Deposition of LiCoO2

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8636876
  • Patent Number
    8,636,876
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 7, 2005
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 28, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
In accordance with the present invention, deposition of LiCoO2 layers in a pulsed-dc physical vapor deposition process is presented. Such a deposition can provide a low-temperature, high deposition rate deposition of a crystalline layer of LiCoO2 with a desired <101> or <003> orientation. Some embodiments of the deposition address the need for high rate deposition of LiCoO2 films, which can be utilized as the cathode layer in a solid state rechargeable Li battery. Embodiments of the process according to the present invention can eliminate the high temperature (>700° C.) anneal step that is conventionally needed to crystallize the LiCoO2 layer.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention is related to thin-film solid-state batteries and, in particular, the deposition of LiCoO2 films and layers for battery manufacture.


2. Discussion of Related Art


Solid-state thin-film batteries are typically formed by stacking thin films on a substrate in such a way that the films cooperate to generate a voltage. The thin films typically include current collectors, a cathode, an anode, and an electrolyte. The thin films can be deposited utilizing a number of deposition processes, including sputtering and electroplating. Substrates suitable for this application have conventionally been high temperature materials capable of withstanding at least one high temperature anneal process to at least 700° C. for up to about 2 hours in air so as to crystallize the LiCoO2 film. Such a substrate can be any suitable material with appropriate structural and material properties, for example a semiconductor wafer, metallic sheet (e.g., titanium or zirconium), ceramic such as alumina, or other material capable of withstanding subsequent high temperature processing in the presence of the LiCoO2, which can experience significant interfacial reactions with most materials utilized in a battery during these temperature cycles.


Other lithium containing mixed metal oxides besides LiCoO2, including Ni, Nb, Mn, V, and sometimes also Co, but including other transition metal oxides, have been evaluated as crystalline energy storage cathode materials. Typically, the cathode material is deposited in amorphous form and then the material is heated in an anneal process to form the crystalline material. In LiCoO2, for example, an anneal at or above 700° C. transforms the deposited amorphous film to a crystalline form. Such a high temperature anneal, however, severely limits the materials that can be utilized as the substrate, induces destructive reaction with the lithium containing cathode material and often requires the use of expensive noble metals such as gold. Such high thermal budget processes (i.e., high temperatures for extended periods of time) are incompatible with semiconductor or MEM device processing and limit the choice of substrate materials, increase the cost, and decrease the yield of such batteries.


It is known that crystallization of amorphous LiCoO2 on precious metals can be achieved. An example of this crystallization is discussed in Kim et al., where a conventional furnace anneal at 700° C. for 20 minutes of an amorphous layer of LiCoO2 on a precious metal achieves crystallization of the LiCoO2 material, as shown by x-ray diffraction data. Kim, Han-Ki and Yoon, Young Soo, “Characteristics of rapid-thermal-annealed LiCoO2, cathode film for an all-solid-state thin film microbattery,” J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A 22(4), July/August 2004. In Kim et al., the LiCoO2 film was deposited on a platinum film that was deposited on a high-temperature MgO/Si substrate. In Kim et al, it was shown that such a crystalline film is capable of constituting the Li+ ion containing cathode layer of a functional all solid-state Li+ ion battery.


There are many references that disclose an ion beam assisted process that can provide a LiCoO2 film that demonstrates some observable crystalline composition by low angle x-ray diffraction (XRD). Some examples of these are found in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/815,983 (Publication No. US 2002/001747), 09/815,621 (Publication No. US 2001/0032666), and 09/815,919 (Publication No. US 2002/0001746). These references disclose the use of a second front side ion beam or other ion source side-by-side with a deposition source so as to obtain a region of overlap of the flux of ions with the flux of LiCoO2 vapor at the substrate surface. None of these references disclose film temperature data or other temperature data of the film during deposition to support an assertion of low temperature processing.


It is very difficult to form a uniform deposition either by sputtering a material layer or by bombardment with an ion flux. Utilization of two uniform simultaneous distributions from two sources that do not occupy the same position and extent with respect to the substrate enormously increases the difficulties involved in achieving a uniform material deposition. These references do not disclose a uniform materials deposition, which is required for reliable production of thin-film batteries. A well understood specification for material uniformity for useful battery products is that a 5% one-sigma material uniformity is standard in thin film manufacturing. About 86% of the films with this uniformity will be found acceptable for battery production.


It is even more difficult to scale a substrate to manufacturing scale, such as 200 mm or 300 mm. Indeed, in the references discussed above that utilize both a sputtering deposition and an ion beam deposition, only small area targets and small area substrates are disclosed. These references disclose a single feasibility result. No method for achieving a uniform distribution from two separate front side sources has been disclosed in these references.


Further, conventional materials and production processes can limit the energy density capacity of the batteries produced, causing a need for more batteries occupying more volume. It is specifically desirable to produce batteries that have large amounts of stored energy per unit volume in order to provide batteries of low weight and low volume.


Therefore, there is a need for a low temperature process for depositing crystalline material, for example LiCoO2 material, onto a substrate. In particular, there is a need for processes that allow production of cathodic lithium films for a battery structure with a low enough thermal budget to allow production of functional structures on low temperature materials such as stainless steel, aluminum, or copper foil.


SUMMARY

In accordance with the present invention, deposition of LiCoO2 layers in a pulsed-dc physical vapor deposition process is presented. Such a deposition can provide a low-temperature, high deposition rate deposition of a crystalline layer of LiCoO2 with a desired <101> orientation. Some embodiments of the deposition address the need for high rate deposition of LiCoO2 films, which can be utilized as the cathode layer in a solid state rechargeable Li battery. Embodiments of the process according to the present invention can eliminate the high temperature (>700° C.) anneal step that is conventionally needed to crystallize the LiCoO2 layer.


A method of depositing a LiCoO2 layer according to some embodiments of the present invention includes placing a substrate in a reactor; flowing a gaseous mixture including argon and oxygen through the reactor; and applying pulsed-DC power to a target formed of LiCoO2 positioned opposite the substrate. In some embodiments, a LiCoO2 layer is formed on the substrate. Further, in some embodiments the LiCoO2 layer is a crystalline layer of orientation <101>.


In some embodiments, a stacked battery structure can be formed. The stacked battery structure includes one or more battery stacks deposited on a thin substrate, wherein each battery stack includes: a conducting layer, a crystalline LiCoO2 layer deposited over the conducting layer, a LiPON layer deposited over the LiCoO2 layer; and an anode deposited over the LiPON layer. A top conducting layer can be deposited over the one or more battery stacks.


In some embodiments, a battery structure can be formed in a cluster tool. A method of producing a battery in a cluster tool includes loading a substrate into a cluster tool; depositing a conducting layer over the substrate in a first chamber of the cluster tool; depositing a crystalline LiCoO2 layer over the conducting layer in a second chamber of the cluster tool; depositing a LiPON layer over the LiCoO2 layer in a third chamber of the cluster tool; depositing an anode layer over the LiCoO2 layer in a fourth chamber; and depositing a second conducting layer over the LiPON layer in a fifth chamber of the cluster tool.


A fixture for holding a thin substrate can include a top portion and a bottom portion, wherein the thin substrate is held when the top portion is attached to the bottom portion.


These and other embodiments of the invention are further discussed below with reference to the following figures. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed. Further, specific explanations or theories regarding the deposition or performance of certain layers during deposition processes or in the performance of devices incorporating those layers are presented for explanation only and are not to be considered limiting with respect to the scope of the present disclosure or the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate a pulsed-DC biased reactive deposition apparatus that can be utilized in the methods of depositing according to the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows an example of a target that can be utilized in the reactor illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B.



FIG. 3 illustrates a thin-film battery design according to some embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 4A and 4B show an x-ray diffraction analysis of and an SEM photograph of a LiCoO2 film deposited according to embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 5A through 5E show SEM photographs of LiCoO2 films according to some embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 6A illustrates a layer of LiCoO2 deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention on a thin substrate.



FIG. 6B illustrates a layer of LiCoO2 deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention over a conducting layer on a thin substrate.



FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D illustrate a thin substrate mount and mask arrangement that can be utilized in the deposition of LiCoO2 layers deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates a cluster tool that can be utilized to form batteries with LiCoO2 layers deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate examples of stacked batter structures with LiCoO2 layers deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 10A through 10D illustrate deposition and anneal steps for LiCoO2 deposited over an iridium layer on a silicon wafer.



FIGS. 11A through 11D illustrate a single layer battery formed over an iridium layer according to some embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 12 illustrates battery performance utilizing films deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention.





In the figures, elements having the same designation have the same or similar functions.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, LiCoO2 films are deposited on a substrate by a pulsed-dc physical vapor deposition (PVD) process. In contrast to, for example, Kim et al., LiCoO2 films according to some embodiments of the present invention provide a crystalline LiCoO2 film as deposited on a substrate at a substrate temperature as low as about 220° C. during deposition, without the use of a metallic nucleation or barrier underlying film. The as-deposited crystalline LiCoO2 films can be easily ripened to very high crystalline condition by anneal. In addition, the as deposited crystalline films, when positioned on a noble metal film can be annealed at much further reduced temperatures, for example as low as 400 to 500° C. instead of 700° C., providing for deposition, annealing, and production of solid state batteries on lower temperature substrates.


In the present application, a single, extended source is described which has been scaled to 400 mm×500 mm for production achieving a high LiCoO2 uniformity at a deposition rate of 1.2 microns thickness an hour over an area of 2000 cm2, without the need for secondary front side ion source or ion assistance.


On other depositions utilizing this process, a temperature measurement of the substrate during deposition showed that the substrate remained at less than 224° C. Temperature measurements were performed utilizing a temperature sticker purchased from Omega Engineering, Stamford, Conn. (Model no. TL-F-390, active from 199-224° C.).


Moreover, in some embodiments, films deposited according to the present invention can have a deposition rate of from about 10 to about 30 times higher than processes in conventional films. Deposition thicknesses and times of deposition for films deposited according to the present invention are illustrated in Table I. Furthermore, films according to the present invention can be deposited on wide area substrates having a surface area from 10 to 50 times the surface area of prior sputtering processes, resulting in much higher productivity and much lower cost of manufacture, thereby providing high-volume, low-cost batteries.


Further, conventional deposition processes without ion sources are capable of depositing amorphous LiCoO2 layers, but do not deposit crystalline LiCoO2 layers. Surprisingly, depositions according to some embodiment of the present invention, deposit a LiCoO2 layer with substantial crystallinity readily measured by x-ray diffraction techniques. In some embodiments, the crystallinity of the as-deposited LiCoO2 layers is sufficient to be utilized in a battery structure with no further thermal processing. In some embodiments, crystallinity of the as-deposited LiCoO2 layers are improved by thermal processes with low thermal budgets, which can be compatible with films deposited on low-temperature substrates.


Further, as-deposited the stoichiometry of some LiCoO2 layers deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention shows that this layer is sufficient for utilization in a battery. With the demonstrated ability to deposit a LiCoO2 film with crystallinity and with sufficient stoichiometry, a battery utilizing as-deposited LiCoO2 films can be produced. Heat treating the LiCoO2 layers may improve the crystallinity and lower the impedance.


In some embodiments, a crystalline layer of LiCoO2 with a <101> or a <003> crystalline orientation is deposited directly on the substrate. Deposition of crystalline material can eliminate or lessen the need of a subsequent high temperature anneal or precious-metal layers to crystallize and orient the film. Removing the high temperature anneal allows for formation of battery structures on light-weight and low temperature substrates such as stainless steel foil, copper foil, aluminum foil, and plastic sheet, reducing both the weight and the cost of batteries while retaining the energy density storage capabilities of Li-based batteries. In some embodiments, a crystalline LiCoO2 layer can be deposited on a precious metal layer, such as iridium, resulting in a further significant lowering of the ripening thermal budget required to improve crystallinity.


Deposition of materials by pulsed-DC biased reactive ion deposition is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/101,863, entitled “Biased Pulse DC Reactive Sputtering of Oxide Films,” to Hongmei Zhang, et al., filed on Mar. 16, 2002. Preparation of targets is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/101,341, entitled “Rare-Earth Pre-Alloyed PVD Targets for Dielectric Planar Applications,” to Vassiliki Milonopoulou, et al., filed on Mar. 16, 2002. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/101,863 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/101,341 are each assigned to the same assignee as is the present disclosure and each is incorporated herein in their entirety. Deposition of oxide materials has also been described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,289, which is also herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Transparent oxide films can be deposited utilizing processes similar to those specifically described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,506,289 and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/101,863.



FIG. 1A shows a schematic of a reactor apparatus 10 for sputtering material from a target 12 according to the present invention. In some embodiments, apparatus 10 may, for example, be adapted from an AKT-1600 PVD (400×500 mm substrate size) system from Applied Komatsu or an AKT-4300 (600×720 mm substrate size) system from Applied Komatsu, Santa Clara, Calif. The AKT-1600 reactor, for example, has three deposition chambers connected by a vacuum transport chamber. These AKT reactors can be modified such that pulsed DC power is supplied to the target and RF power is supplied to the substrate during deposition of a material film.


Apparatus 10 includes target 12 which is electrically coupled through a filter 15 to a pulsed DC power supply 14. In some embodiments, target 12 is a wide area sputter source target, which provides material to be deposited on a substrate 16. Substrate 16 is positioned parallel to and opposite target 12. Target 12 functions as a cathode when power is applied to it from the pulsed DC power supply 14 and is equivalently termed a cathode. Application of power to target 12 creates a plasma 53. Substrate 16 is capacitively coupled to an electrode 17 through an insulator 54. Electrode 17 can be coupled to an RF power supply 18. A magnet 20 is scanned across the top of target 12.


For pulsed reactive dc magnetron sputtering, as performed by apparatus 10, the polarity of the power supplied to target 12 by power supply 14 oscillates between negative and positive potentials. During the positive period, the insulating layer on the surface of target 12 is discharged and arcing is prevented. To obtain arc free deposition, the pulsing frequency exceeds a critical frequency that can depend on target material, cathode current and reverse time. High quality oxide films can be made using reactive pulse DC magnetron sputtering as shown in apparatus 10.


Pulsed DC power supply 14 can be any pulsed DC power supply, for example an AE Pinnacle plus 10K by Advanced Energy, Inc. With this DC power supply, up to 10 kW of pulsed DC power can be supplied at a frequency of between 0 and 350 kHz. The reverse voltage can be 10% of the negative target voltage. Utilization of other power supplies can lead to different power characteristics, frequency characteristics, and reverse voltage percentages. The reverse time on this embodiment of power supply 14 can be adjusted between 0 and 5 μs.


Filter 15 prevents the bias power from power supply 18 from coupling into pulsed DC power supply 14. In some embodiments, power supply 18 can be a 2 MHz RF power supply, for example a Nova-25 power supply made by ENI, Colorado Springs, Co.


In some embodiments, filter 15 can be a 2 MHz sinusoidal band rejection filter. In some embodiments, the band width of the filter can be approximately 100 kHz. Filter 15, therefore, prevents the 2 MHz power from the bias to substrate 16 from damaging power supply 14 and allow passage of the pulsed-dc power and frequency.


Pulsed DC deposited films are not fully dense and may have columnar structures. Columnar structures can be detrimental to thin film applications such as barrier films and dielectric films, where high density is important, due to the boundaries between the columns. The columns act to lower the dielectric strength of the material, but may provide diffusion paths for transport or diffusion of electrical current, ionic current, gas, or other chemical agents such as water. In the case of a solid state battery, a columnar structure containing crystallinity as derived from processes according to the present invention is beneficial for battery performance because it allows better Li transport through the boundaries of the material.


In the deposition system, target 12 can have an active size of about 675.7×582.48 mm by 4 to 8 mm in order to deposit films on substrate 16 that have dimension about 400×500 mm. The temperature of substrate 16 can be adjusted to between −50° C. and 500° C. The distance between target 12 and substrate 16 can be between about 3 and about 9 cm (in some embodiments, between 4.8 and 6 cm are used). Process gas can be inserted into the chamber of apparatus 10 at a rate up to about 200 sccm while the pressure in the chamber of apparatus 10 can be held at between about 0.7 and 6 milliTorr. Magnet 20 provides a magnetic field of strength between about 400 and about 600 Gauss directed in the plane of target 12 and is moved across target 12 at a rate of less than about 20-30 sec/scan. In some embodiments utilizing the AKT reactor, magnet 20 can be a race-track shaped magnet with dimensions about 150 mm by 600 mm.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of target 12. A film deposited on a substrate positioned on carrier sheet 17 directly opposed to region 52 of target 12 has good thickness uniformity. Region 52 is the region shown in FIG. 1B that is exposed to a uniform plasma condition. In some implementations, carrier 17 can be coextensive with region 52. Region 24 shown in FIG. 2 indicates the area below which both physically and chemically uniform deposition can be achieved, for example where physical and chemical uniformity provide refractive index uniformity, oxide film uniformity, or metallic film uniformity. FIG. 2 indicates region 52 of target 12 that provides thickness uniformity, which is, in general, larger than region 24 of target 12 providing thickness and chemical uniformity to the deposited film. In optimized processes, however, regions 52 and 24 may be coextensive.


In some embodiments, magnet 20 extends beyond area 52 in one direction, for example the Y direction in FIG. 2, so that scanning is necessary in only one direction, for example the X direction, to provide a time averaged uniform magnetic field. As shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, magnet 20 can be scanned over the entire extent of target 12, which is larger than region 52 of uniform sputter erosion. Magnet 20 is moved in a plane parallel to the plane of target 12.


The combination of a uniform target 12 with a target area 52 larger than the area of substrate 16 can provide films of highly uniform thickness. Further, the material properties of the film deposited can be highly uniform. The conditions of sputtering at the target surface, such as the uniformity of erosion, the average temperature of the plasma at the target surface, and the equilibration of the target surface with the gas phase ambient of the process are uniform over a region which is greater than or equal to the region to be coated with a uniform film thickness. In addition, the region of uniform film thickness is greater than or equal to the region of the film which is to have highly uniform electrical, mechanical, or optical properties such as index of refraction, stoichiometry, density, transmission, or absorptivity.


Target 12 can be formed of any materials that provide the correct stoichiometry for LiCoO2 deposition. Typical ceramic target materials include oxides of Li and Co as well as metallic Li and Co additions and dopants such as Ni, Si, Nb, or other suitable metal oxide additions. In the present disclosure, target 12 can be formed from LiCoO2 for deposition of LiCoO2 film.


In some embodiments of the invention, material tiles are formed. These tiles can be mounted on a backing plate to form a target for apparatus 10. A wide area sputter cathode target can be formed from a close packed array of smaller tiles. Target 12, therefore, may include any number of tiles, for example between 2 and 60 individual tiles. Tiles can be finished to a size so as to provide a margin of edge-wise non-contact, tile to tile, less than about 0.010″ to about 0.020″ or less than half a millimeter so as to eliminate plasma processes that may occur between adjacent ones of tiles 30. The distance between tiles of target 12 and the dark space anode or ground shield 19 in FIG. 1B can be somewhat larger so as to provide non contact assembly or to provide for thermal expansion tolerance during process chamber conditioning or operation.


As shown in FIG. 1B, a uniform plasma condition can be created in the region between target 12 and substrate 16 in a region overlying substrate 16. A plasma 53 can be created in region 51, which extends under the entire target 12. A central region 52 of target 12 can experience a condition of uniform sputter erosion. As discussed further herein, a layer deposited on a substrate placed anywhere below central region 52 can then be uniform in thickness and other properties (i.e., dielectric, optical index, or material concentrations). In some embodiments, target 12 is substantially planar in order to provide uniformity in the film deposited on substrate 16. In practice, planarity of target 12 can mean that all portions of the target surface in region 52 are within a few millimeters of a planar surface, and can be typically within 0.5 mm of a planar surface.



FIG. 3 shows a battery structure with a LiCoO2 layer deposited according to some embodiments of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, a metallic current collection layer 302 is deposited on a substrate 301. In some embodiments, current collection layer 302 can be patterned in various ways before deposition of a LiCoO2 layer 303. Also according to some embodiments, LiCoO2 layer 303 can be a deposited crystalline layer. In some embodiments of the invention, layer 303 is crystalline without the necessity of a crystallizing heat treatment. Therefore, substrate 301 can be a silicon wafer, titanium metal, alumina, or other conventional high temperature substrate, but may also be a low temperature material such as plastic, glass, or other material which could be susceptible to damage from the high temperature crystallizing heat treatment. This feature can have the great advantage of decreasing the expense and weight of battery structures formed by the present invention. The low temperature deposition of the LiCoO2 allows for successive depositions of battery layers, one upon another. Such a process would have the advantage that successive layers of battery structure would be obtained in a stacked condition without the inclusion of a substrate layer. The stacked layered battery would provide higher specific energy density as well as low impedance operation for charging and discharging.


In some embodiments, an oxide layer can be deposited on substrate 301. For example, a silicon oxide layer can be deposited on a silicon wafer. Other layers can be formed between conducting layer 302 and substrate 301.


As further shown in FIG. 3, a LiPON layer 304 (LixPOyNz,) is deposited over LiCoO2 layer 303. LiPON layer 304 is the electrolyte for battery 300 while LiCoO2 layer 303 acts as the cathode. A metallic conducting layer 305 can be deposited over the LiPON layer 304 in order to complete the battery. Metallic conducting layer 305 can include lithium adjacent to LiPON layer 304.


An anode 305 is deposited over LiPON layer 304. Anode 305 can be, for example an evaporated lithium metal. Other materials such as, for example, nickel can also be utilized. A current collector 306, which is a conducting material, is then deposited over at least a portion of anode 305.


A Li based thin film battery operates by transport of Li ions in the direction from current collector 306 to current collector 302 in order to hold the voltage between current collector 306 and current collector 302 at a constant voltage. The ability for battery structure 300 to supply steady current, then, depends on the ability of Li ions to diffuse through LiPON layer 304 and LiCoO2 layer 303. Li transport through bulk cathode LiCoO2 layer 303 in a thin film battery occurs by the way of grains or grain boundaries. Without being restricted in this disclosure to any particular theory of transport, it is believed that the grains with their planes parallel to substrate 302 will block the flow of Li ions while grains oriented with planes perpendicular to substrate 301 (i.e., oriented parallel to the direction of Li ion flow) facilitate the Li diffusion. Therefore, in order to provide a high-current battery structure, LiCoO2 layer 303 should include crystals oriented in the <101> direction or <003> direction.


In accordance with the present invention, LiCoO2 films can be deposited on substrate 302 with a pulsed-DC biased PVD system as was described above. In addition, an AKT 1600 PVD system can be modified to provide an RF bias and an Advanced Energy Pinnacle plus 10K pulsed DC power supply can be utilized to provide power to a target. The pulsing frequency of the power supply can vary from about 0 to about 350 KHz. The power output of the power supply is between 0 and about 10 kW. A target of densified LiCoO2 tiles having a resistivity in the range of about 3 to about 10 kΩ can be utilized with dc-sputtering.


In some embodiments, LiCoO2 films are deposited on Si wafers. Gas flows containing Oxygen and Argon can be utilized. In some embodiments, the Oxygen to Argon ratio ranges from 0 to about 50% with a total gas flow of about 80 sccm. The pulsing frequency ranges from about 200 kHz to about 300 kHz during deposition. RF bias can also be applied to the substrate. In many trials, the deposition rates vary from about 2 Angstrom/(kW sec) to about 1 Angstrom/(kW sec) depending on the O2/Ar ratio as well as substrate bias.


Table I illustrates some example depositions of LiCoO2 according to the present invention. XRD (x-Ray Diffraction) results taken on the resulting thin films illustrate that films deposited according to the present invention are crystalline films, often with highly textured grain sizes as large as about 150 nm. The dominant crystal orientation appears to be sensitive to the O2/Ar ratio. For certain O2/Ar ratios (˜10%), as-deposited films exhibit a preferred orientation in the <101> direction or the <003> direction with poorly developed <003> planes.



FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate an XRD Analysis and SEM cross section, respectively, of the LiCoO2 film deposited as Example 15 in Table I. Such a LiCoO2 film was deposited on Si wafer with 2 kW of target power, a frequency of 300 kHz, with 60 sccm Ar and 20 sccm of O2 for a substrate with an initial temperature of about 30° C. As shown in the XRD analysis of FIG. 4A, a strong <101> peak is indicated showing a strong orientation of LiCoO2 crystals in the desired <101> crystallographic direction. The SEM cross section shown in FIG. 4B further shows the columnar structure of the film having the <101> direction and the grain boundaries of the resulting LiCoO2 crystals.



FIGS. 5A through 5E show SEM cross sections of further example depositions of LiCoO2 crystals according to the present invention. In each of the examples, deposition of the LiCoO2 film was performed on a Si wafer with target power of about 2 kW and frequency of about 250 kHz. The LiCoO2 film shown in FIG. 5A corresponds to the example deposition Example 1 in Table I. In the deposition of the LiCoO2 film shown in FIG. 5A, no bias power was utilized with an argon flow rate of about 80 sccm and an oxygen flow rate of about 0 sccm. A deposition rate of about 1.45 μm/hr was achieved over the full substrate area of 400×500 mm. Further, as is indicated in the cross section shown in FIG. 5A, a <101> orientation of the LiCoO2 was achieved.


The rate of deposition of the LiCoO2 layer shown in FIG. 5A is very high, likely due to the relatively high conductivity or low resistivity of the ceramic LiCoO2 oxide sputter target. A target resistance of 10 kOhms was measured by means of an Ohm meter over a distance of about 4 cm on the surface of target 12. This high rate allows the manufacture of the 3 micron or thicker LiCoO2 layer required for the battery at high rate over a wide area in short times, resulting in very high productivity and very low cost. Target resistance on the order of about 500 kΩ over the same distance by the same measurement technique or higher would not allow for such a high sputter efficiency or high rate of deposition at such a low target power. The resistance of conventional target materials can be unmeasurably high. A resistance of 100 kΩ over about 4 cm of surface will result in high sputter efficiency and high rate of deposition. Further, because deposition rates typically scale nearly linearly with target power, a deposition at 6 kW will yield a deposition rate of approximately 3 μm/hr, which is a very desirable rate of deposition for manufacturability of Li-based thin-film solid-state batteries on a surface area of 400×500 mm2.


The LiCoO2 layer shown in FIG. 5B is deposited under the conditions listed as Example 7 in Table I. Again, no bias was utilized in the deposition. An argon flow rate of about 72 sccm and an oxygen flow rate of about 8 sccm was utilized. The deposition rate was significantly reduced to about 0.85 μm/hr. Further, although a <101> crystallinity can be discerned, that <101> crystallinity is not as pronounced as that exhibited in the deposition of the film shown in FIG. 5A.


The LiCoO2 film shown in FIG. 5C was deposited according to Example 3 in Table I. In this deposition, 100 W of bias power is applied to the substrate. Further, an argon flow rate of 72 sccm, and an oxygen flow rate of 8 sccm was utilized. The deposition rate was about 0.67 μm/hr. Therefore, the application of bias in comparison with the LiCoO2 film shown in FIG. 5B further reduced the deposition rate (from 0.85 μm/hr of the example shown in FIG. 5B to 0.67 μm/hr of the example shown in FIG. 5C). Further, the desired <101> directionality of formed crystals appears to be further degraded.


The LiCoO2 film shown in FIG. 5D corresponds to Example 4 in Table I. In this deposition, the Ar/O2 ratio was increased. As is shown in FIG. 5D, increasing the Ar/O2 ratio improves crystallinity. With respect to the example illustrated in FIG. 5C, the deposition illustrated in FIG. 5D was performed with an argon flow of about 76 sccm and an oxygen flow of about 4 sccm as well as retaining the 100 W bias to the substrate. The LiCoO2 deposition rate was improved to 0.79 μm/hr from a rate of 0.67 μm/hr illustrated in FIG. 5C.


In the example deposition illustrated in FIG. 5E corresponding to Example 5 in Table I. The substrate temperature was set at about 200° C. while the bias power remained at about 100 W. The argon flow rate was set at about 76 sccm and the oxygen flow rate was set at about 4 sccm. The resulting deposition rate for the LiCoO2 layer was about 0.74 μm/hr.


In Example 6 of Table I, the argon flow rate was set at about 74 sccm and the oxygen flow rate was set at about 6 sccm, resulting in a LiCoO2 deposition rate of about 0.67 μm/hr. Therefore, increasing both argon and oxygen flow rate over the deposition illustrated in FIG. 5E resulted in a lower deposition rate.


The data show clearly that an as-deposited crystalline film of LiCoO2 can be obtained under several of the process conditions, as shown in Table II. In particular, very high rates of deposition with low power are obtained along with the oriented crystalline structure for the process conditions according to embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 6A illustrates a layer of LiCoO2 602 deposited on a thin substrate 601 according to some embodiments of the present invention. Higher lithium-ion mobilities can be achieved utilizing crystalline LiCoO2 cathode films 602 deposited on a thin substrate 601 that has thickness comparable to that of the battery stack itself, rather than a thickness many or tens of times that of the battery stack. Such a film can lead to faster charging and discharging rates. Substrate 601 can be formed of a thin metallic sheet (e.g., aluminum, titanium, stainless steel, or other suitable thin metallic sheet), can be formed of a polymer or plastic material, or may be formed of a ceramic or glass material. As shown in FIG. 6B, if substrate 601 is an insulating material, a conducting layer 603 can be deposited between substrate 601 and LiCoO2 layer 602.


Depositing materials on a thin substrate involves holding and positioning the substrate during deposition. FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D illustrate a reusable fixture 700 for holding a thin film substrate. As shown in FIG. 7A, reusable fixture 700 includes a top portion 701 and a bottom portion 702 that snap together. Thin substrate 601 is positioned between top portion 701 and bottom portion 702. As shown in FIG. 7B, top portion 701 and bottom portion 702 are such that substrate 601 is brought into tension and subsequently clamped as top portion 701 is closed into bottom portion 702. Substrate 601 can be easily held by fixture 700 so that substrate 601 can be handled and positioned. In some embodiments, the corners of substrate 601, areas 703, are removed so that substrate 601 is more easily stretched by avoiding “wrap-around” corner clamping effects when top portion 701 is closed into bottom portion 702.


As shown in FIG. 7C, a mask 712 can be attached to fixture 700. In some embodiments, fixture 700 includes guides in order to align fixture 700 with respect to mask 712.


In some embodiments, mask 712 may be attached to fixture 700 and travel with fixture 700. Mask 712 can be positioned at any desired height above substrate 601 in fixture 700. Therefore, mask 712 can function as either a contact or proximity mask. In some embodiments, mask 712 is formed of another thin substrate mounted in a fixture similar to fixture 700.


As shown in FIGS. 7C and 7D, fixture 700 and mask 712 can be positioned relative to mount 710. Mount 710, for example, can be a susceptor, mount, or an electrostatic chuck of a processing chamber such as that shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Fixture 700 and mask 712 can have features that allow for ready alignment with respect to each other and with respect to mount 710. In some embodiments, mask 712 is resident in the processing chamber and aligned with fixture 700 during positioning of fixture 700 on mount 710, as shown in FIG. 7D.


Utilizing fixture 700 as shown in FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, and 7D allows processing of a thin film substrate in a processing chamber. In some embodiments, thin film substrates can be about 10 μm or more. Further, thin film substrate 601, once mounted within fixture 700, can be handled and moved from process chamber to process chamber. Therefore, a multiprocessor chamber system can be utilized to form stacks of layers, including one or more layers of LiCoO2 deposited according to embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 8 illustrates a cluster tool 800 for processing thin film substrates. Cluster tool 800 can, for example, include load lock 802 and load lock 803, through which mounted thin film substrate 601 is loaded and a resultant device is removed from cluster tool 800. Chambers 804, 805, 806, 807, and 808 are processing chambers for depositions of materials, heat treatments, etching, or other processes. One or more of chambers 804, 805, 806, 807, and 808 can be a pulsed-DC PVD chamber such as that discussed above with respect to FIGS. 1A and 1B and within which a LiCoO2 film deposited according to embodiments of the present invention may be deposited.


Processing chambers 804, 805, 806, 807, and 808 as well as load locks 802 and 803 are coupled by transfer chamber 801. Transfer chamber 801 includes substrate transfer robotics to shuttle individual wafers between processing chambers 804, 805, 806, 807, and 808 and load locks 802 and 803.


In production of a conventional thin-film battery, ceramic substrates are loaded into load lock 803. A thin metallic layer can be deposited in chamber 804, followed by a LiCoO2 deposition performed in chamber 805. The substrate is then removed through load lock 803 for an in-air heat treatment external to cluster tool 800. The treated wafer is then reloaded into cluster tool 800 through load lock 802. A LiPON layer can be deposited in chamber 806. The wafer is then again removed from cluster tool 800 for deposition of the lithium anode layer, or sometimes chamber 807 can be adapted to deposition of the lithium anode layer. A second metallic layer is deposited in chamber 808 to form a charge collector and anode collector. The finished battery structure is then off-loaded from cluster tool 800 in load lock 802. Wafers are shuttled from chamber to chamber by robotics in transfer chamber 801.


A battery structure produced according to the present invention could utilize thin film substrates loaded in a fixture such as fixture 700. Fixture 700 is then loaded into load lock 803. Chamber 804 may still include deposition of a conducting layer. Chamber 805 then includes deposition of a LiCoO2 layer according to embodiments of the present invention. A LiPON layer can then be deposited in chamber 806. Chamber 807 may still be adapted to deposition of a lithium rich material such as lithium metal and chamber 808 can be utilized for deposition of the conducting layer of the current collector. In this process, no heat treatment is utilized to crystallize the LiCoO2 layer.


Another advantage of a thin film battery process is the ability to stack battery structures. In other words, substrates loaded into cluster tool 800 may traverse process chambers 804, 805, 806, 807, and 808 multiple times in order to produce multiply stacked battery structures. FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate such battery structures.



FIG. 9A illustrates a parallel coupled stacking. As shown in FIG. 9A, a substrate 601, which for example can be a plastic substrate, is loaded into load lock 803. A conducting layer 603, for example about 2 μm of aluminum, copper, iridium or other material, acts as a bottom current collector. Conducting layer 603, for example, can be deposited in chamber 804. A LiCoO2 layer 602 is then deposited on conducting layer 603. LiCoO2 layer 602 can be about 3-10 μm and can be deposited in chamber 805 according to embodiments of the present invention. The wafer can then be moved to chamber 806 where a LiPON layer 901 of thickness of about 0.5 to about 2 μm can be deposited. In chamber 807, an anode layer 902, for example a lithium metal layer of up to about 10 μm, can then be deposited in chamber 807. A second conducting layer 903 can then be deposited over anode layer 902. A second battery stack can then be deposited over the first battery stack formed by metal layer 603, LiCoO2 layer 602, LiPON layer 901, lithium layer 902, and current collection conduction layer 903. Over current collection conducting layer 903, another lithium layer 902 is formed. Another LiPON layer 901 is formed over lithium layer 902. Another LiCoO2 layer 602 is formed over LiPON layer 901 and finally another metal layer 603 is formed over LiCoO2 layer 602. In some embodiments, further stackings can be formed. In some embodiments, metal layers 603 and 903 differ in the mask utilized in deposition so that tabs are formed for electrical coupling of layers.


As discussed above, any number of individual battery stacks can be formed such that parallel battery formations are formed. Such a parallel arrangement of battery stacking structure can be indicated as Current collector/LiCoO2/LiPON/Anode/current collector/Anode/LiPON/LiCoO2/current collector/LiCoO2 . . . /current collector. FIG. 9B illustrates an alternative stacking corresponding to the battery structure current collector/LiCoO2/LiPON/anode/current collector/LiCoO2/LiPON/anode/current collector . . . /current collector. In this case, a series arrangement battery stacking structure is formed because the individual battery stacks share anodes.


To form the structures shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B, substrates are rotated again through the chambers of cluster tool 800 in order to deposit the multiple sets of batteries. In general, a stack of any number of batteries can be deposited in this fashion.


In some embodiments, stoichiometric LiCoO2 can be deposited on iridium. FIGS. 10A through 10D illustrate an anneal procedure for Li—Co deposition over an iridium layer that has been deposited on a Si wafer. The LiCoO2 deposition was accomplished as discussed above with a target power of 2 kW, no bias power, reverse time of 1.6 μs, a pulsing frequency of 300 kHz, with 60 sccm Ar flow and 20 sccm of O2 flow, with no pre-heat for 7200 sec. As a result, a layer of LiCoO2 of about 1.51 μm was deposited.



FIGS. 10A through 10D show XRD analysis of both as-deposited and annealed layers of LiCoO2 deposited as discussed above. The XRD analysis of the as-deposited layer demonstrates a shallow peak at 2θ=18.85° denoting a <003> orientation of crystalline LiCoO2, a sharper peak at about 2θ=38.07° corresponding with the desired <101> crystallographic direction, and a peak at 2θ=40.57° corresponding to the <111> direction of iridium. However, the position of the <101> LiCoO2 peak indicates that the <101> LiCoO2 peak is nonstoichiometric LiCoO2. In order to be useful as a battery layer, stoichiometric LiCoO2 provides for the best Li transport. One of ordinary skill in the art will notice that careful adjustment of deposition parameters can provide stoichiometric LiCoO2 of desired orientation.



FIG. 10B shows an XRD analysis of the sample shown in FIG. 10A after a 300° C. anneal in air for 2 hours. As shown in FIG. 10B, the XRD peak corresponding to <003> LiCoO2 grows, indicating crystallization of LiCoO2 into the <003> direction. Further, the <101> peak of LiCoO2 shifts slightly to 2θ=38.53°, indicating a more stoichiometric crystallization of the <101> LiCoO2. However, the crystalline LiCoO2 is still not stoichiometric after this anneal. One of ordinary skill in the art will notice that longer anneals and/or further adjustment of the deposited stoichiometry may result in usefully oriented stoichiometric LiCoO2 layers with anneal temperatures at 300° C. or less. Consequently, low temperature materials such as polymers, glass, or metal may be utilized as the substrate.



FIG. 10C illustrates an XRD analysis from the sample after a subsequent 500° C. anneal in air for 2 hours. As shown in FIG. 10C, more of the LiCoO2 crystallizes into the <003> layer. Further, the <101> LiCoO2 peak shifts again to 2θ=39.08°, indicating crystallization of a <012> layer of LiCoO2. In this case, the <012> LiCoO2 crystal is stoichiometric and therefore allows for efficient Li transport. One of ordinary skill in the art will notice that longer anneals and/or further adjustment of the deposited stoichiometry may result in usefully oriented stoichiometric LiCoO2 layers with anneal temperatures at 500° C. or less. Consequently, low temperature materials such as polymers, glass, or metal may be utilized as the substrate.



FIG. 10D illustrates an XRD analysis of the sample after a subsequent anneal of 700° C. in air for 2 hours. As shown in FIG. 10D, the <003> LiCoO2 peak disappears, but the <012> LiCoO2 peak remains relatively the same as that shown in the 500° anneal illustrated in FIG. 10C.



FIGS. 10A through 10D demonstrate deposition of <101> LiCoO2 at low temperature over an iridium layer. Subsequent anneals to 500° C. may be desired to change the stoichiometry of the <101> LiCoO2 layer, but anneals to 700° C. do not appear to be necessary. With anneal temperatures less than 500° C., depositions of a LiCoO2 layer over a conducting iridium layer can be accomplished on glass, aluminum foil, plastic, or other low temperature substrate material. Anneal temperatures of less than 500° C. but greater than 300° C. or lengthening the time of lower temperature anneals may also result in desired orientations of stoichiometric crystalline LiCoO2.



FIGS. 11A through 11D illustrate formation of a single-layer battery according to some embodiments of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 11A, a lift-off layer 1102 can be deposited on a substrate 1101. Further, an iridium layer 1103 can be deposited over lift-off layer 1102. In some embodiments, substrate 1101 can be plastic, glass, Al foil, Si wafer, or any other material. Lift-off layer 1102 can be any lift off layer and can be a polymer layer such as polyimide, an inorganic layer such as CaF2 or carbon, or an adhesive layer that loses its adhesion as a result of, for example, oxidation, heat, or light. Lift-off layers are well known. Iridium layer 1103 can be from about 500 Å or more.


As shown in FIG. 11B, a LiCoO2 layer is deposited over iridium layer 1103 as was discussed above. In some embodiments, an anneal can be performed at this step. In some embodiments, further layers of the battery may be deposited before an anneal step is performed. In some embodiments, a stoichiometric LiCoO2 layer of a useful crystalline orientation may result in the as-deposited LiCoO2 with no further anneals necessary.



FIG. 11C illustrates deposition of a LiPON layer 1105 over the LiCoO2 layer, deposition of a Li layer 1106 over LiPON layer 1105, and deposition of an electrode layer 1107 over Li layer 1106. In some embodiments, an anneal step of up to 500° C. as discussed above may be performed here.


As shown in FIG. 11D, the resulting single-layer battery formed from iridium layer 1103, LiCoO2 layer 1104, LiPON layer 1105, Li layer 1106, and electrode layer 1107 can be “lifted off” from substrate 1101. Such a single-layer battery can be a free-standing battery of thickness about 5 μm or greater. Such a battery, without the requirement of a substrate 1101, is well known to have the potential of energy storage of greater than about 1 kW-hr/liter.


As an alternative to a lift-off process as described in FIGS. 11A through 11D, a substrate may be removed during anneal leaving a single-layer battery. Further, in some embodiments, substrate 1101 can be removed by a solvent, etching, or a photo process. Further, single-layer batteries may be combined or stacked in any fashion to provide a device of greater energy storage at a particular voltage.



FIG. 12 illustrates performance of a battery structure such as that shown in FIGS. 9A and 9B with a LiCoO2 film deposited according to the present invention. The film was annealed at 700 C for a 2 hour period and characterized by Oakridge Microenergy, Inc., of Oakridge, Tenn.


One skilled in the art will recognize variations and modifications of the examples specifically discussed in this disclosure. These variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope and spirit of this disclosure. As such, the scope is limited only by the following claims.


















TABLE I












Initial











Substrate











Temperature











(temperature











during

Film



Target
Bias Power
Reverse
Frequency


deposit)
Deposition
Thickness


Example #
Power (kW)
(W)
Time (μs)
(kHz)
Ar (sccm)
O2 (sccm)
(° C.)
Time (sec)
(μm)
























1
2
0
1.6
250
80
0
30
10000
3.9


2
2
0

250
72
8
30
7200
1.7


3
2
100

250
72
8
30
7200
1.34


4
2
100

250
76
4
30
7200
1.57


5
2
100

250
76
4
200
7200
1.3


6
2
100

250
74
6
200
7200
1.3


7
2
0

300
72
8
30
7200
1.58


8
2
0

300
74
6
30
7200



9
2
100

300
74
6
30
7200



10
2
100

300
72
8
30
7200



11
2
100

300
70
10
30
7200



12
2
0

300
70
10
30
7200



13
2
0

300
72
8
30
7200
1.58


14
2
0

300
74
6
30
7200



15
2
0

300
60
20
30
7200



16
2
0

300
50
30
30
7200



17
2
200

300
60
20
30
7200



18
2
50

300
60
20
30
7200



19
2
0

300
70
10
30
7200



20
2
0

300
65
15
30
7200



21
3
0

300
65
15
30
7200



22
2
0
1.6
250
60
20
30
7200



23
3
0
1.6
250
60
20
30
7200



24
2
0
1.6
250
60
20
30 (NPH)
7200



25
2
0
1.6
250
60
20
10 min heat
7200










30 min coc




26
2
0
1.6
250
60
20
no preheat
9000



27
2
0

300
60
20
no preheat
7200



28
2
0

300
60
20
15 min heat,
7200










10 min




29
2
0

250
60
20
no preheat




30
2
0

250
60
20
10 min,











10 min






















TABLE II





Example #
Phase
Lattice
Texture
d101 [Å]
2θ [°]
crystallite size [Å]





















15
LiCoO2
rhombohedral
strong [101]
2.376(1)
37.83
~1300


16
LiCoO2
Rhombohedral
strong [101]
2.375(1)
37.85
~750


17
Co
cubic
random


<50


18
Co
cubic
random


<50


19
LiCoO2
rhombohedral
strong [101]
2.370(1)
37.93
~1400


20
LiCoO2
rhombohedral
strong [101]
2.372(1)
37.90
~1500


21
LiCoO2
rhombohedral
strong [101]
2.370(1)
37.92
~1700


PDF
LiCoO2
Rhombohedral
random
2.408(1)
37.31









Claims
  • 1. A method of depositing a LiCoO2 layer, comprising: placing a substrate in a reactor;flowing a gaseous mixture including argon and oxygen through the reactor;applying pulsed DC power to a densified conductive ceramic LiCoO2 sputter target having a resistivity of about 3 kΩ-10 kΩ, the densified conductive ceramic LiCoO2 sputter target being positioned opposite the substrate, wherein the conductive ceramic LiCoO2 sputter target comprises Li and Co oxides, Li and Co metallic additions, and at least one dopant of Ni, Si, or Nb;applying an RF bias power to the substrate; andfiltering the RF bias power with a narrow-band rejection filter from coupling into the pulsed DC power,wherein a crystalline layer of LiCoO2 having a columnar structure is deposited over the substrate.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the crystalline layer is <101> oriented.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the crystalline layer is <003> oriented.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein a grain size of the crystalline layer is between about 750 Å and about 1700 Å.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the substrate is a material chosen from a set comprised of silicon, polymers, glasses, ceramics, and metals.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further including preheating the substrate to a temperature of about 200° C.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the substrate is a low temperature substrate.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the low temperature substrate is one of a set of substrates including glass, plastic, and metal foil.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further including forming an oxide layer on the substrate.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the oxide layer is a silicon dioxide layer.
  • 11. The method of claim 2, wherein the crystalline layer is deposited at a rate of greater than about 1 μm per hour.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further including depositing a metal layer on the substrate.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the metal layer is iridium.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further including annealing the crystalline layer with a low thermal budget.
  • 15. The method of claim 12, further including annealing the LiCoO2 layer at a temperature of less than or equal to about 500° C.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, further including annealing the LiCoO2 layer at a temperature of less than or equal to about 400° C.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the thickness uniformity of the crystalline layer of LiCoO2 has a standard deviation of 3% one-sigma.
RELATED APPLICATION

The present application claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/651,363, filed on Feb. 8, 2005, by Hongmei Zhang and Richard E. Demaray, and to Provisional Application No. 60/634,818, filed on Dec. 8, 2004, by the same inventors, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (798)
Number Name Date Kind
712316 Loppe et al. Oct 1902 A
2970180 Urry Jan 1961 A
3309302 Heil Mar 1967 A
3616403 Collins et al. Oct 1971 A
3790432 Fletcher et al. Feb 1974 A
3797091 Gavin Mar 1974 A
3850604 Klein Nov 1974 A
3939008 Longo et al. Feb 1976 A
4006070 King et al. Feb 1977 A
4082569 Evans, Jr. Apr 1978 A
4099091 Yamazoe et al. Jul 1978 A
4111523 Kaminow et al. Sep 1978 A
4127424 Ullery, Jr. Nov 1978 A
4226924 Kimura et al. Oct 1980 A
4283216 Brereton Aug 1981 A
4318938 Barnett et al. Mar 1982 A
4437966 Hope et al. Mar 1984 A
4442144 Pipkin Apr 1984 A
4481265 Ezawa et al. Nov 1984 A
4518661 Rippere May 1985 A
4555456 Kanehori et al. Nov 1985 A
4572873 Kanehori et al. Feb 1986 A
4587225 Tsukuma et al. May 1986 A
4619680 Nourshargh et al. Oct 1986 A
4645726 Hiratani et al. Feb 1987 A
4664993 Sturgis et al. May 1987 A
4668593 Sammells May 1987 A
RE32449 Claussen Jun 1987 E
4672586 Shimohigashi et al. Jun 1987 A
4710940 Sipes, Jr. Dec 1987 A
4728588 Noding et al. Mar 1988 A
4740431 Little Apr 1988 A
4756717 Sturgis et al. Jul 1988 A
4785459 Baer Nov 1988 A
4812712 Ohnishi et al. Mar 1989 A
4826743 Nazri May 1989 A
4865428 Corrigan Sep 1989 A
4878094 Balkanski Oct 1989 A
4903326 Zakman et al. Feb 1990 A
4915810 Kestigian et al. Apr 1990 A
4964877 Keister et al. Oct 1990 A
4977007 Kondo et al. Dec 1990 A
4978437 Wirz Dec 1990 A
5006737 Fay Apr 1991 A
5019467 Fujiwara May 1991 A
5030331 Sato Jul 1991 A
5035965 Sangyoji et al. Jul 1991 A
5055704 Link et al. Oct 1991 A
5057385 Hope et al. Oct 1991 A
5085904 Deak et al. Feb 1992 A
5096852 Hobson Mar 1992 A
5100821 Fay Mar 1992 A
5107538 Benton et al. Apr 1992 A
5110694 Nagasubramanian et al. May 1992 A
5110696 Shokoohi et al. May 1992 A
5119269 Nakayama Jun 1992 A
5119460 Bruce et al. Jun 1992 A
5124782 Hundt et al. Jun 1992 A
5141603 Dickey et al. Aug 1992 A
5147985 DuBrucq Sep 1992 A
5153710 McCain Oct 1992 A
5169408 Biggerstaff et al. Dec 1992 A
5171413 Arntz et al. Dec 1992 A
5173271 Chen et al. Dec 1992 A
5174876 Buchal et al. Dec 1992 A
5180645 More Jan 1993 A
5187564 McCain Feb 1993 A
5196041 Tumminelli et al. Mar 1993 A
5196374 Hundt et al. Mar 1993 A
5200029 Bruce et al. Apr 1993 A
5202201 Meunier et al. Apr 1993 A
5206925 Nakazawa et al. Apr 1993 A
5208121 Yahnke et al. May 1993 A
5217828 Sangyoji et al. Jun 1993 A
5221891 Janda et al. Jun 1993 A
5225288 Beeson et al. Jul 1993 A
5227264 Duval et al. Jul 1993 A
5237439 Misono et al. Aug 1993 A
5252194 Demaray et al. Oct 1993 A
5273608 Nath Dec 1993 A
5287427 Atkins et al. Feb 1994 A
5296089 Chen et al. Mar 1994 A
5300461 Ting Apr 1994 A
5303319 Ford et al. Apr 1994 A
5306569 Hiraki Apr 1994 A
5307240 McMahon Apr 1994 A
5309302 Vollmann May 1994 A
5314765 Bates May 1994 A
5326652 Lake Jul 1994 A
5326653 Chang Jul 1994 A
5338624 Gruenstern et al. Aug 1994 A
5338625 Bates et al. Aug 1994 A
5342709 Yahnke et al. Aug 1994 A
5355089 Treger Oct 1994 A
5360686 Peled et al. Nov 1994 A
5362579 Rossoll et al. Nov 1994 A
5362672 Ohmi et al. Nov 1994 A
5381262 Arima et al. Jan 1995 A
5387482 Anani Feb 1995 A
5401595 Kagawa et al. Mar 1995 A
5403680 Otagawa et al. Apr 1995 A
5411537 Munshi et al. May 1995 A
5411592 Ovshinsky et al. May 1995 A
5419982 Tura et al. May 1995 A
5427669 Drummond Jun 1995 A
5435826 Sakakibara et al. Jul 1995 A
5437692 Dasgupta et al. Aug 1995 A
5445856 Chaloner-Gill Aug 1995 A
5445906 Hobson et al. Aug 1995 A
5448110 Tuttle et al. Sep 1995 A
5449576 Anani Sep 1995 A
5455126 Bates et al. Oct 1995 A
5457569 Liou et al. Oct 1995 A
5458995 Behl et al. Oct 1995 A
5464706 Dasgupta et al. Nov 1995 A
5470396 Mongon et al. Nov 1995 A
5472795 Atita Dec 1995 A
5475528 LaBorde Dec 1995 A
5478456 Humpal et al. Dec 1995 A
5483613 Bruce et al. Jan 1996 A
5493177 Muller et al. Feb 1996 A
5498489 Dasgupta et al. Mar 1996 A
5499207 Miki et al. Mar 1996 A
5501918 Gruenstern et al. Mar 1996 A
5504041 Summerfelt Apr 1996 A
5507930 Yamashita et al. Apr 1996 A
5512147 Bates et al. Apr 1996 A
5512387 Ovshinsky Apr 1996 A
5512389 Dasgupta et al. Apr 1996 A
5515387 Smith May 1996 A
5538796 Schaffer et al. Jul 1996 A
5540742 Sangyoji et al. Jul 1996 A
5547780 Kagawa et al. Aug 1996 A
5547782 Dasgupta et al. Aug 1996 A
5552242 Ovshinsky et al. Sep 1996 A
5555127 Abdelkader et al. Sep 1996 A
5561004 Bates et al. Oct 1996 A
5563979 Bruce et al. Oct 1996 A
5565071 Demaray et al. Oct 1996 A
5567210 Bates et al. Oct 1996 A
5569520 Bates Oct 1996 A
5582935 Dasgupta et al. Dec 1996 A
5591520 Migliorini et al. Jan 1997 A
5597660 Bates et al. Jan 1997 A
5597661 Takeuchi et al. Jan 1997 A
5599355 Nagasubramanian et al. Feb 1997 A
5601952 Dasgupta et al. Feb 1997 A
5603816 Demaray et al. Feb 1997 A
5607560 Hirabayashi et al. Mar 1997 A
5607789 Treger et al. Mar 1997 A
5612152 Bates Mar 1997 A
5612153 Moulton et al. Mar 1997 A
5613995 Bhandarkar et al. Mar 1997 A
5616933 Li Apr 1997 A
5637418 Brown et al. Jun 1997 A
5643480 Gustavsson et al. Jul 1997 A
5644207 Lew et al. Jul 1997 A
5645626 Edlund et al. Jul 1997 A
5645960 Scrosati et al. Jul 1997 A
5654054 Tropsha et al. Aug 1997 A
5654984 Hershbarger et al. Aug 1997 A
5658652 Sellergren Aug 1997 A
5660700 Shimizu et al. Aug 1997 A
5665490 Takeuchi et al. Sep 1997 A
5667538 Bailey Sep 1997 A
5677784 Harris Oct 1997 A
5679980 Summerfelt Oct 1997 A
5681666 Treger et al. Oct 1997 A
5681671 Orita et al. Oct 1997 A
5686360 Harvey, III et al. Nov 1997 A
5689522 Beach Nov 1997 A
5693956 Shi et al. Dec 1997 A
5702829 Paidassi et al. Dec 1997 A
5705293 Hobson Jan 1998 A
5718813 Drummond Feb 1998 A
5719976 Henry et al. Feb 1998 A
5721067 Jacobs et al. Feb 1998 A
RE35746 Lake Mar 1998 E
5731661 So et al. Mar 1998 A
5738731 Shindo et al. Apr 1998 A
5742094 Ting Apr 1998 A
5755938 Fukui et al. May 1998 A
5755940 Shindo May 1998 A
5757126 Harvey, III et al. May 1998 A
5761234 Craig et al. Jun 1998 A
5762768 Goy et al. Jun 1998 A
5763058 Isen et al. Jun 1998 A
5771562 Harvey, III et al. Jun 1998 A
5776278 Tuttle et al. Jul 1998 A
5779839 Tuttle et al. Jul 1998 A
5789071 Sproul et al. Aug 1998 A
5790489 O'Connor Aug 1998 A
5792550 Phillips et al. Aug 1998 A
5805223 Shikakura et al. Sep 1998 A
5811177 Shi et al. Sep 1998 A
5814195 Lehan et al. Sep 1998 A
5830330 Lantsman Nov 1998 A
5831262 Greywall et al. Nov 1998 A
5834137 Zhang et al. Nov 1998 A
5841931 Foresi et al. Nov 1998 A
5842118 Wood, Jr. Nov 1998 A
5845990 Hymer Dec 1998 A
5847865 Gopinath et al. Dec 1998 A
5849163 Ichikawa et al. Dec 1998 A
5851896 Summerfelt Dec 1998 A
5853830 McCaulley et al. Dec 1998 A
5855744 Halsey et al. Jan 1999 A
5856705 Ting Jan 1999 A
5864182 Matsuzaki Jan 1999 A
5865860 Delnick Feb 1999 A
5870273 Sogabe et al. Feb 1999 A
5874184 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1999 A
5882721 Delnick Mar 1999 A
5882946 Otani Mar 1999 A
5889383 Teich Mar 1999 A
5895731 Clingempeel Apr 1999 A
5897522 Nitzan Apr 1999 A
5900057 Buchal et al. May 1999 A
5909346 Malhotra et al. Jun 1999 A
5916704 Lewin et al. Jun 1999 A
5923964 Li Jul 1999 A
5930046 Solberg et al. Jul 1999 A
5930584 Sun et al. Jul 1999 A
5942089 Sproul et al. Aug 1999 A
5948215 Lantsman Sep 1999 A
5948464 Delnick Sep 1999 A
5948562 Fulcher et al. Sep 1999 A
5952778 Haskal et al. Sep 1999 A
5955217 Lerberghe Sep 1999 A
5961672 Skotheim et al. Oct 1999 A
5961682 Lee et al. Oct 1999 A
5966491 DiGiovanni Oct 1999 A
5970393 Khorrami et al. Oct 1999 A
5972516 Kaneko et al. Oct 1999 A
5973913 McEwen et al. Oct 1999 A
5977582 Fleming et al. Nov 1999 A
5982144 Johnson et al. Nov 1999 A
5985485 Ovshinsky et al. Nov 1999 A
6000603 Koskenmaki et al. Dec 1999 A
6001224 Drummond et al. Dec 1999 A
6004660 Topolski et al. Dec 1999 A
6007945 Jacobs et al. Dec 1999 A
6013949 Tuttle Jan 2000 A
6019284 Freeman et al. Feb 2000 A
6023610 Wood, Jr. Feb 2000 A
6024844 Drummond et al. Feb 2000 A
6025094 Visco et al. Feb 2000 A
6028990 Shahani et al. Feb 2000 A
6030421 Gauthier et al. Feb 2000 A
6042965 Nestler et al. Mar 2000 A
6045626 Yano et al. Apr 2000 A
6045652 Tuttle et al. Apr 2000 A
6045942 Miekka et al. Apr 2000 A
6046081 Kuo Apr 2000 A
6048372 Mangahara et al. Apr 2000 A
6051114 Yao et al. Apr 2000 A
6051296 McCaulley et al. Apr 2000 A
6052397 Jeon et al. Apr 2000 A
6057557 Ichikawa May 2000 A
6058233 Dragone May 2000 A
6071323 Kawaguchi Jun 2000 A
6075973 Greeff et al. Jun 2000 A
6077106 Mish Jun 2000 A
6077642 Ogata et al. Jun 2000 A
6078791 Tuttle et al. Jun 2000 A
6080508 Dasgupta et al. Jun 2000 A
6080643 Noguchi et al. Jun 2000 A
6093944 VanDover Jul 2000 A
6094292 Goldner et al. Jul 2000 A
6096569 Matsuno et al. Aug 2000 A
6100108 Mizuno et al. Aug 2000 A
6106933 Nagai et al. Aug 2000 A
6110531 Paz De Araujo Aug 2000 A
6113749 Kok et al. Sep 2000 A
6115616 Halperin et al. Sep 2000 A
6117279 Smolanoff et al. Sep 2000 A
6118426 Albert et al. Sep 2000 A
6120890 Chen et al. Sep 2000 A
6129277 Grant et al. Oct 2000 A
6133670 Rodgers et al. Oct 2000 A
6137671 Staffiere Oct 2000 A
6144916 Wood, Jr. et al. Nov 2000 A
6146225 Sheats et al. Nov 2000 A
6148503 Delnick et al. Nov 2000 A
6157765 Bruce et al. Dec 2000 A
6159635 Dasgupta et al. Dec 2000 A
6160373 Dunn et al. Dec 2000 A
6162709 Raoux et al. Dec 2000 A
6165566 Tropsha Dec 2000 A
6168884 Neudecker et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169474 Greeff et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175075 Shiotsuka et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176986 Watanabe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181283 Johnson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192222 Greeff et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197167 Tanaka Mar 2001 B1
6198217 Suzuki et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204111 Uemoto et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210544 Sasaki Apr 2001 B1
6210545 Farooq et al. Apr 2001 B1
6210832 Visco et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214061 Visco et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214660 Uemoto et al. Apr 2001 B1
6218049 Bates et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220516 Tuttle et al. Apr 2001 B1
6223317 Pax et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228532 Tsuji et al. May 2001 B1
6229987 Greeff et al. May 2001 B1
6232242 Hata et al. May 2001 B1
6235432 Kono et al. May 2001 B1
6236793 Lawrence et al. May 2001 B1
6242129 Johnson Jun 2001 B1
6242132 Neudecker et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248291 Nakagama et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248481 Visco et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248640 Nam Jun 2001 B1
6249222 Gehlot Jun 2001 B1
6252564 Albert et al. Jun 2001 B1
6258252 Miyasaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261917 Quek et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264709 Yoon et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265652 Kurata et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268695 Affinito Jul 2001 B1
6271053 Kondo Aug 2001 B1
6271793 Brady et al. Aug 2001 B1
6271801 Tuttle et al. Aug 2001 B2
6280585 Obinata et al. Aug 2001 B1
6280875 Kwak et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281142 Basceri et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284406 Xing et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287986 Mihara Sep 2001 B1
6289209 Wood, Jr. Sep 2001 B1
6290821 McLeod Sep 2001 B1
6290822 Fleming et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291098 Shibuya et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293688 Deacon Sep 2001 B1
6294722 Kondo et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296741 Pinarbasi Oct 2001 B1
6296949 Bergstresser et al. Oct 2001 B1
6296967 Jacobs et al. Oct 2001 B1
6296971 Hara Oct 2001 B1
6300215 Shin Oct 2001 B1
6302939 Rabin et al. Oct 2001 B1
6306265 Fu et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312274 Lin Nov 2001 B1
6316563 Naijo et al. Nov 2001 B2
6323416 Komori et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324211 Ovard et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325294 Tuttle et al. Dec 2001 B2
6329213 Tuttle et al. Dec 2001 B1
6339236 Tomii et al. Jan 2002 B1
6344366 Bates Feb 2002 B1
6344419 Forster et al. Feb 2002 B1
6344795 Gehlot Feb 2002 B1
6350353 Gopalraja et al. Feb 2002 B2
6351630 Wood, Jr. Feb 2002 B2
6356230 Greef et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356694 Weber Mar 2002 B1
6356764 Ovard et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358810 Dornfest et al. Mar 2002 B1
6360954 Barnardo Mar 2002 B1
6361662 Chiba et al. Mar 2002 B1
6365300 Ota et al. Apr 2002 B1
6365319 Heath et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368275 Sliwa et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369316 Plessing et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372098 Newcomb et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372383 Lee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6372386 Cho et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373224 Goto et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375780 Tuttle et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376027 Lee et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379835 Kucherovsky et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379842 Mayer Apr 2002 B1
6380477 Curtin Apr 2002 B1
6384573 Dunn May 2002 B1
6387563 Bates May 2002 B1
6391166 Wang May 2002 B1
6392565 Brown May 2002 B1
6394598 Kaiser May 2002 B1
6395430 Cho et al. May 2002 B1
6396001 Nakamura May 2002 B1
6398824 Johnson Jun 2002 B1
6399241 Hara et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402039 Freeman et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402795 Chu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6402796 Johnson Jun 2002 B1
6409965 Nagata et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413284 Chu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6413285 Chu et al. Jul 2002 B1
6413382 Wang et al. Jul 2002 B1
6413645 Graff et al. Jul 2002 B1
6413676 Munshi Jul 2002 B1
6414626 Greef et al. Jul 2002 B1
6416598 Sircar Jul 2002 B1
6420961 Bates et al. Jul 2002 B1
6422698 Kaiser Jul 2002 B2
6423106 Bates Jul 2002 B1
6423776 Akkapeddi et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426163 Pasquier et al. Jul 2002 B1
6432577 Shul et al. Aug 2002 B1
6432584 Visco et al. Aug 2002 B1
6433380 Shin Aug 2002 B2
6433465 McKnight et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436156 Wandeloski et al. Aug 2002 B1
6437231 Kurata et al. Aug 2002 B2
6444336 Jia et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444355 Murai et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444368 Hikmet et al. Sep 2002 B1
6444750 Touhsaent Sep 2002 B1
6459418 Comiskey et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459726 Ovard et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466771 Wood, Jr. Oct 2002 B2
6475668 Hosokawa et al. Nov 2002 B1
6481623 Grant et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488822 Moslehi Dec 2002 B1
6494999 Herrera et al. Dec 2002 B1
6495283 Yoon et al. Dec 2002 B1
6497598 Affinito Dec 2002 B2
6500287 Azens et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503661 Park et al. Jan 2003 B1
6503831 Speakman Jan 2003 B2
6506289 Demaray et al. Jan 2003 B2
6511516 Johnson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6511615 Dawes et al. Jan 2003 B1
6517968 Johnson et al. Feb 2003 B2
6522067 Graff et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524466 Bonaventura et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524750 Mansuetto Feb 2003 B1
6525976 Johnson Feb 2003 B1
6528212 Kusumoto et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533907 Demaray et al. Mar 2003 B2
6537428 Xiong et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538211 St. Lawrence et al. Mar 2003 B2
6541147 McLean et al. Apr 2003 B1
6548912 Graff et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549688 Bazylenko Apr 2003 B2
6551745 Moutsios et al. Apr 2003 B2
6558836 Whitacre et al. May 2003 B1
6562513 Takeuchi et al. May 2003 B1
6563998 Farah et al. May 2003 B1
6569564 Lane May 2003 B1
6570325 Graff et al. May 2003 B2
6572173 Muller Jun 2003 B2
6573652 Graff et al. Jun 2003 B1
6576546 Gilbert et al. Jun 2003 B2
6579728 Grant et al. Jun 2003 B2
6582480 Pasquier et al. Jun 2003 B2
6582481 Erbil Jun 2003 B1
6582852 Gao et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589299 Missling et al. Jul 2003 B2
6593150 Ramberg et al. Jul 2003 B2
6599662 Chiang et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600905 Greeff et al. Jul 2003 B2
6602338 Chen et al. Aug 2003 B2
6603139 Tessler et al. Aug 2003 B1
6603391 Greeff et al. Aug 2003 B1
6605228 Kawaguchi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6608464 Lew et al. Aug 2003 B1
6610440 LaFollette et al. Aug 2003 B1
6615614 Makikawa et al. Sep 2003 B1
6616035 Ehrensvard et al. Sep 2003 B2
6618829 Pax et al. Sep 2003 B2
6620545 Goenka et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622049 Penner et al. Sep 2003 B2
6632563 Krasnov et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637906 Knoerzer et al. Oct 2003 B2
6637916 Mullner Oct 2003 B2
6639578 Comiskey et al. Oct 2003 B1
6641704 Someno Nov 2003 B2
6645675 Munshi Nov 2003 B1
6650000 Ballantine et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650942 Howard et al. Nov 2003 B2
6662430 Brady et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664006 Munshi Dec 2003 B1
6673484 Matsuura Jan 2004 B2
6673716 D'Couto et al. Jan 2004 B1
6674159 Peterson et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677070 Kearl Jan 2004 B2
6683244 Fujimori et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683749 Daby et al. Jan 2004 B2
6686096 Chung Feb 2004 B1
6693840 Shimada et al. Feb 2004 B2
6700491 Shafer Mar 2004 B2
6706449 Mikhaylik et al. Mar 2004 B2
6709778 Johnson Mar 2004 B2
6713216 Kugai et al. Mar 2004 B2
6713389 Speakman Mar 2004 B2
6713987 Krasnov et al. Mar 2004 B2
6723140 Chu et al. Apr 2004 B2
6730423 Einhart et al. May 2004 B2
6733924 Skotheim et al. May 2004 B1
6737197 Chu et al. May 2004 B2
6737789 Radziemski et al. May 2004 B2
6741178 Tuttle May 2004 B1
6750156 Le et al. Jun 2004 B2
6751241 Davis et al. Jun 2004 B2
6752842 Luski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753108 Hampden-Smith et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753114 Jacobs et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760520 Medin et al. Jul 2004 B1
6764525 Whitacre et al. Jul 2004 B1
6768246 Pelrine et al. Jul 2004 B2
6768855 Bakke et al. Jul 2004 B1
6770176 Benson et al. Aug 2004 B2
6773848 Nortoft et al. Aug 2004 B1
6780208 Hopkins et al. Aug 2004 B2
6797428 Skotheim et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797429 Komatsu Sep 2004 B1
6805998 Jensen et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805999 Lee et al. Oct 2004 B2
6818356 Bates Nov 2004 B1
6822157 Fujioka Nov 2004 B2
6824922 Park et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827826 Demaray et al. Dec 2004 B2
6828063 Park et al. Dec 2004 B2
6828065 Munshi Dec 2004 B2
6830846 Kramlich et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835493 Zhang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6838209 Langan et al. Jan 2005 B2
6846765 Imamura et al. Jan 2005 B2
6849165 Kloppel et al. Feb 2005 B2
6852139 Zhang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6855441 Levanon Feb 2005 B1
6861821 Masumoto et al. Mar 2005 B2
6863699 Krasnov et al. Mar 2005 B1
6866901 Burrows et al. Mar 2005 B2
6866963 Seung et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869722 Kearl Mar 2005 B2
6884327 Pan et al. Apr 2005 B2
6886240 Zhang et al. May 2005 B2
6896992 Kearl May 2005 B2
6899975 Watanabe et al. May 2005 B2
6902660 Lee et al. Jun 2005 B2
6905578 Moslehi et al. Jun 2005 B1
6906436 Jenson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911667 Pichler et al. Jun 2005 B2
6916679 Snyder et al. Jul 2005 B2
6921464 Krasnov et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923702 Graff et al. Aug 2005 B2
6924164 Jenson Aug 2005 B2
6929879 Yamazaki Aug 2005 B2
6936377 Wensley et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936381 Skotheim et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936407 Pichler Aug 2005 B2
6949389 Pichler et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955986 Li Oct 2005 B2
6962613 Jenson Nov 2005 B2
6962671 Martin et al. Nov 2005 B2
6964829 Utsugi et al. Nov 2005 B2
6982132 Goldner et al. Jan 2006 B1
6986965 Jenson et al. Jan 2006 B2
6994933 Bates Feb 2006 B1
7022431 Shchori et al. Apr 2006 B2
7033406 Weir et al. Apr 2006 B2
7045246 Simburger et al. May 2006 B2
7045372 Ballantine et al. May 2006 B2
7056620 Krasnov et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073723 Fürst et al. Jul 2006 B2
7095372 Soler Castany et al. Aug 2006 B2
7129166 Speakman Oct 2006 B2
7131189 Jenson Nov 2006 B2
7144654 LaFollette et al. Dec 2006 B2
7144655 Jenson et al. Dec 2006 B2
7157187 Jenson Jan 2007 B2
7158031 Tuttle Jan 2007 B2
7162392 Vock et al. Jan 2007 B2
7183693 Brantner et al. Feb 2007 B2
7186479 Krasnov et al. Mar 2007 B2
7194801 Jenson et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198832 Burrows et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202825 Leizerovich et al. Apr 2007 B2
7205662 Narasimhan et al. Apr 2007 B2
7218809 Zhou et al. May 2007 B2
7220517 Park et al. May 2007 B2
7230321 McCain Jun 2007 B2
7238628 Demaray et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247408 Skotheim et al. Jul 2007 B2
7253494 Mino et al. Aug 2007 B2
7262131 Narasimhan et al. Aug 2007 B2
7265674 Tuttle Sep 2007 B2
7267904 Komatsu et al. Sep 2007 B2
7267906 Mizuta et al. Sep 2007 B2
7273682 Park et al. Sep 2007 B2
7274118 Jenson et al. Sep 2007 B2
7288340 Iwamoto Oct 2007 B2
7316867 Park et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323634 Speakman Jan 2008 B2
7332363 Edwards Feb 2008 B2
7335441 Luski et al. Feb 2008 B2
RE40137 Tuttle et al. Mar 2008 E
7340124 Patel et al. Mar 2008 B2
7345647 Rodenbeck Mar 2008 B1
7348099 Mukai et al. Mar 2008 B2
7378356 Zhang et al. May 2008 B2
7381657 Zhang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7389580 Jenson et al. Jun 2008 B2
7400253 Cohen Jul 2008 B2
7404877 Demaray et al. Jul 2008 B2
7410730 Bates Aug 2008 B2
7413998 Zhang et al. Aug 2008 B2
RE40531 Graff et al. Oct 2008 E
7468221 LaFollette et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469558 Demaray et al. Dec 2008 B2
7494742 Tarnowski et al. Feb 2009 B2
7544276 Zhang et al. Jun 2009 B2
7670724 Chan et al. Mar 2010 B1
7826702 Dawes Nov 2010 B2
7838133 Zhang et al. Nov 2010 B2
8045832 Pan et al. Oct 2011 B2
8076005 Demaray et al. Dec 2011 B2
8105466 Zhang et al. Jan 2012 B2
20010027159 Kaneyoshi Oct 2001 A1
20010031122 Lackritz et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032666 Jenson et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010033952 Jenson et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034106 Moise et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010041294 Chu et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041460 Wiggins Nov 2001 A1
20010050223 Gopalraja et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010052752 Ghosh et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010054437 Komori et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055719 Akashi et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020000034 Jenson Jan 2002 A1
20020001746 Jenson Jan 2002 A1
20020001747 Jenson Jan 2002 A1
20020004167 Jenson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020009630 Gao et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019296 Freeman et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020028377 Gross Mar 2002 A1
20020028555 Boyd et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020033330 Demaray et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037756 Jacobs et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048941 Kato et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020066539 Muller Jun 2002 A1
20020067615 Muller Jun 2002 A1
20020076133 Li et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091929 Ehrensvard Jul 2002 A1
20020093029 Ballantine et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020106297 Ueno et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020108649 Fujimori et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020115252 Haukka et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020134671 Demaray et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020139662 Lee Oct 2002 A1
20020140103 Kloster et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159245 Murasko et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161404 Schmidt Oct 2002 A1
20020164441 Amine et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170821 Sandlin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020170960 Ehrensvard et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030007718 Bazylenko Jan 2003 A1
20030019326 Han et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030022487 Yoon et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030024994 Ladyansky Feb 2003 A1
20030029493 Plessing Feb 2003 A1
20030035906 Memarian et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030036003 Shchori et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030042131 Johnson Mar 2003 A1
20030044665 Rastegar et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030048635 Knoerzer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063629 Davis et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030063883 Demaray et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030064292 Neudecker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030068559 Armstrong et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030077914 Le et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030079838 Brcka May 2003 A1
20030091904 Munshi May 2003 A1
20030095463 Shimada et al. May 2003 A1
20030097858 Strohhofer et al. May 2003 A1
20030109903 Berrang et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030127319 Demaray et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030134054 Demaray et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030141186 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030143853 Celii et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152829 Zhang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030162094 Lee et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030173207 Zhang et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030173208 Pan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174391 Pan et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175142 Milonopoulou et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030178623 Nishiki et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030178637 Chen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180610 Felde et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185266 Henrichs Oct 2003 A1
20030231106 Shafer Dec 2003 A1
20030232248 Iwamoto et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030234835 Torii et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040008587 Siebott et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040015735 Norman Jan 2004 A1
20040023106 Benson et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040028875 Van Rijn et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040029311 Snyder et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040038050 Saijo et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040043557 Haukka et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040048157 Neudecker et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040058237 Higuchi et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040077161 Chen et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078662 Hamel et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081415 Demaray et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081860 Hundt et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040085002 Pearce May 2004 A1
20040101761 Park et al. May 2004 A1
20040105644 Dawes Jun 2004 A1
20040106038 Shimamura et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040106046 Inda Jun 2004 A1
20040118700 Schierle-Arndt et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040126305 Chen et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151986 Park et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040161640 Salot Aug 2004 A1
20040175624 Luski et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040188239 Robison et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040208454 Montgomery et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040209159 Lee et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040219434 Benson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040245561 Sakashita et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040258984 Ariel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259305 Demaray et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050000794 Demaray et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050006768 Narasimhan et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050048802 Zhang et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070097 Barmak et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072458 Goldstein Apr 2005 A1
20050079418 Kelley et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050095506 Klaassen May 2005 A1
20050105231 Hamel et al. May 2005 A1
20050105853 Liu et al. May 2005 A1
20050110457 LaFollette et al. May 2005 A1
20050112461 Amine et al. May 2005 A1
20050118464 Levanon Jun 2005 A1
20050130032 Krasnov et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050133361 Ding et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050141170 Honda et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050142447 Nakai et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050147877 Tarnowski et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050158622 Mizuta et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050175891 Kameyama et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050176181 Burrows et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050181280 Ceder et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050183946 Pan et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050189139 Stole Sep 2005 A1
20050208371 Kim et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050225839 Patel et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239917 Nelson et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050266161 Medeiros et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060019504 Taussig Jan 2006 A1
20060021214 Jenson et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060040177 Onodera et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060046907 Rastegar et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060054496 Zhang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057283 Zhang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057304 Zhang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060063074 Jenson et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060071592 Narasimhan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060155545 Janye Jul 2006 A1
20060201583 Michaluk et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060210779 Weir et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060222954 Skotheim et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060234130 Inda Oct 2006 A1
20060237543 Goto et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060255435 Fuergut et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060286448 Snyder et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070009802 Lee et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070023275 Tanase et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070037058 Visco et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070053139 Zhang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070087230 Jenson et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091543 Gasse et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070125638 Zhang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070141468 Barker Jun 2007 A1
20070148065 Weir et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070148553 Weppner Jun 2007 A1
20070151661 Mao et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070164376 Burrows et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070166612 Krasnov et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070172681 Demaray et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070184345 Neudecker et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070196682 Visser et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070202395 Snyder et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070205513 Brunnbauer et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070210459 Burrows et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070224951 Gilb et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070263676 Beukema et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070264564 Johnson et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070278653 Brunnbauer et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070298326 Angell et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080003496 Neudecker et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080008936 Mizuta et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080014501 Skotheim et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080057397 Skotheim et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080107376 Patel et al. May 2008 A1
20080213672 Skotheim et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080233708 Hisamatsu Sep 2008 A1
20080254575 Fuergut et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080261107 Snyder et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080286651 Neudecker et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090181303 Neudecker et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100032001 Brantner Feb 2010 A1
20100086853 Venkatachalam et al. Apr 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (131)
Number Date Country
1415124 Apr 2003 CN
1471181 Jan 2004 CN
1532984 Sep 2004 CN
101073171 Sep 2010 CN
1756856 Oct 2011 CN
1826423 Nov 2011 CN
101511493 May 2012 CN
101931097 Nov 2012 CN
10 2005 014 427 Sep 2006 DE
10 2006 054 309 Nov 2006 DE
10 2008 016 665 Oct 2008 DE
10 2007 030 604 Jan 2009 DE
0 510 883 Oct 1992 EP
0 639 655 Feb 1995 EP
0 652 308 May 1995 EP
0 820 088 Jan 1998 EP
1 068 899 Jan 2001 EP
0 867 985 Feb 2001 EP
1 092 689 Apr 2001 EP
1 189 080 Mar 2002 EP
1 713 024 Oct 2006 EP
1825545 Nov 2009 EP
1597408 Dec 2012 EP
1633902 Dec 2012 EP
2 861 218 Apr 2005 FR
55-009305 Jan 1980 JP
56-156675 Dec 1981 JP
60-068558 Apr 1985 JP
61-60803 Mar 1986 JP
62-267944 Nov 1987 JP
62-287071 Dec 1987 JP
2-054764 Feb 1990 JP
2-230662 Sep 1990 JP
4-058456 Feb 1992 JP
4-072049 Mar 1992 JP
6-010127 Jan 1994 JP
6-100333 Apr 1994 JP
7-233469 May 1995 JP
7-224379 Aug 1995 JP
09-249962 Sep 1997 JP
11-204088 Jul 1999 JP
2000-144435 May 2000 JP
2000-188099 Jul 2000 JP
2000-268867 Sep 2000 JP
2001-259494 Sep 2001 JP
2001-297764 Oct 2001 JP
2001-328198 Nov 2001 JP
2002-344115 Nov 2002 JP
2003-17040 Jan 2003 JP
2003-073824 Mar 2003 JP
2003-234100 Aug 2003 JP
2003-347045 Dec 2003 JP
2004-071305 Mar 2004 JP
2004-149849 May 2004 JP
2004-158268 Jun 2004 JP
2004-273436 Sep 2004 JP
2004-335192 Nov 2004 JP
2005-256101 Sep 2005 JP
2002-203562 Jul 2012 JP
5095412 Dec 2012 JP
2002-0007881 Jan 2002 KR
2002-0017790 Mar 2002 KR
2002-0029813 Apr 2002 KR
2002-0038917 May 2002 KR
2003-0033913 May 2003 KR
2003-0042288 May 2003 KR
2003-0085252 Nov 2003 KR
10-1021536 Mar 2011 KR
2241281 Nov 2004 RU
478162 Mar 2002 TW
WO 9513629 May 1995 WO
WO 9623085 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9623217 Aug 1996 WO
WO 97027344 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9735044 Sep 1997 WO
WO 98047196 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9943034 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9957770 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0021898 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0022742 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0028607 May 2000 WO
WO 0036665 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0060682 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0060689 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0062365 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0101507 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0117052 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0124303 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0133651 May 2001 WO
WO 0139305 May 2001 WO
WO 0173864 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173865 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173866 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173868 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173870 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173883 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0173957 Oct 2001 WO
WO 0182390 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0186731 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0212932 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0242516 May 2002 WO
WO 0247187 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02071506 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02101857 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03003485 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03005477 Jan 2003 WO
WO 03026039 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03036670 May 2003 WO
WO 03069714 Aug 2003 WO
WO 03080325 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03083166 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004012283 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2004021532 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004061887 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004077519 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004086550 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004106581 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2004106582 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005008828 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005013394 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005024091 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005038957 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005067645 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005085138 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005091405 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2006063308 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006138362 Dec 2006 WO
WO 2007016781 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007027535 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007095604 Aug 2007 WO
WO 2008036731 Mar 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (392)
Entry
Machine Translation of JP 09-249962 to Arai et al. dated Sep. 22, 1997.
Kelly, P.J. et al., “A novel technique for the deposition of aluminum-doped zinc oxide films,” Thin Solid Films 426(1-2):111-116 (2003).
Snoeks, E. et al., “Cooperative upconversion in erbium-implanted soda-lime silicate glass optical waveguides,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12(8):1468-1474 (1995).
Response to Office Action filed on Oct. 17, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Final Office Action issued on Dec. 14, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Final Office Action filed Apr. 14, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Office Action mailed Apr. 27, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Office Action filed Jul. 27, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Notice of Allowance issued on Oct. 8, 2002, in U.S. Patent No. 6,533,907.
Response to Office Action filed Feb. 24, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Response to Office Action filed Jun. 12, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action mailed Sep. 6, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Response to Office Action filed on Dec. 21, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Office Action issued on Mar. 9, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response to Office Action filed on Aug. 9, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response to Office Action filed Mar. 2, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Final Office Action issued on May 19, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2006, from Korean Patent Office in Application No. 10-2005-7016055.
Office Action from Singapore Patent Office in Application No. 200505388-9, dated Mar. 20, 2006.
Response to Office Action from Singapore Patent Office in Application No. 200505388-9, dated Aug. 11, 2006.
Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2006, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,805.
Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Response to Office Action filed Jul. 26, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Voluntary Amendment filed Aug. 15, 2006, in TW Application No. 94143175.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US05/44781 dated Oct. 3, 2006.
Specification as filed Sep. 2, 2005, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT/US01/22750, dated Mar. 13, 2002.
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US01/22750, dated Jul. 19, 2002.
PCT Written Opinion for PCT/US01/22750, dated Jul. 23, 2002.
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US01/22750, dated Oct. 8, 2002.
Final Office Action issued on Feb. 14, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action issued on Feb. 13, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Response to Office Action filed on Jan. 3, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/650,461.
International Search Report mailed on Dec. 12, 2003 in PCT/US03/24809.
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report mailed Apr. 15, 2004 in PCT/US03/24809.
Specification and Preliminary Amendment as filed for U.S. Appl. No. 11/297,057.
International Search Report issued on Oct. 25, 2004 in PCT/US2004/005531.
Written Opinion issued on Oct. 25, 2004 in PCT/US2004/005531.
Response to Office Action filed Jan. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
PCT International Search Report of Application No. PCT/US2004/014524 dated Mar. 2, 2005.
PCT Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2004/014524, dated Mar. 2, 2005.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2004/014524, dated Dec. 8, 2005.
PCT International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2004/014523 dated Jan. 17, 2005.
PCT Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2004/014523 dated Jan. 17, 2005.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2004/014523, dated Dec. 8, 2005.
Hwang et al., “Characterization of sputter-deposited LiMn2O4 thin films for rechargeable microbatteries”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 141, No. 12, Dec. 1994, pp. 3296-3299.
Kim et al., “Characteristics of rapid-thermal-annealed LiCoO2 cathode film for an all-solid-state thin film microbattery”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 22, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2004, pp. 1182-1187.
EPO Extended Search Report dated Feb. 11, 2008, for EP Application No. 07120523.1.
EPO Extended Search Report dated Feb. 26, 2008, for EP Application No. 05853649.1.
Anh et al., “Significant Suppression of Leakage Current in (Ba,Sr)Tio3 Thin Films by Ni or Mn Doping,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 92, No. 5, pp. 2651-2654 (Sep. 2002).
Belkind, A. et al., “Pulsed-DC Reactive Sputtering of Dielectrics: Pulsing Parameter Effects,” 43rd Annual Technical Conference Proceedings.
Choy et al., “Eu-Doped Y2O3 Phosphor Films Produced by Electrostatic-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition,” J. Mater. Res., vol. 14, No. 7, pp. 3111-3114 (Jul. 1999).
Kim et al., “Correlation Between the Microstructures and the Cycling Performance of RuO2 Electrodes for Thin-Film Microsupercapacitors,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., vol. B 20(5), pp. 1827-1832 (Sep. 2002).
Park et al., “Characteristics of Pt Thin Film on the Conducting Ceramics TiO and Ebonex (Ti4O7) as Electrode Materials,” Thin Solid Films, 258, pp. 5-9 (1995).
Saha et al., “Large Reduction of Leakage Current by Graded-Layer La Doping in (Ba0.5, Sr0.5)TiO3 Thin Films,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 111-113 (Jul. 2001).
Scholl, R., “Power Supplies for Pulsed Plasma Technologies: State-of-the-Art and Outlook,” Advances Energy Industries, Inc., pp. 1-8 (1999).
Scholl, R., “Power Systems for Reactive Sputtering of Insulating Films,” Advances Energy Industries, Inc., pp. 1-8 (Aug. 2001).
Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 27, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Preliminary Amendment filed Sep. 16, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,834.
Corrected Preliminary Amendment filed Sep. 19, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Response to Final Office Action filed Aug. 3, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 23, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response to Final Office Action filed Nov. 3, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Office Action dated Nov. 8, 2006, to the Korean Patent Office in Application No. 10-2005-7016055.
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Office Action filed Dec. 6, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Continuation Application and Preliminary Amendment filed Dec. 13, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/638,680.
Response to Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,805.
International Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2006, for PCT Application No. PCT/US06/23143.
Response to Office Action filed Jan. 26, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Response to Office Action filed Feb. 6, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Supplementary Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 6, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,834.
Supplementary Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 6, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 21, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Response to Office Action and Terminal Disclaimer filed Mar. 1, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Voluntary Amendment dated Mar. 8, 2007, in TW Appl. No. 93114518.
Office Action dated Mar. 14, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 15, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Application and Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 22, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,972.
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 26, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,805.
Response to Office Action filed Mar. 30, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment dated Apr. 12, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment filed Apr. 23, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Final Office Action dated May 2, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action dated May 21, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Office Communication with Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 7, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,805.
Issue Notification dated Jun. 13, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Cocorullo, G. et al., “Amorphous silicon waveguides and light modulators for integrated photonics realized by low-temperature plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor deposition,” Optics Lett. 21(24):2002-2004 (1996).
Kelly, P.J. et al., “A novel technique for the deposition of aluminum-doped zinc oxide films”, Thin Solid Films 426(1-2):111-116 (2003).
Tomaszewski, H. et al., “Yttria-stabilized zirconia thin films grown by reactive r.f magnetron sputtering,” Thin Solid Films 287:104-109 (1996).
Office Action issued Nov. 28, 2001, for US Patent No. 6,506,289.
Response to Office Action filed Feb. 20, 2002, for US Patent No. 6,506,289.
Office Action issued Apr. 17, 2002, for US Patent No. 6,506,289.
Response to Office Action filed Jul. 17, 2002, for US Patent No. 6,506,289.
Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 6, 2002, for US Patent No. 6,506,289.
Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 10, 2003 for US Patent No. 6,827,826.
Response to Office Action filed Feb. 28, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Final Office Action mailed May 8, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Response to Office Action filed Feb. 17, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/100,856.
Final Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/100,856.
Response to Office Action filed on Dec. 21, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response to Office Action filed on May 15, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Office Action issued on Mar. 23, 2006, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/650,461.
Response to Office Action filed Mar. 2, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Final Office Action issued on May 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Office Action from Singapore Patent Office in Appl. No. 200505388-9, dated Mar. 20, 2006.
Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Affinito, J.D. et al., “PML/oxide/PML Barrier Layer Performance Differences Arising from Use of UV or Electron Beam Polymerization of the PML Layers,” Thin Solid Films 308-309:19-25 (1997).
Affinito, J.D. et al., “Polymer-Oxide Transparent Barrier Layers,” Society of Vacuum Coaters, 39th Ann. Technical Conference Proceedings, May 5-10, 1996, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 392-397 (1996).
Alder, T. et al., “High-Efficiency Fiber-to-Chip Coupling Using Low-Loss Tapered Single-Mode Fiber,” IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett. 12(8):1016-1018 (2000).
Almeida, V.R. et al., “Nanotaper for compact mode conversion,” Optics Letters 28(15):1302-1304 (2003).
Asghari, M. and Dawnay, E., “ASOC™—A Manufacturing Integrated Optics Technology,” SPIE 3620:252-262 (Jan. 1999).
Barbier, D. et al, “Amplifying Four-Wavelength Combiner, Based on Erbium/Ytterbium-Doped Waveguide Amplifiers and Integrated Splitters,” IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett..9:315-317 (1997).
Barbier, D., “Performances and potential applications of erbium doped planar waveguide amplifiers and lasers,” Proc. OAA, Victoria, BC, Canada, pp. 58-63 (Jul. 21-23, 1997).
Beach R.J., “Theory and optimization of lens ducts,” Applied Optics 35(12):2005-2015 (1996).
Belkind, A. et al., “Using pulsed direct current power for reactive sputtering of Al2O3,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17(4):1934-1940 (1999).
Bestwick, T., “ASOC198 silicon integrated optics technology,” SPIE 3631:182-190 (1999).
Borsella, E. et al., “Structural incorporation of silver in soda-lime glass by the ion-exchange process: a photoluminescence spectroscopy study,” Applied Physics A 71:125-132 (2000).
Byer, R.L., “Nonlinear Optics and Solid-state Lasers: 2000,” IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 6(6):911-930 (2000).
Campbell, S.A. et al., “Titanium dioxide (TiO2)-based gate insulators,” IBM J. Res. Develop. 43(3):383-392 (1999).
Chang, C.Y. and Sze, S.M. (Eds.), in: ULSI Technology, The McGraw-Hill Companies,.Inc., New York, Chapter 4, pp. 169-170, and 226-231 (1996).
Chen, G. et al. “Development of Supported Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochemical Society 149(8):A1092-A1099 (2002).
Choi, Y.B. et al., “Er-Al-codoped silicate planar light waveguide-type amplifier fabricated by radio-frequency sputtering,” Optics Letters 25(4):263-265 (2000).
Cooksey, K. et al. “Predicting Permeability & Transmission Rate for Multilayer Materials,” Food Technology 53(9):60-63 (1999).
Crowder, M.A. et al., “Low-Temperature Single-Crystal Si TFT's Fabricated on Si Films Processed via Sequential Lateral Solidification,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 19(8):306-308 (1998).
Delavaux, J-M. et al., “Integrated optics erbium ytterbium amplifier system in 10Gb/s fiber transmission experiment,” 22nd European Conference on Optical Communication, Oslo, I.123-I.126 (1996).
Distributed Energy Resources: Fuel Cells, Projects, 4 pages http://www.eere.energy.gov/der/fuel—cells/projects.html (2003).
Dorey, R.A., “Low temperature micromoulding of functional ceramic devices,” Grant summary for GR/S84156/01 for the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, 2 pages (2004).
DuPont Teijin Films, Mylar 200 SBL 300, Product Information, 4 pages (2000).
Electrometals Technologies Limited, Financial Report for 2002, Corporate Directory, Chairman's Review, Review of Operations, 10 pages (2002).
E-Tek website: FAQ, Inside E-Tek, E-Tek News, Products; http://www.etek-inc.com/, 10 pages (2003).
Flytzanis, C. et al, “Nonlinear Optics in Composite Materials,” in: Progress in Optics XXIX, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 323-425 (1991).
Frazao, O. et al., “EDFA Gain Flattening Using Long-Period Fibre Gratings Based on the Electric Arc Technique,” Proc. London Comm. Symp. 2001, London, England, 3 pages (2001).
Fujii, M. et al., “1.54 μm photoluminescence of Er3+ doped into SiO2 films containing Si nanocrystals: Evidence for energy transfer from Si nanocrystals for Er3+,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(9):1198-1200 (1997).
Garcia, C. et al. “Size Dependence of Lifetime and Absorption Cross Section of Si Nanocrystals Embedded in SiO2,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(10):1595-1597 (2003).
Goossens, A. et al., “Sensitization of TiO2 with p-type semiconductor polymers,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 287:148 (1998).
Greene, J.E. et al., “Morphological and electrical properties of rf sputtered Y2O3-doped ZrO2 thin films,” J. Vac. Sci. Tech. 13(1):72-75 (1976).
Han, H.-S. et al. “Optical Gain at 1.54 μm in Erbium-Doped Silicon Nanocluster Sensitized Waveguide,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(27):4568-4570 (2001).
Hayakawa, T. et al., “Enhanced fluorescence from Eu3+ owing to surface plasma oscillation of silver particles in glass,” J. Non-Crystalline Solids 259:16-22 (1999).
Hayakawa, T. et al, “Field enhancement effect of small Ag particles on the fluorescence from Eu3+-doped SiO2 glass,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 74(11):1513-1515 (1999).
Hayfield, P.C.S., in: Development of a New Material-Monolithic Ti4O7 Ebonix® Ceramic, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, Table of Contents, 4 pages (2002).
Hehlen, M.P. et al. “Spectroscopic Properties of Er3+- and Yb3+-doped Soda-Lime Silicate and Aluminosilicate Glasses,” Physical Review B 56(15):9302-9318 (1997).
Hehlen, M.P. et al. “Uniform Upconversion in High-Concentration Er3+-doped Soda Lime Silicate and Aluminosilicate Glasses,” Optics Letters 22(11):772-774 (1997).
Horst, F. et al., “Compact, Tunable Optical Devices in Silicon-Oxynitride Waveguide Technology,” Top. Meeting Integrated Photonics Res. '00, Quebec, Canada, p. IThF1, 3 pages (2000).
Howson, R.P., “The reactive sputtering of oxides and nitrides,” Pure & Appl. Chem. 66(6):1311-1318 (1994).
Hubner, J. and Guldberg-Kjaer, S., “Planar Er-and Yb-Doped Amplifiers and Lasers,” COM Technical University of Denmark, 10th European Conf. On Integrated Optics, Session WeB2, pp. 71-74 (2001).
Hwang, M-S. et al., “The effect of pulsed magnetron sputtering on the properties of indium tin oxide thin films,” Surface and Coatings Tech. 171:29-33 (2003).
Im, J.S. et al. “Controlled Super-Lateral Growth of Si Films for Microstructural Manipulation and Optimization,” Physica Status Solidi (A) 166(2):603-617 (1998).
Im, J.S. and Sposili, R.S., “Crystalline Si Films for Integrated Active-Matrix Liquid Crystal Displays,” MRS Bulletin, pp. 39-48 (1996).
Im, J.S. et al., “Single-crystal Si films for thin-film transistor devices,” Appl. Physics Lett. 70(25):3434-3436 (1997).
Itoh, M. et al., “Large reduction of singlemode-fibre coupling loss in 1.5% Δ planar lightwave circuits using spot-size converters,” Electronics Letters 38(2):72-74 (2002).
Jackson, M.K. and Movassaghi, M., “An Accurate Compact EDFA Model,” Eur. Conf. Optical Comm., Munich, Germany, 2 pages (2000).
Janssen, R. et al. “Photoinduced electron transfer from conjugated polymers onto nanocrystalline TiO2,” Synthet. Metal., 1 page (1999).
Johnson, J.E. et al., “Monolithically Integrated Semiconductor Optical Amplifier and Electroabsorption Modulator with Dual-Waveguide Spot-Size Converter Input,” IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 6(1):19-25 (2000).
Jonsson L.B. et al. “Frequency response in pulsed DC reactive sputtering processes,” Thin Solid Films 365:43-48 (2000).
Kato, K. and Inoue, Y., “Recent progress on PLC hybrid integration,” SPIE. 3631:28-36 (1999).
Kato, K. and Tohmori, Y., “PLC Hybrid Integration Technology and Its Application to Photonic Components,” IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 6(1):4-13 (2000).
Kelly, P.J. et al., “Reactive pulsed magnetron sputtering process for alumina films,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18(6):2890-2896 (2000).
Kelly, P.J. and Arnell, R.D., “Control of the structure and properties of aluminum oxide coatings deposited by pulsed magnetron sputtering,” J Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17(3):945-953 (1999).
Kik, P.G. and Polman, A., “Gain Limiting Processes in Er-doped Si Nanocrystal Waveguides in SiO2,” J. Appl. Phys. 91(1):534-536 (2002).
Kim, H-K. et al., “Characteristics of rapid-thermal-annealed LiCoO2 cathode film for an all-solid-state thin film microbattery,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 22(4):1182-1187 (2004).
Kim, J-Y. et al. “Frequency-dependent pulsed direct current magnetron sputtering of titanium oxide films,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 19(2):429-434 (2001).
Kim, D-W. et al. “Mixture Behavior and Microwave Dielectric Properties in the Low-fired TiO2-CuO System,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 39:2696-2700 (2000).
Ladouceur, F. and Love, J.D., in: Silica-based Buried Channel Waveguides and Devices, Chapman & Hall, London, Table of Contents, 6 pages (1996).
Ladouceur, F. et al., “Effect of side wall roughness in buried channel waveguides,” IEEE Proc. Optoelectron. 141(4):242-248 (1994).
Lamb, W.B., “Designing Nonfoil Containing Skins for VIP Applications,” DuPont VIA Symposium Presentation, 35 pages (1999).
Lamb, W. and Zeiler, R., “Designing Non-Foil Containing Skins for Vacuum Insulation Panel (VIP) Applications,” Vuoto XXVIII(1-2):55-58 (1999).
Lange, M.R. et al, “High Gain Ultra-Short Length Phosphate glass Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifier Material,” OSA Optical Fiber Communications (OFC), 3 pages (2002).
Laporta, P. et al, “Diode-pumped cw bulk Er:Yb:glass laser,” Optics Letters 16(24):1952-1954 (1991).
Laurent-Lund, C. et al., “PECVD Grown Multiple Core Planar Waveguides with Extremely Low Interface Reflections and Losses,” IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett. 10(10):1431-1433 (1998).
Lee, K.K. et al., “Effect of size and roughness on light transmission in a Si/SiO2 waveguide: Experiments and model,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 77(11):1617-1619 (2000).
Lee, B.H. et al., “Effects of interfacial layer growth on the electrical characteristics of thin titanium oxide films on silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 74(21):3143-3145 (1999).
Love, J.D. et al., “Quantifying Loss Minimisation in Single-Mode Fibre Tapers,” Electronics Letters 22(17):912-914 (1986).
Mardare, D. and Rusu, G.I., “On the structure of Titanium Oxide Thin Films,” Analele Stiintifice Ale Universitatii IASI, Romania, pp. 201-208 (1999).
Marques, P.V.S. et al., “Planar Silica-on-Silicon Waveguide Lasers Based in Two Layer Core Devices,” 10th European Conference on Integrated Optics, Session WeB2, pp. 79-82 (2001).
Meijerink, A. et al, “Luminescence of Ag+ in Crystalline and Glassy SrB407,” J. Physics Chem. Solids 54(8):901-906 (1993).
Mesnaoui, M. et al, “Spectroscopic properties of Ag+ ions in phosphate glasses of NaPO3- AgPO3 system,” Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 29:1001-1013 (1992).
Mitomi, O. et al., “Design of a Single-Mode Tapered Waveguide for Low-Loss Chip-to-Fiber Coupling,” IEEE J. Quantum Electronics 30(8):1787-1793 (1994).
Mizuno, Y. et al. “Temperature dependence of oxide decomposition on titanium surfaces in UHV,” J. Vac. Sci. & Tech. A 20(5):1716-1721 (2002).
Ohkubo, H. et al., “Polarization-Insensitive Arrayed-Waveguide Grating Using Pure SiO2 Cladding,” Fifth Optoelectronics and Communication Conference (OECC 2000) Technical Digest, pp. 366-367 (2000).
Ohmi, S. et al., “Rare earth metal oxides for high-K gate insulator,” VLSI Design 2004, 1 page (2004).
Ohtsuki, T. et al., “Gain Characteristics of a high concentration Er3+-doped phosphate glass waveguide,” J. Appl. Phys. 78(6):3617-3621 (1995).
Ono, H. et al., “Design of a Low-loss Y-branch Optical Waveguide,” Fifth Optoelectronic and Communications Conference (OECC 2000) Technical Digest, pp. 502-503 (2000).
Padmini, P. et al. “Realization of High Tunability Barium Strontium Titanate Thin Films by rf Magnetron Sputtering,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(20):3186-3188 (1999).
Pan, T. et al., “Planar Er3+-doped aluminosilicate waveguide amplifier with more than 10 dB gain across C-band,” Optical Society of America, 3 pages (2000).
Peters, D.P. et al., “Formation mechanism of silver nanocrystals made by ion irradiation of Na+⇄Ag+ ion-exchanged sodalime silicate glass,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 168:237-244 (2000).
Rajarajan, M. et al., “Numerical Study of Spot-Size Expanders for an Efficient OEIC to SMF Coupling,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 10(8):1082-1084 (1998).
Ramaswamy, R.V. et al., “Ion-Exchanged Glass Waveguides: a Review,” J. Lightwave Technology 6(6):984-1002 (1988).
Roberts, S.W. et al., “The Photoluminescence of Erbium-doped Silicon Monoxide,” University of Southampton, Department of Electronics and Computer Science Research Journal, 7 pages (1996).
Sanyo Vacuum Industries Co., Ltd. Products Info, TiO2, (2003), 1 page http://www.sanyovac.co.jp/Englishweb/products/ETiO2.htm.
Schermer, R. et al., “Investigation of Mesa Dielectric Waveguides,” Proceedings of the OSA Integrated Photonics Research Topical Meeting and Exhibit, Paper No. IWB3, 3 pages (2001).
Schiller, S. et al. “PVD Coating of Plastic Webs and Sheets with High Rates on Large Areas,” European Materials Research Society 1999 Spring Meeting, Jun. 1-4, 1999, Strasbourg, France, 13 pages (1999).
Second International Symposium of Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Preliminary Program, 13 pages (1999).
Seventh International Conference on TiO2 Photocatalysis: Fundamentals & Applications, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Final Program, 7 pages (Nov. 17-21, 2002).
Sewell, P. et al., “Rib Waveguide Spot-Size Transformers: Modal Properties,” J. Lightwave Technology 17(5):848-856 (1999).
Shaw, D.G. et al., “Use of Vapor Deposited Acrylate Coatings to Improve the Barrier Properties of Metallized Film,” Society of Vacuum Coaters, 37th Annual Technical Conference Proceedings, pp. 240-244 (1994).
Shin, J.C. et al. “Dielectric and Electrical Properties of Sputter Grown (Ba,Sr)TiO3 Thin Films,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(1):506-513 (1999).
Shmulovich, J. et al., “Recent progress in Erbium-doped waveguide amplifiers,” Bell Laboratories, pp. 35-37 (1999).
Slooff, L.H. et al, “Optical properties of Erbium-doped organic polydentate cage complexes,” J. Appl. Phys. 83(1):497-503 (1998).
Smith, R.E. et al., “Reduced Coupling Loss Using a Tapered-Rib Adiabatic-Following Fiber Coupler,” IEEE Photonics Technology Lett. 8(8):1052-1054 (1996).
Strohhofer, C. and Polman, A. “Energy transfer to Er3+ in Ag ion-exchanged glass,” FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, 10 pages (2001).
Sugiyama, A. et al., “Gas Permeation Through the Pinholes of Plastic Film Laminated with Aluminium Foil,” Vuoto XXVIII(1-2):51-54 (1999).
Tervonen, A., “Challenges and opportunities for integrated optics in optical networks,” SPIE 3620:2-11 (1999).
Ting, C.Y. et al., “Study of planarized sputter-deposited SiO2,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol, 15(3):1105-1112 (1978).
Treichel, O. and Kirchhoff, V., “The influence of pulsed magnetron sputtering on topography and crystallinity of TiO2 films on glass,” Surface and Coatings Technology 123:268-272 (2000).
Tukamoto, H. and West, A.R., “Electronic Conductivity of LiCoOs and Its Enhancement by Magnesium Doping,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 144(9):3164-3168 (1997).
Van Dover, R.B., “Amorphous Lanthanide-Doped TiOx Dielectric Films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 74(20):3041-3043 (1999).
Viljanen, J. and Leppihalme, M., “Planar Optical Coupling Elements for Multimode Fibers with Two-Step Ion Migration Process,” Applied Physics 24(1):61-63 (1981).
Villegas, M.A. et al., “Optical spectroscopy of a soda lime glass exchanged with silver,” Phys. Chem. Glasses 37(6):248-253 (1996).
Von Rottkay, K. et al., “Influence of stoichiometry on electrochromic cerium-titanium oxide compounds,” Presented at the 11th Int'l. Conference of Solid State Ionics, Honolulu, Hawaii, Nov. 19, 1997, Published in Solid State Ionics 113-115:425-430. (1998).
Westlinder, J. et al., “Simulation and Dielectric Characterization of Reactive dc Magnetron Cosputtered (Ta2O5)1-x(TiO2)x Thin Films,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 20(3):855-861 (May/Jun. 2002).
Wilkes, K.E., “Gas Permeation Through Vacuum Barrier Films and its Effect on VIP Thermal Performance,” presented at the Vacuum Insulation Panel Symp., Baltimore, Maryland, 21 pages (May 3, 1999).
Yanagawa, H. et al., “Index-and-Dimensional Taper and Its Application to Photonic Devices,” J. Lightwave Technology 10(5):587-591 (1992).
Yoshikawa, K. et al., “Spray formed aluminum alloys for sputtering targets,” Powder Metallurgy 43(3):198-199 (2000).
Zhang, H. et al. “High Dielectric Strength, High k TiO2 Films by Pulsed DC, Reactive Sputter Deposition,” 5 pages (2001).
Office Action issued on Sep. 27, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Office Action filed on Mar. 14, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Office Action issued on Jun. 15, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Office Action filed on Oct. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Office Action issued on May 2, 2002 in U.S. Patent No. 6,533,907.
Response to Office Action filed on Sep. 3, 2002 in U.S. Patent No. 6,533,907.
Office Action issued on Feb. 12, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Response to Office Action filed on Aug. 10, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Office Action issued on Sep. 10, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Amendment/RCE filed on Mar. 10, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Office Action issued on Mar. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Response to Office Action filed on Jun. 17, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Office Action issued on Jul. 8, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Office Action issued on Nov. 28, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 09/903,081.
Office Action issued on May 14, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,492.
Response to Office Action filed on Aug. 14, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,492.
Office Action issued on Sep. 3, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,492.
Response to Office Action filed on Mar. 3, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,492.
Office Action issued Sep. 21, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/100,856.
Office Action issued on Feb. 24, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Response to Office Action filed on Jul. 23, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action issued on Oct. 6, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action dated Jan. 13, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Response to Office Action filed on Jun. 10, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action issued on Aug. 4, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Response to Office Action filed Dec. 5, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2005, received in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response Office Action filed on Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Office Action issued on Oct. 25, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Office Action issued on Oct. 22, 2003 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Response to Office Action filed on Feb. 23, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Office Action issued on Jun. 10, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Response to Office Action filed on Dec. 8, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Office Action issued on Aug. 8, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Response to Office Action filed on Nov. 8, 2005, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,341.
Office Action issued on May 4, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,493.
Office Action issued on Oct. 3, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/650,461.
Office Action issued on Mar. 14, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Office Action issued on Dec. 2, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/789,953.
Office Action issued on Mar. 24, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Response to Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Office Action issued on Oct. 19, 2005 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/851,542.
Lee, W.J. et al. “Optimizing indium tin oxide thin films with bipolar d.c.-pulsed magnetron sputtering for electrochromic device applications”, J. Mater. Sci: Mat in Elec. 13:751-756 (2002).
Mientus, R. et al., “Reactive magnetron sputtering of tin-doped indium oxide (ITO): influence of argon pressure and plasma excitation mode”, Surface and Coatings Tech. 142-144:748-754 (2001).
Response to Office Action dated Nov. 21, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 4, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/291,179.
Response to Final Office Action filed Oct. 2, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Response to Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 25, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/101,863.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Amendment/Rce filed Oct. 24, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Response to Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 1, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/954,182.
Office Action dated May 29, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,834.
Response to Office Action filed Sep. 29, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,834.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 30, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,834.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 23, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,834.
Preliminary Amendment dated Mar. 11, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,717.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 2, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,717.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 17, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,717.
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Amendment and Response to Office Action filed Sep. 30, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Nov. 9, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Response to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment filed Dec. 9, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment mailed Jan. 25, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Response to Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment filed Feb. 24, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 5, 2007, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/228,805.
First Office Action dated Jul. 25, 2008 from the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480005515.5. Translation.
Response to First Office Action filed Feb. 9, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480005515.5. Translation.
Decision for Allowance for Registration dated Feb. 1, 2007, in Application No. 10-2005-7016055. Translation.
Certificate of Grant of Patent dated Sep. 28, 2007, in Application No. 200505388-9.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 15, 2005, in PCT/US2004/005531.
Office Action mailed Mar. 2, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,972.
First Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2008, from the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480021078.6.
Response to first Office Action filed Jun. 18, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C., in Appl. No. CN200480021078.6.
Second Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2009, from the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C., in Appl. No. CN200480021078.6.
Response to second Office Action filed Dec. 29, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480021078.6.
Rejection Decision mailed Feb. 5, 2010, from the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C., in Appl. No. 200480021078.6.
Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Response to Office Action filed Jun. 16, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Supplemental Amendment filed Jun. 27, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Supplemental Final Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Amendment After Final filed Apr. 15, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Office Action mailed Apr. 30, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Amendment in Response to Office Action filed Oct. 28, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Supplemental Final Office Action mailed Apr. 21, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
First Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2008 from the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480020874.8.
Response to First Office Action filed Jan. 12, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480020874.8.
Second Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2009, from the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C. in Appl. No. 200480020874.8.
Response to second Office Action filed Dec. 29, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200480020874.8.
First Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2008 from the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Response to First Office Action filed Feb. 2, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Second Office Action dated May 8, 2009, from the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Response to Second Office Action filed Sep. 22, 2009, with the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C., in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Third Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2010, from the State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Examination Report dated Jul. 24, 2008, for EP Application No. 05853649.1.
Response to Examination Report filed Feb. 3, 2009, for EP Application No. 05853649.1.
Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC—Intent to Grant dated May 27, 2009, in EP Appl. No. 05853649.1.
Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2008 from the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) in Appl. No. 94143175.
Response to Office Action filed May 5, 2009, with the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) in Appl. No. 94143175.
Written Primary Decision of Rejection dated Jan. 6, 2010, from the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) in Appl. No. 94143175.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 21, 2007, in PCT/US05/044781.
Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Response to Office Action filed Jun. 30, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Final Office Action dated Oct. 30, 2008, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Amendment/Rce filed Apr. 30, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Amendment in Response to Office Action filed Dec. 8, 2009, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 23, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Written Opinion mailed Apr. 3, 2009, from the Australian Patent Office in SG Appl. No. 200801749-3.
Response to Written Opinion filed Dec. 11, 2009, with the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore, in SG Appl. No. 200801749-3.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US06/33315 mailed Feb. 28, 2008.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US06/33315 mailed Mar. 19, 2009.
Final Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Amendment with RCE filed Jul. 26, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Office Action and IPO Search Report dated May 31, 2010, in Application No. 93114493.
Response to Office Action filed Aug. 30, 2010, in Application No. 93114493.
Amendment and Response to Office Action filed Jun. 2, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,972.
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 26, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,972.
Appeal to Rejection Decision with filing of Request for Re-Examination filed May 18, 2010, in Appl. No. 200480021078.6.
Amendment After Final filed Jul. 9, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Advisory Action mailed Jul. 29, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Supplemental Amendment After Final filed Aug. 23, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 10/850,968.
Office Action and IPO Search Report dated Aug. 10, 2010, in TW Appl. No. 93114518.
Response to Third Office Action filed Apr. 9, 2010, in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Notification of Grant of Invention Patent Right and Notification for Completion of Formalities for Registration issued Jun. 11, 2010, in Appl. No. 200580042305.8.
Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2010, in Korean Appl. No. 10-2007-7014536.
Response to Office Action filed Aug. 23, 2010, in Korean Appl. No. 10-2007-7014536.
Statement of Reasons for Re-Examination filed Jun. 29, 2010, in Appl. No. 94143175.
Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 22, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,652.
Final Examination Report dated Mar. 25, 2010, in SG Appl. No. 200801749-3.
Certificate of Grant of Patent dated Aug. 31, 2010, in SG Appl. No. 200801749-3.
Abraham, K.M. et al., “Inorganic-organic composite solid polymer electrolytes, ” vol. 147(4) J. Electrochem. Soc., pp. 1251-1256 (2000).
Abrahams, I., “Li6Zr2O7, a new anion vacancy ccp based structure, determined by ab initio powder diffraction methods,” vol. 104,J. Solid State Chem., pp. 397-403 (1993).
Amatucci, G., et al., “Lithium scandium phosphate-based electrolytes for solid state lithium rechargeable microbatteries,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 60, pp. 357-365 (1993).
Appetecchi, G.B., et al., “Composite polymer electrolytes with improved lithium metal electrode interfacial properties,” vol. 145(12),J. Electrochem. Soc., pp. 4126-4132 (1998), December.
Bates, J.B., et al., “Electrical properties of amorphous lithium electrolyte thin films,”, 53-56 Solid State Ionics, pp. 647-654 (1992).
Bates et al., “Thin-Film Lithium Batteries”, New Trends in Electrochemical Technology: Energy Storage Systems for Electronics, T. Osaka & M. Datta Eds. Gordon and Breach, 2000.
Delmas, C., et al., “Des conducteurs ioniques pseudo-bidimensionnels Li8MO6 (M=Zr, Sn), Li7LO6 (L=Nb, Ta) et Li6In2O6,” Mat. Res. Bull., vol. 14, pp. 619-625 (1979).
Hu, Y-W., et al., “Ionic conductivity of lithium phosphate-doped lithium orthosilicate,” Mat. Res. Bull., vol. 11, pp. 1227-1230 (1976), June.
Jones et al., “A Thin Film Solid State Microbattery,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 628, pp. 53-56 (1992).
Mattox, Handbook of Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) Processing, Society of Vacuum Coaters, Albuquerque, New Mexico 660f and 692ff, Noyes Publications (1998).
Neudecker, B., et al., “Li9SiAlO8: a lithium ion electrolyte for voltages above 5.4 V,” Electrochem. Soc., vol. 143(7), pp. 2198-2203 (1996), July.
Ohno, H., et al., “Electrical conductivity of a sintered pellet of octalithium zirconate,” J. Nucl. Mat., vol. 132, p. 222-230 (1985), March.
Sarro, P., “Silicon Carbide as a New MEMS Technology,” Sensors and Actuators, vol. 82, pp. 210-218 (2000).
Scholder, V., et al., “Über Zirkonate, Hafnate und Thorate von Barium, Strontium, Lithium und Natrium,” Zeitschrift für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, Band 362, pp. 149-168 (1968).
Wang, B., et al., “Characterization of Thin-Film Rechargeable Lithium Batteries with Lithium Cobalt Oxide Cathodes”, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 143, pp. 3203-3213 (1996), October.
Yu, X., et al., “A stable thin-film lithium electrolyte: lithium phosphorous oxynitride,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 144(2), pp. 524-532 (1997), February.
International Search Report mailed Feb. 14, 2008, in related International Application No. PCT/US06/46370.
First Examination Report dated Sep. 2, 2010, in European Patent Appl. No. 04715009.9.
Allowance Decision of Examination dated Sep. 17, 2010, in Taiwan Application No. 93114493.
Amendment After Final filed Oct. 26, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,972.
Advisory Action mailed Nov. 3, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/726,972.
Response to Office Action filed Nov. 11, 2010, in Taiwan Appl. No. 93114518.
Allowance Decision of Examination dated Dec. 13, 2010, in Taiwan Appl. No. 93114518.
Decision for Allowance of Registration dated Dec. 8, 2010, in Korean Appl. No. 10-2007-7014536.
Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2010, in Taiwan Appl. No. 94143175.
Office Action mailed Feb. 8, 2010, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Amendment and Response to Final Office Action filed May 10, 2010, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Final Office Action mailed Aug. 2, 2010, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Response to Final Office Action filed Oct. 4, 2010, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Advisory Action mailed Oct. 22, 2010, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Response to Final Office Action filed Nov. 29, 2010, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 20, 2011, in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,383.
Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2011, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/191,643.
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion mailed Jan. 12, 2011, in European Appl. No. 06790009.2.
Bouwman et al., “Influence of Diffusion Plane Orientation on Electrochemical Properties of Thin Film LiCoO2 Electrodes”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 149 (6) A699-A709 (2002).
Kim et al., “Electrochemical Stability of Thin-Film LiCoO2 Cathodes by Aluminum-Oxide Coating”, Chem. Mater., 15, 1505-1511 (2003).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060134522 A1 Jun 2006 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60651363 Feb 2005 US
60634818 Dec 2004 US