This disclosure relates generally to an optical system with emitting and receiving waveguides and an Echelle grating. More particularly, embodiments herein relate to an optical system for multiplexing or de-multiplexing via emitting and receiving waveguides and an Echelle grating.
Diffraction gratings may be used in various optical instruments such as monochromators, lasers, or for holographic memory. An Echelle grating is one type of diffraction grating where the input light travels through a medium and multi-path interference of light can cause the wavelengths of the reflected light to combine or separate. The different optical paths traveled by the light can lead to phase errors.
The diffraction grating design can affect the design and performance of an optical component, such as the spacing between the input and output channels of the optical component, which can lead to unwanted channel crosstalk. Additionally, small variations in the reflective facets of the diffraction grating caused by imperfections in the grating material may generate optical losses and deviations in the reflected light.
Embodiments of the systems, devices, methods, and apparatuses described in the present disclosure are directed to a photonics device for de-multiplexing light. Also described are systems, devices, methods, and apparatuses directed to receiving light in a wavelength range and outputting light in a first wavelength band and a second wavelength band, which may be separated by at least 0.1 μm. An input waveguide may provide the light through a planar waveguide and reflect off of a diffraction grating, as a first output light received by a first output waveguide and a second output light received by a second output waveguide. The input waveguide may be positioned between the first and second output waveguides.
In some examples, the present disclosure describes an optical device. The optical device may include a planar waveguide that defines an input light path, an input waveguide, and a set of grating facets. The input waveguide may emit light along the input light path and the set of grating facets may receive the emitted light from the input waveguide and may reflect the emitted light as a first reflected light and a second reflected light. The optical device may include a first output waveguide defining a first reflected light path and configured to receive the first reflected light along the first reflected light path and a second output waveguide defining a second reflected light path and configured to receive the second reflected light along the second reflected light path. In some examples, the input waveguide may be located between the first output waveguide and the second output waveguide and the emitted light may be in a broadband wavelength range. In some examples the first reflected light may be in a first wavelength range and the second reflected light may be in a second wavelength range spaced apart from the first wavelength range by at least 0.1 μm.
In some examples, the input waveguide may be located at a first position on a Rowland circle, the first output waveguide may be located at a second position on the Rowland circle, and the second output waveguide may be located at a third position on the Rowland circle. In some examples, the set of grating facets may reflect a first wavelength range of light at a first angle and to the first output waveguide and may reflect a second wavelength range of light at a second angle and to the second output waveguide, where the first angle is equal to the second angle. In some examples, the first angle may be between the input light path and at least one of first or second output light paths, and the first angle may be selected such that an optical loss associated with the first wavelength range of light is equal to an optical loss associated with the second wavelength range of light. In still further examples, a power distribution of the first wavelength range of light may be received by the first output waveguide, and the second wavelength range of light received by the second output waveguide is based at least in part on a blaze angle of the set of grating facets.
In some examples, the present disclosure describes an optical device. The optical device may include a light emitting element, a light receiving element and a diffraction grating. The light emitting element may emit input light along an input light path and positioned at a first location on a Rowland circle. The light receiving element may receive reflected light along a reflected light path and positioned at a second location on the Rowland circle. The diffraction grating may receive light from the light emitting element, traveling along its input light path, and may reflect light along the reflected light path to the light receiving element. In some examples, the reflected light path is a first reflected light path, the light receiving element is a first light receiving element, and the optical device may include a second light receiving element configured to receive reflected light along a second reflected light path. Continuing the example, at least a subset of a set of grating mirrors may be configured to receive light in a first wavelength band of light, and the first wavelength band of light may include a second wavelength band of light reflected along the first reflected light path to the first light receiving element and a third wavelength band of light separated from the second wavelength band of light, the third wavelength band of light reflected along a third reflected light path to the second light receiving element. Additionally, the input light path is located between the reflected light path and the second reflected light path. In some examples, the second wavelength band of light and the third wavelength band of light may have approximately equal average transmission powers. In some examples, the second wavelength band of light may be spaced apart from the third wavelength band of light by a 0.1 μm separation wavelength band. In some examples, the diffraction grating is an Echelle grating.
In some examples, the light emitting element may be a first light emitting element, the input light may be a first input light, the input light path may be a first input light path, the optical device may include a second light emitting element that may emit second input light along a second input light path, and the light receiving element may be located between the first light emitting element and the second light emitting element. In still further examples, the light receiving element may be a first light receiving element, the reflected light path may be a first reflected light path, and the optical device may include a second light receiving element that may receive second reflected light on a second reflected light path. In still further examples, the light receiving element may be a first light receiving element, the reflected light path may be a first reflected light path, the reflected light is a first reflected light, and the optical device may include a second light receiving element that may receive second reflected light on a second reflected light path, where the first light receiving element and the second light receiving element are both located on a first side of the light emitting element. In some examples, the optical device may include a doped material positioned between the light emitting element and the light receiving element.
In some examples, the present disclosure describes a method for splitting light. The method may include emitting light in a broadband wavelength range, reflecting the light from an Echelle grating in the broadband wavelength range, receiving a first reflected light in a first wavelength band, and receiving a second reflected light in a second wavelength band, the second wavelength band separated from the first wavelength band by at least 0.1 μm. In some examples, the method may include emitting light on an optical path between a first reflected optical path and a second reflected optical path. In some examples, the method may include emitting light comprises emitting light from a first position on a Rowland circle, receiving the first reflected light comprises receiving the first reflected light at a second position on the Rowland circle, and receiving the second reflected light comprises receiving the second reflected light at a third position on the Rowland circle. In some examples, the first position on the Rowland circle may be between the second position and the third position.
It should be understood that the proportions and dimensions (either relative or absolute) of the various features and elements (and collections and groupings thereof) and the boundaries, separations, and positional relationships presented between them, are provided in the accompanying figures merely to facilitate an understanding of the various embodiments described herein and, accordingly, may not necessarily be presented or illustrated to scale, and are not intended to indicate any preference or requirement for an illustrated embodiment to the exclusion of embodiments described with reference thereto.
Reference will now be made in detail to representative embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the following description is not intended to limit the embodiments to one preferred embodiment. To the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can be included within the spirit and scope of the described embodiments as defined by the appended claims.
Generally, diffraction gratings may be designed to reduce channel crosstalk, phase errors, and optical losses to the input and output light. Different factors that may be considered when designing an optical component with a diffraction grating may include, but are not limited to, the positioning of the input waveguide(s) and the output waveguide(s) relative to one another, the radius of curvature of the diffraction grating, the input and output wavelength(s), the angle between the input waveguide(s) and the output waveguide(s), and so forth. In some examples, the input waveguide(s) and the output waveguide(s) may provide a reduced footprint size of the diffraction grating.
Additionally, the performance of the diffraction grating may be sensitive to the quality of the reflector facets, also known as the facets, or the grating teeth. The terms “reflector facets,” “teeth,” “grating teeth,” and “facets,” may be used interchangeably herein. The fabrication of the diffraction grating may affect the size of the reflective facets as defining the facets in a planar substrate may be difficult, especially when the reflective teeth have a small width and/or small height. The fabrication process may produce corner effects, such as rounded corners, that can cause undirected scattering of light.
Disclosed herein are optical components including a diffraction grating. The optical component may include a diffraction grating, an input waveguide(s) and an output waveguide(s). The input waveguide may be located between the output waveguides and all of the waveguides may be located on or near a Rowland circle. The placement of the first location(s) between the second location(s) (or vice versa) can reduce the footprint size of the device.
In some examples, the diffraction grating can be a de-multiplexer that separates the input wavelength band of light into at least two output wavelength bands of light that are separated from one another. In some examples, the optical component may have angles between the input and output waveguides that are similar or are the same. Similar angles between the input and output waveguides may produce similar optical losses of the different wavelength bands. The angle selection can reduce the differences in average transmissions between the different wavelength bands and can increase the diffraction efficiency.
In some examples, the width, height, and blaze angle of the reflective facets can be tuned to lead to easier fabrication, to reduce the amount of fluctuations in optical losses, to reduce the size of the device, and so forth.
These and other embodiments are discussed below with reference to
Representative applications of methods and apparatuses according to the present disclosure are described in this section. These examples are being provided solely to add context and aid in the understanding of the described examples. It will thus be apparent to one skilled in the art that the described examples may be practiced without some or all of the specific details. Other applications are possible, such that the following examples should not be taken as limiting.
The optical component 100 may separate the output light 120 and the light separation may be wavelength dependent. The light may be separated and output as individual wavelengths or wavelength bands. In some examples, the input light 110 may be in a wavelength range of approximately 1.3 μm-2.5 μm and the output light 120A and 120B may be in two separate wavelength bands, both of which may be within the input light wavelength range. The separation of the input light will be discussed in further detail with reference to
The input light 110 may be provided by an input waveguide 115 and the output light 120 may be received by output waveguides 125A and 125B. As discussed herein, the output waveguides may be referred to as output waveguides 125 or individually with a separate element number for each output waveguide such as output waveguide 125A and 125B. In some examples, the input and output waveguides may be strip waveguides. Although the input light 110 may be discussed as emitting light into the optical component 100, it may be understood that a light source not illustrated in
Optical Component with a Diffraction Grating
In
The input waveguide 215 may emit input light 210 into a planar waveguide or slab waveguide 260, where the slab waveguide is represented by the shaded area. In
In some examples, the input light 210 may be received by the input waveguide 215 from one or more light emitters (not shown in
Also shown in the expanded section of
The locations of the input waveguide 215 and the output waveguides 225 may depend at least partially on the radius of curvature of the diffraction grating 230. In some examples, the input waveguide 215 and the output waveguides 225 are located adjacent to the Rowland circle 240, and the Rowland circle 240 depends on the radius of curvature of the diffraction grating 230. Additionally, the reflective facets 250 of the diffraction grating 230 may determine the angle at which the input light reflects off of the diffraction grating 230 in conjunction with the radius of curvature of the diffraction grating 230. In turn, the angle at which the light reflects determines the location of the output waveguides 225 on the Rowland circle 240. Although the input and output waveguides are discussed as being located on the Rowland circle 240, in some examples, the input and output waveguides may not be located on the Rowland circle 240.
In
Angle 370A may be between the input light path 310 and the output light path 320A. Angle 370B may be between the input light path 310 and the output light path 320B. The angles 370A and 370B can depend on various factors including, but not limited to, the properties of the diffraction grating 330 (e.g., spacing of the reflective facets, radius of curvature of the diffraction grating, and so forth) and the wavelength of the input light 310. In the example of
In some example embodiments, a “broadband wavelength range” may be generally a set of emitted broadband wavelengths and/or detected broadband wavelengths over the approximate range of 1 μm. In some examples, the 1 μm emitted and/or detected broadband wavelengths may be in the “broadband” range of approximately 1.0 μm and 3.0 μm. Accordingly, embodiments described herein may operate over, or employ, an operating range that may correspond to, or be encompassed in, a broadband wavelength range. Examples of such operating ranges include 1.0 μm-2.0 μm, 1.3 μm-2.3 μm, 1.4 μm-2.4 μm, 1.5 μm-2.5 μm, and so forth. Although specific wavelength ranges may be discussed, any appropriate wavelength or wavelength range may be emitted and/or detected by the photonics elements described herein, depending on the use and construction of those elements.
In some examples, the diffraction grating 330 may be an Echelle grating. The Echelle grating may be designed to have a reduced footprint size by leveraging the wavelength separation between the first wavelength band and the second wavelength band. With the separation between wavelength bands, the optical component 300 may include separate waveguides which may be coupled to separate detectors for detecting the different wavelength bands. For example, as shown in
An Echelle grating may be multi-functional and used for either one or both of diffraction and refocusing of the input light. The multi-functional diffraction grating can lead to a reduction in the grating size and the overall optical device size, but in some examples this may lead to the possible locations of the input and output waveguides being reduced. By separating the output wavelength bands using the multi-functional diffraction grating, the location options of the input waveguide 315 and the output waveguides 325 can increase.
In
The radius of curvature of the diffraction grating 330 and thus, the radius of the Rowland circle 335 can be selected by considering one or more of: the angles 370, the location of the input waveguide 315, and the location of the output waveguides 325. By placing the input waveguide 315 between the output waveguides 325 (or vice versa in the example of
In addition to reducing the footprint size, the diffraction grating design may be configured to improve optical performance. In some examples, the optical performance may be improved by reducing the optical loss of the optical component 300. In
In some examples, the diffraction grating 330 of
As shown in
In some examples, a wider reflective facet width 410B can result in less rounding of the corners of the grating teeth during fabrication processes. Reducing the amount of rounding of the corners of the grating teeth can result in reducing the amount of undirected, scattered light. In some examples, the rounded corners may cause unwanted, large fluctuations in the optical losses. In some examples, the diffraction grating 400B may be able to tolerate rounded corners when the reflective facet width 410B is larger. Further, in some examples, the reflective facet width 410B may be related to the targeted reflected wavelength or ranges of wavelengths. For example, the reflective facet width 410B may be increased to accommodate an increased target wavelength or range of wavelengths.
In some examples, the size of the optical component may be balanced with the optical performance. For example, the diffractive grating design may not be based solely on the lowest possible reflective facet angle and the allowable size of the diffraction grating 400B. Other factors may be considered such as the complexity of the fabrication, as discussed herein.
In some examples, the diffraction grating 400B may have a selected blaze angle 405B and the dispersion of light may be related to the blaze angle. In some instances, when the angle between the input light and a ray of normal incidence to the reflective facet is approximately equal to the blaze angle, light at a certain grating order may have improved diffraction efficiency.
In
In some examples, the larger height 415C can reduce the complexity of the fabrication of the diffraction grating 400C. As one example, the height 415C can be approximately 0.547 μm for the diffraction grating 400C, whereas the height 415B can be approximately 0.275 μm for the diffraction grating 400B. Because the blaze angle is related to the angle between the input light and the output light, the angle between the input and output light may be used to select the height 415C.
In some examples, the angle between the input and output light may be tuned such that the optical loss associated with the first wavelength band (e.g., of a first input light path) can be similar to the optical loss associated with the second wavelength band (e.g., of the second input light path). In some examples, the diffracted output light may overlap with the input light, which may help reduce imaging problems specific to optical components that use broadband wavelength ranges of light.
The power of the light for the first wavelength band relative to the second wavelength band may differ more with a smaller blaze angle than with a larger blaze angle, so the larger angle may be selected such that the difference in the output light transmissions between the first wavelength band (of the first input light) and the second wavelength band (of the second input light) is reduced. In some examples, the average transmission of the first wavelength band may be equal to the average transmission of the second wavelength band.
In some examples, the diffraction grating may have blaze angles to reflect light such that an optical separation is maintained between an input waveguide (e.g., to a laser) and an output waveguide (e.g., to a detector). Without the optical separation, the waveguides may be subject to optical coupling that can lead to unwanted effects such as the self-mode of light in the input waveguide competing with a lasing mode. The self-mode of light in the input waveguide may be due to light reflecting from the diffraction grating that may return to the input waveguide and can cause self-mode lasing.
In some examples, the wavelengths received at the output waveguide(s) can be associated with a lower level of granularity such that the wavelength band between 2.0 μm-2.1 μm may be extracted. A lower level of granularity can refer to a large spacing between wavelengths so that a signal may be detected at the output waveguide(s). In some examples, the angles between the input waveguide(s) and the output waveguide(s) may be related to the extracted wavelength band.
The optical performance of the diffraction grating may be sensitive to the quality of the fabrication and the grating material and the fabrication of the diffraction grating may present challenges, especially when the reflective facet width and/or height of the teeth are small. For example, variations and imperfections of the reflect facet of the diffraction grating can lead to phase errors, optical crosstalk, variations in the path lengths of the returned light, variations in the scattering, or the like. In addition to or instead of configuring the diffraction grating design in consideration of the size of the optical component and the optical performance, other considerations may include fabrication costs, yield, and complexity.
Although the disclosed examples have been fully described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be noted that various changes and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being included within the scope of the disclosed examples as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a nonprovisional of and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/897,553, filed Sep. 9, 2019, and entitled “Echelle Grating Design,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5287376 | Paoli | Feb 1994 | A |
5488678 | Taneya | Jan 1996 | A |
5644667 | Tabuchi | Jul 1997 | A |
5742631 | Paoli | Apr 1998 | A |
5818989 | Nakamura | Oct 1998 | A |
6122042 | Wunderman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6330378 | Forrest | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6393185 | Deacon | May 2002 | B1 |
6594409 | Dutt et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628686 | Sargent | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657723 | Cohen | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6795622 | Forrest | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6892449 | Brophy et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6940182 | Hilton et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947639 | Singh | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952504 | Bi | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954568 | Liu | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6987906 | Nakama et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7054517 | Mossberg | May 2006 | B2 |
7058245 | Farahi | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079715 | Kish | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7203401 | Mossberg | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7203426 | Wu et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209611 | Joyner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7245379 | Schwabe | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7283694 | Welch | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7314451 | Halperin et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327918 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7366364 | Singh | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7447393 | Yan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7460742 | Joyner | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477384 | Schwabe | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483599 | Dominic et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7526007 | Chua et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7558301 | Lin et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7680364 | Nilsson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7720328 | Yan | May 2010 | B2 |
7885302 | Eberhard | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7885492 | Welch | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7974504 | Nagarajan | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8300994 | Welch et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8559775 | Babie et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564784 | Wang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8724100 | Asghari et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8920332 | Hong et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8983250 | Black et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9020004 | Jeong | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9031412 | Nagarajan | May 2015 | B2 |
9110259 | Black | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9135397 | Denyer et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9217669 | Wu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9348154 | Hayakawa | May 2016 | B2 |
9370689 | Guillama et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9405066 | Mahgerefteh | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9543736 | Barwicz et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9620931 | Tanaka | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9766370 | Aloe et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9804027 | Fish et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9829631 | Lambert | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9880352 | Florjanczyk | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9943237 | Baker et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9948063 | Caneau et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10009668 | Liboiron-Ladouceur | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10132996 | Lambert | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10238351 | Halperin et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10285898 | Douglas et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10310196 | Hutchison | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10359571 | Horth | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10429597 | ten Have et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10529003 | Mazed | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10687718 | Allee et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10852492 | Vermeulen et al. | Dec 2020 | B1 |
11231319 | Tu et al. | Jan 2022 | B1 |
20030091265 | Lin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20050053112 | Shams-Zadeh-Amiri | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050063431 | Gallup et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050151966 | Packirisamy | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060002443 | Farber et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080044128 | Kish et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080310470 | Ooi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20120002924 | Okayama | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20140029943 | Mathai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140233891 | Pottier | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20160224750 | Kethman et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170164878 | Connor | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20190339468 | Evans | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190342009 | Evans | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20200152615 | Krasulick et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200244045 | Bismuto et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200253547 | Harris et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200309593 | Bismuto et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210033805 | Bishop et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20220091338 | Tu et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220099889 | Arbore et al. | Mar 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1403985 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1432045 | Jun 2004 | EP |
H04204508 | Jul 1992 | JP |
H06003709 | Jan 1994 | JP |
2007279240 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008262118 | Oct 2008 | JP |
WO 01014929 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 04031824 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 05091036 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 11090274 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 17040431 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 17184420 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO 17184423 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO 19152990 | Aug 2019 | WO |
WO 20106974 | May 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gonzalez-Sanchez et al., “Capacitive Sensing for Non-Invasive Breathing and Heart Monitoring in Non-Restrained, Non-Sedated Laboratory Mice,” Sensors 2016, vol. 16, No. 1052, pp. 1-16. |
Kybartas et al., “Capacitive Sensor for Respiratory Monitoring,” Conference “Biomedical Engineering,” Nov. 2015, 6 pages. |
Lapedus, “Electroplating IC Packages—Tooling challenges increase as advanced packaging ramps up,” Semiconductor Engineering, https://semiengineering.com/electroplating-ic-packages, Apr. 10, 2017, 22 pages. |
Materials and Processes for Electronic Applications, Series Editor: James J. Licari, AvanTeco, Whittier, California, Elsevier Inc., 2009, 20 pages. |
Worhoff et al., “Flip-chip assembly for photonic circuits,” MESA+ Research Institute, University of Twente, Integrated Optical MicroSystems Group, The Netherlands, 12 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/650,804, filed Mar. 25, 2020, Arbore et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/254,810, filed Dec. 21, 2020, Bishop et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/725,418, filed Apr. 20, 2022, Wu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/851,252, filed Jun. 28, 2022, Wu. |
He et al., “Integrated Polarization Compensator for WDM Waveguide Demultiplexers,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters vol. 11, No. 2, Feb. 1999, pp. 224-226. |
Krubhakar et al., “Design and fabrication of integrated optical 1×8 power splitter in SOI substrate using large cross-section single-mode waveguides,” Photonics 2010: Tenth International Conference on Fiber Optics and Photonics, Proceeding of SPIE, Bellingham, Washington, vol. 8173, No. 1, Dec. 29, 2010, pp. 1-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62897553 | Sep 2019 | US |