Patent Grant
10918778
The present invention relates generally to use of a no or low sodium infusate that is administered to a patient's peritoneal cavity to directly remove sodium, and thereby fluid from the body to alleviate fluid overload in heart failure patients with residual renal function, hereinafter, a DSR infusate. The methods, DSR infusate and apparatus work to remove excess fluid through the removal of sodium. Sodium is moved to the peritoneal cavity through one or both of: 1) ultrafiltration and/or 2) diffusion down a steep concentration gradient, from where it is subsequently eliminated. Fluid is eliminated from the body to maintain a relatively stable serum sodium concentration, by one or both of: 1) inducing osmotic ultrafiltration to move fluid from the patient's body into the peritoneal cavity, from where it is eliminated and/or 2) enhancing the excretion of excess fluid via the kidneys through urination.
Patients suffering from any of a number of forms of heart failure are prone to the accumulation of additional sodium in body tissues and resultingly, increased fluid in the body. For example, in congestive heart failure, due to dysfunction of the left side or right side of the heart, or both, the body is unable to pump blood with normal efficiency, leading to the reduction in systemic circulation that can result in retention of sodium and stasis or pooling of blood or fluid in the lungs or liver, edema and/or cardiac hypertrophy.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that about 5.7 million people in the United States suffer from some form of heart failure. Heart failure is generally categorized into four different stages with the most severe being end stage heart failure. End stage heart failure may be diagnosed where a patient has heart failure symptoms at rest in spite of medical treatment. Patients may have systolic heart failure, characterized by decreased ejection fraction. In patients with systolic heart failure, the walls of the ventricle are weak and do not squeeze as forcefully as in a healthy patient. Consequently, during systole a reduced volume of oxygenated blood is ejected into circulation, a situation that continues in a downward spiral until death. Patients alternatively may have diastolic heart failure, in which stiffened or thickened myocardium makes it difficult for the affected heart chamber to fill with blood. A patient diagnosed with end stage heart failure has a one-year mortality rate of approximately 50%.
Renal failure, also referred to as chronic kidney disease (“CKD”), is diagnosed by blood tests that measure blood urea nitrogen (“BUN”) and creatinine, enabling estimation of glomerular filtration rate (“GFR”). GFR is an overall index of kidney function that is calculated by any of a number of well-known formulae, such as CKD-EPI creatinine equation (2009) or CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin equation (2012) and takes into account a patient's serum creatinine, age, gender and race. For example, the GFR may be computed using the CKD-EPI creatinine equation (2009) as follows:
eGFR=141×min(SCr/κ,1)α×max(SCr/κ,1)−1209×0.993Age×1.018 [if female]×1.159 [if Black]
Generally, assessment of the severity of CKD is based on the computed GFR value in conjunction with the following table:
Typically, a patient with severely reduced kidney function, generally stage 5, will receive dialysis to remove metabolic waste from the blood when the kidneys can no longer do so adequately. Dialysis may be accomplished using either an extracorporeal machine or peritoneal dialysis. In the first option, the patient is coupled to a hemodialyzer, in which case blood is routed from the body to an extracorporeal machine, cleansed, and then returned to the patient's body. In peritoneal dialysis, a cleansing fluid or dialysate is infused into the patient's abdomen, where it causes metabolic waste to pass from the abdominal arteries and veins into the dialysate for a specified period of time, e.g., 30-45 minutes, after which the dialysate is drained from the abdomen and discarded. Typically, the patient may repeat this process between three and five times each 24-hour period.
Low sodium dialysates are known for use in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis to treat CKD. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,197 to Shockley et al. describes a dialysate for use in peritoneal dialysis wherein the sodium concentration is between about 35 to 125 meq/L. As explained in that patent, the sodium concentration in the solution may be decreased to a level below the patient's plasma concentration of sodium, thus causing sodium to be transported from the circulation to the peritoneal cavity. Unfortunately, problems were encountered with such low sodium dialysates, including symptomatic drops in blood pressure, and in some cases dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, a potentially fatal complication resulting in cerebral edema, coma and death. See, e.g., Nakayma, Clinical Effect of Low Na Concentration Dialysate (120 mEq/L) for CAPD Patients, PD Conference, San See, e.g., Zepeda-Orozco D, Quigley R., Dialysis disequilibrium syndrome, Pediatric Nephrology (Berlin, Germany) 2012; 27(12):2205-2211.
In view of the past experience with low sodium dialysates, people with end-stage kidney disease who receive dialysis on a regular basis rely on therapy to optimize salt and water levels. The reported current average concentration of sodium in dialysate is generally about 132 mMol/L. See, e.g., Hecking M, Kainz A, Horl W H, Herkner H, Sunder-Plassmann G., Sodium setpoint and sodium gradient: influence on plasma sodium change and weight gain. American Journal of Nephrology 2011; 33(1):39-48; Mc Causland F R, Brunelli S M, Waikar S S., Dialysate sodium, serum sodium and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2012; 27(4):1613-8.
Decades of experience with dialysate sodium concentrations that are higher than patients' blood sodium levels show that such dialysates facilitate fluid removal without removal of sodium during dialysis and improve the likelihood of maintaining normal BP and heart function during dialysis. However, higher sodium levels also result in people on hemodialysis often dialyzing with a positive sodium gradient between their blood and the dialysate. See, e.g., Munoz Mendoza J, Sun S, Chertow G, Moran J, Doss S, Schiller B., Dialysate sodium and sodium gradient in maintenance hemodialysis: a neglected sodium restriction approach?, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2011; 26(4):1281-7. Accordingly, patients often gain sodium by the end of a dialysis session, resulting in increased thirst, fluid consumption and hypertension. As such, the net result for patients having multiple weekly hemodialysis sessions is chronic sodium and water overload.
Applicants have observed that eliminating fluid overload is a key clinical objective in heart failure, and that fluid overload can lead to serious clinical complications including dyspnea. Achieving effective reduction of fluid requires the elimination of sodium from the body, as the body will act to maintain a constant serum osmolality and to maintain its sodium levels, as described for example, in Guyton & Hall, Textbook of Medical Physiology. Accordingly, it would be desirable to develop a method for using no or low sodium infusates to remove sodium and thereby fluid from the patient to treat fluid overload in heart failure patients.
The present invention is directed to methods of treating fluid overload in heart failure patients with residual renal function using a no or low sodium DSR infusate administered to the peritoneal cavity to remove sodium and thereby fluid from the patients' body to alleviate fluid overload. Sodium is moved to the peritoneal cavity through one or both of: 1) ultrafiltration and/or 2) diffusion down a steep concentration gradient, from where it is subsequently eliminated. Fluid is eliminated from the body to maintain a relatively stable serum sodium concentration, by one or both of: 1) inducing osmotic ultrafiltration to move fluid (osmotic ulfiltrate) from the patient's body into the peritoneal cavity, from where it is eliminated and/or 2) enhancing the excretion of excess fluid via the kidneys through urination. As such, the present invention eliminates sodium from the body and thereby fluid to maintain relatively stable serum sodium concentrations, reducing fluid overload and edema, while preventing hyponatremia.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a patient suffering from heart failure is treated (either intermittently or continuously) with a low sodium or no sodium DSR infusate administered to the peritoneal cavity. The DSR infusate, which in an exemplary form may comprise a D-10 dextrose solution, i.e., 10 grams dextrose per 100 ml of aqueous solution, is allowed to remain in the peritoneal cavity for a predetermined period before it is removed, and then is extracted together with sodium that moves from the patient's body into the peritoneal cavity and the osmotic ultrafiltrate. The proposed direct sodium removal (“DSR”) method constitutes a radical departure from conventional peritoneal dialysis, in that it is designed specifically to treat fluid overload in heart failure patients, rather than attempting to remove toxins and accumulated metabolic byproducts by cleansing the tissues with a dialysate, as in conventional peritoneal dialysis.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, the inventive DSR method, infusates and apparatus are expected to be suitable for use in heart failure patients suffering from fluid overload who generally demonstrate a GFR value greater than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and should exhibit kidney function from normal to CKD Stage 4. In patients with CKD of Stage 5 or GFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2, use of a no or low sodium DSR infusate with volumes adequate for dialysis would result in dangerous or terminal hyponatremia and reduction in plasma volume leading to hemodynamic collapse. Conversely, use of small volumes of a no or low sodium DSR infusate to avoid hyponatremia in these patients who needed dialysis would not provide sufficient removal of waste products, and may result in uremia. In other words, patients suitable for direct sodium removal using the method of the present invention would be patients not normally eligible for dialysis for the purpose of CKD treatment.
In particular, due to concern regarding symptomatic blood pressure drop, as well as hyponatremia and related effects, patients normally eligible for dialysis with end-stage kidney insufficiency, exhibiting CKD of Stage 5 or GFR less than or equal to 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 specifically should be excluded from the pool of patients eligible for use with the DSR methods of the present invention.
The proposed methods of using a no or low sodium DSR infusate in accordance with the principles of the present invention may be accomplished with the implantable pump system described in commonly-assigned U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2014/0066841, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. That published application describes a system for ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in which a patient infuses a dialysate into the abdomen, and after a predetermined time and at predetermined intervals, an implantable pump transfers volumes of dialysate to the patient's bladder, where it may be excreted through urination. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the process is performed not to address or even principally address CKD. Instead, the process is performed with a no or low sodium DSR infusate to remove sodium in heart failure patients suffering from fluid overload who retain residual renal function. As a result, fluid is removed from the body through i) urination (as a result of the remaining kidney function) and ii) direct removal of the osmotic ultrafiltrate, to restore serum sodium concentrations and reduce fluid overload and edema, while preventing hyponatremia.
The present invention is directed to methods of treating fluid overload in various forms of heart failure, such as left heart or right heart dysfunction. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a heart failure patient with residual renal function suffering from fluid overload is treated with a no or low sodium DSR infusate administered to the peritoneal cavity. The low sodium concentration in the DSR infusate causes sodium and fluid (osmotic ultrafiltrate) to pass from the patient's body into the peritoneal cavity. The DSR infusate is allowed to remain, or dwell, in the peritoneal cavity for a pre-determined period before it is removed, together with the extracted sodium and the osmotic ultrafiltrate. Removal of the sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity may be performed using an implantable system, such as the Alfapump commercialized by Sequana Medical AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
As used in this disclosure, a no or low sodium DSR infusate has a sodium content of less than 120 meq/L, more preferably, less than 35 meq/L, and includes infusates having virtually zero concentration of sodium. Accordingly, the fluid overload treatment methods of the present invention specifically contemplate use of the inventive methods in heart failure patients having residual kidney function, and thus not in kidney failure. As used in this specification, residual kidney function corresponds to patients having a GFR value greater than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or kidney function from normal to CKD of Stage 4.
Exemplary DSR infusate formulations in accordance with the principles of the present invention include D-0.5 to D-50 solutions, i.e., from 0.5 to 50 grams of dextrose per 100 ml of aqueous solution; Icodextrin solutions having from 0.5 to 50 grams of icodextrin per 100 ml of aqueous solution; high molecular weight glucose polymer solutions (weight average molecular weight Da>10,000) having from 0.5 to 50 grams of high molecular weight glucose polymer per 100 ml of aqueous solution, and combinations thereof. The aqueous solution includes at least purified water, and may in addition include electrolytes such as low amounts of magnesium or calcium salts, preservatives, ingredients having antimicrobial or antifungal properties, or buffering materials to control pH of the infusate. It is expected that Icodextrin, a high molecular weight glucose polymer, or other high molecular weight glucose polymer (weight average molecular weight, Da>10,000,) may be preferable to dextrose because it has been observed to experience a lower rate of uptake when employed in a peritoneal dialysis setting, and thus may provide reduced serum glucose concentrations compared to a dextrose-based DSR solutions.
It is expected that the no or low sodium DSR infusate described herein should not be used on all heart failure patients with fluid overload, particularly those with little residual renal function, as the result could be fatal. For example, it is expected that use of the methods and DSR infusate of the present invention on heart failure patients having a GFR value lower than 15 or CKD of Stage 5, may result in severe hyponatremia and hypotension. Accordingly, for safety reasons, patients suffering from heart failure but also in kidney failure, or with a GFR less than or equal to 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or CKD of Stage 5 are contraindicated for use with the methods of treatment described herein.
Although it is contemplated that the inventive methods and DSR infusate may be used to treat fluid overload in heart failure with conventional peritoneal infusion and drainage techniques, it is expected that practice of the present invention may be particularly advantageously implemented using the implantable pump system offered by the assignee of the present application. Specifically, the Alfapump system, offered by Sequana Medical AG, Zurich, Switzerland, is well suited for treating heart failure using a peritoneal infusion mode of operation. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the no or low sodium DSR infusate is introduced into the peritoneal cavity, where the zero or low sodium concentration causes sodium and osmotic ultrafiltrate to pass from the patient's body into the peritoneal cavity. At predetermined times after infusion of the DSR infusate, and for predetermined intervals, the implantable pump may be activated, in accordance with a clinician's programmed instructions, to pump the sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate to the patient's bladder at a predetermined flow rate. Removal of sodium from the body leads to the removal of fluid by i) the functioning kidneys through urination and ii) accumulation of osmotic ultrafiltrate directly into the peritoneal cavity, which is then removed to the bladder via the implantable pump. In this manner, sodium and fluid is removed, while maintaining appropriate and stable serum sodium concentrations. Further, it is expected that after a DSR session, fluid will continue to accumulate in the peritoneal cavity as a result of the fluid overload, and the implantable pump may be programmed to pump such fluid to the bladder on a regular basis. The fluid accumulating in the peritoneal cavity is expected to contain sodium so the removal of such fluid to the bladder will lead to a further reduction of fluid overload in these patients.
The methods of the present invention therefore provide a method of controlling fluid overload and edema in heart failure patients while permitting such patients to experience a more normal lifestyle, untethered from frequent visits to a hospital or other medical facility. Advantageously, because the methods of the present invention lead to a reduction in fluid volume, the patient not only may experience improved comfort and lifestyle, but also forestalled co-morbidities, such as advancing chronic kidney disease and progressive heart failure.
An exemplary implantable system for practicing the method of the present invention is described in greater detail below as including an implantable pump that is specially configured to move fluid out of the peritoneal cavity and into the bladder, and that includes a plurality of sensors for monitoring and recording operating parameters relevant to the health of the patient. An externally held charging and communication system periodically charges and communicates with the implantable device, and downloads from the device the recorded operating parameters. Monitoring and control software on the treating physician's computer receives the recorded operating parameters from the charging and communication system, and allows the physician to modify the operation of the implantable device based on the physician's perception of the patient's health as reflected in the recorded operating parameters. Optionally, the monitoring and control software may be configured to alert the physician as to a prediction or detection of infection, heart failure decompensation or other clinical events based on the recorded operating parameters. The implantable device optionally may also include one or more ultraviolet (UV) sources configured to inhibit infection.
Overview of an Exemplary System for Implementing the Inventive Method
Referring to
Implantable device 20 comprises an electromechanical pump having housing 21 configured for subcutaneous implantation. As described in further detail below with reference to
Optional reservoir 45 is configured to deliver the no or low sodium DSR infusate to the patient's peritoneal cavity via catheter 46, which may have similar construction to the peritoneal catheter described further below with respect to
In the embodiment of
Preferably, implantable device 20 is configured to move the sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder in quantities, intervals and flow rates selected to provide sufficient time for the targeted amount of sodium to accumulate in the DSR infusate resulting in a reduction of sodium in the body leading to the removal of fluid by i) the functioning kidneys (through urination) and ii) direct removal to the bladder of the osmotic ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity thereby reducing fluid overload and edema resulting from heart failure. Treatment algorithms may be developed with different formulations and volumes of no or low sodium DSR infusates, different lengths of dwell period and different rates of removal to the bladder. In general, pumping for short but frequent intervals is expected to inhibit the accumulation of material on the interior lumens of catheters 23 and 25, and reduce the risk of tissue ingrowth. The fluid circuit of implantable device 20 may be configured to provide an average flow rate of about 1-2.5 liters/hour, although much higher and lower flow rates are possible if needed. As described in detail below, the pumping time, flow rate and volume, including the time the DSR infusate is allowed to remain in the peritoneal cavity, may be programmed by the physician using monitoring and control system 40 as required for a specific patient.
Implantable device 20 may include pressure sensors that monitor pressure in one or both of the peritoneal cavity and the bladder, such that fluid is pumped from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder if the intra-abdominal pressure exceeds a limit determined by the physician. Alternatively or in addition, the output of the pressure sensors may cause pumping of fluid into the bladder to be disabled until the bladder is determined to have sufficient space to accommodate additional fluid. For patient comfort, implantable device 10 optionally may be programmed not to pump at night or when an accelerometer included in the implantable device indicates that the patient is asleep (and thus unlikely to be able to void the bladder). Implantable device 20 preferably includes multiple separate fail-safe mechanisms, to ensure that urine cannot pass from the bladder to the peritoneal cavity through the pump, thereby reducing the risk of transmitting infection.
Still referring to
Handpiece 32 preferably includes housing 33 having multi-function button 34, display 35, a plurality of light emitting diodes (LEDs, not shown) and inductive coil portion 36. Multi-function button 34 provides the patient the ability to issue a limited number of commands to implantable device 20, while display 35 provides visible confirmation that a desired command has been input; it also displays battery status. Inductive coil portion 36 houses an inductive coil that is used transfer energy from handpiece 32 to recharge the battery of implantable device 20. The LEDs, which are visible through the material of housing 33 when lit, may be arranged in three rows of two LEDs each, and are coupled to the control circuitry and inductive charging circuit contained within handpiece 32. The LEDs may be arranged to light up to reflect the degree of inductive coupling achieved between handpiece 32 and implantable device 20 during recharging of the latter. Alternatively, the LEDs may be omitted and an analog display provided on display 35 indicating the quality of inductive coupling.
Control circuitry contained within handpiece 32 is coupled to the inductive charging circuit, battery, LEDs and radio transceiver, and includes memory for storing information from implantable device 20. Handpiece 32 also preferably includes a data port, such as a USB port, that permits the handpiece to be coupled to monitoring and control system 40 during visits by the patient to the physician's office. Alternatively, handpiece 32 may include a wireless chip, e.g., conforming to the Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11 wireless standards, thereby enabling the handpiece to communicate wirelessly with monitoring and control system 40, either directly or via the Internet.
Monitoring and control system 40 is intended primarily for use by the physician and comprises software configured to run on a conventional computer, e.g., a laptop as illustrated in
Turning now to
Referring now to
Optional DSR infusate reservoir 45 is positioned outside of the body, coupled to the peritoneal cavity via catheter 46. Catheter 46 is coupled to reservoir 45 via connector 47, which is configured so as to allow the patient to periodically replace reservoir 45 with ease. Catheter 46 preferably includes apertures 53′, which may be similar in dimension and density to apertures 53, and which allow the DSR infusate to flow into the peritoneal cavity 11 in a relatively diffuse manner. Optional external pump 48 may be configured to cause the DSR infusate to flow from reservoir 45 into the peritoneal cavity 11 at a desired rate. For example, reservoir 45 may be positioned on a belt (not shown) that is worn around the patient's waist and includes pump 48. Pump 48 may be configured to communicate wirelessly with implantable device 20 so as to coordinate delivery of DSR infusate into the patient's peritoneal cavity.
In an alternative embodiment, DSR infusate reservoir 45 is positioned at a level above the peritoneal cavity 11 such that gravity causes the DSR infusate to flow from reservoir 45 into the peritoneum at a desired rate. In yet another embodiment, a pressurized container may be configured in combination with a controlled valve or a calibrated flow restriction device to deliver a predefined flow rate without the use of a pump. In this manner the delivery of the DSR infusate may be passive without the need for electronics or a pump. Delivery of a predefined amount of the DSR infusate may be recognized by the implantable device based on pressure increase within the peritoneal cavity, use of a flow meter, or other suitable measurement system.
In the embodiments discussed above, reservoir 45 preferably provides DSR infusate to peritoneal cavity 11 in a volume, at a rate, and with a frequency suitable to sufficiently fill the peritoneal cavity with the DSR infusate to treat or alleviate the fluid overload of the heart failure patient.
Alternatively, as illustrated in
After the DSR infusate has dwelled in the peritoneal cavity for a predetermined amount of time, implantable device 20 may pump that DSR infusate and the osmotic ultrafiltrate to the patient's bladder 13 by closing off communication to catheter 46′ by appropriately actuating valve 49 and opening communication to catheter 25 by appropriately actuating valve 49′ and turning in a second direction (opposite from the first) so as to pump the fluid into bladder 13 via catheters 23 and 25. It should be appreciated that the functionalities of valves 49 and 49′ may be provided by any desired number of valves that are disposed appropriately along catheters 23, 25, and 46′ and are controllably actuated by implantable device 20, e.g., via valve controller 86 illustrated in
Methods of using the exemplary implantable systems, such as illustrated in
Sodium is moved from the patient's body via the peritoneal membrane into the peritoneal cavity, from where it is removed to the bladder. This reduces the level of sodium in the body resulting in the elimination of fluid by i) the functioning kidneys through urination and ii) removal to the bladder of the osmotic ultrafiltrate that accumulates in the peritoneal cavity, restoring the serum sodium concentration and reducing the patient's volume of fluid (step 1020). The sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate is pumped from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder with the implantable device (step 1030). Such pumping may occur after the DSR infusate has been in the peritoneal cavity for a sufficient amount of time to draw a sufficient amount of sodium out of the body to alleviate the fluid overload as described above. Kidneys of the patient also may then excrete fluid through urination, thereby restoring serum sodium concentration (step 1040).
Energy may be wirelessly transferred to the implantable device, and data received from the device, using a charging and communication system such as described above with reference to
Further details of selected components of the exemplary system of
Peritoneal and Bladder Catheters
Referring to
Inlet end 52 also may include a polyester cuff to promote adhesion of the catheter to an adjacent tissue wall, thereby ensuring that the inlet end of the catheter remains in position. Outlet end 54 also may include a connector for securing the outlet end of the peritoneal catheter to implantable device 20. In one preferred embodiment, the distal end of the peritoneal catheter, up to the ingrowth cuff, may be configured to pass through a conventional 16 F peel-away sheath. In addition, the length of the peritoneal catheter may be selected to ensure that it lies along the bottom of the body cavity, and is sufficiently resistant to torsional motion so as not to become twisted or kinked during or after implantation.
With respect to
In a preferred embodiment, bladder catheter 60 is configured to pass through a conventional peel-away sheath. Bladder catheter 60 preferably is sufficiently resistant to torsional motion so as not to become twisted or kinked during or after implantation. In a preferred embodiment, peritoneal catheter 50 and bladder catheter 60 preferably are different colors, have different exterior shapes (e.g., square and round) or have different connection characteristics so that they cannot be inadvertently interchanged during connection to implantable device 20. Optionally, bladder catheter 60 may include an internal duckbill valve positioned midway between inlet 62 and outlet end 63 of the catheter to ensure that urine does not flow from the bladder into the peritoneal cavity if the bladder catheter is accidentally pulled free from the pump connector of implantable device 20 and/or if the pump of implantable device 20 is actuated so as to draw the DSR infusate from reservoir 45 into the patient's peritoneal cavity.
In an alternative embodiment, the peritoneal and bladder catheters devices may incorporate one or several anti-infective agents to inhibit the spread of infection between body cavities. Examples of anti-infective agents which may be utilized may include, e.g., bacteriostatic materials, bactericidal materials, one or more antibiotic dispensers, antibiotic eluting materials, and coatings that prevent bacterial adhesion, and combinations thereof. Additionally, implantable device 20 may include a UV lamp configured to irradiate fluid in the peritoneal and/or bladder catheters so as to kill any pathogens that may be present and thus inhibit the development of infection, as described further below with respect to
Alternatively, rather than comprising separate catheters, peritoneal and bladder catheters 50, 60 may share a common wall, which may be convenient because the bladder and peritoneal cavity share a common wall, thereby facilitating insertion of a single dual-lumen tube. In addition, either or both of the peritoneal or bladder catheters may be reinforced along a portion of its length or along its entire length using ribbon or wire braiding or lengths of wire or ribbon embedded or integrated within or along the catheters. The braiding or wire may be fabricated from metals such as stainless steels, superelastic metals such as nitinol, or from a variety of suitable polymers. Such reinforcement may also be used for catheter 46 connected to optional reservoir 45.
With respect to
Malecot structure 66 preferably is constructed so that wings 67 deform to a substantially flattened configuration when a stylet is inserted through the lumen of the catheter. In this manner, bladder catheter 60′ may be loaded onto a stylet, and using a minimally invasive technique, outlet end 63′ and malecot structure 66 may be passed through the wall of a patient's bladder using the stylet. When the stylet is removed, wings 67 of the malecot structure return to the expanded shape shown in
The Implantable Device
Referring now to
Processor 70 executes firmware stored in nonvolatile memory 71 which controls operation of motor 73 responsive to signals generated by motor 73, sensors 77-81 and commands received from transceiver 76. Processor 70 also controls reception and transmission of messages via transceiver 76 and operation of inductive circuit 75 to charge battery 74. In addition, processor 70 receives signals generated by Hall Effect sensors located within motor 73, which are used to compute direction and revolutions of the gears of the gear pump, and thus fluid volume pumped and the viscosity of that fluid, as described below. Processor 70 preferably includes a low-power mode of operation and includes an internal clock, such that the processor can be periodically awakened to handle pumping, pump tick mode, or communications and charging functions, and/or awakened to handle commands received by transceiver 76 from handpiece 32. In one embodiment, processor 70 comprises a member of the MSP430 family of microcontroller units available from Texas Instruments, Incorporated, Dallas, Tex., and may incorporate the nonvolatile memory, volatile memory, and radio transceiver components depicted in
Nonvolatile memory 71 preferably comprises flash memory or EEPROM, and stores a unique device identifier for implantable device 20, firmware to be executed on processor 70, configuration set point data relating to operation of the implantable device, and optionally, coding to be executed on transceiver 76 and/or inductive circuit 75, and a separate motor controller, if present. Firmware and set point data stored on nonvolatile memory 71 may be updated using new instructions provided by control and monitoring system 40 via charging and communication system 30. Volatile memory 72 is coupled to and supports operation of processor 70, and stores data and event log information gathered during operation of implantable device 20. Volatile memory 72 also serves as a buffer for communications sent to, and received from, charging and communication system 30.
Transceiver 76 preferably comprises a radio frequency transceiver and is configured for bi-directional communications via antenna 76 with a similar transceiver circuit disposed in handpiece 32 of charging and communication system 30. Transceiver 76 also may include a low power mode of operation, such that it periodically awakens to listen for incoming messages and responds only to those messages including the unique device identifier assigned to that implantable device. Alternatively, because transceiver 76 communicates only with the corresponding transceiver in handpiece 32 of its associated charging and communication system 30, transceiver 76 may be configured to send or receive data only when inductive circuit 75 of the implantable device is active. In addition, transceiver 76 may employ an encryption routine to ensure that messages sent from, or received by, the implantable device cannot be intercepted or forged.
Inductive circuit 75 is coupled to coil 84, and is configured to recharge battery 74 of the implantable device when exposed to a magnetic field supplied by a corresponding inductive circuit within handpiece 32 of charging and communication system 30. In one embodiment, inductive circuit 75 is coupled to optional infrared LED 83 that emits an infrared signal when inductive circuit 75 is active. The infrared signal may be received by handpiece 32 of charging and communication system 30 to assist in locating the handpiece relative to the implantable device, thereby improving the magnetic coupling and energy transmission to the implantable device.
Inductive circuit 75 optionally may be configured not only to recharge battery 74, but to directly provide energy to motor 73 in a “boost” mode or jog/shake mode to unblock the pump. In particular, if processor 70 detects that motor 73 is stalled, e.g., due to a block created by fibrin or other debris in the peritoneal cavity, an alarm may be stored in memory. When implantable device 20 next communicates with charging and communication system 30, the alarm is reported to handpiece 32, and the patient may be given the option of depressing multifunction button 34 to apply an overvoltage to motor 73 from inductive circuit 75 for a predetermined time period to free the pump blockage. Alternatively, depressing the multi-function button may cause processor 70 to execute a set of commands by which motor 73 is jogged or shaken, e.g., by alternatingly running the motor is reverse and then forward, to disrupt the blockage. Because such modes of operation may employ higher energy consumption than expected during normal operation, it is advantageous to drive the motor during such procedures with energy supplied via inductive circuit 75.
Battery 74 preferably comprises a lithium ion or lithium polymer battery capable of long lasting operation, e.g., up to three years, when implanted in a human, so as to minimize the need for re-operations to replace implantable device 20. In one preferred embodiment, battery 74 supplies a nominal voltage of 3.6V, a capacity of 150 mAh when new, and a capacity of about 120 mAh after two years of use. Preferably, battery 74 is configured to supply a current of 280 mA to motor 73 when pumping; 25 mA when the transceiver is communicating with charging and communication system 30; 8 mA when processor 70 and related circuitry is active, but not pumping or communicating; and 0.3 mA when the implantable device is in low power mode. More preferably, battery 74 should be sized to permit a minimum current of at least 450 mAh for a period of 10 seconds and 1 A for 25 milliseconds during each charging cycle.
Motor 73 preferably is a brushless direct current or electronically commuted motor having a splined output shaft that drives a set of floating gears that operate as a gear pump, as described below. Motor 73 may include a dedicated motor controller, separate from processor 70, for controlling operation of the motor. Motor 73 may include a plurality of Hall Effect sensors, preferably two or more, for determining motor position and direction of rotation. Due to the high humidity that may be encountered in implantable device 20, processor 70 may include programming to operate motor 73, although with reduced accuracy, even if some or all of the Hall Effect sensors fail.
In a preferred embodiment, motor 73 is capable of driving the gear pump to generate a nominal flow rate of 150 ml/min and applying a torque of about 1 mNm against a pressure head of 30 cm water at 3000 RPM. In this embodiment, the motor preferably is selected to drive the gears at from 1000 to 5000 RPM, corresponding to flow rates of from 50 to 260 ml/min, respectively. The motor preferably has a stall torque of at least 3 mNm at 500 mA at 3 V, and more preferably 6 mNm in order to crush non-solid proteinaceous materials. As discussed above, the motor preferably also supports a boost mode of operation, e.g., at 5 V, when powered directly through inductive circuit 75. Motor 73 preferably also is capable of being driven in reverse as part of a jogging or shaking procedure to unblock the gear pump.
Processor 70 may be programmed to automatically and periodically wake up and enter a pump tick mode. In this mode of operation, the gear pump is advanced slightly, e.g., about 120 degrees as measured by the Hall Effect sensors, before processor 70 returns to low power mode. Preferably, this interval is about every 20 minutes, although it may be adjusted by the physician using the monitoring and control system. This pump tick mode is expected to prevent the DSR infusate and the osmotic ultrafiltrate from partially solidifying, and blocking the gear pump.
In addition, processor 70 also may be programmed to enter a jog or shake mode when operating on battery power alone, to unblock the gear pump. Similar to the boost mode available when charging the implantable device with the handpiece of charging and communication system 30, the jog or shake mode causes the motor to rapidly alternate the gears between forward and reverse directions to crush or loosen any buildup of tissue or other debris in the gear pump or elsewhere in the fluid path. Specifically, in this mode of operation, if the motor does not start to turn within a certain time period after it is energized (e.g., 1 second), the direction of the motion is reversed for a short period of time and then reversed again to let the motor turn in the desired direction. If the motor does still not turn (e.g., because the gear pump is jammed) the direction is again reversed for a period of time (e.g., another 10 msec). If the motor still is not able to advance the time interval between reversals of the motor direction is reduced to allow for the motor to develop more power, resulting in a shaking motion of the gears. If the motor does not turn forward for more than 4 seconds, the jog mode of operation is stopped, and an alarm is written to the event log. If the motor was unable to turn forward, processor 70 will introduce a backwards tick before the next scheduled fluid movement. A backward tick is the same as a tick (e.g., about 120 degrees forward movement of the motor shaft) but in the reverse direction, and is intended to force the motor backwards before turning forward, which should allow the motor to gain momentum.
Sensors 77-81 continually monitor humidity, temperature, acceleration, pressure, and respiratory rate, and provide corresponding signals to processor 70 which stores the corresponding data in memory 71 for later transmission to monitoring and control system 40. In particular, humidity sensor 77 is arranged to measure humidity within the housing of the implantable device, to ensure that the components of implantable device are operated within expected operational limits. Humidity sensor 77 preferably is capable of sensing and reporting humidity within a range or 20% to 100% with high accuracy. One or more of temperature sensors 78 may be disposed within the housing and monitor the temperature of the implantable device, and in particular battery 74 to ensure that the battery does not overheat during charging, while another one or more of temperature sensors 78 may be disposed so as to contact fluid entering at inlet 62 and thus monitor the temperature of the fluid, e.g., for use in assessing the patient's health. Accelerometer 79 is arranged to measure acceleration of the implant, preferably along at least two axes, to detect periods of activity and inactivity, e.g., to determine whether the patient is sleeping or to determine whether and when the patient is active. This information is provided to processor 70 to ensure that the pump is not operated when the patient is indisposed to attend to voiding of the bladder.
Implantable device 20 preferably includes multiple pressure sensors 80, which are continually monitored during waking periods of the processor. As described below with respect to
Respiratory rate monitor 81 is configured to measure the patient's respiratory rate, e.g., for use in assessing the patient's health. Alternatively, the patient's respiratory rate may be measured based on the outputs of one or more of pressure sensors 80, e.g., based on changes in the ambient pressure or the pressure in the peritoneal cavity caused by the diaphragm periodically compressing that cavity during breathing.
Any desired number of additional sensors for measuring the health of the patient may also be provided in operable communication with processor 70 and may output recordable parameters for storage in memory 71 and transmission to monitoring and control system 40, that the physician may use to assess the patient's health. For example, chemical or biochemical sensors may be provided that are configured to monitor the composition and/or sodium concentration of the sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate.
Processor 70 preferably is programmed to pump a predetermined volume of fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder after that fluid has been in the peritoneal cavity for a predetermined amount of time and with a predetermined frequency. Such volume, time, and frequency preferably are selected to optimize sodium removal to maintain or improve the patient's health and to alleviate the fluid overload. The volume, time, and frequency may be selected based on the patient's symptoms, the activity and habits of the patient, the permeability of the peritoneal membrane and the osmotic characteristics of the DSR infusate. For example, the physician may initially program processor 70 with a first time, volume, and frequency based on his perception of the patient's health and habits, and later may adjust that initial programming to vary the volume, time, and/or frequency based on his perception of changes in the patient's health, for example based on changes over time in parameters measured by implantable device 20 and relayed to the physician via monitoring and control software 40.
Processor 70 also may be programmed to monitor the sensors 77-81 and to generate an alert condition that is relayed to the clinician indicative of a potential decline in the patient's health. For example, processor 70 may monitor pressure sensors 80 to determine whether, over predetermined time intervals, there is an increase in pressure within the peritoneal cavity. Such pressure increases may be the result of an increase in the rate of accumulation of fluid in the peritoneal cavity, which may in turn indicate heart failure decompensation. Such an alert may result in the patient being directed to seek immediate treatment and arrest such decompensation.
In other embodiments, processor 70 may be programmed to pump fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder only when the pressure in the peritoneal cavity exceeds a first predetermined value, and the pressure in the bladder is less than a second predetermined value, so that the bladder does not become overfull. To account for patient travel from a location at sea level to a higher altitude, the ambient pressure measurement may be used to calculate a differential value for the peritoneal pressure. In this way, the predetermined pressure at which the pump begins operation may be reduced, to account for lower atmospheric pressure. Likewise, the ambient pressure may be used to adjust the predetermined value for bladder pressure. In this way, the threshold pressure at which the pumping ceases may be reduced, because the patient may experience bladder discomfort at a lower pressure when at a high altitude location.
Further, processor 70 may be programmed to include a timer that monitors the elapsed time from when the DSR infusate was pumped from the reservoir to the patient's peritoneal cavity, and after expiration of a predetermined or patient-settable dwell time, to pump the sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate from the peritoneal cavity to the patient's bladder. Such timer programming also may include an override feature, such that a parameter measured by sensors 77-81, such as excess pressure in the peritoneal cavity, may trigger transfer of the contents of the peritoneal cavity to the bladder prior to expiration of a designated dwell time.
Optionally, controller 70 is in operable communication with UV lamp 85, which is configured to irradiate and thus kill pathogens in the DSR infusate both before and after fluid is provided to or extracted from the peritoneal cavity. UV lamp 85 preferably generates light in the UV-C spectral range (about 200-280 nm), particularly in the range of about 250-265 nm, which is also referred to as the “germicidal spectrum” because light in that spectral range breaks down nucleic acids in the DNA of microorganisms. Low-pressure mercury lamps have an emission peak at approximately 253.7 nm, and may suitably be used for UV lamp 85. Alternatively, UV lamp 85 may be a UV light emitting diode (LED), which may be based on AlGaAs or GaN.
Under the control of controller 70, UV lamp 85 irradiates any fluid passing through the implantable device for a preselected amount of time sufficient to kill pathogens that may be present in that fluid. Specifically, the flow rate of the fluid through the device may be selected (e.g., pre-programmed) so as to irradiate the fluid with a sufficient dosage of UV light to inhibit the growth of colonies of pathogens. For example, it is known that dosages of 253.7 nm UV light of between about 5,500-7,000 μWs/cm2 are sufficient to provide 100% kill rates for many organisms, including E. coli, Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., Serratia spp., Leptospirosis spp., Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Enterococci. Higher dosages, e.g., between about 8,500-12,000 μWs/cm2, may be required to provide 100% kill rates for other organisms, including Kliebsiella ssp., Enterobacter spp., Psuedomonas spp., and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. However, the dosage to sufficiently inhibit colony growth may be lower. For example, E. coli requires only 3000 μWs/cm2 to inhibit growth, whereas 6,600 μWs/cm2 may be needed to provide a 100% kill rate. Controller 70 may be pre-programmed to set a flow rate of fluid through the tubing sufficient to inhibit colony growth of one or more target pathogens based on the intensity of UV lamp 85, the reflective conditions within the portion of the housing in which UV lamp 85 is used (e.g., upper portion 93 described below with reference to
Still referring to
Referring now to
Housing 91 also may include features designed to reduce movement of the implantable pump once implanted within a patient, such as a suture hole to securely anchor the implantable device to the surrounding tissue. Housing 91 may in addition include a polyester ingrowth patch that facilitates attachment of the implantable device to the surrounding tissue following subcutaneous implantation.
Additionally, the implantable device optionally may incorporate anti-clogging agents, such enzyme eluting materials that specifically target the proteinaceous components of fluid from the peritoneal cavity, enzyme eluting materials that specifically target the proteinaceous and encrustation promoting components of urine, chemical eluting surfaces, coatings that prevent adhesion of proteinaceous compounds, and combinations thereof. Such agents, if provided, may be integrated within or coated upon the surfaces of the various components of the system.
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring now also to
Manifold 105 preferably comprises a molded elastomeric component having two separate fluid channels (such channels designated 88 in
Motor 94 is coupled to gear pump housing 95 using mating threads 130, such that splined shaft 131 of motor 94 passes through bearing 132. The gear pump of the present invention comprises intermeshing gears 133 and 134 enclosed in gear pump housing 95 by O-ring seal 135 and plate 136. The gear pump is self-priming. Plate 136 includes openings 137 and 138 that mate with outlet 125 and inlet 126 of manifold 105, respectively. Splined shaft 131 of motor 94 extends into opening 139 of gear 133 to provide floating engagement with that gear.
The Charging and Communication System
Referring to
As shown in
In a preferred embodiment, handpiece 151 includes a device identifier stored in nonvolatile memory 153 that corresponds to the device identifier stored in nonvolatile memory 71 of the implantable device, such that handpiece 151 will communicate only with its corresponding implantable device 20. Optionally, a configurable handpiece for use in a physician's office may include the ability to interrogate an implantable device to request that device's unique device identifier, and then change the device identifier of the monitoring and control system 40 to that of the patient's implantable device, so as to mimic the patient's handpiece. In this way, a physician may adjust the configuration of the implantable device if the patient forgets to bring his handpiece 151 with him during a visit to the physician's office.
Controller 152 executes firmware stored in nonvolatile memory 153 that controls communications and charging of the implantable device. Controller 152 also is configured to transfer and store data, such as event logs, uploaded to handpiece 151 from the implantable device, for later retransmission to monitoring and control system 40 via port 162, during physician office visits. Alternatively, handpiece 151 may be configured to recognize a designated wireless access point within the physician's office, and to wirelessly communicate with monitoring and control system 40 during office visits. As a further alternative, base 31 may include telephone circuitry for automatically dialing and uploading information stored on handpiece 151 to a physician's website via a secure connection, such as alarm information.
Controller 152 preferably includes a low-power mode of operation and includes an internal clock, such that the controller periodically awakens to communicate with the implantable device to log data or to perform charging functions. Controller 152 preferably is configured to awaken when placed in proximity to the implantable device to perform communications and charging functions, and to transmit commands input using input device 164. Controller 152 further may include programming for evaluating information received from the implantable device, and generating an alarm message on display 159. Controller 152 also may include firmware for transmitting commands input using input device 164 to the implantable device, and monitoring operation of the implantable device during execution of such commands, for example, during boost or jogging/shaking operation of the gear pump to clear a blockage. In addition, controller 152 controls and monitors various power operations of handpiece 151, including operation of inductive circuit 156 during recharging of the implantable device, displaying the state of charge of battery 74, and controlling charging and display of state of charge information for battery 157.
Nonvolatile memory 153 preferably comprises flash memory or EEPROM, and stores the unique device identifier for its associated implantable device, firmware to be executed by controller 152, configuration set point, and optionally, coding to be executed on transceiver 155 and/or inductive circuit 156. Firmware and set point data stored on nonvolatile memory 153 may be updated using information supplied by control and monitoring system 40 via port 162. Volatile memory 154 is coupled to and supports operation of controller 152, and stores data and event log information uploaded from implantable device 20.
In addition, in a preferred embodiment, nonvolatile memory 153 stores programming that enables the charging and communication system to perform some initial start-up functions without communicating with the monitor and control system. In particular, memory 153 may include routines that make it possible to test the implantable device during implantation using the charging and communication system alone in a “self-prime mode” of operation. In this case, a button may be provided that allows the physician to manually start the pump, and display 159 is used to provide feedback whether the pumping session was successful or not. Display 159 of the charging and communication system also may be used to display error messages designed to assist the physician in adjusting the position of the implantable device or peritoneal or bladder catheters. These functions preferably are disabled after the initial implantation of the implantable device.
Transceiver 155 preferably comprises a radio frequency transceiver, e.g., conforming to the Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11 wireless standards, and is configured for bi-directional communications via antenna 160 with transceiver circuit 76 disposed in the implantable device. Transceiver 155 also may include a low power mode of operation, such that it periodically awakens to listen for incoming messages and responds only to those messages including the unique device identifier assigned to its associated implantable device. Transceiver 155 preferably employs an encryption routine to ensure that messages sent to, or received from, the implantable device cannot be intercepted or forged.
Inductive circuit 156 is coupled to coil 163, and is configured to inductively couple with coil 84 of the implantable device to recharge battery 74 of the implantable device. In one embodiment, inductive circuit 156 is coupled to indicator 158, preferably a plurality of LEDs that light to indicate the extent of magnetic coupling between coils 163 and 84 (and thus quality of charging), thereby assisting in positioning handpiece 151 relative to the implantable device. In one preferred embodiment, inductive coils 84 and 163 are capable of establishing good coupling through a gap of 35 mm, when operating at a frequency of 315 kHz or less. In an embodiment in which implantable device includes optional infrared LED 83, charging and communication system 30 may include an optional infrared sensor (not shown) which detects that infrared light emitted by LED 83 and further assists in positioning handpiece 151 to optimize magnetic coupling between coils 163 and 84, thereby improving the energy transmission to the implantable device.
Controller 152 also may be configured to periodically communicate with the implantable device to retrieve temperature data generated by temperature sensor 78 and stored in memory 72 during inductive charging of battery 74. Controller 152 may include firmware to analyze the battery temperature, and to adjust the charging power supplied to inductive circuit 163 to maintain the temperature of the implantable device below a predetermined threshold, e.g., less than 2 degrees C. above body temperature. That threshold may be set to reduce thermal expansion of the battery and surrounding electronic and mechanical components, for example, to reduce thermal expansion of motor and gear pump components and to reduce the thermal strain applied to the seal between lower portion 92 of housing and upper housing 93. In a preferred embodiment, power supplied to inductive coil 163 is cycled between high power (e.g., 120 mA) and low power (e.g., 40 mA) charging intervals responsive to the measured temperature within the implantable device.
As discussed above with respect to inductive circuit 75 of the implantable device, inductive circuit 156 optionally may be configured to transfer additional power to motor 73 of the implantable device, via inductive circuit 75 and battery 74, in a “boost” mode or jogging mode to unblock the gear pump. In particular, if an alarm is transmitted to controller 152 that motor 73 is stalled, e.g., due to a block created by viscous fluid, the patient may be given the option of using input device 164 to apply an overvoltage to motor 73 from inductive circuit 75 for a predetermined time period to free the blockage. Alternatively, activating input device 164 may cause controller 152 to command processor 70 to execute a routine to jog or shake the gear pump by rapidly operating motor 74 in reverse and forward directions to disrupt the blockage. Because such modes of operation may employ higher energy consumption than expected during normal operation, inductive circuits 156 and 75 may be configured to supply the additional energy for such motor operation directly from the energy stored in battery 157, instead of depleting battery 74 of the implantable device.
Battery 157 preferably comprises a lithium ion or lithium polymer battery capable of long lasting operation, e.g., up to three years. Battery 157 has sufficient capacity to supply power to handpiece 151 to operate controller 152, transceiver 155, inductive circuit 156 and the associated electronics while disconnected from base 31 and during charging of the implantable device. In a preferred embodiment, battery 157 has sufficient capacity to fully recharge battery 74 of the implantable device from a depleted state in a period of about 2-4 hours. Battery 157 also should be capable of recharging within about 2-4 hours. It is expected that for daily operation moving 700 ml of fluid, battery 157 and inductive circuit 156 should be able to transfer sufficient charge to battery 74 via inductive circuit 75 to recharge the battery within about 30 minutes. Battery capacity preferably is supervised by controller 152 using a charge accumulator algorithm.
Referring again to
LEDs 168 are visible through the material of housing 165 when lit, and preferably are arranged in three rows of two LEDs each. During charging, the LEDs light up to display the degree of magnetic coupling between inductive coils 163 and 84, e.g., as determined by energy loss from inductive circuit 156, and may be used by the patient to accurately position handpiece 151 relative to the implantable device. Thus, for example, a low degree of coupling may correspond to lighting of only two LEDs, an intermediate degree of coupling with lighting of four LEDs, and a preferred degree of coupling being reflected by lighting of all six LEDs. Using this information, the patient may adjust the position of handpiece 151 over the area where implantable device is located to obtain a preferred position for the handpiece, resulting in the shortest recharging time. In one preferred embodiment, LEDs 168 are replaced with an analog bar display on display 167, which indicates the quality of charge coupling.
The Monitoring and Control System
Turning to
The computer running monitoring and control system software 180 preferably includes a data port, e.g., USB port or comparable wireless connection that permits handpiece 151 of the charging and communication system to be coupled via port 169. Alternatively, as discussed above, the computer may include a wireless card, e.g., conforming to the IEEE 802.11 standard, thereby enabling handpiece 151 to communicate wirelessly with the computer running software 180. As a further alternative, the charging and communication system may include telephony circuitry that automatically dials and uploads data, such as alarm data, from handpiece 151 to a secure website accessible by the patient's physician.
Main block 184 preferably consists of a main software routine that executes on the physician's computer, tablet or smartphone, and controls overall operation of the other functional blocks. Main block 184 enables the physician to download event data and alarm information stored on handpiece 151 to their computer, tablet or smartphone, and also permits control and monitoring software 180 to directly control operation of the implantable device when coupled to handpiece 151. Main block also enables the physician to upload firmware updates and configuration data to the implantable device.
Event Log block 182 is a record of operational data downloaded from the implantable device via the charging and communication system, and may include, for example, pump start and stop times, motor position, sensor data for the peritoneal cavity and bladder pressures, patient temperature, respiratory rate or fluid temperature, pump outlet pressure, humidity, pump temperature, battery current, battery voltage, battery status, and the like. The event log also may include the occurrence of events, such as pump blockage, operation in boost or jog modes, alarms or other abnormal conditions.
Data Download block 183 is a routine that handles communication with handpiece 151 to download data from volatile memory 154 after the handpiece is coupled to the computer running monitoring and control software 180. Data Download block 183 may initiates, either automatically or at the instigation of the physician via user interface block 185, downloading of data stored in the event log.
Configuration Setup block 184 is a routine that configures the parameters stored within nonvolatile memory 71 that control operation of the implantable device. The interval timing parameters may determine, e.g., how long the processor remains in sleep mode prior to being awakened to listen for radio communications or to control pump operation. The interval timing parameters may control, for example, the duration of pump operation to move fluid from the peritoneal cavity to the bladder and the interval between periodic tick movements that inhibit blockage of the implantable device and peritoneal and bladder catheters. Interval timing settings transmitted to the implantable device from monitoring and control software 180 also may determine when and how often event data is written to nonvolatile memory 71, and to configure timing parameters used by the firmware executed by processor 152 of handpiece 151 of the charging and communication system. Block 184 also may be used by the physician to configure parameters stored within nonvolatile memory 71 relating to limit values on operation of processor 70 and motor 73. These values may include minimum and maximum pressures at the peritoneal and bladder catheters, the maximum temperature differential during charging, times when the pump may and may not operate, etc. The limit values set by block 184 also configure parameters that control operation of processor 152 of handpiece 151.
Block 184 also may configure parameters store within nonvolatile memory 71 of the implantable device relating to control of operation of processor 70 and motor 73. These values may include target daily volumes of fluid to transport, volume of fluid to be transported per pumping session, motor speed and duration per pumping session. Block 184 also may specify the parameters of operation of motor 73 during boost mode of operation, when coupled to handpiece 151, and shake/jog modes of operation when the implantable device is run using battery 74 alone. Such parameters may include motor speed and voltage, duration/number of revolutions of the motor shaft when alternating between forward and reverse directions, etc.
User interface block 185 handles display of information retrieved from the monitoring and control system and implantable device via data download block 183, and presents that information in an intuitive, easily understood format for physician review. As described below with respect to
Alarm detection block 186 may include a routine for evaluating the data retrieved from the implantable device or charging and communication system, and flagging abnormal conditions for the physician's attention. For example, alarm detection block 186 may include health monitor block 191, which is configured to alert the physician to any changes in the patient's health that may warrant changing the volume, time, and/or frequency with which the DSR infusate is provided to the patient's peritoneal cavity. For example, if data provided by the implantable device 20 indicate a buildup of fluid in the peritoneal cavity, then the physician may increase the volume, time, and/or frequency with which the fluid is withdrawn from the patient's peritoneal cavity. Or, if data provided by the implantable device 20 indicate a relatively low volume of fluid, then the physician may decrease the volume, time, and/or frequency with which the fluid is withdrawn from the patient's peritoneal cavity.
Alarm detection block 186 also, or alternatively, may include decompensation prediction block 192, which is configured to predict or detect heart failure decompensation based on, for example, one or more of an increase in the accumulation of fluid in the patient's peritoneal cavity above a predefined threshold, an increase in the patient's respiratory rate above a predefined threshold, and/or an increase in the intraabdominal pressure above a predefined threshold. Such flags may be communicated to the physician by changing status indicators presented by user interface block 185, or by displaying to the physician specific information about increases in the patient's fluid accumulation, respiratory rate, or intraabdominal pressure via user interface block 185.
Sensor calibration block 187 may include a routines for testing or measuring drift, of sensors 70, 78-81 employed in the implantable device, e.g., due to aging or change in humidity. Block 187 may then compute offset values for correcting measured data from the sensors, and transmit that information to the implantable device for storage in nonvolatile memory 71. For example, pressure sensors 104a-104d may experience drift due to aging or temperature changes. Block 187 accordingly may compute offset values that are then transmitted and stored in the implantable device to account for such drift.
Firmware upgrade block 188 may comprise a routine for checking the version numbers of the processor or motor controller firmware installed on the implantable device and/or processor firmware on charging and communication system, and identify whether upgraded firmware exists. If so, the routine may notify the physician and permit the physician to download revised firmware to the implantable device for storage in nonvolatile memory 71 or to download revised firmware to the charging and communication system for storage in nonvolatile memory 153.
Device identifier block 189 consists of a unique identifier for the implantable device that is stored in nonvolatile memory 71 and a routine for reading that data when the monitoring and control system is coupled to the implantable device via the charging and communication system. As described above, the device identifier is used by the implantable device to confirm that wireless communications received from a charging and communication system are intended for that specific implantable device. Likewise, this information is employed by handpiece 151 of the charging and communication system in determining whether a received message was generated by the implantable device associated with that handpiece. Finally, the device identifier information is employed by monitoring and control software 180 to confirm that the handpiece and implantable device constitute a matched set.
Status information block 190 comprises a routine for interrogating implantable device, when connected via handpiece 151, to retrieve current status date from the implantable device, and/or handpiece 151. Such information may include, for example, battery status, the date and time on the internal clocks of the implantable device and handpiece, version control information for the firmware and hardware currently in use, and sensor data.
Referring now to
In
Alarm condition window 204e displays any changes in parameters that may indicate a change in the patient's health, such as the possible development of heart failure decompensation or an improvement or worsening of the patient's health (Blocks 191 and 192 in
Turning to
Referring now to
Session volume window 211a displays the current setting for the interval time between pumping sessions of the fluid that naturally accumulates in the peritoneal cavity, the times of the day that the pump may be activated, the total daily pump time and the session volume per pumping session. The dwell time displayed in window 211a allows the physician to set the amount of time that the DSR infusate is to remain in the peritoneal cavity. The interval time displayed in window 211a allows the physician to set the frequency with which the sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate are extracted from the peritoneal cavity and directed to the bladder (as well as the DSR infusate from the reservoir to the peritoneal cavity). The volume of DSR infusate delivered from the reservoir, dwell times and extraction times are used by the configuration setup routine (block 184 of
The time segments that the pump may be active, displayed in window 211a, optionally may be used define the timeframes during which the implantable device can actively move fluid to the bladder; outside of these time segments, the implantable device will not move fluid but may implement the pump tick operation described above to turn the gears on a regular basis to prevent clogging of the gears. Depending on the perceived health of the patient, the physician may set the time segments such that the pump may operate at all hours of the day or night, as preservation of health may override convenience in some circumstances. The daily pump time displayed in window 211a is shown in read-only format because it is the aggregate of the time segments entered in the time segments boxes. Finally, the session volume displayed in window 211a is computed by block 183 as the amount of fluid transferred to the bladder in a single pumping session.
Fluid transport program window 211b displays the status of the program controlling operation of the pump of the implantable device based on the parameters set using block 184 of software 180. In case pump activity must be stopped for any reason, the fluid transport program can be stopped by clicking the “Off” button in window 211b, which will cause the pump to stop pumping until it is manually switched back on. In one embodiment, the fluid transport program may switched on again by pressing the “On” button in window 211b. Because the implantable device preferably is implanted with the pump turned off, the physician or surgeon may use window 211b to turn on the fluid transport program after the implantable device is first implanted.
Minimum daily volume window 211c displays the expected amount of fluid to be pumped to the bladder by the implantable device, and is computed by the configuration setup routine as the session volume times the number of sessions per day, based on the length of the prescribed time segments and interval timing input in window 211a.
Pressure window 211d of
Referring now to
While various illustrative embodiments of the invention are described above, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention. For example, system 10 may be modified to include additional devices configured to assess the physical and/or mental health of the patient, such as weighing scales, ECG or heart-rate sensors or a hand-held biosensor that measures the levels of sodium and/or toxins and/or waste products, e.g., ammonia, c-reactive protein, plasma renin, serum sodium, serum creatinine, prothrombin time, and/or bilirubin, in a drop of the patient's blood. If coupled to sensor that measures serum creatinine, the system may be configured to calculate and store a current value of GFR using the equation set forth above. If so configured, the system could issue an alert to the physician to discontinue the use of no or low sodium DSR infusate if the GFR is computed to fall below 15.
Alternatively, or in addition, system 10 may be modified to include a hand-held or computer-based device that presents the patient with psychometric tests that measure the psychological health or electrophysiological activity of the subject. Such devices may be configured to wirelessly provide results to monitoring and control system 40 for the physician to use in assessing the patient's health and the possible need to adjust the operating parameters of implantable device 20. The appended claims are intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Preliminary Experimental Results
Initial testing of the DSR infusate and methods of the present invention has been conducted in a porcine model, which is expected to provide valid insights into how the inventive system, methods and DSR infusate will behave in humans. That initial testing has provided remarkably successful and beneficial results that far exceeded expectations, as described in further detail below.
In a first group of five pigs (“protocol refinement pigs”), the effect of infusing 1 liter of sodium-free DSR infusate into the peritoneal cavity of each pig was measured. The DSR infusate generally comprised purified water and dextrose, e.g., 10 grams per 100 ml of water, and was allowed to dwell in their peritoneal cavities for up to six hours. 5-25 micro curies of I-131 radiolabled albumin was mixed into the infusate as a non-absorbable tracer to determine ultrafiltration kinetics without requiring serial drains of the abdomen. Throughout the dwell period, the fluid in the peritoneal cavities was sampled to determine total sodium removed and sodium concentration in the fluid accumulating in the peritoneal cavity as a function of time, and blood samples were taken as well. Specifically, in the 1½ hours after infusion of the DSR infusate, 3 ml blood sample and 2.5 ml fluid samples were taken every 15 minutes and analyzed. In the next 1½ hour period, blood and fluid samples were taken every ½ hour. And in the final 3 hours, additional blood and fluid samples were taken every hour. In addition, the total volume of fluid accumulated in the peritoneal cavity, consisting of sodium-laden DSR infusate and osmotic ultrafiltrate, was recorded as a function of time.
In a second group of ten pigs (“protocol pigs”), 1 liter of DSR infusate was infused in the peritoneal cavities of each pig for a two hour dwell period. Throughout the dwell period serum sodium, serum osmolality, plasma osmolality and glucose levels of the pigs were periodically measured by taking 6 ml blood samples every ½ hour. Total osmolality, glucose osmolality and non-glucose osmolality of the fluid accumulating in the peritoneal cavities were periodically measured during the dwell period using the foregoing samples. After completion of the dwell period, the total volume of fluid drained from the peritoneal cavity and the total amount of sodium removed, was measured.
While various illustrative embodiments of the invention are described above, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention. For example, pump system 1 may be ordered differently and may include additional or fewer components of various sizes and composition. The appended claims are intended to cover all such changes and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/510,652, filed May 24, 2017, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3233610 | Charles et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3516410 | Hakim et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
| 3540451 | Zenman | Nov 1970 | A |
| 3575158 | Summers | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3608088 | Dorman et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3626950 | Schulte | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3642004 | Osthagen et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
| 3654932 | Newkirk et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3669116 | Heyer | Jun 1972 | A |
| 3810259 | Summers | May 1974 | A |
| 3910283 | Leveen | Oct 1975 | A |
| 4014346 | Brownlee et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4083786 | Tsuda et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4240434 | Newkirk | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4261341 | Hakim et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4347543 | Frister et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
| 4354933 | Lester | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4368737 | Ash | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4398910 | Blake et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4416657 | Berglund | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4418693 | Leveen et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4419094 | Patel | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4465481 | Blake | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4468219 | George et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4475898 | Brodner et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4475899 | Muller | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4490137 | Moukheibir | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4553956 | Muller | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4557724 | Gregonis et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4584994 | Bamberger et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4594631 | Iwaki | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4595390 | Hakim et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4610625 | Bunn | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4610658 | Buchwald et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4615691 | Hakim et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4618343 | Polaschegg | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4632435 | Polyak | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4650463 | Leveen et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4657530 | Buchwald et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4687471 | Twardowski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4690673 | Bloomquist | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4725207 | Buchwald et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4772257 | Hakim et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4779614 | Moise | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4784638 | Ghajar et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4850955 | Newkirk et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| D303840 | Weilbacher | Oct 1989 | S |
| 4880414 | Whipple | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4904236 | Redmont et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4950232 | Ruzicka et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4963129 | Rusch | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4963133 | Whipple | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4991594 | Angelchik | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5011472 | Aebischer et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5021048 | Buckholtz | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5037385 | O'Byrne | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5045057 | Van Driessche et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5057075 | Moncrief et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5071408 | Ahmed et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5078688 | Lobodzinski et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5141493 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5147281 | Thornton et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5167615 | East et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5180387 | Ghajar et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5254084 | Geary | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5356386 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5360414 | Yarger | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5385541 | Kirsch et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5387188 | Watson | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5387192 | Glantz et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5391143 | Kensey | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5395320 | Padda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5395350 | Summers | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5397354 | Wilk et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5431637 | Okada et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5472323 | Hirabayashi et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5474683 | Bryant et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5489276 | Jamshidi | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5520632 | Leveen et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5549579 | Batdorf et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5575770 | Melsky et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5589197 | Shockley et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593394 | Kanesaka et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5629025 | Shockley et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5631025 | Shockley et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5637083 | Bertrand et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5676670 | Kim | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5713864 | Verkaart | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725506 | Freeman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5788468 | Dewa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5830172 | Leveen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5902336 | Mishkin | May 1999 | A |
| 5944684 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947911 | Wong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5980478 | Gorsuch et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5980480 | Rubenstein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989207 | Hughes | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6007511 | Prywes | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6017355 | Hessel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| D420738 | Carter et al. | Feb 2000 | S |
| 6022333 | Kensey | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027442 | Von Iderstein | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6099513 | Spehalski | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6132405 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6132415 | Finch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146354 | Beil | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162238 | Kaplan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162487 | Darouiche | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6193684 | Burbank et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6214802 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6245039 | Brugger et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248726 | Alsop et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254567 | Treu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264601 | Jassawalla et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264625 | Rubenstein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6417750 | Sohn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6436087 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6478789 | Spehalski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6533733 | Ericson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6554822 | Holschneider et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6585681 | Brugger et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6613095 | Levin | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6648906 | Lasheras et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6656227 | Levin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6689085 | Rubenstein et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6814547 | Childers et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6827682 | Bugge et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846168 | Davis et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6854467 | Boekstegers | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6875192 | Saul et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6887214 | Levin et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6894456 | Tsukamoto et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6905474 | Borgesen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6911014 | Wentling et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6921378 | O'Keefe et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926691 | Miethke | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6939111 | Huitt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6945949 | Wilk | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6949080 | Wolf et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6953481 | Phelps et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6955655 | Burbank et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6960179 | Gura | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6964652 | Guiles et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966889 | Saab | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6974445 | Stergiopulos | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6976973 | Ruddell et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6979351 | Forsell et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6981964 | Rioux et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6986752 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994700 | Elkins et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011095 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7017340 | Chicky | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7025739 | Saul | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7025742 | Rubenstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7063679 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7128735 | Weston | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7169303 | Sullivan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7195608 | Burnett | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| D558338 | Itoh | Dec 2007 | S |
| D558341 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
| D558342 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
| 7311690 | Burnett | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7335179 | Burnett | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7419483 | Shehada | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7621886 | Burnett | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7670332 | O'Keefe et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7909790 | Burnett | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8012118 | Curtin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8202248 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8241239 | Solomon et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8394048 | Burnett | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8398577 | Burnett | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8517973 | Burnett | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8585635 | Degen et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8600517 | Forsell | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8612013 | Forsell | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8641659 | Soykan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8704484 | Rosik et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8771221 | Burnett | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8882699 | Burnett | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8961448 | Forsell | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8965523 | Forsell | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8992456 | Powell | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 9039652 | Degen et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9138521 | Solomon et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9138523 | Burnett et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9144660 | Degen | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9149613 | Degen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| D743542 | Degen | Nov 2015 | S |
| D743543 | Degen | Nov 2015 | S |
| 9339636 | Khan et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
| 9381301 | Lattanzio et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9421347 | Burnett | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9577459 | Degen et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9673527 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9675327 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9694165 | Forsell | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9808634 | Forsell | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9913968 | Burnett | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9956336 | Degen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10252037 | Degen et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 20010025170 | Paderni | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010027289 | Treu et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020013545 | Soltanpour et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020022793 | Bertrand et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091352 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107467 | Levin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020123715 | Sorenson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030114787 | Gura | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114898 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163079 | Burnett | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030171710 | Bassuk et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217962 | Childers et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220606 | Busby et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040018228 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049288 | Levin | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040098113 | Forsell et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106205 | Stevenson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040126775 | Altieri et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147871 | Burnett | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20050096582 | Burnett | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131340 | Sorenson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273034 | Burnett | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010014 | Brown | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060024200 | Nishikiori et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060036208 | Burnett | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058731 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060094984 | Wood et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070055197 | Shakir | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070106205 | Connell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208323 | Gregorich et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070228071 | Kamen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070233042 | Moehle et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255345 | Krause | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070299317 | Hoyme et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080024294 | Mazar | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080108935 | Nyhart, Jr. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080154173 | Burnett | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080214983 | Mauge et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080230450 | Burbank et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090054874 | Barron et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069642 | Gao et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090171241 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090198174 | Childers et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222065 | Dlugos, Jr. et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275805 | Lane et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275924 | Lattanzio et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318844 | Burnett | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010832 | Boute et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100022902 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100114012 | Sandford et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100185225 | Albrecht et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100215375 | Reams | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222846 | Goetz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100234793 | Dacey, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249692 | Dacey et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100270970 | Toya et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312163 | Forsell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312164 | Forsell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110025261 | Bersenev | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110034986 | Chou et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110163714 | Ettes et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172545 | Grudic et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184339 | Tan | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184340 | Tan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202041 | Forsell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110291613 | Rosik et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120032522 | Schatz et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120035255 | Fanelli et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120041279 | Freeman et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209085 | Degen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120209165 | Degen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235503 | Kesler et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120235634 | Hall et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130187619 | Dunipace | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130199998 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130211322 | Degen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130289334 | Badstibner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130303971 | Budgett et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130317476 | Searle et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005743 | Giuffrida et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140012180 | Levin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140066841 | Degen et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140074180 | Heldman et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140098627 | Mochizuki | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140121590 | Degen | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140200481 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140213966 | Ostapoff et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140266022 | Degen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275727 | Bonde et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140275827 | Gill et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150088090 | Macy, Jr. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20160000984 | Burnett et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160022971 | Degen et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160087687 | Kesler et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160151553 | Bonde | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160183819 | Burnett et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160303313 | Burke et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160331947 | Burnett | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170079760 | Newman et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170128654 | Feld | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170136221 | Budgett et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170173262 | Veltz | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281848 | Axelsson | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170304597 | Forsell | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180056050 | Degen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180060520 | Degen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180093081 | Forsell | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180243495 | Degen et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344917 | Inhaber et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190232029 | Degen et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20200054813 | Burnett et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101485683 | Jul 2009 | CN |
| 201930383 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 0 366 389 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0 980 685 | Feb 2000 | EP |
| 1 362 605 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 517 718 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 1 539 294 | Jun 2005 | EP |
| 1517718 | Oct 2010 | EP |
| 2 244 667 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2244662 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2244663 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2244758 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2244759 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 2244760 | Nov 2010 | EP |
| 1539294 | Jan 2011 | EP |
| 2 676 638 | Dec 2013 | EP |
| 2349473 | Dec 2016 | EP |
| 2676638 | Jul 2017 | EP |
| 3275505 | Jan 2018 | EP |
| 2054105 | Jul 2018 | EP |
| 2 350 794 | Dec 2000 | GB |
| S63143074 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| H04-327857 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| H0956810 | Mar 1997 | JP |
| 2000072658 | Mar 2000 | JP |
| 2000510552 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2004-513681 | May 2004 | JP |
| A2005-171892 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| 2005534400 | Nov 2005 | JP |
| 2006507018 | Mar 2006 | JP |
| 2010527247 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| WO-9741799 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO-9816171 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO-9934116 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO-0207596 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO-03072166 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004012806 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004105730 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005018708 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006023589 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2008055248 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2009091267 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO-2009096854 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO-2010077851 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| 2012078230 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO-2012112664 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2013122580 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013122580 | Aug 2013 | WO |
| WO-2013166038 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO-2014140277 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO-2015108782 | Jul 2015 | WO |
| WO-2018037359 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| François, et al., Peritoneal Dialysis For Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, Blood Purif., 40(1):45-52 (2015). |
| Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 24, 2018 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/IB2018/053587. |
| Nakayama, et al., Clinical Effect of Low Na Concentration Dialysate (120mEq/L) for CAPD Patients, Abstracts of the XIII Annual CAPD Conference, Peritoneal Dialysis International, vol. 13, Supplement 1, 1993. |
| Puttagunta, et al., Peritoneal Dialysis For Heart Failure, Peritoneal Dialysis International, 35(6):645-649 (2015. |
| Ruhi, et al., Use of Peritoneal Ultrafiltration in the Elderly Refractory Congestive Heart Failure Patients, Int. Urol. and Nephrol., 44(3):963-969 (2012). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,447, filed Sep. 16, 2015, Burnett et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,187, filed Oct. 2, 2015, Degen et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/965,727, filed Apr. 27, 2018, Degen et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/985,617, filed May 21, 2018, Inhaber et al. |
| Bellot, Pablo, et al., Automated low flow pump system for the treatment of refractory ascites: A multi-center safety and efficacy study, Journal of Hepatology, 58(5):922-927 (2013). |
| Costanzo et al., “Early Ultrafiltration in Patients with Decompensated Heart Failure and Diuretic Resistance,” J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., (2005), vol. 46(11):2047-2051. |
| Fukuda, et al., Survivin, a cancer target with an emerging role in normal adult tissues, Mol. Cancer Ther., 5(5):1087-1098 (2006). |
| Hecking, et al., Sodium Setpoint and Sodium Gradient: Influence on Plasma Sodium Change And Weight Gain, Am J. Nephrol, 33(1):39-48 (2011). |
| Houlberg et al., “Terminal Right Heart Failure Due to Complex Congenital Cardiac Disease Successfully Managed by Home Peritoneal Drainage,” Cardiol. Young, 13(6):568-70 (2003). |
| International Search Report dated Sep. 16, 2008 in Int'l PCT Appl. Serial No. PCT/US2005/029305. |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 in Int'l PCT Appl. Serial No. PCT/US2012/025188. |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2018 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/IB2017/055092. |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 16, 2015 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. Serial No. PCT/US2015/010840. |
| Partial International Search dated Dec. 8, 2017 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/IB17/55093. |
| Mc Causland, et al., Dialysate sodium, serum sodium and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant, 27:1613-1618 (2012). |
| Medtronic Reveal LinqTM LNQ11, Insertable Cardiac Monitor, Clinician Manual, 98 pages (2015). |
| Munoz Mendoza, et al., Dialysate sodium and sodium gradient in maintenance hemodialysis: a neglected sodium restriction approach? Nephrol Dial Transplant, 26(4):1281-1287 (2011). |
| Ortiz et al., “Long-Term Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Refractory Congestive Heart Failure,” Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, (2003), vol. 19:77-80. |
| Rosenblit, et al., Peritoneal-Urinary Drainage for Treatment of Refractory Ascites: A Pilot Study, J. Vascular & Interv. Radiology, 9(6):998-1005 (1998). |
| Smyth, “Pump implant for cancer patients ‘is a game-changer’ for thousands”, The Times, Health News, p. 11, Jan. 18, 2013. |
| www.medtronic.com/us-en/patients/treatments-therapies/fainting-heart-monitor/reveal-linq-icm.html (May 2017) (Accessed Nov. 27, 2017). |
| Zepeda-Orozco, et al., Dialysis Disequilibrium Syndrome, Pediatr. Nephrol, 27:2205-2211 (2012). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/369,550 / U.S. Pat. No. 7,335,179, filed Feb. 21, 2003 / Feb. 26, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/700,863 / U.S. Pat. No. 7,311,690, filed Nov. 3, 2003 / Dec. 26, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/826,237 / U.S. Pat. No. 7,909,790, filed Apr. 17, 2004 / Mar. 22, 2011. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/922,478 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,202,248, filed Aug. 18, 2004 / Jun. 19, 2012. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/181,539 / U.S. Pat. No. 7,621,886, filed Jul. 13, 2005 / Nov. 24, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/198,079 / U.S. Pat. No. 7,195,608, filed Aug. 4, 2005 / Mar. 27, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/933,214 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,398,577, filed Oct. 31, 2007 / Mar. 19, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/014,696 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,394,048, filed Jan. 15, 2008 / Mar. 12, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/029,069 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,517,973, filed Feb. 16, 2011 / Aug. 27, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,498 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,585,635, filed Feb. 15, 2012 / Nov. 19, 2013. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,509 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,149,613, filed Feb. 15, 2012 / Oct. 6, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/397,523 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,039,652, filed Feb. 15, 2012 / May 26, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/473,516 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,138,523, filed May 16, 2012 / Sep. 22, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,543 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,144,660, filed Oct. 31, 2013 / Sep. 29, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/789,250 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,771,221, filed Mar. 7, 2013 / Jul. 8, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/831,642 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,577,459, filed Mar. 15, 2013 / Feb. 21, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,981 / U.S. Pat. No. 8,882,699, filed Aug. 22, 2013 / Nov. 11, 2014. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,984 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,421,347, filed Aug. 22, 2013 / Aug. 23, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/077,005 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,956,336, filed Nov. 11, 2013 / May 1, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/155,079 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,673,527, filed Jan. 14, 2014 / Jun. 13, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,447, filed Sep. 16, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,187, filed Oct. 2, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/220,812 / U.S. Pat. No. 9,913,968, filed Jul. 27, 2016 / Mar. 13, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/249,192, filed Aug. 26, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,479, filed Aug. 23, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/965,727, filed Apr. 27, 2018. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/985,617, filed May 21, 2018. |
| Second Written Opinion dated May 16, 2019 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/IB2018/053587. |
| D Greitz, et al., Pulsatile Brain Movement and Associated Hydrodynamics Studied by Magnetic Resonance Phase Imaging, Diagnostic Neuroradiology, 34(5): 370-380 (1992). |
| Doty, et al., Effect of Increased Renal Venous Pressure on Renal Function, J. Trauma., 47(6):1000-1003 (1999). |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jun. 6, 2012 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP05786343.3, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 18, 2019 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. 19172235.4. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 14, 2011 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP11172759.0, 6 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 26, 2011 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP07844792.7, 6 pages. |
| Houlberg, et al., Terminal Right Heart Failure Due to Complex Congenital Cardiac Disease Successfully Managed by Home Peritoneal Drainage, Cardiol. Young, 9(6):998-1005, (2003). |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Jul. 3, 2012 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl No. PCT/US12/25212, 34 pages. |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Apr. 15, 2008 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl No. PCT/US07/83261, 6 pages. |
| International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Sep. 28, 2005 in Int'l PCT Patent Appl No. PCT/US04/26781, 4 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2018 in Intl PCT Patent Appl. No. PCT/162017/055093. |
| International Search Report dated Jul. 17, 2003, PCT/US03/05145, 3 pages. |
| Kenny., Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Renal Function: the Venous Side of the Road, PulmCCM, Critical Carer, Gi and Nutrition, Jul. 14, 2016, accessed on line on Mar. 27, 2017 at http://pulmccm.org/main/2016/critical-care-review/intra-abdominal-pressur-e-renal-function/. |
| Neragi-Miandoab., Malignant Pleural Effusion, Current and Evolving Approaches for its Diagnosis and Management, Lung Cancer 54:1-9(2006). |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 19, 2014 in PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/055104. |
| Sort, et al., Effect of Intravenous Albumin on Renal Impairment and Mortality in Patients with Cirrhosis and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, The New England Journal of Medicine, 341(6):403-409 (Aug. 5, 1999). |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Jun. 4, 2010 in EP Patent Appl. Serial No. EP03719316.6, 3 pages. |
| Tan et al., The Evidence on the Effectiveness of Management for Malignant Pleural Effusion: A Systematic Review, European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 29, 2006 (pp. 829-838). |
| Warren, et al., Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions Using the Pleurx Catheter, Ann. Thrac. Sur. 85, 2008, (pp. 1049-1055). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180338914 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62510652 | May 2017 | US |
