Determining an application delivery server based on geo-location information

Abstract

A method for web service load balancing may commence with receiving, from a local DNS server, a request for a web service. The local DNS server may be coupled to a web client requesting the web service. The request may include local DNS server information. The method may continue with determining a geographic location of the local DNS server based on the local DNS server information. The method may further include selecting a web server from a plurality of web servers based on the web service. The method may continue with determining a geographic location of the web server and determining that the geographic location of the local DNS server matches the geographic location of the web server. The method may further include selecting the web server based on the match. The method may continue with sending a response to the local DNS server.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field

This invention relates generally to data communications, and more specifically, to a method and system to balance web server load based on global geographic location.

Background

Web sites are known to use many web servers to serve large numbers of web clients accessing the web sites. The web servers, or application delivery servers, deliver web applications such as web pages, videos, file transfers, photo transfers, office applications, email applications, enterprise web applications and many other consumer and enterprise applications using web technologies. In a typical deployment scenario, the web servers are behind a server load balancer (SLB). The SLB receives a web service request from a web client, selects a web server, and relays the web service request to the selected web server. The network architecture using a SLB and a plurality of web servers allows not only a web site to serve many web clients, but also provides fault resiliency to a web site in case one or more web servers fail, while the remaining web servers continue to provide web services. A web site may deploy a plurality of SLB's to provide fault tolerance to one or more SLB failures. However, as a web site grows in popularity, a single or a few SLB's with a plurality of web servers may not be sufficient. Large number of SLB's and a very large number of web servers are necessary to serve a large web site such as google.com or yahoo.com.

Moreover, the large number of web servers and SLB's are hosted in a plurality of data centers, so as to provide further fault tolerance in case of data center failure. The data centers are usually far apart, with at least tens or hundreds of miles apart. When a web client accesses the web site, the web service request is assigned to a web server in one of the data centers. The quality of the web service then depends on the chosen data center, where the service quality may depend on the distance between the data center and the web client, the load of the web servers in the data center, the network capacity of the web servers in the data center to the web client, and other network or computing factors between the data center and the web client. Thus, the location information of the web client becomes an important factor in selecting a data center, and in selecting a web server of the data center to serve the web service request from the web client.

It is common to use a Domain Name System (DNS) to deploy a plurality of web servers for a web service based on a Uniform Resource Locator (URL). In one embodiment, a web client sends an inquiry to a DNS server with a domain name, which is a part of the URL. A DNS server responds with a plurality of records, each of which refers to a web server. In various methods, the web client uses the plurality of records referencing the plurality of web servers to determine a particular web server, the web client selects a web server using a round robin scheme on the plurality of web servers, the web client selects a web server used in a previous web session on the same web service, or the web client selects a web server different from a previous web session on the same web service where the previous web session encountered an error.

In one method, a local DNS server assists the web client in selecting a web server. The local DNS server receives information for a plurality of web servers from a global DNS server. In one embodiment, the local DNS server selects a web server from the plurality of web servers. For example, the local DNS server selects a web server using a round robin scheme. In one method, the local DNS server selects the first web server from the plurality of web servers.

However, as mentioned above, there is no existing method to select a web server based on location information or to balance web server load based on location information, so as to provide a better web service, and to provide fault tolerance upon data center failure.

Therefore, there is a need for a system and method to balance web server load based on location information of a web client.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Provided are computer-implemented methods and systems for web service load balancing. According to one example embodiment, a system for web service load balancing includes a plurality of web servers and a global load balancer coupled to a local DNS server. The global load balancer may be configured to receive, from the local DNS server, a request for a web service. The local DNS server may be coupled to a web client requesting the web service. The request may include local DNS server information. The global load balancer may be further configured to determine a geographic location of the local DNS server based on the local DNS server information. The global load balancer may be further configured to select a web server from a plurality of web servers based on the web service. The global load balancer may be further configured to determine a geographic location of the web server and determine that the geographic location of the local DNS server matches the geographic location of the web server. Based on the match, the global load balancer may select the web server and send a response comprising information for the web server to the local DNS server.

According to one example embodiment, a method for web service load balancing may commence with receiving, from a local DNS server, a request for a web service. The local DNS server may be coupled to a web client requesting the web service. The request may include local DNS server information. The method may continue with determining a geographic location of the local DNS server based on the local DNS server information. The method may further include selecting a web server from a plurality of web servers based on the web service. The method may continue with determining a geographic location of the web server and determining that the geographic location of the local DNS server matches the geographic location of the web server. The method may further include selecting the web server based on the match. The method may continue with sending a response to the local DNS server. The response may include information on the web server.

Other features, examples, and embodiments are described below. System and computer program products corresponding to the above-summarized methods are also described and claimed herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates a global geographic location or geo-location based web service load balancing.

FIG. 1a illustrates embodiments of geo-locations.

FIG. 2 illustrates a process to determine geo-location of local DNS server.

FIG. 3 illustrates a process to obtain geo-location and web server using domain name.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process to compare geo-location of local DNS server and geo-location of web server.

FIG. 5 illustrates a process to select web server based on additional web service performance factors.

FIG. 5a illustrates several embodiments of performance factor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the embodiment will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments. Thus, the invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.

FIG. 1 illustrates a global geographic location or geo-location based web service load balancing. Web service 132 is offered to web clients 112 and 113 in a global data network 100. Data network 100 includes the Internet. In one embodiment, data network 100 includes cellular data network, a General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) network, a third-generation cellular (3G) network, or a fourth-generation cellular (4G) network. In one embodiment, data network 100 includes an Internet service provider network. In one embodiment, data network 100 includes a wireless network, such as a Wi-Fi hotspot network. In one embodiment, data network 100 includes a wired network such as Ethernet. In one embodiment, data network 100 includes a corporate internal network or intranet, a virtual private network (VPN) or an extranet. In one embodiment, data network 100 includes a service provider internal network or a walled garden service network within the service provider network.

In one embodiment, web client 112 is a computing device with web access through data network 100. In one embodiment, web client 112 accesses data network 100 using Internet Protocol (IP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), or any other web-based protocol. In one example, web client 112 includes a web browser, a web widget accessing data network 100, a web-based operating system accessing data network 100 using a web-based protocol. In one embodiment, web client 112 includes Google Android, Google Chrome™ or other web-based operating system. In one embodiment, web client 112 includes Microsoft Internet Explorer™, Google Chrome™ Firefox®, Apple Safari™, Opera or other web browser. In one embodiment, web client 112 is a personal computer, a notebook, a netbook, a mobile Internet device (MID), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a smartphone, a mobile phone, a media player, a mobile media player, a mobile television set, a television set, a set-top box, a net-top box, an Internet-enabled DVD player or other computing appliance with web access to data network 100.

In one embodiment, web service 132 includes a service offered by a web site or a web portal. In one embodiment, web service 132 includes a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), such as http://www.abc.com, ftp://ftp aaa.com, https://secure.online-banking.com, www.a-web-site.com, http://www.abc.com/banner.png, https://secure.online-banking.com/?user=jonny+password=0CB56D7104. In one embodiment, web service 132 comprises domain name 133. For example, domain name 133 can be www.abc.com, ftp.aaa.com, secure.online-banking.com, www.a-web-site.com, abc.com, a-web-site.com, on-line-banking.com. In one embodiment, domain name 133 relates to the type of web service 132. In one embodiment, www.abc.com relates to HTTP service; ftp.aaa.com relates to file transfer (FTP) services; secure.online-banking.com relates to secure services.

Web server 142 serves web service 132. In one embodiment, web server 142 is a computing device servicing web service 132. In one embodiment, web server 142 includes a web server software such as Apache HTTP Server, Websphere™, Weblogic™, Internet Information Services (IIS)™, or other web server software. In one embodiment, web server 142 is a server load balancer (SLB). In one embodiment, web server 142 includes a plurality of server computers serving web service 132. In one embodiment web server 142 includes geo-location 146. In one embodiment web server 142 serves web service 132 within geo-location 146. Web server 143 also serves web service 132. In one embodiment web server 143 includes geo-location 147 and serves web service 132 within geo-location 147. In one embodiment, web servers 142 and 143 serve web service 132 in their corresponding geo-location 146 and geo-location 147 respectively. By spreading the load for serving web service 132, web servers 142 and 143 provide better services for web service 132.

In order to select web server 142 for web service 132, web client 112 obtains domain name 133 and queries local domain name system (DNS) server 122 using domain name 133 for web server 142. Like-wise, web client 113 obtains domain name 133 and queries local DNS server 123. In one embodiment, local DNS server 122 sends domain name 133 to DNS server 125. In one embodiment, DNS server 125 determines web server 142, using domain name 133 and geo-location 126 of local DNS server 122.

In one embodiment, geo-location 126 indicates a geographic location of local DNS server 122. In one embodiment geo-location 126 includes a country such as United States, Japan, Luxemburg, or Egypt. In one embodiment geo-location 126 includes a state or province such as California of United States, or Guangzhou of China. In one embodiment geo-location 126 includes a region such as an island, a metropolitan, north-east region of United States, west coast, or a tri-city area. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes a city such as San Francisco, Tokyo, Beijing, Paris, or London. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes a district in a city such as down-town, up-town, Richmond district of San Francisco, or Chinatown of New York City. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes a street block, a building, a campus, or a street address. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes an area served by an Internet gateway, a hot-spot access point, a mobile Internet gateway, a wireless gateway, or a wireless or cellular base station. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes hierarchical information of locations, such as down-town district of San Francisco in California State of United States. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes global position information such as longitude and latitude information. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes height information or floor information in a building, such as 1000 feet above sea level, 3^rd floor, or basement. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 includes a neighborhood or area around a location. For example, geo-location 126 indicates 3^rd floor of a building and an area of two floors above and one floor below the 3^rd floor. In another example, geo-location 126 indicates a 5 miles area from a building or a landmark.

FIG. 1a illustrates embodiments of geo-location 126 and geo-location 146. For example, NA.US.CA.SF indicates San Francisco (SF) city of California (CA) state in United States (US) country of North America (NA) continent; NA.US.CA indicates California state in United States of North America continent; CA.LA indicates Los Angeles (LA) city of California (CA); CA.PA.DN indicates Downtown (DN) district of Palo Alto (PA) of California; NY.NY.(−73.98592, 40.74831) indicates geo-physical location of longitude −73.98592, latitude 40.74831 in New York (NY) city of New York (NY) state; AS.JP indicates Japan (JP) country of Asia (AS) continent.

In one embodiment, geo-location 126 indicates a geographic location of web client 112, which is served by local DNS server 122 for DNS services. In one scenario, web client 112 is in New York City downtown and local DNS server 122 serves DNS services for New York City. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 indicates the location of local DNS server 122. In one scenario, local DNS server 122 is located in an office in New York City downtown area. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 indicates the location of an IP gateway connecting to web client 112. In one embodiment, the IP gateway is a Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer (DSLAM) located in a Central Office (CO) in New York City downtown. In these embodiments, geo-location 126 indicates New York City downtown.

After selecting web server 142, DNS server 125 replies to local DNS server 122 information about web server 142. In one embodiment, the reply includes an IP address of web server 142. In one embodiment, the reply includes a host name of web server 142. In one embodiment, the reply includes an identity of web server 142. Local DNS server 122 replies to web client 112 of web server 142. Web client 112 then establishes a web session with web server 142 to process web service 132.

Since web clients 112 and 113 request web service 132 from possibly different geo-locations, it is important for the web service 132 to be served in the most efficient manner. For example, web service 132 desires to be served with the best response time. Web service 132 uses web server 142 with lower network latency to web client 112. In one embodiment, the network latency is directly correlated to the distance between web server 142 and web client 112. If web server 142 is geographically closer to web client 112 than from web server 143 to web client 112, web server 142 would have lower network latency to web client 112 than the network latency between web server 143 to web client 112. In one embodiment, web service 132 is to serve with the most security. Web service 132 will use web server 142 with better security to server web client 112. In one embodiment, web service 132 is to be served with the most bandwidth or computing resource. In one embodiment web server 142 is has more CPU capability and more network capacity, and serves web client 112 better than web server 143.

Global load balancer 127 comprises the necessary geo-location information to determine if web server 142 best serves web service 132 to web client 112. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 includes geo-location 146 of web server 142. In one embodiment, geo-location 146 is a location where web server 142 resides. In one embodiment, web server 142 serves web client 112 in geo-location 146. In another embodiment, web server 142 may not be where it resides, but the web server 142 serves web client 112 served by local DNS server 122 in geo-location 146. In one embodiment, web server 142 has more network capacity to geo-location 146 and would serve web client 112 better. In one embodiment, web server 132 indicates a secure web service. Web server 142 has strong secure connection to geo-location 146 and would better serve web client 112.

In one embodiment, geo-location 146 relates to the country of origin of domain name 133. For example, domain name 133 being www.abc.com.cn has a country of origin of China; ftp.aaa.com.de has a country of origin of Denmark and indicates a file transfer service.

In one embodiment, DNS server 125 obtains domain name 133 from local DNS server 122. In one embodiment, DNS server 125 sends domain name 133 and information about local DNS server 122 to global load balancer 127. In one embodiment, DNS server 125 sends the IP address 124 of local DNS server 122 to global load balancer 127. In one embodiment, web server 142 comprises a plurality of servers, and the global load balancer 127 is a server load balancer balancing the load of these servers. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 is a network device residing in data network 100. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 is a computer or a computing server. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 includes a software running in a network device or a computer. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 includes storage and memory to be used in selecting a web server. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 includes a network appliance or a network gateway.

Global load balancer 127 determines geo-location 126 based on IP address 124. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 determines geo-location 126 based on domain name 133. FIG. 2 will illustrate a process to determine geo-location 126.

In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 obtains web server 142 based on domain name 133 such that web server 142 can serve web service 132, the web service 132 including domain name 133. Global load balancer 127 obtains geo-location 146 based on web server 142. In a later section in this specification, FIG. 3 illustrates a process to obtain web server 142 and geo-location 146. After obtaining geo-location 146, global load balancer 127 compares geo-location 146 and geo-location 126 to determine if web server 142 provides optimal service to domain name 133. FIG. 4 will illustrate a process to compare geo-location 126 and geo-location 146. If there is a match, global load balancer 127 selects web server 142. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 responds to DNS server 125 with web server 142 to serve the web service 132. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 responds to local DNS server 123 with web server 142.

In one embodiment, the global load balancer 127 determines there is no match between geo-location 126 and geo-location 146 and selects web server 142 using other methods. In one embodiment, global DNS server 125 selects web server 142, and the global load balancer 127 determines there is no match between geo-location 126 and geo-location 146. Global load balancer 127 then responds with web server 142 to local DNS server 123.

In one embodiment, DNS server 125 includes functionality of global load balancer 127. DNS server 125 responds to local DNS server 123 with web server 142. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 includes functionality of DNS server 125 and responds to local DNS server 123 with web server 142. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 intercepts the response from DNS server 125 to local DNS server 122, and alters the response to indicate web server 142 to serve domain name 133. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 determines there is no match between geo-location 126 and geo-location 146, and does not alter the response.

In one embodiment, DNS server 125 obtains geo-location 146 of web server 142, and sends geo-location 146 to global load balancer 127. Global load balancer 127 uses geo-location 146 and domain name 133 to select web server 142. Global load balancer 127 responds to DNS server 125 with web server 142. DNS server 125 then responds to local DNS server 123 with web server 142.

FIG. 2 illustrates a process to determine geo-location 126 of local DNS server 122.

Local DNS server 122 sends a DNS request 157 to DNS server 125. In one embodiment global load balancer 127 includes the functionality of DNS server 125, and obtains DNS request 157. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 is a network appliance between DNS server 125 and local DNS server 122. Global load balancer 127 receives DNS request 157 from data network 100. Local DNS server 122 includes IP address 124. In one embodiment IP address 124 is the host IP address of local DNS server 122 in data network 100. In one embodiment, DNS request 157 is based on Internet protocol (IP), and DNS request 157 includes IP address 124 in the IP packet header. In one embodiment, DNS request 157 includes IP address 124 in the DNS request 157 packet payload. In one embodiment, DNS request 157 includes domain name 133.

Global load balancer 127 receives DNS request 157 and obtains IP address 124. Global load balancer 127 connects to a DNS server location database 173. In one embodiment, server location database 173 is a database and global load balancer 127 uses IP address 124 to query server location database 173. DNS server location database 173 includes location entry 161 consisting of IP address 184 and geo-location 126. Server location database 173 matches IP address 124 against location entry 161 by matching IP address 124 against IP address 184. In one embodiment, IP address 184 is the same as IP address 124. For example, IP address 124 is 75.105.78.235, and IP address 184 is 75.105.78.235. In one embodiment, IP address 184 includes a range of IP addresses wherein the range of IP addresses includes IP address 124. For example IP address 184 is 75.105.78.224-255. Server location database 173 determines that IP address 124 matches IP address 184, and determines location entry 161 matches IP address 124. Global load balancer 127 obtains geo-location 126 from location entry 161. In one embodiment, DNS server location database 173 includes a storage containing location entry 161. Global load balancer 127 obtains location entry 161 from DNS server location database 173.

In one embodiment, server location database 173 includes a storage for storing location entry 161. Global load balancer 127 retrieves location entry 161 and matches IP address 124 against location entry 161. In one embodiment server location database 173 is a computing server connecting to global load balancer 127 over a data network such as data network 100. Global load balancer 127 sends a request comprising IP address 124 to server location database 173. Server location database 173 matches IP address 124 against location entry 161, and sends a response comprising location entry 161 or geo-location 126 to global load balancer 127.

FIG. 3 illustrates a process to obtain geo-location 146 and web server 142 using domain name 133.

In one embodiment, DNS server 125 sends domain name 133 to global load balancer 127. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 obtains domain name 133 from DNS request 157.

In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 connects to a web server location database 175. Web server location database 175 includes web server location entry 165. Web server location entry 165 includes domain name 135. In one embodiment, web server location database 175 includes a storage which comprises web server location entry 165. Global load balancer 127 obtains web server location entry 165 from web server location database 175 and compares domain name 133 against domain name 135. In one embodiment, domain name 133 is www.abc.com and domain name 135 is www.abc.com and the two domain names are the same. Global load balancer 127 determines there is a match between domain name 133 and domain name 135. In one embodiment, domain name 133 is www.abc.com and domain name 135 is abc.com. Domain name 133 is a sub-domain of domain name 135. Global load balancer 127 determines that there is a match between the two domain name 133 and domain name 135. In one embodiment, domain name 135 includes all domain names from www.a.com to www.i.com, where domain name 135 indicates including all domain names within the alphabetical order from www.a.com to www.i.com. Global load balancer 127 determines there is a match between domain name 133 and domain name 135. In one embodiment, web server location entry 165 includes web server 142. Global load balancer 127 obtains web server 142 from web server location entry 165.

In one embodiment, domain name 135 is www.abc.*, indicating domain name 135 includes any domain name with prefix www.abc. Global load balancer 127 determines domain name 133, being www.abc.com, has a prefix www.abc, and determines domain name 133 matches domain name 135.

In one embodiment, web server location database 175 is a computer server, and connects to global load balancer 127 via data network 100. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 sends a request comprising domain name 133 to web server location database 175. In one embodiment web server location database 175 includes web server location entry 165. Web server location database 175 matches domain name 133 against web server location entry 165, and determines there is a match. Web server location database 175 sends web server location entry 165 to global load balancer 127. In one embodiment, web server location database 175 sends web server 142 to global load balancer 127.

In one embodiment, web server location entry 165 includes geo-location 146. Global load balancer 127 obtains geo-location 146 from web server location entry 165. In one embodiment, web server location database 175 sends geo-location 146 to global load balancer 127. In one embodiment, after global load balancer 127 receives web server 142 from web server location database 175, global load balancer 127 sends a request comprising web server 142 to web server location database 175. Web server location database 175 responds with geo-location 146. In one embodiment, after global load balancer 127 obtains web server 142, global load balancer 127 looks up web server location database 175 storage, and retrieves geo-location 146.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process to compare geo-location 126 of local DNS server 122 and geo-location 146 of web server 142.

In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 compares geo-location 126 and geo-location 146 and determines if there is a match. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 is a sub-location or sub-area of geo-location 146. In one scenario, geo-location 126 is NA.US.CA.SF and geo-location 146 is NA.US.CA. Geo-location 126 is the San Francisco city sub-area of geo-location 146 of California State. Global load balancer 127 determines there is a match. In another scenario, geo-location 126 is CA.PA.DN, or downtown district of Palo Alto city of California, and geo-location 126 is CA.PA or Palo Alto city of California. Global load balancer 127 determines there is a match. In one scenario, geo-location 126 is CA.PA.DN and geo-location 146 is CA.LA or Los Angeles city of California. Global load balancer 127 determines there is no match. In one embodiment, geo-location 126 is NY.NY,(−73.98592, 40.74831) and geo-location 146 is NY.NY.DN or downtown of New York city of New York State. Global load balancer 127 calculates the distance between the geo-location 126 and downtown of New York City, and determines that geo-location 126 is in the downtown area. Global load balancer 127 determines there is a match. In another scenario, geo-location 126 is NY.NY.(−73.98592, 40.74831) and geo-location 146 is NY.NY.(−73.994167, 40.751667; 10 miles). Global load balancer 127 calculates the distance between global positions (−73.98592, 40.74831) and (−73.994167, 40.751667) is less than 10 miles. Global load balancer 127 determines there is a match between geo-location 126 and geo-location 146.

Upon determination of a match between geo-location 126 and geo-location 146, global load balancer 127 selects web server 142 to serve web service 132, and responds to DNS server 125, or local DNS server 122.

FIG. 5 illustrates a process to select web server 142 based on additional web service performance factors.

In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 further selects web server 142 based on performance factor 192. FIG. 5a illustrates several embodiments of performance factor 192. In one embodiment performance factor 192 includes latency. In one embodiment web server location entry 165 includes latency 185. Latency 185 indicates a summary latency of previous web sessions between web server 142 and other web clients within geo-location 146. In one embodiment, the web sessions are related to web service 132. In one embodiment, latency 185 indicates a summary latency of previous web sessions within a period of time, such as within a week, a month, a day or last hour. In one embodiment, the period of time is the morning hours within a month.

In one embodiment web server location database 175 includes web server location entry 167 for web server 143. Web server location entry 167 includes geo-location 147 and latency 186. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 determines there is a match between geo-location 126 and geo-location 146, and between geo-location 126 and geo-location 147. Global load balancer 127 compares latency 185 and latency 186. In one embodiment, latency 185 is smaller than latency 186. Global load balancer 127 selects web server 142. In one embodiment, web server location database 175 compares latency 185 and latency 186, and selects web server 142.

In one embodiment, web server 142 is selected to serve web service 132 to web client 112. During the web session, web server 142 determines a latency of the web session, and updates latency 185. In one embodiment, web server 142 measures the web session latency by measuring a round trip time of a network packet from web server 142 to web client 112.

In one embodiment, web server 142 measures a latency between web server 142 and local DNS server 122, by measuring a round trip time of a packet from web server 142 to local DNS server 122. In one embodiment, web server 142 obtains IP address 124 of local DNS server 122 from global load balancer 127, uses IP address 124 to communicate with local DNS server 122, and measures the round trip time.

In one embodiment, performance factor 192 includes a bandwidth or network capacity. In one embodiment, web server location entry 165 includes network capacity 187, which indicates the network capacity or bandwidth between web server 142 and data network 100. In one embodiment, network capacity 187 is based on the connection capacity between web server 142 and geo-location 146. In one embodiment, network capacity 187 is based on certain time of the day. In one example, network capacity 187 in the business hours is higher than network capacity 187 in the evening hours. In one example, network capacity 187 during lunch hours is higher than network capacity 187 during mid morning.

In one embodiment, web server location entry 167 includes network capacity 188. In one embodiment, global load balancer 127 compares network capacity 187 and network capacity 188, and determines that network capacity 187 is larger than network capacity 188. Global load balancer 127 selects web server 142. In one embodiment, web server location database lxx compares network capacity 187 and network capacity 188 and selects web server 142.

In one embodiment, performance factor 192 includes processing capability. In one embodiment, web server location entry 165 includes processing capability 191. In various embodiments, processing capability 191 indicates the computing capability of web server 142, such as, for example a processing speed, a number of processors web server 142 has, a memory capacity, other processing capabilities, or a combination of such processing capabilities. In one embodiment, processing capability 191 is related to geo-location 146. In one embodiment, processing capability 191 is related to a time of the day. For example, processing capability 191 is lower during business hours than during evening hours. In one example, processing capability 191 is higher in the weekend than during weekdays.

In one embodiment, web server location entry 167 includes processing capability 193. Global load balancer 127 compares processing capability 191 and processing capability 193, and selects web server 142 when processing capability 191 is better than processing capability 193. In one embodiment, processing capability 191 indicates an average processing time to serve a web session for web service 132 by web server 142. In one embodiment, processing capability 191 indicates the worst or best processing time to serve a web session for web service 132 by web server 142.

The invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements. In a preferred embodiment, the invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.

Furthermore, the invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport eh program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk—read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk—read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.

Although the invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1. A system for web service load balancing, the system comprising: a plurality of web servers;a global load balancer coupled to a local domain name system (DNS) server, wherein the global load balancer is configured to: receive, from the local DNS server, a request for a web service, the local DNS server being coupled to a web client requesting the web service, the request including local DNS server information and a requested domain name;based on the local DNS server information, determine a local DNS server geographic location associated with the local DNS server;based on the web service, select one or more web servers from the plurality of web servers;based on the requested domain name, query a web server location database, wherein the web server location database includes a plurality of entries, each entry of the plurality of entries including a domain name, a network address of one of the plurality of web servers, a geographic location of the one of the plurality of web servers, and a performance factor associated with the one of the plurality of web servers;based on the querying, identify, in the web server location database, one or more entries including the domain name that matches the requested domain name;based on the identified one or more entries and the one or more web servers selected based on the web service, receive, from the web server location database, network addresses of the one or more web servers, geographic locations of the one or more web servers, and performance factors associated with the one or more web servers:determine if any of the geographic locations of the one or more web servers matches the local DNS server geographic location;based on the match, select, from the one or more web servers, a web server based on the performance factors of the one or more web servers, wherein the performance factor of each of the one or more web servers includes a processing capability, wherein the selecting the web server includes determining the web server with a best processing capability, the web server being associated with a network address; andsend a response to the local DNS server, the response including at least the network address of the web server.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the local DNS server geographic location includes one of the following: a geographic location of the web client;a geographic location at which the local DNS server resides; anda geographic location of an Internet Protocol (IP) gateway connected to the web client.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the geographic location of the one or more web servers includes one of the following: a geographic location at which the one or more web servers reside;the local DNS server geographic location serviced by the one or more web servers; anda web client geographic location serviced by the one or more web servers.

4. The system of claim 1, further comprising a server location database, wherein the local DNS server information includes an IP address of the local DNS server, the determining the local DNS server geographic location including: querying the server location database using the IP address of the local DNS server, wherein the server location database includes a plurality of entries, each entry including an IP address and a corresponding geographic location, the server location database identifying one or more entries including an IP address matching the IP address for the local DNS server; andreceiving, from the server location database, the corresponding geographic location from the identified entry as the local DNS server geographic location.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the IP address in the identified entry matches the IP address of the local DNS server when: the IP address in the identified entry is an exact match to the IP address of the local DNS server; orthe IP address of the local DNS server is within a range of IP addresses in the identified entry.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the domain name in the identified entry matches the requested domain name when: the domain name in the identified entry is an exact match to the requested domain name;the requested domain name is within a range of domain names in the identified entry;the identified entry contains a domain name prefix and the requested domain name contains the domain name prefix; orthe requested domain name is a sub-domain of the domain name in the identified entry.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein the global load balancer is further configured to: compare the performance factors for the geographic locations of one or more web servers that match the local DNS server geographic location.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein the performance factor further includes one of the following: a latency, wherein the determining of the web server includes determining the web server with a smallest latency; anda network capacity, wherein the determining of the web server includes determining the web server with a largest network capacity.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the local DNS server geographic location matches the geographic location of the one or more web servers when: the local DNS server geographic location is an exact match to the geographic location of the one or more web servers;the local DNS server geographic location is a sub-area of the geographic location of the one or more web servers;the local DNS server geographic location is within the geographic location of the one or more web servers; orthe local DNS server geographic location is within a predetermine distance from the geographic location of the one or more web servers.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of web servers includes a plurality of server computers servicing the web service requested in the request.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the global load balancer is configured to send the response to the local DNS server by: intercepting the response to the request sent by a global DNS server to the local DNS server;modifying the response by adding at least the network address of the web server to obtain a modified response; andsending the modified response including at least the network address of the web server to the local DNS server.

12. A method for web service load balancing, the method comprising: receiving, by a global load balancer, from a local domain name system (DNS) server, a request for a web service, the local DNS server being coupled to a web client requesting the web service, the request including local DNS server information and a requested domain name;based on the local DNS server information, determining, by the global load balancer, a local DNS server geographic location associated with the local DNS server;based on the web service, determining, by the global load balancer, one or more web servers from a plurality of web servers;based on the requested domain name, querying a web server location database, wherein the web server location database includes a plurality of entries, each entry of the plurality of entries including a domain name, a network address of one of the plurality of web servers, a geographic location of the one of the plurality of web servers, and a performance factor associated with the one of the plurality of web servers;based on the querying, identifying, in the web server location database, one or more entries including the domain name that matches the requested domain name;based on the identified one or more entries and the one or more web servers selected based on the web service, receiving, from the web server location database, network addresses of the one or more web servers, geographic locations of the one or more web servers, and performance factors associated with the one or more web servers;determining, by the global load balancer, if any of the geographic locations of the one or more web servers matches the local DNS server geographic location;based on the matching, selecting, by the global load balancer, from the one or more web servers, a web server based on the performance factors of the one or more web servers wherein the performance factor of each of the one or more web servers includes a processing capability, wherein the selecting the web server includes determining the web server with a best processing capability, the web server being associated with a network address; andsending, by the global load balancer, a response to the local DNS server, the response including at least the network address of the web server.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the local DNS server information includes an IP address of the local DNS server, wherein the determining the local DNS server geographic location includes: querying a server location database using the IP address of the local DNS server, wherein the server location database includes a plurality of entries, each entry including an IP address and a corresponding geographic location, wherein the server location database identifies one or more entries including the IP address matching the IP address for the local DNS server; andreceiving, from the server location database, the corresponding geographic location from the identified entry as the local DNS server geographic location.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the IP address in the identified entry matches the IP address of the local DNS server when: the IP address in the identified entry is an exact match to the IP address of the local DNS server; orthe IP address of the local DNS server is within a range of IP addresses in the identified entry.

15. The method of claim 12, further comprising: comparing the performance factors for the geographic locations of one or more web servers that match the local DNS server geographic location.

16. The method of claim 12, wherein the performance factor further includes one of the following: a latency, wherein the determining of the web server includes determining the web server with a smallest latency; anda network capacity, wherein the determining of the web server includes determining the web server with a largest network capacity.

17. The method of claim 12, wherein the sending the response to the local DNS server includes: intercepting the response to the request sent by a global DNS server to the local DNS server;modifying the response by adding at least the network address of the web server to obtain a modified response; andsending the modified response including at least the network address of the web server to the local DNS server.

18. A system for web service load balancing, the system comprising: a plurality of web servers;a web server location database; anda global load balancer coupled to a local domain name system (DNS) server, wherein the global load balancer is configured to: receive, from the local DNS server, a request for a web service, the local DNS server being coupled to a web client requesting the web service, the request including local DNS server information, wherein the request further includes a requested domain name;based on the local DNS server information, determine a local DNS server geographic location associated with the local DNS server;based on the web service, select one or more web servers from the plurality of web servers;determine a geographic location of the one or more web servers, wherein the determining the geographic location of the one or more web servers includes: querying the web server location database using the requested domain name, wherein the web server location database includes a plurality of entries, each entry of the plurality of entries including a domain name, a network address of one of the plurality of web servers, a geographic location of the one of the plurality of web servers, and a performance factor associated with the one of the plurality of web servers, wherein the web server location database identifies one or more entries including the domain name that matches the requested domain name; andreceiving, from the web server location database, network addresses of the one or more web servers, geographic locations of the one or more web servers, and performance factors associated with the one or more web servers;determine if any of the geographic locations of the one or more web servers matches the local DNS server geographic location;based on the match, select, from the one or more web servers, a web server based on the performance factors of the one or more web servers, wherein the performance factor of each of the one or more web servers includes a processing capability, wherein the selecting the web server includes determining the web server with a best processing capability, the web server being associated with a network address; andsend a response to the local DNS server, the response including at least the network address of the web server.