The invention relates to a device for converting a first motion into a second motion responsive to said first motion under a demagnification scale.
The aforementioned device can be considered as a gearbox converting a significantly larger first motion into a demagnified second larger motion. The demand for motion precisions better that 0.1 micrometer is growing in many fields of science and technology (e.g. manipulation tools for nanotechnology, manufacturing and assembly tools for silicon technology (chips and Micro-(Opto)-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMs and MOEMs) production). Achieving such motion accuracies implies severe challenges both in terms of actuation and bearing.
These difficulties result from the unavoidable physical limitations of the traditional actuator and bearing technologies that both generally rely on rolling or sliding bearing elements (ball-bearings, lead screws, etc.). The inherent presence of friction and the associated hysteresis and non linear behavior today limits standard motion system to typically 0.1 micrometer accuracy. To go beyond this barrier, novel technologies must be used: for actuation, piezoelectric actuators are today widely used and for the bearings, flexures have become a standard. This piezo/flexure combination has bear fruit for many applications at nanometer level; it has nevertheless a major drawback which is the associated complex and expensive driving electronics and controller. I.e. piezo require high voltages to be driven and are generally used in conjunction with position feedback sensors because their behavior is non-linear and present hysteresis and drifts. Compared to traditional stepper or DC motors, piezos are much more difficult and expensive to drive.
It is further well known in the state-of-the-art that flexures can be used as a demagnification kinematic chain, but the solutions having an important demagnification ratio (typically between 1:20 and 1:1000) known until today all have a non-linear behavior, i.e. the demagnification factor is not constant over the motion range.
It is therefore the aim of the present invention to provide a device having a motion accuracy better than 0.1 micrometer and being significantly easier in controlling due to the absence of drift and/or hysteresis and/or non-linear behaviour.
This aim is achieved by a device for converting a first motion into a second motion responsive to said first motion under a demagnification scale, comprising:
a) an input portion being drivable in a rectilinear translation in a first direction by an actuator causing said first motion;
b) an output portion being movable by a converting blade causing said second motion responsive to said first motion in a second direction substantially perpendicular to said first direction; and
c) a converting section connecting said input portion to said output portion; said converting section comprising an intermediate spring portion and the converting blade,
c1) wherein said intermediate spring portion comprises at least two parallel flexure blades; and
c2) wherein said converting blade being substantially identical in shape to the a least two parallel flexure blades and being offset from its neutral position by a predetermined amount in the first direction as compared to the neutral position of the at least two parallel flexure blades.
This device has a flexure-based structure that allows combining the advantages of classical actuators with accuracies in the micrometer range and the advantages of flexures to achieve nanometer accuracy. The device is therefore able to convert microns into nanometers in the same way as reduction gearboxes demagnify the angular motion of a classical motors. In the case of the present device both the input and output motions are linear (translations) and not rotational like in the case of a gearbox. The actual motion demagnification results from the differential shorting of the converter blade with respect to the blades of the parallel spring portion when those blades are deformed in a natural S shape. This shorting is parabolic, i.e. proportional to the square of the motion range. Thus, the device is subtracting two identical parabolic motions that are offset by a determined amount which the converting blade is offset relative to the two parallel flexure blades. One can mathematically derive that the resulting motion is a linear demagnification of the input motion, where the demagnification factor is simply: i=5*L/(6*xo), where L is the length of the blades of the parallel spring portion and of the converting blade, and xo the offset of the converting blade relative to the two parallel flexure blades. Due to the subtraction of the two identical parabolic motions, the demagnification is constant over the full stroke of the mechanism: the device is purely linear.
With respect to a design of the device, a suitable structure provides the at least to parallel flexure blades and the converting blade sharing a common base. Thereby, all blades are driven to the same extent into the first direction (responsive to the first motion), whereby the converting blade is bridging the common base and the output portion.
The design of the blades have a relevant impact on the motions achieved. Therefore, the shape of the blade is chosen in a way that both the intermediate spring portion and the output portion move on a parabolic trajectory in response to the first motion. As an outcome of this measure a ratio of the length l to the thickness of the blades shall be much larger than 1. Another outcome is that the ratio of the length l of the blades to the determined offset x0 shall be much larger than 1, too.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the device is manufactured monolithically, i.e. by wire electro-discharge machining, laser cutting, silicon edging. Therefore, the device does not comprise any parts to be assembled which again has an advantageous impact on the removal of unintended sources of drift and hysteresis.
The device has been developed for an optical instrument to be used on at least two beamlines of the Swiss Light Source synchrotron: TOMCAT (Tomographic Microscopy and Coherent Radiology Experiment) and cSAXS (Coherent Small Angle X-ray Scattering). The optical instrument is a Differential Phase Contrast (DPC) Interferometer that can be mounted on standard absorption setups to observe phase shift information. This instrument consists in two optical gratings with pitches of a few microns. One of the gratings must be scanned with a precision of the order of 20 nanometers over a range of typically 30 microns during the x-ray exposure. This device has been designed to perform this scanning motion, using a commercial “pusher” (stepper motor with lead screw and nut, driving an output shaft axially).
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described hereinafter in detail by referring to the following drawings:
The working principle of the converter device CD is rather simple. The converter device CD comprises a rigid frame RF to which the actuator AC is fixed (see
The motion demagnification results from the differential shorting of the converting blade CB with respect to the two flexure blades FB1, FB2 of the parallel spring stage when those blades FB1, FB2 are deformed in a natural S shape. This shorting is parabolic, i.e. proportional to the square of the motion range in x-direction. That means that the base portion BP is transferred with an amount x1 in x-direction and an amount y1 in negative y-direction responsive to a first coarse motion xs in x-direction. Also the converting blade CB has to follow this motion with x1 and y1, but as it was already deflected by x0 on its parabolic trajectory, it moves on a different section of this parabolic trajectory as compared to the two flexure blades FB1, FB2. Thus, the converter device CD is subtracting two identical parabolic motions that are offset by an amount xo. One can mathematically derive that the resulting motion is a linear demagnification of the input motion, where the demagnification factor is simply: i=5*l/(6*xo), where l is the length of the two flexure blades FB1, FB2 of the parallel spring stage and of the concerting blade CB, and xo the offset of the converting blade CB (see
As explained to the
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06021785.8 | Oct 2006 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP07/08754 | 10/9/2007 | WO | 00 | 4/20/2009 |