This disclosure pertains to attainment of high brightness in wide viewing angle reflective image displays of the type described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,999,307; 6,064,784; 6,215,920; 6,865,011; 6,885,496; 6,891,658; 7,164,536; 7,286,280 and 8,040,591; all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
An electrophoresis medium 20 is maintained adjacent the portions of beads 14 which protrude inwardly from material 16 by containment of medium 20 within a reservoir 22 defined by lower sheet 24. An inert, low refractive index (i.e. less than about 1.35), low viscosity, electrically insulating liquid such as Fluorinert™ perfluorinated hydrocarbon liquid (η1˜1.27) available from 3M, St. Paul, Minn. is a suitable electrophoresis medium. Other liquids, or water can also be used as electrophoresis medium 20. A bead:liquid TIR interface is thus formed. Medium 20 contains a finely dispersed suspension of light scattering and/or absorptive particles 26 such as pigments, dyed or otherwise scattering/absorptive silica or latex particles, etc. Sheet 24's optical characteristics are relatively unimportant: sheet 24 need only form a reservoir for containment of electrophoresis medium 20 and particles 26, and serve as a support for backplane electrode 48.
As is well known, the TIR interface between two media having different refractive indices is characterized by a critical angle θc. Light rays incident upon the interface at angles less than θc are transmitted through the interface. Light rays incident upon the interface at angles greater than θc undergo TIR at the interface. A small critical angle is preferred at the TIR interface since this affords a large range of angles over which TIR may occur.
In the absence of electrophoretic activity, as is illustrated to the right of dashed line 28 in
A voltage can be applied across medium 20 via electrodes 46 and 48 which can for example be applied by vapour-deposition to the inwardly protruding surface portion of beads 14 and to the outward surface of sheet 24. Electrode 46 is transparent and substantially thin to minimize its interference with light rays at the bead:liquid TIR interface. Backplane electrode 48 need not be transparent. If electrophoresis medium 20 is activated by actuating voltage source 50 to apply a voltage between electrodes 46 and 48 as illustrated to the left of dashed line 28, suspended particles 26 are electrophoretically moved adjacent the surface of the monolayer of beads 18 into the region where the evanescent wave is relatively intense (i.e. within 0.25 micron of the inward surfaces of inwardly protruding beads 14, or closer). When electrophoretically moved as aforesaid, particles 26 scatter or absorb light, thus frustrating or modulating TIR by modifying the imaginary and possibly the real component of the effective refractive index at the bead:liquid TIR interface. This is illustrated by light rays 52 and 54 which are scattered and/or absorbed as they strike particles 26 inside the thin (˜0.5 μm) evanescent wave region at the bead:liquid TIR interface, as indicated at 56 and 58 respectively, thus achieving a “dark” appearance in each TIR-frustrated non-reflective absorption region or pixel. Particles 26 need only be moved outside the thin evanescent wave region, by suitably actuating voltage source 50, in order to restore the TIR capability of the bead:liquid TIR interface and convert each “dark” non-reflective absorption region or pixel to a “white” reflection region or pixel.
As described above, the net optical characteristics of outward sheet 12 can be controlled by controlling the voltage applied across medium 20 via electrodes 46 and 48. The electrodes can be segmented to control the electrophoretic activation of medium 20 across separate regions or pixels of sheet 12, thus forming an image.
Now consider incident light ray 68 which is perpendicularly incident (through material 16) on hemi-bead 60 at a distance
from hemi-bead 60's center C. Ray 68 encounters the inward surface of hemi-bead 60 at the critical angle θc (relative to radial axis 70), the minimum required angle for TIR to occur. Ray 68 is accordingly totally internally reflected, as ray 72, which again encounters the inward surface of hemi-bead 60 at the critical angle θc. Ray 72 is accordingly totally internally reflected, as ray 74, which also encounters the inward surface of hemi-bead 60 at the critical angle θc. Ray 74 is accordingly totally internally reflected, as ray 76, which passes perpendicularly through hemi-bead 60 into the embedded portion of bead 14 and into material 16. Ray 68 is thus reflected back as ray 76 in a direction approximately opposite that of incident ray 68.
All light rays which are incident on hemi-bead 60 at distances a≥ac from hemi-bead 60's center C are reflected back (but not exactly retro-reflected) toward the light source; which means that the reflection is enhanced when the light source is overhead and slightly behind the viewer, and that the reflected light has a diffuse characteristic giving it a white appearance, which is desirable in reflective display applications.
In
Display 10 has relatively high apparent brightness, comparable to that of paper, when the dominant source of illumination is behind the viewer, within a small angular range. This is illustrated in
where η1 is the refractive index of hemi-bead 60 and η3 is the refractive index of the medium adjacent the surface of hemi-bead 60 at which TIR occurs. Thus, if hemi-bead 60 is formed of a lower refractive index material such as polycarbonate (η1˜1.59) and if the adjacent medium is Fluorinert (η3˜1.27), a reflectance R of about 36% is attained, whereas if hemi-bead 60 is formed of a high refractive index nano-composite material (η1˜1.92) a reflectance R of about 56% is attained. When illumination source S (
As shown in
The reflective, white annular region 80 surrounding the non-reflective, dark circular region 82 presents a problem commonly referred to as the “dark pupil” problem which reduces the reflectance of the display. The display's performance is further reduced by transparent electrode 46, which may be formed by provision of a transparent conductive coating on hemi-beads 14. Such coatings typically absorb about 5% to 10% of the incident light. Since a light ray typically reflects several times, this can make it difficult to achieve efficient reflection. A further related problem is that it can be expensive and challenging to apply such a coating to a contoured hemispherical surface.
The dark pupil problem can be addressed by reflecting back toward hemi-beads 14 (i.e. “recycling”) light rays which pass through the non-reflective, dark circular region 82 of any of hemi-beads 14. An approach to solving this problem and enhancing the brightness of the display is to equip the display with a reflective component to reflect the light back through the pupil and towards the viewer.
An electrophoresis medium 108 is contained within the reservoir or cavity formed between the portions of beads 104 which protrude inwardly from material 102 and the lower or rear sheet 110. On the inward surface of the rear sheet 110 is an electrode layer 111. The medium 108 is an inert, low refractive index, low viscosity liquid such as a fluorinated hydrocarbon. Other liquids may also be used as electrophoresis medium 108. A bead:liquid TIR interface is thus formed. Medium 108 further contains a finely dispersed suspension of light absorbing, electrophoretically mobile particles 112.
In the absence of electrophoretic activity, as is illustrated to the left of dashed line 114 in
When a voltage is applied across medium 108, as is illustrated to the right of dashed line 114 in the prior art depicted in
As described in the preceding paragraphs, the porous reflective membrane's purpose is to reflect the light that passes through the dark pupil of the hemi-beads 116 back through the pupil region of the hemi-beads 116 and towards the viewer to enhance the brightness of the display as depicted in
The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related thereto are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than restrictive.
Throughout the following description specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding to persons skilled in the art. However, well known elements may not have been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the disclosure. Accordingly, the description and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative, rather than a restrictive, sense.
Display 200 depicted in
As depicted in
As mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, the metal:membrane structure is porous, enabling light absorbing electrophoretically mobile particles 214 to readily move through apertures 224 that penetrate both the membrane 216 and metal layer 220, as display 200's pixels are selectively switched between the light reflecting state (
In the light reflecting state shown in
Some incident light rays, such as representative light ray 234, are refracted through surface 204 and hemispherically-contoured surface 202 but do not undergo TIR at the bead:liquid TIR interface. Instead, ray 234 passes through hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and is reflected outwardly by metal layer 220 toward surface 202 and the viewer. The reflected ray is then refracted back through the pupil region of hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and sheet 204 and emerges as ray 236, again achieving a “white” appearance and improving the brightness of display 200.
Some other incident light rays, such as representative ray 238, are “lost” in the sense that they do not emerge outwardly from display 200. For example, ray 238 is refracted through surface 204 and hemispherically-contoured surface 202, but does not undergo TIR at the bead:liquid TIR interface and is not reflected by metal layer 220. Instead, ray 238 passes through one of membrane 204's apertures 224 and is absorbed, for example, at an inner wall portion of the aperture, as shown in
A switchable voltage (i.e. electric field) can be applied across electrophoresis medium 212 via electrodes 208 and 220 as indicated in
Another factor to consider is the appropriate relative spacing and alignment of transparent outward sheet 204, membrane:metal layer and rear electrode layer 208 can be achieved by providing loose or attached spacer beads and/or spacers (not shown) or a combination thereof on sheet 204, on rear electrode layer 208 or on the membrane:metal layer or combinations thereof. The spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and metal layer 220 atop membrane 216 is at least about 2 microns. More preferably the spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and metal layer 220 atop membrane 216 is about 4 microns to about 6 microns. The spacing between the rear backplane electrode 208 and the bottom of membrane 216 facing the backplane electrode 208 is at least about 10 microns. More preferably the spacing between the rear backplane electrode 208 and the bottom of membrane 216 facing the backplane electrode 208 is about 30 microns to about 50 microns. The spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and backplane electrode surface 208 that forms the reservoir cavity 210 is overall at least about 25 microns and more preferably about 30 microns to about 80 microns. In addition to the diameter of the apertures, da, and the spacing between the micron centers, dmc, display 200's switching speed is further dependent on the time required for particles 214 to move throughout the display as it is switched between the non-reflective and reflective states. Thus, the spacing distance between the various layers of the display is critical.
The reflectance of the surface is defined as the ratio of the luminance of the display to the luminance of a diffuse white reflectance standard (typically having a perfectly diffuse, or Lambertian, reflectance of 98%) measured using the same technique and under the same illumination conditions. The reflectance of a surface that exhibits semi-retro-reflective characteristics depends on the nature of the illumination conditions. If the surface is viewed in a perfectly diffuse illumination environment, there will be no apparent increase in reflectance caused by the semi-retro-reflective characteristics. In contrast, if the surface is viewed in an illumination environment that is not perfectly diffuse, a surface that exhibits semi-retro-reflective characteristics may have an apparent increase in reflectance. Such a lighting environment as shown in
In another embodiment where a higher switching speed, for example, is preferred, each hemisphere in hemispherically-contoured surface 202 may have a diameter of about 5 microns. Membrane:metal layer structure is substantially a flat sheet about 10 microns thick with the membrane being a thickness of about 10 microns while the metal layer a thickness of about 0.10 microns. The membrane:metal layer is perforated with about 12 micron diameter apertures 224 spaced on roughly 20 micron centers, such that the area fraction of apertures 224 on the membrane:metal layer structure is about 16%. The spacing between the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and the metal layer 220 on the membrane:metal layer is about 10 microns while the spacing between the bottom of the membrane layer 216 and top surface of the rear electrode layer 208 is about 30 microns making the total distance from the hemispherically-contoured surface 202 and rear electrode surface about 50 microns. In this embodiment, approximately 84% of the light rays incident on metal layer 220 do not encounter one of apertures 224 and are reflected by metal layer 220. If the metal has a reflectance of approximately 80% as a result of approximately 20% absorption (such as is the case for a reflective layer of aluminum), then the membrane:metal layer will have an overall reflectance of approximately 67% (i.e. 80% reflection of 84% of the light rays incident on the membrane:metal layer. It should be noted that not only speed and brightness should be considered when factoring in the diameter, da, of the apertures 224 and the spacing of the apertures, dmc, but also the structural rigidity and stability of the resulting porous membrane:metal layer. The more porous a structure is the weaker it may become unless a thicker membrane is used or alternative and potentially more costly materials are to be used.
In the reflective state, shown in
In the display embodiments described herein, they may be used in applications such as in, but not limited to, electronic book readers, portable computers, tablet computers, wearables, cellular telephones, smart cards, signs, watches, shelf labels, flash drives and outdoor billboards or outdoor signs.
Embodiments described above illustrate but do not limit this disclosure. While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. Accordingly, the scope of this disclosure is defined only by the following claims.
This application claims priority to the filing date of PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US14/30966 (filed Mar. 18, 2014), which claims priority to Provisional Patent Application 61/805,391 filed on Mar. 26, 2013.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/030966 | 3/18/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/160552 | 10/2/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3792308 | Ota et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3919031 | White | Nov 1975 | A |
4025674 | Mizuochi | May 1977 | A |
4071430 | Liebert | Jan 1978 | A |
4203106 | Dalisa et al. | May 1980 | A |
4648956 | Marhsall et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4821092 | Noguchi | Apr 1989 | A |
5019748 | Appelberg | May 1991 | A |
5319491 | Selbrede | Jun 1994 | A |
5359346 | DiSanto et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5396350 | Beeson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5596671 | Rockwell, III | Jan 1997 | A |
5751008 | Jung et al. | May 1998 | A |
5871653 | Ling | Feb 1999 | A |
5959777 | Whitehead | Sep 1999 | A |
5999307 | Whitehead et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6064784 | Whitehead et al. | May 2000 | A |
6215920 | Whitehead et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6304365 | Whitehead et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6376828 | Comiskey | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377383 | Whitehead et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384979 | Whitehead et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6437921 | Whitehead | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452734 | Whitehead et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6574025 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6822783 | Matsuda et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842279 | Amundson | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865011 | Whitehead et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885496 | Whitehead et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6891658 | Whitehead et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7046439 | Kaminsky et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7093968 | Hsueh et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7164536 | Whitehead | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170670 | Webber | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7259744 | Arango et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7286280 | Whitehead et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7324263 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7422964 | Akiyama | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7439948 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454103 | Parriaux | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7463398 | Feenstra | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7507012 | Aylward et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515326 | Ibrede et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7564614 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7660509 | Bryan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7740387 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760417 | Whitehead | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7775700 | Lee | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7852430 | Gettmey | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7940457 | Jain et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8022615 | Bai et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8040591 | Whitehead | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8094364 | Park | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8179034 | Potts | May 2012 | B2 |
8384659 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8587512 | Hiji et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8690408 | Li | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9360696 | Ghali et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9377574 | Li | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20020089735 | Albert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020171910 | Pullen et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030038755 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030067666 | Kawai | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030165016 | Whitehead et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030214697 | Duthaler et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040136047 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174584 | Whitehead et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040239613 | Kishi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007000 | Chou et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050270439 | Weber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060056009 | Kombrekke et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060148262 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209418 | Whitehead | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060291034 | Patry et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008739 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019434 | Lee | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070047003 | Suwabe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070091434 | Garner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070263137 | Shigeta et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080174852 | Hirai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203910 | Reynolds | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204854 | Whitehead et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219024 | Mi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231960 | Van Gorkom et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080266245 | Wilcox | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266646 | Wilcox | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285282 | Karman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297496 | Watson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303994 | Jeng et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080304134 | Ban | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090109172 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090201565 | Bita et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090201570 | Frazier et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207476 | Yanagisawa et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090225398 | Duthaler et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090231714 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090262083 | Parekh | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262414 | Whitehead | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322669 | Bryning et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100079843 | Derichs et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085627 | Whitehead | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091224 | Cho et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118383 | Van Abeelen et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100148385 | Balko et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100172016 | Park et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100225575 | Ishii et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253711 | Muroi | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110043435 | Hebenstreit et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110085232 | Werner et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110273906 | Nichol et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110279442 | Hale et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299014 | Jang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310465 | Takanashi | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316764 | Parry-Jones et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008203 | Ijzerman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019896 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120019899 | Yeo | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120026576 | Bita et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120069064 | Yamakita | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081777 | Heikenfeld et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113367 | Kitson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113499 | Komatsu | May 2012 | A1 |
20120262496 | Swic | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120293857 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130135320 | Govil | May 2013 | A1 |
20130182311 | Mochizuki et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130278995 | Drzaic et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130334972 | Atkins | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140333989 | Whitehead | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140340376 | Itagaki et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150146273 | Whitehead | May 2015 | A1 |
20160097961 | Whitehead | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160139478 | Whitehead | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147128 | Loxley et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
333109 | Aug 2006 | AT |
2292441 | Jul 2002 | CA |
2371138 | Jul 2005 | CA |
2410955 | Jan 2007 | CA |
2474384 | Aug 2010 | CA |
2643808 | Aug 2013 | CA |
1173208 | Oct 2004 | CN |
101160547 | Apr 2008 | CN |
1454327 | Sep 2008 | CN |
102955318 | Mar 2013 | CN |
69825894 | Sep 2005 | DE |
1118039 | Feb 2003 | EP |
0988573 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1290486 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1368700 | Jul 2006 | EP |
2004085635 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2007505330 | Mar 2007 | JP |
3965115 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007279641 | Oct 2007 | JP |
4113843 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2009251215 | Oct 2009 | JP |
4956610 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2005519329 | Jun 2017 | JP |
100949412 | Mar 2010 | KR |
2003075085 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2005010604 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2006108285 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006114743 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2014146937 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015116913 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2015175518 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2016130720 | Aug 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 8, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/049606. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 30, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/058118. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 11, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/030966. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 19, 2014 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/038091. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 1, 2015 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/030349. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 3, 2015 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/061911. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 13, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/066980. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/017416. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 1, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/013725. |
nternational Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 27, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/054385. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 2, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/062075. |
Mossman, M. A. et al., “A Novel Reflective Image Display Using Total Internal Reflection” Displays Devices, Dempa Publications, Tokyo JP vol. 25, No. 5 Dec. 1, 2004 pp. 215-221. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2016 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/0066150. |
Gou, S. et al., “Transparent Superhydrophobic Surfaces for Applications of Controlled Reflectance” Applied Optics vol. 51, Issue No. 11, Apr. 10, 2012, pp. 1645-1653. |
Whitehead, L. et al., “The Many Roles of Illumination in Information Display” Society for Information Display Symposium (Invited Paper), Issue No. 0097-966X/06/3701-0000, May 2010. |
Wong, R. et al., “Electrochemical Threshold Conditions During Electro-Optical Switching of Ionic Electrophorectic Optical Devices” Applied Optics vol. 48, Issue No. 6, Feb. 20, 2009, pp. 1062-1072. |
Whitehead, L. et al., “Reflections on Total Internal Reflection” Optics and Photonics News Feb. 2009, pp. 28-34. |
Mossman, M. et al., “Observations of Total Internal Reflection at a Natural Super-Hydrophobic Surface” Physics in Canada vol. 64, Issue No. 1, Mar. 2008, pp. 7-11. |
Hrudey, P. et al., “Application of Transparent Nanostructured Electrodes for Modulation of Total Internal Reflection” SPIE 2007 Conference Paper No. 6647 Aug. 2007, pp. 1-12. |
Hrudey, P. et al., “Variable Diffraction Gratings Using Nanoporous Electrodes and Electrophoresis of Dye Ions” SPIE 2007 Conference Paper No. 6645 Aug. 2007, pp. 1-12. |
Webster, A. et al., “Control of Reflection at an Optical Interface in the Absence of Total Internal Reflection for a Retroreflective Display Application” Applied Optics vol. 45, Issue No. 6, Feb. 20, 2006, pp. 1169-1176. |
Mossman, M. et al., “Off the Beaten Path with Total Internal Reflection” International Optical Design Conference (Invited Paper), Jun. 2006, pp. 1-12. |
Whitehead, L. et al., “Total Internal Reflection for Illumination and Displays” SPIE Newsroom Sep. 7-8, 2006. |
Mossman, M. et al., “Controlled Frustration of TIR by Electrophoresis of Pigment Particles” Applied Optics vol. 14, Issue No. 9, Mar. 20, 2005, pp. 1601-1609. |
Kwong, V. et al., “Control of Reflectance of Liquid Droplets by Means of Electrowetting” Applied Optics vol. 43, Issue No. 4, Feb. 1, 2004, pp. 808-813. |
Mossman, M. et al. “A High Reflectance, Wide Viewing Angle Reflective Display Using Total Internal Reflection in Mirco-Hemispheres” International Display Research Conference, Issue No. 1083-1312/00/2003-0233, Sep. 2003, pp. 233-236. |
Mossman, M. et al., “Grey Scale Control of Total Internal Reflection Using Electrophoresis of Sub-Optical Pigment Particles” International Conference of the Society for Information Display, Boston, MA Issue No. 2-0966X/02/3301-0522, May 2002, pp. 522-525. |
Coope, R. et al., “Modulation of Retroreflection by Controlled Frustration of Total Internal Reflection” Applied Optics vol. 41, Issue No. 25, Sep. 1, 2002, pp. 5357-5361. |
Mossman, M. et al., “New Method for Maintaining Long Term Image Quality in a TIR Based Electrophoretic Display” International Display Research Conference, Nice, France, EURODISPLAY Oct. 2002, pp. 851-854. |
Mossman, M. et al., “New Reflective Color Display Technique Based on Total Internal Reflection and Subtractive color Filtering” International Conference of the Society for Information Display, San Jose, CA Issue No. 1-0966X/01/3201-1054, Jun. 2001, pp. 1054-1057. |
Whitehead, L. et al., “Visual Applications of Total Internal Reflection in Prismatic Microstructures” Physics in Canada Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 329-335. |
Mossman, M. et al., “A New Reflective Display Based on Total Internal Reflection in Prismatic Microstructures” Proceedings of the 2000 Society for Information Display, International Display Research Conference, Issue No. 1083-1312/00/2001-0311, Oct. 2000, pp. 311-314. |
Mossman et al. “Brightness Enhancement in TIR-Modulated Electrophoretic Reflective Image Displays”, (Biblio). |
Atsuhito et al. “Electrophoresis Device, Method of Manufacturing the Electrophoresis Device, Display, Display Substrate, and Electronic Unit”, (Abstract). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160139478 A1 | May 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61805391 | Mar 2013 | US |