Devices for controlling the unloading of superelastic and shape memory orthopedic implants

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10130358
  • Patent Number
    10,130,358
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 7, 2016
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
This disclosure provides novel devices for controlling the unloading stress and recoverable strain of Nitinol devices and/or other shape memory material devices. The devices may be used to bring bone fragments into close proximity with each other, generate a compressive load between the bone fragments, and maintain that compressive load between the bone fragments while healing occurs.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to approaches for controlling the unloading stress of Nitinol devices, and/or other shape memory material devices, in order to facilitate healing of diseased or damaged tissue. The present disclosure finds particular utility in the field of orthopedics, and specifically as an approach for creating and using devices for reducing fractures and generating and maintaining compression between bone fragments. While the present disclosure has application throughout the body, its utility will sometimes hereinafter be illustrated in the context of providing and using screws, staples, plates, and/or intramedullary devices for the repair of fractured or displaced bone tissue.


BACKGROUND

In the field of orthopedic surgery, it is common to rejoin broken bones. The success of the surgical procedure often depends on the ability to reapproximate the fractured bone, the amount of compression achieved between the bone fragments, and the ability to sustain that compression over a period of time. If the surgeon is unable to bring the bone fragments into close contact, a gap will exist between the bone fragments and the bone tissue will need to first fill that gap before complete healing can take place. Furthermore, gaps between bone fragments that are too large can allow motion to occur between the fragments, disrupting the healing tissue and thus slowing the healing process. Thus, non-unions, mal-unions, and delayed-unions of fractures can occur when the gap between bone fragments is too large. Optimal healing requires that the bone fragments be in close contact with each other, and for a compressive load to be applied and maintained between the bone fragments. Compressive strain between bone fragments has been found to accelerate the healing process in accordance with Wolf's Law.


Broken bones can be rejoined using screws, staples, plates, intramedullary devices, and other devices known in the art. These devices are designed to assist the surgeon with reducing the fracture and creating a compressive load between the bone fragments.


Screws are typically manufactured from either titanium or stainless steel alloys and may be lag screws or headless screws. Lag screws have a distal threaded region and an enlarged head. The head contacts the cortical bone surface and the action of the threaded region reduces the fracture and generates a compressive load. Headless screws typically have a threaded proximal region and a threaded distal region. A differential in the thread pitch of the two regions generates compression across the fracture site. There also exist fully-threaded headless compression screws that have a thread pitch which differs over the length of the single continuous thread.


Staples are formed from a plurality of legs (typically two legs, although sometimes more than two legs may be provided) connected together by a bridge. Staples are typically manufactured from stainless steel alloys, titanium alloys, or Nitinol, a shape memory alloy. The staples are inserted into pre-drilled holes on either side of the fracture site.


Plates are also used to rejoin broken bones. These plates are generally formed from a sheet or ribbon of material having a plurality of holes formed therein. The plates are typically manufactured from either stainless steel alloys or titanium alloys. The plates are placed adjacent to a fracture so that the plate spans the fracture line, and then screws are inserted through the holes in the plate and into the bone fragments on either side of the fracture site to stabilize the bone fragments relative to one another.


Intramedullary devices are often used for fractures of the long bones; however, they are also frequently used in the phalanges, and specifically for the treatment of “hammer toe”, which is a deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the second, third, or fourth toe causing the toe to be permanently bent, e.g., bent upwards. Typical intramedullary devices used in the phalanges have opposing ends that are adapted to grip the interior wall of the intramedullary canal. These intramedullary devices are typically made of titanium alloys, stainless steel alloys, Nitinol and/or other materials, e.g., PEEK. The titanium alloy devices and stainless steel alloy devices often have barbs or threaded regions at their opposing ends to grip the interior wall of the intramedullary canal. The Nitinol devices may have a pair of radially-extending “legs” at their opposing ends that expand outward when warmed to body temperature, with the pair of legs at each end of the device being disposed in a common plane.


While the foregoing devices (e.g., screws, staples, plates, and intramedullary devices) are designed to bring the bone fragments into close contact and to generate a compressive load between the bone fragments, the devices do not always succeed in accomplishing this objective. It is widely reported that the compressive load generated by these devices between the bone fragments dissipates rapidly as the bone relaxes and remodels around the device.


Nitinol can be used to improve the functional performance of these devices by utilizing either the shape memory effect of Nitinol or the superelastic properties of Nitinol to pull together the opposing bone fragments; however, the recovery forces and recoverable strain generated by the Nitinol versions of these devices may be too great and may damage bone tissue and thus not provide a means to generate and maintain compression between the bone fragments.


Thus there exists a clinical need for device that can be used to control the unloading stress and recoverable strain of Nitinol devices, and/or other shape memory material devices, so as to allow for devices that are able to bring bone fragments into close proximity with each other, generate a compressive load, and maintain that compressive load for a prolonged period of time while healing occurs without damaging the bone tissue.


SUMMARY

This disclosure provides novel devices for controlling the unloading stress and recoverable strain of Nitinol devices/implants and/or other shape memory material devices/implants. The devices may be used to bring bone fragments into close proximity with each other, generate a compressive load between the bone fragments, and maintain that compressive load between the bone fragments while healing occurs.


In an embodiment, a device is provided for controlling the recoverable strain and compression generated by a Nitinol staple. The device allows the surgeon to control to what extent the legs of the staple are opened to or beyond the parallel state. The more the staple is opened, the more recoverable strain and compression the staple will exert on the bone. This device is also beneficial because it allows the surgeon to control the rate of loading the compression onto the bone, and also provides a feedback for the surgeon to feel how much compression the bone is experiencing.


In another embodiment, a device is provided for controlling the recoverable strain and compression generated by a Nitinol compression screw. The Nitinol compression screw is elongated and held in the elongated state with an internal retaining pin. It may be provided to the surgeon with the screw stretched to the maximum (˜8%). The surgeon can partially withdraw the internal retaining pin to decrease the compressive force and recoverable strain the screw will exert on the bone following implantation. The more the internal retaining pin is removed, the less recoverable stress and strain the screw will exert. This is beneficial because it allows the surgeon to have better control of the device, and may be especially beneficial for the treatment of low density bone fractures.


In another embodiment, a device is provided for controlling the recoverable strain and compression generated by a Nitinol compression plate. The Nitinol compression plate is elongated and held in the elongated state with a delivery device. It may be provided to the surgeon with the plate fully elongated. The surgeon can use the delivery device to allow for partial stress/strain recovery of the device prior to implantation. This is beneficial because it allows the surgeon to have better control of the device, and may be especially beneficial for the treatment of low density bone fractures.


In yet another embodiment, a device is provided for controlling the recoverable strain and compression generated by a Nitinol intramedullary implant. The Nitinol intramedullary implant is provided in an elongated state with an internal retaining pin. The surgeon can partially withdraw the internal retaining pin to decrease the compressive force and recoverable strain the intramedullary implant will exert on the bone following implantation. The more the internal retaining pin is removed, the less recoverable stress and strain the intramedullary implant will exert. This is beneficial because it allows the surgeon to have better control of the device, and may be especially beneficial for the treatment of low density bone fractures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The various features and advantages of this disclosure will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.



FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 4 schematically illustrate a staple delivery device that can be used to control the recoverable strain and compressive force generated by the staple.



FIGS. 5 and 6 schematically illustrate a compression screw system that has an internal retaining pin that can be used to control the recoverable strain and compressive force generated by the screw.



FIGS. 7, 8, and 9 schematically illustrate a compression plate delivery device that has the ability to be adjusted by the surgeon to control the recoverable strain and compressive force generate by the compression plate.



FIGS. 10 and 11 schematically illustrate an intramedullary implant system that has an internal retaining pin that can be used to control the recoverable strain and compressive force generated by the intramedullary implant.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A method for controlling an unloading stress of an orthopedic implant according to an exemplary aspect of this disclosure includes, inter alia, positioning an implant made of a shape memory material in a deformed state to generate a stress level and recoverable strain within the implant, holding the implant in the deformed state with a retaining mechanism, and adjusting the retaining mechanism to control a level of deformation of the implant and alter the stress level and recoverable strain of the implant.


In a further embodiment, an implant is a compression screw.


In a further embodiment, a compression screw is made of Nitinol.


In a further embodiment, an implant is a compression staple.


In a further embodiment, a compression screw is made of Nitinol.


In a further embodiment, an implant is a compression plate.


In a further embodiment, a compression plate is made of Nitinol.


In a further embodiment, an implant is an intramedullary implant.


In a further embodiment, an intramedullary implant is made of Nitinol.


In a further embodiment, positioning an implant in a deformed state includes using superelastic or shape memory properties of the implant.


In a further embodiment, a retaining mechanism is a delivery device.


In a further embodiment, a delivery device includes a plunger.


In a further embodiment, a retaining mechanism is an internal retaining pin.


In a further embodiment, adjusting a retaining mechanism includes advancing a plunger to spread legs of an implant apart.


In a further embodiment, adjusting a retaining mechanism includes partially unscrewing an internal retaining pin from a central hollow region of an implant.


In a further embodiment, adjusting a retaining mechanism includes moving a restraining clip to change an amount that a central bridge of an implant bows outward.


In a further embodiment, at least a portion of an implant is reversibly stretched prior to holding the implant with a retaining mechanism.


In a further embodiment, an unloading stress of an implant is controlled with a retaining mechanism during implantation of the implant into bone.


A method according to another exemplary aspect of this disclosure includes, inter alia, positioning an implant made of a shape memory material in a deformed state to generate a stress level and recoverable strain within the implant, adjusting a level of deformation of the implant to alter the stress level and recoverable strain of the implant, and implanting the implant into bone, wherein the implant exerts a compressive load on the bone that is proportional to the stress level and recoverable strain generated in the implant while adjusting the level of deformation


Referring first to FIGS. 1-4, there is shown a novel device for controlling the recoverable strain and compressive force generated by a compression staple 10 made of a shape memory material such as Nitinol. The compression staple 10 is an exemplary type of orthopedic implant. A delivery device 5 (i.e., a retaining mechanism) holds the compression staple 10 on a pair of pin plates 15. A plunger 20 is connected to a knob 25. Turning the knob 25 causes the plunger 20 to advance and contact a bridge 19 of the compression staple 10, and this contact spreads the legs 21 of compression staple 10 apart. The more that the knob 25 is advanced, the more the compression staple 10 legs 21 open, and thus the more compressive force and recoverable strain the compression staple 10 is capable of. The delivery device 5 also provides the surgeon with feedback as to how much compression the staple is going to exert. The more the knob 25 is turned, the more torque that is required. The torque required to turn the knob 25 is related to and may be directly proportional to the compressive force and recoverable strain the compression staple 10 will exert upon implantation into bone.


Referring next to FIGS. 5 and 6, there is shown a compression screw system 30. The compression screw system 30 is another exemplary type of orthopedic implant. The compression screw system 30 includes compression screw 35 made of a shape memory material, such as Nitinol, and an internal retaining pin 40 (i.e., a retaining mechanism). During manufacturing, a central hollow region 45 of the compressions screw 35 is reversibly stretched. The internal retaining pin 40 is inserted into the compression screw 35 and keeps the compression screw 35 stretched. Prior to implantation, the surgeon can partially unthread the internal retaining pin 40. This will allow for partial recovery of the elongation of the compression screw 35. The more that the internal retaining pin 40 is unscrewed, the less compressive force and recoverable strain the compression screw 35 will exert when the internal retaining pin 40 is fully removed following implantation.



FIGS. 7, 8, and 9 illustrate a compression plate system 50. The compression plate system 50 is yet another exemplary type of orthopedic implant. The compression plate system 50 includes a delivery device 55 (i.e., a retaining mechanism) and a compression plate 60 made of a shape memory material, such as Nitinol. The delivery device 55 has a knob 65 connected to a plunger 70 and a restraining clip 75. Turning the knob 65 clockwise causes the restraining clip 75 to translate toward the knob 65. As the restraining clip 75 translates upward, it rides on a chamfer 80 (see FIG. 9). A cover 85 (see FIG. 8) of the delivery device 55 is hinged so as to allow the cover 85 to articulate open as the restraining clip 75 travels up the chamfer 80. As this happens, a central bridge of the compression plate 60 bows outward. This reduces the recoverable strain and compressive force that compression plate 60 will generate following implantation.


Referring now to FIGS. 10 and 11, there is shown an intramedullary implant system 90. The intramedullary implant system 90 is yet another exemplary type of orthopedic implant. The intramedullary implant system 90 includes an intramedullary implant 95 made of a shape memory material (e.g., Nitinol) and an internal retaining pin 100 (i.e., a retaining mechanism). During manufacturing, a central hollow region 105 of the intramedullary implant 95 is reversibly stretched. The internal retaining pin 100 is inserted into the intramedullary implant 95 and keeps the implant stretched. Prior to implantation, the surgeon can partially unthread the internal retaining pin 100. This will allow for partial recovery of the elongation of the intramedullary implant 95. The more that internal retaining pin 100 is unscrewed, the less compressive force and recoverable strain the intramedullary implant 95 will exert when the internal retaining pin 100 is fully removed following implantation.


The foregoing description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in any limiting sense. A worker of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications could come within the scope of this disclosure. For these reasons, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling an unloading stress of an orthopedic implant comprising: deforming a shape memory material implant to generate a stress level and recoverable strain within the implant;holding the implant in the deformed state with a retaining mechanism, wherein the retaining mechanism is configured to allow adjustment of stress and recoverable strain of the implant; andinserting the deformed implant into pre-drilled holes in bone.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting the retaining mechanism to alter the stress level and recoverable strain.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the shape memory material is nitinol.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the implant is a staple.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the implant is a compression screw.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the implant is a compression plate.
  • 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the implant is an intramedullary implant.
  • 8. The method of claim 3 further comprising adjusting the retaining mechanism to control the extent of staple legs opening to or beyond a parallel state.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the retaining mechanism comprises an internal retaining pin.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the implant is reversibly stretched prior to holding the implant with the retaining mechanism.
  • 11. A method for controlling an unloading stress of an orthopedic implant comprising: deforming a shape memory material implant to generate a stress level and recoverable strain within the implant;holding the implant in the deformed state with a retaining mechanism;adjusting the retaining mechanism to alter the stress level and recoverable strain; andinserting the deformed implant into pre-drilled holes in bone.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the shape memory material is nitinol.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the implant is selected from the group consisting of a staple, a compression screw, an intramedullary implant, and a compression plate.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/238,472, which was filed on Oct. 7, 2015, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (131)
Number Name Date Kind
6093188 Murray Jul 2000 A
6325805 Ogilvie et al. Dec 2001 B1
6607530 Carl et al. Aug 2003 B1
6626937 Cox Sep 2003 B1
6656181 Dixon et al. Dec 2003 B2
6773437 Ogilvie et al. Aug 2004 B2
7172593 Trieu et al. Feb 2007 B2
7309340 Fallin et al. Dec 2007 B2
7479143 Suh et al. Jan 2009 B2
7618441 Groiso Nov 2009 B2
7655009 Grusin Feb 2010 B2
7699879 Sherman et al. Apr 2010 B2
7763056 Dalton Jul 2010 B2
7771457 Kay et al. Aug 2010 B2
7875070 Molaei Jan 2011 B2
7976648 Boylan et al. Jul 2011 B1
7985222 Gall et al. Jul 2011 B2
7993380 Hawkes Aug 2011 B2
8048134 Partin Nov 2011 B2
8062378 Fonte Nov 2011 B2
8080044 Biedermann et al. Dec 2011 B2
8118952 Gall et al. Feb 2012 B2
8216398 Bledsoe et al. Jul 2012 B2
8257404 Hack Sep 2012 B2
8262659 Ryan et al. Sep 2012 B2
8394097 Peyrot et al. Mar 2013 B2
8419797 Biedermann et al. Apr 2013 B2
8425588 Molaei Apr 2013 B2
8439916 Coati et al. May 2013 B2
8460293 Coati et al. Jun 2013 B2
8475457 Shano Jul 2013 B2
8584853 Knight et al. Nov 2013 B2
8623061 Quevedo et al. Jan 2014 B2
8715325 Weiner et al. May 2014 B2
8721646 Fox May 2014 B2
8740954 Ghobrial et al. Jun 2014 B2
8784459 Kaufman et al. Jul 2014 B2
8808294 Fox et al. Aug 2014 B2
8834483 Cheney et al. Sep 2014 B2
8858603 Zufelt Oct 2014 B1
8864804 Champagne et al. Oct 2014 B2
8888826 Kinmon et al. Nov 2014 B2
8894669 Nering et al. Nov 2014 B2
8998999 Lewis et al. Apr 2015 B2
9017331 Fox Apr 2015 B2
9044281 Pool et al. Jun 2015 B2
9050153 Luxon et al. Jun 2015 B2
9056014 McCormick et al. Jun 2015 B2
9072562 Weiner et al. Jul 2015 B2
9078718 Campbell Jul 2015 B2
9095338 Taylor et al. Aug 2015 B2
9101349 Knight et al. Aug 2015 B2
9119681 Kaufmann et al. Sep 2015 B2
9168147 Patterson et al. Oct 2015 B2
9204932 Knight et al. Dec 2015 B2
9241738 Quevedo et al. Jan 2016 B2
9254350 Udipi et al. Feb 2016 B2
9265531 Ziolo Feb 2016 B2
9282977 Penzimer et al. Mar 2016 B2
9308035 Biedermann et al. Apr 2016 B2
9326794 Harms et al. May 2016 B2
9326804 Biedermann et al. May 2016 B2
9339268 Fox May 2016 B2
9339316 Hulliger May 2016 B2
9408647 Cheney Aug 2016 B2
9451955 Fox Sep 2016 B2
9451957 Fox Sep 2016 B2
9861413 Palmer Jan 2018 B2
20050085814 Sherman et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050136764 Sherman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165394 Boyce et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050187555 Biedermann et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050240190 Gall et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060235405 Hawkes Oct 2006 A1
20060264954 Sweeney Nov 2006 A1
20070198017 Tschakaloff et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080039847 Piper et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080097443 Campbell Apr 2008 A1
20080215097 Ensign Sep 2008 A1
20080243264 Fonte Oct 2008 A1
20080262629 Fonte Oct 2008 A1
20090125071 Skinlo et al. May 2009 A1
20090164016 Georgy et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090198287 Chiu Aug 2009 A1
20090216334 Leibel Aug 2009 A1
20100076498 Tyber et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100121329 Ryan et al. May 2010 A1
20100131014 Peyrot et al. May 2010 A1
20100211115 Tyber Aug 2010 A1
20100241120 Bledsoe et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110004255 Weiner et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110066190 Schaller et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110112579 Brazil et al. May 2011 A1
20110190776 Palmaz Aug 2011 A1
20120123554 Fonte May 2012 A1
20120172876 Coati et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120271363 Luxon et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130030437 Fox Jan 2013 A1
20130046346 Thorwarth et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130060337 Petersheim et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130123857 Biedermann et al. May 2013 A1
20130123925 Patterson et al. May 2013 A1
20130190817 Bouduban Jul 2013 A1
20130206815 Fox Aug 2013 A1
20130226241 Thompson et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130274814 Weiner et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130325074 Ziolo Dec 2013 A1
20140014553 Knight et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140018809 Allen Jan 2014 A1
20140020333 Knight et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140024002 Knight et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140114311 Pool et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140188237 McCormick et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140257291 Houff Sep 2014 A1
20140257420 Fox Sep 2014 A1
20140277516 Miller et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140330313 Kaufman et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140336651 Bouduban et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140336710 Georgy Nov 2014 A1
20140358187 Taber Dec 2014 A1
20140358247 Fox et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150011998 McCormick et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150080970 Campbell et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150238237 Madjarov Aug 2015 A1
20150238238 Cheney Aug 2015 A1
20150245859 McMillen et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150257804 Baynham Sep 2015 A1
20150305789 Weiner et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160051284 Cronen Feb 2016 A1
20160095638 Reimels Apr 2016 A1
20160135808 Anderson May 2016 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170100163 A1 Apr 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62238472 Oct 2015 US