The present embodiments relate to dough extruders and methods, and more specifically to dough extruders and methods that can provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using a straight extended low-friction compression head and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to a laminar flow of the dough.
Dough based products, such as crackers, are generally produced by mixing ingredients to form dough, sheeting and cutting the dough sheet into pieces, then baking the pieces. The products may be produced from a dough sheet in many different shapes and sizes. Some dough based products, such as pretzels, can be produced by extruding continuous ropes. These products are generally puffed, and highly expanded, and do not provide a leavened, cracker texture and laminar cell structure (See generally, U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0055284 to Karwowski et al., which is incorporated herein by reference).
Attempts at cracker dough extrusions produced at room temperature (See, U.S. Pat. No. 5,695,804 to Hnat et al.) are known in the art. However, dough variations in the quality and quantity of gluten in the flour can be problematic. These variations can sometimes be controlled through the additions of various non-proteinaceous oxidizing and/or reducing agents such as sulfite, cysteine, and reduced glutathione. These agents can make dough softer, stickier, and less elastic.
Variations in dough extrusion can also affect product characteristics. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,240 to Aulik et al. describes a process of relaxing a ‘plastic mass’, here a potato based mass, by uniformly pushing the mass at a substantially constant rate through multiple smooth bore passageways of varying pressure (though all less than about 85 p.s.i.g.) followed by a ‘relaxation’ chamber.
High extrusion pressures can also affect product characteristics due to a change in air cells in dough. Generally, the greater the pressure, the lesser the degree of expansion upon subsequent baking or frying and the harder the texture of the cracker or snack.
Other extrusion factors can also be considered. Overworking of the gluten or protein in the dough can result in a ‘glassy’ product texture, rather than a crisp, cracker-like texture. Further, high extrusion temperatures can also result in substantial gelatinization of the starch, which can also lead to a glassy product. Karwowski, et al. describes extrusion pressures of most preferably 20 to 60 psi and temperature range most preferably less than about 100° F. to reduce this glassy texture of the cooked cheese cracker product.
One other important component in the production of an extruded dough is the shape and depth of an extruder die. For example, an in-feed cone having a convex taper and tubular body for the land (where the dough exits the extruder) to reduce dough pressure and friction is known, but can cause damage to certain types of dough structure.
Accordingly, there are provided herein embodiments that relate to dough extruders and methods, and specifically to dough extruders and methods that can provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using a straight extended low friction compression head and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to a laminar flow of the dough. The apparatus and methods can produce baked crackers or snacks having a non-glassy, crisp or crunchy cracker texture and a substantially uniform, un-puffed, leavened cracker cell structure from extrudable doughs without the need for high gluten content flours such as durum wheat or semolina.
In one form, an extruder is provided that includes a compression generator configured to extrude a plastic mass in a laminar flow in the range of about less than 120 psi; a compression chamber having an upstream opening to receive the plastic mass from the compression generator, at least a portion of an interior of the compression chamber having a coefficient of friction in the range of about 0.2 and 0.35; and a die plate attached to a downstream opening of the compression chamber, the die plate being horizontally aligned with the longitudinal axis of the compressive force and laminar flow of the plastic mass.
The die plate can have a plurality of lands across a front face and be oriented downstream of the compression generator at a distance to minimize turbulence and pulsing of the plastic mass while maintaining laminar flow and minimizing pressure drop, wherein the plastic mass exiting the lands maintains about 5 to 15 percent density uniformity of the extrusions across the front face. The orientation of the die plate can be determined by providing a first extension disposed between the compressive force and the compression chamber and a second extension between the compression chamber and the die plate, wherein each extension piece being about 40 to 60 percent of a length of compression chamber.
In one form, the extruder can provide a compression generator to provide a pressure in the compression chamber in the range of about 70 to 95 psi and can provide compressive force using a pair of augers rotating inwardly toward each other and out-of-phase.
In one form, the extruder can have a frame, a dough hopper, a pre-feed box and an auger box. The compression chamber can include an upstream extension and a downstream extension each having in inner perimeter comprised of a thermoplastic polyoxymethylene. Additional features can include a water jacket to maintain the temperature of the plastic mass in the range of about 90 to 130° F., preferably about 99° F.
In one form, the die plate of the extruder can include a plurality of die holes, the die holes having (in order of flow) a first straight taper, a second concave inward taper, and a land section, the land being at least as long as a diameter of its opening. The land can be about 50 percent of the thickness of the die plate.
In one form, a method can be provided using the present extruder including the steps of admixing dough ingredients to a moisture content in the range of about 17 to 35 percent weight; permitting about 30 to 180 minutes of lay time for the dough to rest; delivering the dough to the extruder; applying a compressive force to the dough extruder in the range of about 70 to 95 psi; maintaining the dough in the extruder at a temperature in the range of about 90 to 130° F.; and extruding a continuous dough rope in a laminar flow. Lay time can be in the range of about 45 to 60 minutes and the step of maintaining temperature of the dough can be at about 99° F.
In one form, the plastic mass extruded through the present extruder can have a moisture content in the range of about 17 to 35 percent by weight, and preferably about 27 to 33 percent by weight. Additionally, the plastic mass can further have sodium-metabisulfite in a range of about 0.005 to about 0.015 percent weight, or in a sodium-metabisulfite to flour ratio in the range of about 0.1 oz per 100 pounds to 1 oz per 100 pounds. Preferably, the plastic mass can has a sodium-metabisulfite to flour ratio in the range of about 0.4 oz to 100 pounds.
In another form, a baked cracker from an extrusion of the present extruder can be formed by conveying an extruded dough rope to a conveyor; cutting the dough rope into a dough piece of a desired length of the cracker; and baking the dough piece for 6 to 10 minutes to a temperature in a range of about 195 to 215° F.
In yet another form, a method for extruding a dough can include providing a dough having a water content of about 17 to about 35 weight percent; compressing the dough in an extruder to a pressure of about 70 to about 95 psi; passing the dough through a compression chamber of the extruder, at least a portion of the compression chamber having coefficient of friction of about 0.2 to about 0.35; and extruding the dough through a die in a laminar flow to produce a dough rope having a substantially uniform density, the die having a thickness and including a plurality of openings each having a land area length, the land area length being in the range of about 40 to about 60 percent of the die thickness.
Other features will become more apparent to persons having ordinary skill in the art to which pertains from the following description and claims.
The foregoing features, as well as other features, will become apparent with reference to the description and figures below, in which like numerals represent elements, and in which:
The embodiments described below provide dough extruders and methods, and specifically dough extruders and methods that can provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using an extended low friction compression head and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to the laminar flow of the dough.
Generally, the present extruder embodiments can add extensions with low friction interior surfaces to the input and/or output of its compression chamber. The effect of the extensions increases compression chamber length, thereby increasing residence time of the dough in the chamber. This improves laminar flow, which reduces dough turbulence and allows dough pressure to equilibrate before it is extruded through a die plate. Further, by including at least a portion of the chamber with low friction surfaces, drag, and thus the pressure gradient across the extruder, may be lowered. Generally, dough pressure in the compression chamber should be less than about 120 psi, and preferably in the range of about 70 to 95 psi, and most preferably in the range of 90 to 95 PSI.
The present embodiments are shown using augers to generate the compressive force, though the dough may be alternately pumped using a displacement pump. In some embodiments pre-feed rollers (optionally corrugated) can deliver the dough from a hopper to the augers.
Also, the present embodiments allow a lowered dough temperature during extrusion than is typically known in the art. This improvement reduces or prevents damage to the dough starch and gluten chains, thus reducing the potential for a glassy texture to the final cooked dough based product.
Additionally, the present embodiments provide a novel die plate designed to have a narrower depth width (i.e., a shorter extrusion opening length in the die plate), and a two row staggered opening arrangement. The die plate extrusion openings can be highly polished with a concave inwards taper to facilitate laminar flow of the dough and to deduce pressure drop across the die face. Thus, the die plate is preferably horizontally aligned with the longitudinal axis of the screws and the laminar flow, unlike known die plates aligned generally diagonally to the laminar flow. The die plate insures uniform internal cell structure of that dough as it is extruded into continuous ropes.
The present embodiments may be suitable for any number of plastic masses. Preferably though, the present extruder embodiments may be used for food based doughs that are forced out of the die to form continuous shaped rope. As presented, the extruder may provide a ‘laminar flow’ for a cracker dough. In fluid dynamics, laminar flow can be defined as a flow regime characterized by high momentum diffusion and low momentum convection. In food based doughs, a good laminar flow and reduced pressure may provide for a finished cooked product that is crunchy, less dense and not glassy. In other words, the final product can provide organoleptic properties typically found for cracker products.
A typical cracker dough suitable for the present embodiments can be in the range of about 17 to 35 percent moisture, and preferably in the range of about 27 to 33, and most preferably about 30 percent moisture. It can be difficult to achieve a good laminar flow for this type of dough. Nevertheless, the cooked dough for the extruder of the present embodiments does not ‘shatter’ in a consumer's mouth (such as is typical for extruded pretzel dough based products). Pretzel dough can typically be about 30 to 45 percent moisture.
Further, the extruded dough of the present embodiments has a visually uniform internal cell structure. The dough flows through the extruder system without substantially overworking the gluten network/structure of the dough, which can result in a product that has fine uniformly sized bubble cells in the finished product. For example, when a dough is extruded, gluten strands align in the extrusion direction. If the extrusion pressure is too high (such as greater than 120 psi), a structural collapse or destruction of the cell structure can occur resulting in increased density of the dough. This translates to an undesirable hard, glassy, gritty texture in the final baked product. This is undesirable for cracker type product applications where a crisp, non-vitreous substantially homogeneous texture is preferred.
Thus, the presented combination of a high throughput, low pressure extrusion, with a resultant low pressure drop from the compression chamber to the die plate provides a minimized dough weight variation to approximately 0.7 grams per piece which has a targeted dough weight of 2.1 grams per piece for 2.5 inch length or 2.52 grams per piece for a 3.0 inch length dough stick.
Turning now to the figures, a twin auger (screw) extruder suitable for a plastic mass, such as a dough, is generally indicated at 10 in
As shown in
Specifically, as shown in
From hopper 12, dough can be delivered to the optional pre-feed box 14. As shown in
Next, feed rollers can deliver dough to an auger box 18 to develop a compressive force to move the dough into compression chamber 24. As shown in
Next, the dough can be delivered by auger box 18 to compression chamber 24. Compression chamber 24 may include the upstream extension piece 20 and/or the downstream extension piece 22. The extension pieces 20 and 22 are low friction extension pieces and can be sized to provide the desired laminar flow for the dough to be extruded. In one embodiment, each extension 20 and 22 can be about 3 to 4 inches in length, compared to the compression chamber length of about 8.5 inches. The internal walls of the extension pieces 20 and 22, as well as the jacketed compression head chamber, should be manufactured as smooth as possible with non-restrictive transitions. The overall result of using the extension pieces 20 and 22 permits for a lower coefficient of drag on the raw dough. This in turn reduces frictional losses, which significantly lowers the pressure drop between the screws 46 and the die plate 30, which improves finished product texture and weight variation. The extension pieces 20 and 22 may reduce dough turbulence by providing additional residence time for the internal pressures of the compression chamber 24 to equilibrate prior to being extruded. The extension pieces 20 and 22 may allow a laminar flow of the dough, which significantly reduces dough chamber pressure (70 to 95 p.s.i. and preferably 90 to 95 p.s.i.) than typically found for this type of application.
In a preferred embodiment, an interior surface of extension pieces 20 and 22 has a low coefficient of friction through the use of various low friction materials such as a synthetic polymer. Specifically, embodiments can use a thermoplastic polyoxymethylene (commonly referred to as POM and also known as polyacetal or polyformaldehyde) to provide a low coefficient of friction. POM provides a high stiffness, low friction and dimensional stability.
An exemplary POM can be one sold under the trade name DELRIN, by DuPont. The extension pieces 20 and 22 can be made entirely of DELRIN, or lined with DELRIN. In any event, the low friction of the extension pieces 20 and 22 should provide a coefficient of friction preferably between 0.2 and 0.35, compared to, for example, the coefficient of friction of the rest of the extruder of 0.7 to 0.8. This can be accomplished through the interior surfaces made from stainless steel.
Further, dough composition can also be adjusted by water, starch, and sodium metabisulphite (a starch expander) to increase dough lubricity to assure the coefficient of friction remains with the preferred range. For example, sodium metabisulphate can be in the range of about 0.005 to about 0.015 percent of dough weight. Alternately sodium metabisulphite can be a ratio in the range of about 0.1 oz per 100 lbs of flour to about 1 oz per 100 lbs of flour. In one preferred embodiment sodium metabisulphite can be about 0.4 oz per 100 lbs of flour. The low coefficient of friction reduces pressure drop and results in a less glassy texture of the cooked dough.
Additional aspects of an exemplary pressure chamber 24 between extensions 20 and 22 are more clearly illustrated in
Compression section 24 can also have an optional water jacket cavity to provide temperature regulation and maintenance of the dough. Water can enter and exit the compression section 24 at water jacket at ports 36. To maintain the desired temperature and pressure of the dough within the compression chamber, a temperature gauge (preferably positioned on the first extension 20 as temperature gauge 29 and alternatively positioned on compression chamber 24 as temperature gauge 28 (both shown) and pressure gauge 26 can be provided. The gauges can provide information to a controller (not shown) to regulate the flow and temperature of water within the jackets, and to drives 34 and 35 to regulate pressure. It is noted that the pressure gauge can be a diaphragm sensor so as not to affect laminar flow.
As illustrated in
As shown in
Typically the design of die openings 72 should account for the open area of the product extruded and the length and shape machined in the openings of the die plate 30. Surface texture of the product is a function of the orifice openings 72. The provided embodiments have a depth of a “land” area needed to form a laminar flow within the dough. If the dough does not achieve laminar flow, the dough tends to peel back at the orifice opening 72 resulting is a rough product surface. The land depth is typically as long as the width or diameter of the orifice opening 72.
Die plate 30 extrusion openings 72 can be a staggered pattern to maximize the number of openings 72. Further, the higher the number of die plate extrusion openings 72, the lower the pressure drop through the extruder 10. The limit is based on the spacing to the extruded dough ropes. For extruded dough products, the distance between the extruded dough ropes must be sufficient to allow proper spacing for even baking. The stagger (see dimension 96 and 98 in
The present embodiments require a dough that has a lubricity and moisture content to allow extrusion like a cracker dough. Table 1 provides exemplary dough embodiments suitable for use within the present embodiments.
In one approach, 0.4 oz per 100 lbs of flour of sodium metabisulfite is preferred. The exemplary dough provides a cracker like texture when tested under a three point bend measurement. The test measured the peak force needed to break a cracker stick cooked from dough extruded in an extruder 10 of the present embodiments. Supports for the test were set at 60 mm apart, top center to top center, with a test speed of 0.5 mm/sec, an auto trigger at 10 g force, and a test distance of 5 mm to failure.
Table 2 shows exemplary test conditions and Table 3, the results.
The following is an exemplary method to manufacture and extrude a dough according to the present embodiments. First, the dough ingredients (such as found in Table 1) can be admixed in a standard upright mixer. Upon mixing, the dough is placed in a dough trough or lay time conveyor for approximately 30 to 180 minutes (preferably about 45 to 60 minutes) of lay time (water hydration equilibration). The dough can then be transferred from the dough trough to hopper 12 of extruder 10.
In a multi-head extruder 10, such as found in
Once dough ropes 88 are formed, they can be deposited onto an extruder out feed conveyor 86, which is preferably designed with height adjustment. Next the ropes 88 are cut by cutter 92 to form dough pieces 90 (such as in 3 inch lengths) while maintaining length dough weight consistency across the conveyor and in the direction of product travel. During the cutting cycle, cutter 92 can slightly travel in the direction of travel prior to retracting to the up position to provide a uniform cut at the ends of the dough piece/stick.
Next, the product can be placed into an oven and baked, for example 6 to 10 minutes (preferably about 8 minutes) so that they emerge at a temperature in the range of about 195 to 215° F. (preferably about 212° F.).
The product can then be placed in an oiler or a tumbler where only a portion of the proper amount of oil will be applied. The cut baked pieces are then optionally salted or seasoned. It is noted though that seasoning preferably occurs at the mixing step.
Next, the cooked product can be cooled by using refrigerated cooling which is preferred to be around a product temperature of 90-110° F., then packaged.
While the products and methods have been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Appl. No. 61/326,373, filed Apr. 21, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4212840 | Cliff et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4752205 | Moriyama et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4790996 | Roush et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4795647 | Leibfred | Jan 1989 | A |
4834996 | Fazzolare et al. | May 1989 | A |
4837112 | Calandro et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4851248 | Simelunas et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4880653 | Keller et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4910040 | Sagarino et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4948602 | Boehm et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4949630 | Knebl | Aug 1990 | A |
4959240 | Aulik et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4988276 | Moeller | Jan 1991 | A |
4990348 | Spratt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5035906 | Persson et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5061507 | Aulik et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5089284 | Irvin et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5120559 | Rizvi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5149555 | Flindall | Sep 1992 | A |
5205206 | Kitama et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213026 | House | May 1993 | A |
5223296 | van der Wansem et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5333538 | Sawa | Aug 1994 | A |
5340598 | Hay, Jr. et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5350589 | Weinstein et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5382443 | Kincaid et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5447348 | Lapierre | Sep 1995 | A |
5469780 | Yamaguchi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5652009 | Mair | Jul 1997 | A |
5681605 | Takemori et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5686128 | Tracy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695804 | Hnat et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5776534 | Christensen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783241 | Bocabeille et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786020 | Reimerdes et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6054166 | Dupart | Apr 2000 | A |
6180158 | Zietlow et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6197355 | Zietlow et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6267998 | Bauman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276919 | Jensen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296465 | Deutsch et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309686 | Zietlow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338867 | Lihotzsky Vaupel | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6375997 | Sheen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419972 | Akimoto et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450796 | Groff et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460736 | D'Agostino | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506401 | Rothamel et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517903 | Schmidt | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6626660 | Olson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6712595 | Horna et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6753023 | Hammond | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6830768 | Neidlinger et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7318720 | Pabedinskas | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20010001675 | Akutagawa | May 2001 | A1 |
20020012722 | Prosise et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020037352 | Messager et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020071892 | Malfait | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020136812 | Degady et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030008032 | Walker et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030035876 | Kostival et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044489 | Waszyk et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030143295 | Howsam | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152667 | Goedeken et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030215552 | Hashimoto et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040037926 | Akimoto et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040170751 | Roy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197454 | Henry et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050048180 | Moore et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050136158 | Paparo | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050260317 | Cotten et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260326 | Kageyama et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266112 | Che | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050271785 | Hayes-Jacobson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060068062 | Newman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060088641 | Wendel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060233937 | Nassar et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060286271 | Villagran | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070031575 | Green et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070098865 | Hosokawa | May 2007 | A1 |
20070243301 | Barnett et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080038416 | Burgess et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080199569 | Baumeister et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080199582 | Unger | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080241327 | Hunter | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090017169 | Assaad et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029018 | Elejalde et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090123633 | Cleenewerck et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100055284 | Karwowski et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100209580 | Unlu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0312391 | Apr 1980 | EP |
0162675 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0340775 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0130748 | Jan 1990 | EP |
0163575 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0359375 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0230830 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0130772 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0181821 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0168255 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0510320 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0203771 | Jan 1994 | EP |
0614334 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0710448 | May 1996 | EP |
0770335 | May 1997 | EP |
0812545 | Dec 1997 | EP |
0874552 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0830067 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1036500 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1147715 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1219177 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1247454 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1443823 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1311166 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1119345 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2212096 | Jul 1989 | GB |
2228173 | Aug 1990 | GB |
2395164 | May 2004 | GB |
2453202 | Apr 2009 | GB |
64-047349 | Feb 1989 | JP |
3-210171 | Sep 1991 | JP |
4-262746 | Sep 1992 | JP |
5-064549 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-308905 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6-78680 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6-209728 | Aug 1994 | JP |
6-276921 | Oct 1994 | JP |
7-322809 | Dec 1995 | JP |
8-276488 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9-51789 | Feb 1997 | JP |
9-140321 | Jun 1997 | JP |
9-191859 | Jul 1997 | JP |
9-239804 | Sep 1997 | JP |
10-179064 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10-191952 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11-046688 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-075746 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2002-199871 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-325538 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-18970 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003189787 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-333978 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-033113 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-166602 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2005-027586 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-151979 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006-158282 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-211930 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007-274914 | Oct 2007 | JP |
8806001 | Aug 1988 | WO |
9014768 | Dec 1990 | WO |
9014769 | Dec 1990 | WO |
9104671 | Apr 1991 | WO |
9310662 | Jun 1993 | WO |
9402038 | Feb 1994 | WO |
9604799 | Feb 1996 | WO |
9725871 | Jul 1997 | WO |
9953774 | Oct 1999 | WO |
0004784 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0103517 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0228208 | Apr 2002 | WO |
03039261 | May 2003 | WO |
03086094 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03105593 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004032636 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005027649 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2005117601 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006138705 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007020345 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008012424 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008012424 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008040705 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008104709 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2008142313 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2010034981 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European search report by European Patent Office dated Mar. 14, 2014 for Aplication No. 11163054.7 (6 pgs.). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110262611 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61326373 | Apr 2010 | US |