Aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to different assemblies, and more specifically, to assemblies that include a backplane and to assemblies that include a backplane as well as arrays of other elements to form a display.
One overlooked aspect in many displays is the backplane technology used to drive the pixels of the main display panel (e.g., array of individual pixels and/or optical elements). The backplane is a design, assembly, or arrangement of various circuits and/or transistors that are responsible for turning the individual pixels on and off in the display panel, and therefore playing an important role in the overall display resolution, refresh rate, and power consumption.
A current challenge is to make backplanes that are highly integrated and that can be assembled or packaged with light emitting elements (e.g., light emitting diodes or LEDs) or light reflecting elements as well as optical elements. Packaging techniques for integrated optical and electronics elements continue to improve from those used in traditional packaging. For example, there are improved techniques for wafer level chip scale packaging (WLCSP) and for fan-out wafer-level packaging. Moreover, the dimensionality of the packaging has also improved to enable even denser solutions. Packaging has gone from one dimensional (1D) packaging where there is one chip per package, to 2D packaging (e.g., multiple chips per packaging), to 2.5D packaging with an interposer, and to 3D packaging with chip stacking. Even with all the improvements these techniques provide, they may not be able to meet the requirements for the types of assemblies needed in high resolution displays, including light field displays.
Accordingly, new techniques are desirable that enable the design and fabrication of assemblies having backplanes and assemblies having backplanes combined with arrays of other elements that form a display.
The following presents a simplified summary of one or more aspects in order to provide a basic understanding of such aspects. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated aspects and is intended to neither identify key or critical elements of all aspects nor delineate the scope of any or all aspects. Its purpose is to present some concepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
In an aspect of the disclosure, a backplane for controlling light provided by a display is described. The backplane includes a plurality of tiles formed into an array, where each tile includes a plurality of complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) backplane dies, and where edges of the tiles forming an outer perimeter of the array include electrical connectors that direct electrical signals to at least one of the CMOS backplane dies.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a display assembly is described. The display assembly includes a backplane having an array of tiles, each tile having a plurality of electrically coupled CMOS backplane dies. Edges of the tiles forming an outer perimeter of the array include electrical connections directing electrical signals to one or more of the plurality of CMOS backplane dies. The display assembly further includes at least one light emitting diode (LED) array electrically coupled with at least one tile.
The appended drawings illustrate only some implementation and are therefore not to be considered limiting of scope.
The detailed description set forth below in connection with the appended drawings is intended as a description of various configurations and is not intended to represent the only configurations in which the concepts described herein may be practiced. The detailed description includes specific details for the purpose of providing a thorough understanding of various concepts. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that these concepts may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well known components are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring such concepts.
The number of pixels in future displays is expected to be much greater than in current displays, sometimes orders of magnitude greater. Such displays will present challenges in the type of backplane assemblies or display assemblies that are ultimately used, particularly in terms of power consumption and overall bandwidth, as these factors may limit the ability to implement displays with very high resolution and extremely large pixel count. Aspects to consider in determining an appropriate backplane or display assembly include the different technology options as well as the different integration options. As used herein, the terms “backplane” and “backplane assembly” may be used interchangeably. Similarly, the terms “display” and “display assembly” may be used interchangeably. Moreover, in some implementations, a “display” or “display assembly” may include a “backplane” or “backplane assembly.”
With respect to the technology options, various possible semiconductor technologies may be considered, including amorphous silicon (a-Si), metal oxides, low temperature polysilicon (LTPS), and complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) wafer, for example. Of these semiconductor technologies, LTPS and CMOS wafers may offer more flexible options for purposes of backplane bandwidth and density requirements. For example, CMOS wafers can support bandwidths in the range of 1 MHz-1,000 MHz and driver cell pitch in the range 1 μm-30 μm. On the other hand, LTPS can support bandwidths in the range of 1 MHz-15 MHz and driver cell pitch in the range 10 μm-10,000 μm.
An LTPS backplane design may involve a fabrication process flow that provides low cost and the fewest bonded interfaces. However, custom die placement tools capable of servicing large areas with high accuracy would be required. In some instances, LTPS may not be able to provide sufficient performance in terms of placement area and accuracy.
As described in this disclosure, a CMOS backplane design may be implemented using a panel level packaging (PLP) approach or alternatively, using wafer tiles as part of a wafer level packaging (WLP) approach. The PLP approach uses a single panel to form the backplane/display assembly while the WLP approach uses an array of wafer tiles to form the backplane/display assembly. Some of the benefits or advantages of these two approaches include using only known good CMOS die, and producing a high-performance backplane. Some of the challenges of the PLP approach are that panel level packaging processes are not generally available for production and custom or non-standard processes are needed. Custom processes may lead to increased production cost and time as well as possible decrease in quality. Some of the benefits or advantages of the WLP approach include good tool availability including LED bonding tools, laser lift-off tools, and microlens replication tools, and better yield with known-good tiles. The WLP approach may also provide a solution that evolves into the PLP approach. On the other hand, some of the challenges of the WLP approach are the need for precise tile dicing, the need for extremely precise tiling, the possible need for backside contacts if more than 4 wafer tiles are used in a display (e.g., for a 22 inch diagonal display with 12 inch square wafer tiles), and the possibility that a microlens tile seam may be visible (although in some embodiments, applying microlenses after completing the tiling process may reduce or eliminate the appearance of such seams).
The display 110 may have capabilities that include ultra-high-resolution capabilities (e.g., support for resolutions of 8K and higher), high dynamic range (contrast) capabilities, or light field capabilities, or a combination of these capabilities. The display 110 may further include light field capabilities and may operate as a light field display as illustrated in
A diagram 200a in
In the example shown in
A diagram 200b in
In the example shown in
Each of the picture elements 225 in the light field display 210b may include a corresponding light steering optical element (e.g., an integral imaging lens 215 illustrated in a diagram 200c in
As mentioned above, an array of light emitting elements 220b may be arranged into “raxels” 221 as shown within an enlarged version of the picture element 225 shown to the right of the diagram 200b. The picture element 225 may be an array X×Y of light emitting elements 220b, with X being the number of rows of light emitting elements 220b in the array and Y being the number of columns of light emitting elements 220b in the array. In one example, the picture element 225 is a 9×9 array including 81 light emitting elements or sub-raxels 220b.
In
Although the example of
As described in more detail below with respect to
As described in more detail below, the panel 340 includes multiple, separate, and electrically interconnected CMOS backplane dies (not shown) held together in the panel. The panel 340 may be formed using the same methods as those used to form the reconstructed wafers, but on a larger scale. As shown in the diagram 300b, edges of the panel 340 in an outer perimeter provide the electrical connectors 330 to interact or communicate with one or more of the CMOS backplane dies in the panel. Each CMOS backplane die in the panel is a CMOS integrated circuit configured to provide signals to control one or more respective subsets of light emitting elements (e.g., one or more sub-raxel 220b,
The diagram 500a in
The diagram 500b in
The diagram 500c in
The diagram 500d in
The diagram 500e in
Without any additional components (e.g., LED arrays and/or microlens arrays), the tile 535e shown in the diagram 500e, or the reconstructed wafer from which tile 535e was diced, may be considered a backplane or backplane assembly. However, additional components or elements (e.g., LED arrays and/or microlens arrays) may be added to the backplane or backplane assembly on the reconstructed wafer (as described in more detail below), and the structure may be considered a display assembly that may be diced or cut in the manner described above in connection with
The diagram 500f in
In another implementation, arrays of light reflecting elements, such as digital micromirror device (DMD) reflectors, may be used in combination with or instead of the LED arrays 560, in which case the electronics and circuitry of the CMOS backplane dies 510 may be selected to control the operation of one or more of the light reflecting elements. A display assembly having a plurality of DMD reflector arrays 590 is shown in
Further in connection with the diagrams 500f and 500i, some consideration is to be given to the accuracy of the flip chip bonding, as well as to the use of laser lift-off (LLO) such as available wafer scale LLO tools to, for example, remove the reconstructed wafer from the substrate 530 and/or separate the LED arrays 560 or DMD arrays 590 that are to be flip chip bonded. Additional considerations include the use of an underfill to compensate for a mismatch in the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) between the LED arrays (or DMD reflector arrays 590) and the CMOS backplane dies, difficulties in feeding the underfill when gaps between the flip chip connections are small, and whether to use underfill instead a pre-applied film. If no underfill is used, then consideration may be given to whether voids may occur in connection with microlenses and how to avoid such occurrences.
The diagram 500g in
The diagram 550h in
Diagrams 500j and 500k shown in
Referring to
Diagram 500k in
A diagram 700a in
A diagram 700b in
A diagram 700c in
A diagram 700d in
A diagram 700e in
The method 800a in
The method 800a includes at 810 providing multiple and separate CMOS backplane dies.
The method 800a optionally includes at 815 testing the CMOS backplane dies using a probing test and removing ones of the CMOS backplane dies that do not pass the test.
The method 800a includes at 820 forming a reconstructed wafer by holding the CMOS backplane dies together. The plurality of CMOS backplane dies may be held in a fixed position relative to each other using an adhesive layer disposed on a rigid substrate. The CMOS backplane dies and substrate assembly may be handled by standard processing equipment, rather than customized equipment, during subsequent processing steps in order to reduce fabrication costs. Further processing steps may include depositing an overmold layer, removing a portion of the overmold layer to expose electrically conductive pillars, depositing an electrical redistribution layer (RDL), and placing LED or DMD panels over the RDL.
The method 800a includes at 830 dicing a tile from the wafer (also referred to herein as a “reconstructed wafer”), where the CMOS backplane dies in the tile are electrically connected with each other.
The method 800a includes at 840 arranging the tile along with other tiles diced from other reconstructed wafers into an array of tiles, where edges of the tiles in an outer perimeter of the array of tiles provide electrical connections to interact with the CMOS backplane dies in the tiles.
In an aspect of the method 800a, each CMOS backplane die is a CMOS integrated circuit configured to provide signals to control one or more respective subsets of light emitting elements or light reflecting elements within the display assembly.
In an aspect of the method 800a, each CMOS backplane die has passed a wafer level probing test before it is included into its respective tile.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the reconstructed wafer is formed over a substrate, and the method 800a further includes removing the reconstituted wafer from the substrate by performing a wafer scale laser lift off (LLO) process that separates the reconstituted wafer from the substrate.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the reconstructed wafer is formed using a substrate, and the substrate remains part of the reconstructed wafer after tiles are fixed thereto and dicing is completed.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the reconstructed wafer is formed over a substrate, and the CMOS backplane dies are held in place in the reconstructed wafer by being permanently attached to the substrate.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the CMOS backplane dies in each tile are held together with an overmold, the CMOS backplane dies are positioned die up, and forming the reconstructed wafer further includes removing a top portion of the overmold to expose electrical pillars of the CMOS backplane dies to electrical interconnections between the CMOS backplane dies and an electrical redistribution layer. Moreover, removing of the top portion of the overmold includes grinding, etching, or otherwise removing the top portion of the overmold.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the CMOS backplane dies in each tile are held together with an overmold, and the method 800a further includes disposing the overmold at least in between and around the CMOS backplane dies and curing the overmold to form a portion of the reconstructed wafer, the overmold being made of a material containing silica, alumina, graphite, a ceramic, a polymer, or an electronic molding compound. The polymer may include polyimide or epoxy.
In an aspect of the method 800a, a size of the tile diced from the reconstructed wafer is in a range from 4 inches up to 18 inches. In some embodiments, the diced tile may be approximately 11 inches. Other tile sizes are also possible without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the tile diced from the reconstructed wafer is a rectangular tile or a square tile.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the reconstructed wafer is of a standard size for wafer level processing, the standard size being one of a 150 mm wafer size, a 200 mm wafer size, a 300 mm wafer size, or a 450 mm wafer size.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the array of tiles is arranged over a rigid substrate.
In an aspect of the method 800a, the array of tiles is arranged over a flexible substrate.
The method 800b in
The method 800b includes at 850, providing multiple and separate CMOS backplane dies.
The method 800b includes at 860, forming a panel by holding the CMOS backplane dies together, wherein the CMOS backplane dies in the panel are electrically interconnected, and wherein edges in an outer perimeter of the panel provide electrical connectors to interact with the CMOS backplane dies.
In an aspect of the method 800b, forming the panel includes holding the CMOS backplane dies together by bonding the CMOS backplane dies onto a substrate.
In an aspect of the method 800b, forming the panel includes holding the CMOS backplane dies together with an overmold.
In an aspect of the method 800b, forming the panel includes attaching the CMOS backplane dies onto a substrate and holding the CMOS backplane dies together with an overmold. The method 800b may further include removing the panel with the CMOS backplane dies from the substrate by performing a laser lift off (LLO) process that separates the panel from the substrate. Moreover, removing the panel from the substrate may include using a thermal, laser, or UV releasable layer between the panel and the substrate.
In an aspect of the method 800b, each CMOS backplane die is a CMOS integrated circuit configured to provide signals to control a respective subset of light emitting elements or light reflecting elements of the display.
In an aspect of the method 800b, each CMOS backplane die has passed a wafer level probing test before it is included into the panel.
In an aspect of the method 800b, the CMOS backplane dies are positioned die up, and forming the panel includes holding the CMOS backplane dies together with an overmold and removing a top portion of the overmold to expose electrical pillars of the CMOS backplane dies. Moreover, removing of the top portion of the overmold includes grinding the top portion of the overmold. Additionally, the electrical pillars of the CMOS backplane dies are exposed to electrical interconnections between the CMOS backplane dies and an electrical redistribution layer.
In an aspect of the method 800b, forming the panel includes holding the CMOS backplane dies together with an overmold, the method 800b further including disposing the overmold at least in between and around the CMOS backplane dies and curing the overmold to form the panel, the overmold being made of a material containing silica, alumina, graphite, a ceramic, a polymer, or an electronic molding compound. The polymer may include polyimide or epoxy.
The present disclosure describes various techniques and devices that enable larger and more dense assemblies for backplanes and displays that may be used with high resolution displays, such as light field displays.
The following claims are intended to cover all generic and specific features described herein, as well as all statements of the scope of the present method and system, which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween. In particular, the following embodiments are specifically contemplated, as well as any combinations of such embodiments that are compatible with one another:
Accordingly, although the present disclosure has been provided in accordance with the implementations shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the scope of the present disclosure. Therefore, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 63/005,731, filed Apr. 6, 2020, and incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2403731 | Macneille | Jul 1946 | A |
3936817 | Levy et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4432610 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
1825201 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4923285 | Ogino et al. | May 1990 | A |
4996523 | Bell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5018838 | Barnes et al. | May 1991 | A |
5144418 | Brown et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5157387 | Momose et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5189406 | Humphries et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5317334 | Sano | May 1994 | A |
5359342 | Nakai et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5471225 | Parks | Nov 1995 | A |
5473338 | Prince et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497172 | Doherty et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5537128 | Keene et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548347 | Melnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566010 | Ishii et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5602559 | Kimura | Feb 1997 | A |
5619228 | Doherty | Apr 1997 | A |
5731802 | Aras et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5751264 | Cavallerano et al. | May 1998 | A |
5767832 | Koyama et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818413 | Hayashi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5905482 | Hughes et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926158 | Yoneda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926162 | Wood et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936603 | Lippmann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936604 | Endou | Aug 1999 | A |
5945972 | Okumura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959598 | McKnight | Sep 1999 | A |
5969512 | Matsuyama | Oct 1999 | A |
5969701 | Numao et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986640 | Baldwin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005558 | Hudson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005649 | Krusius | Dec 1999 | A |
6034659 | Wald et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046716 | McKnight | Apr 2000 | A |
6067065 | Worley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6121948 | Worley et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127991 | Uehara et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128054 | Schwarzenberger | Oct 2000 | A |
6144356 | Weatherford et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151011 | Worley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
RE37056 | Wortel et al. | Feb 2001 | E |
6201521 | Doherty | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6262703 | Perner | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285360 | Li | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297788 | Shigeta et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317112 | Handschy et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6369782 | Shigeta | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6424330 | Johnson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456267 | Sato et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6476792 | Hattori et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6518945 | Pinkham | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567138 | Krusius et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587084 | Alymov et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6603452 | Serita | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621488 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6690432 | Janssen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717561 | Pfeiffer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731306 | Booth et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744415 | Waterman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762739 | Bone | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6784898 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788231 | Hsueh | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6806871 | Yasue | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6831626 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850216 | Akimoto et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862012 | Funakoshi et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6924824 | Adachi et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930667 | Ijima et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6930692 | Coker et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7066605 | Dewald et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067853 | Yao | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7088325 | Ishii | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7088329 | Hudson | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7129920 | Chow | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7187355 | Tam et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7379043 | Worley et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7397980 | Frisken | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7443374 | Hudson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7468717 | Hudson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7692671 | Ng | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7852307 | Hudson | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7990353 | Chow | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040311 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8111271 | Hudson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8264507 | Hudson et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8421828 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8643681 | Endo et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9047818 | Day et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9117746 | Clark et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9406269 | Lo et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9583031 | Hudson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9646562 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9824619 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9918053 | Lo et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10128308 | Shin et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10437402 | Pan | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10784241 | Chang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10957272 | Li et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11385473 | Balogh | Jul 2022 | B2 |
20010013844 | Shigeta | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020001051 | Krusius et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020024481 | Kawabe et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020041266 | Koyama et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020043610 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020135309 | Okuda | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140662 | Igarashi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158825 | Endo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030058195 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030156102 | Kimura | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174117 | Crossland et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030210257 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040032636 | Willis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040080482 | Magendanz et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125090 | Hudson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174328 | Hudson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233539 | Harwit | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050001794 | Nakanishi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050001806 | Ohmura | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052437 | Hudson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050057466 | Sala et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062765 | Hudson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050088462 | Borel | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050195894 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050200300 | Yumoto | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264586 | Kim | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012589 | Hsieh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012594 | Worley et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060066645 | Ng | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060147146 | Voigt et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060208961 | Nathan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060284903 | Ng | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060284904 | Ng | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070252855 | Hudson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070252856 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007576 | Ishii et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080088613 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080158437 | Arai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080259019 | Ng | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090027360 | Kwan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027364 | Kwan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090115703 | Cok | May 2009 | A1 |
20090284671 | Leister | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303248 | Ng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100073270 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100214646 | Sugimoto et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100253995 | Reichelt | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295836 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110109299 | Chaji et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109670 | Sempel et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110199405 | Dallas et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110205100 | Bogaerts | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110227887 | Dallas et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120086733 | Hudson et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120113167 | Margerm et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20130038585 | Kasai | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130308057 | Lu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140085426 | Leone et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092105 | Guttag et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150245038 | Clatanoff et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160103263 | Kazmierski | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160203801 | De Groot et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160365055 | Hudson et al. | Dec 2016 | A9 |
20180061302 | Hu et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190096864 | Huitema | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190302917 | Pan | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190333443 | He et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190347979 | Ahmed | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190347994 | Lin et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371229 | Wang et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200052702 | Hekmatshoartabari | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200098307 | Li et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20210201771 | Li et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20230007751 | Bonne | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230341986 | Chang | Oct 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104221071 | Dec 2014 | CN |
0658870 | Jun 1995 | EP |
1187087 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2327798 | Feb 1999 | GB |
7049663 | Feb 1995 | JP |
2002116741 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2018185515 | Nov 2018 | JP |
2021515263 | Jun 2021 | JP |
20180009116 | Jan 2018 | KR |
227005 | Jul 1994 | TW |
407253 | Oct 2000 | TW |
418380 | Jan 2001 | TW |
482991 | Apr 2002 | TW |
483282 | Apr 2002 | TW |
200603192 | Jan 2006 | TW |
0070376 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0152229 | Jul 2001 | WO |
2007127849 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2007127852 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2019124952 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019155243 | Aug 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Application No. PCT/US2021/025881, Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 16, 2021, 15 pages. |
Mansoorian, B, et al. “A 4-Side Tileable Back Illuminated 3D-integrated Mpixel CMOS Image Sensor.” Solid-State Circuits Conference-Digest of Technical Papers, 2009. ISSCC 2009. IEEE International. 2009, pp. 38-39, 39a. |
“2114A 1024 x4 Bit Static RAM”, Component Data Catalog, Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA, USA, 1982, 7 pages. |
Amon , et al., “PTAT Sensors Based on SJFETs”, 10th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, MEleCon, vol. II, 2000, pp. 802-805. |
Anderson , et al., “Holographic Data Storage: Science Fiction or Science Fact”, Akonia Holographics LLC, presented at Optical Data Storage, 2014, 8 pages. |
Armitage , et al., “Introduction to Microdisplays”, John Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp. 182-185. |
Authors Unknown , “Sony 3D”, screen capture from video clip, 2009, 2 pages. |
Baker , “CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation”, IEEE Press Series on Microelectronic Systems, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication, 2010, pp. 614-616. |
Campardo , et al., “VLSI—Design of Non-Volatile Memories”, Springer, 2005, pp. 183-188. |
Colgan , et al., “On-Chip Metallization Layers for Reflective Light Waves”, Journal of Research Development, vol. 42, No. 3/4, May-Jul. 1998, pp. 339-345. |
CSE370 , “Flip-Flops”, Lecture 14, https://studylib.net/doc/18055423/flip-flops, no date, pp. 1-17. |
Dai , et al., “Characteristics of LCoS Phase-only spatial light modulator and its applications”, Optics Communications vol. 238, especially section 3.2, 2004, pp. 269-276. |
Drabik , “Optically Interconnected Parallel Processor Arrays”, A Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Dec. 1989, pp. 121-126. |
Fuller , “Static Random Access Memory—SRAM”, Rochester Institute of technology to Microelectronic Engineering, Nov. 18, 2016, pp. 1-39. |
Hu , “Complementary MOS (CMOS) Technology”, Feb. 13, 2009, pp. 198-200. |
Jesacher , et al., “Broadband suppression of the zero diffraction order of an SLM using its extended phase modulation range”, Optics Express, vol. 22, No. 14, Jul. 14, 2014, pp. 17590-17599. |
Kang , et al., “Digital Driving of TN-LC for WUXGA LCOS Panel”, Digest of Technical Papers, Society for Information Display, 2001, pp. 1264-1267. |
Nakamura , et al., “Modified drive method for OCB LSD”, Proceeding of the International Display Research Conference, Society for Information Display, Campbell, CA, US, 1997, 4 pages. |
ONG , “Modern Mos Technology: Processes, Devices, and Design”, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1984, pp. 207-212. |
Oton , et al., “Multipoint phase calibration for improved compensation of inherent wavefront distortion in parallel aligned liquid crystal on silicon display”, Applied Optics, vol. 46, No. 23, Optical Society of America, 2007, pp. 5667-5679. |
Pelgrom , et al., “Matching Properties of MOS Transistors”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 23, No. 5, Oct. 1989, 8 pages. |
Potter , et al., “Optical correlation using a phase-only liquid crystal over silicon spatial light modulator”, SPIE 1564 Opt. Info. Proc. Sys & Arch. III;, 1991, pp. 363-372. |
Product Description , “Westar's Microdisplay Inspection System”, www.westar.com/mdis, Jan. 2000, 2 pages. |
Rabaey , et al., “Digital Integrated Circuits”, A Design Perspective, Second Edition, Saurabh Printers Pvt. Ltd, 2016, pp. 138-140. |
Rabaey , “The Devices Chapter 3”, Jan. 18, 2002, pp. 121-124. |
Robinson , et al., “Polarization Engineering for LCD Projection”, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England, 2005, pp. 121-123. |
Sloof , et al., “An Improved WXGA LCOS Imager for Single Panel Systems”, Proceedings of the Asia Symposium on Information Display, Society for Information Display, Campbell, CA, US, 2004, 4 pages. |
SMPTE 274M-2005 , “1920 × 1080 Image Sample Structure, Digital Representation and Digital Timing Reference Sequences for Multiple Picture Rates”, SMPTE, White Plains, New York, US, 2005, 29 pages. |
Underwood , et al., “Evaluation of an nMOS VLSI array for an adaptive liquid-crystal spatial light modulator”, IEEE Proc, v.133 PI.J. No., Feb. 1986, 15 pages. |
Wang , “Studies of Liquid Crystal Response Time”, University of Central Florida, Doctoral Dissertation, 2005, 128 pages. |
Wu , “Discussion #9 MOSFETs”, University of California at Berkeley College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Spring 2008, pp. 1-7. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21783762.4, mailed Mar. 7, 2024, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210313298 A1 | Oct 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63005731 | Apr 2020 | US |