Various fluid flow systems are arranged to flow a process fluid from one or more input fluid sources toward a use device. For example, fluid flowing toward a heat exchanger surface can be used to transfer heat to or draw heat from the heat exchange surface and maintain the surface at an operating temperature.
In some examples, changes in the operating conditions of the fluid flow system, such as changes in the makeup of the fluid, operating temperatures of the fluid or the use device, or the like, can affect the likelihood of deposits forming from the process fluid onto system components. Deposits forming on the use device can negatively impact the performance of the device. For example, deposits forming on the heat exchange surface can act to insulate the heat exchange surface from the fluid, reducing the ability of the fluid to thermally interact with the heat exchanger.
Often, such deposits are detected only when the performance of the use device degrades to the point of requiring attention. For example, a heat exchanger surface can become unable to maintain desired temperatures due to a sufficiently large deposit forming on a heat exchange surface thereof. In order to restore the system to working order, the system often must be shut down, disassembled, and cleaned, which can be a costly and time-consuming process.
Certain aspects of the disclosure are generally directed to systems and methods for characterizing levels of deposits and/or detecting deposit conditions present in a fluid flow system. Some such systems can include one or more resistance temperature detectors (RTDs) in thermal communication with the fluid flowing through the fluid flow system. The RTD(s) can interface with a heating circuit configured to apply electrical power to the RTD(s), for example, to increase the temperature of the RTD(s). Additionally or alternatively, the RTD(s) can interface with a measurement circuit configured to provide an output representative of the temperature of one or more RTDs.
Systems can include a controller in communication with the heating circuit and the measurement circuit, and can be configured to operate the RTD(s) in a heating mode and a measurement mode. In some examples, the controller can be configured to heat the RTD(s) to an elevated temperature (e.g., in the heating mode), stop heating the RTD(s), and characterize the temperature change of the RTD(s) over time (e.g., in the measurement mode). The characterizing the temperature change of the RTD(s) can include characterizing the temperature change due to thermal conduction of heat from the RTD(s) to the fluid flowing through the flow system via the measurement circuit. Deposits from the fluid flow on the RTD(s) can impact the thermal conduction between the RTD and the fluid. Thus, in some embodiments, the controller can be configured to determine a level of deposit formed on the surface of the RTD(s) from the fluid based on the characterized temperature change.
In some examples, a controller can be configured to periodically switch the RTD(s) between the heating mode and the measurement mode and observe changes in the thermal behavior of the RTD(s). The controller can be configured to characterize a level of deposit from the fluid onto the RTD(s) based on the observed changes.
In some exemplary systems including a plurality of RTDs, the controller can be configured to maintain each of a plurality of RTDs at a different operating temperature and perform such processes on the RTDs. The controller can be configured to determine a temperature-dependent deposition profile based on the characterized levels of deposit of each of the RTDs and determine, based on the profile, if a deposit condition exists for the use device.
In various embodiments, observing changes in the behavior of an RTD can include a variety of observations. Exemplary observations can include changes in the temperature achieved by the RTD when a constant power is applied thereto, changes in the rate of temperature change of the RTD, amount of electrical power applied in the heating mode of operation to achieve a certain temperature, and the like. Each such characteristic can be affected by deposits forming on the RTD from the fluid, and can be used to characterize the level of deposit on the RTD.
In some examples, corrective actions can be taken to address detected deposits and/or deposit conditions. For example, changes to the fluid flowing through the system can be adjusted to minimize the formation of deposits. Such changes can include adding a chemical such as a scale inhibitor or a biocide to reduce deposit formation or stopping the flow of certain fluids into the system that may be contributing to deposit formation. Other corrective actions can include changing system parameters, such as fluid or use device operating temperatures. In some embodiments, such corrective actions can be performed manually by a system operator. Additionally or alternatively, such actions can be automated, for example, via the controller and other equipment, such as one or more pumps, valves, or the like. In still further examples, the system can be configured to perform a corrective action in the form of alerting a user of deposit conditions so that the user can take subsequent corrective actions.
A resistance temperature detector (RTD) is a device commonly used to measure the temperature of an object of interest. For example, in some instances, the resistance of the RTD is approximately linear with respect to temperature. The resistance can be measured by passing a current through the RTD and measuring the resulting voltage across the RTD. A current flowing through the RTD can have heating effects on the RTD, so the current is typically maintained at a relatively low magnitude during a temperature measurement. In exemplary operation, a small amount of current is passed through a conductor that is exposed to some environment where temperature is to be measured. As temperature changes, the characteristic change in resistance in that conductor (e.g., platinum) is measured and used to calculate the temperature.
In the example of
In some embodiments, a fluid flow system comprises one or more additional sensors 111 (shown in phantom) capable of determining one or more parameters of the fluid flowing through the system. In various embodiments, one or more additional sensors 111 can be configured to determine flow rate, temperature, pH, alkalinity, conductivity, and/or other fluid parameters, such as the concentration of one or more constituents of the process fluid. While shown as being a single element positioned downstream of the RTDs 102a-d, one or more additional sensors 111 can include any number of individual components, and may be positioned anywhere in the fluid flow system 100 while sampling the same fluid as RTDs 102a-d.
The system can include a controller 212 in communication with the measurement circuit 210. The controller 212 can include a microcontroller, a processor, memory comprising operating/execution instructions, a field programmable gate array (FPGA), and/or any other device capable of interfacing and interacting with system components. In some such examples, the system can operate in a measurement mode in which the controller 212 can interface with the measurement circuit 210 for determining a temperature of the RTD 202. In some examples, the controller can cause a current to be applied to the RTD via the measurement circuit 210, receive a signal from the measurement circuit 210 representative of the voltage across the RTD 202, and determine the resistance of the RTD based on the known current and measured voltage. In some embodiments, the controller 212 is configured to otherwise determine the resistance and/or the temperature of the RTD 202 based on the signal received from the measurement circuit. Thus, in some such examples, the controller 212 can interface with the measurement circuit 210 and the RTD 202 to determine the temperature of the RTD 202.
The system of
In some examples, the controller 212 is capable of interfacing with the RTD 202 via the heating circuit 214 and the measurement circuit 210 simultaneously. In some such examples, the system can simultaneously operate in heating mode and measurement mode. Similarly, such systems can operate in the heating mode and in the measurement mode independently, wherein the RTD may be operated in the heating mode, the measurement mode, or both simultaneously. In other examples, the controller 212 can switch between a heating mode and a measurement mode of operation. Additionally or alternatively, a controller in communication with a plurality of RTDs 202 via one or more measurement circuits 210 and one or more heating circuits 214 can operate such RTDs in different modes of operation. In various such examples, the controller 212 can operate each RTD in the same mode of operation or separate modes of operation, and/or may operate each RTD individually, for example, in a sequence. Many implementations are possible and within the scope of the present disclosure.
As described with respect to
In an exemplary heating operation embodiment, the controller signals the PWM module 316 to elevate the temperature of an RTD 302a. The controller 312 can cause the PWM module 316 to output a PWM signal from channel A to the amplification stage 318. Aspects of the PWM signal, such as the duty cycle, magnitude, etc. can be adjusted by the controller 312 to meet desired heating effects. Additionally or alternatively, the amplification stage 318 can adjust one or more aspects of channel A of the PWM signal to effectively control the amount of heating of the RTD 302a. Similar heating operations can be performed for any or all of RTDs 302a-d simultaneously. In some embodiments, the controller 312 can control heating operation of each of a plurality of RTDs 302a-d such that each of the RTDs is elevated to a different operating temperature.
As described elsewhere herein, the controller 312 can be capable of interfacing with one or more RTDs 302a-d via a measurement circuit 310. In some such examples, the controller 312 can determine, via the measurement circuit 310, a measurement of the temperature of the RTD 302a-d. Since the resistance of an RTD is dependent on the temperature thereof, in some examples, the controller 312 can be configured to determine the resistance of the RTD 302a-d and determine the temperature therefrom. In the illustrated embodiment, the measurement circuit 310 comprises a current source 330 (e.g., a precision current source) capable of providing a desired current through one or more of the RTDs 302a-d to ground 340. In such an embodiment, a measurement of the voltage across the RTD 302a-d can be combined with the known precision current flowing therethrough to calculate the resistance, and thus the temperature, of the RTD 302a-d. In some examples, the current provided to the RTDs from the current source 330 is sufficiently small (e.g., in the microamp range) so that the current flowing through the RTD does not substantially change the temperature of the RTD.
In configurations including a plurality of RTDs 302a-d, the controller 312 can interface with each of the RTDs 302a-d in a variety of ways. In the exemplary embodiment of
In order to measure the voltage drop across a desired one of the plurality of RTDs 302a-d, the measurement circuit 310 includes a demultiplexer 322 having channels A, B, C, and D corresponding to RTDs 302a, 302b, 302c, and 302d, respectively. The controller 312 can direct the demultiplexer 322 to transmit a signal from any one of respective channels A-D depending on the desired RTD. The output of the demultiplexer 322 can be directed to the controller 312 for receiving the signal indicative of the resistance, and therefore the temperature, of a desired RTD. For example, in some embodiments, the output of the demultiplexer 322 does not connect or otherwise has high impedance to ground. Accordingly, current flowing to an RTD (e.g., 302a) via a respective multiplexer 320 channel (e.g., channel A) will only flow through the RTD. The resulting voltage across the RTD (e.g., 302a) will similarly be present at the respective input channel (e.g., channel A) of the demultiplexer 322, and can be output therefrom for receiving by the controller 312. In some examples, instead of being directly applied to controller 312, the voltage across the RTD (e.g., 302a) at the output of the demultiplexer 322 can be applied to a first input of a differential amplifier 334 for measuring the voltage. The amplifier 334 can be used, for example, to compare the voltage at the output of the demultiplexer 322 to a reference voltage before outputting the resulting amplification to the controller 312. Thus, as described herein, a signal output from the demultiplexer 322 for receiving by the controller 312 can, but need not be received directly by the controller 312. Rather, in some embodiments, the controller 312 can receive a signal based on the signal at the output of the demultiplexer 322, such as an output signal from the amplifier 334 based on the output signal from the demultiplexer 322.
In some examples, the measurement circuit 310 can include a reference resistor 308 in line between a second current source 332 and ground 340. The current source 332 can provide a constant a known current through the reference resistor 308 of a known resistance to ground, causing a constant voltage drop across the reference resistor 308. The constant voltage can be calculated based on the known current from the current source 332 and the known resistance of the reference resistor 308. In some examples, the reference resistor 308 is located in a sensor head proximate RTDs 302a-d and is wired similarly to RTDs 302a-d. In some such embodiments, any unknown voltage drop due to unknown resistance of wires is for the reference resistor 308 and any RTD 302a-d is approximately equal. In the illustrated example, reference resistor 308 is coupled on one side to ground 340 and on the other side to a second input of the differential amplifier 334. Thus, the current source 332 in combination with the reference resistor 308 can act to provide a known and constant voltage to the second input of the differential amplifier 334 (e.g., due to the reference resistor 308, plus the variable voltage due to the wiring). Thus, in some such examples, the output of differential amplifier 334 is unaffected by wiring resistance, and can be fed to the controller 312.
As shown in the illustrated embodiment and described herein, the differential amplifier 334 can receive the voltage across the RTD (e.g., 302a) from the output of the demultiplexer 322 at one input and the reference voltage across the reference resistor 308 at its other input. Accordingly, the output of the differential amplifier 334 is indicative of the voltage difference between the voltage drop across the RTD and the known voltage drop across the reference resistor 308. The output of the differential amplifier 334 can be received by the controller 312 for ultimately determining the temperature of the RTD (e.g., 302a). It will be appreciated that, while an exemplary measurement circuit is shown in
In some embodiments, the controller 312 can operate the multiplexer 320 and the demultiplexer 322 in concert so that it is known which of the RTDs is being analyzed. For instance, with respect to the illustrative example of
In an exemplary configuration such as shown in
As described elsewhere herein, in some examples, the controller 312 can control heating operation of one or more RTDs. In some such embodiments, the controller 312 stops heating an RTD prior to measuring the temperature of the RTD via the multiplexer 320 and demultiplexer 322. Similarly, when heating an RTD via the heating circuit 314, the controller 312 can turn off the channel(s) associated with that RTD in the multiplexer 320 and demultiplexer 322. In some embodiments, for each individual RTD, the controller 312 can use the heating circuit 314 and the measurement circuit 310 (including the multiplexer 320 and demultiplexer 322) to switch between distinct heating and measurement modes of operation.
Referring back to
Accordingly, in some examples, observing the thermal behavior of one or more RTDs in the fluid flow path can provide information regarding the level of deposit present at the RTDs (e.g., 102a-d).
With reference to
In an exemplary embodiment, the temperature decay profile over time can be fit to a double exponential function. For example, in some instances, a first portion of the double exponential decay model can represent temperature change due to the process fluid flowing through the flow system. A second portion of the double exponential decay model can represent temperature conductivity from a heated RTD to other components, such as wires, a sample holder (e.g., 104 in
In some cases, using certain fitting functions in characterizing the deposit can be skewed if the RTD is allowed to reach equilibrium with the process fluid, after which it stops changing in temperature. Accordingly, in various embodiments, the controller 212 is configured to resume heating the RTD prior to the RTD reaching thermal equilibrium and/or to stop associating collected temperature data with the thermal decay profile of the RTD prior to the RTD reaching equilibrium with the process fluid. Doing so prevents non-decay data from undesirably altering the analysis of the thermal decay profile of the RTD. In other embodiments, the fitting function can account for equilibration of the RTD temperature and the process fluid temperature without skewing the fitting function. In some such embodiment, the type of fitting function and/or weighting factors in the fitting function can be used to account for such temperature equilibration.
In some embodiments, the difference in decay profiles between clean and fouled RTDs can be used to determine the level of deposit on the fouled RTD. The decay profile of the clean RTD can be recalled from memory or determined from an RTD known to be free from deposit. In some instances, a fitting parameter such as a time constant can be temperature-independent. Thus, in some such embodiments, it is not necessary that the clean and fouled RTD are elevated to the same temperature for comparing aspects of their thermal decay profiles.
Similar to
In some embodiments, rather than observing properties regarding RTD temperature change, an RTD can be raised to a fixed operating temperature.
With reference to
In some examples, the amount of power required to maintain the RTD at a fixed temperature is compared to the power required to maintain a clean RTD at the fixed temperature. The comparison can be used to determine the level of deposit on the RTD. Additionally or alternatively, the profile of the required power to maintain the RTD at the fixed temperature over time can be used to determine the level of deposit on the RTD. For instance, the rate of change in the power required to maintain the RTD at the fixed temperature can be indicative of the rate of deposition of the deposit, which can be used to determine the level of a deposit after a certain amount of time.
In another embodiment, an RTD can be operated in the heating mode by applying a constant amount of power to the RTD via the heating circuit and observing the resulting temperature of the RTD. For instance, during exemplary operation, the controller can provide a constant power to an RTD via the heating circuit and periodically measure the temperature of the RTD via the measurement circuit. The switching from the heating mode (applying constant power) to the measurement mode (to measure the temperature) and back to the heating mode (applying constant power) can be performed rapidly so that the temperature of the RTD does not significantly change during the temperature measurement.
In some embodiments, the difference in temperature between a clean RTD and an RTD under test when a constant power is applied to each can be used to determine the level of deposit on the RTD under test. Additionally or alternatively, the rate of temperature increase based on a constant applied power can provide information regarding the rate of deposition of a deposit on an RTD, which can be used to determine a level of deposit on the RTD.
With reference to
In various embodiments, a controller can be configured to interface with a heating circuit and a measurement circuit in order to perform one or more of such processes to observe or detect any deposition from a process fluid onto an RTD. In an exemplary implementation with reference to
In some examples, the use device becomes less functional when deposits are present. For instance, in a heat exchanger system wherein the use device comprises a heat exchange surface, deposits formed on the heat exchange surface can negatively impact the ability for the heat exchange surface to transfer heat. Accordingly, sufficient depots detected at the RTD can alert a system operator of likely deposits at the heat exchange surface, and corrective action can be taken (e.g., cleaning the heat exchange surface). However, even if the RTD simulating the use device allows a system operator to detect the presence of a deposit at the use device, addressing the detected deposit (e.g., cleaning, etc.) can require costly system downtime and maintenance since the deposition has already occurred. Additionally or alternatively, in some instances, various deposits may not clean well even if removed for a cleaning process, possibly rendering the use device less effective.
Accordingly, in some embodiments, a plurality of RTDs (e.g., 102a-d) can be disposed in a single fluid flow path (e.g., 106) and used to characterize the status of the process fluid and/or the fluid flow system (e.g., 100). With reference to
For example, with reference to
During operation, after maintaining the RTDs 302a-d at their respective characterization temperatures, the controller 312 can be configured to perform a deposit characterization process such as those described above with respect to any of
For example, such switching can include switching to a measurement mode for a period of time to observe the temperature decay of the RTD (e.g., as in
In still another example, periodically switching between the heating mode and the measurement mode can include heating the RTD to maintain the RTD at a constant temperature while periodically switching to the measurement mode to confirm the constant temperature is maintained (e.g., as illustrated in
As discussed elsewhere herein, observing such changes in the thermal behavior of an RTD can be indicative of, and used to determine, a level of deposit on the RTD. Thus, in some examples, the controller 312 can perform any of such processes on the plurality of RTDs 302a-d that have been elevated to different temperatures to characterize the level of deposit on each of the RTDs 302a-d. In some such examples, the controller 312 characterizes the deposit level at each of the RTDs 302a-d individually via corresponding channels A-D in the multiplexer 320 and demultiplexer 322.
The controller 312 can be configured to associate the level of deposit of each RTD with its corresponding characterization temperature. That is, the controller 312 can determine a level of deposit at each of the RTDs 302a-d and associate the level of deposit with the initial characterization temperature of each of the respective RTDs 302a-d. The associated deposit levels and operating temperatures can be used to characterize a temperature dependence of deposition on surfaces in the fluid flow system. If the typical operating temperature of the use device (e.g., a heat exchanger surface) is lower than the characterization temperatures of the RTDs 302a-d, and deposits are driven by increased temperature, the use device will tend to have less deposit than the RTDs 302a-d. Moreover, the temperature dependence of deposition characterized by the RTD operation can be used to infer the likelihood of deposits forming on the use device.
Additionally or alternatively, periodically observing the depositions on the various RTDs operating at different characterization temperatures can provide information regarding general increases or decreases in the occurrence of depositions. Such changes in deposition characteristics of the process fluid can be due to a variety of factors affecting the fluid flow system, such as a change in the temperature or concentration of constituents in the process fluid.
In an exemplary operation, an increase in deposition and/or deposition rate detected from the characterization RTDs can be indicative of a deposit condition for the use device, in which deposits forming on the use device during normal operation become more likely. The detection of a deposit condition can initiate subsequent analysis to determine the cause of increased deposition, such as measuring one or more parameters of the process fluid. In some instances, this can be performed automatically, for example, by the controller.
Additionally or alternatively, one or more parameters of the process fluid can be adjusted to reduce the deposits deposited from the process fluid into the fluid flow system and/or to eliminate the deposits that have already accumulated. For instance, a detected increase in deposition can cause an acid or other cleaning chemical to be released to attempt to remove the deposit. Similarly, in some examples, a chemical such as an acid, a scale inhibitor chemical, a scale dispersant, a biocide (e.g., bleach), or the like can be added to the process fluid to reduce the likelihood of further deposition.
In some examples, an increase in deposition (e.g., scale) over time can be due to the absence of or reduction in a typical process fluid constituent (e.g., a scale inhibitor and/or a scale dispersant), for example, due to equipment malfunction or depletion of a chemical. Reintroducing the constituent into the process fluid can act to reduce the amount of deposition from the process fluid into the fluid flow system. Additionally or alternatively, various fluid properties that can impact the likelihood of deposit formation can be measured via one or more sensors (e.g., 111) in the fluid flow system, such as fluid operating temperature, pH, alkalinity, and the like. Adjusting such factors can help to reduce the amount and/or likelihood of deposition.
In various embodiments, any number of steps can be taken in response to address an increase in detected deposition or other observed deposition trends. In some embodiments, the controller is configured to alert a user of changes or trends in deposits. For example, in various embodiments, the controller can alert a user if deposit rates, levels, and/or changes therein meet a certain criteria. In some such examples, criteria can be temperature dependent (e.g., a deposit level or rate occurring at an RTD with a certain characterization temperature) or temperature independent. Additionally or alternatively, the controller can alert a user if determined properties of the process fluid satisfy certain criteria, such as too low or too high of a concentration of a fluid constituent (e.g., that increase or decrease likelihood of deposits) and/or various fluid properties that may impact the amount and/or likelihood of deposition.
In some such examples, alerting the user is performed when the system is potentially trending toward an environment in which deposits may being to form on the use device so that corrective and/or preventative action can be taken before significant deposits form on the use device. In some examples, an alert to a user can include additional information, such as information regarding properties of the process fluid flowing through the system, to better help the user take appropriate action. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, the controller can be configured to interface with other equipment (e.g., pumps, valves, etc.) in order to perform such action automatically.
In some systems, certain deposits become more likely as the deposit surface temperature increases. Thus, in some embodiments, RTDs (e.g., 302a-d) can be heated to temperatures above the typical operating temperatures of a use device in order to intentionally induce and monitor deposits from the process fluid can help to determine situations in which the use device is at risk for undesired deposits. In some such embodiments, observing deposition characteristics on one or more RTDs that are operating at a temperature higher than a typical temperature of the use device can be used to determine deposition trends or events at certain surface temperature while minimizing the risk of actual deposition on the use device. In some instances, elevating different RTDs to different temperature provides the controller with information regarding the temperature dependence of deposit formation in the fluid flow system, and can be further used to characterize deposit formation in the fluid flow system.
After repeated or prolonged characterization in which the RTDs are heated to induce deposits, the RTDs may eventually become too coated for effective characterization. In some such embodiments, the plurality of RTDs (e.g., 102a-d) can be removed from the system and cleaned or replaced without disrupting operation of the system or use device. For example, with reference to
In some examples, the likelihood of deposits forming within a fluid flow system can be considered a deposit potential of the system. In various embodiments, the deposit potential can be a function of surface temperature of an object within the fluid flow system. In other examples, the deposit potential may be associated with a particular use device within the system. In some systems, the deposit potential can be used as a metric for observing the absolute likelihood of deposits forming within the system. Additionally or alternatively, the deposit potential can be used as a metric for observing change in the deposit conditions within the fluid flow system. In some such examples, the absolute deposit potential need not necessarily correspond to a deposit condition, but changes in the deposit potential may be indicative of increased likelihood of a deposit condition, for example.
The method further includes periodically switching the RTD(s) from the heating mode to a measurement mode to measure the temperature of the RTD(s) (764) and observing changes in the thermal behavior of the RTD(s) (766). This can include, for example, processes as described with respect to
In addition to a deposit thickness, additional characterization of the levels of deposit can include determining a likely deposited material in the system. Comparing the thermal decay profiles for heated and unheated or only slightly heated RTDs, the nature of the deposit can be determined. For example, in some cases, sedimentation and/or biofilm (e.g., microbial growth) deposits are generally unaffected by the surface temperature, while scaling effects will be enhanced at higher temperatures. Thus, the characterization temperature dependence of the thermal decay profiles can be used to characterize the type of deposits present at the RTDs and within the fluid flow system.
The method can further include determining if a deposit condition exists at the use device. This can include, for example, monitoring the deposition levels and/or rates at the plurality of RTD(s) over time to observe deposition trends. In some examples, certain rates of deposition or increases in rates of deposition can indicate a deposit condition in which deposits forming on the use device become more likely. In some such examples, levels of deposit, rates of deposit, and/or changes therein at an RTD can be analyzed in combination with its associated characterization temperature to determine if a deposit condition exists. Additionally or alternatively, analyzing the relationship of such data (e.g., levels of deposit, rates of deposit, and/or changes therein) with respect to temperature (e.g., at RTD(s) having difference characterization temperatures) can be used to detect a deposit condition.
In some examples, monitored deposit levels, deposit rates, and/or other data such as fluid properties (e.g., temperature, constituent concentrations, pH, etc.) can be used to determine a deposit potential of the process fluid on to the use device. In various embodiments, the deposit potential meeting a predetermined threshold and/or changing by a predetermined amount can be used to detect the presence of a deposit condition.
In the event of a deposit condition, the method can include taking corrective action to address the deposit condition (772). The corrective action can include a variety of actions, such as introducing or changing the dose of one or more chemicals in the process fluid, changing the temperature of the process fluid, alerting a user, adjusting the use device for the process fluid (e.g., a heat load on a heat exchanger), increasing a rate of blowdown, and/or other actions that can affect the deposition characteristics of the process fluid. In an exemplary embodiment, deposition characterization can include determining the likely deposited material, such as scale, biofilm, or the like.
In some such embodiments, the corrective action (e.g., 772) can be specifically taken to address the determined deposit material. For instance, a scale inhibitor can be added or increased due to a detected scaling event. However, if the deposition characterization is representative of a biofilm rather than scale, a biocide can be added or increased. Such corrective actions can be performed automatically by the system. Additionally or alternatively, the system can signal to a user to take corrective action to address the deposit condition.
In some embodiments in which the fluid flow system can receive fluid from a plurality of fluid sources (e.g., selectable input sources), the corrective action can include changing the source of fluid input into the system. For instance, in an exemplary embodiment, a fluid flow system can selectively receive an input fluid from a fresh water source and from an effluent stream from another process. The system can initially operate by receiving process fluid from the effluent stream. However, in the event of a detected or potential deposit condition, the source of fluid can be switched to the fresh water source to reduce the possible deposit materials present in the process fluid. Switching the source of fluid can include completely ceasing the flow of fluid from one source and starting the flow of fluid from a different source. Additionally or alternatively, switching sources can include a mixture of the original source (e.g., the effluent stream) and the new source(s) (e.g., the fresh water). For example, in some embodiments, a desired blend of fluid from different input sources (e.g., 50% from one source and 50% from another source) can be selected.
In a similar implementation, in some embodiments, the corrective action can include temporarily stopping flow from a single source (e.g., an effluent source) and providing a process fluid from a different source (e.g., fresh water). The new source of fluid can be used temporarily to flush potential deposit materials from the system before excessive deposit can occur. In some examples, once such materials have been flushed from the system (e.g., via fresh water), the source of the process fluid can be switched back to the original source (e.g., the effluent stream). In some examples, flushing the fluid from the system can be done while operating the use device in the system. In other examples, when certain deposit conditions and/or likelihoods are detected (e.g., a certain deposit potential is reached), flow to the use device can be stopped and the fluid in the system can be directed to a drain to rid the system of such fluid. The system can then direct fluid back to the use device from either fluid source or a combination thereof.
In still another implementation, as described elsewhere herein, a default input fluid can be the combined flow of fluid from each of a plurality of available sources. In the event of detected deposit conditions, one or more of the fluid sources can be closed off from the system (e.g., via a shutoff valve). In some examples, systems can include one or more auxiliary sensors configured to monitor one or more parameters of the fluid flowing into the system from each input source, such as a conductivity sensor, concentration sensor, turbidity sensor, or the like. Data from such auxiliary sensors can be used to determine which of the input sources is/are contributing to the deposit condition. Such fluid sources can then be prevented from contributing to the fluid flowing through the system.
Blocking, switching between, and/or combining process fluid input sources can be performed, for example, via one or more valves arranged between the source(s) and the fluid flow system. In various embodiments, the valves can be manually and/or automatically controlled to adjust the source(s) of the input fluid. For example, in some embodiments, a detected deposit condition can cause a controller in communication with one or more such valves to actuate such valves to adjust the source of fluid flowing into the system. Alternatively, the controller can indicate to the user that corrective action should be performed, and the user can actuate such valves to adjust the source of fluid to the system.
As described elsewhere herein, one or more fluid input sources can include one or more RTDs disposed therein. Such RTD(s) can be used to characterize deposit conditions for each of the plurality of fluid sources individually. Accordingly, if one fluid source is exhibiting a deposit condition, one or more corrective actions can include performing an action to affect the fluid flowing into the system from that source (e.g., adjusting a parameter of the fluid) and/or blocking the fluid from flowing into the system (e.g., via a valve). In some examples, each input fluid source includes one or more such RTDs so that each source can be characterized individually. In some such embodiments, one or more RTDs can additionally be positioned in the fluid flow path after fluid from each of the fluid sources are combined so that the composite fluid can also be characterized separately from each of the individual sources.
In general, taking one or more corrective actions (e.g., step 772) can act to reduce the rate of deposition at the use device. Thus, in some such embodiments, the corrective action acts as a preventative action for preventing undesirable deposits from forming on the use device. This can prolong the operability of the use device while minimizing or eliminating the need to shut down the system in order to clean deposits from the use device.
In some embodiments the taken and/or suggested corrective action can be based on data received from one or more additional sensors (e.g., 111). For instance, in some embodiments, reduction in a scale inhibitor (e.g., detected via a scale inhibitor introduction flow rate meter and/or a scale inhibitor concentration meter) contributes to a deposit condition in the system. Thus, the corrective action can include replenishing a supply of scale inhibitor. Similarly, in some examples, the presence of excess deposit material (e.g., calcium detected by a concentration meter) contributes to a deposit condition. Corresponding corrective action can include introducing or increasing the amount of a scale inhibitor into the system. Additionally or alternatively, a corrective action can include changing phosphate levels in the fluid. For example, phosphate deposits accumulating in the system can result in reducing the flow of a phosphorus-containing chemical or phosphate deposition catalyst. In other examples, the addition of phosphate-containing fluids may inhibit other deposits from forming. In some such examples, such phosphate- or phosphorus-containing fluids can be added or increased.
Appropriate corrective actions can be determined, in some embodiments, based on the characterized levels of deposits (e.g., at step 768). For example, greater deposition rates and/or deposit potentials can result in greater amounts of scale inhibitor to be released into the system to prevent deposits from forming. Additionally or alternatively, characterizations in the type of deposits forming (e.g., by comparing thermal decay profiles at different temperatures) can influence which corrective actions are taken. For example, if characterization of the deposit levels indicates that the deposits are generally sedimentation rather than scaling, releasing scale inhibitor chemicals may not be a useful action, and other, more appropriate action may be taken.
Various embodiments have been described. Such examples are non-limiting, and do not define or limit the scope of the invention in any way. Rather, these and other examples are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/262,807 filed Sep. 12, 2016, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3321696 | Zenmon et al. | May 1967 | A |
3724267 | Zoschak | Apr 1973 | A |
4138878 | Holmes et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4346587 | Brindak | Aug 1982 | A |
4383438 | Eaton | May 1983 | A |
4514096 | Wynnyckyj et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4570881 | Lustenberger | Feb 1986 | A |
4671072 | Starck et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4718774 | Slough | Jan 1988 | A |
4722610 | Levert et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4832715 | Naruse | May 1989 | A |
4967593 | McQueen | Nov 1990 | A |
5248198 | Droege | Sep 1993 | A |
5360549 | Mouche et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5590706 | Tsou et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5661233 | Spates et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5827952 | Mansure et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5992505 | Moon | Nov 1999 | A |
6053032 | Kraus et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062069 | Panchal et al. | May 2000 | A |
6250140 | Kouznetsov et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6328467 | Keyhani | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6386272 | Starner et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6432168 | Schnauer | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6499876 | Baginksi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6666905 | Page et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6789938 | Sandu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6886393 | Romanet et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6960018 | Sandu et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7077563 | Xiao et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082825 | Aoshima et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7581874 | Hays et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594430 | Beardwood et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8109161 | Jovancicevic et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8147130 | Sakami et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8274655 | Herzog | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8360635 | Huang et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8517600 | Wan et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8672537 | Veau et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8746968 | Auret et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9151204 | Hashida et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9176044 | Bosbach et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9207002 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9289525 | Mansor et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9506883 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9568375 | Bliss | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9939395 | Wolferseder | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010013220 | Schonauer | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010035044 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051108 | Schonauer | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020111282 | Charaf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030062063 | Sandu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040052963 | Ivanov et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040139799 | Sudolcan et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144403 | Sandu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20070025413 | Hays et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070080075 | Wang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080190173 | Wienand et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080264464 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291965 | Wolferseder | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090000764 | Tochon et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090094963 | Mizoguchi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090260987 | Valdes et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100084269 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100272993 | Volinsky et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110283773 | Suzuki | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283780 | Bosbach et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286492 | Auret et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310927 | Bombardieri et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130031973 | Kirst et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130144503 | Nishijima et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130232956 | Loman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130256296 | Hocken et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140177673 | Bliss | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140346041 | Nishijima | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150023393 | Britton et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150268078 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150308875 | Muller et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150355076 | Eaton et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160017780 | Kinugawa et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160017830 | Wienand et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160061691 | Stojicevic et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170052133 | Opdahl | Feb 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202013330 | Oct 2011 | CN |
104995501 | Oct 2015 | CN |
2788600 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2000043762 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0204290 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2009135504 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010087724 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2013141438 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Awad “Influence of Surface Temperature on Surface Fouling—Theoretical Approach,” Life Science Journal, vol. 9, No. 3, 2012, pp. 1733-1741. |
International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/051108, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 2, 2018, 15 pages. |
“Introduction to the DATS Fouling Monitor Technology,” Bridger Scientific Inc., 2011, 10 pages. |
Sincic et al., “Novel Fouling Measurement Device,” Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, vol. 28, No. 4, 2014, pp. 465-472. |
“Tomographic Applications for Oil & Gas Industry,” Rocsole Ltd, 2014, 53 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190234893 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15262807 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 16383576 | US |