1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to medical apparatus and methods, and more specifically to vascular catheters, stents and stent delivery systems for use in the coronary and peripheral arteries as well as other vessels and body lumens.
Stenting is an important treatment option for patients with vascular occlusive disease. The stenting procedure involves placing a tubular prosthesis at the site of a lesion, typically within a diseased artery. The procedure is performed in order to maintain the patency of the artery and is often performed after a primary treatment such as angioplasty. Early stent results suffered from high rates of restenosis, i.e. the tendency for the stented artery to become re-occluded following implantation of the stent. However, in recent years, restenosis rates have decreased substantially, due in part to drug eluting stents as well as other improvements in stent delivery methods and stent technology. As a result, the number of stent related procedures being performed worldwide continues to dramatically increase.
Stents are typically either self-expanding or balloon expandable and they are delivered to the arteries using long, flexible vascular catheters typically inserted percutaneously through the patient's femoral artery. For balloon expandable stents, the stents are usually mounted over a balloon on the delivery catheter, thus, when the balloon is inflated, the balloon expands and correspondingly expands and deforms the stent to the desired diameter. The balloon can then be deflated and removed, leaving the stent in place. For self-expanding stents, the stent is simply released from the delivery catheter so that it resiliently expands into engagement with the vessel wall. Self-expanding stents are often used in the peripheral vascular system since they are more resilient than balloon expandable stents. Resilient stents are better suited for implantation into regions of the body closer to the body's surface, such as a peripheral artery, since the stent's resilience helps minimize damage or crushing caused by body movement or externally applied forces.
Self-expanding stents may also be used in the coronary arteries and may provide advantages over balloon expandable stents. Balloon expandable stents are expanded with a balloon typically having a constant diameter. Thus, an expanded stent may not conform well to a coronary artery having variations in diameter due to tortuosity or taper. Therefore, there is a potential for gaps between the outer stent surface and the inner surface of the artery wall. These gaps may lead to thrombus formation and recently, there has been concern that this effect is pronounced in drug eluting stents because the drug delays endothelialization of the stent surface, allowing the gaps to remain for a longer period of time. This may be avoided with self-expanding stents that expand until the outer stent surface is constrained by contact with a vessel wall. Therefore, gaps between the stent and the arterial wall are minimized thereby helping to reduce thrombus formation. Companies such as Devax (Irvine, Calif.) and Cardiomind (Sunnyvale, Calif.) are developing self-expanding stents for implantation into the coronary arteries.
While self-expanding stent technology is promising, accurate delivery of the stents to a treatment site can present a challenge. Because self-expanding stent segments tend to rapidly spring open upon deployment, it is often difficult to control their placement. In some cases, the stents may actually eject or jump away from the delivery catheter. Therefore, a delivery system that allows more precise control of stent deployment and placement is desirable.
Current stent delivery technology suffers from some other potential drawbacks which can make delivery of stents challenging. In particular, current stent delivery catheters often employ stents having fixed lengths. The proper selection of fixed length stents requires accurate knowledge of the lesion length being treated. While lesion length may be measured prior to stent deployment using angiography and fluoroscopy, these measurements are often inaccurate. Thus, if an incorrectly sized stent is introduced to a treatment site, it must be removed from the patient along with the delivery catheter and replaced with a different device having the correct stent size. This prolongs the procedure, increases waste and results in a more costly procedure.
Additionally, and especially in the case of peripheral vascular disease, lesions are often long and diffuse. A single long stent may be deployed to treat a single lesion or to span multiple lesions, however this is not optimal since longer stents tend to have higher fracture rates as well as restenosis rates as compared with shorter stents. Therefore, placement of multiple shorter stents in a long lesion may be advantageous instead of deploying a single long length stent.
The use of “custom length” stents as an alternative to fixed length stents has been proposed. One such approach for providing a custom length stent has been to use segmented stents for treatment in which only some of the stents are deployed for treatment. Several exemplary systems are described in several copending, commonly assigned applications which are listed below. In these systems, the stent segments are deployed by selective advancement over the delivery catheter. After delivering an initial group of segments, the catheter may be repositioned to a new treatment site and a further group of segments can then be deployed. These systems enable treatment of multiple lesions with a single device and may contain up to fifty segments.
Another challenge with existing “custom length” stent delivery systems is that to deliver multiple stent segments to multiple lesion sites requires an intricate delivery system that can be somewhat complex to use. Thus, a simpler delivery system that allows length customization is desirable, especially for use in treating long lesions in the peripheral and coronary vasculature.
For the reasons above, as well as others, it would be desirable to provide improved prosthetic stents and delivery catheters that allow better control of stent length and deployment. It would be particularly desirable to provide catheters which enable stent length to be customized using multiple stent segments. It is also desirable to provide a delivery system that is flexible and can track torturous vessels and that has a simple construction and is less costly and easy to use in deploying a selectable number of stent segments to a treatment site. It is further desirable to provide a stent delivery catheter that can control the delivery and placement of self-expanding stents in the peripheral and coronary vascular system.
2. Description of the Background Art
Prior publications describing catheters for delivering multiple segmented stents include: U.S. Publication Nos. 2004/0098081, 2005/0149159, 2004/0093061, 2005/0010276, 2005/0038505, 2004/0186551 and 2003/013266. Prior related unpublished co-pending U.S. patent applications include Ser. No. 11/148,713, filed Jun. 8, 2005, entitled “Devices and Methods for Operating and Controlling Interventional Apparatus”; Ser. No. 11/148,545, filed Jun. 8, 2005, entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Deployment of Multiple Custom-Length Prosthesis”; Ser. No. 11/344,464, filed Jan. 30, 2006, entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Deployment of Custom-Length Prostheses”; Ser. No. 60/784,309, filed Mar. 20, 2006, entitled “Apparatus and Methods for Deployment of Linked Prosthetic Segments”; Ser. No. 11/469,773 filed Sep. 1, 2006, entitled “Custom Length Stent Apparatus”; and Ser. No. 11/462,951, filed Aug. 7, 2006, entitled “Custom Length Stent Apparatus.” The full disclosures of each of these patents and applications are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention generally provides for the delivery of self-expanding prostheses with a flexible delivery catheter capable of navigating vessels such as the peripheral and coronary arteries. The delivery catheter permits controlled deployment of a selectable number of prosthetic segments at a treatment site, thus allowing customization of prosthesis length while the delivery catheter is in a body lumen at a treatment site. Customization of prosthesis length in situ permits better matching of the prosthesis length to the lesion length being treated.
The terms “stent” and “stenting” are defined to include any of the array of expandable prostheses and scaffolds which are introduced into a lumen at a target treatment site and expanded in situ thereby exerting a radially outward force against the lumen wall. The prosthesis of the present invention comprises a closed or an open lattice structure and is typically fabricated from an elastic material or self-expanding material, including superelastic materials such as nickel-titanium alloys like Nitinol, or spring temper stainless steels or polymers, and the lattice structures are commonly constrained radially during delivery and upon deployment the constraining structure is removed, allowing the prosthesis to “self-expand” at the target site. The terms “stent,” “prosthesis,” “prosthetic segment” and “stent segment” refer broadly to all radially expansible stents, grafts, and other scaffold-like structures which are intended for deployment within a body lumen.
In a first aspect of the present invention, a catheter for delivering a prosthesis to a treatment site in a body lumen comprises a pusher tube having a proximal end and a distal end and a sheath that is slidably disposed over the pusher tube. The catheter includes one or more self-expanding tubular prostheses that are carried within the sheath. The sheath constrains the one or more prostheses in a radially contracted configuration and the one or more prostheses are independently releasable from the sheath as the sheath is retracted relative to the pusher tube. The pusher tube is adapted to prevent proximal motion of the one or more self-expanding prostheses as the sheath is retracted. The one or more prostheses resiliently expand upon release from the sheath. The catheter also includes a radially expandable control member that is positionable within the one or more prostheses and that has an expanded shape which engages an inner surface of at least one of the one or more prostheses to exert an outward force against the prosthesis. This urges the prosthesis outwardly against an interior surface of the sheath. The control member is also axially movable with the sheath so that it slides relative to the prostheses that are in engagement therewith as the sheath is retracted relative to the pusher tube. The catheter may further comprise a handle near the proximal end of the pusher tube. The handle often has a control mechanism adapted to actuate the sheath and the radially expandable control member during deployment of the self-expanding prostheses. The pusher tube may be proximal to the self-expanding prostheses and may be adapted to engage a prosthesis in the sheath for retrieval thereof, thereby preventing the prosthesis from being deployed. The catheter may also comprise an elongate flexible member that is disposed at least partially under the pusher tube. Sometimes the elongate flexible member has a lumen therethrough that is adapted to receive a guidewire.
In another aspect of the present invention, a catheter for delivering a prosthesis to a treatment site in a body lumen comprises a pusher tube having a proximal end and a distal end, and a sheath with a distal tip. The sheath is slidably disposed over the pusher tube. The catheter also has one or more self-expanding tubular prostheses carried within the sheath. The sheath constrains the prostheses in a radially contracted configuration and the prostheses are independently releasable from the sheath as the sheath is retracted relative to the pusher tube. The prostheses resiliently expand upon release from the sheath. A radially expandable control member is positioned within the prostheses and has an expanded shape which engages an inner surface of at least one of the prostheses to exert an outward force against the prosthesis so as to urge it outwardly against the sheath. The control member is axially movable with the sheath so as to slide relative to the prosthesis in engagement therewith as the sheath is retracted relative to the pusher tube. The distal tip of the sheath is also interactive with the control member to enable a prosthesis to be trapped therebetween to inhibit the prosthesis from jumping distally upon expansion. The catheter may also have a handle near the proximal end of the pusher tube. The handle often has a control mechanism that is adapted to actuate the sheath and the radially expandable control member during deployment of the self-expanding prostheses. The pusher tube is adapted to prevent proximal motion of the one or more self-expanding prostheses as the sheath is retracted and may be proximal to the self-expanding prostheses. The pusher may also be adapted to engage a prosthesis in the sheath for retrieval thereof, thereby preventing the prosthesis from being deployed. The catheter may also comprise an elongate flexible member that is disposed at least partially under the pusher tube. Sometimes the elongate flexible member has a lumen therethrough that is adapted to receive a guidewire.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method of delivering a prosthesis to a treatment site in a body lumen comprises positioning a delivery catheter at the treatment site. The delivery catheter may have one or more self-expanding tubular prostheses thereon and the prostheses are usually covered by a sheath. Retracting the sheath exposes a prosthesis which resiliently expands radially into contact with a wall of the body lumen. A control member slidably coupled to the delivery catheter is radially expanded. The control member engages an interior surface of the prosthesis as the sheath is retracted. The control member is retracted in conjunction with the sheath and exerts an outward force against the prosthesis to urge the prosthesis outwardly against the sheath to maintain the axial position of the prosthesis relative to the delivery catheter as the prosthesis is released from the sheath. The self-expanding tubular prosthesis is then released from the delivery catheter into the body lumen.
Often, releasing the prosthesis comprises collapsing the radially expandable control member so that the control member disengages from the inner surface of the prosthesis. Sometimes, releasing the prosthesis comprises deflating a balloon. The method may further comprise retracting the control member axially in conjunction with the sheath so as to slide relative to the prosthesis in engagement therewith. Engaging the prosthesis may comprise inflating a balloon. Sometimes, another prosthesis is retained in the sheath after the prosthesis is released.
Often, the radially expandable control member is metal although it may be a polymer and comprises a plurality of elongate struts disposed distal to the pusher tube. The struts may be resilient and can bend outwardly under compression. Often the expandable member is a basket having a plurality of flexible strands. Some of the strands may be axially oriented and bend outwardly under compression. Often the strands are metal, although they may be a polymer. Sometimes the expandable member comprises a polymer and may be a balloon. The radially expandable control member may engage at least two self-expanding prostheses simultaneously.
The sheath may be adapted to be retracted while the pusher tube remains fixed relative to the handle so as to expose at least one of the self-expanding tubular prostheses for deployment. Sometimes the sheath has a distal tip that is interactive with the control member to enable a self-expanding prosthesis to be trapped therebetween to inhibit the prosthesis from jumping distally upon expansion. The distal tip may be flared and often is expandable as the prosthesis expands. Sometimes the distal tip has a plurality of axial slits.
A distal end of the sheath may radially expand or flare outwardly as the self-expanding prostheses expand. Often an outward force exerted by the control member or the self-expanding prostheses expands the distal sheath end. When the distal end of the sheath is axially split into sections, the sections deflect outwardly as the prostheses expand. Usually, the distal end of the sheath resiliently returns to a non-expanded shape following release of the desired number of prostheses or when the control member is retracted back into the sheath.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a self-expanding tubular prosthesis comprises a plurality of self-expanding tubular rings having a plurality of axial struts and a plurality of connectors coupling adjacent struts together. The axial struts and the connectors often form a zig-zag pattern. A bridge member couples adjacent tubular rings together and the prosthesis also has an interlocking tab coupled to a tubular ring on one end of the tubular prosthesis with a flexible connector. The interlocking tab is adapted to interlock with an adjacent prosthesis prior to expansion of the prosthesis and the flexible connector also allows radial flexing of the interlocking tab relative to the tubular prosthesis.
The plurality of connectors are often substantially U-shaped and the bridge member is often sigmoidal shaped. Usually, the bridge member is coupled to at least one of the plurality of connectors. Sometimes, a first bridge member on a proximal end of the prosthesis has a first slope and a second bridge member on a distal end of the prosthesis has a second slope opposite of the first slope. The interlocking tab may comprise an enlarged head region and a narrower neck region. The enlarged head region often comprises an arcuate strut that defines a narrow inlet portion and a wider receiving portion with the receiving portion adapted to receive and interlock with an interlocking tab on an adjacent prosthesis. The receiving portion also may have a surface that is substantially transverse to a longitudinal axis of the prosthesis. This surface allows the prosthesis to be pushed in a direction that is substantially parallel to the longitudinal axis. Sometimes, the interlocking tab may have a strut which defines an aperture for holding a radiopaque marker.
The catheter may have a plurality of self-expanding prostheses. The prostheses often have a length in the range of about 2 mm to about 50 mm. Sometimes each of the prostheses may have the same length or at least one of the prostheses has a length different than at least another of the prostheses. Often the prostheses have ends in engagement with one another prior to deployment. Sometimes the prostheses are axially connected to each other when in the sheath and they may disconnect from one another upon expansion. The self-expanding tubular prostheses often carry a therapeutic agent adapted to being released therefrom and sometimes the agent is an anti-restenosis agent.
These and other embodiments are described in further detail in the following description related to the appended drawing figures.
Referring now to
In the present embodiment shown in
As shown in
Handle 106 includes a housing 110 which encloses the internal components of the handle 106. Handle 106 allows a physician operator to advance or retract outer sheath 124 and radially expandable control member 130. The amount of retraction of sheath 124 determines the number of individual prostheses 128 to be deployed thereby establishing the overall length of prosthesis 126, while ensuring accurate delivery of the individual prostheses 128. The inner shaft 134 is preferably fixed to the handle housing 110, although in some embodiments it may also be operatively coupled with handle 106 to be axially moveable. Both outer sheath 124 and radially expandable control member 130 are coupled to slide mechanisms 102 and 140, respectively. Slide mechanisms 102 and 140 allow both the outer sheath 124 and radially expandable control member 130 to be retracted and advanced relative to handle 106. Optionally, a single slide mechanism could be used to control motion of the outer sheath 124 and radially expandable control member 130.
Slide mechanism 102 is coupled with outer sheath 124 and translates along calibrated slot 104. Slide mechanism 102 is adapted to retract the outer sheath 124 a selected distance so that the self-expanding tubular prostheses 128 may be exposed for delivery. The radially expandable control member 130 is operatively coupled with outer sheath 124 and therefore slide mechanism 102 also retracts radially expandable control member 130 with sheath 124. A small offset is built into the slide mechanism 102 so that outer sheath 124 may be retracted a short distance prior to engaging and retracting expandable control member 130. This offset is approximately 2 mm to 50 mm and allows the radially expandable control member 130 to expand along with the prosthesis 128 once the constraint provided by outer sheath 124 has been removed. As sheath 124 is retracted, the distal most section of prosthesis 128 begins to expand along with the radially expandable control member 130. As slide 102 is further retracted, outer sheath 124 engages and cooperatively retracts with control member 130. Additional details on the operation of sheath 124 and radially expandable control member 130 are described below. The slide mechanism 102 includes visual markers 148 so that an operator can easily determine the length or number of prostheses that have been exposed. In preferred embodiments, slide mechanism 102 may have detents or a ratchet that provides audible or tactile feedback to the operator to facilitate operation of the stent delivery catheter 100 without requiring direct visualization during operation.
Handle 106 also comprises a second control mechanism 140 that translates along calibrated slot 142. Slide mechanism 140 is coupled with the radially expandable control member 130 and is adapted to retract or advance the control member 130 independently of outer sheath 124. For example, after the number of prosthetic segments 128 has been selected, exposed and deployed as described above, radially expandable control member 130 may be removed from within the deployed stent segments 128 and this may be accomplished by retracting slider 140 so as to collapse the radially expandable control member 130 back into outer sheath 124. In alternative embodiments, sheath 124 may be advanced over the radially expandable control member 130 thereby collapsing it. Slide mechanism 140 also includes visual markers 150 that help the physician determine the position of the control member relative to sheath 124. Additionally, the slide mechanism 140 may comprise detents or a ratchet that further assists physician operation by providing audible or tactile feedback. Further details on operation of the radially expandable control member 130 and the outer sheath 124 are discussed below.
Handle 106 also permits optional connection of an external fluid source via adapter 108 attached to the proximal end of handle 106. Fluid may then be injected at the proximal handle end and infused along a lumen in inner shaft 134 into a patient via infusion ports (not shown) near the distal end of the delivery catheter 100 or via the distal exit port 156. Adaptor 108, preferably a Luer connector, is configured to be fluidly coupled with a fluid source such as a syringe or intravenous bag. In alternative embodiments adaptor 108 may be fluidly connected to an inflation lumen in inner shaft 134 which is connected to an inflatable control member at the distal end of the catheter. The inflatable control member may be a balloon. An inflation device which may be any commercially available balloon inflation device such as those sold under the trade name “Indeflator™,” manufactured by Abbott (formerly Guidant Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif.) may then be connected to adaptor 108 to deliver an inflation fluid to the control member.
Additional details on materials and construction of other suitable handles and control mechanisms are described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/148,713, filed Jun. 8, 2005, entitled “Devices and Methods for Operating and Controlling Interventional Apparatus,” and co-pending United States Publication No. 2005/0149159, entitled “Devices and Methods for Controlling and Indicating the Length of an Interventional Element,” and application Ser. No. 11/614,271, filed Dec. 21, 2006, formerly 021629-003800US), entitled “Custom Length Stent Apparatus,” the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Both outer sheath 124 and guidewire 138 each may extend through an optional slider assembly 132 slidably disposed on the catheter body 120 at a point between its handle 106 and prostheses 128. Optionally, in other embodiments, sheath 124 may extend through slider 132 with the guidewire 138 running axially along the outside of slider 132. The slider assembly 132 is adapted for insertion into and sealing with a hemostasis valve, such as on an introducer sheath or guiding catheter, while still allowing relative movement of the outer sheath 124 relative to the slider assembly 132. The slider assembly 132 includes a slider tube 118, a slider body 116, and a slider cap 114.
Outer sheath 124 may be composed of any of a variety of biocompatible materials, such as but not limited to a polymer like PTFE, FEP, polyimide, Nylon, Pebax, or metals including Nitinol or stainless steel. Outer sheath 124 may also be reinforced with a metallic or polymeric braid to resist radial expansion of radially expandable control member 130 and self-expanding prostheses 128. Similar materials may also be used for the inner shaft 134 and the pusher tube 144. Additional aspects of the luminal prosthesis delivery system are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/306,813, filed Nov. 27, 2002; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/637,713, filed Aug. 8, 2003; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/738,666, filed Dec. 16, 2003; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/104,305, filed Apr. 11, 2005; the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Although not required, in preferred embodiments, outer sheath 124 may further comprise an optional flexible distal tip which interacts with the self-expanding prostheses 128 during deployment.
In the embodiments of
In preferred embodiments the adjacent ends have axially extending members that interleave with one another. In a preferred embodiment seen in
In this preferred embodiment, each wave pattern 418 repeats itself fourteen times in each of the eight parallel columns 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, 412, 414, 416 of open cells 426, although this number is not intended to be limiting. The number of rows of cells may be increased to provide increased scaffolding of the lumen wall or the number of rows may be decreased to minimize the amount of metal in the prosthesis which contacts the lumen wall. The wave pattern 418 in each column is out-of-phase with the adjacent column, therefore the peak of one sinusoidal-like wave pattern is adjacent to the trough of a sinusoidal-like wave 418 pattern in an adjacent column. In addition, the parallel columns 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, 412, 414, 416 of open cells 426 are joined together by a sigmoidal shaped connector 428 which joins the ends of U-shaped connector 422 together.
The sigmoidal connector 428 generally attaches to the apex of the U-shaped connector 422. Also, the sigmoidal shaped connector 428 attaches generally to every third U-shaped connector 422, in each column 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, 412, 414, 416, thus there are five sigmoidal shaped connectors 428 between each column 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, 412, 414 and 416 of open cells 426. Additionally, the slope of the sigmoidal shaped connectors 428 alternate between columns 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, 412, 414 and 416 of open cells 426. For example, the sigmoidal shaped connector 428 between column 402 and 404 is attached to the U-shaped connector 422 in column 402 at a point generally at the center of the valley of the U-shaped connector 422 and substantially parallel to the axial struts 420. The sigmoidal connector 428 slopes downward toward the adjacent U-shaped connector 422 in the adjacent column 404 and attaches to the adjacent U-shaped connector 422 at a point generally at the center of the peak of the U-shaped connector 422 and substantially parallel to the axial struts 420. The sigmoidal shaped connector 422 between columns 404 and 406 similarly joins U-shaped connectors 422, except this time slopes upward. This pattern alternates across the prosthesis 400 so that there are four sets of sigmoidal shaped connectors 428 sloping downward and three sets of sigmoidal shaped connectors 428 that slope upward. Therefore because the columns 402, 404, 406, 408, 410, 412, 414, 416 of wave patterns 418 are out-of-phase, the U-shaped connectors 422 join cells 426 in a staggered fashion.
Both ends of prosthesis 400 also comprise locking tabs 432 having a narrow neck portion 433 and a wider head portion 435 defined by curved struts 438. Each locking tab 432 is joined to the body of the prosthesis 400 by curved struts 438 which join alternating U-shaped connectors 422 at their apex 440 and form a first subcell 436 and a second subcell 434 which serves as an enlarged flange region of the locking tab 432. Curved struts 438 join two U-shaped connectors 422A, 422C, which are separated by one intervening U-shaped connector 422B. In some embodiments, the second subcell 434 may be fitted with an optional radiopaque marker to enhance visibility of the prosthesis under a fluoroscope. A space 442 is disposed between locking tabs 432, defined by a narrow inlet portion 443 and a wider receiver portion 445 adapted to receive the locking tab 432 from an adjacent prosthesis 400. Locking tabs 432 on the opposite end of prosthesis 400 are circumferentially offset with respect to the first end so that adjacent prostheses may interleave and engage with one another.
In this preferred embodiment, each wave pattern 618 repeats itself eighteen times in each of the ten parallel columns 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d, 602e, 602f, 602g, 602h, 602i, 602j of open cells 626, although this number is not meant to be limiting. The number of rows of cells may be increased to provide increased scaffolding of the lumen wall or the number of rows may be decreased to minimize the amount of metal in the prostheses which contacts the lumen wall. The wave pattern 618 in each column is out-of-phase with the adjacent column, therefore the peak of one sinusoidal-like wave patterns is adjacent to the trough of a sinusoidal-like wave 618 pattern in an adjacent column. In addition, the parallel columns 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d, 602e, 602f, 602g, 602h, 602i, 602j of open cells 626 are joined together by a sigmoidal shaped connector 628 which joins the ends of U-shaped connector 622.
The sigmoidal shaped connector 628 attaches generally to every third U-shaped connector 622, in each column 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d, 602e, 602f, 602g, 602h, 602i, 602j thus there are six sigmoidal shaped connectors 628 between each column 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d, 602e, 602f, 602g, 602h, 602i, 602j of open cells 626. Additionally, the slope of the sigmoidal shaped connectors 628 alternate between columns 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d, 602e, 602f, 602g, 602h, 602i, 602j of open cells 626. For example, the sigmoidal shaped connector 628 between column 602a and 602b is connected to U-shaped connector 622 substantially parallel to axial struts 620 and at a point in column 602a that is lower than the U-shaped connector 622 in adjacent column 602b. The sigmoidal connector is connected to adjacent U-shaped connector 622 in column 602b substantially parallel to axial struts 620, but at a point higher than in column 602a. Therefore, sigmoidal connector generally slopes upward. The sigmoidal connector 622 slopes downward between the next set of columns 602b and 602c, and this pattern alternates across prosthesis 600 so that there are a total of five sets of sigmoidal connectors 622 that slope upward and four sets that slope downward. Additionally, the sigmoidal connectors 622 are staggered between columns 602a, 602b, 602c, 602d, 602e, 602f, 602g, 602h, 602i, 602j. Sigmoidal connectors 622 that slope upward are all along the same row, while sigmoidal connectors 622 that slope downward are in a different row and thus offset from those that slope upward, thereby creating a staggered pattern.
Both ends of prosthesis 600 also have locking tabs 632 having a narrow neck portion 633 and a wider head portion 635 defined by curved struts 638. Locking tabs 632 are staggered so that adjacent prostheses 600 may interlock with one another. Each locking tab 632 is joined to the body of prosthesis 600 by a pair of zig-zag shaped connectors 639 which are coupled to every other U-shaped connector 622 at a point 640 which is slightly offset from the apex of the U-shaped connector 622. Connector 639 also permits the locking tabs 632 to radially deflect relative to the prosthesis 600. This point alternates from slightly above the apex to slightly below the apex between connection points. The curved struts 638 also form a first subcell 636 and a second subcell 634 which serves as an enlarged flange region of the locking tab 632. The second subcell 634 preferably contains a tantalum radiopaque marker 625 press fit into the subcell 634 to facilitate visualization of the prostheses 600 under fluoroscopy. Radiopaque markers 625 may be press fit into any or all of the second subcells 634. Each curved strut 638 is attached to a zig-zag connector 639 which allows the prosthesis to flex in the radial direction relative to locking tab 632. The zig-zag connector is attached to a U-shaped connector 622. The two connections to U-shaped connectors 622 are separated by an intervening U-shaped connector. A space 642 is disposed between locking tabs 632, defined by a narrow inlet portion 643 and a wider receiver portion 645 adapted to receive the locking tab 632 from an adjacent prosthesis 600. Locking tabs 632 on the opposite end of prosthesis 600 are circumferentially offset with respect to the first end so that adjacent prostheses 600 may interleave and engage with one another.
Other interleaving stent embodiments are described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/738,666 filed Dec. 16, 2003; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/957,079 filed Sep. 30, 2004; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/784,309 filed Mar. 20, 2006, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Prostheses 128 are preferably composed of an elastic or superelastic shape memory alloy such as Nitinol so that the prostheses 128 resiliently self-expand upon release into a vessel by retraction of the sheath 124. Other possible materials include a spring temper metal such as stainless steel or cobalt-chromium so the prostheses 128 may be self-expanding in the body lumen at the target treatment site. In the case of self-expanding prostheses 128, an inflation balloon is not required but may still be used for predilation of a lesion or augmenting expansion of the self-expanding stent segments 128 (e.g. postdilation or tacking). Other materials such as biocompatible polymers may be used to fabricate prosthetic stent segments that self-expand, and these materials may further include bioabsorbable or bioerodable properties.
In other embodiments, prostheses 128 may have any of a variety of common constructions, such as but not limited to those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/738,666 filed Dec. 16, 2003, which was previously incorporated by reference. Constructions may include for example, closed cell constructions including expansible ovals, ellipses, box structures, expandable diamond structures, etc. In addition, the closed cells may have complex slotted geometries such as H-shaped slots, I-shaped slots, J-shaped slots, etc. Suitable open cell structures include zig-zag structures, serpentine structures, and the like. Such conventional stent structures are well described in the patent and medical literature. Specific examples of suitable stent structures are described in the following U.S. patents, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,315,794; 5,980,552; 5,836,964; 5,527,354; 5,421,955; 4,886,062; and 4,776,337.
In preferred embodiments, prosthetic stent segments 128 may be coated, impregnated, infused or otherwise coupled with one or more drugs that inhibit restenosis, such as Rapamycin, Everolimus, Biolimus A9, Paclitaxel, analogs, prodrugs, or derivatives of the aforementioned, or other suitable agents, preferably carried in a durable or bioerodable carrier of polymeric or other suitable material. Alternatively, stent segments 128 may be coated with other types of drugs or therapeutic materials such as antibiotics, thrombolytics, anti-thrombotics, anti-inflammatories, cytotoxic agents, anti-proliferative agents, vasodilators, gene therapy agents, radioactive agents, immunosuppressants, chemotherapeutics, endothelial cell attractors or promoters and/or stem cells. Such materials may be coated over all or a portion of the surface of stent segments 128, or stent segments 128 may have a porous structure or include apertures, holes, channels, or other features in which such materials may be deposited.
Referring now to
Outer sheath 224 has a high hoop strength near the distal end (but proximal to the expandable tip if any) such that the outer sheath 224 is able to prevent the self-expanding prostheses 228 from expanding when the outer sheath 224 is disposed thereover. The outer sheath 224 also prevents the radially expandable control member 230 from expanding. This may be accomplished by using an outer sheath 224 with a suitable wall thickness or the sheath 224 may also have a distal portion formed from a metal or polymer reinforced with a metallic or polymeric braid to resist radial expansion of the self-expanding prostheses 228 and control member 230. In preferred embodiments, the entire length of sheath 224 may be reinforced.
In this embodiment, each prosthesis 228 has a length approximately 20 mm long. Thus the delivery catheter 200 is adapted to deliver a prosthesis having a total length from about 20 mm long, up to 160 mm long, in 20 mm increments. Other lengths and quantities of prostheses 228 may be employed and this exemplary embodiment is not meant to limit the scope of the present invention.
Radiopaque marker band 252 on sheath 224 is disposed near the distal end of outer sheath 224 and helps an operator to visualize the delivery catheter tip under fluoroscopy as well as assisting the operator in determining lesion length. In preferred embodiments, although not required, the outer sheath also comprises an expandable distal tip 254 which is adapted to expand with the prostheses 228 as they self-expand. A preferred embodiment of the flexible tip 254 is illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring back to
Referring now to
In
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Outer sheath 324 has a high hoop strength near the distal end such that the outer sheath 324 is able to prevent the self-expanding prostheses 328 from expanding when the outer sheath 324 is disposed thereover. This may be accomplished by using an outer sheath 324 with a thicker wall or the sheath 324 may also have a distal portion formed from a metal or polymer reinforced with a metallic or polymeric braid to resist radial expansion of the self-expanding prostheses 328. The entire length of sheath 324 may also be reinforced.
In this embodiment, each prosthesis 328 has a length approximately 20 mm long. Thus the delivery catheter 300 is adapted to deliver a prosthesis having a total length from about 20 mm long, up to 160 mm long, in 20 mm increments. Other lengths and quantities of prostheses 328 may be employed and this exemplary embodiment is not meant to limit the scope of the present invention.
Radiopaque marker band 352 disposed near the distal end of outer sheath 324 helps to visualize the delivery catheter tip under fluoroscopy as well as assisting the operator in determining lesion length. In preferred embodiments, although not required, the outer sheath also comprises a soft flexible distal tip 354 which is adapted to expand with the prostheses 328 as they self-expand. A preferred embodiment of the flexible tip 354 is illustrated in
In
Referring now to
In
Referring now to
Referring now to
After the last prosthesis 328 has been deployed into the lesion, as indicated when radiopaque marker 352 is near the proximal end of the lesion L, as seen under a fluoroscope, the balloon 330 may be deflated and the exposed balloon length adjusted by advancing or retracting sheath 324. Once the exposed balloon length has been adjusted, the balloon may be reinflated and an optional post dilation or “tacking” of the stent may be performed. The radially expandable control member 330 is then retracted from the deployed prostheses 360 by deflating the balloon 330. The delivery catheter 300 is then withdrawn proximally away from the lesion. Inner shaft 334 may then be retracted into sheath 324, repositioning prostheses 328 distally, up to nosecone 336. Delivery catheter 300 may then be withdrawn from the vessel being treated or repositioned to a new treatment site for deployment of additional prostheses 328.
While the exemplary embodiments have been described in some detail for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a variety of additional modifications, adaptations and changes may be clear to those of skill in the art. Hence, the scope of the present invention is limited solely by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/957,079, filed Sep. 30, 2004, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/879,949, filed Jun. 28, 2004, now abandoned, the full disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4069825 | Akiyama | Jan 1978 | A |
4468224 | Enzmann et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4512338 | Balko | Apr 1985 | A |
4564014 | Fogarty et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4580568 | Gianturco | Apr 1986 | A |
4681110 | Wiktor | Jul 1987 | A |
4690684 | McGreevy et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4733665 | Palmaz | Mar 1988 | A |
4739762 | Palmaz | Apr 1988 | A |
4748982 | Horzewski et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4762129 | Bonzel | Aug 1988 | A |
4770176 | McGreevy et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4775337 | Van Wagener et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz | Oct 1988 | A |
4886062 | Wiktor | Dec 1989 | A |
4891225 | Langer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4950227 | Savin et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4988356 | Crittenden et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994066 | Voss | Feb 1991 | A |
4994069 | Ritchart et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994298 | Yasuda | Feb 1991 | A |
5013318 | Spranza, III | May 1991 | A |
5035706 | Giantureo et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5040548 | Yock | Aug 1991 | A |
5061273 | Yock | Oct 1991 | A |
5064435 | Porter | Nov 1991 | A |
5092877 | Pinchuk | Mar 1992 | A |
5102417 | Palmaz | Apr 1992 | A |
5104404 | Wolff | Apr 1992 | A |
5122154 | Rhodes | Jun 1992 | A |
5135535 | Kramer | Aug 1992 | A |
5158548 | Lau et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5192297 | Hull | Mar 1993 | A |
5195984 | Schatz | Mar 1993 | A |
5201757 | Heyn et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5217495 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5219355 | Parodi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5226913 | Pinchuk | Jul 1993 | A |
5246421 | Saab | Sep 1993 | A |
5273536 | Savas | Dec 1993 | A |
5282824 | Gianturco | Feb 1994 | A |
5300085 | Yock | Apr 1994 | A |
5312415 | Palermo | May 1994 | A |
5334187 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5391172 | Williams et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5421955 | Lau et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5443498 | Fontaine | Aug 1995 | A |
5445646 | Euteneuer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5456713 | Chuter | Oct 1995 | A |
5458615 | Klemm et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470315 | Adams | Nov 1995 | A |
5478349 | Nicholas | Dec 1995 | A |
5484444 | Braunschweiler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5490837 | Blaeser et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496346 | Horzewski et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501227 | Yock | Mar 1996 | A |
5507768 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507771 | Gianturco | Apr 1996 | A |
5514093 | Ellis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5514154 | Lau et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527354 | Fontaine et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531735 | Thompson | Jul 1996 | A |
5533968 | Muni et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534007 | St. Germain et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545209 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549551 | Peacock, III et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549563 | Kronner | Aug 1996 | A |
5549635 | Solar | Aug 1996 | A |
5554181 | Das | Sep 1996 | A |
5562725 | Schmitt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571086 | Kaplan et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591195 | Taheri et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593412 | Martinez et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5607444 | Lam | Mar 1997 | A |
5607463 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628755 | Heller et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628775 | Jackson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634928 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5639274 | Fischell et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5662675 | Polanskyj Stockert et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670161 | Healy et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676654 | Ellis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683451 | Lenker et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690644 | Yurek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693085 | Buirge et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697948 | Marin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697971 | Fischell et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702418 | Ravenscroft | Dec 1997 | A |
5709701 | Parodi | Jan 1998 | A |
5716393 | Lindenberg et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722669 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5723003 | Winston et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735869 | Fernandez-Aceytuno | Apr 1998 | A |
5741323 | Pathak et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749848 | Jang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749890 | Shaknovich | May 1998 | A |
5749921 | Lenker et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755772 | Evans et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755776 | Al-Saadon | May 1998 | A |
5755781 | Jayaraman | May 1998 | A |
5769882 | Fogarty et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772669 | Vrba | Jun 1998 | A |
5776141 | Klein et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792144 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797951 | Mueller | Aug 1998 | A |
5800519 | Sandock | Sep 1998 | A |
5807398 | Shaknovich | Sep 1998 | A |
5824040 | Cox et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824041 | Lenker et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833694 | Poncet | Nov 1998 | A |
5836964 | Richter et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843092 | Heller et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855563 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858556 | Eckert et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870381 | Kawasaki et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879370 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891190 | Boneau | Apr 1999 | A |
5895398 | Wensel et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899935 | Ding | May 1999 | A |
5902332 | Schatz | May 1999 | A |
5919175 | Sirhan | Jul 1999 | A |
5921971 | Agro et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922020 | Klein et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5941869 | Patterson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951585 | Cathcart et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961536 | Mickley et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968069 | Dusbabek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972027 | Johnson | Oct 1999 | A |
5976107 | Mertens et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976155 | Foreman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980484 | Ressemann et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980486 | Enger | Nov 1999 | A |
5980514 | Kupiecki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980552 | Pinchasik et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984957 | Laptewicz, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989280 | Euteneuer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993484 | Shmulewitz | Nov 1999 | A |
5997563 | Kretzers | Dec 1999 | A |
6004328 | Solar | Dec 1999 | A |
6007517 | Anderson | Dec 1999 | A |
6010530 | Goicoechea | Jan 2000 | A |
6022359 | Frantzen | Feb 2000 | A |
6022374 | Imran | Feb 2000 | A |
6027519 | Stanford | Feb 2000 | A |
6033434 | Borghi | Mar 2000 | A |
6036725 | Avellanet | Mar 2000 | A |
6039721 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042589 | Marianne | Mar 2000 | A |
6056722 | Jayaraman | May 2000 | A |
6063111 | Hieshima et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066155 | Amann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068655 | Seguin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070589 | Keith et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090063 | Makower et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090136 | McDonald et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102942 | Ahari | Aug 2000 | A |
6106530 | Harada | Aug 2000 | A |
RE36857 | Euteneuer et al. | Sep 2000 | E |
6120522 | Vrba et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123712 | Di Caprio et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123723 | Konya et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126685 | Lenker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6129756 | Kugler | Oct 2000 | A |
6132460 | Thompson | Oct 2000 | A |
6139572 | Campbell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143016 | Bleam et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165167 | Delaloye | Dec 2000 | A |
6165210 | Lau et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171334 | Cox | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179878 | Duerig | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183509 | Dibie | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187034 | Frantzen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190402 | Horton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196995 | Fagan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200337 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217585 | Houser et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238991 | Suzuki | May 2001 | B1 |
6241691 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241758 | Cox | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248122 | Klumb et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251132 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251134 | Alt et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254612 | Hieshima | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6254628 | Wallace et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258117 | Camrud et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264688 | Herklotz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267783 | Letendre et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270524 | Kim | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273895 | Pinchuk et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273911 | Cox et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273913 | Wright et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287291 | Bigus et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6312458 | Golds | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315794 | Richter | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319277 | Rudnick et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322586 | Monroe et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325823 | Horzewski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334871 | Dor et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340366 | Wijay | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6344272 | Oldenburg et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348065 | Brown et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350252 | Ray et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6350277 | Kocur | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357104 | Myers | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361558 | Hieshima et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6375676 | Cox | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379365 | Diaz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383171 | Gifford et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394995 | Solar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6409753 | Brown et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415696 | Erickson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416543 | Hilaire et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419693 | Fariabi | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425898 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428811 | West et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451025 | Jervis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451050 | Rudakov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464720 | Boatman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6468298 | Pelton | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468299 | Stack et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6485510 | Camrud et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488694 | Lau et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6488702 | Besselink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511468 | Cragg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6520986 | Martin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520987 | Plante | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527789 | Lau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6527799 | Shanley | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530944 | West et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540777 | Stenzel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551350 | Thornton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555157 | Hossainy | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558415 | Thompson | May 2003 | B2 |
6562067 | Mathis | May 2003 | B2 |
6569180 | Sirhan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575993 | Yock | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579305 | Lashinski | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579309 | Loos et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582394 | Reiss et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582460 | Cryer | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585756 | Strecker | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589273 | McDermott | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592549 | Gerdts et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599296 | Gillick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599314 | Mathis | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602226 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6602282 | Yan | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605062 | Hurley et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6605109 | Fiedler | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6607553 | Healy et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6613074 | Mitelberg et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629992 | Bigus et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6645517 | West | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645547 | Shekalim et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656212 | Ravenscroft et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660031 | Tran et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6660381 | Halas et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663660 | Dusbabek et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666883 | Seguin et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676693 | Belding et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676695 | Solem | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6679909 | McIntosh et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685730 | West et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692465 | Kramer | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699280 | Camrud et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699281 | Vallana et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6699724 | West et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6702843 | Brown | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709379 | Brandau et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709440 | Callol et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712827 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712845 | Hossainy | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723071 | Gerdts et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736842 | Healy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743219 | Dwyer et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6743251 | Eder | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761734 | Suhr | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6776771 | van Moorlegem et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6778316 | Halas et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790227 | Burgermeister | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800065 | Betelia et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6825203 | Pasternak et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6837901 | Rabkin et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849084 | Rabkin et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6852252 | Halas et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855125 | Shanley | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858034 | Hijlkema et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6878161 | Lenker | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884257 | Cox | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6893417 | Gribbons et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6896695 | Mueller et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6913619 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6918928 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6939376 | Shulze et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945989 | Betelia et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6945995 | Nicholas | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951053 | Padilla et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962603 | Brown et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6964676 | Gerberding et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6991646 | Clerc et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6994721 | Israel | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005454 | Brocchini et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7022132 | Kocur | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029493 | Majercak et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037327 | Salmon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7090694 | Morris et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7101840 | Brocchini et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7131993 | Gregorich | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7137993 | Acosta et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7141063 | White et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7147655 | Chermoni | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7147656 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7169172 | Levine et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169174 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172620 | Gilson | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7175654 | Bonsignore et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7182779 | Acosta et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192440 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208001 | Coyle et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208002 | Shelso | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220275 | Davidson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220755 | Betts et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223283 | Chouinard | May 2007 | B2 |
7238197 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7241308 | Andreas et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244336 | Fischer et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7270668 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7294146 | Chew et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7300456 | Andreas et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7309350 | Landreville et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314480 | Eidenschink et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320702 | Hammersmark et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323006 | Andreas et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7326236 | Andreas et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7351255 | Andreas | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7534449 | Saltzman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7699886 | Sugimoto | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7918881 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7993388 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20010020154 | Bigus et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010020173 | Klumb et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010020181 | Layne | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010035902 | Iddan et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044595 | Reydel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044632 | Daniel et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049547 | Moore | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007212 | Brown et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020037358 | Barry et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052642 | Cox et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087186 | Shelso | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091439 | Baker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092536 | LaFontaine et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107560 | Richter | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111671 | Stenzel | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123786 | Gittings et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128706 | Osypka | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138132 | Brown | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151924 | Shiber | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151955 | Tran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156496 | Chermoni | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165599 | Nasralla | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020168317 | Daighighian et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177890 | Lenker | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183763 | Callol et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188343 | Mathis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188347 | Mathis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193873 | Brucker et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030045923 | Bashiri et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030093143 | Zhao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097169 | Brucker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030114912 | Sequin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114919 | McQuiston et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114922 | Iwasaka et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125791 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125800 | Shulze et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030125802 | Callol et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135259 | Simso | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135266 | Chew et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139796 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139797 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139798 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163085 | Tanner et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176909 | Kusleika | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191516 | Weldon et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195609 | Berenstein | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199821 | Gerdts et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204238 | Tedeschi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208223 | Kleiner | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212447 | Euteneuer | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225446 | Hartley | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015224 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024450 | Shulze et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030380 | Shulze et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044395 | Nelson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073290 | Chouinard | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088044 | Brown et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093061 | Acosta et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093067 | Israel | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106979 | Goicoechea | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111145 | Serino et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117008 | Wnendt et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143322 | Litvack et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176832 | Hartley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181239 | Dorn et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186551 | Kao et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193245 | Deem et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040215165 | Coyle et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215312 | Andreas et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215331 | Chew et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230285 | Gifford, III et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243217 | Andersen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249434 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249439 | Richter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004657 | Burgermeister | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010276 | Acosta et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038494 | Eidenschink | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038505 | Shulze et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049673 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080474 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080475 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085897 | Bonsignore | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090846 | Pedersen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123451 | Nomura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125051 | Eidenschink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131008 | Betts et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137622 | Griffin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143827 | Globerman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149168 | Gregorich | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165378 | Heinrich et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171568 | Duffy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182477 | White | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209674 | Kutscher et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209680 | Gale et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222671 | Schaeffer et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228477 | Grainger et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245637 | Hossainy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249777 | Michal et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278011 | Peckham | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288764 | Snow et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288766 | Plain et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060069424 | Acosta et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060173529 | Blank | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200223 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206190 | Chermoni | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229700 | Acosta et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229706 | Shulze et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271150 | Andreas et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271151 | McGarry et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282147 | Andreas et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282149 | Kao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282150 | Olson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287726 | Segal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010869 | Sano | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027521 | Andreas et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043419 | Nikolchev et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067012 | George et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070088368 | Acosta et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088420 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088422 | Chew et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100423 | Acosta et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100424 | Chew et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106365 | Andreas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118202 | Chermoni | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118203 | Chermoni | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118204 | Chermoni | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129733 | Will et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135906 | Badylak et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156225 | George et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156226 | Chew et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179587 | Acosta et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219612 | Andreas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219613 | Kao et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070265637 | Andreas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270936 | Andreas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276461 | Andreas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281117 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292518 | Ludwig | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080004690 | Robaina | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046067 | Toyokawa | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071345 | Hammersmark et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077229 | Andreas et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091257 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097299 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097574 | Andreas et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080125850 | Andreas et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147162 | Andreas et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177369 | Will et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080199510 | Ruane et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208311 | Kao et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208318 | Kao et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234795 | Snow et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234798 | Chew et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234799 | Acosta et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243225 | Satasiya et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249607 | Webster et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269865 | Snow et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090076584 | Mao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105686 | Snow et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090149863 | Andreas et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090234428 | Snow et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248137 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248140 | Gerberding | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264979 | Kao et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100004729 | Chew et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 953 1659 | Mar 1997 | DE |
1 963 0469 | Jan 1998 | DE |
199 50 756 | Aug 2000 | DE |
101 03 000 | Aug 2002 | DE |
0 203 945 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0 274 129 | Jul 1988 | EP |
0 282 143 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 505 686 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 533 960 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 596 145 | May 1994 | EP |
0 696 447 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0 714 640 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 797 963 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0 947 180 | Oct 1999 | EP |
1 258 230 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1 266 638 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1 277 449 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1 290 987 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 318 765 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 523 959 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1 523 960 | Apr 2005 | EP |
2277875 | Nov 1994 | GB |
03-133446 | Jun 1991 | JP |
10-503663 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-295823 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2001-190687 | Jul 2001 | JP |
2004-121343 | Apr 2004 | JP |
9427667 | Dec 1994 | WO |
WO 9526695 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9633677 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9637167 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9639077 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9746174 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9748351 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9837833 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9901087 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 0012832 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0015151 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0025841 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0032136 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0041649 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0050116 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0051525 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0056237 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0062708 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0072780 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0170297 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0191918 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 02085253 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 02098326 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03022178 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03047651 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03051425 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03075797 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 2004017865 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043299 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043301 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004043510 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004052237 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005009295 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013853 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2007053187 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146411 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008005111 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080132989 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10957079 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11752448 | US | |
Parent | 10879949 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 10957079 | US |