The present invention relates to the field of devices for weighing and dimensioning packages, more specifically, to an integrated dimensioning and weighing system for packages.
Shipping companies typically charge customers for their services based on package size (i.e., volumetric weight) and/or weight (i.e., dead weight). When printing a shipping label for a package to be shipped, a customer enters both the size and weight of the package into a software application that bills the customer based on the information. Typically, customers get this information by hand-measuring package's dimensions (e.g., with a tape measure) and may weigh the package on a scale. In some cases, customers simply guess the weight of the package. Both guessing of the weight and hand-measurement of dimensions are prone to error, particularly when packages have irregular shape. When the shipping company determines, at a later time, that the package is larger and/or heavier than reported by the customer, an additional bill may be issued to the customer. Additional bills may reduce customer satisfaction, and, if the shipping customer is a retail company who has already passed along the shipping cost to an end customer, decrease the customer's earnings.
Furthermore, shipping companies may also collect the package's origin, destination, and linear dimensions from a customer to determine the correct charges for shipping a package. Manual entry of this information by a customer or the shipping company is also error prone.
As such, there is a commercial need for systems that accurately collect a package's size, weight, linear dimensions, origin, and destination and for integration with billing systems to reduce errors in transcribing that data.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the present invention embraces an object analysis system. The system includes a scale for measuring the weight of the object, a range camera configured to produce a range image of an area in which the object is located, and a computing device configured to determine the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on the range image.
In an exemplary embodiment, the range camera is configured to produce a visible image of the scale's measured weight of the object and the computing device is configured to determine the weight of the object based, at least in part, on the visible image. The scale may be an analog scale having a gauge and the visible image produced by the range camera includes the scale's gauge. Alternatively, the scale may be a digital scale having a display and the visible image produced by the range camera includes the scale's display.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the computing device is configured to execute shipment billing software.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the object analysis system transmits the weight of the object and determined dimensions to a host platform configured to execute shipment billing software.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the object analysis system includes a microphone for capturing audio from a user and the computing device is configured for converting the captured audio to text.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the range camera is configured to project a visible laser pattern onto the object and produce a visible image of the object and the computing device is configured to determine the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on the visible image of the object.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, the scale and the range camera are fixed in position and orientation relative to each other and the computing device is configured to determine the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on ground plane data of the area in which the object is located. The ground plane data may be generated by capturing an initial range image and identifying a planar region in the initial range image that corresponds to a ground plane.
In another aspect, the present invention embraces a method for determining the dimensions of an object that includes capturing a range image of a scene that includes the object and determining the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on the range image and ground plane data of the area in which the object is located.
In yet another aspect, the present invention embraces a terminal for measuring at least one dimension of an object that includes a range camera, a visible camera, a display that are fixed in position and orientation relative to each other. The range camera is configured to produce a range image of an area in which the object is located. The visible camera is configured to produce a visible image of an area in which the object is located. The display is configured to present information associated with the range camera's field of view and the visible camera's field of view.
In an exemplary embodiment, the range camera's field of view is narrower than the visible camera's field of view and the display is configured to present the visible image produced by the visible camera and an outlined shape on the displayed visible image corresponding to the range camera's field of view.
In another exemplary embodiment, the display is configured to present the visible image produced by the visible camera and a symbol on the displayed visible image corresponding to the optical center of the range camera's field of view.
In yet another aspect, the present invention embraces a method for determining the dimensions of an object that includes projecting a laser pattern (e.g., a visible laser pattern) onto the object, capturing an image of the projected pattern on the object, and determining the dimensions of the objection based, at least in part, on the captured image.
The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other exemplary objectives and/or advantages of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.
The present invention embraces a system that accurately collects a package's size, weight, linear dimensions, origin, and destination and that may be integrated with billing systems to reduce errors in transcribing that data.
In one aspect, the present invention embraces an object analysis system.
As noted, the scale 12 measures the weight of the object 112. Exemplary scales 12 include analog scales having gauges or and digital scales having displays. The scale 12 of
The scale 12 also includes top surface markings 14 to guide a user to place the object in a preferred orientation for analysis by the system. For example, a particular orientation may improve the range image and/or visible image produced by range camera 102. Additionally, the scale may include top surface markings 16 to facilitate the computing device's estimation of a reference plane during the process of determining the dimensions of the object 112.
In exemplary embodiments, the scale 12 transmits the measured weight of the object 112 to the computing device 104 and/or a host platform 17. In this regard, the scale 12 may transmit this information via a wireless connection and/or a wired connection (e.g., a USB connection, such as a USB 1.0, 2.0, and/or 3.0).
As noted, the object analysis system 11 includes a range camera 102 that is configured to produce a range image of an area 110 in which the object 112 is located. In exemplary embodiments, the range camera 102 is also configured to produce a visible image of the scale's measured weight of the object 112 (e.g., a visible image that includes window 13). The range camera 102 may be separate from the computing device 104, or the range camera 102 and the computing device 104 may be part of the same device. The range camera 102 is typically communicatively connected to the computing device 104.
The depicted object analysis system 11 includes a microphone 18. The microphone 18 may be separate from the range camera 102, or the microphone 18 and the range camera 102 may be part of the same device. Similarly, the microphone 18 may be separate from the computing device 104, or the microphone 18 and the computing device 104 may be part of the same device.
The microphone 18 captures audio from a user of the object analysis system 11, which may then be converted to text (e.g., ASCII text). In exemplary embodiments, the text may be presented to the user via a user-interface for validation or correction (e.g., by displaying the text on a monitor or by having a computerized reader speak the words back to the user). The text is typically used as an input for software (e.g., billing software and/or dimensioning software). For example, the text (i.e., as generated by converting audio from the user) may be an address, in which case the computing device may be configured to determine the components of the address. In this regard, exemplary object analysis systems reduce the need for error-prone manual entry of data.
Additionally, the text may be used as a command to direct software (e.g., billing software and/or dimensioning software). For example, if multiple objects are detected in the range camera's field of view, a user interface may indicate a numbering for each object and ask the user which package should be dimensioned. The user could then give a verbal command by saying a number, and the audio as captured by the microphone 18 can be converted into text which commands the dimensioning software. Similarly, the user could give verbal commands to describe the general class of the object (e.g., “measure a box”) or to indicate the type of information being provided (e.g., a command of “destination address” to indicate that an address will be provided next).
The computing device 104 may be configured for converting the audio captured by the microphone 18 to text. Additionally, the computing device 104 may be configured to transmit the captured audio (e.g., as a file or a live stream) to a speech-to-text module and receive the text. The captured audio may be transcoded as necessary by the computing device 104. The computing device 104 may or may not include the speech-to-text module. For example, the computing device 104 may transmit (e.g., via a network connection) the captured audio to an external speech-to-text service provider (e.g., Google's cloud-based speech-to-text service). In exemplary embodiments, the speech-to-text module transmits the text and a confidence measure of each converted phrase. The computing device 104 may be configured to enter the text into shipment billing software (e.g., by transmitting the text to a host platform 17 configured to execute shipment billing software).
As noted, the object analysis system 11 includes a computing device 104. The computing device 104 depicted in
The computing device 104 is configured to determine the dimensions of an object 112 based, at least in part, on a range image produced by range camera 102. Exemplary methods of determining the dimensions of an object 112 are discussed with respect to
The computing device 104 may be configured to calculate the density of the object 112 based on its determined dimensions and weight. Furthermore, the computing device 104 may be configured to compare the calculated density to a realistic density threshold (e.g., as preprogrammed data or tables). If the calculated density exceeds a given realistic density threshold, the computing device 104 may: re-determine the dimensions of the object 112 based on the range image; instruct the range camera 102 to produce a new range image; instruct the range camera 102 to produce a new visible image and/or instruct the scale 12 to re-measure the object 112.
The computing device 104 may also be configured to compare the determined dimensions of the object 112 with the dimensions of the scale 12. In this regard, the scale's dimensions may be known (e.g., as preprogrammed data or tables), and the computing device 104 may be configured to determine the dimensions of the object based on the range image and the known dimensions of the scale 12. Again, if the determined dimensions exceed a given threshold of comparison, the computing device 104 may: re-determine the dimensions of the object 112 based on the range image; instruct the range camera 102 to produce a new range image; instruct the range camera 102 to produce a new visible image and/or instruct the scale 12 to re-measure the object 112.
In exemplary embodiments, the computing device 104 may be configured to execute shipment billing software. In such embodiments, the computing device 104 may be a part of the same device as the host platform 17, or the object analysis system 11 may not include a host platform 17.
Alternatively, the object analysis system 11 may transmit (e.g., via a wireless connection and/or a wired connection, such as a USB connection) the weight of the object 112 and determined dimensions to a host platform 17 configured to execute shipment billing software. For example, the computing device 104 may transmit the weight of the object 112 and determined dimensions to the host platform 17.
In exemplary embodiments, the range camera 102 is configured to project a laser pattern (e.g., a visible laser pattern) onto the object 112 and produce a visible image of the object 112, and the computing device 104 is configured to determine the dimensions of the object 112 based, at least in part, on the visible image of the object 112. In this regard, the projection of the laser pattern on the object 112 provides additional information or an alternative or supplemental method for determining the dimensions of the object 112. Furthermore, the laser pattern will facilitate user-placement of the object with respect to the range camera.
An exemplary object analysis system 11 includes a scale 12 and a range camera 102 that are fixed in position and orientation relative to each other. The computing device 104 of such an exemplary object analysis system 11 may be configured to determine the dimensions of the object 112 based, at least in part, on ground plane data of the area 110 in which the object is located. The ground plane data may include data generated by capturing an initial range image and identifying a planar region in the initial range image that corresponds to a ground plane.
The ground plane data may be stored on the computing device 104 during manufacturing after calibrating the object analysis system 11. The ground plane data may also be updated by the computing device 104 after installation of the object analysis system 11 or periodically during use by capturing an initial range image and identifying a planar region in the initial range image that corresponds to a ground plane.
The computing device 104 may be configured to verify the validity of the ground plane data by identifying a planar region in the range image produced by the range camera 102 that corresponds to a ground plane. If the ground plane data does not correspond to the identified planar region in the range image, the computing device 104 may update the ground plane data.
In exemplary embodiments, the computing device 104 may be configured to control the object analysis system in accordance with multiple modes. While in a detection mode, the computing device 104 may be configured to evaluate image viability and/or quality (e.g., of an infra-red image or visible image) in response to movement or the placement of an object in the range camera's field of view. Based on the evaluation of the image viability and/or quality, the computing device 104 may be configured to place the object analysis system in another mode, such as an image capture mode for capturing an image using the range camera 102 or an adjust mode for adjusting the position of the range camera 102.
In exemplary embodiments, the object analysis system may include positioning devices, (e.g., servo motors, tilt motors, and/or three-axis accelerometers) to change the position of the range camera relative to the object. In this regard, the computing device 104 may be configured to control and receive signals from the positioning devices. After evaluating image viability and/or quality, the computing device may place the object analysis system in an adjust mode. The computing device may be configured to have two adjust modes, semiautomatic and automatic. In semiautomatic adjust mode, the computing device may be configured to provide visual or audio feedback to an operator that then moves the range camera (e.g., adjusts the camera's tilt angle and/or height). In automatic mode, the computing device may be configured to control and receive signals from the positioning devices to adjust the position of the range camera. By adjusting the position of the range camera, the object analysis system can achieve higher dimensioning accuracy.
In another aspect, the present invention embraces a method for determining the dimensions of an object. The method includes capturing an image of a scene that includes the object and determining the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on the range image and ground plane data of the area in which the object is located. As noted with respect to an exemplary object analysis system, the ground plane data may include data generated by capturing an initial range image and identifying a planar region in the initial range image that corresponds to a ground plane. The method may also include verifying the validity of the ground plane data by identifying a planar region in the range image that corresponds to a ground plane.
This exemplary method for determining the dimensions of an object is typically used in conjunction with a range camera on a fixed mount at a given distance and orientation with respect to the area in which the object is placed for dimensioning. In this regard, utilizing the ground plane data, rather than identifying the ground plane for each implementation of the method, can reduce the time and resources required to determine the dimensions of the object.
In yet another aspect, the present invention embraces another method for determining the dimensions of an object. The method includes projecting a laser pattern (e.g., a visible laser pattern) onto an object, capturing an image of the projected pattern on the object, and determining the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on the captured image. In an exemplary embodiment, the object has a rectangular box shape.
An exemplary method includes projecting a laser pattern (e.g., a grid or a set of lines) onto a rectangular box. Typically, the box is positioned such that two non-parallel faces are visible to the system or device projecting the laser pattern and a camera system with known field of view characteristics. The camera system is used to capture an image of the laser light reflecting off of the box. Using image analysis techniques (e.g., imaging software), the edges of the box are determined. The relative size and orientation of the faces is determined by comparing the distance between lines of the laser pattern in the captured image to the known distance between the lines of the laser pattern as projected while considering the characteristics of the camera system's field of view, such as size, aspect ratio, distortion, and/or angular magnification.
The distance from the camera system to the box may also be desired and may be used to determine the dimensions of the box. The distance between the camera system and the box can be determined using a variety of methods. For example, the distance from the camera system to the box may be determined from the laser pattern and the camera system's field of view. Additionally, sonar ranging techniques or considering the light time of flight may facilitate determination of this distance.
Another exemplary method includes projecting a laser pattern including two horizontal, parallel lines and two vertical, parallel lines. The distance between each set of parallel lines is constant. In this regard, the laser pattern is collimated, producing a constant-size square or rectangle in the center of the laser pattern as it propagates away from the device that generated the laser pattern.
An exemplary laser pattern including two horizontal, parallel lines and two vertical, parallel lines is depicted in
The exemplary method typically includes projecting the laser pattern onto two faces of a standard rectilinear box-shaped object such that the two horizontal laser lines are parallel to and on opposite side of the edge connecting the two faces (i.e., one horizontal laser line above the edge and the other horizontal line below the edge). Additionally, the laser pattern is typically projected such that the laser pattern fully traverses the visible faces of the object.
The exemplary method includes capturing an image of the projected laser pattern on the object (e.g., with a camera system). The dimensions of the object are then determined, at least in part, from the captured image. For example, a processor may be used to process the image to identify the break points in the projected laser pattern. Using the known relationship between the laser pattern and the field of view, the break points may be translated into coordinates in a three-dimensional space. Typically, any two break points which are connected by a laser line segment can be used to calculate a dimension of the object.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes determining the coordinates of the break points in a three-dimensional space based on the known size of the central rectangle (e.g., a square). In other words, the known size of the rectangle is used as a ruler or measuring stick in the image to determine the dimensions of the object.
Exemplary methods include projecting a laser pattern including laser lines having a profile with a small divergence angle. In other words, the width of the laser lines increases as the distance from the device projecting the pattern increases. The divergence angle is typically between about 1 and 30 milliradians (e.g., between about 2 and 20 milliradians). In an exemplary embodiment, the divergence angle is between about 3 and 10 milliradians (e.g., about 6 milliradians).
In exemplary embodiments, the laser lines' divergence angle corresponds to the divergence of a small number of pixels (e.g., between about 2 and 10 pixels) within the camera system used to capture an image. Thus, as the field of view of this small number of pixels expands with increasing distance from the camera system, the width of the laser lines increases at a similar rate. Accordingly, the width of the laser lines covers approximately the same number of pixels, although not necessarily the same set of pixels, regardless of the projected laser pattern's distance from the camera system.
In another exemplary embodiment, the laser pattern includes laser lines having a profile with a divergence angle such that the width of the laser line in the far field corresponds to the field of view of a small number of pixels in the far field. In this regard, the divergence angle of the laser lines does not necessarily match the field of view of the small number of pixels in the near field.
Exemplary methods utilizing a laser pattern that includes laser lines having a profile with a small divergence angle prevents the loss of resolution in the far field. When projected laser lines are conventionally collimated, the laser lines appear increasingly thinner on a target object as the distance between the laser projection module and the target object increases. If the reflected light from a projected laser line falls on an area of the camera system's sensor that is approximately one pixel wide or smaller, the precision of the dimensioning method can be no greater than one pixel. In contrast, when projected laser lines have a profile with a small divergence angle, the projected line has an energy distribution encompassing multiple pixels facilitating a more precise determination of the center of the projected line. Accordingly, methods employing projected laser lines having a profile with a small divergence angle facilitate measurements that exceed the resolution of the camera pixel sampling.
In yet another aspect, the present invention embraces a terminal for measuring at least one dimension of an object. The terminal includes a range camera, a visible camera (e.g., a grayscale and/or RGB sensor), and a display that are fixed in position and orientation relative to each other. The range camera is configured to produce a range image of an area in which an object is located, and the visible camera is configured to produce a visible image of an area in which the object is located. The display is configured to present information associated with the range camera's field of view and the visible camera's field of view.
Typically, the range camera's field of view is narrower than the visible camera's field of view. To facilitate accurate dimensioning, the display is configured to present the visible image produced by the visible camera and an outlined shape on the displayed visible image corresponding to the range camera's field of view (e.g., a rectangle). The outlined shape shows the user of the terminal when the object to be dimensioned is within the range camera's field of view. In other words, the interior of the outlined shape typically corresponds to the intersection or overlap between the visible image and the range image.
In exemplary embodiments, the display is configured to present information associated with the optimal orientation of the range camera and visible camera with respect to the object. Such information further facilitates accurate dimensioning by encouraging the user to adjust the orientation of the terminal to an orientation that accelerates or improves the dimensioning process.
The display may be configured to present the visible image produced by the visible camera and a symbol on the displayed visible image corresponding to the optical center of the range camera's field of view. Again, presenting such a symbol on the display facilitates accurate dimensioning by encouraging the user to adjust the orientation of the terminal to an orientation that accelerates or improves the dimensioning process.
In exemplary embodiments, the symbol shown by the display is a crosshair target having three prongs. When the object is a rectangular box, the display may be configured to show the three prongs of the crosshairs on the displayed visible image in an orientation that corresponds to the optimal orientation of the range camera and visible camera with respect to a corner of the rectangular box.
When the object to be dimensioned is cylindrically shaped (e.g., having a medial axis and base), the display may be configured to show the visible image produced by the visible camera and a line on the displayed visible image in an orientation that corresponds to the optimal orientation of the range camera and visible camera with respect to the medial axis of the object. The display may also be configured to show the visible image produced by the visible camera and an ellipse on the displayed visible image in an orientation that corresponds to the optimal orientation of the range camera and visible camera with respect to the base of the object.
As noted, the configuration of the terminal's display presents information associated with the range camera's field of view and the visible camera's field of view. The information helps the user determine the three degrees of freedom and/or the three degrees of freedom for translation of the camera relative to the object that will ensure or at least facilitate an accurate measurement of the object.
In exemplary embodiments, the terminal may include a processor that is configured to automatically initiate a dimensioning method when the orientation of the terminal with respect to an object corresponds to an orientation that accelerates or improves the dimensioning process. Automatically initiating the dimensioning method in this manner prevents any undesirable motion of the terminal that may be induced when an operator presses a button or other input device on the terminal. Additionally, automatically initiating the dimensioning method typically improves the accuracy of the dimensioning method.
As noted, the terminal's display may be configured to present information associated with the optimal orientation of the range camera and visible camera with respect to the object. The terminal's processor may be configured to analyze the output of the display (i.e., the visible image and the information associated with the optimal orientation) and initiate the dimensioning method (e.g., including capturing a range image) when the orientation information and the visible image align. The terminal's processor may be configured to analyze the output of the display using imaged-based edge detection methods (e.g., a Canny edge detector).
For example, if the orientation information presented by the display is a crosshair target having three prongs, the processor may be configured to analyze the output of the display using edge detection methods and, when the combined edge strengths of the three prongs and three of the object's edges (i.e., at a corner) exceed a threshold, the processor automatically initiates a dimensioning method. In other words, when the three prongs align with the object's edges, the processor automatically initiates a dimensioning method. Typically, the edge detection methods are only applied in the central part of the display's output image (i.e., near the displayed orientation information) to reduce the amount of computation.
In exemplary embodiments, the display is configured to present information associated with the optimal distance of the terminal from the object. Such information further facilitates accurate dimensioning by encouraging the user to position the terminal at a distance from the object that accelerates or improves the dimensioning process. For example, the range camera of the terminal typically has a shorter depth of view than does the visible camera.
Additionally, when objects are very close to the terminal the range camera typically does not work as accurately, but the visible camera functions normally. Thus, when viewing the visible image produced by the visible camera on the display, objects outside of the range camera's optimal range (i.e., either too close or too far from the terminal to accurately determine the object's dimensions) appear normal.
Accordingly, the display may be configured to present the visible image produced by the visible camera modified such that portions of the visible image corresponding to portions of the range image with high values (e.g., distances beyond the range camera's optimal range) are degraded (e.g., a percentage of the pixels corresponding to the range image's high values are converted to a different color, such as white or grey). The amount of degradation (e.g., the percentage of pixels converted) typically corresponds to the range image's value beyond the upper end of the range camera's optimal range. In other words, the amount of degradation occurs such that the clarity of objects in the displayed visible image corresponds to the range camera's ability to determine the object's dimensions. The amount of degradation may begin at a certain low level corresponding to a threshold distance from the terminal, increase linearly up to a maximum distance after which the degradation is such that the visible image is no longer displayed (e.g., only grey or white is depicted).
Similarly, the display may be configured to present the visible image produced by the visible camera modified such that portions of the visible image corresponding to portions of the range image with low values (e.g., distances less than the range camera's optimal range) are degraded (e.g., a percentage of the pixels corresponding to the range image's high values are converted to a different color, such as black or grey). The amount of degradation (e.g., the percentage of pixels converted) may correspond to the range image's value under the lower end of the range camera's optimal range. Typically, the degradation is complete (i.e., only black or grey) if the range image's value is less than the lower end of the range camera's optimal range. Additional aspects of an exemplary terminal and dimensioning method are described herein with respect to
An exemplary method of determining the dimensions of an object using a range camera is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/278,559 filed at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Oct. 21, 2011 and titled “Determining Dimensions Associated with an Object,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In this regard, devices, methods, and systems for determining dimensions associated with an object are described herein. For example, one or more embodiments include a range camera configured to produce a range image of an area in which the object is located, and a computing device configured to determine the dimensions of the object based, at least in part, on the range image.
One or more embodiments of the present disclosure can increase the automation involved in determining the dimensions associated with (e.g., of) an object (e.g., a box or package to be shipped by a shipping company). For example, one or more embodiments of the present disclosure may not involve an employee of the shipping company physically contacting the object during measurement (e.g., may not involve the employee manually measuring the object and/or manually entering the measurements into a computing system) to determine its dimensions. Accordingly, one or more embodiments of the present disclosure can decrease and/or eliminate the involvement of an employee of the shipping company in determining the dimensions of the object. This can, for example, increase the productivity of the employee, decrease the amount of time involved in determining the object's dimensions, reduce and/or eliminate errors in determining the object's dimensions (e.g., increase the accuracy of the determined dimensions), and/or enable a customer to check in and/or pay for a package's shipping at an automated station (e.g., without the help of an employee), among other benefits.
In the following description, reference is made to
As will be appreciated, elements shown in the various embodiments herein can be added, exchanged, combined, and/or eliminated so as to provide a number of additional embodiments of the present disclosure. The proportion and the relative scale of the elements provided in
As shown in
As shown in
Memory 108 can be volatile or nonvolatile memory. Memory 108 can also be removable (e.g., portable) memory, or non-removable (e.g., internal) memory. For example, memory 108 can be random access memory (RAM) (e.g., dynamic random access memory (DRAM) and/or phase change random access memory (PCRA)), read-only memory (ROM) (e.g., electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) and/or compact-disc read-only memory (CD-ROM)), flash memory, a laser disc, a digital versatile disc (DVO) or other optical disk storage, and/or a magnetic medium such as magnetic cassettes, tapes, or disks, among other types of memory.
Further, although memory 108 is illustrated as being located in computing device 104, embodiments of the present disclosure are not so limited. For example, memory 108 can also be located internal to another computing resource (e.g., enabling computer readable instructions to be downloaded over the Internet or another wired or wireless connection).
In some embodiments, range camera 102 can be part of a handheld and/or portable device, such as a barcode scanner. In some embodiments, range camera 102 can be mounted on a tripod.
Range camera 102 can produce (e.g., capture, acquire, and/or generate) a range image of an area (e.g., scene). Range camera 102 can produce the range image of the area using, for example, structured near-infrared (near-IR) illumination, among other techniques for producing range images.
The range image can be a two-dimensional image that shows the distance to different points in the area from a specific point (e.g., from the range camera). The distance can be conveyed in real-world units (e.g., metric units such as meters or millimeters), or the distance can be an integer value (e.g., 11-bit) that can be converted to real-world units. The range image can be a two-dimensional matrix with one channel that can hold integers or floating point values. For instance, the range image can be visualized as different black and white shadings (e.g., different intensities, brightnesses, and/or darknesses) and/or different colors in any color space (e.g., RGB or HSV) that correspond to different distances between the range camera and different points in the area.
For example, range camera 102 can produce a range image of an area (e.g., area 110 illustrated in
Range camera 102 can be located a distance d from object 112 when range camera 102 produces the range image, as illustrated in
The range image produced by range camera 102 can be visualized as black and white shadings corresponding to different distances between range camera 102 and different portions of object 112. For example, the darkness of the shading can increase as the distance between range camera 102 and the different portions of object 112 decreases (e.g., the closer a portion of object 112 is to range camera 102, the darker the portion will appear in the range image). Additionally and/or alternatively, the range image can be visualized as different colors corresponding to the different distances between range camera 102 and the different portions of object 112. Computing device 104 can determine the dimensions (e.g., the length, width, height, diameter, etc.) of object 112 based, at least in part, on the range image produced by range camera 102. For instance, processor 106 can execute executable instructions stored in memory 108 to determine the dimensions of object 112 based, at least in part, on the range image.
For example, computing device 104 can identify a number of planar regions in the range image produced by range camera 102. The identified planar regions may include planar regions that correspond to object 112 (e.g., to surfaces of object 112). That is, computing device 104 can identify planar regions in the range image that correspond to object 112. For instance, in embodiments in which object 112 is a rectangular shaped box (e.g., the embodiment illustrated in
Once the planar regions that correspond to object 112 have been identified, computing device 104 can determine the dimensions of object 112 based, at least in part, on the identified planar regions (e.g., on the dimensions of the identified planar regions). For example, computing device 104 can determine the dimensions of the planar regions that correspond to object 112. For instance, computing device 104 can determine the dimensions of the planar regions that correspond to object 112 based, at least in part, on the distances of the planar regions within the range image. Computing device 104 can then determine the dimensions of object 112 based, at least in part, on the dimensions of the planar regions.
Computing device 104 can identify the planar regions in the range image that correspond to object 112 by, for example, determining (e.g., calculating) coordinates (e.g., real-world x, y, z coordinates in millimeters) for each point (e.g., each row, column, and depth tuple) in the range image. Intrinsic calibration parameters associated with range camera 102 can be used to convert each point in the range image into the real-world coordinates. The system can undistort the range image using, for example, the distortion coefficients for the camera to correct for radial, tangential, and/or other types of lens distortion. In some embodiments, the two-dimensional matrix of the real-world coordinates may be downsized by a factor between 0.25 and 0.5.
Computing device 104 can then build a number of planar regions through the determined real-world coordinates. For example, a number of planar regions can be built near the points, wherein the planar regions may include planes of best fit to the points. Computing device 104 can retain the planar regions that are within a particular (e.g., pre-defined) size and/or a particular portion of the range image. The planar regions that are not within the particular size or the particular portion of the range image can be disregarded.
Computing device 104 can then upsample each of the planar regions (e.g., the mask of each of the planar regions) that are within the particular size and/or the particular portion of the range image to fit in an image of the original (e.g., full) dimensions of the range image. Computing device 104 can then refine the planar regions to include only points that lie within an upper bound from the planar regions.
Computing device 104 can then fit a polygon to each of the planar regions that are within the particular size and/or the particular portion of the range image, and retain the planar regions whose fitted polygon has four vertices and is convex. These retained planar regions are the planar regions that correspond to object 112 (e.g., to surfaces of object 112). The planar regions whose fitted polygon does not have four vertices and/or is not convex can be disregarded. Computing device 104 can also disregard the planar regions in the range image that correspond to the ground plane and background clutter of area 110.
Computing device 104 can disregard (e.g., ignore) edge regions in the range image that correspond to the edges of area 110 while identifying the planar regions in the range image that correspond to object 112. For example, computing device 104 can run a three dimensional edge detector on the range image before identifying planar regions in the range image, and can then disregard the detected edge regions while identifying the planar regions. The edge detection can also identify non-uniform regions that can be disregarded while identifying the planar regions.
Once the planar regions that correspond to object 112 have been identified, computing device 104 can determine the dimensions of object 112 based, at least in part, on the identified planar regions (e.g., on the dimensions of the identified planar regions). For example, computing device 104 can determine the dimensions of object 112 by arranging the identified planar regions (e.g., the planar regions whose fitted polygon has four vertices and is convex) into a shape corresponding to the shape of object 112, and determining a measure of centrality (e.g., an average) for the dimensions of clustered edges of the arranged shape. The dimensions of the edges of the arranged shape correspond to the dimensions of object 112.
Once the arranged shape (e.g., the bounding volume of the object) is constructed, computing device 104 can perform (e.g., run) a number of quality checks. For example, in embodiments in which object 112 is a rectangular shaped box, computing device 104 can determine whether the identified planar regions fit together into a rectangular arrangement that approximates a true rectangular box within (e.g., below) a particular error threshold.
In some embodiments, computing device 104 can include a user interface (not shown in
In some embodiments, computing device 104 can determine the volume of object 112 based, at least in part, on the determined dimensions of object 112. Computing device 104 can provide the determined volume to a user of computing device 104 via the user interface.
At block 222, method 220 includes capturing a range image of a scene that includes the object. The range image can be, for example, analogous to the range image previously described in connection with
At block 224, method 220 includes determining the dimensions (e.g., the length, width, height, diameter, etc.) associated with the object based, at least in part, on the range image. For example, the dimensions associated with (e.g., of) the object can be determined in a manner analogous to that previously described in connection with
As an additional example, determining the dimensions associated with the object can include determining the dimensions of the smallest volume rectangular box large enough to contain the object based, at least in part, on the range image. The dimensions of the smallest volume rectangular box large enough to contain the object can be determined by, for example, determining and disregarding (e.g., masking out) the portion (e.g., part) of the range image containing information (e.g., data) associated with (e.g., from) the ground plane of the scene that includes the object, determining (e.g., finding) the height of a plane that is parallel to the ground plane and above which the object does not extend, projecting additional (e.g., other) portions of the range image on the ground plane, and determining (e.g., estimating) a bounding rectangle of the projected portions of the range image on the ground plane.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same techniques can be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure of exemplary methods of determining the dimensions of an object is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments of the disclosure.
An exemplary method of determining the dimensions of an object and an exemplary terminal for dimensioning objects are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/471,973 filed at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on May 15, 2012 and titled “Terminals and Methods for Dimensioning Objects,” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In one embodiment, a terminal in accordance with aspects of the present invention may include at least one or more imaging subsystems such as one or more camera modules and an actuator to adjust the pointing angle of the one or more camera modules to provide true stereo imaging. The terminal may be operable to attempt to determine at least one of a height, a width, and a depth based on effecting the adjustment of the pointing angle of the one or more camera modules.
For example, a terminal in accordance with aspects of the present invention may include at least one or more imaging subsystems such as camera modules and an actuator based on wires of nickel-titanium shape memory alloy (SMA) and an associated control and heating ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) to adjust the pointing angle of the one or more camera modules to provide true stereo imaging. Using true stereo imaging, the distance to the package can be determined by measuring the amount of drive current or voltage drop across the SMA actuator. The terminal may be operable to attempt to determine at least one of a height, a width, a depth, based on the actuator effecting the adjustment of the pointing angle of the one or more camera modules, the measured distance, and the obtained image of the object.
With reference still to
Initially, at block 602 as shown in
With reference again to
For example, the terminal may include a suitable software program employing a subtraction routine to determine when the image of the object in the second image data is aligned with the object in the first image data. The closer the aligned images of the object are, the resulting subtraction of the two images such as subtracting the amplitude of the corresponding pixels of the imagers will become smaller as the images align and match. The entire images of the object may be compared, or a portion of the images of the object may be compared. Thus, the better the images of the object are aligned, the smaller the subtracted difference will be.
A shown in
With reference again to
For example, the relationship between an angle Θ of the optical axis of the movable imaging subsystem relative to the terminal, a distance A from the fixed imaging subsystem to the object, and a distance C between the fixed imaging subsystem and the movable imaging subsystem may be expressed as follows:
tan Θ=A/C.
The relationship between angle Θ of the optical axis of the movable imaging subsystem relative to the terminal, a distance B from the fixed imaging subsystem to the object, and distance C between the fixed imaging subsystem and the movable imaging subsystem may be expressed as follows:
cos Θ=C/B.
With reference to
where h is a dimension of the object (such as height) of the object on the image sensor array, f is focal length of the imaging optics lens, H is a dimension of the actual object (such as height), and D is distance from the object to the imaging optic lens.
With reference to measuring, for example a height dimension, knowing the vertical size of the imaging sensor (e.g., the height in millimeters or inches) and number of pixels vertically disposed along the imaging sensor, the height of the image of the object occupying a portion of the imaging sensor would be related to a ratio of the number of pixels forming the imaged object to the total pixels disposed vertically along the image sensor.
For example, a height of an observed image on the imaging sensor may be determined as follows:
In one embodiment, an actual height measurement may be determined as follows:
For example, where an observed image of the object is 100 pixels high, and a distance D is 5 feet, the actual object height would be greater than when the observed image of the object is 100 pixels high, and a distance D is 2 feet. Other actual dimensions (e.g., width and depth) of the object may be similarly obtained.
From the present description, it will be appreciated that the terminal may be setup using a suitable setup routine that is accessed by a user or by a manufacturer for coordinating the predetermined actual object to dimensioning at various distances, e.g., coordinate a voltage or current reading required to effect the actuator to align the object in the second image with the image of the object in the first image, to create a lookup table. Alternatively, suitable programming or algorithms employing, for example, the relationships described above, may be employed to determine actual dimensions based on the number of pixels observed on the imaging sensor. In addition, suitable edge detection or shape identifier algorithms or processing may be employed with analyzing standard objects, e.g., boxes, cylindrical tubes, triangular packages, etc., to determine and/or confirm determined dimensional measurements.
In this exemplary embodiment, an imaging subsystem 3900 may include a first fixed imaging subsystem 3210, and a second movable imaging subsystem 3220. In addition, terminal 1000 (
From the present description of the various imaging subsystems and actuators, it will be appreciated that the second aligned image be performed in an operable time after the first image so that the effect of the user holding and moving the terminal when obtaining the images or the object moving when obtaining the image does not result in errors in determining the one or more dimensions of the object. It is desirable minimize the time delay between the first image and the second aligned image. For example, it may be suitable that the images be obtained within about 0.5 second or less, or possibly within about ⅛ second or less, about 1/16 second or less, or about 1/32 second or less.
With reference to
As shown in
In addition, the terminal may include a motion sensor 1300 (
The imaging optics assembly may employ a fixed focus imaging optics assembly. For example, the optics may be focused at a hyperfocal distance so that objects in the images from some near distance to infinity will be sharp. The imaging optics assembly may be focused at a distance of 15 inches or greater, in the range of 3 or 4 feet distance, or at other distances. Alternatively, the imaging optics assembly may comprise an autofocus lens. The exemplary terminal may include a suitable shape memory alloy actuator apparatus for controlling an imaging subassembly such as a microcamera disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,974,025 by Topliss, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
From the present description, it will be appreciated that the exemplary terminal may be operably employed to separately obtain images and dimensions of the various sides of an object, e.g., two or more of a front elevational view, a side elevational view, and a top view, may be separately obtained by a user similar to measuring an object as one would with a ruler.
The exemplary terminal may include a suitable autofocusing microcamera such as a microcamera disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2011/0279916 by Brown et al., the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In addition, it will be appreciated that the described imaging subsystems in the embodiments shown in
With reference to
A signal 7002 may be a trigger signal which can be made active by actuation of trigger 1220 (
A signal 7102 illustrates illumination subsystem 800 (
A signal 7202 is an exposure control signal illustrating active states defining exposure periods and inactive states intermediate the exposure periods for an image sensor of a terminal. For example, in an active state, an image sensor array of terminal 1000 (
A signal 7302 is a readout control signal illustrating the exposed pixels in the image sensor array being transferred to memory or secondary storage in the imager so that the imager may be operable to being ready for the next active portion of the exposure control signal. In the timing diagram of
With reference again to
In one example, image sensor integrated circuit 1040 can be provided e.g., by an MT9V022 (752×480 pixel array) or an MT9V023 (752×480 pixel array) image sensor integrated circuit available from Aptina Imaging (formerly Micron Technology, Inc.). In one example, image sensor array 1033 can be a hybrid monochrome and color image sensor array having a first subset of monochrome pixels without color filter elements and a second subset of color pixels having color sensitive filter elements. In one example, image sensor integrated circuit 1040 can incorporate a Bayer pattern filter, so that defined at the image sensor array 1033 are red pixels at red pixel positions, green pixels at green pixel positions, and blue pixels at blue pixel positions. Frames that are provided utilizing such an image sensor array incorporating a Bayer pattern can include red pixel values at red pixel positions, green pixel values at green pixel positions, and blue pixel values at blue pixel positions. In an embodiment incorporating a Bayer pattern image sensor array, processor 1060 prior to subjecting a frame to further processing can interpolate pixel values at frame pixel positions intermediate of green pixel positions utilizing green pixel values for development of a monochrome frame of image data. Alternatively, processor 1060 prior to subjecting a frame for further processing can interpolate pixel values intermediate of red pixel positions utilizing red pixel values for development of a monochrome frame of image data. Processor 1060 can alternatively, prior to subjecting a frame for further processing interpolate pixel values intermediate of blue pixel positions utilizing blue pixel values. An imaging subsystem of terminal 1000 can include image sensor 1032 and lens assembly 200 for focusing an image onto image sensor array 1033 of image sensor 1032.
In the course of operation of terminal 1000, image signals can be read out of image sensor 1032, converted, and stored into a system memory such as RAM 1080. Memory 1085 of terminal 1000 can include RAM 1080, a nonvolatile memory such as EPROM 1082 and a storage memory device 1084 such as may be provided by a flash memory or a hard drive memory. In one embodiment, terminal 1000 can include processor 1060 which can be adapted to read out image data stored in memory 1080 and subject such image data to various image processing algorithms. Terminal 1000 can include a direct memory access unit (DMA) 1070 for routing image information read out from image sensor 1032 that has been subject to conversion to RAM 1080. In another embodiment, terminal 1000 can employ a system bus providing for bus arbitration mechanism (e.g., a PCI bus) thus eliminating the need for a central DMA controller. A skilled artisan would appreciate that other embodiments of the system bus architecture and/or direct memory access components providing for efficient data transfer between the image sensor 1032 and RAM 1080 are within the scope and the spirit of the present invention.
Reference still to
Terminal 1000 may include illumination subsystem 800 for illumination of target, and projection of an illumination pattern (not shown). Illumination subsystem 800 may emit light having a random polarization. The illumination pattern, in the embodiment shown can be projected to be proximate to but larger than an area defined by field of view 20, but can also be projected in an area smaller than an area defined by a field of view 20. Illumination subsystem 800 can include a light source bank 500, comprising one or more light sources. Light source assembly 800 may further include one or more light source banks, each comprising one or more light sources, for example. Such light sources can illustratively include light emitting diodes (LEDs), in an illustrative embodiment. LEDs with any of a wide variety of wavelengths and filters or combination of wavelengths or filters may be used in various embodiments. Other types of light sources may also be used in other embodiments. The light sources may illustratively be mounted to a printed circuit board. This may be the same printed circuit board on which an image sensor integrated circuit 1040 having an image sensor array 1033 may illustratively be mounted.
Terminal 1000 can also include an aiming subsystem 600 for projecting an aiming pattern (not shown). Aiming subsystem 600 which can comprise a light source bank can be coupled to aiming light source bank power input unit 1208 for providing electrical power to a light source bank of aiming subsystem 600. Power input unit 1208 can be coupled to system bus 1500 via interface 1108 for communication with processor 1060.
In one embodiment, illumination subsystem 800 may include, in addition to light source bank 500, an illumination lens assembly 300, as is shown in the embodiment of
In another aspect, terminal 1000 can include a power supply 1402 that supplies power to a power grid 1404 to which electrical components of terminal 1000 can be connected. Power supply 1402 can be coupled to various power sources, e.g., a battery 1406, a serial interface 1408 (e.g., USB, RS232), and/or AC/DC transformer 1410.
Further, regarding power input unit 1206, power input unit 1206 can include a charging capacitor that is continually charged by power supply 1402. Power input unit 1206 can be configured to output energy within a range of energization levels. An average energization level of illumination subsystem 800 during exposure periods with the first illumination and exposure control configuration active can be higher than an average energization level of illumination and exposure control configuration active.
Terminal 1000 can also include a number of peripheral devices including trigger 1220 which may be used to make active a trigger signal for activating frame readout and/or certain decoding processes. Terminal 1000 can be adapted so that activation of trigger 1220 activates a trigger signal and initiates a decode attempt. Specifically, terminal 1000 can be operative so that in response to activation of a trigger signal, a succession of frames can be captured by way of read out of image information from image sensor array 1033 (typically in the form of analog signals) and then storage of the image information after conversion into memory 1080 (which can buffer one or more of the succession of frames at a given time). Processor 1060 can be operative to subject one or more of the succession of frames to a decode attempt.
For attempting to decode a barcode symbol, e.g., a one dimensional barcode symbol, processor 1060 can process image data of a frame corresponding to a line of pixel positions (e.g., a row, a column, or a diagonal set of pixel positions) to determine a spatial pattern of dark and light cells and can convert each light and dark cell pattern determined into a character or character string via table lookup. Where a decodable indicia representation is a 2D barcode symbology, a decode attempt can comprise the steps of locating a finder pattern using a feature detection algorithm, locating matrix lines intersecting the finder pattern according to a predetermined relationship with the finder pattern, determining a pattern of dark and light cells along the matrix lines, and converting each light pattern into a character or character string via table lookup.
Terminal 1000 can include various interface circuits for coupling various peripheral devices to system address/data bus (system bus) 1500, for communication with processor 1060 also coupled to system bus 1500. Terminal 1000 can include an interface circuit 1028 for coupling image sensor timing and control circuit 1038 to system bus 1500, an interface circuit 1102 for coupling electrical power input unit 1202 to system bus 1500, an interface circuit 1106 for coupling illumination light source bank power input unit 1206 to system bus 1500, and an interface circuit 1120 for coupling trigger 1220 to system bus 1500. Terminal 1000 can also include display 1222 coupled to system bus 1500 and in communication with processor 1060, via an interface 1122, as well as pointer mechanism 1224 in communication with processor 1060 via an interface 1124 connected to system bus 1500. Terminal 1000 can also include keyboard 1226 coupled to systems bus 1500 and in communication with processor 1060 via an interface 1126. Terminal 1000 can also include range detector unit 1210 coupled to system bus 1500 via interface 1110. In one embodiment, range detector unit 1210 can be an acoustic range detector unit. Various interface circuits of terminal 1000 can share circuit components. For example, a common microcontroller can be established for providing control inputs to both image sensor timing and control circuit 1038 and to power input unit 1206. A common microcontroller providing control inputs to circuit 1038 and to power input unit 1206 can be provided to coordinate timing between image sensor array controls and illumination subsystem controls.
A succession of frames of image data that can be captured and subject to the described processing can be full frames (including pixel values corresponding to each pixel of image sensor array 1033 or a maximum number of pixels read out from image sensor array 1033 during operation of terminal 1000). A succession of frames of image data that can be captured and subject to the described processing can also be “windowed frames” comprising pixel values corresponding to less than a full frame of pixels of image sensor array 1033. A succession of frames of image data that can be captured and subject to the above described processing can also comprise a combination of full frames and windowed frames. A full frame can be read out for capture by selectively addressing pixels of image sensor 1032 having image sensor array 1033 corresponding to the full frame. A windowed frame can be read out for capture by selectively addressing pixels or ranges of pixels of image sensor 1032 having image sensor array 1033 corresponding to the windowed frame. In one embodiment, a number of pixels subject to addressing and read out determine a picture size of a frame. Accordingly, a full frame can be regarded as having a first relatively larger picture size and a windowed frame can be regarded as having a relatively smaller picture size relative to a picture size of a full frame. A picture size of a windowed frame can vary depending on the number of pixels subject to addressing and readout for capture of a windowed frame.
Terminal 1000 can capture frames of image data at a rate known as a frame rate. A typical frame rate is 60 frames per second (FPS) which translates to a frame time (frame period) of 16.6 ms. Another typical frame rate is 30 frames per second (FPS) which translates to a frame time (frame period) of 33.3 ms per frame. A frame rate of terminal 1000 can be increased (and frame time decreased) by decreasing of a frame picture size.
In numerous cases herein wherein systems and apparatuses and methods are described as having a certain number of elements, it will be understood that such systems, apparatuses and methods can be practiced with fewer than the mentioned certain number of elements. Also, while a number of particular embodiments have been described, it will be understood that features and aspects that have been described with reference to each particular embodiment can be used with each remaining particularly described embodiment.
Another exemplary method of determining the dimensions of an object utilizes one or more of the foregoing methods to improve the accuracy of the method. In particular, the method includes capturing a range image of the object and capturing a visible image of the object (e.g., using a range camera with both an infra-red sensor and an RGB or monochrome camera). The range image and visible image are then aligned based on the relative positions from which the two images were captured.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes performing a first method of determining the object's dimensions based on either the range image or the visible image. The method then includes performing a second method of determining the object's dimensions based on the other image (i.e., not the image used in the first method). The results of the first and second methods are then compared. If the compared results are not within a suitable threshold, new images may be captured or the first and second methods may be performed again using the original images.
In another exemplary embodiment, the method includes simultaneously performing a first method of determining the object's dimensions based on the range image and a second method of determining the object's dimensions based on the visible image. When one of the methods determines one of the object's dimensions, the determined dimension is provided to the other method, and the other method adjusts its process for determining the object's dimensions. For example, the other method may assume the determined dimension to be correct or the other method may verify the determined dimension in view of the image it is using to determine the object's dimensions. In other words, the method performs both dimensioning methods simultaneously and dynamically. Such dynamic sharing of information between dimensioning methods facilitates the efficient determination of reliable dimensions of the object.
As would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art upon consideration of the present disclosure, the foregoing method may be implemented by an appropriately configured computing device (e.g., including a processor and memory).
The foregoing disclosure has presented a number of systems, methods, and devices for determining the dimensions of an object. Although methods have been disclosed with respect to particular systems and/or devices, the methods may be performed using different systems and/or devices than those particularly disclosed. Similarly, the systems and devices may perform different methods than those methods specifically disclosed with respect to a given system or device. Furthermore, the systems and devices may perform multiple methods for determining the dimensions of an object (e.g., to increase accuracy). Aspects of each of the methods for determining the dimensions of an object may be used in or combined with other methods. Finally, components (e.g., a range camera, camera system, scale, and/or computing device) of a given disclosed system or device may be incorporated into other disclosed systems or devices to provide increased functionality.
To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/784,933 for an “Integrated Dimensioning and Weighing System” filed Mar. 5, 2013 at the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
In the specification and/or figures, typical embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such exemplary embodiments. The use of the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
This application hereby claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/714,394 for an “Integrated Dimensioning and Weighing System” (filed Oct. 16, 2012 at the United States Patent and Trademark Office), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3971065 | Bayer | Jul 1976 | A |
4279328 | Ahlbom | Jul 1981 | A |
4398811 | Nishioka et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4495559 | Gelatt, Jr. | Jan 1985 | A |
4730190 | Win et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4803639 | Steele et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5184733 | Amarson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5220536 | Stringer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5331118 | Jensen | Jul 1994 | A |
5359185 | Hanson | Oct 1994 | A |
5384901 | Glassner et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5548707 | LoNegro | Aug 1996 | A |
5555090 | Schmutz | Sep 1996 | A |
5561526 | Huber et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5590060 | Granville et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5606534 | Stringer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619245 | Kessler et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5655095 | LoNegro et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661561 | Wurz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5699161 | Woodworth | Dec 1997 | A |
5729750 | Ishida | Mar 1998 | A |
5730252 | Herbinet | Mar 1998 | A |
5732147 | Tao | Mar 1998 | A |
5734476 | Dlugos | Mar 1998 | A |
5737074 | Haga et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5767962 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5831737 | Stringer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850370 | Stringer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850490 | Johnson | Dec 1998 | A |
5869827 | Rando | Feb 1999 | A |
5870220 | Migdal et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5900611 | Hecht | May 1999 | A |
5923428 | Woodworth | Jul 1999 | A |
5929856 | LoNegro et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5938710 | Lanza et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959568 | Woolley | Sep 1999 | A |
5960098 | Tao | Sep 1999 | A |
5969823 | Wurz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978512 | Kim et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5979760 | Freyman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991041 | Woodworth | Nov 1999 | A |
6009189 | Schaack | Dec 1999 | A |
6025847 | Marks | Feb 2000 | A |
6049386 | Stringer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053409 | Brobst et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067110 | Nonaka et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069696 | McQueen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6137577 | Woodworth | Oct 2000 | A |
6177999 | Wurz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189223 | Haug | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6232597 | Kley | May 2001 | B1 |
6236403 | Chaki | May 2001 | B1 |
6246468 | Dimsdale | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6333749 | Reinhardt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336587 | He et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6369401 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373579 | Ober et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6429803 | Kumar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6457642 | Good et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507406 | Yagi et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517004 | Good et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6519550 | D'Hooge et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6674904 | McQueen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6705526 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6781621 | Gobush | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6824058 | Patel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6832725 | Gardiner et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6858857 | Pease et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6922632 | Foxlin | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6971580 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7057632 | Yamawaki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085409 | Sawhney et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086162 | Tyroler | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104453 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7128266 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7137556 | Bonner et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7159783 | Walczyk et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7161688 | Bonner et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7205529 | Andersen et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214954 | Schopp | May 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7307653 | Dutta | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310431 | Gokturk | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7413127 | Ehrhart et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7586049 | Wurz | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602404 | Reinhardt et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7639722 | Paxton et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780084 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788883 | Buckley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7974025 | Topliss | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8027096 | Feng et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028501 | Buckley et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050461 | Shpunt et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055061 | Katano | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072581 | Breiholz | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8102395 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149224 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8194097 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8212889 | Chanas et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8228510 | Pangrazio et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230367 | Bell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8294969 | Plesko | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305458 | Hara | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8310656 | Zalewski | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313380 | Zalewski et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8317105 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8322622 | Liu | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8339462 | Stec et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350959 | Topliss et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8351670 | Ijiri et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366005 | Kotlarsky et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8371507 | Haggerty et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8376233 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381976 | Mohideen et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381979 | Franz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390909 | Plesko | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408464 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408468 | Van Horn et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8408469 | Good | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8424768 | Rueblinger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8437539 | Komatsu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8441749 | Brown et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448863 | Xian et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8457013 | Essinger et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8459557 | Havens et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8469272 | Kearney | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8474712 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8479992 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490877 | Kearney | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517271 | Kotlarsky et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523076 | Good | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8528818 | Ehrhart et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8544737 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8548420 | Grunow et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550335 | Samek et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550354 | Gannon et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550357 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556174 | Kosecki et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556176 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8556177 | Hussey et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8559767 | Barber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561895 | Gomez et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561903 | Sauerwein | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8561905 | Edmonds et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565107 | Pease et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570343 | Halstead | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571307 | Li et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576390 | Nunnink | Nov 2013 | B1 |
8579200 | Samek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8583924 | Caballero et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8584945 | Wang et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587595 | Wang | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587697 | Hussey et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8588869 | Sauerwein et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8590789 | Nahill et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8596539 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596542 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8596543 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599271 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8599957 | Peake et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600158 | Li et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8600167 | Showering | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8602309 | Longacre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608053 | Meier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8608071 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611309 | Wang et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615487 | Gomez et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8621123 | Caballero | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8622303 | Meier et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628013 | Ding | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628015 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628016 | Winegar | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629926 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630491 | Longacre et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635309 | Berthiaume et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636200 | Kearney | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636212 | Nahill et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636215 | Ding et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636224 | Wang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8638806 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640958 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8640960 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8643717 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646692 | Meier et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8646694 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8657200 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659397 | Vargo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8668149 | Good | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678285 | Kearney | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8678286 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682077 | Longacre | Mar 2014 | B1 |
D702237 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
8687282 | Feng et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8692927 | Pease et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8695880 | Bremer et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698949 | Grunow et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8702000 | Barber et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8717494 | Gannon | May 2014 | B2 |
8720783 | Biss et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723804 | Fletcher et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723904 | Marty et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727223 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8792688 | Unsworth | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8810779 | Hilde | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8897596 | Passmore et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9014441 | Truyen et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9082195 | Holeva et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9142035 | Rotman | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9233470 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9299013 | Curlander et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9424749 | Reed et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9486921 | Straszheim et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
20010027995 | Patel et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032879 | He et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020054289 | Thibault et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067855 | Chiu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109835 | Goetz | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118874 | Chung et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020158873 | Williamson | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167677 | Okada et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179708 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196534 | Lizotte et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038179 | Tsikos et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053513 | Vatan et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063086 | Baumberg | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030091227 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030156756 | Gokturk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030197138 | Pease et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225712 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235331 | Kawaike et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008259 | Gokturk et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019274 | Galloway et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024754 | Mane et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066329 | Zeitfuss et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073359 | Ichijo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083025 | Yamanouchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089482 | Ramsden et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098146 | Katae et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105580 | Hager et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118928 | Patel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122779 | Stickler | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155975 | Hart et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165090 | Ning | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184041 | Schopp | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211836 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214623 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233461 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258353 | Gluckstad et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006477 | Patel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050117215 | Lange | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050128196 | Popescu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050168488 | Montague | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211782 | Martin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264867 | Cho et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060047704 | Gopalakrishnan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078226 | Zhou | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108266 | Bowers et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112023 | Horhann | May 2006 | A1 |
20060151604 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159307 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159344 | Shao et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060232681 | Okada | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255150 | Longacre | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269165 | Viswanathan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291719 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003154 | Sun et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025612 | Iwasaki et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031064 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063048 | Havens et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070116357 | Dewaele | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127022 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143082 | Degnan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153293 | Gruhlke et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070171220 | Kriveshko | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070177011 | Lewin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070181685 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237356 | Dwinell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291031 | Konev et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299338 | Stevick et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013793 | Hillis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035390 | Wurz | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056536 | Hildreth et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080062164 | Bassi et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077265 | Boyden | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079955 | Storm | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080164074 | Wurz | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185432 | Caballero et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204476 | Montague | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212168 | Olmstead et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247635 | Davis et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273191 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080273210 | Hilde | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080278790 | Boesser et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090059004 | Bochicchio | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090095047 | Patel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134221 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090195790 | Zhu | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225333 | Bendall et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237411 | Gossweiler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090268023 | Hsieh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272724 | Gubler | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090273770 | Bauhahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090313948 | Buckley et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090318815 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323084 | Dunn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100035637 | Varanasi et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060604 | Zwart et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091104 | Sprigle | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113153 | Yen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118200 | Gelman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128109 | Banks | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161170 | Siris | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171740 | Andersen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100172567 | Prokoski | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177076 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177080 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177707 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177749 | Essinger et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202702 | Benos et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Stettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211355 | Horst et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217678 | Goncalves | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220849 | Colbert et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100220894 | Ackley et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223276 | Al-Shameri et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245850 | Lee | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100254611 | Arnz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100303336 | Abraham | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315413 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321482 | Cleveland | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110019155 | Daniel et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040192 | Brenner et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043609 | Choi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110099474 | Grossman et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110169999 | Grunow et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188054 | Petronius et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110188741 | Sones | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202554 | Powilleit et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234389 | Mellin | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235854 | Berger et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249864 | Venkatesan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279916 | Brown et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286628 | Goncalves et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288818 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301994 | Tieman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110303748 | Lemma et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310227 | Konertz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120024952 | Chen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120056982 | Katz et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057345 | Kuchibhotla | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120067955 | Rowe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074227 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081714 | Pangrazio et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120111946 | Golant | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113223 | Hilliges et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113250 | Farlotti et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120126000 | Kunzig et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120138685 | Qu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120140300 | Freeman | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168511 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120168512 | Kotlarsky et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179665 | Baarman et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185094 | Rosenstein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190386 | Anderson | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193407 | Barten | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120193423 | Samek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197464 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203647 | Smith | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218436 | Rodriguez et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120223141 | Good et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120224026 | Bayer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120228382 | Havens et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120236288 | Stanley | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120242852 | Hayward et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120248188 | Kearney | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256901 | Bendall | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120262558 | Boger et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280908 | Rhoads et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120282905 | Owen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120282911 | Davis et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284012 | Rodriguez et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284122 | Brandis | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284339 | Rodriguez | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284593 | Rodriguez | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293610 | Doepke et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120294549 | Doepke | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299961 | Ramkumar et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300991 | Free | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313848 | Galor et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314030 | Datta | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120314058 | Bendall et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316820 | Nakazato et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130019278 | Sun et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038881 | Pesach et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130038941 | Pesach et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130043312 | Van Horn | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050426 | Sarmast et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056285 | Meagher | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070322 | Fritz et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130075168 | Amundsen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082104 | Kearney et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094069 | Lee et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101158 | Lloyd et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130156267 | Muraoka et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130175341 | Kearney et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130175343 | Good | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130200150 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130200158 | Feng et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201288 | Billerbeck et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130208164 | Cazier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211790 | Loveland et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130214048 | Wilz | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130223673 | Davis et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130256418 | Havens et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257744 | Daghigh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130257759 | Daghigh | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270346 | Xian et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130278425 | Cunningham et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287258 | Kearney | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130291998 | Konnerth | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292474 | Xian et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292475 | Kotlarsky et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130292477 | Hennick et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293539 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130293540 | Laffargue et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306728 | Thuries et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306730 | Brady et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306731 | Pedraro | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306734 | Xian et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307964 | Bremer et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308013 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308625 | Park et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313324 | Koziol et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313325 | Wilz et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313326 | Ehrhart | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130327834 | Hennick et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329012 | Bartos | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341399 | Xian et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342343 | Harring et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342717 | Havens et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140001267 | Giordano et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002828 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008430 | Soule et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140008439 | Wang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009586 | NcNamer et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021256 | Qu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021259 | Moed et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025584 | Liu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140027518 | Edmonds et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031665 | Pinto et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140034723 | Van Horn et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140034731 | Gao et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140034734 | Sauerwein | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140036848 | Pease et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140039693 | Havens et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042814 | Kather et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049120 | Kohtz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049635 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058612 | Wong et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140061305 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140061306 | Wu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140061307 | Wang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140062709 | Hyer et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140063289 | Hussey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140066136 | Sauerwein et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067104 | Osterhout | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140067692 | Ye et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140070005 | Nahill et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071430 | Hansen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071840 | Venancio | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074746 | Wang | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075846 | Woodburn | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140076974 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078341 | Havens et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078342 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078345 | Showering | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140084068 | Gillet et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140086348 | Peake et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140091147 | Evans et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140097238 | Ghazizadeh | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140097249 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098091 | Hori | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098284 | Oberpriller et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098792 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100774 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140103115 | Meier et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104414 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104416 | Giordano et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104451 | Todeschini et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104664 | Lee | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106594 | Skvoretz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140106725 | Sauerwein | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108010 | Maltseff et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108402 | Gomez et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140108682 | Caballero | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140110485 | Toa et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114530 | Fitch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140124577 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124579 | Ding | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125842 | Winegar | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125853 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125999 | Longacre et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140129378 | Richardson | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131438 | Kearney | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131441 | Nahill et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131445 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133379 | Wang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135984 | Hirata | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139654 | Takahashi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140585 | Wang | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151453 | Meier et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140152975 | Ko | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140158468 | Adami | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140160329 | Ren et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168380 | Heidemann et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192187 | Atwell et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192551 | Masaki | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140205150 | Ogawa | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140225918 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225985 | Klusza et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240454 | Hirata et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140247279 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140247280 | Nicholas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267609 | Laffargue | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268093 | Tohme et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140270361 | Amma et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140306833 | Ricci | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307855 | Withagen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313527 | Askan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319219 | Liu et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140320408 | Zagorsek et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140347553 | Ovsiannikov et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350710 | Gopalkrishnan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140379613 | Nishitani et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150009100 | Haneda et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009301 | Ribnick et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009338 | Laffargue et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036876 | Marrion et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150049347 | Laffargue et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150062369 | Gehring et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150063676 | Lloyd et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150116498 | Vartiainen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150149946 | Benos et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150163474 | You | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150201181 | Moore et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150204662 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150213647 | Laffargue et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150229838 | Hakim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150269403 | Lei et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150276379 | Ni et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150308816 | Laffargue et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150325036 | Lee | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355470 | Herschbach | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160048725 | Holz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160063429 | Varley et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090283 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160090284 | Svensson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160138247 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138248 | Conway et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160138249 | Svensson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160169665 | Deschenes et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187186 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160187210 | Coleman et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191801 | Sivan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160202478 | Masson et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170115490 | Hsieh et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20107018294 | Hardy et al. | Jun 2017 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004212587 | Apr 2005 | AU |
201139117 | Oct 2008 | CN |
3335760 | Apr 1985 | DE |
10210813 | Oct 2003 | DE |
102007037282 | Mar 2008 | DE |
1111435 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1443312 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2286932 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2381421 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2533009 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2722656 | Apr 2014 | EP |
2779027 | Sep 2014 | EP |
2833323 | Feb 2015 | EP |
2843590 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2845170 | Mar 2015 | EP |
2966595 | Jan 2016 | EP |
3006893 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3012601 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3007096 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2503978 | Jan 2014 | GB |
2525053 | Oct 2015 | GB |
2531928 | May 2016 | GB |
H04129902 | Apr 1992 | JP |
200696457 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007084162 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008210276 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2014210646 | Nov 2014 | JP |
2015174705 | Oct 2015 | JP |
20100020115 | Feb 2010 | KR |
20110013200 | Feb 2011 | KR |
20110117020 | Oct 2011 | KR |
20120028109 | Mar 2012 | KR |
9640452 | Dec 1996 | WO |
0077726 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0114836 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2006095110 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2007015059 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2011017241 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2012175731 | Dec 2012 | WO |
2013021157 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013033442 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013163789 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013166368 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2013173985 | Nov 2013 | WO |
20130184340 | Dec 2013 | WO |
2014019130 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014102341 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014149702 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2014151746 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015006865 | Jan 2015 | WO |
2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2016061699 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Peter Clarke, Actuator Developer Claims Anti-Shake Breakthrough for Smartphone Cams, Electronic Engineering Times, p. 24, May 16, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/055,234, not yet published, Hand Held Products, Inc. filed Oct. 16, 2013; 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,179, Serge Thuries et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,249, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,233, Franck Laffargue et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. 34 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,211, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/519,195, Franck Laffargue et al., filed Oct. 21, 2014, not published yet. 35 pages. |
European Search Report for application No. EP13186043 (now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)): Total pp. 7. |
European Patent Office Action for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, Dated Jul. 16, 2014, 5 pages. |
European Patent Search Report for Application No. 14157971.4-1906, Dated Jun. 30, 2014, 6 pages. |
Caulier, Yannick et al., “A New Type of Color-Coded Light Structures for an Adapted and Rapid Determination of Point Correspondences for 3D Reconstruction.” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 8082 808232-3; 2011; 8 pages. |
Kazantsev, Aleksei et al. “Robust Pseudo-Random Coded Colored STructured Light Techniques for 3D Object Model Recovery”; ROSE 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments (Oct. 17-18, 2008) , 6 pages. |
Mouaddib E. et al. “Recent Progress in Structured Light in order to Solve the Correspondence Problem in Stereo Vision” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 1997; 7 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2013/039438 (WO2013166368), Oct. 1, 2013, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,262, not yet published, filed Jun. 7, 2013, Hand Held Products Inc., Method of Error Correction for 3D Imaging Device: 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/453,019, not yet published, filed Aug. 6, 2014, Hand Held Products Inc., Dimensioning System With Guided Alignment: 31 pages. |
European Office Action for application EP 13186043, dated Jun. 12, 2014(now EP2722656 (Apr. 23, 2014)), Total of 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/461,524, not yet published, filed Aug. 18, 2014, Hand Held Products Inc., System and Method for Package Dimensioning: 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/274,858 for Mobile Printer With Optional Battery Accessory, filed May 12, 2014, (Marty et al.), 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/264,173 for Autofocus Lens System for Indicia Readers filed Apr. 29, 2014, (Ackley et al.), 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,322 for Focus Module and Components with Actuator filed Mar. 31, 2014 (Feng et al.); 92 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/222,994 for Method and Apparatus for Reading Optical Indicia Using a Plurality of Data filed Mar. 24, 2014 (Smith et al.); 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/231,898 for Hand-Mounted Indicia-Reading Device with Finger Motion Triggering filed Apr. 1, 2014 (Van Horn et al.); 36 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/486,759 for an Imaging Terminal, filed Apr. 2, 2014 (Oberpriller et al.); 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/436,337 for an Electronic Device, filed Nov. 5, 2012 (Fitch et al.); 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/458,405 for an Electronic Device, filed Jun. 19, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,620 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,681 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (Chaney et al.); 14 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,785 for a Scanner and Charging Base, filed Jul. 3, 2013 (Fitch et al.); 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/459,823 for a Scanner, filed Jul. 3, 2013 (Zhou et al.); 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/468,118 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Sep. 26, 2013 (Oberpriller et al.); 44 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/367,978, filed Feb. 7, 2012, (Feng et al.); now abandoned. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/736,139 for an Electronic Device Enclosure, filed Jan. 8, 2013 (Chaney); 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/771,508 for an Optical Redirection Adapter, filed Feb. 20, 2013 (Anderson); 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/780,356 for a Mobile Device Having Object Identification Interface, filed Feb. 28, 2013 (Samek et al.); 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/852,097 for a System and Method for Capturing and Preserving Vehicle Event Data, filed Mar. 28, 2013 (Barker et al.); 20 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,110 for a System and Method for Display of Information Using a Vehicle-Mount Computer, filed May 24, 2013 (Hollifield); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,144, for a System and Method for Display of Information Using a Vehicle-Mount Computer, filed May 24, 2013 (Chamberlin); 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/902,242 for a System for Providing a Continuous Communication Link With a Symbol Reading Device, filed May 24, 2013 (Smith et al.); 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,262 for a Method of Error Correction for 3D Imaging Device, filed Jun. 7, 2013 (Jovanovski et al.); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/912,702 for a System and Method for Reading Code Symbols at Long Range Using Source Power Control, filed Jun. 7, 2013 (Xian et al.); 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/922,339 for a System and Method for Reading Code Symbols Using a Variable Field of View, filed Jun. 20, 2013 (Xian et al.); 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,398 for a Code Symbol Reading System Having Adaptive Autofocus, filed Jun. 26, 2013 (Todeschini); 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/930,913 for a Mobile Device Having an Improved User Interface for Reading Code Symbols, filed Jun. 28, 2013 (Gelay et al.); 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/933,415 for an Electronic Device Case, filed Jul. 2, 2013 (London et al.); 47 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/947,296 for a System and Method for Selectively Reading Code Symbols, filed Jul. 22, 2013 (Rueblinger et al.); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,544 for a Code Symbol Reading System Having Adjustable Object Detection, filed Jul. 25, 2013 (Jiang); 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/961,408 for a Method for Manufacturing Laser Scanners, filed Aug. 7, 2013 (Saber et al.); 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/018,729 for a Method for Operating a Laser Scanner, filed Sep. 5, 2013 (Feng et al.); 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/019,616 for a Device Having Light Source to Reduce Surface Pathogens, filed Sep. 6, 2013 (Todeschini); 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,762 for a Handheld Indicia Reader Having Locking Endcap, filed Sep. 11, 2013 (Gannon); 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/035,474 for Augmented-Reality Signature Capture, filed Sep. 24, 2013 (Todeschini); 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/047,896 for Terminal Having Illumination and Exposure Control filed Oct. 7, 2013 (Jovanovski et al.); 32 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,175 for Imaging Apparatus Having Imaging Assembly, filed Oct. 14, 2013 (Barber); 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/055,234 for Dimensioning System, filed Oct. 16, 2013 (Fletcher); 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,314 for Indicia Reader, filed Oct. 14, 2013 (Huck); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,768 for Hybrid System and Method for Reading Indicia, filed Oct. 29, 2013 (Meier et al.); 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,746 for Self-Checkout Shopping System, filed Nov. 8, 2013 (Hejl et al.); 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/074,787 for Method and System for Configuring Mobile Devices via NFC Technology, filed Nov. 8, 2013 (Smith et al.); 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/087,190 for Optimal Range Indicators for Bar Code Validation, filed Nov. 22, 2013 (Hejl); 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/345,735 for Optical Indicia Reading Terminal with Combined Illumination filed Mar. 19, 2014 (Ouyang); 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,965 for High Dynamic-Range Indicia Reading System, filed Dec. 10, 2013 (Xian); 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/118,400 for Indicia Decoding Device with Security Lock, filed Nov. 18, 2013 (Liu); 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/150,393 for Incicia-reader Having Unitary Construction Scanner, filed Jan. 8, 2014 (Colavito et al.); 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,207 for Laser Barcode Scanner, filed Jan. 14, 2014 (Hou et al.); 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/154,915 for Laser Scanning Module Employing a Laser Scanning Assembly having Elastomeric Wheel Hinges, filed Jan. 14, 2014 (Havens et al.); 24 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/158,126 for Methods and Apparatus to Change a Feature Set on Data Collection Devices, filed Jan. 17, 2014 (Berthiaume et al.); 53 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,551 for Terminal Having Image Data Format Conversion filed Mar. 4, 2014 (Lui et al.); 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/342,544 for Imaging Based Barcode Scanner Engine with Multiple Elements Supported on a Common Printed Circuit Board filed Mar. 4, 2014 (Liu et al.); 27 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/257,174 for Reading Apparatus Having Partial Frame Operating Mode filed Apr. 21, 2014, (Barber et al.), 67 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/200,405 for Indicia Reader for Size-Limited Applications filed Mar. 7, 2014 (Feng et al.); 42 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/166,103 for Indicia Reading Terminal Including Optical Filter filed Jan. 28, 2014 (Lu et al.); 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/490,989, not yet published, filed Sep. 19, 2014, Intermec IP Corporation, Volume Dimensioning System Calibration Systems and Methods. |
Wikipedia, YUV description and definition, downloaded from http://www.wikipeida.org/wiki/YUV on Jun. 29, 2012, 10 pages. |
YUV Pixel Format, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/yuv.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 13 pages. |
YUV to RGB Conversion, downloaded from http://www.fource.org/fccyvrgb.php on Jun. 29, 2012; 5 pages. |
Benos et al., “Semi-Automatic Dimensioning with Imager of a Portable Device,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/149,912, filed Feb. 4, 2009 (now expired), 56 pages. |
Dimensional Weight—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensional—weight, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 2 pages. |
Dimensioning—Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimensioning, download date Aug. 1, 2008, 1 page. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/795,332, Frankc Laffargue et al., filed Jul. 9, 2015, not published yet, Systems and Methods for Enhancing Dimensioning; 55 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,023, Tyler Doornenbal et al., filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Adjusting Dimensioning Results Using Augmented Reality, 39 pages. |
Reisner-Kollmann,Irene; Anton L. Fuhrmann, Werner Purgathofer, Interactive Reconstruction of Industrial Sites Using Parametric Models, May 2010, Proceedings of the 26th Spring Conference of Computer Graphics SCCG ″10, 8 pages. |
Office Action in counterpart European Application No. 13186043.9 dated Sep. 30, 2015, pp. 1-7 [All references previously cited.]. |
European Search Report for related Application EP 15190249.1, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 7 pages. |
Great Britain Search Report for related Application on. GB1517843.7, Dated Feb. 23, 2016; 8 pages. |
European Search Report in related EP Application No. 15190315.0, Dated Apr. 1, 2016, 7 pages [Commonly owned Reference 2014/0104416 has previously cited]. |
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 2015220810562.2, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references]. |
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810685.6, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages, no references. |
European Search Report for related EP Application No. 15188440.0, Dated Mar. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Search Report and Opinion in Related EP Application 15176943.7, Dated Jan. 8, 2016, 8 pages, (US Application 2014/0049635 has been previously cited). |
Search Report and Opinion in related GB Application No. 1517112.7, Dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 Pages (GB2503978 is a commonly owned now abandoned application and not cited above). |
Lloyd, Ryan and Scott McCloskey, “Recognition of 3D Package Shapes for Singe Camera Metrology” IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of computer Visiona, IEEE, Mar. 24, 2014, pp. 99-106, {retrieved on Jun. 16, 2014}, Authors are employees of common Applicant. |
European Search Report for Related EP Application No. 15189214.8, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 9 pages. |
James Chamberlin, “System and Method for Picking Validation”, U.S Appl. No. 14/865,797, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published. |
McCloskey et al., “Image Transformation for Indicia Reading,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/982,032, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 48 pages, not yet published. |
United Kingdom Search Report in related application GB1517842.9, dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Second Chinese Office Action in related CN Application No. 201520810313.3, Dated Mar. 22, 2016, 5 pages. English Translation provided [No references]. |
European extended Search report in related EP Application 13785171.3, dated Sep. 19, 2016, 8 pages. |
El-Hakim et al., “Multicamera vision-based approach to flexible feature measurement for inspection and reverse engineering”, published in Optical Engineering, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, vol. 32, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1993, 15 pages. |
El-Hakim et al., “A Knowledge-based Edge/Object Measurement Technique”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sabry—E1-Hakim/publication/44075058—A—Knowledge—Based—EdgeObject—Measurement—Technique/links/00b4953b5faa7d3304000000.pdf [retrieved on Jul. 15, 2016] dated Jan. 1, 1993, 9 pages. |
European Extended search report in related EP Application No. 15190306.9, Dated Sep. 9, 2016, 15 pages [only new references are cited; remaining references were cited with partial search report in same application dated May 6, 2016]. |
Collings et al., “The Applications and Technology of Phase-Only Liquid Crystal on Silicon Devices”, Journal of Display Technology, IEEE Service Center, New, York, NY, US, vol. 7, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2011 (Mar. 1, 2011), pp. 112-119. |
European Search Report from related EP Application No. 16168216.6, Dated Oct. 20, 2016, 8 pages [New reference cited above; U.S. Publication 2014/0104413 has been previously cited]. |
European Extended Search Report in Related EP Application No. 16172995.9, Dated Aug. 22, 2016, 11 pages (Only new references have been cited; U.S. Pat. No. 8,463,079 (formerly U.S. Publication 2010/0220894) and U.S. Publication 2001/0027955 have been previously cited.). |
M.Zahid Gurbuz, Selim Akyokus, Ibrahim Emiroglu, Aysun Guran, An Efficient Algorithm for 3D Rectangular Box Packing, 2009, Applied Automatic Systems: Proceedings of Selected AAS 2009 Papers, pp. 131-134 [Examiner cited art in related US matter with Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 11, 2016]. |
United Kingdom combined Search and Examination Report in related GB Application No. 1607394.2, Dated Oct. 19, 2016, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,757 , Eric Todeschini, filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Dimensioning and Imaging Items, 80 pages. |
Proesmans, Marc et al. “Active Acquisition of 3D Shape for Moving Objects” 0-7803-3258-X/96 1996 IEEE; 4 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,197, Serge Thuries et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Optical Pattern Projector; 33 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,490, Brian L. Jovanovski et al., filed Jun. 23, 2015, not published yet, Dual-Projector Three-Dimensional Scanner; 40 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/715,916, H. Sprague Ackley, filed May 19, 2015, not published yet, Evaluating Image Values; 54 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/793,149, H. Sprague Ackley, filed Jul. 7, 2015, not published yet, Mobile Dimensioner Apparatus for Use in Commerce; 57 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/740,373, H. Sprague Ackley et al., filed Jun. 16, 2015, not published yet, Calibrating a Volume Dimensioner; 63 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/801,023, Tyler Doomenbal et al., filed Jul. 16, 2015, not published yet, Adjusting Dimensioning Results Using Augmented Reality, 39 pages. |
Leotta, Matthew, Generic, Deformable Models for 3-D Vehicle Surveillance, May 2010, Doctoral Dissertation, Brown University, Providence RI, 248 pages. |
Ward, Benjamin, Interactive 3D Reconstruction from Video, Aug. 2012, Doctoral Thesis, Univesity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 157 pages. |
Hood, Frederick W.; William A. Hoff, Robert King, Evaluation of an Interactive Technique for Creating Site Models from Range Data, Apr. 27-May 1, 1997 Proceedings of the ANS 7th Topical Meeting on Robotics & Remote Systems, Augusta GA, 9 pages. |
Gupta, Alok; Range Image Segmentation for 3-D Objects Recognition, May 1988, Technical Reports (CIS), Paper 736, University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science, retrieved from Http://repository.upenn.edu/cis—reports/736, Accessed May 31, 2015, 157 pages. |
Reisner-Kollmann, Irene; Anton L. Fuhrmann, Werner Purgathofer, Interactive Reconstruction of Industrial Sites Using Parametric Models, May 2010, Proceedings of the 26th Spring Conference of Computer Graphics SCCG ″10, 8 pages. |
Drummond, Tom; Roberto Cipolla, Real-Time Visual Tracking of Complex Structures, Jul. 2002, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 24, No. 7; 15 pages. |
Zhang, Zhaoxiang; Tieniu Tan, Kaiqi Huang, Yunhong Wang; Three-Dimensional Deformable-Model-based Localization and Recognition of Road Vehicles; IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 21, No. 1, Jan. 2012, 13 pages. |
Leotta, Matthew J.; Joseph L. Mundy; Predicting High Resolution Image Edges with a Generic, Adaptive, 3-D Vehicle Model; IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009; 8 pages. |
Spiller, Jonathan; Object Localization Using Deformable Templates, Master's Dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007; 74 pages. |
EP Search and Written Opinion Report in related matter EP Application No. 14181437.6, Dated Mar. 26, 2015, 7 pages. |
Hetzel, Gunter et al.; “3D Object Recognition from Range Images using Local Feature Histograms,”, Proceedings 2001 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001. Kauai, Hawaii, Dec. 8-14, 2001; pp. 394-399, XP010584149, ISBN: 978-0-7695-1272-3. |
Intention to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Apr. 14, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
Decision to Grant in counterpart European Application No. 14157971.4 dated Aug. 6, 2015, pp. 1-2. |
Salvi, Joaquim et al. “Pattern Codification Strategies in Structured Light Systems” published in Pattern Recognition; The Journal of the Pattern Recognition Society, Received Mar. 6, 2003; Accepted Oct. 2, 2003; 23 pages. |
Office Action in counterpart European Application No. 13186043.9 dated Sep. 30, 2015, pp. 1-7. |
Lloyd et al., “System for Monitoring the Condition of Packages Throughout Transit”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,575, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 59 pages, not yet published. |
James Chamberlin, “System and Method for Picking Validation”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,797, filed Sep. 25, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published. |
Jovanovski et al., “Image-Stitching for Dimensioning”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/870,488, filed Sep. 30, 2015, 45 pages, not yet published. |
Todeschini et al.; “Depth Sensor Based Auto-Focus System for an Indicia Scanner,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/872,176, filed Oct. 1, 2015, 44 pages, not yet published. |
Wikipedia, “3D projection” Downloaded on Nov. 25, 2015 from www.wikipedia.com, 4 pages. |
McCloskey et al., “Methods for Improving the Accuracy of Dimensioning-System Measurements,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/873,613, filed Sep. 2, 2015, 47 pages, not yet published. |
Search Report in counterpart European Application No. 15182675.7, Dated Dec. 4, 2015, 10 pages. |
McCloskey et al., “Image Transformation for Indicia Reading,” U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,032, filed Oct. 30, 2015, 48 pages, not yet published. |
Great Britain Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application GB1517842.9, Dated Apr. 8, 2016, 8 pages [References previously cited]. |
European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16173429.8, dated Dec. 1, 2016, 8 pages [Only new references cited: US 2013/0038881 was previously cited]. |
Extended European Search Report in related EP Application No. 16175410.0, dated Dec. 13, 2016, 5 pages. |
European Extended Search Report in related EP Application No. 16190017.0, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 6 pages. |
Padzensky, Ron; “Augmera; Gesture Control”, Dated Apr. 18, 2015, 15 pages [Examiner Cited Art in Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2017 in related Application.]. |
Grabowski, Ralph; “New Commands in AutoCADS 2010: Part 11 Smoothing 3D Mesh Objects” Dated 2011 (per examiner who cited reference), 6 pages, [Examiner Cited Art in Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2017 in related Application.]. |
Theodoropoulos, Gabriel; “Using Gesture Recognizers to Handle Pinch, Rotate, Pan, Swipe, and Tap Gestures” dated Aug. 25, 2014, 34 pages, [Examiner Cited Art in Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2017 in related Application.]. |
Wikipedia, “Microlens”, Downloaded from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microlens, pp. 3. {Cited by Examiner in Feb. 9, 2017 Final Office Action in related matter}. |
Fukaya et al., “Characteristics of Speckle Random Pattern and Its Applications”, pp. 317-327, Nouv. Rev. Optique, t.6, n.6. (1975) {Cited by Examiner in Feb. 9, 2017 Final Office Action in related matter: downloaded Mar. 2, 2017 from http://iopscience.iop.org}. |
European Examination report in related EP Application No. 14181437.6, dated Feb. 8, 2017, 5 pages [References have been previously cited]. |
European Partial Search Report for related EP Application No. 15190306.9, dated May 6, 2016, 8 pages. |
Mike Stensvold, “get the Most Out of Variable Aperture Lenses”, published on www.OutdoorPhotogrpaher.com; dated Dec. 7, 2010; 4 pages, [As noted on search report retrieved from URL: http;//www.outdoorphotographer.com/gear/lenses/get-the-most-out-ofvariable-aperture-lenses.html on Feb. 9, 2016]. |
European Search Report for related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated May 24, 2016, 8 pages [New Reference cited herein; Reference DE102007037282 A1 and its US Counterparts have been previously cited]. |
European extended search report in related EP Application 16190833.0, dated Mar. 9, 2017, 8 pages. [only new art has been cited; US Publication 2014/0034731 was previously cited]. |
United Kingdom Combined Search and Examination Report in related Application No. GB1620676.5, dated Mar. 8, 2017, 6 pages. [References have been previously cited; WO2014/151746, WO2012/175731, US 2014/0313527, GB2503978]. |
European Exam Report in related , EP Application No. 16168216.6, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 5 pages, [References have been previously cited; WO2011/017241 and US 2014/0104413]. |
Chinese Notice of Reexamination in related Chinese Application 201520810313.3, dated Mar. 14, 2017, English computer Translation provided, 7 pages [No new art cited]. |
Extended European search report in related EP Application 16199707.7, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 15 pages. |
Ulusoy et al., One-Shot Scanning using De Bruijn Spaced Grids, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops, 7 pages [Cited in EP Extended search report dated Apr. 10, 2017]. |
Thorlabs Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, download from https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup—id=6430, 4 pages. |
Eksma Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, downloaded from http://eksmaoptics.com/optical-systems/f-theta-lenses/f-theta-lens-for-1064-nm/, 2 pages. |
Sill Optics, Examiner Cited NPL in Advisory Action dated Apr. 12, 2017 in related commonly owned application, http://www.silloptics.de/1/products/sill-encyclopedia/laser-optics/f-theta-lenses/, 4 pages. |
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15176943.7, dated Apr. 12, 2017, 6 pages [Art previously cited in this matter]. |
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 15188440.0, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 4 pages [No new art to cite]. |
Ralph Grabowski, “Smothing 3D Mesh Objects,”New Commands in AutoCAD 2010: Part 11, Examiner Cited art in related matter Non Final Office Action dated May 19, 2017; 6 pages. |
European Exam Report in related EP Application No. 16152477.2, dated Jun. 20, 2017, 4 pages [No art to be cited]. |
Boavida et al., “Dam monitoring using combined terrestrial imaging systems”, 2009 Civil Engineering Survey De/Jan. 2009, pp. 33-38 {Cited in Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 15, 2017 in related matter}. |
EP Search Report in related EP Application No. 17171844 dated Sep. 18, 2017. 4 pages [Only new art cited herein}. |
European Exam Report in related EP Applciation 16172995.9, dated Jul. 6, 2017, 9 pages [No new art to be cited]. |
United Kingdom Search Report in related Application No. GB1700338.5, dated Jun. 30, 2017, 5 pages. |
European Search Report in related EP Application No. 17175357.7, dated Aug. 17, 2017, pp. 1-7 [No new art to be cited]. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140104414 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61714394 | Oct 2012 | US |