The present invention is directed in general to a method for manufacturing a microelectronics device, and more specifically, to a method of detecting an endpoint during a removal process of a material from a microelectronics substrate by detecting luminescence signals.
In the fabrication of microelectronic components, it is well known that various devices are formed in dielectric layers located over a base substrate, such as silicon. These devices are conventionally formed by first lithographically forming openings in the dielectric layers and then depositing a conductive metal, such as aluminum, tungsten or copper within the openings. The metal is typically deposited in such a way as to leave an excess amount on top of the dielectric layer, which is sometimes referred to as “overburden.” This overburden metal must be removed to properly expose the underlying metal filled interconnects or contact openings.
Typically this overburden is removed by a well known process called chemical mechanical planarization (CMP). CMP is also used to planarize or flatten surface topography. It is desirable that all layers have a smooth surface topography, since it is difficult to lithographically image and pattern layers applied to non-uniform surfaces. Moreover, the non-planarity that occurs at one level can be reflected in layers deposited over it, which potentially propagates and amplifies the non-planarity at each successive level. Typically, a given microelectronics wafer may be planarized several times during the fabrication process. Thus, planarization is very important in achieving a high quality microelectronics device.
The point at which to cease the CMP process, which is referred to as the endpoint, is also of great concern within the microelectronics fabrication industry. If the overburden is not sufficiently removed, the circuit will be shorted and fail. On the other hand, if too much over-polish of the dielectric layer and the interconnect or contact structures occurs, the electrical properties of the integrated circuit can be detrimentally affected. For example, sheet resistance or parasitic capacitance may increase, thereby affecting device speed.
To overcome these problems, the industry has developed endpoint detection methods. One such method is an optical method that involves reflecting light off of the polished side of a microelectronics wafer during the polishing process. In many of these optical processes, a beam of light that has a given wavelength is projected through a window formed through the underside of a polishing platen. As the wafer rotates around, the light is projected through the window and reflected off the polished surface of the wafer at the same given wavelength. These optical methods depend on detecting a change in the intensity of the light that is reflected off the polished surface of the wafer. Often such light is also refracted by transparent films on the surface of the wafer and reflected back, causing interference patterns which enables estimation of remaining film thickness. When polishing metal overburden, the metal is highly reflective and has a much stronger reflective intensity than does the underlying dielectric material. Thus, when the metal is removed, ideally, the reflective intensity changes, thereby, indicating an endpoint, i.e. removal, of the overburden of metal.
Unfortunately, however, these optical methods suffer from certain drawbacks. For example, the optical methods can produce sporadic results, usually due to pattern density and orientation, or due to the interference mentioned above, and thus, is not always consistent in indicating the endpoint or total removal of the metal. In addition, a false intensity change may also occur from a polished region where the metal removal has progressed to such an extent that the metal becomes transparently thin. In such instances, an intensity change may be detected even though the metal still remains. Also, in those instances where the underlying material is similar to the material overlying it, it can be very difficult to detect a change in reflective intensity.
Another method for endpoint detection involves measurement of change in Eddy Current during metal removal. The level of Eddy Current is proportional to metal thickness. The Eddy current signal will become very small nearest to endpoint, impacting its usefulness; current detected in the remaining desired metal overshadows the loss from the newly cleared area.
Another common endpoint system involves monitoring of motor current. Changes in current occur when the friction changes as one film begins to clear and the underlying film is exposed to the polishing process. Partial metal removal makes it difficult to trigger this endpoint system, causing over-polish.
Accordingly, what is needed in the art is a method and system for more accurately detecting an endpoint of a removal of material from a microelectronics substrate.
To overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, the present invention, in one embodiment, provides a method of detecting an endpoint of the removal of a material from a microelectronics substrate. This embodiment comprises removing at least a portion of an overlying material located over a luminescent layer. The luminescent layer is located over a microelectronics substrate. Luminescent radiation is used to determine an endpoint of the removal of the overlying material.
In another embodiment, the present invention comprises a method of fabricating an integrated circuit. This method comprises forming transistors over a microelectronics substrate, depositing a luminescent layer over the transistors, and forming interconnects in the luminescent layer to electrically connect the transistors to form an operative integrated circuit. The formation of the interconnects comprises depositing an overlying material over the luminescent layer, removing at least a portion of the overlying material, and using luminescent radiation to determine an endpoint of the removal of the overlying material.
The foregoing has outlined preferred and alternative features of the present invention so that those of ordinary skill in the art may better understand the detailed description of the invention that follows. Additional features of the invention will be described hereinafter that form the subject of the claims of the invention. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that they can readily use the disclosed conception and specific embodiment as a basis for designing or modifying other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. Those skilled in the art should also realize that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the scope of the invention.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying FIGUREs. It is emphasized that in accordance with the standard practice in the semiconductor industry, various features may not be drawn to scale. In fact, the dimensions of the various features may be arbitrarily increased or reduced for clarity of discussion. Reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention recognizes the benefits associated with using luminescence technique to determine an endpoint of the removal of a material from a microelectronics substrate. Unlike conventional optical reflectance methods, the present invention utilizes the luminescence properties of certain materials that are typically used to manufacture microelectronic devices, such as integrated circuits (ICs). In many instances the microelectronic devices are covered by an overlying material, such as metal, that either does not emit luminescence signals at all when excited with the same wavelength used to excite the underlying luminescent material, or emits luminescence at a lower wavelength than the excitation wavelength. Thus, when the overlying material is removed, the underlying layer will generate luminescence when excited at the proper wavelength, thereby indicating an endpoint removal of the overlying material.
Turning initially to
Also illustrated in this embodiment is a luminescence system 130 that comprises an excitation source 130a and a luminescence detector 130b. In an exemplary embodiment, the excitation source 130a can be a laser or lamp that is capable of generating light in the ultra-violet range that has a wavelength of about 400 nm or less. The laser that is used and its propagation wavelength, however, will depend on the type of luminescent material 110a that is present. For example, in some instances the luminescent material 110a may require a wavelength of 600 nm to become excited. In such cases, the excitation source 130a may be selected to produce light having a wavelength in that range. Thus, the present invention is not limited to any particular wavelength or material. In an alternative embodiment, a multi-wavelength “lamp” can also be used. As explained below, the luminescence detector 130b is preferably capable of detecting photon emissions at a single wavelength or generating a luminescence spectrum based on the light emanating from the luminescent material 130b.
As the microelectronics substrate 110 is rotated over the window 118, the excitation source 130a projects radiation 140 through the window 118, which propagates at a given wavelength and onto a luminescent material 110a. A few examples of the luminescent material 110a are discussed below. However, it should be understood at the outset that there is not a limitation on the type of material that can be used as long as that material is capable of generating a luminescence signal at some specified wavelength and emits radiation at a wavelength that is different from that of the overlying material. If the luminescent material 110a is exposed, as the microelectronics substrate 110 passes over the window 118, the luminescent material 110a will become excited due to being radiated at that the given wavelength. The luminescence emissions are indicated by the arrows 145. In most cases, the emissions of the luminescence 145 will propagate at a different wavelength, usually greater, than the wavelength at which the radiation 140 propagates because it typically will have less energy than that associated with the radiation emitted from the excitation source 130a. For example, if the radiation 140 propagates at 400 nm, the luminescent material 110a may emit a luminescence signal at 450 nm. It should be understood, however, that these stated wavelengths and the differences between them may vary from one embodiment to another.
The luminescence 145 is detected by the luminescence detector 130b. Preferably, the luminescence detector 130b is configured to detect photons that are emitted from the luminescent material 110a. This detection can be done either by determining luminescence intensity emitted from the luminescent material 110a at peak intensity or by comparing a detected luminescence spectrum to a standard spectrum of the particular luminescent material 110a, as discussed below.
Turning now to
In addition to the optical system 155, the embodiment 150 may further comprise a conventional friction detection (FD) system 165 that is capable of detecting a change in the amount of friction during the polishing process. This FD system 165 may be used along with the optical system 155 and the luminescence system 130, or it alone may be used with the luminescence system 130 to also provide further data to more accurately determine when an endpoint is reached. In one embodiment, the FD system 165 comprises the motor 125 and an amp meter 170 that is capable of measuring a change in motor current. The FD system 165 relies on the change in the motor current that occurs as a result of encountering either more or less rotational friction associated with polishing different materials.
In one case, the overlying material may be more difficult to remove than the underlying material. In such cases, more friction will be present during the polishing of that material. However, as that overlying material is removed and the underlying material is encountered, it may be easier to remove, which will produce less friction and cause a change in the motor current that can be detected by the amp meter 170. While the luminescence system 130 alone can be very reliable in detecting polishing endpoints, the optical system 155 and FD system 165 add tools that can provide additional data in determining endpoints.
Turning now to
The removal of the overlying material 210 is illustrated by arrows 235. The removal may be accomplished by a number of processes known to those skilled in the art. In one example, the removal process may be accomplished by using a CMP process, alternatively, however, the removal may be done by other conventional means. One such example is by conventional wet etch processes and others include dry etch processes, including plasma processes, or reactive ion etching. Since these processes are all conventional, those who are skilled in the art would understand how to employ each of these removal processes.
In an exemplary embodiment, the overlying material 210 is a metal, such as copper, aluminum, tungsten, molybdenum, or alloys thereof, that has been deposited over the luminescent material 215. The overlying material 210 is not limited to any particular material as long as it either does not emit luminescence at all when excited with the same wavelength used to radiate the underlying luminescent material 215, or emits a luminescence signal at a different wavelength than the underlying luminescent material 215. In the embodiment illustrated in
Referring now briefly to
Turning now to
Turning to
As seen from the distinguishable spectra of each of these materials, the present invention can be used to determine the endpoint between two different dielectric materials when one is deposited over the other. This also has advantages over conventional processes because of the similarity of the reflectivity of these dielectric materials; it could be very difficult to distinguish between the two. Also conventional frictional systems that depend on change in motor current may be ineffective in determining the endpoint between two similar materials inasmuch as the frictional difference between the two materials may not be sufficient to cause the motor current to change.
Referring finally to
Although the present invention has been described in detail, one who is of ordinary skill in the art should understand that they can make various changes, substitutions, and alterations herein without departing from the scope of the invention.