The invention relates to scintillator materials, to a manufacturing process for obtaining them and to the use of said materials, especially in gamma-ray and/or X-ray detectors.
Scintillator materials are widely used in detectors for gamma rays, X-rays, cosmic rays and particles having an energy of the order of 1 keV and also above this value.
A scintillator material is a material that is transparent in the scintillation wavelength range, which responds to incident radiation by emitting a light pulse.
It is possible to manufacture from such materials, which are generally single crystals, detectors in which the light emitted by the crystal that the detector contains is coupled to a light detection means and produces an electrical signal proportional to the number of light pulses received and to their intensity. Such detectors are used in particular in industry to measure thickness and grammage or coating weight, and in the fields of nuclear medicine, physics, chemistry and oil research.
One family of known scintillator crystals that is used is that of cerium-doped lutetium silicates. Cerium-doped Lu2SiO5 is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,080, and the U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,420 discloses Ce2x(Lu1−yYy)2(1−x)SiO5. Finally, U.S. Pat. No. 9,437,336 relates to compositions of the Lu2(1−x)M2xSi2O7 type, where M is at least partly cerium. These various scintillator compositions all have in common a high stopping power for high-energy radiation and give rise to intense light emission with very rapid light pulses.
A desirable additional property is to reduce the amount of light emitted after the incident radiation stops (i.e. delayed luminescence or afterglow). Physically, this phenomenon, well known to those skilled in the art, is explained by the presence of electron traps in the crystallographic structure of the material. The phenomenon of scintillation relies on the photoelectric effect, which creates an electron-hole pair in the scintillator material. Upon recombination on an active site (a Ce3+ site in the aforementioned scintillators), the electron emits photons via a process that generally takes place in much less than one microsecond. The aforementioned scintillators, which are particularly rapid, result in a pulse duration that decreases with a first-order exponential constant of around 40 ns. However, the trapped electrons do not generate light, but their detrapping by thermal excitation (including at room temperature) gives rise to photon emission—the afterglow—, which still remains measurable after times of greater than one second.
This phenomenon may be unacceptable in applications in which it is desired to isolate each pulse, using very short windowing. This is particularly the case with CT (computed tomography) applications (scanners) that are well known in the medical or industrial sectors. When the CT system is coupled to a PET (Positron Emission Tomography) scanner, which is becoming the standard in industry, the poorer resolution of the CT affects the performance of the entire system and therefore the capability of the clinician to interpret the result of the complete PET/CT system. Afterglow is known to be completely unacceptable for these applications.
Compositions of the lutetium silicates type, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,080 (of the LSO:Ce type, using the notation of those skilled in the art) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,624,420 (of the LYSO:Ce type) are known to generate a significant afterglow. In contrast, the compositions disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,437,336 (of the LPS:Ce type) have the advantage of a much weaker afterglow. These results are given for example by L. Pidol, A. Kahn-Harari, B. Viana, B. Ferrand, P. Dorenbos, J. de Haas, C. W. E. van Eijk and E. Virey in “Scintillation properties of Lu2Si2O7:Ce3+, a fast and dense scintillator crystal”, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2003, 15, 2091-2102. The curve shown in
The behavior of LYSO is very similar to that of LSO from this standpoint. The reduction in this afterglow forms the subject of the present application.
The afterglow property may be demonstrated more fundamentally by thermoluminescence (see S. W. S. McKeever “Thermoluminescence of solids”, Cambridge University Press (1985)). This characterization consists in thermally exciting a specimen after irradiation and measuring the light emission. A light peak close to room temperature at 300 K corresponds to an afterglow of greater or lesser magnitude depending on its intensity (detrapping). A peak at a higher temperature corresponds to the existence of traps that are deeper but less susceptible to thermal excitation at room temperature. This is illustrated in
However, compositions of the LPS type have the drawback of a lower stopping power than those of the LSO or LYSO type. This situation stems simply from the average atomic number of the compound and from the density of the associated phase.
Thermoluminescence measurements may be carried out using an automated TL-DA-15 instrument, manufactured by RISO (Denmark), shown schematically in
In our case, the emission that interests us is that from the cerium ion, between about 350 and 450 nm. We have chosen matched filters (HA3 and 7-59) at the entry of the photomultiplier. For quantitative measurements, the irradiation takes place in situ by a 90Sr/90Y β-source delivering a dose of 3.6 gray/h in air. The parameters that can be varied during the TL (thermoluminescence) measurements are the dose (irradiation time, here 20 s) and the heating rate (here, 0.5 K/s).
The Applicant has discovered that the addition of a divalent alkaline earth metal M and/or of a trivalent metal M′ to an LYSO-type composition very substantially reduces the afterglow. In particular, M may be Ca, Mg or Sr (in divalent cation form). In particular, M′ may be Al, Ga or In (in trivalent cation form). The element M substitutes for Y or Lu and the element M′ substitutes for Si.
Surprisingly, the products according to the invention, thanks to the introduction of M, especially Ca, reduce the afterglow without affecting the density within the proportions considered.
The scintillator material according to the invention is of formula:
Lu(2−y)Y(y-z−x)CexMzSi(1−v)M′vO5 (Formula 1)
M represents a divalent alkaline earth metal, such as Ca, Mg or Sr, and M′ represents a trivalent metal, such Al, Ga or In,
Preferably, (z+v) is greater than or equal to 0.0002.
Preferably, (z+v) is less than or equal to 0.05 and more preferably less than or equal to 0.01, and even less than 0.001.
Preferably, x is greater than 0.0001 and less than 0.001.
In particular, v may be zero (absence of M′), in which case z is at least 0.0001.
In particular, the scintillator material according to the invention may be such that v is zero. The scintillator material according to the invention may also be such that M is Ca, which corresponds to a particularly suitable composition. The combination of v being zero with M being Ca as particularly suitable. The composition according to the invention then has the following formula:
Lu(2−y)Y(y−z−x)CexCa2SiO5 (Formula II)
The scintillator material according to the invention may in particular also be such that z is zero. The scintillator material according to the invention may in particular also be such that M′ is Al. The combination of z being zero with M′ being Al is particularly suitable. The composition according to the invention then has the following formula:
Lu(2−y)Y(y−x)CexAlvSi(1−v)O5 (Formula III)
The molar content of the element 0 is substantially five times that of (Si+M′), it being understood that this value may vary by about ±2%.
The scintillator material according to the invention can be obtained in the form of a single crystal or a single crystal by Czochralski growth.
The invention also relates to the use of the scintillator material according to the invention as a component of a radiation detector, in particular a gamma-ray and/or X-ray detector, especially in CT (Computed Tomography) scanners.
The invention also relates to the use of the scintillator material according to the invention as a component of a scintillation detector, especially for applications in industry, for the medical field and/or for detection in oil drilling. In particular, this involves any scintillator system with continuous acquisition (which include CT tomography). Also involved is any scintillator system of the positron emission tomography type, especially with time-of-flight measurement), optionally combined with emission tomography.
Without the Applicant being tied down to any particular theoretical argument, it is assumed that the introduction of a divalent alkaline earth metal ion M substituting for a trivalent rare-earth ion, or of a trivalent metal ion M′ substituting for a tetravalent silicon atom, creates a positive charge deficit that limits the trapping of electrons responsible for the afterglow.
Three LYSO:Ce single crystals 1 inch in diameter were produced using the Czochralski method under conditions identical to those described in the aforementioned patents. To do this, raw materials corresponding to the following compositions were used:
Control (with no Ca):
The charges were prepared from the corresponding oxides (Ca, Ce, Lu, Y oxides) so as to obtain the desired formulae. The actual Ce and Ca concentrations in the final crystal were lower than those introduced via the raw materials through segregation during crystal growth.
The single crystals finally obtained, of formula Lu(2−y)Y(y−z−x)CexCa2SiO5, had the following compositions at the top of the specimen:
Composition 1 gave a significantly lower afterglow than the control composition (of the conventional LYSO type) and an estimated light level of 20 000 photons/MeV under excitation by a 137Cs gamma-ray source, i.e. slightly less than the LPS composition (26 000 photons/MeV), the LYSO composition (34 000 photons/MeV) and the LSO composition (about 28 000 photons/MeV). Such a light level is far from unacceptable for most applications. Bismuth germanate (Bi4Ge3O12), very widely used, emits only 9 000 photons/MeV. Overall, composition 1 has as much stopping power as an LYSO-type composition without significantly losing out in terms of light level, while still significantly reducing the afterglow.
Composition 2 is even more advantageous, with a still lower afterglow and a light yield of 27 000 photons/MeV.
|04 51815||Aug 2004||FR||national|
This application is a continuation application of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/358,341 filed Nov. 22, 2016, which is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/039,888 filed Sep. 27, 2013; now U.S. Pat. No. 9,534,170, which is a continuation application of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/214,648 filed Aug. 22, 2011; now U.S. Pat. No. 8,574,458, which is a divisional of Ser. No. 12/622,881 filed on Nov. 20, 2009; now U.S. Pat. No. 8,034,258, which is a divisional application of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/573,323 which is a National Stage of PCT/FR05/50658 filed on Aug. 8, 2005; now U.S. Pat. No. 7,651,632, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C § 119 from French Patent Application No. 045181.5, filed Aug. 9, 2004, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
|4747973||Cusano et al.||May 1988||A|
|4783596||Riedner et al.||Nov 1988||A|
|5998925||Shimizu et al.||Dec 1999||A|
|6093347||Lynch et al.||Jul 2000||A|
|6278832||Zagumennyl et al.||Aug 2001||B1|
|6437336||Pauwels et al.||Aug 2002||B1|
|6624420||Chai et al.||Sep 2003||B1|
|6921901||Chai et al.||Jul 2005||B1|
|7132060||Zagumennyl et al.||Nov 2006||B2|
|7180068||Brecher et al.||Feb 2007||B1|
|7531036||Shimura et al.||May 2009||B2|
|7618491||Kurata et al.||Nov 2009||B2|
|7651632||Ferrand et al.||Jan 2010||B2|
|7692153||Shimizu et al.||Apr 2010||B2|
|7749323||Shimura et al.||Jul 2010||B2|
|8034258||Ferrand et al.||Oct 2011||B2|
|8062419||Andreaco et al.||Nov 2011||B1|
|8278624||Koschan et al.||Oct 2012||B2|
|8394195||Andreaco et al.||Mar 2013||B2|
|8574458||Ferrand et al.||Nov 2013||B2|
|8617422||Koschan et al.||Dec 2013||B2|
|8999281||Kurata et al.||Apr 2015||B2|
|9328288||Cohen et al.||May 2016||B2|
|9534170||Ferrand et al.||Jan 2017||B2|
|20020144640||Andreaco et al.||Oct 2002||A1|
|20030020044||Lyons et al.||Jan 2003||A1|
|20030062465||Pauwels et al.||Apr 2003||A1|
|20030159643||Sumiya et al.||Aug 2003||A1|
|20040108492||Derenzo et al.||Jun 2004||A1|
|20040200964||Lefaucheur et al.||Oct 2004||A1|
|20040245479||Misawa et al.||Dec 2004||A1|
|20050082484||Srivastava et al.||Apr 2005||A1|
|20050104000||Kindem et al.||May 2005||A1|
|20050211906||Tonami et al.||Sep 2005||A1|
|20060266277||Usui et al.||Nov 2006||A1|
|20060288926||Kurata et al.||Dec 2006||A1|
|20080089824||Shimura et al.||Apr 2008||A1|
|20100078595||Eriksson et al.||Apr 2010||A1|
|20100327227||Kurata et al.||Dec 2010||A1|
|20120126171||Andreaco et al.||May 2012||A1|
|20150069298||Kurata et al.||Mar 2015||A1|
|20160002529||Blahuta et al.||Jan 2016||A1|
|20160252631||Blahuta et al.||Sep 2016||A1|
|0 097 296||Jan 1987||EP|
|0 795 631||Sep 1997||EP|
|1 028 154||Aug 2000||EP|
|Zavartsev, et al, “Czochralski growth and characterisation of large Ce3 + :Lu2SiO5 Single crystals co-doped with Mg2 + or Ca2 + or Tb3 + for scintillators”, Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 275, No. 1-2, pp. e2167-e2171 (2005).|
|Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2012, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-525327 (with English translation).|
|Maria D. Alba et at, “Formation of High-Temperature Lutetium Disilicate from Lutetium-Saturated Aluminosilicates in Mild Conditions. Incorporation of Si and Al XAS Techniques to the Study of These Systems”, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 1996, pp. 19559-19567.|
|Michael E. Fleet et at., “The Structure of NaCa2LuSi2O7F2, A Synthetic Phase of the Cuspidine Group”, The Canadian Mineralogist, vol. 33, 1995, pp. 879-884.|
|20190257958 A1||Aug 2019||US|