1. Field of the Invention
The present application relates to a dental bar and a method of designing a dental bar and, more particularly, to an overdenture bar design and a computer-aided process of designing an overdenture bar.
2. Description of the Related Art
An overdenture bar or dental bar can be an important part the implant-based dental restorations for partially dentate, edentulous or fully edentulous patients. Implant-based dental restorations can have many advantages over standard removable dental restorations since the dental implants can enable the patient to get firmer bites. An important step in the dental restoration process is the fabrication of the overdenture or dental bar. The overdenture bar is supported on the installed dental implants in the patient and also supports the denture. The denture can be removable or permanently attached (e.g., polymerized) to the overdenture bar. In this manner, the overdenture bar structurally supports the denture on the installed dental implants.
In the past, overdenture bars were manually designed by a dental technician. This process was a lengthy and labor intensive process. Today, there exist techniques for generating patient-specific or custom overdenture bars. The NobelProcera™ Implant Bar Overdenture system, for example, involves a computer-aided design (“CAD”) and/or a computer-aided manufacturing (“CAM”) process in which the individualized overdenture bars are custom made to fit implants previously installed in a patient. In such a system, a dentist can take an impression of a patient's mouth using conventional procedures. In this manner, the position and orientation of the existing dental implants in a patient's mouth can be recorded. A dental laboratory then fabricates a model of the patient's mouth from the impression and can fabricate devices to record the maxillo-mandibular relationship. The dentist can verify and record the maxillo-mandibular relationship using conventional procedures. The dental laboratory then fabricates a wax setup and sends it to the dentist for a trial fitting in the patient to ensure correct function, esthetics and phonetics. The model and wax setup can then be scanned in using a scanner (e.g., a NobelProcera Scanner). Using a CAD/CAM system (e.g., NobelProcera Software), the dental laboratory can design a wide variety of implant bars on many different implant systems. The CAD data of the overdenture bar can be sent to a manufacturing center, where via computer-aided manufacturing, the overdenture bar is created (e.g., through precision milling). The overdenture bar can then be shipped to the dental laboratory along with clinical screws, and if desired, additional attachments. The laboratory can finalize the restoration and position the restoration on the overdenture bar and send the restoration and the overdenture bar to the dentist for installation.
While such techniques have proven to be advantageous and useful, there is a general desire to continue to improve the design of such overdenture bars.
Accordingly, disclosed herein is an overdenture bar and methods of producing an overdenture bar using CAD/CAM processing.
In accordance with one embodiment, an overdenture bar comprises a U-shaped support beam configured to being coupled to a plurality of dental implants and extending generally above the mucus membrane. The U-shaped support beam can include an anterior region and a pair of posterior portions. At least one portion of the U-shaped support beam includes a plurality of retention elements extending generally normal to an outer surface of the U-shaped support beam in a plurality of directions.
In accordance with one embodiment, an overdenture bar comprises a U-shaped support beam configured to being attached to a plurality of dental implants and extending generally above the mucus membrane. The U-shaped support beam can include an anterior region and a pair of posterior extensions. The U-shaped support beam can have a cross-sectional profile in which the posterior extensions are wider than the anterior region.
In accordance with one embodiment, an overdenture bar comprises a U-shaped support beam configured to being attached to a plurality of dental implants and extending generally above the mucus membrane. The U-shaped support beam includes an anterior region and a pair of posterior extensions. The U-shaped support beam includes a one or more protrusions extending from an upper surface of the U-shaped bar. In one arrangement, the bar includes a denture comprising a plurality of replacement teeth and the one or more protrusions are aligned with at least some of the plurality of teeth.
In further arrangements, the overdenture bar described above can include a denture having denture material wrapped around at least a portion of the overdenture bar.
In accordance with one embodiment, a method for producing a dental bar model to be fitted on a patient's upper or lower gingival surface is provided. The method comprises selecting a longitudinal portion of the bar; and modifying the cross-sectional profile of the bar. In one further arrangement, the step of modifying the cross-sectional profile of the bar includes modifying an anterior region of the bar. In another arrangement, modifying the anterior region of the bar includes making a cross-section of the anterior region thinner than a portion of the posterior extensions of the bar.
In accordance with one embodiment, a method for producing a dental bar model to be fitted on a patient's upper or lower gingival surface is provided. The method comprises a design phase in which the following steps are performed: selecting a longitudinal portion of the bar, and adding protrusions to an upper portion of the bar. In one further arrangement, the design phase of the bar includes the step of positioning one or more finish lines. In one further arrangement, the design phase of the bar includes a menu option for providing a buccal finish line and a lingual finish line, preferably between two boundary lines, wherein said boundary lines illustrate the highest and lowest position of the finish lines.
In accordance with one embodiment, a method for producing a dental bar model to be fitted on a patient's upper or lower gingival surface is provided. The method comprises design phase in which the following steps are performed: selecting an area on a surface of the bar, and adding retention elements to the surface of the bar. In one further arrangement, the design phase of the bar includes the step of adding multiple retention elements to the surface of the bar. In one further arrangement, the design phase of the bar includes a menu option for specifying a dimension of the retention element.
In further arrangements, the methods described above can also include adding a wrap around denture to the bar.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, wherein like numerals refer to like elements throughout. Although several embodiments, examples and illustrations are disclosed below, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention described herein extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments, examples and illustrations, and can include other uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. The terminology used in the description presented herein is not intended to be interpreted in any limited or restrictive manner simply because it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the invention. In addition, embodiments of the invention can comprise several novel features and no single feature is solely responsible for its desirable attributes or is essential to practicing the inventions herein described.
As will be described, the present application relates to an overdenture or dental bar and a method of designing an overdenture or dental bar and, more particularly, to an improved structure for an overdenture bar design and a computer-aided process of designing such an overdenture or dental bar. It should be appreciated that while the figures and description herein often refer to an overdenture bar, which are particularly useful for treating fully edentulous patients, in modified embodiments, the overdenture or dental bar can be configured to treat patients that are not fully edentulous (e.g., partially edentulous).
The dental bar 100 of
In addition to, or as an alternative to, the features of
In one embodiment, the CAD software can provide a handle line positioned at or near the crest of the support flange 130. The CAD user can then manipulate the handle line to shape the upper edge of the support flange 130 to form the protrusions 150. In one arrangement, an image of a wax build up of the denture can be superimposed on the image of the bar 100 such that user can align the protrusions 150 with the tooth structures.
With continued reference to
With reference to
With further reference to
The retention elements 180 of
The above described retention elements 180 advantageously improve the retention of the wrap around denture material (e.g., acrylic) to the dental bar 100 framework. This additional support can reduce the risk of delamination, micro-movement and/or breakage of the denture material (e.g., acrylic). Another advantage of the retention elements 180 is that they can significantly enlarge the surface and/or retention area of the overdenture bar 100 without enlarging the ground structure or contact points of the bar 100 with the installed dental implants. This allows the denture material (e.g., acrylic) to have a uniform, constant and/or substantially constant thickness, which aids in aesthetics and longevity.
In the above described planning features, the CAD user can have the capability to do an optimal and virtual (CAD) design of the framework while incorporating optimal retention elements 180 for supporting the denture material (e.g., acrylic) and for the longevity of the restoration. The retention elements 180 can also simply the work in a fabrication lab by facilitating easier handling and/or easier and/or lesser manual application of the denture material (e.g., acrylic and/or composite materials) and individual layering. A further advantage of the use of retention elements 180 is the retention elements 180 can fill up volume in the overall dental restoration, which can result in the use of less denture material and therefore can reduce the cost of the denture. One advantage of incorporating the retention elements 180 in the CAD/CAM design process is improved manufacturing of the device. The retention elements 180 can be based on manufacturing and/or milling strategies that can be pre-defined (e.g., in “D-file” format) allowing the CAM process to be executed effectively.
In one arrangement, the CAD software includes manual positioning of the finish lines through handles. In one embodiment, a menu option is provided for the lingual finish line 210 and the buccal finish line 220. When this menu option is selected, handles can be enabled or disabled. The height of both finish lines can be sized to fit between the two horizontal lines 230, 240 shown in
With reference to the schematic
In one embodiment that can be used with the features described above or as a separate feature, the user can set the posterior extensions 120 as of Montreal bar type through a checkbox. The shape of the portions can be described in a “Lingual/buccal acrylic finish line adjustment tool” that consists of the shape of the wrap-around free form bar type with the lingual 210 and buccal 220 acrylic finish lines. The rest of the bar 100 can have a wrap-around free form shape. The default Montreal cross-sectional shape can be larger than the wrap-around free form shape, respecting a minimum distance everywhere on the bottom surface of the Montreal bar, in order to create a clean acrylic finish in the transition area of the two bar types. As depicted in
When the design of the bar is completed, in one embodiment, the CAD/CAM file is sent to a manufacturing facility. In one embodiment, the bar can be milled machined, or otherwise formed out of a single piece of titanium. The formed bars can be shipped with either a polished shape or a non-polished shape. In one embodiment, the formed bars can have non-polished shape and the support posts can have a polished shape. Clinical screws can be packaged with the completed bar without requiring a separate order.
In various embodiments, the computer 310 may include one or more processors, one or more memories, and/or one or more communication mechanisms. In some embodiments, more than one computer 310 may be used to execute the modules, methods, and processes discussed herein. Additionally, the modules and processes herein may each run on one or multiple processors, on one or more computers; or the modules herein may run on dedicated hardware. The input devices 330 may include one or more keyboards (one-handed or two-handed), mice, touch screens, voice commands and associated hardware, gesture recognition, or any other means of providing communication between the operator 340 and the computer 310.
The display 320 may be a 2D or 3D display and may be based on any technology, such as LCD, CRT, plasma, projection or the like. The scanner 350 may be a 2D or 3D scanner. In some embodiments, scanner 350 can accomplish 3D scanning by using time-of-flight calculations, triangulation, conoscopic holography, structured light, modulated light, computed tomography, microtomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or any appropriate technology or technique. In some embodiments, scanner 350 can accomplish 3D 3D using x-rays, visible light, laser light, ultrasound radiation, or any other appropriate radiation or technology. In some embodiments, scanner 350 can accomplish 3D scanning using stereoscopy, photometry, silhouetting, touch probe, or any other appropriate technique.
The communication among the various components of system 300 may be accomplished via any appropriate coupling, including USB, VGA cables, coaxial cables, FireWire, serial cables, parallel cables, SCSI cables, IDE cables, SATA cables, wireless based on 802.11 or Bluetooth, or any other wired or wireless connection(s). One or more of the components in system 300 may also be combined into a single unit. In some embodiments, all of the electronic components of system 300 are included in a single physical unit.
As will be apparent, the features and attributes of the specific embodiments disclosed herein may be combined in different ways to form additional embodiments, all of which fall within the scope of the present disclosure.
Conditional language used herein, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” “may,” “e.g.,” and the like, unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or states. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or states are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without author input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or states are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached figures should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art.
All of the methods and processes described herein may be embodied in, and fully automated via, software code modules executed by one or more general purpose computers or processors, such as those computer systems described herein. The code modules may be stored in any type of computer-readable medium or other computer storage device. Some or all of the methods may alternatively be embodied in specialized computer hardware.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Additionally, the skilled artisan will recognize that any of the above-described methods can be carried out using any appropriate apparatus. Further, the disclosure herein of any particular feature, aspect, method, property, characteristic, quality, attribute, element, or the like in connection with an embodiment can be used in all other embodiments set forth herein. For all of the embodiments described herein the steps of the methods need not be performed sequentially. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/713,412, filed on Oct. 12, 2012, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3514858 | Silverman | Jun 1970 | A |
4689013 | Lustig | Aug 1987 | A |
4741698 | Andrews | May 1988 | A |
4767328 | Branemark | Aug 1988 | A |
4931016 | Sillard | Jun 1990 | A |
4932016 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5052928 | Andersson | Oct 1991 | A |
5234341 | Johansen | Aug 1993 | A |
5419700 | Sillard | May 1995 | A |
5427906 | Hansen | Jun 1995 | A |
5429505 | Fortin | Jul 1995 | A |
5460526 | Bosker | Oct 1995 | A |
5675070 | Gelperin | Oct 1997 | A |
5716214 | Lund et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725376 | Poirier | Mar 1998 | A |
6250924 | Luotio | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6305938 | Branemark | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322364 | Oshida et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6382975 | Poirier | May 2002 | B1 |
6413660 | Daskalon et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6527553 | Yeung | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6607386 | Andersson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6666684 | Names | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6814575 | Poirier | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6902401 | Jorneus et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915178 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7175435 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7214061 | Fortin | May 2007 | B2 |
7234940 | Weissman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7279054 | Cascone | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7331789 | Karmaker et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7463942 | O'Brien et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7747418 | Leu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7806691 | Berger | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8457772 | Giasson | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8892235 | Choi | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20030183964 | Daskalon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211444 | Andrews | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040120781 | Luca et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040197737 | Uckelmann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050123879 | Andersson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142517 | Frysh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050221258 | Hall | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266382 | Soler et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060105294 | Burger et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060223029 | Berger | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070082321 | Uckelmann et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070190490 | Giorno | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070264612 | Mount | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080020343 | Mount | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080050700 | Weber et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080090208 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080138758 | Fricke | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080241798 | Holzner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248441 | Clerck | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286718 | Franke et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090004626 | Goldman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090248184 | Steingart | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090325125 | DiAngelo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120058449 | Sklarski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120088208 | Schulter et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094253 | Berger | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120179281 | Steingart | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130216974 | Schmalzle et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140162211 | Mullaly et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140178839 | Berger | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150238290 | Wouters | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 2006 011 340 | Jan 2007 | DE |
2 345 386 | Jul 2011 | EP |
WO 2006103648 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2010139031 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2012041329 | Apr 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Photos from a third party (Panthera) website downloaded Nov. 22, 2012. |
Letter dated Aug. 12, 2014 from Brian E. Ainsworth including Attachment 1 (partially redacted) and Attachment 2. |
Affidavit of Martin Robillard dated Mar. 7, 2013. |
Screenshots obtained in Oct. 2012 from a third party (Panthera) website. |
Screenshots from a third party (Panthera) website dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140106303 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61713412 | Oct 2012 | US |