1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to filter assemblies. More particularly, this invention discloses triple-mode, mono-block resonators that are smaller and less costly than comparable metallic combline resonators, including a microwave flat delay filter.
2. Background of the Invention
When generating signals in communication systems, combline filters are used to reject unwanted signals. Current combline filter structures consist of a series of metallic resonators dispersed in a metallic housing. Because of the required volume for each resonator, the metallic housing cannot be reduced in size beyond current technology, typically 3–10 cubic inches/resonator, depending on the operating frequency and the maximum insertion loss. Furthermore, the metallic housing represents a major cost percentage of the entire filter assembly. Consequently, current metallic filters are too large and too costly.
Further, personal communication systems demand highly linearized microwave power amplifiers for base station applications. Feedforward techniques are commonly used in the power amplifier design for reducing the level of the intermodulation distortion (IMD). One component common to feedforward power amplifier design is the delay in the primary high power feedforward loop for canceling the error signals of the power amplifier (PA). The electric delay is typically achieved by the coaxial type transmission line or metallic resonator filter. A filter-based delay line can be thought of as a specially designed wide bandpass filter with optimized group delay
However, the related art has various problems and disadvantages. For example, but not by way of limitation, because of the required volume for the delay line/filter for the new generation communication systems, the coaxial line and metallic housing filter cannot be further reduced in size limited by maximum insertion loss.
In a preferred embodiment, the invention is a method and apparatus of providing a very flat group delay over a wide frequency range.
In another preferred embodiment, the invention is a method and apparatus of tuning a filter assembly comprising a block resonator filter by removing small circular areas of a conductive surface from a face of said block resonator filter.
In still another preferred embodiment, the invention is a method and apparatus of tuning a filter assembly comprising a block resonator filter by grinding areas on a plurality of orthogonal faces of said block resonator filter to change the resonant frequencies of modes in said block.
In still another preferred embodiment, the invention is a method and apparatus of tuning a filter assembly comprising a block resonator filter by using at least one tuning cylinder among a plurality of orthogonal faces of said block resonator filter to tune said filter.
a and 1b are two views of the fundamental triple-mode mono-block shape.
a and 3b are solid and wire-frame views of the mono-block with a third corner cut.
a illustrates a method of tuning the mono-block by removing small circular areas of the conductive surface from a particular face of the mono-block.
b illustrates tuning resonant frequencies of the three modes in the block using indentations or circles in three orthogonal sides.
a and b illustrate tuning resonant frequencies of the three modes in the block using metallic or dielectric tuners attached to three orthogonal sides (
a, b, c and d illustrate a method for the input/output coupling for the triple-mode mono-block filter.
a and 12b illustrate an assembly configuration in which the low pass filter is fabricated on the same circuit board that supports the mono-block filter and mask filter.
a, b and c illustrate a mono-block filter packaged in a box (
a and b are photographs of the mask filter.
a) and (b) illustrate another preferred embodiment, including a triple-mode mono-block delay filter.
a) and (b) illustrate solid views of the triple-mode mono-block delay filter according to the present invention.
It is desirable to reduce the size and cost of the filter assemblies beyond what is currently possible with metallic combline structures which are presently used to attenuate undesired signals. The present invention incorporates triple-mode resonators into an assembly that includes a mask filter and a low pass filter such that the entire assembly provides the extended frequency range attenuation of the unwanted signal.
The assembly is integrated in a way that minimizes the required volume and affords easy mounting onto a circuit board.
Triple-Mode Mono-Block Cavity
Filters employing triple-mode mono-block cavities afford the opportunity of significantly reducing the overall volume of the filter package and reducing cost, while maintaining acceptable electrical performance. The size reduction has two sources. First, a triple-mode mono-block resonator has three resonators in one block. (Each resonator provides one pole to the filter response). This provides a 3-fold reduction in size compared to filters currently used which disclose one resonator per block. Secondly, the resonators are not air-filled coaxial resonators as in the standard combline construction, but are now dielectric-filled blocks. In a preferred embodiment, they are a solid block of ceramic coated with a conductive metal layer, typically silver. The high dielectric constant material allows the resonator to shrink in size by approximately the square root of the dielectric constant, while maintaining the same operating frequency. In a preferred embodiment, the ceramic used has a dielectric constant between 35 and 36 and a Q of 2,000. In another embodiment, the dielectric constant is 44 with a Q of 1,500. Although the Q is lower, the resonator is smaller due to the higher dielectric constant. In still another preferred embodiment, the dielectric constant is 21 with a Q of 3,000.
Furthermore, because the mono-block cavities are self-contained resonators, no metallic housing is required. The cost reduction from eliminating the metallic housing is greater than the additional cost of using dielectric-filled resonators as opposed to air-filled resonators.
The concept of a mono-block is not new. However, this is the first triple-mode mono-block resonator. In addition, the ability to package the plated mono-block triple-mode resonator filled with low loss, high dielectric constant material into a practical filter and assembly is novel and unobvious.
The basic design for a triple-mode mono-block resonator 10 is shown in
The three resonant modes in a triple-mode mono-block resonator are typically denoted as TE011, TM101, and TE110 (or sometimes as TE11□, TM1□1, and TE 1□1), where TE indicates a transverse electric mode, TM indicates a transverse magnetic mode, and the three successive indices (often written as subscripts) indicate the number of half-wavelengths along the x, y and z directions.
Corner Cuts
The input and output power is coupled to and from the mono-block 10 by a probe 20 inserted into an input/output port 21 in the mono-block 10 as seen in
Corner cuts 30, 33 are used to couple a mode oriented in one direction to a mode oriented in a second mutually orthogonal direction. Each coupling represents one pole in the filter's response. Therefore, the triple-mode mono-block discussed above represents the equivalent of three poles or three electrical resonators.
Tuning
Tuning: Like most other high precision, radio frequency filters, the filter disclosed here is tuned to optimize the filter response. Mechanical tolerances and uncertainty in the dielectric constant necessitate the tuning. The ability to tune, or adjust, the resonant frequencies of the triple-mode mono-block resonator 10 enhances the manufacturability of a filter assembly that employs triple-mode mono-blocks as resonant elements. Ideally, one should be able to tune each of the three resonant modes in the mono-block independently of each other. In addition, one should be able to tune a mode's resonant frequency either higher or lower.
Four novel and unobvious methods of tuning are disclosed. The first tuning method is to mechanically grind areas on three orthogonal faces of the mono-block 10 in order to change the resonant frequencies of the three modes in each block. By grinding the areas, ceramic dielectric material is removed, thereby changing the resonant frequencies of the resonant modes.
This method is mechanically simple, but is complicated by the fact that the grinding of one face of the mono-block 10 will affect the resonant frequencies of all three modes. A computer-aided analysis is required for the production environment, whereby the affect of grinding a given amount of material away from a given face is known and controlled.
Another method of tuning frequency is to cut a slot 50, 52 within a face 60 of the resonator 10 (see
They are used to adjust the resonant frequencies of the three modes in the one block 12. Tuning for only one block is shown in this figure. Tuning for the second block (the one on the left) 10 would be similar.
The fourth tuning method disclosed here is the use of discrete tuning elements or cylinders 80, 82, 84.
The description above is focused mainly on the use of a triple-mode mono-block 10 in a filter. It should be understood that this disclosure also covers the use of the triple-mode mono-block filter as part of a multiplexer, where two or more filters are connected to a common port. One or more of the multiple filters could be formed from the triple-mode mono-blocks.
Input/Output
Input/Output: A proper method for transmitting a microwave signal into (input) and out of (output) the triple-mode mono-block filter is by the use of probes. The input probe excites an RF wave comprising of a plurality of modes. The corner cuts then couple the different modes. K. Sano and M. Miyashita, “Application of the Planar I/O Terminal to Dual-Mode Dielectric-Waveguide Filter,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., pp. 2491–2495, December 2000, hereby incorporated by reference, discloses a dual-mode mono-block having an input/output terminal which functions as a patch antenna to radiate power into and out of the mono-block.
The method disclosed in the present invention is to form an indentation 90 in the mono-block (in particular, a cylindrical hole was used here), plate the interior of that hole 90 with a conductor (typically, but not necessarily, silver), and then connect the metallic surface to a circuit external to the filter/mono-block, as shown in
Since the probe 100 is integrated into the mono-block 10, play between the probe and the block is reduced. This is an improvement over the prior art where an external probe 100 was inserted into a hole 90 in the block 100. Power handling problems occurred due to gaps between the probe 100 and the hole 90.
Integrated Filter Assembly Comprising a Preselect or Mask Filter, a Triple-Mode Mono-Block Resonator and a Low-Pass Filter
Several features/techniques have been developed to make the triple-mode mono-block filter a practical device. These features and techniques are described below and form the claims for this disclosure.
Filter Assembly: The novel and unobvious filter assembly 110 consisting of three parts, the mono-block resonator 10, premask (or mask) 120 and low-pass filters 130, can take one of several embodiments. In one embodiment, the thee filter elements are combined as shown in
The low pass filter 130 shown in
In a second embodiment, the circuit board supporting the filter assembly 110 is an integral part of the circuit board that is formed by other parts of the transmit and/or receive system, such as the antenna, amplifier, or analog to digital converter. As an example,
In a third embodiment, the filter assembly 110 is contained in a box and connectors are provided either as coaxial connectors or as pads that can be soldered to another circuit board in a standard soldering operation.
Preselect or Mask Filter: Common to any resonant device such as a filter is the problem of unwanted spurious modes, or unwanted resonances. This problem is especially pronounced in multi-mode resonators like the triple-mode mono-block 10, 12. For a triple-mode mono-block 10, 12 designed for a pass band centered at 1.95 GHz, the first resonance will occur near 2.4 GHz. In order to alleviate this problem, we disclose the use of a relatively wide-bandwidth mask filter 120, packaged with the mono-block filter 10, 12.
The premask filter 120 acts as a wide-bandwidth bandpass filter which straddles the triple-mode mono-block 10, 12 passband response. Its passband is wider than the triple-mode mono-block 10, 12 resonator's passband. Therefore, it won't affect signals falling within the passband of the triple-mode mono-block resonator 10, 12. However, it will provide additional rejection in the stopband. Therefore, it will reject the first few spurious modes following the triple-mode mono-block resonator's 10, 12 passband. See
In example 1, a filter assembly was designed for 3G application. In a preferred embodiment, it is used in a Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) base station. It had an output frequency of about f0=2.00 GHz and rejection specification out to 12.00 GHz. The receive bandwidth is 1920 to 1980 MHz. The transmit bandwidth is 2110 to 2170 MHz. In the stopband for transmit mode, the attenuation needs to be 90 dB from 2110 to 2170 MHz, 55 dB from 2170 to 5 GHz and 30 dB from 5 GHz to 12.00 GHz. A preselect or mask filter 120 was selected with a passband from 1800 MHz to 2050 MHz and a 60 dB notch at 2110 MHz. Between 2110 MHz and 5 GHz it provides 30 dB of attenuation.
In example 1, the mask filter 120 has a 250 MHz bandwidth and is based on a 4-pole combline design with one cross coupling that aids in achieving the desired out-of-band rejection. A photograph of the mask filter 120 is shown in
Low Pass Filter: It is common for a cellular base station filter specification to have some level of signal rejection required at frequencies that are several times greater than the pass band. For example, a filter with a pass band at 1900 MHz may have a rejection specification at 12,000 MHz. For standard combline filters, a coaxial low-pass filter provides rejection at frequencies significantly above the pass band. For the filter package disclosed here, the low pass filter 130 is fabricated in microstrip or stripline, and is integrated into (or etched onto) the circuit board that already supports and is connected to the mono-block filter 10, 12 and the mask filter 120. The exact design of the low pass filter 130 would depend on the specific electrical requirements to be met. One possible configuration is shown in
Delay Filter
In another non-limiting, exemplary embodiment, a delay filter is provided that is designed for its flat, group delay characteristics. For example, but not by way of limitation, in this embodiment, the delay filter is not designed for any particular frequency rejection.
To achieve a flat group delay, it is necessary to have a prescribed cross-coupling scheme. For example, but not by way of limitation, in a six-pole filter, at least modes 1–2, 2–3, 3–4, 4–5 and 5–6 would be coupled. Further, prescribed cross-couplings are used to help meet certain frequency rejection specifications. In the case of the present embodiment, the cross couplings used to flatten the delay are 1–6 and 2–5 for a six-pole filter.
To implement the foregoing embodiment, a geometry as illustrated in
As described in greater detail above, the triple-mode mono-block delay filter includes two triple-mode mono-block cavity resonators 10, 12. Each triple-mode mono-block resonator has three resonator modes in one block. The three types of resonant modes that are being used are the TM101, TE110, and TE011 modes, which are mutually orthogonal. In
An input/output probe e.g., 20 is connected to each metal plated dielectric block e.g., 10 to transmit the microwave signals. The coupling between resonant modes within each cavity is accomplished by the above-described corner cuts 30, 33, 36. Corner cuts are used to couple a mode oriented in one direction to a mode oriented in a second mutually orthogonal direction. There are two main corner cuts 30, 33 to couple the three resonant modes in each cavity, one oriented along the x-axis and one oriented along the y-axis. An aperture 40 between the two blocks 10, 12 is used to couple all six resonant modes 1 . . . 6 together between the cavities. The aperture 40 generates two inductive couplings by magnetic fields between two modes, and one capacitive coupling by electric fields. In addition, a third corner cut 36 along the z-axis can be used to cancel the undesired coupling among resonators. A wire frame view of the triple-mode mono-block delay filter is shown in
a) and (b) show the solid views of the two mono-blocks 10, 12 coupled to form a 6-pole delay filter. Corner cuts 30, 33, 36 are used to couple a mode oriented in one direction to a mode oriented in a second mutually orthogonal direction within a mono-block cavity. Each coupling represents one pole in the filter's response. Therefore, one triple-mode mono-block discussed above represents the equivalent of three poles or three electrical resonators.
The aperture 40 performs the function of generating three couplings among all six resonant modes for delay filter, instead of two couplings for the regular bandpass filter. The aperture 40 generates two inductive couplings by magnetic fields between modes 3 and 4, modes 2 and 5; and one positive capacitive coupling by electric fields between modes 1 and 6, as shown in
While the invention has been disclosed in this patent application by reference to the details of preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be understood that the disclosure is intended in an illustrative, rather than a limiting sense, as it is contemplated that modifications will readily occur to those skilled in the art, within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This is a continuation-in-part application of application Ser. No. 09/987,353 filed Nov. 14, 2001, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4431977 | Sokola et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4607242 | Cozzie | Aug 1986 | A |
4614920 | Tong | Sep 1986 | A |
4675630 | Tang | Jun 1987 | A |
4691179 | Blum et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
5083102 | Zaki | Jan 1992 | A |
5325077 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5589807 | Tang | Dec 1996 | A |
5783979 | Andoh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5821837 | Accatino et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5859574 | Schmitt | Jan 1999 | A |
5926079 | Heine et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6020800 | Arakawa et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6081175 | Duong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6275125 | Takei et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6356170 | Aralawa et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359534 | Hunter | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6484043 | Klein et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6507254 | Hattori et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535086 | Liang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552628 | Jang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556106 | Sano | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563397 | Jang | May 2003 | B1 |
6853271 | Wilber et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
20010000656 | Arakawa et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010028287 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020003461 | Hunter | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020041221 | Abdulnour | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020093395 | Jang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020186103 | Ando et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030090343 | Wilber et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117244 | Matsuura et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050128031 | Wilber | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0742603 | Nov 1996 | EP |
1 122 807 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1313164 | May 2003 | EP |
1265313 | Dec 2003 | EP |
406177607 | Jun 1994 | JP |
09148810 | Jun 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030090344 A1 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09987353 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 10277971 | US |