This application discloses an invention which is related, generally and in various embodiments, to devices utilized for pipe inspection and a method of using the same.
Information from water and sewage pipes has immense environmental, civil, and commercial value. Often, such environments are space constrained and generally ill-suited for people to access and labor. In some instances, compact, sensory-tailored robotic systems are utilized to gather information associated with the pipe environment.
A variety of circumstances can cause the robot's performance to be less than adequate. For example, as illustrated in
Also, as illustrated in
Robots which utilize a conventional track and pulley system often suffer from jamming of the track system 68, thereby rendering the robot immobile. As shown in
In many configurations, compact robots utilized to explore, navigate, map, etc. include a winch mounted to the exterior of the robot. The winch is utilized to reel in the tether, thereby pulling the robot back towards its starting position. Because the tether often operates to carry power and/or control data to the robot, and data from the robot to a device external to the pipe for processing, the tether tends to be relatively large and heavy, thereby adding unnecessary size and weight to the robot. In addition, as shown in
For exterior mounted winch configurations, odometry is traditionally performed by a mechanical counter in contact with the pulley so that the counter increments its count with each revolution of the pulley. In order to avoid corrosion and other problems with the counter, the winch typically requires that a seal be utilized to isolate the counter from the environment in the pipe.
Leaving a manhole cover in an open position for any length of time while the robot is gathering information can also result in the robot's performance being less than ideal. Inside typical underground pipe systems, the temperature is relatively constant (e.g., around 50 degrees Fahrenheit), and the humidity is relatively constant and relatively high. When a manholes cover is left in an open position, cold surface air typically enters the pipe, and a dense fog can form due to the relatively high temperature and humidity of the existing air in the pipe. The fog can be so dense that it can prevent proper visual observation of the pipe wall, thereby preventing some defects from being observed.
In one general respect, this application discloses a device. According to various embodiments, the device includes a sensor portion and a chassis portion. The sensor portion includes a plurality of sensing devices. The chassis portion is connected to the sensor portion and includes a first track and a second track. The second track is positioned adjacent the first track. The first and second tracks cooperate to substantially cover an entire width of the chassis portion.
In another general respect, this application discloses a method for inspecting an interior of a pipe. The method is implemented by a device. According to various embodiments, the method includes traversing the pipe, and capturing data associated with the pipe while the pipe is being traversed. The traversing and the capturing are performed by the device while a manhole through which the device gained access to the pipe is closed.
Aspects of the invention may be implemented by a computing device and/or a computer program stored on a computer-readable medium. The computer-readable medium may comprise a disk, a device, and/or a propagated signal.
Various embodiments of the invention are described herein in by way of example in conjunction with the following figures, wherein like reference characters designate the same or similar elements.
It is to be understood that at least some of the figures and descriptions of the invention have been simplified to illustrate elements that are relevant for a clear understanding of the invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other elements that those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate may also comprise a portion of the invention. However, because such elements are well known in the art, and because they do not facilitate a better understanding of the invention, a description of such elements is not provided herein.
The autonomous mobile robot 10 includes a sensor portion 12 and a chassis portion 14. The sensor portion 12 is electrically and mechanically connected to the chassis portion 14. As shown in
According to various embodiments, the sensor portion 12 includes a plurality of sensing devices (e.g., a camera, a radar device, a sonar device, an infrared device, a laser device, etc.) for sensing the conditions within the environment, a computing device communicably connected to the sensing devices and having a processor for processing raw information captured by the sensing devices, a memory device communicably connected to the computing device for storing the raw and/or processed information, and control circuitry communicably connected to the computing device for controlling various components of the autonomous mobile robot 10. The memory device may also be utilized to store software which is utilized by the autonomous mobile robot 10 to navigate, explore, map, etc. the environment.
As shown in
The first track 18 defines a first surface 18a and a second surface 18h (not shown) opposite the first surface 18a. According to various embodiments, the first surface 18a is the surface which comes in contact with an interior surface of a sewer pipe when the autonomous mobile robot 10 is being utilized for a sewer pipe application. According to various embodiments, the first surface 18a of the first track 18 is substantially smooth. Similarly, the second track 20 defines a first surface 20a and a second surface 20b (not shown) opposite the first surface 20a. According to various embodiments, the first surface 20a is the surface which comes in contact with an interior surface of a sewer pipe when the autonomous mobile robot 10 is being utilized for a sewer pipe application. According to various embodiments, the first surface 20a of the first track 20 is substantially smooth. The respective first surfaces 18a, 20a of the first and second tracks 18, 20 have a relatively high static coefficient of friction. For example, according to various embodiments, the static coefficient of friction of the respective first surfaces 18a, 20a is approximately 1.0. In general, the static coefficient of friction of the respective first tracks 18a, 20a is approximately 0.8 or greater, which allows for good adhesion between the tracks 18, 20 and the interior surface of the sewer pipe.
According to various embodiments, the respective second surfaces 18b, 20b of the first and second tracks 18, 20 are also substantially smooth. For such embodiments, the respective second surfaces 18b, 20b may have a static coefficient of friction which is identical to that of the respective first surfaces 18a, 20a. For embodiments where the respective first surfaces 18a, 20a and the respective second surfaces 18b, 20b of the first and second tracks 18, are substantially smooth, when the respective first surfaces 18a, 20a become too worn, the first and second tracks 18, 20 can be removed and rotated (e.g., the first track 18 takes the place of the second track 20, and the second track 20 takes the place of the first track 18). By taking this action, different edges of the first and second tracks 18, 20 are placed into contact with the interior surface of the sewer pipe. By changing which drive assembly the first and second tracks 18, 20 are utilized with, the usable life of the first and second tracks 18, 20 is effectively doubled.
The first and second tracks 18, 20 may be referred to as full coverage/wide tracks. Due to the collective width of the first and second tracks 18, 20 relative to the width of the chassis portion 14, the first and second tracks 18, 20 collectively form nearly the entire “front”, “bottom” and “rear” surfaces of the chassis portion 14. Thus, when the autonomous mobile robot 10 encounters any debris or feature within the sewer pipe, the first surfaces 18a, 20a of the first and second tracks 18, 20 come in contact with the debris or feature. In contrast to wheeled robots and narrow track robots, the full coverage/wide tracks 18, 20 are configured to enable the autonomous mobile robot 10 to climb over the debris or feature and continue performing the inspection, navigation, mapping, etc. For example, since nearly the entire “front” surface of the autonomous mobile robot 10 is a moving track surface, any debris or feature of sufficient vertical size encountered in the pipe will first hit this moving track surface, and little if any will hit a static part of the chassis portion 14. Also, since nearly the entire “bottom” surface of the autonomous mobile robot 10 is this moving track surface, any encountered debris or feature below the autonomous mobile robot 10 will first hit this moving track surface, and little if any will hit a static part of the chassis portion 14. Additionally, nearly all of the weight of the autonomous mobile robot 10 passes through the moving full coverage/wide tracks 18, 20 to the encountered debris or feature. Therefore, the autonomous mobile robot 10 is configured to always continue driving as the full coverage tracks 18, 20 can not rotate without contacting something to react with and continue driving.
Examples of such an engagement are shown in
Due to the above-described drive assemblies 24, 26 and the self-cleaning full coverage/wide tracks 18, 20 of the autonomous mobile robot 10, the traditional pipe cleaning required prior to the deployment of wheeled robots and narrow track robots may not be necessary prior to the deployment of the autonomous mobile robot 10.
The spindle assembly 29 comprises a tether spindle 40, a drive motor 42 (and a speed-reduction gear train) connected to the tether spindle 40, and a levelwind system 58. As the tether 38 advances past the payout system 59, the tether 38 contacts the levelwind system 58 while passing therethrough, and is wrapped multiple times around the tether spindle 40. The length of tether 38 wrapped around the tether spindle 40 decreases as the robot 10 advances. The levelwind system 58 operates to lay the tether 38 onto the tether spindle 40 in an even manner, thereby preventing the tether 38 from bulging up at only one location on the tether spindle 40.
In contrast to traditional systems where the tether is pulled through the pipe from a reel external to the pipe, the autonomous mobile robot 10 lays tether 38 statically into the inspected pipe from the autonomous mobile robot 10. Therefore, the autonomous mobile robot 10 experiences much less drag from its tether 38 than traditional systems, resulting in increased mobility and capability in inspecting pipe. The autonomous mobile robot 10 is generally freed of towed-tether related drag and snag issues, allowing the autonomous mobile robot 10 to have equal or better mobility than traditional inspection platforms, while having a smaller & lighter physical profile and lower power consumption.
According to various embodiments, the robot 10 is approximately 500 millimeters in length, approximately 120 millimeters in width, and approximately 125 millimeters in height. The relatively compact physical size of the robot 10, when combined with the drive system described hereinabove, allows the robot 10 to bypass obstacles that a larger platform would be unable to traverse. According to various embodiments, the robot 10 is waterproof (e.g., to IP68 or better, and positively pressurized) so it can drive through flooded pipe bellies and is easily disinfected by immersion in a cleaning solution after use. According to various embodiments, the reel storage area, payout measurement area, and all passageways leading to and from are unsealed and flood when the robot 10 is submerged. For such embodiments, the rest of the robot 10, including the interiors of the chassis portion 14 and sensor portion 12, is isolated from the external environment through a combination of o-rings, shaft seal, and/or cured compounds.
For instances where the manhole cover is in the closed position during the inspection, the pipe environment is isolated from the surface environment. By closing the manhole after the robot 10 is lowered, the amount of cold surface air which enters the pipe being inspected is limited, and the amount of fog produced by the cold surface air is similarly limited. Also, by delaying the start of the inspection until some period of time after the manhole is closed, any fog initially produced by the cold surface air can disperse, thereby providing the autonomous mobile robot 10 with better inspection conditions in the pipe. Additionally, by delaying the start of the inspection to perform the inspection at an optimal time (e.g., in the middle of the night when water levels are generally lowest), more of the pipe surfaces can be visually recorded and therefore more defects observed in subsequent analysis.
A tiger tail system may be installed around to the tether 38. The tiger tail system includes a sleeve, and a bar or other member coupled to the sleeve. Once the robot 10 is lowered to the pipe and begins to advance, the sleeve operates to prevent the tether 38 from fraying due to contact with an edge of the pipe where the bottom of the chimney meets the opening of the pipe. The sleeve may be fabricated from any suitable material (e.g., plastic), and the tether 38 passes therethrough. The bar or other member is generally perpendicular to the sleeve, has a length which is greater than the diameter of the pipe, and operates to properly position the sleeve relative to the pipe opening. In contrast to the traditional installation by a member of the crew at the edge of the pipe opening, the tiger tail system is self installing. When the robot 10 advances into the pipe, the sleeve is pulled into place and the bar is pulled across the pipe opening, thereby securing the sleeve in place without the assistance of a crew member.
Once the pipe inspection is completed, the winch assembly 28 may be utilized to return the robot 10 back to the starting manhole, where the winch assembly 28 then operates to automatically lift the robot 10 up out of the bottom of the manhole and into the chimney where it hangs until it is retrieved. By removing itself from the pipe and the bottom of the manhole, the robot 10 removes itself as a potential impediment to flow within the pipe and manhole. The retrieval of the robot 10 can take place at any time later, at the convenience of the crew, and is a simple matter of opening the manhole and lifting out the suspended waiting robot 10 by removing the hanger. According to other embodiments, the autonomous mobile robot 10 can drive back to the starting manhole while retrieving tether 38 and wait at the bottom of the manhole for the crew to return. For such embodiments, the crew may retrieve the robot 10 by removing the hanger and then using the telescoping deployment pole to lift the robot 10 out from the manhole.
Nothing in the above description is meant to limit the invention to any specific materials, geometry, or orientation of elements. Many part/orientation substitutions are contemplated within the scope of the invention and will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The embodiments described herein were presented by way of example only and should not be used to limit the scope of the invention.
Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments in this application, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of the teachings herein, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of, or exceeding the scope of, the described invention. Accordingly, it is understood that the drawings and the descriptions herein are proffered only to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of the earlier filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/110,870 filed on Nov. 3, 2008.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3562642 | Hochschild | Feb 1971 | A |
3672785 | Byrne | Jun 1972 | A |
4029428 | Levens | Jun 1977 | A |
4179216 | Theurer et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4197908 | Davis et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4431017 | Willemsen | Feb 1984 | A |
4437526 | Gloor | Mar 1984 | A |
4442891 | Wood | Apr 1984 | A |
4577388 | Wood | Mar 1986 | A |
4613812 | Gelston, II | Sep 1986 | A |
4630676 | Long, Jr. | Dec 1986 | A |
4648454 | Yarnell | Mar 1987 | A |
4675604 | Moyer et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4701988 | Wood | Oct 1987 | A |
4724108 | Jurgenlohmann et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4725883 | Clark et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4765173 | Schellstede | Aug 1988 | A |
4800104 | Cruickshank | Jan 1989 | A |
4819721 | Long, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4822211 | Shinoda et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825969 | King et al. | May 1989 | A |
4862808 | Hedgcoxe et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4951758 | Sonku et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955951 | Nemoto et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5018545 | Wells | May 1991 | A |
5044824 | Long, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5063780 | Landry et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5088553 | Ralston et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5105882 | Ralston et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5150989 | Long, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5195392 | Moore et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197540 | Yagi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5272986 | Smart | Dec 1993 | A |
5315770 | Campbell | May 1994 | A |
5318395 | Driver | Jun 1994 | A |
5329824 | Carapezza et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5387092 | Pettitt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5454276 | Wernicke | Oct 1995 | A |
5520569 | Endoh | May 1996 | A |
5565633 | Wernicke | Oct 1996 | A |
5571977 | Kipp | Nov 1996 | A |
5574223 | Kiefer | Nov 1996 | A |
5577864 | Wood et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5608847 | Pryor | Mar 1997 | A |
5700110 | Kamiyama et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5736821 | Suyama | Apr 1998 | A |
5742517 | Van Den Bosch | Apr 1998 | A |
5773984 | Suyama et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794431 | Utamura et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5878783 | Smart | Mar 1999 | A |
5892163 | Johnson | Apr 1999 | A |
5947051 | Geiger | Sep 1999 | A |
5947213 | Angle et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960882 | Polivka | Oct 1999 | A |
5975878 | Wood et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992247 | Manestar | Nov 1999 | A |
6026911 | Angle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6039079 | Kiest, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056017 | Kamiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068725 | Tweedie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082411 | Ward | Jul 2000 | A |
6141810 | Allen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155363 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162171 | Ng et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173562 | Utamura et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175380 | Van Den Bosch | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202400 | Utamura et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243483 | Petrou et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243657 | Tuck et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6377734 | Mayr et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378627 | Tubel | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386797 | Gearhart | May 2002 | B1 |
6405798 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427602 | Hovis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431270 | Angle | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446718 | Barrett et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450104 | Grant et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6571492 | Greenwood | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6661524 | Smith et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6684706 | Knight et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695013 | Warren | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697710 | Wilcox | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6745955 | Kronz | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6843317 | Mackenzie | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845819 | Barrett et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6887014 | Holland | May 2005 | B2 |
6898936 | Ochs et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6964309 | Quinn et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7009698 | Drost et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7042184 | Oleynikov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053391 | Blume | May 2006 | B2 |
7069124 | Whittaker et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073979 | McGrew et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7126303 | Farritor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131791 | Whittaker et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137465 | Kerrebrock et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7148962 | Fuhrland et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7191191 | Peurach et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7210364 | Ghorbel et | May 2007 | B2 |
7434757 | Beckham | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7460980 | Hinn | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7594448 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7680625 | Trowbridge et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
8225667 | Hanan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020062177 | Hannaford et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030089267 | Ghorbel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030164952 | Deichmann et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172871 | Scherer | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198374 | Hagene et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216836 | Treat et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040021858 | Shima et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055746 | Ross et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088080 | Song et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040175235 | Whittaker et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211894 | Hother et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050104600 | Cotton | May 2005 | A1 |
20050228573 | Gangopadhyay | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288819 | de Guzman | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060066847 | Penza | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074525 | Close et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060290779 | Reverte et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070131438 | Brandt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153918 | Rodriguez | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070234702 | Hagen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080179115 | Ohm et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090037146 | Trowbridge et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100218624 | Atwood et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110026770 | Brookshire | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037311 | Stolkin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120097461 | Rudakevych | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120199407 | Morey et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211287 | Andrus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120292120 | Ben-Tzvi | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
397432 | Apr 1994 | AT |
19627455 | Jan 1998 | DE |
462527 | Dec 1991 | EP |
1469215 | Apr 1977 | GB |
2091611 | Aug 1982 | GB |
2408340 | May 2005 | GB |
05131381 | May 1993 | JP |
10286878 | Oct 1998 | JP |
PCTUS2009063129 | Feb 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ISA Written Opinion. |
Remote Orbital Installations LLC, website, roi360.com/equipment, downloaded Oct. 2007, 4 pages. |
Remote Orbital Installations LLC, TRANSPOD Product Brochure; date unknown , but by Jun. 2011, 3 pages. |
Cues Inc., CUES-IMX Product Brochure; date unknown , but by Jun. 2011, 2 pages. |
Cues Inc., Quick ZoomCam Product Brochure; date unknown, but at least 1st 2 of 4 pages downloaded Oct. 2007 at http://www.cuesinc.com/Quick-Zoom.html. |
“EPA Collection Systems O&M Fact Sheet Sewer Cleaning and Inspection”, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 832-F-99-031, Sep. 1999, 11 pages. |
Hirose, et al., “Design of In-Pipe Inspection Vehicles phi50, phi150 pipes”, IEEE, pp. 2309-2314, 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, May 1999. |
Kawaguchi et al., “An Efficient Algorithm of Path Planning for an Internal Gas Pipe Inspection Robot”, IEEE, pp. 1155-1160, 1992 Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Jul. 1992. |
Bertetto, et al., “Robot Flessibile a BAsso Costo Per Ispezioni Tuni”, Internet, 2006 p. 1477, an abstract only. |
Torbin, “Advanced Inspection Robot for Unpiggable Pipelines”, Internet, pp. 1-9, 2006. |
Jin-Wu et al., A Pipeline Inspection Micro Robot Based on Screw Motion Wheels Intervent, 2000, p. 235-238, Journal of Shanghai University (English Edition ) ISSN 1007-6417, vol. 4, No. 3 (Sep. 2000). |
Kawaguchi et al., Internal Pipe Inspection Robot, 1995, IEEE, p. 857-862, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 0-7803-1965-6/95. |
Ryew et al., Inpipe Inspection Robot System with Active Steering Mechanism, 2000, IEEE, p. 1652-1657. |
Ono et al., Development of an In-pipe Inspection Robot Movable for a Long Distance, 2001, Internet, p. 1-4, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. |
Choi et al., Development of Articulated Robot for Inspection of Underground Pipelines, 1999, Internet, p. 407-414, Transactions of the 15th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT-15), in August. |
Grobmann et al., A Robot Control System Integrating Reactive Control, Reasonong, and Execution Monitoring, 2002, Internet p. 1-16, Technical Report WV-03-02/CL-2003-01. |
Musliner et al., Execution Monitoring and Recovery Planning with Time, 1991, p. 1-4. |
Jeng et al., Reliable Automated Manufacturing System Design Based on SMT Framework, 1998, Internet, p. 121-147, Computers in Industry 35. |
Schempf et al., Neptune: Above-Ground Storage Tank Inspection Robot System, 1995, IEEE, p. 1-7, IEEE Robotics & Automation, Society Magazine, Issue: Jun. 1995. |
Choi et al., Feeder Pipe Inspection Robot With an Inch-Worm Mechanism Using Pneumatic Actuators, International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 4, No. 1, Feb. 2006, p. 87-95. |
Silva, Intelligent Control of Robotic Systems with Application in Industrial Process, 1997, p. 221-237, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 21. |
Nitzan, Three-Dimensional Vision Structure for Robot Applications, IEEE, 1988, p. 291-309, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 10, No. 3 in May. |
Yamada et al., A Method of 3D Object Reconstruction by Fusing Vision with Touch Sensing Using Internal Models with Global and Local Deformations, IEEE, 1993, p. 782-787. |
Gu et al., Interpretation of Mechanical Impedance Profiles for Intelligent Control of Robotic Meat Processing, IEEE, 1996, p. 507-512. |
Jung et al., Adaptive Force Tracking Impedance Control of Robot for Cutting Nonhomogeneous Workpiece, IEEE, 1999, p. 1800-1805, proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, in May. |
Wang et al., Application of Force Control on the Working Path Tracking, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 10, No. 2, 2002, p. 98-103. |
Xiao et al., Sensor-Based Hybrid Position/Force Control of a Robot Manipulator in an Uncalibrated Environment, IEEE, No. 4, Jul. 2099. |
Lawson S.W. & Pretlove, Augmented Reality for Underground Pipe Inspection and Maintenance, Mechatronic Systems and Robotics Research Group, 1998, p. 1-7. |
Roth H & Schilling K., Inspection and Repair Robots for Waste Water Pipes—A Challenge to Sensorics and Locomotion, IEEE, 1998, p. 476-478. |
Schenker, Paul S., Advanced Man-Machine Interfaces and Control Architecture for Dexterous Teleoperations, IEEE, 1991, p. 1506-1525. |
International Search Report for corresponding International Application PCT/US09/63129, Feb. 3, 2010 was mail date, 3 pages, no written opinion included. |
Rokke, Pette, and Johan E. Hustad, “Exhaust Gas Recirculation in Gas Turbines for Reduction of CO2 Emissions; Combustion Testing with Focus on Stability and Emissions”, Int. Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 167-173, Sep. 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100218624 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61110870 | Nov 2008 | US |