oct 1988 JP
63-273947 Oct 1988 JP
20803030 Mar 1990 JP
2623769 Jun 1997 JP
9309822 Dec 1997 JP
10-512862 Dec 1998 JP
8503414 Aug 1985 WO
8800463 Jan 1988 WO
9829088 Jul 1988 WO
8903170 Apr 1989 WO
8911212 Nov 1989 WO
9004926 May 1990 WO
9013994 Nov 1990 WO
9107104 May 1991 WO
9202145 Feb 1992 WO
9206160 Apr 1992 WO
9322939 Nov 1993 WO
9507683 Mar 1995 WO
9511671 May 1995 WO
9533034 Dec 1995 WO
9619193 Jun 1996 WO
9617524 Jun 1996 WO
9620608 Jul 1996 WO
WO 9622080 Jul 1996 WO
9702009 Jan 1997 WO
9702011 Jan 1997 WO
9702273 Jan 1997 WO
9706695 Feb 1997 WO
9724036 Jul 1997 WO
9803076 Jan 1998 WO
9818339 May 1998 WO
9823165 Jun 1998 WO
9913870 Mar 1999 WO
9915032 Apr 1999 WO
9827798 Jun 1999 WO
9922798 Jun 1999 WO
9943294 Sep 1999 WO
9959428 Nov 1999 WO
9962354 Dec 1999 WO
0001253 Jan 2000 WO
0035296 Jun 2000 WO
0035298 Jun 2000 WO
0036924 Jun 2000 WO
0069282 Nov 2000 WO
0075274 Dec 2000 WO
0176384 Oct 2001 WO
0191571 Dec 2001 WO
0247489 Jun 2002 WO
02055649 Jul 2002 WO
03020047 Mar 2003 WO
03063604 Aug 2003 WO
2004006967 Jan 2004 WO
2004010998 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2004010998 Feb 2004 WO
2004064544 Aug 2004 WO
2004077956 Sep 2004 WO
2005016022 Feb 2005 WO
2005051427 Jun 2005 WO
2006079056 Jul 2006 WO
2006089200 Aug 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (39)
Entry
Machine translation of JP 2623769 B2.
Machine Translation of JP 2623769B, Nov. 21, 2009.
Lubliner, Plasticity Theory, Chapter 2, Macmillan Publishing Company, 1990.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/913,267, filed Oct. 31, 2007, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/302,255, filed Dec. 14, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,367, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,368, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,480, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,371, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,370, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,356, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,365, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,364, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/134,369, filed May 23, 2005, Boghani, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/769,909, filed Jun. 28, 2007, Boghani, et al.
JP 2083030 A, Publication date: Mar. 23, 1990, Abstract, 1 page.
“CAPROL®3GO CAS No. 9007-48-1” XP002401201. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://www.abietccorp.com/documents/3go-17—000.pdf> [retrieved on Sep. 28, 2006].
The State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China, Application No. 2006800096900, Applicant: Cadbury Adams USA LLC, Title of Invention: Controlled Release Oral Delivery Systems, Notification of the First Office Action, Date: Feb. 5, 2010, 10 pages.
DE19653100 A1, Jul. 23, 1998, Abstract Only, 1 page.
Demmers et al., “Effect of Surfacants and Proteolytic Enzymes on Artificial Calculus Formation”, Surfacents and Enzymes, Calculus, Aug. 1867, pp. 28-30.
Emulsifiers With HLB Values, Last Accessed Sep. 27, 2011, pp. 1-3, http://www.theherbarie.com/files/resource-center/formulating/Emulsifiers—HLB—Values.pdf.
European Patent Office, Application No. 06 717 548.9 1221; Ref. MG/P/85286, EP Office Communication dated: May 3, 2010, 4 pages.
ES2080703 A1, Feb. 1, 1996, Abstract Only, 1 page.
GANTREZ® AN; ISP Polymers for Oral Care; Products and Properties, last downloaded from http://www.ispcorp.com/products/oralcare/content/brochure/oral/prod.html on Jun. 9, 2004, 5 pages.
Hercules Incorporated, Technical Information Bulletin VC-566C, 2000, 6 pages.
“HLB Systems” [Online] pp. 1-4, XP002401202. Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://pharmcal.tripod.com/ch17.htm. [retrieved on Sep. 28, 2006].
JP02227044, Sep. 10, 1990, Abstract Only, 1 page.
JP6079165 A, Mar. 22, 1994, Abstract Only, 1 page.
JP8308500 A, Nov. 26, 1996, Abstract Only, 1 page.
JP9309822 A, Dec. 2, 1997, Abstract Only, 1 page.
Leffingwell, John C., “Cool without Menthol & Cooler than menthol and Cooling compounds as Insect Repellents” From the Internet: URL: http://www.leffingwell.com/cooler—than—menthol.htm [updated Apr. 5, 2006].
McClements, “Food Emulsions, Principles, Practices, and Techniques”, 2005, Contemporary Food Science, 2nd Edition, Title pages and p. 132, 3 pages.
Ottinger et al., “Quantitative Modle Studies on the Efficiency of Precursors in the Formation of Cooling-Active 1-Pyrrolidinyl-2-cyclopenten-1-ones and Bitter-Tasting Cyclopenta-[b]azepin-8(1H)-ones”, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry; 2002; pp. 5156-5161.
Ovejero-Lopez et al., “Flavor Release Measurement from Gum Model System”, J. Argic. Food Chem. 52, 2004, pp. 8119-8126.
Parikh et al., “Tensile Properties of Free Fillms Cast from Aqueous Ethylcellulose Dispersions”, Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 10, No. 6, 1993, pp. 810-815.
Prencipe et al., “Squeezing out a better toothpaste”, ChemTech., 1999, 7 pages.
Rassing, “Chewing gum as a drug delivery system”, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 13, 1994, pp. 89-121.
R085679 A2, Oct. 31, 1984, Abstract Only, 1 page.
CA2544512 Office Action, dated July 27, 2011, 2 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20050220867 A1 Oct 2005 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent PCT/US2004/037185 Nov 2004 US
Child 11083968 US
Parent 10719298 Nov 2003 US
Child PCT/US2004/037185 US