The problems of static electricity and Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) are well known in the electronics industry. In general, electronic components are damaged following the occurrence of electrical events that cause the transfer of charge from one material to another creating a voltage surge related to voltage potential differences between the two materials. The Electrostatic Discharge Association (ESDA) cites industry experts as estimating that product losses due to ESD range from 8-33%. According to the ESDA, others have estimated the actual cost of ESD damage to the electronics industry as running into the billions of dollars annually. See http://www.esda.org/basics/part1.cfm.
In general, basic methods of protecting components from ESD damage include some basic precautions such as proper grounding or shunting that will “dissipate” or discharge transient signals away from the device to be protected. Still other methods include the use of packages and handling techniques that will protect susceptible devices during transport and shipping. While such techniques have been effectively used to shield the product from charge and to reduce the generation of charge caused by any movement of product within the container housing the device to be protected, they have not completely eliminated the risk of damage. Moreover, it is well known that more modern devices operating in the higher frequencies (GHz and above) using submicron line widths are more susceptible to damage which can not be overcome using such methods.
Components designed to react to ESD events and provide a discharge path to ground are known in the arts. Examples of such components include diodes and capacitors. In addition, other components are based on the teachings of references such as U.S. Pat. No. 6,172,590 entitled “Over-voltage protection device and method for making same” to Shrier et. al which describes a discrete electrical protection device that utilizes a gap between two electrically conductive members attached to an electrically insulating substrate. According to the '590 patent, the electrical protection device can be either surface mounted or built with through-holes for accommodating leads on an electrical connector. The '590 describes and claims methods for making an electrical protection device that includes an electrically insulating substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,310,752 entitled “Variable voltage protection structures and method for making same” to Shrier et. al. describes and claims a variable voltage protection component that includes a reinforcing layer of insulating material having a substantially constant thickness embedded in a voltage variable material. According to the '752 patent, the reinforcing layer defines a uniform thickness for the variable voltage protection component resistive to compressive forces that may cause a reduction in the clamp voltage or a short in the voltage variable material. The '752 patent also describes methods for making such a variable voltage protection component.
Prior art ESD suppression devices, such as those incorporating the teachings of the '590 patent and the '752 patent, have been successfully made and used. Generally, such devices utilize a couple of electrodes with some type of surge material interspersed between the electrodes. One electrode provides the transient signal input terminal while the other provides the discharge path to ground. A barrier layer known as the substrate or reinforcement layer is used to provide the necessary stiffness permitting the component to be surface mounted or through-holed.
Such prior art protection components, however, suffer from several limitations attributed to the requirement that a substrate or reinforcing layer be used. Specifically, the use of a substrate adds significantly to the component's overall size and cost. In addition, the relatively large size and profile of such prior art protection components makes their use impractical in tight spaces where board space is limited. Moreover, since the substrate material is a primary expense in the manufacture of such components, the use of prior art protection components on a widespread basis can be cost prohibitive. In addition, the use of prior art ESD protection devices in printed circuit board applications may require an individual device be surface mounted to each component or signal path to be protected which may be cost prohibitive.
As electronic devices became faster and smaller, their sensitivity to ESD increases. ESD impacts productivity and product reliability in virtually every aspect of today's electronics environment. Many aspects of electrostatic control in the electronics industry also apply in other industries such as clean room applications and signal line proliferation.
Specific embodiments of the invention will be understood from consideration of the following detailed description as well as the appended drawings in which:
a and 1b are perspective and cross-sectional views of a device for suppressing electrostatic discharge according to a first embodiment;
a and 2b are perspective and cross-sectional views, respectively, of a device for suppressing electrostatic discharge according to a second embodiment;
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Referring to
Both first and second multilayer structures 14 and 16 of device 10 include a top and bottom conductive layers (described below) and a barrier layer 18 and 30, respectively, which allow device 10 to have an extremely low profile when compared with prior art ESD protection devices. Thus, the use of low profile multilayer structures, such as first and second multilayer structures 14, 16, reduce the overall size and bulk of device 10 making it especially suitable for surface mount and embedded board applications. Barrier layers 18, 30 provide an electrical insulating material that is sandwiched between two conductive layers. It has been found that a polyimide film such as Kapton® (from Dupont provides suitable insulating characteristics while maintaining the desired low profile since it forms an impenetrable barrier with the thickness of a film (Kapton® is a registered trademark of the Dupont company). Thus, the use of a polyimide film within a multilayer structure, such as multilayer structures 14 and 16, solves many of the problems associated with prior art ESD protection devices that require a substrate or reinforcing layer and which add significantly to the overall size and profile of the suppression device.
First multilayer structure 14 also includes a conductive terminal layer 20 which provides an ESD signal interface to the device 20. Under normal conditions, i.e. without the occurrence of an ESD event, electrical signals bypass the electrostatic discharge reactance layer 12 via terminals 22 and 24 of terminal layer 20, one of which is in electrical continuity with a device or signal pathway to be protected (not shown in
As shown, terminals 22 and 24 are separated by gap 27 and coupled to one side (or surface) of the barrier layer 18. The Related Application discloses methods for forming terminals, such as terminals 22 and 24, on a layer, such as barrier layer 18, using well known PCB manufacturing methods. Opposite terminal layer 20 is a conductive electrode layer 28 consisting of electrodes 28a and 28b which, as shown in
Second multilayer structure 16 is similar to first multilayer structure 14 as shown in
With reference to
a, 1b, 3 and 4, show that device 10 can be equipped with plated through-holes 60, 62 which supported surface mount applications and provide signal continuity from the various layers of the device. Conductors 64 and 66 (
In the event an ESD signal threatens component 140, electrostatic discharge reactance layer 112 reacts by creating a signal path between multilayer structure 114 and structure/layer 116 which, as shown, is connected to ground plane 160 via trace 162. Being a polymer-based ESD suppression material, the principles of operation of electrostatic discharge reactance layer 112 are such that electrostatic discharge reactance layer 112 presents resistance to signal flow through electrostatic discharge reactance layer 112 with signal continuity maintained between component 140 and trace 150, thus bypassing device 110 during normal operation. Isolation 117 provides a way of isolating device 110 from signal pathways during normal operation. Of course, any other suitable means of isolating device 110 from structures within the board 122 may be utilized.
Device 110 may be embedded within the layers of a typical printed circuit board providing ESD protection for a variety of components, such as component 140. A gap 170 allows the configuration of structure 114 as dictated by a particular design. Thus, structure segment 114a can be used to couple signal pathways from other areas or other pins of a component, such as a component 140, to device 110. In this way, multiple components, signal pathways or pins of a single component may be protected.
While the invention has been described with reference to illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications in combinations of the illustrative embodiments, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.
This application is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/672,839, filed Feb. 8, 2007, which is a continuation of 10/944,124, filed on Sep. 17, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,218,492, naming inventor Karen P. Shrier, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4726991 | Hyatt et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4977357 | Shrier | Dec 1990 | A |
5034709 | Azumi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5068634 | Shrier | Nov 1991 | A |
5075665 | Taira et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5099380 | Childers et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5248517 | Shrier et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5777541 | Vekeman | Jul 1998 | A |
5796570 | Mekdhanasarn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807509 | Shrier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5955762 | Hivley | Sep 1999 | A |
5962815 | Lan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6074576 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108184 | Minervini et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6172590 | Shrier et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6239687 | Shrier et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6274852 | Blok et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6310752 | Shrier | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6534422 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542065 | Shrier | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570765 | Behling et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6657532 | Shrier | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6963493 | Galvagni | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981319 | Shrier | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7218492 | Shrier | May 2007 | B2 |
7558042 | Shrier | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20030071245 | Harris, IV | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3231118 | Mar 1993 | DE |
0530052 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0981137 | Feb 2000 | EP |
405021211 | Jan 1993 | JP |
20040160300 | Aug 2007 | TW |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090237855 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11672839 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 12477790 | US | |
Parent | 10944124 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11672839 | US |