The invention relates to a special plasma source known as a plasma intractor (PI) for generating a cold, homogeneous plasma under atmospheric pressure conditions according to the preamble of claim 1, which source can be used advantageously for excitation and control of reactive processes in flowing media.
By the term “cold” plasma there is understood a nonthermal low-temperature plasma, which is characterized by the following features:
By the term “homogeneous” plasma there is understood here a discharge structure, generated by the device and averaged over the voltage period, that has surprisingly small fluctuations of ? radiation intensity in the visible spectral region, especially in the axial direction relative to the electrode assembly. This property represents a major advantage compared with the filamented structure of common dielectrically hindered discharges under atmospheric pressure.
Numerous plasma sources and plasma technological processes for cleaning or activation of surfaces under atmospheric pressure conditions are described in the technical or patent literature (review article: K. H. Becker et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (2006), R55; M. Laroussi et al., Plasma Process. Polym. 4 (2007), 777 as well as F. Iza et al., Plasma Process. Polym. 5 (2008), 322). When a medium suitable for forming coatings (precursor) is injected in addition to the process gas into the plasma zone, plasma sources of this type may also be used for plasma-assisted coating of surfaces, with the goal of permanently improving the surface properties of a material in terms of chemical resistance, wettability, adhesion, scratch resistance, gas permeability, tribological, optical and dielectric parameters, etc. (examples: J. Jan{hacek over (c)}a et al., Surf. Coat. Technol. 547 (1999), 116; J. Schäfer et al., Plasma Process. Polym. 6 (2009), S519, J. Schäfer et al., Eur. J. Phys. D 54 (2009), 211; Review article: C. Tendero et al., Spectrochimica Acta Part B 61 (2006) 2; L. Bárdos et al., Thin Solid Films 518 (2010), 6705; Patents: U.S. Pat. No. 006,525,481 B1, EP 2209354 A2, WO 2008/074604 A1, WO 2006/092614 A2, WO 2009/073292A1, WO 2009/037331 A1, WO 2009/031886 A2).
The technical solutions of Patents: DE 12059831B4, DE 102007030915A1, DE 10116502A1, US 2009/01888626A1, EP 1375851A1, DE 19534950A1, WO 98/35379) have the following disadvantages:
In contrast to the inventive arrangement, the electrodes are mostly either of axial and central construction (points, needles, etc.) or of radial construction (e.g. annular electrodes). In the first case, the flow of medium around the electrodes leads to disadvantageous flow dynamics (turbulence). In the second case, axial gradients of electric field strength develop, thus preventing an elongated axial source geometry.
Conventional plasma jets often have metallic electrode surfaces, which are in direct contact with the plasma. For a surface treatment, this configuration has proved to be disadvantageous, since electrode erosion allows metal to be transported to the surface to be treated, thus leading to undesired contamination. In addition, increased erosion leads to increased wear and shortened maintenance intervals for plasma sources. Embedding the electrodes in an electrically insulating, robust material proves to be advantageous with respect to the said erosion. However, in the conventional flat geometry (planar or coplanar discharges), at least half of the energy of the electric field is absorbed in the dielectric, and the heat load due to the plasma source must be actively compensated there.
Technical solutions using electrode arrays are known. These are used mostly to increase the area or volume of the entire discharge arrangement. The possibility of finding an optimum for the number of electrodes in the spatial structuring of the electric field, especially in the azimuthal direction in the gas space, is disregarded.
The physical effect of these aspects is involved synergetically in the disadvantage spatial inhomogeneity resulting from filamentation of the plasma and in the development of local physical instabilities of the plasma. This plays a decisive role for process control, when a medium is introduced into the plasma. In conventional plasma sources that generate the plasma under atmospheric pressure conditions in the form of a jet, the medium (for example, a precursor) is admixed directly with the process gas (hereinafter referred to as source gas) or flows through a filamented, primary plasma. In these cases, the reactive process in the medium is space- and time-dependent and accordingly heterogeneous. As a consequence of the heterogeneity, low efficiency of the process is observed in the entire flow cross section of the medium. In practice, the deficit is compensated only partially by stochastic homogenization of the primary plasma or by removal of reaction products from the medium in the immediate vicinity of the primary plasma. Either increased powers or increased flow velocities are suggested as solutions.
In the proposed solution based on increasing the power, the use of the source causes increased thermal load, or the source can be used only in a very restricted zone. From the example of coating of thermally labile surfaces, it can be shown that prolonged action of conventional plasma sources degrades the surface and short-term action causes a strong dependence of the coating quality on the distance between source and surface. At the same time, a homogenizing power increase represents a further restriction for the low-energy processes in the plasma, such as, for example, selective modification of larger precursor molecules, which may be largely destroyed in a high-energy discharge.
In the approach to a homogenization solution based on increasing the flow, the plasma in such sources is made to exit the nozzle in the form of a jet. This jet discharge causes highly turbulent mixing of the plasma with the surrounding atmosphere and thereby is made sensitive to the ambient conditions. Furthermore, processes with longer time scale in the plasma (e.g. processes of collisions with metastable particles) are also restricted. These effects limit the achievable quality of coating and surface modification, and therefore their areas of application are also limited. It is possible that processes requiring conditions that reduce the homogeneous gradient under atmospheric pressure cannot be implemented.
The object underlying the invention is to eliminate the said major disadvantages of the solutions described in the prior art. It relates in particular to novel compensation of the filamentation of the plasma under atmospheric pressure, since this results in strong gradients of the plasma parameters and gas temperature and also in turbulence of the gas flow. The approach to this solution is intended to lead to achievement of a symmetric homogenized discharge structure, which is highly efficient as regards interaction with the medium to be treated in the cross section of the reactive plasma channel and which leads to high reproducibility of the processes relevant to application even under laminar flow rates and with small coupled energy flows.
The object was achieved by construction of a special plasma source known as a plasma intractor (PI) for generating a cold, homogeneous plasma under atmospheric pressure conditions according to the features of the protective claims.
The inventive device for excitation and control of reactive processes in flowing media is a plasma source known as a plasma intractor (PI).
The mode of operation of the plasma source PI is based in general on the principle of coplanar dielectrically hindered discharge (DHD) in a dielectric, preferably ceramic nozzle molded body (1). The DHD is produced in a gas (source gas 6) flowing through the nozzle in cavity (7) under atmospheric conditions. If a suitable medium (5) is mixed in dosed manner into the plasma generated by the DHD (referred to hereinafter as primary plasma 10) through a capillary (4) or tube (the diameter of the arrangement can be scaled from mm to cm in order of magnitude) disposed preferably concentrically in the nozzle, reactive processes are excited in the medium (5). In the case of a gaseous medium (5), this excitation leads to ignition of a secondary discharge (11a) in the medium (5), which flows as effluent (11b) from the capillary (4). The process of coupling of the primary homogeneous plasma into the flowing medium (5) and the resulting generation of the secondary plasma (10) in the medium is the core mechanism of plasma source PI and is known as “plasma intraction”.
High stability, homogeneity and efficiency of plasma intraction is achieved by a new configuration of the electric field in the cavity. In contrast to conventional plasma sources, electrodes (2) are disposed in equidistant, eccentric and elongated relationship in molded body (1), so that the highest field strength of the exciting field is preferably localized in cavity (7). This property leads to an enormous increase in efficiency of the PI. Furthermore, the symmetric arrangement of electrodes (2) ensures optimum distribution of the field strength in the cross section of cavity (7), wherein an elongated mounting of electrodes (2) parallel with the axis of cavity (7) produces gradient-free conditions over greater lengths in axial direction. The number of electrodes is even, while the optimum number of the electrodes can be adapted to the diameter of cavity (7). In nozzles with inside diameter greater than or equal to 4 mm, the minimum number of electrodes for the desired effect is equal to six.
The reactivity of secondary plasma (11) in effluent (11b) is significantly influenced by the energy input released from primary plasma (10) and by the composition of the flowing medium. The coupling can be controlled by the position of the capillary in the nozzle and by the flow velocity of medium (5). The reactive plasma gas mixture can be used for diverse intended applications (e.g. for deposition of thin coatings on the order of nm to pm, surface functionalization of plastics, precision cleaning or even etching).
For excitation of primary plasma (10), the electrodes are biased in pairs in the molded body (see
Properties of coplanar DHD and plasma jets are advantageously combined in the PI, in order to influence the homogeneity of the plasma in the length and the stability of the plasma in the cross section of the nozzle to a particularly positive extent. By virtue of the combination of the symmetric spatial structure of the plasma on the inside wall of cavity (7) and of the laminar axial flow of gas (6), a synergy effect is created, contributing to stabilization and homogenization of the plasma. In this case, the streamlines of the gas are oriented perpendicular to the electric field lines. Thereby the concentrations of long-lived or charged plasma species are uniformly distributed axially. Surprisingly, the discharge structure is visually homogeneous axially even in those source gases that exhibit characteristic filamentation under comparable conditions in other conventional plasma sources.
Because of the homogenizing synergy effect in the PI, the effective boundaries of the discharge structure are expanded and radial transport of the charge carriers in the nozzle can take place from the nozzle wall (10) to the axis of the nozzle. If a medium (5) is introduced into the middle of nozzle (1) through a central capillary (4), a secondary plasma is generated in the medium in the capillary under favorable conditions (flow and chemical composition of the medium). The secondary plasma (11) in the gaseous medium is coupled (“intracted”) to the flow of medium (5), and the reactivity of the medium can be surprisingly carried further away, out of the nozzle. The position in the capillary of the nozzle and the flow parameters of the medium are then decisive for the extent of plasma infraction.
The effect of plasma intraction has several advantages relevant for application. The separately adjustable flow velocity of medium (5) permits efficient regulation of the transport of reaction products without any change in the properties of primary plasma (10). This permits a stable process with slight influence of the distance from the nozzle to the target (the position of removal of reaction products). A homogenized and cylindrically symmetric interaction between primary plasma (10) and medium (5) leads to high efficiency of the process. From the example of layered deposition of SiOx coatings by means of a PI prototype, an unexpectedly high yield was observed thereby, representing savings in time and cost in practice.
A further substantial advantage of the device consists in the low temperature of the secondary plasma. Because of the fact that the secondary plasma is generated not directly in the medium by the primary electric field strength, but instead by the high density of already generated ionizable species of the primary plasma, the mean kinetic temperature of the secondary plasma is largely determined by the neutral temperature of the medium. This also permits processes with thermally labile or biological materials.
The invention will be explained in more detail hereinafter on the basis of some examples, without limiting the invention to these examples.
The reference numerals below are used hereinafter in the drawings:
The core piece of the PI is a molded body (1) with six recesses for electrodes (2) and an axial cylindrical cavity (7). This cavity (7) serves as a gas space for generation of primary plasma (10). The electrodes (2a and 2b) are embedded in the further six recesses, which are arranged equidistantly from one another around the cavity. Coaxially inserted ceramic capillary (4) is used to supply a medium (5), for example an aerosol comprising a carrier gas and a precursor in the case of an application for coatings. Process gas (6) flows through a corresponding opening at the rear end of the nozzle into cavity (7). Primary plasma (10) is localized on the wall of the cavity, while secondary plasma (11) is produced in the axial zone of capillary (4) and has an effect that extends further to the outlet from the nozzle.
The following figures show possible combinations of several individual PIs in an array (
Example 2 shows a schematic diagram of a linear arrangement of five PIs.
Example 3 shows a schematic diagram of a matrix-type arrangement of several PIs.
Example 4 shows the schematic diagram of a concentric arrangement of six PIs.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2011 076 806.8 | May 2011 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/059939 | 5/29/2012 | WO | 00 | 2/19/2014 |