Not Applicable.
The present disclosure relates to the field of locksets for doors. More specifically, it relates to keyed cylinder locksets having re-keyable or reprogrammable rotors.
Door lock mechanisms typically include a rotor mounted for rotation within a cylinder by means of a key that is shaped or “bitted” to match the coded tumblers within the rotor. One type of door lock mechanism includes a “re-keyable” rotor, wherein the rotor includes a mechanism that allows a user to reset the key coding tumblers within the rotor for “bitting” a new key without disassembling the rotor or removing the cylinder from the lock unit. This type of rotor is frequently called a “self-rekeying” rotor.
For some self-rekeying rotor technologies, the rotor must be rotated by the original key into a “programming” position (typically 180 degrees from the “home” position) in order for its tumblers to be encoded with the key bitting of the new key. However, in the normal operation, that is, rotating the rotor to lock or unlock the lockset, the rotor typically rotates through or past the programming position.
In the current state of the art, in order to prevent the rotor from being inadvertently reprogrammed, two types of keys are utilized. For normal operations, a key with a notch at the bottom of the blade is used. A protrusion in the cylinder is engaged in this notch to prevent the key from being removed as the rotor passes through the programming position. To reprogram the rotor, a programming key, characterized by material removed from the bottom of the key blade, is used. This “shaved” programming key is designed to pass over the protrusion in the cylinder as the rotor is rotated, and therefore it can be removed from the rotor when the rotor is in the programming position. A second “programming key” (shaved key) with the desired key cuts is then inserted into the rotor (while in the programming position) to encode the rotor with the new key bitting.
One of the challenges with the current technology is the cost and inconvenience of obtaining the second programming key. An alternative to the two key system is to remove the protrusion in the cylinder so that any bitted key common to the keyway in the rotor can be used to program it. However, with this alternative there is a possibility that the rotor could be inadvertently programmed during normal operation. Even with a two programming key system, the rotor passes through the programming position, making it possible for the rotor to be accidentally programmed should the user inadvertently pull the key slightly out of the rotor, thereby defeating the programming key requirement, and encoding the rotor with the wrong key bitting.
This disclosure relates to a re-keyable rotor for a door lock assembly. The rotor, which contains tumblers for encoding the key bitting, includes a mechanism that is operable to restrict the rotor from being rotated to the programming position during normal operation. When it is desired to re-program the rotor, the user activates a rotation release mechanism, enabling the rotor to be rotated to the programming position.
Broadly, the present disclosure relates to a re-keyable door lock assembly, comprising a rotor having a first end configured for receiving a key and a second end opposite the first end; an endpiece on the second end of the rotor; and a tailpiece having an actuation end, the tailpiece being configured for axial movement between a first axial position in which the actuation end engages the endpiece and a second axial position in which the actuation end is disengaged from the endpiece, wherein the tailpiece is rotatable by the rotor from an unlocked position to a unlocking position when the rotor is rotated by a first key having a first bitting pattern from a first rotational position to a second rotational position when the actuation end of the tailpiece is engaged with the endpiece, and wherein the rotor alone is rotatable past the second rotational position to a third rotational position (which is the programming position) only when the actuation end of the tailpiece is disengaged from the endpiece. When the rotor is in the third rotational (programming) position, the first key may be removed from the rotor and replaced by a second key having a second (different) bitting pattern, wherein the rotor is rotatable by the second key back to the second rotational position, at which point the actuation end of the tailpiece is re-engageable with the endpiece of the rotor.
The benefit of this arrangement is twofold. First, it eliminates the need for a separate programming key, saving the cost and the inconvenience of making the programming key. Second, the rotor is prevented from rotating to or through the programming position during normal operation (i.e., when the actuation end of the tailpiece is engaged with the endpiece of the rotor), thus greatly reducing the chance of the user accidentally reprogramming the rotor.
Exemplary embodiments are explained in more detail below with reference to the drawings, in which:
The rotor 20 includes a slotted opening (not shown), which is the entrance to a keyway for the insertion of a key 26 having a blade (not shown) that is cut or “bitted” to actuate the coded tumblers. An endpiece 28, fixed to the back or inner end of the rotor 20, is configured for disengageable co-engagement with a first or actuation end 30 of a tailpiece 32, as will be described below. The tailpiece 32 is biased axially outward (in the context of the lockset 10) into engagement with the endpiece 28 by a biasing mechanism. In a specific embodiment, the biasing mechanism may advantageously comprise, for example, a biasing element, such as a coil spring 33 disposed coaxially around the tailpiece 32 near the actuation end 30 thereof. The coil spring 33 has a first or outer end that is seated against the actuation end 30 of the tailpiece 32. The biasing element (e.g., the spring 33) is contained within a cylindrical housing 34 coaxially disposed on the tailpiece 32 and having an outer end with internal threads 35a that detachably couple with external threads 35b on the rotor 20 adjacent the endpiece 28. The inner end of the housing 34 defines an annular spring seat 36, against which the second or inner end of the spring 33 is seated. Thus, the spring 33, captured between spring seat 36 of the housing 34 (which, in turn, is fixed to the rotor 20) and the actuation end 30 of the tailpiece 32, urges the tailpiece 32 into operative engagement with the rotor endpiece 28.
The tailpiece 32 is otherwise conventionally configured for operative engagement with a door latch mechanism (see
In typical operation, the tailpiece 32 is rotatable either by the rotor 20 or the turnpiece 16 between a first (unlocked) rotational position and a second (locked) rotational position. In the first rotational position, the tailpiece 32 is in an unlocked engagement with the latching mechanism (not shown). In this position, the rotor 20, and thus the outside doorknob 18 to which it is fixed, may be turned to actuate the latch mechanism to open the door. The door is thus unlocked. The door can now be locked either (a) by manually rotating the turnpiece 16 to rotate the tailpiece 32 to its second rotational position, in which the tailpiece 32 is in a locked engagement with the latch mechanism, or (b) by using the key 26 to rotate the rotor 20 and the endpiece 28, thus rotating the tailpiece 32 to its second rotational position. With the tailpiece 32 in its second rotational position, the doorknobs 14, 18 are unable to be turned to actuate the latch mechanism, thereby locking the door.
The co-engagement of the endpiece 28 and the actuation end 30 of the tailpiece 32 is such that the tailpiece 32, once disengaged from the endpiece 28 (as will be described below), will only re-engage with the endpiece 28 when the rotor 20 is rotated to a predetermined rotational position. For example, the endpiece 28 and the actuation end 30 of the tailpiece 32 may be configured so that their re-engagement is possible only when the rotor 20 has been returned (counter-rotated) back at least to the second rotational position, or somewhere between the first and second rotational positions.
The interface between the endpiece 28 and the tailpiece 32 is configured to limit the rotation of the rotor 20. Thus, in the embodiment shown in
Under the force applied by the biasing element 33, the tailpiece 32 is axially biased to bring its actuation end 30 into engagement with the endpiece 28. With the tailpiece 32 and the endpiece 28 thus engaged, the rotation of the rotor 20 is limited by the stop element 40. In the illustrated example, in which the stop element 40 subtends about 30 degrees of arc, the rotation of the rotor 20 is limited to about 90 degrees in either direction. The limits of this rotational movement are, of course, a function of the configurations of the actuation end 30 and the stop element 40, and may be more or less than 90 degrees.
Another embodiment is shown in
Still another embodiment is shown in
All of the above embodiments of the interface between the rotor endpiece and the tailpiece permit the tailpiece, having been disengaged from the rotor endpiece as described below, to re-engage with the rotor, and specifically the rotor endpiece, only when the rotor is in a predefined rotational position, as described above. By using an endpiece with an asymmetric configuration, the tailpiece is unable to re-engage with the endpiece until the latter is in the predefined rotational orientation relative to the rotor endpiece. (The term “engage,” as applied to the relationship between the rotor endpiece and the actuation end of the tailpiece, is understood to mean an axial relationship between these elements in which the rotation of the tailpiece is limited by the stop element of the endpiece.)
A method by which the tailpiece may be disengaged from the rotor and, specifically, from the rotor endpiece, may be understood with reference to FIGS. 1 and 5A-5H. Because all of the above-described embodiments and their equivalents will be identical in operation, the description below will reference the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2A-2C, but it will apply equally to the other embodiments and any equivalents.
In a typical keyed cylinder lock construction, the tailpiece 32 is either assembled integrally with the inner end of the rotor 20 or with a rotor endpiece 28 that is fixed to the rotor 20, or it is positioned in the lock so as to be constantly engaged with the inner or back end of the rotor 20. In accordance with this disclosure, however, as shown in
When a force is applied to the tailpiece 32 in an axial direction away from the rotor 20 (i.e., against the bias of the biasing mechanism), the tailpiece 32 is moved axially away from the rotor 20, compressing the biasing element or spring 33 in the housing 34. This movement disengages the actuation end 30 of the tailpiece 32 from the rotor endpiece 28, allowing the rotor 20 to be rotated from a first or unlocked rotational position, past a second or locking rotational position, to a third or programming rotational position, at which the rotor 20 may be re-programmed (re-keyed) as described below. The rotor 20 is then returned (counter-rotated) back to a pre-defined rotational position (preferably the second rotational position), at which point the tailpiece 32 is released, whereupon the axial biasing force applied by the biasing element 33 returns the tailpiece to a position in which the actuation end 30 re-engages with the endpiece 28. The actuation end 30 and the endpiece 28 cannot re-engage until the rotor 20 is returned to the pre-defined re-engagement position after re-programming.
As shown in
With the new key 26′, the rotor 20 may be rotated, as shown in
The embodiments described in this disclosure are exemplary only. Variations and modifications of these embodiments may suggest themselves to those skilled in the pertinent arts, as may other embodiments equivalent to those explicitly disclosed herein. Such variations, modifications, and other embodiments are understood to be encompassed within the scope of this disclosure.
This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C §119(e), of US.. Provisional Application No. 61/736431, filed Dec. 12, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61736431 | Dec 2012 | US |