The present disclosure relates generally to a dimensioning system for, and a method of, dimensioning freight in motion along an unconstrained path in a venue, and, more particularly, to dimensioning the freight while the freight is being moved by a freight mover, such as an industrial vehicle, prior to loading the freight into a container.
Industrial vehicles, such as forklifts, lift and move freight, typically mounted on pallets, from warehouses or like venues into containers for transport by land, rail, water, and air, etc. Recipients of the freight are typically charged by the dimensions (volume) and weight of the freight. As such, the freight is often dimensioned and/or weighed prior to loading. Knowing the dimensions of the freight is also useful for determining the order in which the freight is to be loaded, and to fill as much of the container as possible for efficient handling and distribution.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions and locations of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of the illustrated embodiments.
The system and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the illustrated embodiments so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
In some known systems, a forklift lifts and advances freight to a dimensioning station while waiting for access to the dimensioning station. The forklift then stops and lowers the freight onto the dimensioning station, and then retreats and backs away from the dimensioning station while the freight is being dimensioned. While the freight is stationary at the dimensioning station, a set of overhead laser scanners with range finders are moved above and past the freight over a time period during which the freight is scanned, and range information from the freight is captured. The range information is processed by processing equipment to obtain dimensions of the freight. After the scanning, the forklift starts again, returns to the station, lifts the freight off the station, and then advances to the container into which the freight is to be loaded. Although generally useful, this known dimensioning procedure has drawbacks not only due to the high cost of the scanners and associated processing equipment, but also, perhaps more importantly, due to the interrupted movement of the freight. As described, the forklift repeatedly stops and starts, and the scanning/dimensioning of each item of freight takes a non-negligible amount of time to be performed. This loading procedure for the container is thus delayed.
In some known systems, packages are placed directly on a moving conveyor belt to advance the moving packages along a constrained, fixed, known path, and at a known speed, and with an unchanging orientation, through a dimensioning station. As each package moves by increments through the dimensioning station, one or more ranging measurements are taken for each increment, thereby resulting in a multitude of such ranging measurements that are then combined and processed correctly to obtain accurate, overall dimensions of each package. Although generally useful, this known dimensioning procedure has drawbacks, because it takes a non-negligible amount of time to place the packages on, and to remove the packages from, the conveyor belt. This loading procedure for the container is thus delayed.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to expedite, and more efficiently conduct, the loading procedure, and to dimension the freight in an uninterrupted, frictionless, continuous, rapid, and more cost-effective and flexible manner prior to loading, preferably while the freight is being moved by a forklift or like industrial vehicle.
Example methods and apparatus disclosed herein provide a dimensioning system for dimensioning moving freight along an unconstrained path in a venue, such as a warehouse or a like facility, either indoors or outdoors. An example dimensioning system disclosed herein includes a ranging system for capturing a plurality of successive point clouds from the moving freight, a tracking system for tracking a plurality of successive positions and orientations of the moving freight, and a computing device (e.g., a server, processor, or programmed microprocessor) in communication with the ranging and tracking systems. In operation, the computing device correlates each successive point cloud with each successive position and orientation of the moving freight, combines the correlated point clouds to obtain a composite point cloud of the moving freight, and processes the composite point cloud to dimension the moving freight. Advantageously, the tracking system assigns a time stamp to each successive position and orientation of the moving freight, and correlates each successive point cloud with each successive time-stamped position and orientation of the moving freight. Once the freight is dimensioned, it may, for example, be efficiently loaded into a container, typically for transport by land, rail, water, and air, etc.
In some examples disclosed herein, a freight mover, such as a forklift, moves the freight along the unconstrained path in the venue through a dimensioning zone past the ranging and tracking systems. The ranging system includes one or more three-dimensional (3D) cameras stationarily mounted in the venue and deployed about the dimensioning zone through which the freight is moved. Each 3D camera has a field of view over which each point cloud is captured from the freight. The 3D cameras have camera sensors directed at the moving freight along different lines of sight. The composite point cloud includes data points from the freight and from the freight mover, and the computing device is operative for extracting the data points from the freight mover from the composite point cloud, for enclosing the extracted composite point cloud with a bounding box having dimensions, and for dimensioning the moving freight from the dimensions of the bounding box.
The tracking system includes a detector mounted on the freight mover or in the venue, and detects each successive position and orientation of the moving freight. In some embodiments, the tracking system includes an emitter for emitting a signal, and the detector detects the emitted signal. In some embodiments, either one of the emitter or the detector is mounted on the freight mover for joint movement therewith, and the other of the emitter and the detector is mounted in the venue remotely from the freight mover. In some embodiments, the emitter includes one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs) mounted on the freight mover for emitting light in a predetermined light pattern, and the detector includes one or more cameras stationarily mounted in the venue for detecting the predetermined light pattern. In some embodiments, the detector includes a camera mounted on the freight mover, and the camera images one or more features arranged at known, fixed locations in the venue to locate each successive position and orientation of the moving freight.
In accordance with this disclosure, dimensioning the freight does not require the freight to be held stationary at a dimensioning station. Nor does the freight have to be moved along the constrained path of a conveyor belt, or have to be loaded onto the conveyor belt and be unloaded therefrom to be dimensioned. Rather, example methods and apparatus disclosed herein enable dimensioning of the freight while the freight is in motion, for example, while being continuously advanced to the container, thereby expediting the loading procedure and rendering the loading procedure more efficient.
An example method disclosed herein is directed to dimensioning a moving freight in motion along an unconstrained path in a venue. The example method includes capturing a plurality of successive point clouds from the moving freight, tracking a plurality of successive positions and orientations of the moving freight, correlating each successive point cloud with each successive position and orientation of the moving freight, combining the correlated point clouds to obtain a composite point cloud of the moving freight, and processing the composite point cloud to dimension the moving freight.
Turning now to the drawings,
In the illustrated example, the moving freight is dimensioned while in motion by a dimensioning system that includes a ranging system for capturing, as described below in connection with
As shown in the example embodiment of
In the illustrated example, each 3D camera 20 incorporates time-of-flight (TOF) technology in which the sensor is a two-dimensional array of sensors or pixels, such as a charge coupled device (CCD) or a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) device, together with an active modulated light source, such as a solid-state laser or a light emitting diode (LED) operating in the near-infrared range, e.g., between 700 nm and 1000 nm. The light source illuminates the freight 12 with outgoing illumination light, and the reflected return light is captured. The phase shift between the outgoing and the return light is measured and translated into range values indicative of distances (depth) between the 3D camera 20 and the freight 12. In addition to or in lieu of the 3D cameras 20 having TOF technology, other 3D technologies, such as stereo vision and structured-light may also be employed. In some embodiments, a bank of two-dimensional cameras replaces a single 3D camera. In some examples, the 3D cameras 20 are not all identical, but are of different types, and are arranged in any combination.
In the illustrated example, the server 16 sequentially operates each 3D camera 20 to capture a plurality or set or collection of incremental point clouds 62A-62H (see
The server 16 combines each of these incremental point clouds 62A-62H together to dimension the freight 12. Known systems may use overlaps between successive point clouds to align the successive point clouds by executing an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. However, this is a computationally intensive and time-consuming task that requires not only a large amount of redundant information to be captured and processed, but also a generous overlap between successive point clouds, which might not be available, especially if sensors having narrow fields of view are employed in the 3D cameras 20. The unconstrained movement of the freight 12 further complicates this task, because such overlaps might often not be available, and there may be no available or reliable alignment information among the successive point clouds. For example, the server 16 does not know whether the freight 12 has gone forward or back, or has stopped and started, or has turned right or left, or has changed direction, or has changed speed, or has changed its position and orientation during its travel.
To supply such alignment information, the example tracking system of
The example server 16 correlates each successive point cloud with each successive position and orientation of the moving freight 12, combines the correlated point clouds to obtain a composite point cloud of the moving freight 12, and processes the composite point cloud to dimension the moving freight 12. Advantageously, the tracking system assigns a time stamp to each successive position and orientation of the moving freight 12, and correlates each successive point cloud with each successive time-stamped position and orientation of the moving freight 12. More particularly, the cameras 28, 30 operate at a frame rate, e.g., 30-60 frames per second or Hertz, and the time associated with each frame corresponds to the time that each successive position and orientation is acquired by the cameras 28, 30.
More particularly, the server 16 estimates the dimensions of the moving freight 12 by executing one or more dimensioning algorithms, as schematically illustrated in
The data points from the background are separated from the data points from the freight 12, and removed to form, as shown in
Once the base plane or background has been detected, the data points of the base plane are removed from the combined point cloud 42. The remaining data points are then clustered, e.g., by Euclidean clustering (block 104). That is, a multitude of the data points are organized into groups that share a similarity, e.g., a distance or closeness to each other. With the data points clustered, the freight 12 is extracted and located (block 106).
The server 16 forms a minimum bounding box (see also
The bounding box is fitted to enclose the convex hull with a minimum volume (block 110). In the illustrated example, the bounding box has a rectangular parallelepiped or cuboid shape having three pairs of mutually orthogonal planar faces, and is fitted around the convex hull. As can be seen in
In the illustrated example, the freight 12 is weighed (block 58). Alternatively, the weighing is performed either prior to, or during, the dimensioning. In the illustrated example, the freight 12 is efficiently loaded into a container, typically for transport by land, rail, water, and air, etc. (block 60).
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the example methods and apparatus disclosed herein. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has,” “having,” “includes,” “including,” “contains,” “containing,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements, but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a,” “has . . . a,” “includes . . . a,” or “contains . . . a,” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, or contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially,” “essentially,” “approximately,” “about,” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1%, and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors, and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein, will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5408322 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7137207 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7248754 | Cato | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7373722 | Cooper et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7474389 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487595 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7605817 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647752 | Magnell | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8094937 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8199977 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8265895 | Willins et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8284988 | Sones et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479996 | Barkan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8542252 | Perez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8599303 | Stettner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8660338 | Ma et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8743176 | Stettner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757479 | Clark et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812226 | Zeng | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8989342 | Liesenfelt et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007601 | Steffey et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9070285 | Ramu | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9129277 | MacIntosh | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9329269 | Zeng | May 2016 | B2 |
9396554 | Williams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9400170 | Steffey | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9549125 | Goyal et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9562971 | Shenkar et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9600892 | Patel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9778388 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9791862 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9938092 | McMurrough | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010041948 | Ross et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020164236 | Fukuhara et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020158453 | Levine | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040240754 | Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050016004 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050114059 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060106742 | Bocchicchio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070074410 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272732 | Hindmon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080238919 | Pack | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090088975 | Sato et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103773 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026804 | Tanizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100091094 | Sekowski | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118116 | Tomasz | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131234 | Stewart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Stettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100295850 | Katz | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315412 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110047636 | Stachon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052043 | Hung | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110137527 | Simon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168774 | Magal | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172875 | Gibbs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110216063 | Hayes | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310088 | Adabala et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120075342 | Choubassi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120179621 | Moir et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185112 | Sung et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209553 | Doytchinov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236119 | Rhee | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249802 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250978 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287249 | Choo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130144565 | Miller | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156292 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162806 | Ding et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130228620 | Ahern et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130236089 | Litvak et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130299306 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130299313 | Baek, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321418 | Kirk | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341400 | Lancaster-Larocque | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002597 | Taguchi | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028837 | Gao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140049616 | Stellner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140098094 | Neumann | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140192050 | Qiu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140267614 | Ding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267688 | Aich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300637 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140351073 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150015602 | Beaudoin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150088618 | Basir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092066 | Geiss et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106403 | Haverinen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150154467 | Feng | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161793 | Takahashi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181198 | Baele et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150379704 | Chandrasekar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160044862 | Kocer | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061591 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070981 | Sasaki | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160012588 | Taguchi | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107690 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160150217 | Popov | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156898 | Ren et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160163067 | Williams | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170004649 | Collet Romea et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170041553 | Cao et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170150129 | Pangrazio | May 2017 | A1 |
20170227647 | Baik | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170228885 | Baumgartner | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170280125 | Brown | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180068266 | Kirmani | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180290845 | McMurrough | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2835830 | Nov 2012 | CA |
104200086 | Dec 2014 | CN |
2439487 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2562688 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2693362 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2003002935 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2008057504 | May 2008 | WO |
2008154611 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2013165674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014092552 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2015127503 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vasiljevic et al (NPL “High-Accuracy Vehicle Localization for autonomous warehousing”, reprint submitted to Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing May 9, 2016, p. 42.). |
“Fair Billing with Automatic Dimensioning” pp. 1-4, undated, Copyright Mettler-Toledo International Inc. |
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014. |
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated Jan. 25, 2010 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn. |
Brown et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/078,074, filed Mar. 23, 2016. |
Brown et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/008,710, filed Jan. 28, 2016. |
Lecking et al., “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features,” IEEE, pp. 333-337, Sep. 15, 2008. |
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8 ,Apr. 24, 2013. |
Fu et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/385,113, filed Dec. 20, 2016. |
Swope et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/015,228, filed Feb. 4, 2016. |
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2214-2221. |
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25. |
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013. |
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006. |
Gu et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/242,126, filed Aug. 19, 2016. |
Dubois, M., et al., “A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods,” European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), vol., no., pp. 88-93, Sep. 25-27, 2013. |
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada. |
Rusu, et al. “Spatial change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library, retrieved from Internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php]. |
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,” International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253. |
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. |
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. |
Puwein, J., et al., “Robust multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks,” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Jan. 2011. |
Datta, A., et al., “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Vorkshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009. |
Olson, Clark F., et al. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for Terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010. |
Rusu, et al., “How to incrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from the Internet on Aug. 22, 2016 from <http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php>. |
Zheng et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/131,856, filed Apr. 18, 2016. |
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, ISSN: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176-p. 178. |
Schnabel et al. “Efficient Ransac for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12. |
Buenaposada et al. “Real-time tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/057669 dated Jan. 3, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180143003 A1 | May 2018 | US |