The present disclosure generally relates to technologies associated with plethysmography, and in particular, to simultaneous measurement of pulmonary ventilation and metabolic rate (e.g., in neonatal rodents).
In recent decades, a host of cellular, molecular, and genetic approaches have been developed to interrogate the inner workings of the motor and sensory components that underlie the control of breathing. It is often critical to buttress these approaches with a behavioral assay, which has led to the widespread use of plethysmography to measure pulmonary ventilation in awake neonatal rodents. Best practice requires correcting changes in ventilation to the corresponding change in metabolic rate, which is the main driver of pulmonary ventilation. This is especially important when studying the response to hypoxia, as metabolic rate drops precipitously in the hypoxic neonate.
The approaches most often used are whole-body and head-out plethysmography. The advantages and disadvantages of each have been widely discussed but can be summarized as follows: In whole body plethysmography, the animal is studied in an enclosed chamber, which allows the animal to be studied awake and unrestrained, and simultaneous measurement of metabolic rate is straightforward. With this method, pressure changes within the chamber are due to both the compression and expansion of alveolar gas as well as changes in volume due to the difference in temperature and humidity between gas in the lungs and gas in the chamber, with the latter contributing proportionally more to the total pressure change. This can be problematic in small animals because the pressure changes due to heating and humidification of inhaled gas are very small, making precise measurements of temperature and humidity critical. As a result, some investigators resort to measuring frequency of breathing only, which results in an incomplete behavioral assessment. To circumvent these issues, head out plethysmography was developed. Here, the animal breathes from the atmosphere, and the remainder of the body is enclosed in a chamber. The gas inhaled from the environment expands the pup's thorax resulting in a change in pressure that is directly proportional to the change in lung volume. While this method makes it easier to measure lung volume changes, the disadvantages include the neck seal used to isolate the head from the chamber which restrains movement as well as the difficulty with measuring metabolic rate.
It is with these observations in mind, among others, that various aspects of the present disclosure were conceived and developed.
The following presents a simplified summary of various aspects described herein. This summary is not an extensive overview and is not intended to identify key or critical elements or to delineate the scope of the claims. The following summary merely presents some concepts in a simplified form as an introductory prelude to the more detailed description provided below. Corresponding apparatus, methods/processes, systems, and computer-readable media are also within the scope of the disclosure.
Various in vitro neonatal rodent models have been developed to study the control of breathing, but translation of the information requires a behavioral assay, which has led to the widespread use of plethysmography to measure breathing in awake neonatal rodents. Best practice requires correcting changes in ventilation to the corresponding change in metabolic rate, which is the main driver of pulmonary ventilation. The presumptive gold standards for measuring pulmonary ventilation and metabolic rate are head out and whole-body plethysmography, respectively. Obtaining measures of both simultaneously is ideal, though technically difficult. Here a simple, inexpensive home-made dual chamber approach for simultaneous measurement of pulmonary ventilation and metabolic rate is described. It was found that the dual chamber provides values for pulmonary ventilation and metabolic rate that compare favorably with the gold standard approaches. It also proved useful for comparing the hypoxic ventilatory response in controls and nicotine exposed neonatal rat pups, which was blunted in the latter.
In general, aspects of the present inventive concept further relate to:
Aspects of the present disclosure can take the form of a system, device, and one or more methods thereof as indicated herein.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding elements among the view of the drawings. The headings used in the figures do not limit the scope of the claims.
Various examples herein relate to an inventive concept that accommodates the simultaneous use of head-out and whole-body plethysmography. A “dual chamber” configuration or design is implemented where an animal can be placed in a head out chamber, and the entire head out chamber is then inserted or otherwise positioned into a larger chamber that is sealed from the environment except for a steady bias flow of gas. Example construction of the chamber is described, and validation data is presented. Using a repeat-measures, randomized experimental design, it was found that the dual chamber configuration provides values for pulmonary ventilation and metabolic rate that compare favorably with values obtained using more traditional approaches.
Dual Chamber Design and Dimensions, and EKG Vest.
Referring to
One example of the inner, head-out first chamber 108 was made from a 60-cc plastic syringe cut to a length of 70 mm. A Luer lock end was implemented and used for calibration via injection of known volumes of air. A 3 mm-diameter hole was drilled into the top and a plastic Luer Lock fitting was epoxied in place and connected to a ¼ inch diameter thick, 4 cm long thick-walled (1 mm) Tygon tube, which is connected to the inflow tube (116) of a Hans-Rudolph pneumotachometer, indicated as pneumotach 120 in
In some examples, the second (outer) chamber 110 can be made from thick-walled (6 mm) Plexiglass with an outer diameter of 50 mm and an inner diameter of 38 mm. The lid 112 and the closed end 111A of the second chamber 110 may each include two ports (ports 118), with one 5 and one 3 mm diameter. The 5 mm holes are threaded to accommodate a 2 mm id nylon hose barb (Masterflex Fittings, item #EW-41517-04) for connecting gas inflow and outflow tubing. The 3 mm holes accommodate passage of the thermocouple and EKG lead wires. The access slot 114 may be formed by a cut into the open end (111B) of the second chamber 110 that is 50 mm long and about 12 mm wide. This allows the inner, head-out first chamber 108 to be inserted easily and accommodates Tygon tubing that is connected to the pneumotach (120). After the head-out chamber 108 is inserted, vacuum grease is applied to the inner surface of the lid 112, and the access slot 114 may be covered with a piece of gum rubber (Gum Rubber Sheet Gasket, 1/16″ Thick, from e.g., Amazon.com®). The gum rubber has a hole sized to accommodate the inflow tube 116 and/or tubing that connects to the pneumotachometer 120 and is 10 mm longer and 20 mm wider than the exposed portion of the access slot 114. The CO2 analyzer (
Exemplary non-limiting dimensions of the device 102 are as follows. The first chamber 108 can be 70 mm long, can include a 2 mm inner diameter (ID), and a 30 mm outer diameter (OD). The second chamber 110 can be 105 mm long, can include a 38 mm ID, and a 50 mm OD. The access slot 114 can be 50 mm long and 12 mm wide. The lid 112 can be 30 mm long and can have a 50 mm ID and a 63 mm OD. The foregoing dimensions can vary depending upon the intended animal to be analyzed; e.g., increased or decreased proportionally as desired for different sized subjects. In other words, the dimensions of both the first chamber 108 and the second chamber 110 can be adjusted for larger (or smaller) animals, though the head-out method is difficult in animals older than P12 as they do not tolerate restraint and often break the neck seal.
For traditional whole-body plethysmography, examples of the device 102 include a smaller version of the second chamber 110 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
In an example test, metabolic rate was measured with the dual chamber device 102 and with standard whole-body plethysmography. The gas analyzer(s) 188 pulled air through the plethysmographs at a rate of 100 ml/min for the standard whole-body plethysmograph, and 150 ml/min for the larger dual chamber (defined by device 102). The effluent gas exiting the device 102 passed through a Dri-Rite canister and then to O2 and CO2 analyzers (iWorx GA 200). The output from the CO2 and O2 sensors was digitized using the Spike II A/D board 190 and software as above (
Validation of the Dual Chamber for In Vivo Plethysmography.
To validate the new dual chamber approach (of device 102) for measuring pulmonary ventilation, a study was conducted of 10 animals (5 male, 5 female) aged P2-P5 in both the standard head out plethysmography chamber and the dual chamber. To evaluate the accuracy of metabolic rate measurements in the dual chamber, it was decided to also measure metabolic rate in a traditional whole-body plethysmograph sized for small animals. Thus, each animal was studied in each of four conditions, with the order of presentation randomized: head-out chamber alone; dual chamber; head-out chamber plus an EKG vest (see below); dual chamber plus the EKG vest. Measurements were made for 30 min in each condition to achieve a steady state, and the animals were given a 30 min recovery between measurements. Key comparisons include inspired VT, breath frequency, their product (pulmonary ventilation rate, {dot over (v)}I), oxygen consumption ({dot over (v)}O2) CO2 production ({dot over (v)}CO2), the respiratory exchange ratio (RER, {dot over (v)}CO2/{dot over (v)}O2), and heart rate.
To validate the dual chamber model under experimental conditions, the rates of ventilation and metabolism were measured in 22 control rat pups (14 male, 8 female) and 22 pups (12 male, 10 female) that were exposed to nicotine during development (developmental nicotine exposure, DNE). The experiment was designed to compare the ventilatory response to a 30 sec exposure to N2, which was done by bleeding gas into the chamber at roughly the same rate at which the gas was removed by the O2/CO2 analyzer pump. To regulate the compressed gas flow rate, a calibrated Rotameter (Matheson) was used. Measurements of the ventilatory and metabolic responses evoked by compressed humified air (control) and compressed humidified N2 (stimulus) were made. Pups were exposed to nicotine via an osmotic minipump that was implanted into the timed-pregnant mother on gestational day four as described previously. The pump was loaded to deliver nicotine bitartrate at a dose of 6 mg/kg/day for 28 days. Pups were studied within the first six days of life, so exposure was via the placenta in utero and through breast milk after birth. In control animals the osmotic pump was loaded with saline.
Statistics.
To compare the different methods for measuring ventilation and metabolism referenced herein, it was decided to apply one-way, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). If the ANOVA was significant, paired contrasts were analyzed with the Bonferroni post hoc procedure. To mitigate effects of differences in body weight, and for ease of comparison with published values, {dot over (v)}I, {dot over (v)}O2 and {dot over (v)}CO2 are expressed as ml*min−1*kg body weight-. The performance of the dual chamber for detecting differences in the ventilatory and metabolic responses to a brief N2 challenge resulting from nicotine exposure was also studied. These experiments were analyzed with a two-way mixed model repeated measures ANOVA, with treatment group (control, DNE) and gas condition (compressed air or compressed N2) the main factors. As above, it was decided to use the Bonferroni post hoc procedure when the ANOVA was significant. All values in the text are expressed as the mean±1 SD. For all tests, statistical significance was defined as a P-value of 0.05. Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used for all statistical analyses.
Results
The age distribution for the 10 pups studied to compare the dual chamber with some selected existing approaches was: P2, N=2; P3, N=3, P4, N=3 and P5, N=2. Body weight ranged from 8.5-12.9 g and averaged 10.9±1.2 g. A representative recording from an animal studied in the device 102 including the dual chamber configuration and wearing the EKG vest 150 is shown in
{dot over (v)}O2 (
Further, heart rate was analyzed in each pup under each of three conditions; resting quietly on a paper towel; in the head-out plethysmograph; and in the dual chamber plethysmograph. Heart rate averaged 354±29 on the paper towel, 368±49 with the pup in the head-out plethysmograph, and 366±24 b/min with the pup in the dual chamber (P=NS,
Referring to
Animals.
All data was obtained from experiments approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The University of Arizona and comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals. A total of 31 male and 23 female animals aged P2-P6 were used, though no sex differences were detected in any of the protocols, so the data are pooled.
Measurements of pulmonary ventilation, metabolic rate, and heart rate obtained with a homemade dual chamber plethysmograph were compared to those measured using the more traditional head-out and unrestrained whole-body plethysmographs, broadly considered as the gold standards for measuring ventilation and metabolism, respectively, in neonatal rodents. In view of these measurements, the dual chamber approach accommodated by the device 102 described herein is believed to be novel and inventive. The validation studies involved recording breathing frequency and VT using both the standard head-out and the dual chamber method in each of 10 pups, ranging in age from P2-P5. Validation of metabolic rate compared values in the dual chamber with those obtained in a whole-body plethysmograph. There was no difference in breathing frequency measured in the head-out versus dual chamber configuration, though VT and {dot over (v)}I were significantly higher in the dual chamber. On average, VI was 20% higher in the dual chamber than in the head-out chamber (1801±393 vs 1445±207 ml*kg*min−1), and the data were more variable (coefficient of variation 22 vs. 14%). However, the difference was consistent, with 9 of the 10 pups having a higher value in the dual chamber than in the head-out chamber. Similarly, both {dot over (v)}O2 and {dot over (v)}CO2 were lower in the dual chamber than in the whole-body plethysmograph in 8 of 10 pups. The RER was similar in both plethysmographs, indicating that the difference in {dot over (v)}O2 and {dot over (v)}CO2 between the chambers were of similar magnitude.
The dual chamber can be used to assess differences between treatment groups, or between interventions within a treatment group. It was not understood the reason for the lower {dot over (v)}O2 in the dual chamber compared to that measured in a traditional, sealed plethysmograph. It could simply be the result of the larger volume required in the dual chamber, which reduces the precision of measures of effluent O2 and CO2 concentrations.
The dual chamber approach evaluated here proved useful for studying the influence of perinatal nicotine exposure on hypoxic sensitivity. This experiment was used because there is data showing that nicotine exposure does reduce some aspects of the hypoxic ventilatory response in one-week-old neonatal rat pups (Fuller et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2010; Simakajornboon et al., 2004; St-John and Leiter, 1999; Zhao et al., 2016), though the differences between nicotine exposed and control animals is small in some studies (e.g., (Robinson et al., 2002) and not detectable in others (Bamford and Carroll, 1999; Bamford et al., 1996). A N2 challenge was used to provide a severe but brief hypoxic stimulus, and the dual chamber approach detected an increase in {dot over (v)}I and {dot over (v)}I/{dot over (v)}O2 in controls. In contrast, the increase in {dot over (v)}I in response to N2 was smaller in the nicotine exposed pups, and {dot over (v)}I/{dot over (v)}O2 did not change in these animals. In conclusion, the dual chamber approach described here adds another option for the simultaneous measurement of pulmonary ventilation and metabolic rate in neonatal rodents. Moreover, the system can be constructed from inexpensive materials making it a good option for investigators that do not want to invest in a commercial plethysmography system.
It should be understood from the foregoing that, while particular embodiments have been illustrated and described, various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are within the scope and teachings of this invention as defined in the claims appended hereto.
This is a non-provisional application that claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/340,600, filed on May 11, 2022, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under Grant No. HD071302 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63340600 | May 2022 | US |