The invention relates to a system for detecting a translation of a body. More specifically, the invention relates to a system for detecting a translation of a body with a diffraction pattern, in particular parallel to the normal of a plane with said diffraction pattern by providing incident light beams to said diffraction pattern. The invention further relates to a method for detecting a translation of a body with a diffraction pattern, a redirection arrangement and a frequency multiplexing system.
Accurate measurement of the position or position variations of moving bodies is required in various technological applications. As an example, lithographic projection tools and wafer inspection tools applied in the semiconductor industry require accurate information on position variations of semiconductor wafers. Another field of use involves the printed circuit board (PCB) industry, wherein information on the position of the PCB is required in mounting components on a PCB, printing patterns on a PCB or inspection of PCB's.
Typically, translations of bodies are measured optically by providing incident light beams to said bodies. As an example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,710,026 discloses an apparatus including a means for providing a predetermined frequency difference between two light beams and generating an optical beat with respect to interference between first and second diffracted light beams from a diffraction grating formed on a substrate. The apparatus further has means for detecting a phase difference between the optical beat and a reference signal having a frequency corresponding to the frequency difference between the two light beams and detects a position of the substrate based upon the phase difference in accordance with an optical heterodyne interference method.
The prior art position detection apparatus is suitable for measuring translations of the substrate in the plane of the diffraction pattern. However, the detection apparatus is not able to measure out-of-plane translations of the substrate.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a system for allowing detection of out-of-plane translations of a body in an optical system.
This object is accomplished by providing a system for detecting a translation of a body with a diffraction pattern applied to said body, said system comprising:
means for providing an incident light beam to said diffraction pattern and to obtain a diffracted light beam from said diffraction pattern;
means for measuring a phase difference by interference between said incident light beam and said diffracted beam;
means for detecting said translation on the basis of said measured phase difference.
Instead of measuring the phase difference between diffracted beams, the phase of a diffracted beam is measured individually by interference of the diffracted beam with an incident light beam. The prior art concept assumes, in line with the classical explanation of the well-known laser-doppler effect, the existence of an interference pattern at the diffraction pattern, whereas, according to the invention, interference is assumed at the means for measuring the phase difference. Consequently, the measured phase difference contains information on the out-of-plane translation of the grating, and thus, of the body.
It should be appreciated that the diffracted light beam is not necessarily the result of the incident light beam. It should further be appreciated that every order of the diffracted light beam with sufficient optical power can be used for detecting the translation according to the invention. Moreover, it is noted that the light beam is not necessarily incident to the diffraction grating, as defined in claim 20, as long as the light beam is coherent with a diffracted beam from the diffraction grating.
The embodiment of the invention as defined in claim 3 provides the advantage that all translations, i.e. both in-plane and out-of-plane, can be detected. In a preferable embodiment, phase differences are determined between the first incident beam and the resulting first diffracted beam, the second incident beam and the resulting second diffracted beam and the third incident beam and the resulting third diffracted beam.
The embodiment of the invention as defined in claim 4 has the advantage that, apart from the translations, also rotations of the body can be determined. If the body rotates, this also influences the phases of the diffracted beams for measuring translation of the body. Therefore, for a body with a significant rotating motion component, the rotation should be determined to calculate the translation of the body. Accordingly, a system is obtained for determining movements for all degrees of freedom.
The embodiment of the invention as defined in claim 5 has the advantage that the redirecting means provide for a small or negligible, preferably zero, angle between an incident beam and a diffracted beam. Accordingly, the measured interference between the incident beam and diffracted beam consists of a single spot with a varying intensity. This enables the use of a relatively simple detector for measuring the interference. Further, by enabling beams to diffract several times at the diffraction pattern, translations of the body can be determined with a higher accuracy. A particularly advantageous embodiment of the first redirection means is defined in claim 6.
The embodiment of the invention as defined in claim 7 has the advantage that the use of the reference beam for both the measurement of the phase of the incident beam and the phase of the diffracted beam increases the accuracy of the measured phase difference between said beams.
The embodiment of the invention as defined in claims 8 and 9 has the advantage that diffracted light beams from particular incident beams do not detrimentally influence the measurement of the phase difference, i.e. cross talk between diffracted beams is eliminated or reduced. This embodiment may apply separate lasers for each incident light beam, wherein these lasers are incoherent or have an appropriately large frequency difference. Alternatively, a single laser of which the light beam is split in parts, can be used. In particular, at least one of those parts may be used for the reference beam in a heterodyne system.
The embodiment of the invention as defined in claims 10-13 has the advantage of reduced complexity, and accordingly reduced costs, as compared to the system of claims 8 and 9. The stabilized laser for a reference beam and the modulation scheme with the wavelength trigger account for the inherent instability of a semiconductor laser and the preferably high modulation frequencies. Other types of lasers, e.g. a gas laser, may be used as well, as long as such lasers are sensitive for light reflected towards said lasers. The high frequency of the modulation it to obtain an adequate number of samples for a translation of the diffraction pattern. This homodyne embodiment applying laser self mixing is suitable for applications requiring less accuracy in detecting translations.
It should be appreciated that the embodiments described above, or aspects thereof, may be combined.
The invention also relates to a method for detecting a translation of a body with a diffraction pattern applied to said body, comprising the steps of:
providing an incident light beam to said diffraction pattern;
obtaining a diffracted light beam from said diffraction pattern;
measuring a phase difference by interfering said incident light beam and said diffracted beam;
detecting said translation on the basis of said measured phase difference.
The method according to the invention enable the measured phase difference to contain information on the out-of-plane translation of the grating, and thus, of the body. In the embodiment of the invention as defined in claims 15 and 16, the method provides information of all translations, respectively, all rotations of the body.
Finally the invention also relates to components of the above described system or applied for the method.
In particular, the invention relates to a redirection arrangement for returning a light beam incident on said arrangement substantially along the same optical path, said arrangement comprising a cube corner, a polarizing beam splitter, a half wavelength plate and a prism. When applied in the system for determining translations of a body, this arrangement has the advantage that the redirecting means provide for a small or negligible, preferably zero, angle between an incident beam and a diffracted beam. However, the redirection arrangement can be more generally applied in case of incident light beams that should be redirected along the optical path of the incident light beam.
Moreover, the invention relates to a frequency multiplexing system arranged to provide light beams to a body with a diffraction pattern in a system for detecting translations of said body, wherein said frequency multiplexing system comprises a single laser source to provide a laser beam of a predetermined frequency and means for splitting said laser beam into a plurality of parts and shifting the frequency of one or more of said parts to obtain different frequencies for said incident light beams, wherein said system is arranged to use one of said parts as a reference beam in combination with each of said incident beams for said system for detecting a translation of said body.
The invention will be further illustrated with reference to the attached drawings, which schematically show a preferred embodiment according to the invention. It will be understood that the invention is not in any way restricted to this specific and preferred embodiment.
In the drawings:
As an example,
The system 1 further comprises position sensitive detectors 5 arranged to receive further orders, in
More precisely, for a two-dimensional diffraction grating 3, diffraction orders are indicated by two coordinates. The first order is indicated by (0,0), the first order in the x-direction by (1,0), the first order in the y-direction by (0,1) etc. In the embodiment described here, the further orders (0,0) and (−1,0) are used for measuring the rotation of the body 2. The order (0,0), hereinafter indicated again by order 0, is only sensitive to rotations Rx and Ry, while higher orders, here (−1,0) are sensitive to Rx, Ry and Rz. However, other further orders, such as (−1,−1), may be used as well. The indication hereinafter of the order by two coordinates is omitted for clarity purposes.
The diffracted +1st order beams D1, D2, D3 are directed to first redirection means 6. After passing this retro-reflector, the beams D1, D2, and D3 are directed to the grating 3 for a second time. Some of the diffracted beams are incident on the optical heads 4 and the phase of these further diffracted beams is measured for detecting a translation of the grating 3.
The diffracted orders 0 and −1 fall onto the two-dimensional position sensitive detector 5 and a one-dimensional position sensitive device, respectively. The position of the spot of diffraction order 0 is measured in two directions with the two-dimensional position sensitive detector 5, whereas the position of the −1st order beam is measured in one direction.
The three phase measurements and the three spot position measurements are used to determine the three translations and three rotations of the diffraction grating 3.
In
The three optical heads 4 are positioned and oriented such that the three incident light beams I1, I2 and I3 are directed along three edges of a virtual pyramid P, shown in
The function of the first redirecting means 6, hereinafter also referred to as zero-offset retro-reflector, is to redirect an incoming beam such that the reflected beam is parallel to the incoming beam and also coincides with the incoming beam. The zero-offset retro-reflector 6 comprises a cube corner 7, a polarizing beam splitter cube 8, a half wavelength plate 9, and a prism 10 acting as folding mirror. Normally, cube corners are used as retro-reflectors. The incident and reflected beams are parallel to each other, but they are spatially separated. The zero-offset retro-reflector 6 redirects an incident beam along the same optical path back to the grating 3. If the direction or the position of the incident beam is not nominal, then the offset between the incident and reflected beams will not be zero.
The configuration of the optical heads 4 depends on the method with which the phase of the diffracted beams D1, D2, D3 is measured. For the measurement system based on two beam interference, the optical heads 4 can be configured as in
A reference beam RB is provided to measure the phase of the incident beam I interferometrically, i.e. by two-beam interference. Before the incident beam I1 is directed to the diffraction grating 3, a small part of it is split off by an optical component 20 and combined with a part of the reference beam RB and made to interfere at a detector 21. As is typical for a heterodyne system, the electrical signal from this detector 21 is used as a reference signal. The phase of this electrical reference signal is equal to the phase difference between the two interfering beams I1 and RB, apart from a certain constant. The part of the further diffracted beam Dx from the grating 3 to the optical head 4 is made to interfere at a second detector 22 with the remainder of the reference beam RB. The phase of the electrical signal from this detector 22 is equal to the phase difference between the two interfering beams Dx and RB, apart from a certain constant. The detector 22 converts intensity variations due to interference of light beam into electrical signals. Thus, the phase difference ΔΦ between the two detector signals is equal to the phase shift of the diffracted beam Dx, introduced by a translation T of the grating 3.
The double-pass beam layout of
To increase the rotation range further, a quad-pass layout can be used as illustrated in
The rotation ranges mentioned above are based on the assumption that the body 2 is flat over the area on which the spots fall. This area is equal to the spot size plus the allowed beam walk-off. For the double-pass layout, the area has a diameter of 6 mm; for the quad-pass layout this area has a diameter of 25 mm. A curvature of the grating 3 over this area may reduce the rotation range. The rotation ranges wherein accurate detection of the translation of the body 2 is enabled may be considerably larger than for the prior art systems.
The four frequencies at which the acousto-optical modulators 34 are driven are chosen such that the frequencies of the electrical signals for the detectors 21 and 22 (the so-called beat frequencies which are equal to the frequency differences between further diffracted beams Dx and reference beams RB) are different from each other. As a result, the detector signal frequencies are in separate bands. It is noted that accordingly, due to motion of the grating 3, the frequencies of the further diffracted beams Dx change, and as a consequence, the beat frequencies shift.
The reason for choosing these beat frequencies to be in separate frequency bands is the following. As shown in
As an example, the frequencies of the acousto-optical modulators are chosen to be 15 MHz, 30 MHz, 45 MHz and 60 MHz. Thus, the frequencies of the detector signals will be (if the grating is not moving) 45 MHz, 30 MHz, and 15 MHz for the first, second and third incident beams I1, I2 and I3 respectively. If each of these signals varies within a bandwidth of ±7.5 MHz due to the motion of the grating 3, then the variation is still in separate bands. For an angle of incidence of 20° for I1, I2 and I3 and a wavelength λ of 632.8 nm, the grating period p has to be 1.85 μm. With these values and with the quad-pass beam layout of
The unwanted contributions to the interference in the optical head 4 meant for the diffracted beam D1 are due to interference between the zero order beam D3 and the reference beam RB at a beat frequency of 15 MHz and interference between the zero order beam D3 and the diffracted beam D1 at a beat frequency of 30 MHz. The wanted contribution is due to interference between the diffracted beam D1 and the reference beam RB at a beat frequency of 45 MHz. Summarizing, by selective filtering, the wanted and unwanted contributions can be separated.
The incident light beam I1 is generated by the diode laser 40. The diffracted light beam Dx that is returned to the laser 40 influences the laser power, which is monitored by the detector 41 by leakage of a small portion of the incident light to this detector, such that the phase shift of the detector signal i0(t) is equal to the phase shift ΔΦ of the returned diffracted beam Dx. Thus, by measuring the phase shift of the detector signal i0(t), the phase shift of the diffracted beam Dx, which results from a translation T and/or rotation R of the grating 3 can be determined. Further, a stabilized laser 42 provides a reference beam RB.
The system of
FIGS. 12 and 13A-13J illustrate an embodiment of the invention for solving this problem. The diode laser 40 is modulated using the input current ii(t). The output current of the detector or monitor diode 41 is denoted by io(t). The phase of the incident light beam is φ(t). The phase of the diffracted light beam is indicated with φ(t−τ), with τ the time it takes for the laser beam to return to the laser 40. The radial frequency of the laser beam is ω(t). The radial frequency of the reference beam RB is denoted with ω0.
The modulation of the diode laser is shown in
In order to measure the phase shift introduced by a translation T of the grating 3, the phase of io(t). However, due to the modulation of the frequency (or wavelength), the relation between phase shift and translation is unknown. Therefore, the wavelength λ should be determined and taken into account. The wavelength of the diode laser 40 is not very stable, due to drifts. As a consequence, it is advantageous to measure the wavelength of the diode laser 40 by a detector 43 generating a current ir(t). The accuracy is determined mainly by the stand-off distance S and the required accuracy with which the translation T should be detected. At a stand-off distance S of 100 mm, a quad-pass beam setup of
Such accuracies can be reached by directly measuring the frequency difference between the diode laser 40 and the stabilized reference laser 42. Because of the high modulation frequency of the input current ii(t), the frequency difference is not measured continuously. Instead, the system is arranged to generate a trigger if the wavelength ω(t) of the diode laser 40 crosses a certain value, determined by the wavelength ω0 of the reference laser 42 and the central frequency of a narrow-bandpass filter 44 connected to the detector 43. An electrical power detector 45 is used to detect the passed signal.
The trigger is generated from the trigger unit 46 with an accuracy of 0.5 MHz to get the 1 nm accuracy. The modulation depth of the input current must be such that the phase shift is a few times 2π. Thus, with a center wavelength of about 0.6 μm for the laser, a stand-off distance S of 100 mm, the quad-pass beam layout of
A particularly interesting application of the system according to the invention is for wafer positioning. Conventionally, wafer positioning is performed by placing a wafer on a chuck that has attached mirrors. With the system of the invention, such a chuck may be omitted and positioning of the wafer can be controlled by applying a diffraction grating 3 on the wafer and measuring phase difference between an incident beam on said wafer and a diffracted beam from said wafer.
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate, rather than limit, the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. The gist of the invention relates to the insight that measuring the phase difference between a beam D which is diffracted by a grating 3 and a light beam L which is not, allows to detect in-plane as well as the out-of-plane translation of the grating 3, as shown in
In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word “comprising” does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in a claim. The word “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
04105955.1 | Nov 2004 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB05/53800 | 11/17/2005 | WO | 00 | 5/17/2007 |