Dough extruders and methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8926308
  • Patent Number
    8,926,308
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 13, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A dough extruder is disclosed that is configured to provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using a straight extended low friction compression chamber and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to a laminar flow of the dough. In one embodiment, the extruder can have a compressive force sufficient to extrude a plastic mass in a laminar flow in the range of about less than 120 psi; a compression chamber providing for an interior coefficient of friction in the range of about 0.2 and 0.35; and a die plate horizontally aligned with the longitudinal axis of the compressive force.
Description
FIELD

The present embodiments relate to dough extruders and methods, and more specifically to dough extruders and methods that can provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using a straight extended low-friction compression head and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to a laminar flow of the dough.


BACKGROUND

Dough based products, such as crackers, are generally produced by mixing ingredients to form dough, sheeting and cutting the dough sheet into pieces, then baking the pieces. The products may be produced from a dough sheet in many different shapes and sizes. Some dough based products, such as pretzels, can be produced by extruding continuous ropes. These products are generally puffed, and highly expanded, and do not provide a leavened, cracker texture and laminar cell structure (See generally, U.S. Pub. No. 2010/0055284 to Karwowski et al., which is incorporated herein by reference).


Attempts at cracker dough extrusions produced at room temperature (See, U.S. Pat. No. 5,695,804 to Hnat et al.) are known in the art. However, dough variations in the quality and quantity of gluten in the flour can be problematic. These variations can sometimes be controlled through the additions of various non-proteinaceous oxidizing and/or reducing agents such as sulfite, cysteine, and reduced glutathione. These agents can make dough softer, stickier, and less elastic.


Variations in dough extrusion can also affect product characteristics. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,240 to Aulik et al. describes a process of relaxing a ‘plastic mass’, here a potato based mass, by uniformly pushing the mass at a substantially constant rate through multiple smooth bore passageways of varying pressure (though all less than about 85 p.s.i.g.) followed by a ‘relaxation’ chamber.


High extrusion pressures can also affect product characteristics due to a change in air cells in dough. Generally, the greater the pressure, the lesser the degree of expansion upon subsequent baking or frying and the harder the texture of the cracker or snack.


Other extrusion factors can also be considered. Overworking of the gluten or protein in the dough can result in a ‘glassy’ product texture, rather than a crisp, cracker-like texture. Further, high extrusion temperatures can also result in substantial gelatinization of the starch, which can also lead to a glassy product. Karwowski, et al. describes extrusion pressures of most preferably 20 to 60 psi and temperature range most preferably less than about 100° F. to reduce this glassy texture of the cooked cheese cracker product.


One other important component in the production of an extruded dough is the shape and depth of an extruder die. For example, an in-feed cone having a convex taper and tubular body for the land (where the dough exits the extruder) to reduce dough pressure and friction is known, but can cause damage to certain types of dough structure.


SUMMARY

Accordingly, there are provided herein embodiments that relate to dough extruders and methods, and specifically to dough extruders and methods that can provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using a straight extended low friction compression head and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to a laminar flow of the dough. The apparatus and methods can produce baked crackers or snacks having a non-glassy, crisp or crunchy cracker texture and a substantially uniform, un-puffed, leavened cracker cell structure from extrudable doughs without the need for high gluten content flours such as durum wheat or semolina.


In one form, an extruder is provided that includes a compression generator configured to extrude a plastic mass in a laminar flow in the range of about less than 120 psi; a compression chamber having an upstream opening to receive the plastic mass from the compression generator, at least a portion of an interior of the compression chamber having a coefficient of friction in the range of about 0.2 and 0.35; and a die plate attached to a downstream opening of the compression chamber, the die plate being horizontally aligned with the longitudinal axis of the compressive force and laminar flow of the plastic mass.


The die plate can have a plurality of lands across a front face and be oriented downstream of the compression generator at a distance to minimize turbulence and pulsing of the plastic mass while maintaining laminar flow and minimizing pressure drop, wherein the plastic mass exiting the lands maintains about 5 to 15 percent density uniformity of the extrusions across the front face. The orientation of the die plate can be determined by providing a first extension disposed between the compressive force and the compression chamber and a second extension between the compression chamber and the die plate, wherein each extension piece being about 40 to 60 percent of a length of compression chamber.


In one form, the extruder can provide a compression generator to provide a pressure in the compression chamber in the range of about 70 to 95 psi and can provide compressive force using a pair of augers rotating inwardly toward each other and out-of-phase.


In one form, the extruder can have a frame, a dough hopper, a pre-feed box and an auger box. The compression chamber can include an upstream extension and a downstream extension each having in inner perimeter comprised of a thermoplastic polyoxymethylene. Additional features can include a water jacket to maintain the temperature of the plastic mass in the range of about 90 to 130° F., preferably about 99° F.


In one form, the die plate of the extruder can include a plurality of die holes, the die holes having (in order of flow) a first straight taper, a second concave inward taper, and a land section, the land being at least as long as a diameter of its opening. The land can be about 50 percent of the thickness of the die plate.


In one form, a method can be provided using the present extruder including the steps of admixing dough ingredients to a moisture content in the range of about 17 to 35 percent weight; permitting about 30 to 180 minutes of lay time for the dough to rest; delivering the dough to the extruder; applying a compressive force to the dough extruder in the range of about 70 to 95 psi; maintaining the dough in the extruder at a temperature in the range of about 90 to 130° F.; and extruding a continuous dough rope in a laminar flow. Lay time can be in the range of about 45 to 60 minutes and the step of maintaining temperature of the dough can be at about 99° F.


In one form, the plastic mass extruded through the present extruder can have a moisture content in the range of about 17 to 35 percent by weight, and preferably about 27 to 33 percent by weight. Additionally, the plastic mass can further have sodium-metabisulfite in a range of about 0.005 to about 0.015 percent weight, or in a sodium-metabisulfite to flour ratio in the range of about 0.1 oz per 100 pounds to 1 oz per 100 pounds. Preferably, the plastic mass can has a sodium-metabisulfite to flour ratio in the range of about 0.4 oz to 100 pounds.


In another form, a baked cracker from an extrusion of the present extruder can be formed by conveying an extruded dough rope to a conveyor; cutting the dough rope into a dough piece of a desired length of the cracker; and baking the dough piece for 6 to 10 minutes to a temperature in a range of about 195 to 215° F.


In yet another form, a method for extruding a dough can include providing a dough having a water content of about 17 to about 35 weight percent; compressing the dough in an extruder to a pressure of about 70 to about 95 psi; passing the dough through a compression chamber of the extruder, at least a portion of the compression chamber having coefficient of friction of about 0.2 to about 0.35; and extruding the dough through a die in a laminar flow to produce a dough rope having a substantially uniform density, the die having a thickness and including a plurality of openings each having a land area length, the land area length being in the range of about 40 to about 60 percent of the die thickness.


Other features will become more apparent to persons having ordinary skill in the art to which pertains from the following description and claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURE

The foregoing features, as well as other features, will become apparent with reference to the description and figures below, in which like numerals represent elements, and in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of an exemplary extruder;



FIG. 2 illustrates a top section view of an exemplary auger box of the extruder of FIG. 1, taken along section line A-A;



FIG. 3 illustrates a view of an upstream face of an exemplary upstream extension piece of a straight head compression section;



FIG. 4 illustrates a side view of an exemplary upstream extension piece of a straight head compression section perpendicular to the view of FIG. 3;



FIG. 5 illustrates a top view of a straight head compression section;



FIG. 6 illustrates a side view of the straight head compression section of FIG. 5;



FIG. 7 illustrates a side view of a downstream face of a downstream plate for a straight head compression section;



FIG. 8 illustrates a side view of an upstream face of an upstream plate for a straight head compression section;



FIG. 9 illustrates a face view of an exemplary downstream extension piece of a straight head compression section;



FIG. 10 illustrates a side view of the exemplary upstream extension piece of a straight head compression section of perpendicular to the view of FIG. 9;



FIG. 11 illustrates a view (feed in) of an upstream face of an exemplary die plate of the present embodiments;



FIG. 12 illustrates a view (discharge) of a downstream face of an exemplary die plate;



FIG. 13 illustrates a cross-sectional view of the exemplary die plate taken along section line B-B of FIG. 11;



FIG. 14 illustrates a side view of an exemplary die plate perpendicular to the side view of FIG. 11;



FIG. 15 illustrates a perspective view of an alternate embodiment of a straight multi-head compression section; and



FIG. 16 illustrates a perspective view of the exemplary extruder of FIG. 1, showing extruded product and product cutting.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments described below provide dough extruders and methods, and specifically dough extruders and methods that can provide a continuous dough rope suitable for cracker products using an extended low friction compression head and a die plate oriented substantially perpendicular to the laminar flow of the dough.


Generally, the present extruder embodiments can add extensions with low friction interior surfaces to the input and/or output of its compression chamber. The effect of the extensions increases compression chamber length, thereby increasing residence time of the dough in the chamber. This improves laminar flow, which reduces dough turbulence and allows dough pressure to equilibrate before it is extruded through a die plate. Further, by including at least a portion of the chamber with low friction surfaces, drag, and thus the pressure gradient across the extruder, may be lowered. Generally, dough pressure in the compression chamber should be less than about 120 psi, and preferably in the range of about 70 to 95 psi, and most preferably in the range of 90 to 95 PSI.


The present embodiments are shown using augers to generate the compressive force, though the dough may be alternately pumped using a displacement pump. In some embodiments pre-feed rollers (optionally corrugated) can deliver the dough from a hopper to the augers.


Also, the present embodiments allow a lowered dough temperature during extrusion than is typically known in the art. This improvement reduces or prevents damage to the dough starch and gluten chains, thus reducing the potential for a glassy texture to the final cooked dough based product.


Additionally, the present embodiments provide a novel die plate designed to have a narrower depth width (i.e., a shorter extrusion opening length in the die plate), and a two row staggered opening arrangement. The die plate extrusion openings can be highly polished with a concave inwards taper to facilitate laminar flow of the dough and to deduce pressure drop across the die face. Thus, the die plate is preferably horizontally aligned with the longitudinal axis of the screws and the laminar flow, unlike known die plates aligned generally diagonally to the laminar flow. The die plate insures uniform internal cell structure of that dough as it is extruded into continuous ropes.


The present embodiments may be suitable for any number of plastic masses. Preferably though, the present extruder embodiments may be used for food based doughs that are forced out of the die to form continuous shaped rope. As presented, the extruder may provide a ‘laminar flow’ for a cracker dough. In fluid dynamics, laminar flow can be defined as a flow regime characterized by high momentum diffusion and low momentum convection. In food based doughs, a good laminar flow and reduced pressure may provide for a finished cooked product that is crunchy, less dense and not glassy. In other words, the final product can provide organoleptic properties typically found for cracker products.


A typical cracker dough suitable for the present embodiments can be in the range of about 17 to 35 percent moisture, and preferably in the range of about 27 to 33, and most preferably about 30 percent moisture. It can be difficult to achieve a good laminar flow for this type of dough. Nevertheless, the cooked dough for the extruder of the present embodiments does not ‘shatter’ in a consumer's mouth (such as is typical for extruded pretzel dough based products). Pretzel dough can typically be about 30 to 45 percent moisture.


Further, the extruded dough of the present embodiments has a visually uniform internal cell structure. The dough flows through the extruder system without substantially overworking the gluten network/structure of the dough, which can result in a product that has fine uniformly sized bubble cells in the finished product. For example, when a dough is extruded, gluten strands align in the extrusion direction. If the extrusion pressure is too high (such as greater than 120 psi), a structural collapse or destruction of the cell structure can occur resulting in increased density of the dough. This translates to an undesirable hard, glassy, gritty texture in the final baked product. This is undesirable for cracker type product applications where a crisp, non-vitreous substantially homogeneous texture is preferred.


Thus, the presented combination of a high throughput, low pressure extrusion, with a resultant low pressure drop from the compression chamber to the die plate provides a minimized dough weight variation to approximately 0.7 grams per piece which has a targeted dough weight of 2.1 grams per piece for 2.5 inch length or 2.52 grams per piece for a 3.0 inch length dough stick.


Turning now to the figures, a twin auger (screw) extruder suitable for a plastic mass, such as a dough, is generally indicated at 10 in FIG. 1. The main components of extruder 10 can include a frame 32, a dough hopper 12, a pre-feed box 14, an auger box 18 (flight houses), a compression chamber 24 having an upstream (first) extension 20 and a downstream (second) extension 22, and a die plate 30. As shown in the Figure, the extensions about double the length of the distance from auger box 18 to die plate 30, each extension generally adding about 40 to 60 percent (and preferably about 50 percent) to each side of compression chamber 24. By way of illustration, upstream extension piece 20 can be about 4 inches in length, compression chamber 24 about 8.5 inches, and downstream extension piece 22 about 4 inches. In any event, the extensions are provided to extend the downstream distance from the generated compressive force to the front face of the die plate lands, as described below, to minimize turbulence and pulsing of the plastic mass while maintaining laminar flow and minimizing pressure drop. For example, it is preferable for the plastic mass to maintain about 5 to 15 percent density uniformity among the lands across the face of the die plate.


As shown in FIG. 16, extruded uncooked dough 88 can be delivered to a conveyor belt 86, traveling at substantially the same speed as the extrusions where it can be cut by a cutter 92 to provide a cut product 90, which is ready to deliver to an oven (not shown) for baking. Cutter 92 can be mechanical, such as a TEFLON coated spring steel blade or ultrasonic. An optional extruder embodiment shown in FIG. 15 shows an extruder having multiple compression modules generally shown at 84.


Specifically, as shown in FIG. 1, extruder 10 can receive an uncooked dough into hopper 12. On a multi compression head embodiments, such as shown in FIG. 15, multiple dough hoppers 12 can be present (not shown). Exemplary hopper 12 dimensions can be 12.5 inches square at the top tapering down to a dimension of 9.5 inches square at the bottom. Hopper 12 can be 20 inches in height.


From hopper 12, dough can be delivered to the optional pre-feed box 14. As shown in FIG. 1, pre-feed box 14 can have pre-feed rollers. The journals for pre-feed box 14 rollers are shown at 16. Pre-feed rollers can optionally be augers, made from polymers, and even corrugated to further work the dough as it moves through extruder 10. The pre-feed can be driven by a feed roller drive 35 and, in one form, can be operated up to about a maximum of 6 RPM.


Next, feed rollers can deliver dough to an auger box 18 to develop a compressive force to move the dough into compression chamber 24. As shown in FIG. 2, auger box 18 can have at least one auger 46 (two shown) having an auger fin 48. In embodiments where there are two augers 18, they are preferably rotated towards each other and out-of-phase to minimize dough pulsations. In one form, auger 46 can be around 4.0 to 4.5 inch in outer diameter. Auger box 18 can have an optional water jacket (cavity) to provide temperature regulation of the dough. Water can enter and exit the auger box water jacket at ports 94. Augers 46 can be driven by an auger drive 34 and operated at rate of up to a maximum of 35 RPM.


Next, the dough can be delivered by auger box 18 to compression chamber 24. Compression chamber 24 may include the upstream extension piece 20 and/or the downstream extension piece 22. The extension pieces 20 and 22 are low friction extension pieces and can be sized to provide the desired laminar flow for the dough to be extruded. In one embodiment, each extension 20 and 22 can be about 3 to 4 inches in length, compared to the compression chamber length of about 8.5 inches. The internal walls of the extension pieces 20 and 22, as well as the jacketed compression head chamber, should be manufactured as smooth as possible with non-restrictive transitions. The overall result of using the extension pieces 20 and 22 permits for a lower coefficient of drag on the raw dough. This in turn reduces frictional losses, which significantly lowers the pressure drop between the screws 46 and the die plate 30, which improves finished product texture and weight variation. The extension pieces 20 and 22 may reduce dough turbulence by providing additional residence time for the internal pressures of the compression chamber 24 to equilibrate prior to being extruded. The extension pieces 20 and 22 may allow a laminar flow of the dough, which significantly reduces dough chamber pressure (70 to 95 p.s.i. and preferably 90 to 95 p.s.i.) than typically found for this type of application.


In a preferred embodiment, an interior surface of extension pieces 20 and 22 has a low coefficient of friction through the use of various low friction materials such as a synthetic polymer. Specifically, embodiments can use a thermoplastic polyoxymethylene (commonly referred to as POM and also known as polyacetal or polyformaldehyde) to provide a low coefficient of friction. POM provides a high stiffness, low friction and dimensional stability.


An exemplary POM can be one sold under the trade name DELRIN, by DuPont. The extension pieces 20 and 22 can be made entirely of DELRIN, or lined with DELRIN. In any event, the low friction of the extension pieces 20 and 22 should provide a coefficient of friction preferably between 0.2 and 0.35, compared to, for example, the coefficient of friction of the rest of the extruder of 0.7 to 0.8. This can be accomplished through the interior surfaces made from stainless steel. FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate an exemplary extension 20 and 22 that can have generally oblong perimeters 50 and 68 respectively with no taper. The thermoplastic polyoxymethylene reduces compression drop and improves laminar flow and reduces turberlance. It allows easy product run set up do to its ease of machinability.


Further, dough composition can also be adjusted by water, starch, and sodium metabisulphite (a starch expander) to increase dough lubricity to assure the coefficient of friction remains with the preferred range. For example, sodium metabisulphate can be in the range of about 0.005 to about 0.015 percent of dough weight. Alternately sodium metabisulphite can be a ratio in the range of about 0.1 oz per 100 lbs of flour to about 1 oz per 100 lbs of flour. In one preferred embodiment sodium metabisulphite can be about 0.4 oz per 100 lbs of flour. The low coefficient of friction reduces pressure drop and results in a less glassy texture of the cooked dough.


Additional aspects of an exemplary pressure chamber 24 between extensions 20 and 22 are more clearly illustrated in FIGS. 5 through 8. Here pressure chamber 24 (which can also be referred to as a jacketed straight head compression section) has an upstream back plate 54 (shown more clearly in side view in FIG. 8). The perimeter opening 58 for back plate 54 matches the perimeter of extension 20 and can be mounted to extension 20 using mounting holes 66. The body of compression chamber 24 can reduce the perimeter of the opening to receive dough through reductions 38 and 40 to match the back perimeter opening in the front plate 56 (See FIG. 7 at 60). Front plate 56 further reduces the dough flow perimeter (See FIG. 7 at 62).


Compression section 24 can also have an optional water jacket cavity to provide temperature regulation and maintenance of the dough. Water can enter and exit the compression section 24 at water jacket at ports 36. To maintain the desired temperature and pressure of the dough within the compression chamber, a temperature gauge (preferably positioned on the first extension 20 as temperature gauge 29 and alternatively positioned on compression chamber 24 as temperature gauge 28 (both shown) and pressure gauge 26 can be provided. The gauges can provide information to a controller (not shown) to regulate the flow and temperature of water within the jackets, and to drives 34 and 35 to regulate pressure. It is noted that the pressure gauge can be a diaphragm sensor so as not to affect laminar flow.


As illustrated in FIGS. 11-14, die plate 30 can receive compressed dough from extension 22 for extrusion. Reducing the thickness of the die plate 30 is related to reducing the pressure drop. The thickness (shown at 31 in FIG. 13) can, for instance, be reduced to less than 1.0 inches, such as 0.63 inches or less. In one form, die plate land 80 (i.e., the straight/parallel section through the extrusion die) can have a thickness of not less than 0.22 inches, preferably in the range of 0.25 to 0.31 inches, most preferably at 0.26 and 0.28 inches (shown at 33 in FIG. 13). As shown, two rows of extrusion holes 72 are shown in a staggered pattern, though many hole patterns are possible within the presented embodiments. Optionally, the hole diameter (shown at 35 in FIG. 13) can also vary across the array to allow for any pressure variation across the die plate face. In one approach, hole diameter 35 can range from about 0.24 inches to about 0.281 inches.


As shown in FIG. 13, the present die holes 72 can have three different aspects to their respective geometries to provide desired laminar flow. In order of dough flow as indicated by the arrow in FIG. 13, an initial cone shaped straight taper 76 to 78 leading to a concave inward taper 82 followed by the land 80. As specifically illustrated, die plate 30 can be configured as a two row staggered pattern with 26 openings to maximize product loading into the oven as well as reducing the thickness of the die plate to a total depth of 0.625 inches, with land 80 representing about 50 of the thickness of the overall die plate 30. The die inlets are also highly polished to improve the pressure drop across the face of the die.


Typically the design of die openings 72 should account for the open area of the product extruded and the length and shape machined in the openings of the die plate 30. Surface texture of the product is a function of the orifice openings 72. The provided embodiments have a depth of a “land” area needed to form a laminar flow within the dough. If the dough does not achieve laminar flow, the dough tends to peel back at the orifice opening 72 resulting is a rough product surface. The land depth is typically as long as the width or diameter of the orifice opening 72.


Die plate 30 extrusion openings 72 can be a staggered pattern to maximize the number of openings 72. Further, the higher the number of die plate extrusion openings 72, the lower the pressure drop through the extruder 10. The limit is based on the spacing to the extruded dough ropes. For extruded dough products, the distance between the extruded dough ropes must be sufficient to allow proper spacing for even baking. The stagger (see dimension 96 and 98 in FIG. 11) is based on the feed in taper diameter 76. Die plate 30 is preferably oriented to be horizontal to the longitudinal axis of the augers 46 and the laminar flow. Thus, the orientation of dough ropes 88 is preferably horizontal (in line) to the laminar flow of the dough through the die plate 30 land.


The present embodiments require a dough that has a lubricity and moisture content to allow extrusion like a cracker dough. Table 1 provides exemplary dough embodiments suitable for use within the present embodiments.












TABLE 1









SUGAR
 7.00% to 10.00%



STARCH
1.00% to 4.00%



MONOCALCIUM PHOSPHATE (CAP)
0.20% to 0.50%



SODA BICARBONATE POWDER
0.10% to 0.20%



FLOUR
52.00% to 66.00%



SEASONING
1.50% to 4.00%



OIL
1.50% to 4.00%



BROWN SUGAR
0.50% to 2.00%



MALT SYRUP
2.00% to 3.00%



AMMONIA BICARBONATE
0.00% to 0.25%



SODIUM METABISULFITE
0.005% to 0.015%



WATER
17.00% to 35.00%











In one approach, 0.4 oz per 100 lbs of flour of sodium metabisulfite is preferred. The exemplary dough provides a cracker like texture when tested under a three point bend measurement. The test measured the peak force needed to break a cracker stick cooked from dough extruded in an extruder 10 of the present embodiments. Supports for the test were set at 60 mm apart, top center to top center, with a test speed of 0.5 mm/sec, an auto trigger at 10 g force, and a test distance of 5 mm to failure.


Table 2 shows exemplary test conditions and Table 3, the results.












TABLE 2









Variable
Length-



1
3.0″




Diameter-0.25″




Bake time-7 minutes




Moisture-2.47



Variable
Length-



2
3.0″




Diameter-0.25″




Bake time-7 minutes




Moisture-1.37



Variable
Length-



3
3.0″




Diameter-0.25″




Bake time-6 minutes




Moisture-1.67






















TABLE 3









Break
Break






force
force



Break
Break
Break
95% conf
95% conf



force
force
force
Lower
Upper


Sample
Grams
Std dev
95% conf
Limit
Limit







WTS v1
826
221
90
736
917


WTS v2
698
237
93
606
791


WTS v3
638
167
65
572
703









The following is an exemplary method to manufacture and extrude a dough according to the present embodiments. First, the dough ingredients (such as found in Table 1) can be admixed in a standard upright mixer. Upon mixing, the dough is placed in a dough trough or lay time conveyor for approximately 30 to 180 minutes (preferably about 45 to 60 minutes) of lay time (water hydration equilibration). The dough can then be transferred from the dough trough to hopper 12 of extruder 10.


In a multi-head extruder 10, such as found in FIG. 16, the dough is compressed using augers 46 into a homogeneous mass and extruded into 104 continuous ropes. Pre-feed augers can be located over each of the four sections of the extruder, which are used to minimize the weight variation by controlling the effect of head pressure and minimizing surges in the extrusion rate. The jacketed straight head compression chamber 24 and the jacketed auger box 18 can provide water to keep the dough temperature between 90 to 130° F. (and preferably about 99° F.). Pressure gauge 26 can monitor each compression head. Power monitors on augers 46 of each manifold tied to a control system and trended over time can track the dough ‘batch to batch’ variation in dough viscosity.


Once dough ropes 88 are formed, they can be deposited onto an extruder out feed conveyor 86, which is preferably designed with height adjustment. Next the ropes 88 are cut by cutter 92 to form dough pieces 90 (such as in 3 inch lengths) while maintaining length dough weight consistency across the conveyor and in the direction of product travel. During the cutting cycle, cutter 92 can slightly travel in the direction of travel prior to retracting to the up position to provide a uniform cut at the ends of the dough piece/stick.


Next, the product can be placed into an oven and baked, for example 6 to 10 minutes (preferably about 8 minutes) so that they emerge at a temperature in the range of about 195 to 215° F. (preferably about 212° F.).


The product can then be placed in an oiler or a tumbler where only a portion of the proper amount of oil will be applied. The cut baked pieces are then optionally salted or seasoned. It is noted though that seasoning preferably occurs at the mixing step.


Next, the cooked product can be cooled by using refrigerated cooling which is preferred to be around a product temperature of 90-110° F., then packaged.


While the products and methods have been described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description.

Claims
  • 1. An extruder, comprising: a compression generator configured to extrude a plastic mass in a laminar flow with a pressure in a range of less than 120 psi;a compression chamber having an upstream opening to receive the plastic mass from the compression generator, wherein at least a portion of an interior of the compression chamber having a coefficient of friction in a range of about 0.2 and 0.35;a die plate attached to a downstream opening of the compression chamber, the die plate being horizontally aligned with a longitudinal direction of a compressive force and the laminar flow of the plastic mass; andwherein the die plate has a plurality of lands across a front face and is oriented downstream of the compression generator at a distance to minimize turbulence and pulsing of the plastic mass while maintaining the laminar flow and minimizing a pressure drop, wherein the die plate is configured to maintain about 5 to 15 percent density uniformity of the plastic mass across the front face of the die plate.
  • 2. The extruder of claim 1, wherein an orientation of the die plate is determined by providing a first extension disposed between the compressive force and the compression chamber and a second extension between the compression chamber and the die plate, wherein a length of each extension piece is about 40 to 60 percent of a length of the compression chamber.
  • 3. The extruder of claim 1, wherein the compression generator provides a pressure in the compression chamber in a range of about 70 to 95 psi.
  • 4. The extruder of claim 1, wherein the compression generator comprises a pair of augers rotatable inwardly toward each other and out-of-phase.
  • 5. The extruder of claim 1, further comprising a frame, a dough hopper, a pre-feed box and an auger box, wherein the compression chamber includes an upstream extension and a downstream extension each having an inner perimeter comprised of a thermoplastic polyoxymethylene.
  • 6. The extruder of claim 1, further comprising a water jacket to maintain a temperature of the plastic mass in a range of about 90 to 130° F.
  • 7. The extruder of claim 1, further comprising a water jacket to maintain a temperature of the plastic mass of about 99° F.
  • 8. The extruder of claim 1, wherein the die plate has a plurality of die holes, the die holes having in order of flow, a first straight taper, a second concave inward taper, and a land section, wherein a land depth being at least as long as a diameter of a land opening.
  • 9. The extruder of claim 8, wherein a land area length is about 50 percent of a thickness of the die plate.
  • 10. The extruder of claim 1, wherein the die plate further is configured to extrude a plastic mass comprising sodium-metabisulfite in a range of about 0.005 to about 0.015 percent weight of the plastic mass.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Appl. No. 61/326,373, filed Apr. 21, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (90)
Number Name Date Kind
4212840 Cliff et al. Jul 1980 A
4752205 Moriyama et al. Jun 1988 A
4790996 Roush et al. Dec 1988 A
4795647 Leibfred Jan 1989 A
4834996 Fazzolare et al. May 1989 A
4837112 Calandro et al. Jun 1989 A
4851248 Simelunas et al. Jul 1989 A
4880653 Keller et al. Nov 1989 A
4910040 Sagarino et al. Mar 1990 A
4948602 Boehm et al. Aug 1990 A
4949630 Knebl Aug 1990 A
4959240 Aulik et al. Sep 1990 A
4988276 Moeller Jan 1991 A
4990348 Spratt et al. Feb 1991 A
5035906 Persson et al. Jul 1991 A
5061507 Aulik et al. Oct 1991 A
5089284 Irvin et al. Feb 1992 A
5120559 Rizvi et al. Jun 1992 A
5149555 Flindall Sep 1992 A
5205206 Kitama et al. Apr 1993 A
5213026 House May 1993 A
5223296 van der Wansem et al. Jun 1993 A
5333538 Sawa Aug 1994 A
5340598 Hay, Jr. et al. Aug 1994 A
5350589 Weinstein et al. Sep 1994 A
5382443 Kincaid et al. Jan 1995 A
5447348 Lapierre Sep 1995 A
5469780 Yamaguchi et al. Nov 1995 A
5652009 Mair Jul 1997 A
5681605 Takemori et al. Oct 1997 A
5686128 Tracy et al. Nov 1997 A
5695804 Hnat et al. Dec 1997 A
5776534 Christensen et al. Jul 1998 A
5783241 Bocabeille et al. Jul 1998 A
5786020 Reimerdes et al. Jul 1998 A
6054166 Dupart Apr 2000 A
6180158 Zietlow et al. Jan 2001 B1
6197355 Zietlow et al. Mar 2001 B1
6267998 Bauman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6276919 Jensen et al. Aug 2001 B1
6296465 Deutsch et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309686 Zietlow et al. Oct 2001 B1
6338867 Lihotzsky Vaupel Jan 2002 B1
6375997 Sheen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6419972 Akimoto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6450796 Groff et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460736 D'Agostino Oct 2002 B1
6506401 Rothamel et al. Jan 2003 B1
6517903 Schmidt Feb 2003 B1
6626660 Olson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6712595 Horna et al. Mar 2004 B2
6753023 Hammond Jun 2004 B2
6830768 Neidlinger et al. Dec 2004 B2
7318720 Pabedinskas Jan 2008 B2
20010001675 Akutagawa May 2001 A1
20020012722 Prosise et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020037352 Messager et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020071892 Malfait Jun 2002 A1
20020136812 Degady et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030008032 Walker et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030035876 Kostival et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030044489 Waszyk et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030143295 Howsam Jul 2003 A1
20030152667 Goedeken et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030215552 Hashimoto et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040037926 Akimoto et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040170751 Roy et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040197454 Henry et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050048180 Moore et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050136158 Paparo Jun 2005 A1
20050260317 Cotten et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050260326 Kageyama et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050266112 Che Dec 2005 A1
20050271785 Hayes-Jacobson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060068062 Newman Mar 2006 A1
20060088641 Wendel et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060233937 Nassar et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060286271 Villagran Dec 2006 A1
20070031575 Green et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070098865 Hosokawa May 2007 A1
20070243301 Barnett et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080038416 Burgess et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080199569 Baumeister et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080199582 Unger Aug 2008 A1
20080241327 Hunter Oct 2008 A1
20090017169 Assaad et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090029018 Elejalde et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090123633 Cleenewerck et al. May 2009 A1
20100055284 Karwowski et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100209580 Unlu et al. Aug 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (85)
Number Date Country
0312391 Apr 1980 EP
0162675 Nov 1989 EP
0340775 Nov 1989 EP
0130748 Jan 1990 EP
0163575 Feb 1990 EP
0359375 Mar 1990 EP
0230830 Apr 1991 EP
0130772 Jan 1992 EP
0181821 Jan 1992 EP
0168255 Sep 1992 EP
0510320 Oct 1992 EP
0203771 Jan 1994 EP
0614334 Sep 1994 EP
0710448 May 1996 EP
0770335 May 1997 EP
0812545 Dec 1997 EP
0874552 Nov 1998 EP
0830067 Apr 2000 EP
1036500 Sep 2000 EP
1147715 Oct 2001 EP
1219177 Jul 2002 EP
1247454 Oct 2002 EP
1443823 Aug 2004 EP
1311166 Sep 2006 EP
1119345 Apr 2009 EP
2212096 Jul 1989 GB
2228173 Aug 1990 GB
2395164 May 2004 GB
2453202 Apr 2009 GB
64-047349 Feb 1989 JP
3-210171 Sep 1991 JP
4-262746 Sep 1992 JP
5-064549 Mar 1993 JP
5-308905 Nov 1993 JP
6-78680 Mar 1994 JP
6-209728 Aug 1994 JP
6-276921 Oct 1994 JP
7-322809 Dec 1995 JP
8-276488 Oct 1996 JP
9-51789 Feb 1997 JP
9-140321 Jun 1997 JP
9-191859 Jul 1997 JP
9-239804 Sep 1997 JP
10-179064 Jul 1998 JP
10-191952 Jul 1998 JP
11-046688 Feb 1999 JP
11-075746 Mar 1999 JP
2002-199871 Jul 2002 JP
2002-325538 Nov 2002 JP
2003-18970 Jan 2003 JP
2003189787 Jul 2003 JP
2003-333978 Nov 2003 JP
2004-033113 Feb 2004 JP
2004-166602 Jun 2004 JP
2005-027586 Feb 2005 JP
2005-151979 Jun 2005 JP
2006-158282 Jun 2006 JP
2006-211930 Aug 2006 JP
2007-274914 Oct 2007 JP
8806001 Aug 1988 WO
9014768 Dec 1990 WO
9014769 Dec 1990 WO
9104671 Apr 1991 WO
9310662 Jun 1993 WO
9402038 Feb 1994 WO
9604799 Feb 1996 WO
9725871 Jul 1997 WO
9953774 Oct 1999 WO
0004784 Feb 2000 WO
0103517 Jan 2001 WO
0228208 Apr 2002 WO
03039261 May 2003 WO
03086094 Oct 2003 WO
03105593 Dec 2003 WO
2004032636 Apr 2004 WO
2005027649 Mar 2005 WO
2005117601 Dec 2005 WO
2006138705 Dec 2006 WO
2007020345 Feb 2007 WO
2008012424 Jan 2008 WO
2008012424 Jan 2008 WO
2008040705 Apr 2008 WO
2008104709 Sep 2008 WO
2008142313 Nov 2008 WO
2010034981 Apr 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Extended European search report by European Patent Office dated Mar. 14, 2014 for Aplication No. 11163054.7 (6 pgs.).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110262611 A1 Oct 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61326373 Apr 2010 US