This invention relates to interspinous process implants.
The spinal column is a bio-mechanical structure composed primarily of ligaments, muscles, vertebrae and intervertebral disks. The bio-mechanical functions of the spine include: (1) support of the body, which involves the transfer of the weight and the bending movements of the head, trunk and anus to the pelvis and legs, (2) complex physiological motion between these parts, and (3) protection of the spinal cord and the nerve roots.
As the present society ages, it is anticipated that there will be an increase in adverse spinal conditions which are characteristic of older people. By way of example only, with aging comes an increase in spinal stenosis (including, but not limited to, central canal and lateral stenosis), and facet arthropathy. Spinal stenosis results in a reduction foraminal area (i.e., the available space for the passage of nerves and blood vessels) which compresses the cervical nerve roots and causes radicular pain. Humpreys, S. C. et al., Flexion and traction effect on C5-C6 foraminal space, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 79 at 1105 (September 1998). Another symptom of spinal stenosis is myelopathy, which results in neck pain and muscle weakness. Id. Extension and ipsilateral rotation of the neck further reduces the foraminal area and contributes to pain, nerve root compression and neural injury. Id.; Yoo, J. U. et al., Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine, Spine, vol. 17 at 1131 (Nov. 10, 1992). In contrast, neck flexion increases the foraminal area. Humpreys, S. C. et al., at 1105.
Pain associated with stenosis can be relieved by medication and/or surgery. It is desirable to eliminate the need for major surgery for all individuals, and in particular, for the elderly.
Accordingly, a need exists to develop spine implants that alleviate pain caused by spinal stenosis and other such conditions caused by damage to, or degeneration of, the cervical spine. Such implants would distract, or increase the space between, the vertebrae to increase the foraminal area and reduce pressure on the nerves and blood vessels of the cervical spine.
A further need exists for development of a minimally invasive surgical implantation method for cervical spine implants that preserves the physiology of the spine.
Further, a need exists for an implant that accommodates the distinct anatomical structures of the spine, minimizes further trauma to the spine, and obviates the need for invasive methods of surgical implantation. Additionally, a need exists to address adverse spinal conditions that are exacerbated by spinal extension.
Interspinous Implants
As can be seen in
As can be seen in
In other embodiments, the implant 100 can have two wings, with a second wing 160 (shown in
As can be seen in
It is to be understood that the implant can be made in two pieces. The first piece can include the first wing 130, the spacer 120, and the distraction guide 110. The second piece can include the second wing 160. Each piece can be manufactured using technique known in the art (e.g., machining, molding, extrusion). Each piece, as will be more fully discussed below, can be made of a material that is bio-compatible with the body of the patient. For example the implants can be made of stainless steel and titanium. Additionally, a shape memory metal such as Nitinol, which is a combination of titanium and nickel, can also be used. Further polymers can also be used. The implant can be formed with multiple pieces and with the pieces appropriately joined together, or alternatively, the implant can be formed as one piece or joined together as one piece.
Further embodiments of implants in accordance with the present invention are depicted in
With respect to the prior embodiments which have first and second wings, the second wing 160, can be designed to be interference-fit onto the spacer 120 (where the spacer is fixed) or a portion of the distraction guide 110 adjacent to the spacer 120 (where the spacer is rotatable). Where the second wing 160 is interference-fit, there is no additional attachment device to fasten the second wing 160 relative to the remainder of the implant. Alternatively, various fasteners can be used to secure the second wing 160 relative to the remainder of the implant. For example,
Systems and methods in accordance with the present invention can include devices that can be used in cooperation with implants of the present invention.
Distractible Interspinous Implants
In still other embodiments, implants in accordance with the present invention can be distractible in situ.
The body 1801 can include a wing 1830 having a first and second portion 1832,1834, a spacer 1820 having a first and second portion 1822,1824, and a lead-in tissue expander (also referred to herein as a distraction guide) 1810 having a first and second portion 1812,1814. The distraction guide 1810 as shown is wedge-shaped, i.e., the distraction guide 1810 has an expanding cross-section from the proximal end of the body 1801 to a region where the distraction guide 1810 joins with the spacer 1820. As such, the distraction guide 1810 functions to initiate distraction of the soft tissue and the spinous processes when the body 1801 is surgically inserted between the spinous processes.
The spacer 1820, as shown, is teardrop-shaped in a cross-section perpendicular to the spacer's longitudinal axis 1825. The spacer 1820 can be shaped to roughly conform to a wedge-like space, or a portion of the space, between adjacent spinous processes, for example as between the spinous processes of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae. The shape of the spacer 1820 can be selected for a particular patient, and/or a particular pair of adjacent spinous processes, and can vary substantially. Thus, in other embodiments, the spacer 1820 can have other cross-sectional shapes, such as circular, wedge, oval, ovoid, football-shaped, and rectangular-shaped with rounded corners and other cross-sectional shapes and/or can be custom fabricated for the particular patient and the anatomy of the particular spinal processes between which the implant 1800 is to be placed. In still other embodiments, the spacer 1820 can have a nonsymmetrical cross-sectional shape, for example where a space between adjacent spinous processes is nonsymmetrical. The ability to select a size and shape of the spacer 1820 to suit a patient allows the physician to choose an implant 1800 that can be placed closer to the vertebral bodies than farther away for additional support. The shape selected for the spacer 1820 can define the contact surface area between the implant 1800 and the spinous processes that are subject to distraction. Increasing the contact surface area between the implant 1800 and the spinous processes distributes the force and load between the spinous frame and the implant 1800. Generally, a teardrop or wedge-shaped spacer 1820 can allow for more load-bearing contact between the spacer 1820 and the spinous processes of the cervical vertebrae, and embodiments having such shapes will be more particularly described.
As shown, the wing 1830 can be tear-drop shaped in cross-section, although having a minor dimension that is larger than that of the spacer 1820, and can limit or block lateral displacement of the implant 1800 in the direction of insertion along the longitudinal axis 1825. However, the wing 1830 need not be teardrop shaped. In other embodiments, the wing 1830 can have some other shape, for example the wing 1830 can be elliptical, wedge, circular, oval, ovoid, football-shaped, and rectangular-shaped with rounded corners and other shapes, and be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Further, as with the spacer 1820, the wing 1830 can have a nonsymmetrical cross-sectional shape. The shape of the wing 1830 can be chosen to most easily fit into place while avoiding obstructions, such as soft tissue or bone, or other implants, while still blocking or limiting lateral displacement.
The wing 1830 can include one or more cavities 1852,1854 that extend through the wing 1830 and through at least a portion of the spacer 1820. The one or more cavities 1852,1854 should comprise a first groove formed in the first part 1802 and a second groove formed in the second part 1804, so that the cross-section of the cavity 1852,1854 can be expanded during insertion of a distracting insert 1806, as described below. The body 1801 of
Once the body 1801 is positioned between adjacent spinous processes, the first and second parts 1802,1804 of the body 1801 can be separated, thereby expanding the width of the body 1801 and distracting the adjacent spinous processes. In one embodiment, separation of the first and second parts 1802,1804 can be accomplished, for example, by positioning the distracting insert 806 within the body 1801 such that the first and second parts 1802,1804 are urged apart. As mentioned above, the distracting insert 1806 can include one or more inserts associated with the one or more cavities, the one or more inserts being fixedly connected to a cap 1808. As shown in
As shown in
As with the body 1801, multiple distracting inserts 1806 can be made available to a physician, the physician choosing a distracting insert 1806 sized to suit a particular patient. A system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention can comprise a plurality of bodies 1801, each body 1801 having different shape and/or height. Such a system can further comprise a plurality of distracting inserts 1806, having inserts corresponding to cavities of the bodies 1801, and having different heights to achieve different amounts of distraction. Methods in accordance with embodiments of the present invention can apply such systems so that a physician can select implant components appropriate to the patient at the time of surgery, and can further substitute different bodies and/or different distracting inserts based on evaluation or reevaluation during surgery.
In an alternative embodiment (not shown), the first part 1802 and second part 1804 of the body 1801 can be bound together by a flexible, artificial ligament or suture material. For example, the material can be a bio-compatible polymer having flexible properties. The artificial ligament or suture material can limit the shifting between the first part 1802 and second part 1804. In still other embodiments, some other device can be employed to maintain alignment of the first and second parts 1802,1804. It is intended that in some embodiments of the present invention, it is preferable to maintain alignment of the first and second parts 1802,1804 during distraction. As one of ordinary skill in the art can appreciate, many different devices can be employed to maintain alignment between the first and second parts 1802,1804 of the body 1801.
As shown in
As shown in
In still further embodiments, the distracting insert 1806 need not include a clip, but can be mated with the body 1801 using some other device. For example, as shown in
Referring to
It is to be understood that the various features of the various embodiments can be combined with other embodiments of the invention and be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, for example only, the embodiment of
Materials for Use in Implants of the Present Invention
It is to be understood that implants in accordance with the present invention, and/or portions thereof can be fabricated from somewhat flexible and/or deflectable material. In these embodiments, the implant and/or portions thereof can be made out of a polymer, such as a thermoplastic. For example, in one embodiment, the implant can be made from polyketone, known as polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Still more specifically, the implant can be made from PEEK 450G, which is an unfilled PEEK approved for medical implantation available from Victrex of Lancashire, Great Britain. Other sources of this material include Gharda located in Panoli, India. PEEK has the following approximate properties:
The material specified has appropriate physical and mechanical properties and is suitable for carrying and spreading a physical load between the adjacent spinous processes. The implant and/or portions thereof can be formed by extrusion, injection, compression molding and/or machining techniques.
In some embodiments, the implant can comprise, at least in part, titanium or stainless steel, or other suitable implant material which is radiopaque, and at least in part a radiolucent material that does not show up under x-ray or other type of imaging. For example, in one embodiment, a first wing, a second wing and a shaft can comprise a radiopaque material (e.g., titanium) and a rotatable spacer and a lead-in tissue expander can comprise a radiolucent material (e.g., PEEK). In such an embodiment, under imaging the implant looks like an “H”. The physician can have a less obstructed view of the spine under imaging, than with an implant comprising radiopaque materials entirely. However, the implant need not comprise any radiolucent materials.
It should be noted that the material selected can also be filled. For example, other grades of PEEK are also available and contemplated, such as 30% glass-filled or 30% carbon-filled, provided such materials are cleared for use in implantable devices by the FDA, or other regulatory body. Glass-filled PEEK reduces the expansion rate and increases the flexural modulus of PEEK relative to that which is unfilled. The resulting product is known to be ideal for improved strength, stiffness, or stability. Carbon-filled PEEK is known to enhance the compressive strength and stiffness of PEEK and lower its expansion rate. Carbon-filled PEEK offers wear resistance and load carrying capability.
In this embodiment, as described above, the implant is manufactured from PEEK, available from Victrex. As will be appreciated, other suitable similarly biocompatible thermoplastic or thermoplastic polycondensate materials that resist fatigue, have good memory, are flexible, and/or deflectable, have very low moisture absorption, and good wear and/or abrasion resistance, can be used without departing from the scope of the invention. The spacer can also be comprised of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). Other material that can be used include polyetherketone (PEK), polyetherketoneetherketoneketone (PEKEKK), and polyetheretherketoneketone (PEEKK), and generally a polyaryletheretherketone. Further, other polyketones can be used as well as other thermoplastics. Reference to appropriate polymers that can be used in the implant can be made to the following documents, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. These documents include: PCT Publication WO 02/02158 A1, dated Jan. 10, 2002, entitled “Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials;” PCT Publication WO 02/00275 A1, dated Jan. 3, 2002, entitled “Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials;” and, PCT Publication WO 02/00270 A1, dated Jan. 3, 2002, entitled “Bio-Compatible Polymeric Materials.” Other materials such as Bionate®, polycarbonate urethane, available from the Polymer Technology Group, Berkeley, Calif., may also be appropriate because of the good oxidative stability, biocompatibility, mechanical strength and abrasion resistance. Other thermoplastic materials and other high molecular weight polymers can be used.
Methods for Implanting Interspinous Implants
A minimally invasive surgical method for implanting an implant 100,1800 in the cervical spine is disclosed and taught herein. In this method, as shown in
Once the implant 100 is satisfactorily positioned, a second wing 160 can be optionally inserted along a line that is generally colinear with the line over which the implant 100 is inserted but from the opposite side of the neck. The anatomy of the neck is such that it is most convenient and minimally invasive to enter the neck from the side with respect to the implant 100 and the second wing 160. The second wing 160 is mated to the implant and in this particular embodiment, the second wing 160 is snapped into engagement with the implant 100. In an alternative embodiment, the second wing 160 is attached to the implant by the use of a fastener, for example by a screw 450. Where a screw is used, the screw 450 can be positioned using a screw driving mechanism that is directed along a posterior to anterior line somewhat parallel to the guide wire 2480. This posterior to anterior line aids the physician in viewing and securing the second wing 160 to the implant.
In other embodiments of methods in accordance with the present invention, the implant can be a distractible implant 1800, such as described above in
Once the distractible implant 1800 is satisfactorily positioned and distracted, a second wing 2360 can optionally be inserted along a line that is generally colinear with the line over which the body 1801 is inserted but from the opposite side of the neck. The anatomy of the neck is such that it is most convenient and minimally invasive to enter the neck from the side with respect to the body 1801 and the second wing 2360. The second wing 2360 can be mated to the body 1801 through an interference fit, or alternatively by attaching to the body 1801 by the use of a fastener, or by some other device, as described above. For example, where a screw is employed, the screw can be positioned using a screw driving mechanism that is directed along a posterior to anterior line somewhat parallel to the guide wire. This posterior to anterior line aids the physician in viewing and securing the second wing 2360 to the body 1801.
The foregoing description of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in this art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the following claims and their equivalents.
This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/850,267, filed May 20, 2004, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application entitled Cervical Interspinous Process Distraction Implant And Method Of Implantation, Ser. No. 60/472,817, filed May 22, 2003. The entire contents of both applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
624969 | Peterson | May 1899 | A |
1153797 | Kegreisz | Sep 1915 | A |
1516347 | Pataky | Nov 1924 | A |
1870942 | Beatty | Aug 1932 | A |
2299308 | Creighton | Oct 1942 | A |
2485531 | Dzus et al. | Oct 1949 | A |
2607370 | Anderson | Aug 1952 | A |
2677369 | Knowles | May 1954 | A |
2685877 | Dobelle | Aug 1954 | A |
3065659 | Eriksson et al. | Nov 1962 | A |
3108595 | Overment | Oct 1963 | A |
3397699 | Kohl | Aug 1968 | A |
3648691 | Lumb et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
4011602 | Rybicki et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4257409 | Bacal et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4274324 | Giannuzzi | Jun 1981 | A |
4327736 | Inoue | May 1982 | A |
4499636 | Tanaka | Feb 1985 | A |
4519100 | Wills et al. | May 1985 | A |
4554914 | Kapp et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4573454 | Hoffman | Mar 1986 | A |
4592341 | Omagari et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4604995 | Stephens et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4646998 | Pate | Mar 1987 | A |
4662808 | Camilleri | May 1987 | A |
4686970 | Dove et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4704057 | McSherry | Nov 1987 | A |
4721103 | Freedland | Jan 1988 | A |
4787378 | Sodhi | Nov 1988 | A |
4822226 | Kennedy | Apr 1989 | A |
4827918 | Olerud | May 1989 | A |
4834600 | Lemke | May 1989 | A |
5000166 | Karpf | Mar 1991 | A |
5011484 | Breard | Apr 1991 | A |
5035712 | Hoffman | Jul 1991 | A |
5047055 | Bao et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5092866 | Breard et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5201734 | Cozad et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5267999 | Olerud | Dec 1993 | A |
5306275 | Bryan | Apr 1994 | A |
5316422 | Coffman | May 1994 | A |
5356423 | Tihon et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360430 | Lin | Nov 1994 | A |
5366455 | Dove | Nov 1994 | A |
5370697 | Baumgartner | Dec 1994 | A |
5401269 | Buttner-Janz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5415661 | Holmes | May 1995 | A |
5437672 | Alleyne | Aug 1995 | A |
5439463 | Lin | Aug 1995 | A |
5454812 | Lin | Oct 1995 | A |
5456689 | Kresch et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480442 | Bertagnoli | Jan 1996 | A |
5496318 | Howland et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5540689 | Sanders et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571192 | Schonhoffer | Nov 1996 | A |
5609634 | Voydeville | Mar 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
5674295 | Ray et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5676702 | Ratron | Oct 1997 | A |
5685826 | Bonutti | Nov 1997 | A |
5690649 | Li | Nov 1997 | A |
5702391 | Lin | Dec 1997 | A |
5702452 | Argenson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5725341 | Hofmeister | Mar 1998 | A |
5749916 | Richelsoph | May 1998 | A |
5810815 | Morales | Sep 1998 | A |
5836948 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860977 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5941881 | Barnes | Aug 1999 | A |
5976186 | Bao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980523 | Jackson | Nov 1999 | A |
6022376 | Assell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6048342 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068630 | Zucherman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074390 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6102922 | Jakobsson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6132464 | Martin | Oct 2000 | A |
6214037 | Mitchell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224599 | Baynham et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245107 | Ferree | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6293949 | Justis et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6352537 | Strnad | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364883 | Santilli | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402750 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419703 | Fallin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432130 | Hanson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436140 | Liu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440169 | Elberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447546 | Bramlet et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451019 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6500178 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500205 | Michelson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511508 | Shahinpoor et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514256 | Zucherman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6527803 | Crozet et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6572653 | Simonson | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582433 | Yun | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6626944 | Taylor | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645207 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6669729 | Chin | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6695842 | Zucherman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699246 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709435 | Lin | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723126 | Berry | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6733531 | Trieu | May 2004 | B1 |
6733534 | Sherman | May 2004 | B2 |
6743257 | Castro | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761720 | Senegas | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6835205 | Atkinson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6902580 | Fallin et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6946000 | Senegas et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7041136 | Goble et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048736 | Robinson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087083 | Pasquet et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7097654 | Freedland | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7101375 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7128760 | Michelson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7163558 | Senegas et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7201751 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7238204 | Le Couedic et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7306628 | Zucherman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335203 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7377942 | Berry | May 2008 | B2 |
7431735 | Liu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442208 | Mathieu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7445637 | Taylor | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7604652 | Arnin et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7621950 | Globerman et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7641673 | Le Couedic et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7658752 | Labrom et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674297 | Falahee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7749252 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771456 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7862615 | Carli et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901430 | Matsuura et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7927354 | Edidin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20010016743 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049527 | Cragg | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020143331 | Zucherman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030040746 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030045940 | Eberlein et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065330 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030153915 | Nekozuka et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030176925 | Paponneau | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040010312 | Enayati | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010316 | William et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064094 | Freyman | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087947 | Lim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040097931 | Mitchell | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106995 | LeCouedic et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117017 | Pasquet et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040133280 | Trieu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158248 | Ginn | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172029 | Lerch | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186577 | Ferree | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199255 | Mathieu et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050010293 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033434 | Berry | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049590 | Alleyne et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050049708 | Atkinson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056292 | Cooper | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085814 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050143827 | Globerman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165398 | Reiley | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203512 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203519 | Harms et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203624 | Serhan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228391 | Levy et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261768 | Trieu | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267579 | Reiley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273166 | Sweeney | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288672 | Ferree | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004447 | Mastrorio et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015181 | Elberg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047282 | Gordon | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064165 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084983 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084985 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084987 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084988 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085069 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085070 | Kim | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085074 | Raiszadeh | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089654 | Lins et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089719 | Trieu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106381 | Ferree et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106397 | Lins | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111728 | Abdou | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122620 | Kim | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129239 | Kwak | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136060 | Taylor | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142858 | Colleran et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149242 | Kraus et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060182515 | Panasik et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184247 | Edidin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184248 | Edidin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195102 | Malandain | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217726 | Maxy et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224159 | Anderson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224241 | Butler et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235387 | Peterman | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235532 | Meunier et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241613 | Bruneau et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241643 | Lim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241757 | Anderson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247623 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247640 | Blackwell et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060264938 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265074 | Krishna et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271044 | Petrini et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271049 | Zucherman et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271061 | Beyer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282075 | Labrom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282079 | Labrom et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293662 | Boyer, II et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293663 | Walkenhorst et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005064 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010813 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032790 | Aschmann et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043362 | Malandain et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043363 | Malandain et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049935 | Edidin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073289 | Kwak et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100340 | Lange et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123861 | Dewey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162000 | Perkins | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167945 | Lange et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173822 | Bruneau et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173823 | Dewey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173832 | Tebbe et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191833 | Bruneau et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191834 | Bruneau et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191837 | Trieu | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198091 | Boyer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070225810 | Colleran et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233068 | Bruneau et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233074 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233076 | Trieu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233081 | Pasquet et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233084 | Betz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233089 | DiPoto et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250060 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270823 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270824 | Lim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270825 | Carls et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270826 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270827 | Lim et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270828 | Bruneau et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270829 | Carls et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270834 | Bruneau et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270874 | Anderson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272259 | Allard et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276368 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276496 | Lange et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276497 | Anderson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080021460 | Bruneau et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080097446 | Reiley et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114357 | Allard et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114358 | Anderson et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114456 | Dewey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147190 | Dewey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161818 | Kloss et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167685 | Allard et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080177306 | Lamborne et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183209 | Robinson et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183211 | Lamborne et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183218 | Mueller et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195152 | Altarac et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215094 | Taylor | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234824 | Youssef et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243250 | Seifert et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281359 | Abdou | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281360 | Vittur et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281361 | Vittur et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090062915 | Kohm et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099610 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105766 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105773 | Lange et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090240283 | Carls et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264927 | Ginsberg et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090292316 | Hess | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090326538 | Sennett et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036419 | Patel et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100121379 | Edmond | May 2010 | A1 |
20100191241 | McCormack et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204732 | Aschmann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211101 | Blackwell et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241167 | Taber et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110054531 | Lamborne et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110144692 | Saladin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166600 | Lamborne et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2821678 | Nov 1979 | DE |
202006018978 | Feb 2007 | DE |
0322334 | Feb 1992 | EP |
1011464 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1138268 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1148850 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1148851 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1330987 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1552797 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1854433 | Nov 2007 | EP |
1905392 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2623085 | May 1989 | FR |
2625097 | Jun 1989 | FR |
2681525 | Mar 1993 | FR |
2700941 | Aug 1994 | FR |
2703239 | Oct 1994 | FR |
2707864 | Jan 1995 | FR |
2717675 | Sep 1995 | FR |
2722087 | Jan 1996 | FR |
2722088 | Jan 1996 | FR |
2724554 | Mar 1996 | FR |
2725892 | Apr 1996 | FR |
2730156 | Aug 1996 | FR |
2775183 | Aug 1999 | FR |
2799948 | Apr 2001 | FR |
2816197 | May 2002 | FR |
02-224660 | Sep 1990 | JP |
09-075381 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2003079649 | Mar 2003 | JP |
988281 | Jan 1983 | SU |
1484348 | Jun 1989 | SU |
WO 9426192 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9426195 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9820939 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 2004047691 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004084743 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004110300 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005009300 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005044118 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110258 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006064356 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007034516 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2012035275 | Mar 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Anasetti et al., “Spine Stability After Implantation of an Interspinous Device: An In Vitro and Finite Element Biomechanical Study,” J. Neurosurg. Spine, Nov. 2010, vol. 13, pp. 568-575. |
Bellini et al., “Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine After Dynamic Stabilization,” J. Spinal Discord Tech., 2006, vol. 00, No. 00, pp. 1-7. |
Bini et al., “Minimally Invasive Treatment of Moderate Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with the Superion® Interspinous Spacer,” The Open Orthopaedics Journal, May 27, 2011, pp. 361-367, vol. 5. |
Buric et al., “DIAM Device for Low Back Pain in Degenerative Disc Disease 24 Months Follow-up,” Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves, Alexandre et al., eds., 2011, pp. 177-182, Spinger-Verlat/Wien. |
Phillips et al., “Biomechanics of Posterior Dynamic Stabiling Device (DIAM) After Facetectomy and Disectomy,” The Spine Journal, 2006, vol. 6, pp. 714-722. |
Taylor et al., “Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion: Technique and Intial Results,” 22 Neurosurg. Focus, Jan. 2007, vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-6. |
Wilke et al., “Biomedical Effect of Different Lumbar Interspinous Implants on Flexibilty and Intradiscal Pressure,” Eur Spine J., Vo. 17, published online Jun. 27, 2008, pp. 1049-1056. |
Zhao et al., “Efficacy of the Dynamic Interspinous Assisted Motion System in Clinical Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disease,” Chin. Med. J., 2010, vol. 123, No. 21, pp. 2974-2977. |
“Dispositivo Intervertebrale Ammortizzante DIAM,” date unknown, p. 1. |
“Tecnica Operatoria Per II Posizionamento Della Protesi Diam,” date unknown, pp. 1-3. |
“Wallis Operative Technique: Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) of Lumbar Spine,” date unknown, pp. 1-24, Spine Next, an Abbott Laboratories company, Bordeaux, France. |
Benzel et al., “Posterior Cervical Interspinous Compression Wiring and Fusion for Mid to Low Cervical Spinal Injuries,” J. Neurosurg., Jun. 1989, ppp. 893-899, vol. 70. |
Caserta et al., “Elastic Stabilization Alone or Combined with Rigid Fusion in Spinal Surgery: a Biomechanical Study and Clinical Experience Based on 82 Cases,” Eur. Spine J., Oct. 2002, pp. S192- S197, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. |
Christie et al., “Dynamic Interspinous Process Technology,” Spine, 2005, pp. S73-S78, vol. 30, No. 16S. |
Cousin Biotech, “Analysis of Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant,” date unknown, pp. 2-9. |
Cousin Biotech, Dispositif Intervertébral Amortissant, Jun. 1998, pp. 1-4. |
Cousin Biotech, Technique Operatoire de la Prothese Diam, date unknown, Annexe 1, pp. 1-8. |
Dickman et al., “The Interspinous Method of Posterior Atlantoaxial Arthrodesis,” J. Neurosurg., Feb. 1991, pp. 190-198, vol. 74. |
Dubois et al., “Dynamic Neutralization: A New Concept for Restabilization of the Spine,” Lumbar Segmental Insability, Szpalski et al., eds., 1999, pp. 233-240, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. |
Ebara et al., “Inoperative Measurement of Lumbar Spinal Instability,” Spine, 1992, pp. S44-S50, vol. 17, No. 3S. |
Fassio et al., “Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Instability L4-L5 by Interspinous Ligamentoplasty,” Rachis, Dec. 1991, pp. 465-474, vol. 3, No. 6. |
Fassio, “Mise au Point Sur la Ligamentoplastie Inter-Epineuse Lombaire Dans les Instabilites,” Maîtrise Orthopédique, Jul. 1993, pp. 18, No. 25. |
Garner et al., “Development and Preclinical Testing of a New Tension-Band Device for the Spine: the Loop System,” Eur. Spine J., Aug. 7, 2002, pp. S186-S191, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. |
Guang et al., “Interspinous Process Segmental Instrumentation with Bone-Button-Wire for Correction of Scoliosis,” Chinese Medical J., 1990, pp. 721-725, vol. 103. |
Guizzardi et al., “The Use of DIAM (Interspinous Stress-Breaker Device) in the Prevention of Chronic Low Back Pain in Young Patients Operated on for Large Dimension Lumbar Disc Herniation,” 12th Eur. Cong. Neurosurg., Sep. 7-12, 2003, pp. 835-839, Port. |
Hambly et al., “Tension Band Wiring-Bone Grafting for Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis,” Spine, 1989, pp. 455-460, vol. 14, No. 4. |
Kiwerski, “Rehabilitation of Patients with Thoracic Spine Injury Treated by Spring Alloplasty,” Int. J. Rehab. Research, 1983, pp. 469-474, vol. 6, No. 4. |
Kramer et al., “Intervetertebral Disk Diseases: Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment and Prophylaxis,” pp. 244-249, Medical, 1990. |
Laudet et al., “Comportement Bio-Mécanique D'Un Ressort Inter-Apophysaire Vertébral Posterieur Analyse Expérimentale Due Comportement Discal En Compression Et En Flexion/Extension,” Rachis, 1993, vol. 5, No. 2. |
Mah et al., “Threaded K-Wire Spinous Process Fixation of the Axis for Modified Gallie Fusion in Children and Adolescents,” J. Pediatric Othopaedics, 1989, pp. 675-679, vol. 9. |
Mariottini et al., “Preliminary Results of a Soft Novel Lumbar Intervertebral Prothesis (DIAM) in the Degenerative Spinal Pathology,” Acta Neurochir., Adv. Peripheral Nerve Surg. and Minimal Invas. Spinal Surg., 2005, pp. 129-131, vol. 92, Suppl. |
McDonnell et al., “Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion: Indications and Techniques,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 92-106, Ch. 9, Thieme, New York. |
Minns et al., “Preliminary Design and Experimental Studies of a Novel Soft Implant for Correcting Sagittal Plane Instability in the Lumbar Spine,” Spine, 1997, pp. 1819-1825, vol. 22, No. 16. |
Müller, “Restauration Dynamique de la Stabilité Rachidienne,” Tiré de la Sulzer Technical Review, Jan. 1999, Sulzer Management Ltd, Winterthur, Switzerland. |
Pennal et al., “Stenosis of the Lumbar Spinal Canal,” Clinical Neurosurgery: Proceedings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, 1970, Tindall et al., eds., 1971, Ch. 6, pp. 86-105, vol. 18. |
Petrini et al., “Analisi Di Un'Esperienza Clinica Con Un Impianto Posteriore Ammortizzante,” S.O.T.I.M.I. Società di Ortopedia e Traumatologia dell'Italia Meridionale e Insulare 90 ° Congresso, Jun. 21-23, 2001, Paestum. |
Petrini et al., “Stabilizzazione Elastica,” Patologia Degenerativa del Rachide Lombare, Oct. 5-6, 2001, Rimini. |
Porter, “Spinal Stenosis and Neurogenic Claudication,” Spine, Sep. 1, 1996, pp. 2046-2052, vol. 21, No. 17. |
Pupin et al., “Clinical Experience with a Posterior Shock-Absorbing Implant in Lumbar Spine,” World Spine 1: First Interdisciplinary World Congress on Spinal Surgery and Related Disciplines, Aug. 27-Sep. 1, 2000, Berlin, Germany. |
Rengachary et al., “Cervical Spine Stabilization with Flexible, Multistrand Cable System,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 79-81, Ch. 7, Thieme, New York. |
Richards et al., “The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication,” Spine, 2005, pp. 744-749, vol. 30, No. 7. |
Scarfò, “Instability/Stenosis: Holistic Approach for Less Invasive Surgery,” date unknown, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. |
Schiavone et al., “The Use of Disc Assistance Prosthesis (DIAM) in Degenerative Lumbar Pathology: Indications, Technique, Results,” Italian J. Spinal Disorders, 2003, pp. 213-220, vol. 3, No. 2. |
Schlegel et al., “The Role of Distraction in Improving the Space Available in the Lumbar Stenotic Canal and Foramen,” Spine, 1994, pp. 2041-2047, vol. 19, No. 18. |
Senegas et al., “Le Recalibrage du Canal Lombaire, Alternative à la Laminectomie dans le Traitement des Sténoses du Canal Lombaire,” Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique, 1988, pp. 15-22. |
Senegas et al., “Stabilisation Lombaire Souple,” Instabilité Vertébrales Lombaires, Gastambide, ed., 1995, pp. 122-132, Expansion Scientifique Française, Paris, France. |
Senegas, “La Ligamentoplastie Inter Vertébrale Lombaire, Alternative a L'Arthrodèse,” La Revue de Medecine Orthopédique, Jun. 1990, pp. 33-35, No. 20. |
Senegas, “La Ligamentoplastie Intervertébrale, Alternative à L'arthrodèse dans le Traitement des Instabilités Dégéneratives,” Acta Othopaedica Belgica, 1991, pp. 221-226, vol. 57, Suppl. I. |
Senegas, “Mechanical Supplementation by Non-Rigid Fixation in Degenerative Intervertebral Lumbar Segments: the Wallis System,” Eur. Spine J., 2002, p. S164-S169, vol. 11, Suppl. 2. |
Senegas, “Rencontre,” Maîstrise Orthopédique, May 1995, pp. 1-3, No. 44. |
Serhan, “Spinal Implants: Past, Present, and Future,” 19th International IEEE/EMBS Conference, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 1997, pp. 2636-2639, Chicago, Illinois. |
Spadea et al., “Interspinous Fusion for the Treatment of Herniated Intervertebral Discs: Utilizing a Lumbar Spinous Process as a Bone Graft,” Annals of Surgery, 1952, pp. 982-986, vol. 136, No. 6. |
Sulzer Innotec, “DIAM—Modified Cad Geometry and Meshing,” date unknown. |
Taylor et al., “Analyse d'une expérience clinique d'un implant postérieur amortissant,” Rachis Revue de Pathologie Vertébrale, Oct./Nov. 1999, vol. 11, No. 4-5, Gieda Inter Rachis. |
Taylor et al., “Surgical Requirement for the Posterior Control of the Rotational Centers,” date unknown. |
Taylor et al., “Technical and Anatomical Considerations for the Placement of a Posterior Interspinous Stabilizer,” 2004, pp. 1-10, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Memphis, Tennessee. |
Taylor, “Biomechanical Requirements for the Posterior Control of the Centers of Rotation,” Swiss Spine Institute International Symposium: Progress in Spinal Fixation, Jun. 21-22, 2002, pp. 1-2, Swiss Spine Institute, Bern, Switzerland. |
Taylor, “Non-Fusion Technologies of the Posterior Column: A New Posterior Shock Absorber,” International Symposium on Intervertebral Disc Replacement and Non-Fusion-Technology, May 3-5, 2001, Spine Arthroplasty. |
Taylor, “Posterior Dynamic Stabilization using the DIAM (Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion),” date unknown, pp. 1-5. |
Taylor, “Présentation à un an d'un dispositif amortissant d'assistance discale,” 5èmes journées Avances & Controverses en pathologie rachidienne, Oct. 1-2, 1998, Faculté Libre de Médecine de Lille. |
Tsuji et al., “Ceramic Interspinous Block (CISB) Assisted Anterior Interbody Fusion,” J. Spinal Disorders, 1990, pp. 77-86, vol. 3, No. 1. |
Vangilder, “Interspinous, Laminar, and Facet Posterior Cervical Bone Fusions,” Techniques in Spinal Fusion and Stabilization, Hitchon et al., eds., 1995, pp. 135-146, Ch. 13, Thieme, New York. |
Voydeville et al., “Experimental Lumbar Instability and Artificial Ligament,” Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., Jul. 15, 2000, pp. 167-176, vol. 10. |
Voydeville et al., “Lumbar Instability Treated by Intervertebral Ligamentoplasty with Smooth Wedges,” Orthopédie Traumatologie, 1992, pp. 259-264, vol. 2, No. 4. |
Waldemar Link, “Spinal Surgery: Instrumentation and Implants for Spinal Surgery,” 1981, Link America Inc., New Jersey. |
Wiltse et al., “The Treatment of Spinal Stenosis,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Urist, ed., Mar.-Apr. 1976, pp. 83-91, No. 115. |
Wisneski et al., “Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis,” Seminars in Spine Surgery, Wiesel, ed., Jun. 1994, pp. 116-123, vol. 6, No. 2. |
Zdeblick et al., “Two-Point Fixation of the Lumbar Spine Differential Stability in Rotation,” Spine, 1991, pp. S298-S301, vol. 16, No. 6, Supplement. |
Zucherman et al., “Clinical Efficacy of Spinal Instrumentation in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease,” Spine, Jul. 1992, pp. 834-837, vol. 17, No. 7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100174316 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60472817 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10850267 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 12725129 | US |