The present invention relates to frameworks for dental implant-supported prostheses produced either by conventional dental laboratory procedures including CAD/CAM or by virtual technology. More specifically, it relates to a framework using a uniquely designed set of prosthetic teeth and internal abutments specific to the individual tooth position.
A framework for a dental prosthesis as shown in
The traditional or conventional dental laboratory method for creating these frameworks is based on the manual design of a physical model of the framework in wax or resin and the production of the framework by means of lost wax casting or copy milling. These previous methods of framework production can be highly precise however they require very skilled dental laboratory technicians doing time-consuming modeling of the frame, a process that is inefficient and costly. The traditional lost wax process is very lengthy and highly labor intensive, consisting of many manual steps that include the design, manual contour and fabrication of the wax pattern, investing the pattern in a refractory mold, melting and evaporating the wax pattern in a high temperature burn out oven over many hours, melting the metal and casting it into the pattern mold, devesting the solidified metal framework and refining the surface of the framework to permit the next phase to begin. A current alternative to the lost wax casting method of framework construction is the use of CAD/CAM technology to scan the wax or resin pattern frame and robotic ally mill a precise copy of the pattern. Framework production by virtual technology is available but its ability to create tooth support mechanisms is limited.
Following completion of the metal or ceramic framework, impressions of that framework are made and stone casts are produced to replicate the metal framework. These casts are then cut into sections providing individual stone dies being replicas of the vertical tooth support portion of the framework pattern, upon which individual teeth are manually created from wax relying on the artistic skill of the dental technician. These individual teeth may then be either scanned or copy milled in a tooth colored material. These steps of custom fabrication of the individual prosthetic teeth are eliminated by the present invention thus avoiding time-consuming and highly skilled labor required of the dental technicians and ceramists. Furthermore, later if a tooth needs to be replaced because it has become worn or chipped, the above-described process must be repeated to provide a replacement for that tooth. There is therefore a need in the dental arts for a method of prosthesis production which is less time-consuming and labor-intensive and which requires less skill. Further, there is a need for such a system which can also provide the highest quality result for the patient.
In order to meet the needs in the art described above, the present invention has been devised which for the first time provides a rapid and precisely accurate method of prosthesis production that is highly repeatable, requiring limited technical ability by dental technicians.
This is achieved by a simplified system for the production of the final implant-supported prosthesis by using the identical tooth set that was used at or shortly after the surgical placement of the implants for the provisional temporary prosthesis. By using the identical tooth set of the final prosthesis, the provisional prosthesis becomes the prototype for the position of the teeth in the final prosthesis. This position can be recorded manually with a variety of indices or virtually by scanning the provisional teeth. In an optional more advanced adaptation of the invention, individual tooth data files can be incorporated into software systems to accelerate the process by virtual construction of the framework followed by CNC copy milling. It also provides “off the shelf’ future replacement teeth that will fit the vertical framework supports precisely should tooth wear or fracture occur with patient natural function.
As further described in greater detail herein, the present invention provides premanufactured prosthetic teeth available in resin, ceramic, or wax, with highly specific and precise matching internal struts (hereinafter “keys”) that are use to support the teeth when affixed to the horizontal beam of the unified framework. Once the tooth arrangement selected from a library of individual teeth has been determined to be positioned appropriately for individual patient function and appearance, this setup position of the teeth is recorded either physically or digitally. Based on the position of the teeth with the vertical keys still occupying each individual tooth (hereafter “keyed teeth”), the keyed teeth pairs are easily and quickly connected to the horizontal beam during its formation with a wax or resin or connected virtually in a computer design system containing the specific files for the tooth matching vertical keys.
Once the properly positioned keyed teeth have the keys attached to the horizontal beam, the teeth are removed from the keys revealing the completed pattern. This pattern, either wax or resin, can then be invested and cast using traditional dental laboratory methods, or it can be scanned and the file transmitted to a CNC milling machine for the production of the metal or ceramic framework. Whether cast or milled, the present framework is composed of a very rigid and highly precise metal or ceramic that is biocompatible and capable of resisting complex heavy loading forces applied to the specific individual teeth, providing long term functionality required by implant-supported prostheses.
When the framework is completed, the previous set of keyway teeth can be installed onto the framework and fused to the frame with a luting cement. The prosthesis is then completed with the application of pink gingival resin or composite material. Replacement of teeth on the framework will be precise and accurate due to the high level of fit of the individual teeth to the vertical keys.
In general terms the invention may be described as a method for producing a prosthetic tooth support framework including a horizontal beam, vertical support struts and implant prosthetic connectors comprising the steps of:
constructing a working model of at least a portion of a human dental arch;
arranging pre-manufactured teeth on said model to create a prototype setup representing a finished prosthesis, said teeth each including an axial internal keyway for receiving a key;
inserting a plurality of keys into a closely fitting keyway of the teeth forming keyed tooth
pairs, an attachment portion of each key extending from a base of each tooth;
model, said model including implant prosthetic connectors;
affixing said key attachment portions onto a horizontal beam and said implant prosthetic connectors while held in said setup location during the formation of a beam assembly;
removing the teeth from the beam assembly leaving a framework pattern; and
constructing a finished prosthetic tooth framework using said beam assembly as a pattern, the pattern keys each matching the configuration and location of the permanent teeth support struts of said finished framework.
The present invention may comprise a free-standing one-piece key utilized in forming a pattern for a prosthetic framework strut that may be affixed upon one or more implants or implant abutments within a prosthetic tooth, the key comprising a shaft having a coronal aspect at a coronal end of the shaft, a retention knob at an opposite end of the coronal end, the retention knob having a width greater than that of the shaft and the shaft at the coronal end being configured to fit within a socket of a tooth comprising an axial internal keyway, a cervical platform between the retention knob and the coronal end, and comprising a supporting base of the key, the cervical platform further having circumference configured to support a cervical aspect of the tooth. The key may include an elongate channel extending along a surface of the shaft to cervical platform for the expulsion of excess adhesive fluid, wherein said channel may be an axial groove that forms a release opening at a margin between the tooth and the cervical platform, forming a release opening at a margin between the tooth and the cervical platform. The shaft may inwardly tapered from said platform toward the coronal aspect of the key. The retention knob of the key may be a spheroid or other shapes that are greater than diameter or width of the shaft. The shaft may resemble a triangular prism.
The present invention may further comprise a vertical strut component to be disposed between a prosthetic framework model and a socket of a prosthetic tooth socket, the strut comprising an elongate shaft having a coronal aspect at a first end of the shaft, a retentive element at a second end of the shaft, the retention element having a width greater than that of the shaft so that it may be mechanically fitted within a prosthetic frame work model, and the coronal aspect being configured to fit within a socket of a tooth comprising an axial internal keyway, a cervical platform between the first and second end having a width greater than the shaft and being configured to support a cervical aspect of the prosthetic tooth, an elongate channel extending along a surface of the shaft to cervical platform for the expulsion of excess adhesive fluid, wherein said channel is an axial groove that forms a release opening at a margin between the tooth and the cervical platform. The shaft may comprise a second elongate channel on an opposite side of the shaft, so that a cross-section of the shaft having an elongate channel and a second elongate channel generally resembles the letter
This prosthesis construction has many advantages over traditional dental laboratory methods for framework production. These advantages include but are not limited to the following: 1) significant reduction in the time for the labor intense design, 2) fabrication of the framework pattern is simplified by the use of the keys due to the use of standardized key way teeth, 3) technician skill required is reduced due to the simplified pattern fabrication, and 4) maintenance of the implant-supported prosthesis is easier because the replacement teeth are cataloged and the replacement teeth can still be modified or customized to meet specific patient requirements.
Accordingly, it is the main object of the present invention to provide a procedure and method for the production of a high-strength biocompatible dental implant-supported framework with individually specific vertical keys to support sets of individual prosthetic teeth in a timesaving and labor-saving system.
It is a further objective to produce these frameworks manually with traditional dental laboratory (lost wax), copy milled or constructed virtually so that the resultant framework will have a precision fit to the implants of less than 50 microns.
It is another object of the present invention is to offer a diversified system that consists of prosthetic teeth in various shapes, sizes and colors that can be used with a manually built framework pattern.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an implant-supported prosthesis that permits the cementation of selected prefabricated teeth onto a framework, thereby eliminating the custom fabrication of individual teeth by dental technicians.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of easy tooth replacement in the future for patients who have worn or chipped a tooth or a portion of the prosthesis through natural function or accidental trauma.
In this respect, before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and to the arrangements of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception, upon which this disclosure is based, may readily be utilized as a basis for the designing of other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the present invention. It is important, therefore, that the claims be regarded as including such equivalent constructions insofar as they do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
A step-by-step process showing the methodology and use of the novel structures comprising the invention is depicted in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The keyway teeth are preferably coated with an opaque layer for color control and are cataloged in various shapes and sizes available in numerous shades (colors) just as any traditional denture tooth line. Each different tooth geometry is provided in the above materials.
The position of the prosthetic screw access channel may dictate the selection of the material used for a given keyway tooth position. By way of example, if the prosthetic screw access channel is directly through the occlusal table of the molar, it may be advantageous to use the wax version of that keyway tooth. The wax keyway tooth can be modified with a hole to provide direct access to the prosthetic retention screw. After modification, the wax version of the keyway tooth can be invested and finalized with a pressed ceramic. In another example, if the prosthetic screw access channel impinges on the cervical margin of the keyway tooth, it may be advantageous to use the green state tooth with appropriate marginal adaptation to accommodate the screwdriver access to the retention screw. Following adaptation would be the crystallization of the green state to a solid ceramic keyway tooth. The keyway teeth also have a cervical groove 50 to aid in retention as a mechanical interlock with the gingival veneering material once the tooth is luted to the framework in a final step in the process shown in
As shown in
One of the main advantages of the present invention is that it can utilize more commonplace dental laboratory skills and equipment or alternatively can be utilized with technologically advanced optical scanning. This makes the invention available to the greatest number of users. This more commonplace practice will now be discussed.
Once the tooth setup position has been determined, that position is recorded manually with laboratory indices or virtually in computer programming to dictate the position of the individual teeth and keys as depicted in the layout shown in
The matrix has pockets 43 that can hold each of their respective teeth in its proper position while leaving the bottom portions of the teeth exposed as shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
The horizontal beam assembly 13 is then removed from the model and the teeth removed from the keys. The remaining structure is refined providing the pattern depicted in
a) Traditional lost wax technique where the framework pattern is invested, burned out and metal is cast into the mold, or
b) Copy milling using scanning technology where the framework pattern is scanned and data files are developed and transmitted to robotic milling machines for the milling of the final framework from a variety of solid materials (metal or ceramic by example).
As an option, the above-described procedure following the finished setup can be replaced by more advanced technology which permits the virtual construction of the framework from an optical scanning of the finished setup. In concert with the use of computer software which includes the three-dimensional characteristics of virtual keys that correspond to the individual scanned teeth in the setup, the location and orientation of the keys is then combined with a framework pattern that creates a file which is then copy milled by a CNC milling machine to create the final framework.
When prosthetic retention screws have their access channel coming through any portion of the keyway tooth, that tooth (either in wax or green state) will be manually or virtually modified to permit screwdriver access to the head of the screw. Acrylic, wax and green state keyway teeth may be modified or customized to accommodate the opposing occlusion, or individual cosmetic patient requirements.
With the final framework 52 completed, the selected teeth are cemented to the metal or ceramic framework as shown in
Therefore, the foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention. For example, this invention can be applied to totally or partially edentulous patients being restored with osseointegrated dental implants.
This patent application is a continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 15/191,868 entitled “DENTAL PROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF ITS PRODUCTION UTILIZING STANDARDIZED FRAMEWORK KEYS AND MATCHING PREMANUFACTURED TEETH” filed Jun. 24, 2016 and a continuation of co-pending patent Ser. No. 14/495,036 filed Sep. 24, 2014, entitled “DENTAL PROSTHESIS AND METHOD OF ITS PRODUCTION UTILIZING STANDARDIZED FRAMEWORK KEYS AND MATCHING PREMANUFACTURED TEETH”, which is a divisional of patent application Ser. No. 13/343,566, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,875,398, entitled “Dental Prosthesis and Method of its Production Utilizing Standardized Framework Keys and Matching Premanufactured Teeth” filed Jan. 4, 2012, priority from which is hereby claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200445 | Fahnestock | Feb 1878 | A |
321847 | Peirce et al. | Jul 1885 | A |
711324 | Lacy | Oct 1902 | A |
830887 | Robert | Sep 1906 | A |
1223450 | Van Allen | Apr 1917 | A |
1293627 | Bowers | Feb 1919 | A |
1585348 | Hick et al. | May 1926 | A |
1652910 | Psayla | Dec 1927 | A |
1714185 | Hugh | May 1929 | A |
1863591 | Crowell | Jun 1932 | A |
1914606 | Kinna et al. | Jun 1933 | A |
2036678 | White | Apr 1936 | A |
2107181 | Guyton | Feb 1938 | A |
2398671 | Saffir | Apr 1946 | A |
2418833 | Harris et al. | Apr 1947 | A |
2472492 | Saffir | Jun 1949 | A |
2602997 | Clawson | Jul 1952 | A |
2641835 | Greenmun | Jun 1953 | A |
2985961 | Schwartz | May 1961 | A |
2994957 | Mcleod | Aug 1961 | A |
3083459 | McMurry et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3241238 | Kersten | Mar 1966 | A |
3335495 | Theodore | Aug 1967 | A |
3458936 | Tuccillo et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3470614 | Kelly | Oct 1969 | A |
3518761 | Susman et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3644996 | Weinkle | Feb 1972 | A |
3667123 | Huey | Jun 1972 | A |
3702027 | Marshall et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3727309 | Huey | Apr 1973 | A |
3748739 | Thibert | Jul 1973 | A |
3813777 | VanHandel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3844702 | Dimmer et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3846911 | Wichner | Nov 1974 | A |
3908272 | Arnold | Sep 1975 | A |
3937773 | Huffman | Feb 1976 | A |
4029632 | Gross et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4227877 | Tureaud et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4247287 | Gigante | Feb 1981 | A |
4299573 | Ricci | Nov 1981 | A |
4398884 | Huffman | Aug 1983 | A |
4533325 | Blair | Aug 1985 | A |
4575340 | Lustig | Mar 1986 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4634377 | Behrend | Jan 1987 | A |
4784608 | Mays | Nov 1988 | A |
4931016 | Sillard | Jun 1990 | A |
2030102 | Lang | Jul 1991 | A |
5098296 | Cullen | Mar 1992 | A |
5151044 | Rotsaert | Sep 1992 | A |
5169309 | Staubli et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5188529 | Luth | Feb 1993 | A |
5234339 | Grigereit | Aug 1993 | A |
5427906 | Hansen | Jun 1995 | A |
5672305 | Kogure | Sep 1997 | A |
5711668 | Huestis | Jan 1998 | A |
5716214 | Lund | Feb 1998 | A |
5718584 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5775899 | Huffman | Jul 1998 | A |
5833461 | Wong | Nov 1998 | A |
5839900 | Billet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5885078 | Cagna et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5934906 | Phimmasone | Aug 1999 | A |
6030218 | Robinson | Feb 2000 | A |
6056547 | Names | May 2000 | A |
6116070 | Oshida | Sep 2000 | A |
6126445 | Willoughby | Oct 2000 | A |
6139322 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6149427 | Van Handel | Nov 2000 | A |
6224372 | Ibsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227851 | Chishti | May 2001 | B1 |
6257895 | Oestreich | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6384107 | Liu | May 2002 | B2 |
6422864 | Glatt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488503 | Lichkus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616444 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6788986 | Traber et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6814575 | Poirier | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6851949 | Sachdeva | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7021934 | Aravena | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153135 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7234940 | Weissman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7433810 | Pavloskaia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474932 | Geng | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7530810 | Clement | May 2009 | B2 |
7653455 | Cinader, Jr. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7704076 | Mullaly | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7758345 | Christensen | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7758346 | Letcher | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7806691 | Berger | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7854611 | Yau et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7901209 | Saliger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909607 | Yau et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7950924 | Brajnovic | May 2011 | B2 |
8043091 | Schmitt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8348669 | Schmitt | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8567408 | Roettger | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641938 | Howe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8801431 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875398 | Balshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9055993 | Grobbee et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9155599 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9213784 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9364302 | Thompson et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9402698 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9717572 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744010 | Grobbee | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020015934 | Rubbert et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020180760 | Rubbert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108845 | Giovannone | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138756 | Monkmeyer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030162147 | Dequeker | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163291 | Jordan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211444 | Andrews | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005530 | Mullaly | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029068 | Sachdeva et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040185422 | Orth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040219490 | Gartner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050175957 | Haje et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186539 | McLean | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050284489 | Ambis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040232 | Shoup | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040236 | Schmitt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060063135 | Mehl | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060210945 | Savic et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060286507 | Dequeker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070154868 | Scharlack et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070190492 | Schmitt | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070231774 | Massad | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080085489 | Schmitt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090207 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080127698 | Luckey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080206710 | Kruth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206714 | Schmitt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209974 | Ewolski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228303 | Schmitt | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300716 | Kopelman | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090081618 | Lamar | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090143609 | Araya | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148813 | Sun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162813 | Glor | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181346 | Orth | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090287332 | Adusumilli et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291407 | Kuo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325125 | Diangelo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015572 | Dierkes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062394 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086186 | Zug et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094446 | Baloch et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105011 | Karkar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100324875 | Kalili | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045442 | Adusimilli | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112804 | Chishti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129796 | Riggio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110236856 | Kanazawa et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244417 | Hilsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120058449 | Sklarski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094253 | Berger | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095732 | Fisker et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100500 | Gao | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120178045 | Massad | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179281 | Steingart et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120258426 | Boe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285019 | Schechner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329008 | Fishman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130101962 | Howe | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130108988 | Simoncic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130167380 | Balshi | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130209962 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216978 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218532 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221554 | Jung et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249132 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130280672 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130316302 | Fisker | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130337412 | Kwon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140045967 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140099600 | Harrison | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140272796 | Grobbee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010885 | Balshi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150037760 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150064653 | Grobbee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150134094 | Thompson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150230891 | Grobbee et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150245891 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150245892 | Grobbee | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160374778 | Grobbee | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170112599 | Balshi | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2505892 | May 2004 | CA |
1750797 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1062916 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1252867 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2915503 | Jul 2016 | EP |
2035133 | Dec 1970 | FR |
2008307281 | Dec 2008 | JP |
WO 2001032096 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 2003024352 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2004060197 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2009105661 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2009105700 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO 2010022479 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2012030493 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012041329 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012061652 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012061659 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012061660 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012064655 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2014130536 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO 2014159436 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2015063032 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European App EP14840991.5—EPO Search Report dated Apr. 19, 2017. |
PCT App PCTUS2014051008—International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
PCT App PCTUS201451008—Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 1, 2016. |
Positioning handle and occlusal locks for the Teeth-in-a-Day protocol:, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2016, Balshi et al., p. 274-278. |
“A New Protocol for Immediate Functional Loading of Dental Implants”, Dentistry Today, Balshi et al., Sep. 2001, vol. 20, No. 9. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,566—Restrictriction Requirement dated Apr. 16, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/343,566—Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 26, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295—Non-Final Official Action dated Dec. 19, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,036—Non-Final Official Action dated May 19, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,036—Final Official Action dated Nov. 6, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,036—Final Official Action dated Jun. 7, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/698,649—Non-Final Official Action dated Sep. 26, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295—Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/181,032—Non-Final Official Action dated Jul. 6, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/191,868—Non-Fial Official Action dated Jun. 16, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/390,330—Non-Final Official Action dated Jun. 1, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170231728 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15191868 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15390330 | US | |
Parent | 14495036 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 15191868 | US |