Patent Grant
11004409
The present invention is directed to driving methods for color display devices to display high quality color states.
In order to achieve a color display, color filters are often used. The most common approach is to add color filters on top of black/white sub-pixels of a pixilated display to display the red, green and blue colors. When a red color is desired, the green and blue sub-pixels are turned to the black state so that the only color displayed is red. When a blue color is desired, the green and red sub-pixels are turned to the black state so that the only color displayed is blue. When a green color is desired, the red and blue sub-pixels are turned to the black state so that the only color displayed is green. When a black state is desired, all three-sub-pixels are turned to the black state. When a white state is desired, the three sub-pixels are turned to red, green and blue, respectively, and as a result, a white state is seen by the viewer.
The biggest disadvantage of such a technique is that since each of the sub-pixels has a reflectance of about one third (⅓) of the desired white state, the white state is fairly dim. To compensate this, a fourth sub-pixel may be added which can display only the black and white states, so that the white level is doubled at the expense of the red, green or blue color level (where each sub-pixel is now only one fourth of the area of the pixel). Brighter colors can be achieved by adding light from the white pixel, but this is achieved at the expense of color gamut to cause the colors to be very light and unsaturated. A similar result can be achieved by reducing the color saturation of the three sub-pixels. Even with these approaches, the white level is normally substantially less than half of that of a black and white display, rendering it an unacceptable choice for display devices, such as e-readers or displays that need well readable black-white brightness and contrast.
A first aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged. In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the amplitude of the first driving voltage. In one embodiment, steps (i) and (ii) are repeated at least 4 times. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform before step (i). In one embodiment, the method further comprises driving the pixel to the full color state of the first type of pigment particles after the shaking waveform but prior to step (i). In one embodiment, the first period of time is 40 to 140 msec, the second period of time is greater than or equal to 460 msec and steps (i) and (ii) are repeated at least seven times.
A second aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged. In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the amplitude of the first driving voltage. In one embodiment, steps (i), (ii) and (iii) are repeated at least 4 times. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform before step (i). In one embodiment, the method further comprises a driving step to the full color state of the first type of pigment particles after the shaking waveform but prior to step (i).
A third aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
A fourth aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged. In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the amplitude of the first driving voltage. In one embodiment, steps (i)-(iv) are repeated at least 3 times. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform before step (i). In one embodiment, the method further comprises driving the pixel to the full color state of the first type of pigment particles after the shaking waveform but prior to step (i).
A fifth aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the method further comprises a wait time where no driving voltage is applied. In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged. In one embodiment, the second period of time is at least twice as long as the first period of time. In one embodiment, steps (i) and (ii) are repeated for least three times. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform before step (i). In one embodiment, the method further comprises driving the pixel to the full color state of the second type of pigment particles after the shaking waveform but prior to step (i).
A sixth aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged. In one embodiment, steps (i), (ii) and (iii) are repeated at least three times. In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is same as that of the driving voltage required to drive the pixel from the color state of the first type of pigment particles to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, or vice versa. In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is higher than the amplitude of the driving voltage required to drive the pixel from the color state of the first type of pigment particles to the color stat of the second type of pigment particles, or vice versa. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform. In one embodiment, the method further comprises driving the pixel to the full color state of the first type of pigment particles after the shaking waveform but prior to step (i).
A seventh aspect of the present invention is directed to a driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged. In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the amplitude of the first driving voltage. In one embodiment, steps (i) and (ii) are repeated at least 4 times. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a shaking waveform before step (i). In one embodiment, the method further comprises driving the pixel to the full color state of the first type of pigment particles after the shaking waveform but prior to step (i).
The fourth driving method of the present invention may be applied to a pixel at a color state of the first type of pigment particles or may be applied to a pixel at a color state not the color state of the first type of pigment particles.
The present invention is directed to driving methods for color display devices.
The device utilizes an electrophoretic fluid is shown in
However, it is understood that the scope of the invention broadly encompasses pigment particles of any colors as long as the three types of pigment particles have visually distinguishable colors. Therefore, the three types of pigment particles may also be referred to as a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles.
For the white particles (11), they may be formed from an inorganic pigment, such as TiO2, ZrO2, ZnO, Al2O3, Sb2O3, BaSO4, PbSO4 or the like.
For the black particles (12), they may be formed from CI pigment black 26 or 28 or the like (e.g., manganese ferrite black spinel or copper chromite black spinel) or carbon black.
The third type of particles may be of a color such as red, green, blue, magenta, cyan or yellow. The pigments for this type of particles may include, but are not limited to, CI pigment PR 254, PR122, PR149, PG36, PG58, PG7, PB28, PB15:3, PY138, PY150, PY155 or PY20. Those are commonly used organic pigments described in color index handbook “New Pigment Application Technology” (CMC Publishing Co, Ltd, 1986) and “Printing Ink Technology” (CMC Publishing Co, Ltd, 1984). Specific examples include Clariant Hostaperm Red D3G 70-EDS, Hostaperm Pink E-EDS, PV fast red D3G, Hostaperm red D3G 70, Hostaperm Blue B2G-EDS, Hostaperm Yellow H4G-EDS, Hostaperm Green GNX, BASF Irgazine red L 3630, Cinquasia Red L 4100 HD, and Irgazin Red L 3660 HD; Sun Chemical phthalocyanine blue, phthalocyanine green, diarylide yellow or diarylide AAOT yellow.
In addition to the colors, the first, second and third types of particles may have other distinct optical characteristics, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range.
The solvent in which the three types of pigment particles are dispersed may be clear and colorless. It preferably has a low viscosity and a dielectric constant in the range of about 2 to about 30, preferably about 2 to about 15 for high particle mobility. Examples of suitable dielectric solvent include hydrocarbons such as isopar, decahydronaphthalene (DECALIN), 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, fatty oils, paraffin oil, silicon fluids, aromatic hydrocarbons such as toluene, xylene, phenylxylylethane, dodecylbenzene or alkylnaphthalene, halogenated solvents such as perfluorodecalin, perfluorotoluene, perfluoroxylene, dichlorobenzotrifluoride, 3,4,5-trichlorobenzotri fluoride, chloropentafluoro-benzene, dichlorononane or pentachlorobenzene, and perfluorinated solvents such as FC-43, FC-70 or FC-5060 from 3M Company, St. Paul Minn., low molecular weight halogen containing polymers such as poly(perfluoropropylene oxide) from TCI America, Portland, Oreg., poly(chlorotrifluoro-ethylene) such as Halocarbon Oils from Halocarbon Product Corp., River Edge, N.J., perfluoropolyalkylether such as Galden from Ausimont or Krytox Oils and Greases K-Fluid Series from DuPont, Del., polydimethylsiloxane based silicone oil from Dow-coming (DC-200).
A display layer utilizing the display fluid of the present invention has two surfaces, a first surface (16) on the viewing side and a second surface (17) on the opposite side of the first surface (16). The second surface therefore is on the non-viewing side. The term “viewing side” refers to the side at which images are viewed.
The display fluid is sandwiched between the two surfaces. On the side of the first surface (16), there is a common electrode (14) which is a transparent electrode layer (e.g., ITO), spreading over the entire top of the display layer. On the side of the second surface (17), there is an electrode layer (15) which comprises a plurality of pixel electrodes (15a).
The display fluid is filled in display cells. The display cells may be aligned with or not aligned with the pixel electrodes. The term “display cell” refers a micro-container which is filled with an electrophoretic fluid. Examples of “display cells” may include the cup-like microcells as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,818 and microcapsules as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,026. The micro-containers may be of any shapes or sizes, all of which are within the scope of the present application.
An area corresponding to a pixel electrode may be referred to as a pixel (or a sub-pixel). The driving of an area corresponding to a pixel electrode is effected by applying a voltage potential difference (or known as a driving voltage or an electric field) between the common electrode and the pixel electrode.
The pixel electrodes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,046,228, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. It is noted that while active matrix driving with a thin film transistor (TFT) backplane is mentioned for the layer of pixel electrodes, the scope of the present invention encompasses other types of electrode addressing as long as the electrodes serve the desired functions.
The space between two vertical dotted lines denotes a pixel (or a sub-pixel). For brevity, when “pixel” is referred to in a driving method, the term also encompasses “sub-pixel” s.
Two of the three types of pigment particles carry opposite charge polarities and the third type of pigment particles is slightly charged. The term “slightly charged” or “lower charge intensity” is intended to refer to the charge level of the particles being less than about 50%, preferably about 5% to about 30%, the charge intensity of the stronger charged particles. In one embodiment, the charge intensity may be measured in terms of zeta potential. In one embodiment, the zeta potential is determined by Colloidal Dynamics AcoustoSizer IIM with a CSPU-100 signal processing unit, ESA EN #Attn flow through cell (K:127). The instrument constants, such as density of the solvent used in the sample, dielectric constant of the solvent, speed of sound in the solvent, viscosity of the solvent, all of which at the testing temperature (25° C.) are entered before testing. Pigment samples are dispersed in the solvent (which is usually a hydrocarbon fluid having less than 12 carbon atoms), and diluted to between 5-10% by weight. The sample also contains a charge control agent (Solsperse 17000®, available from Lubrizol Corporation, a Berkshire Hathaway company; “Solsperse” is a Registered Trade Mark), with a weight ratio of 1:10 of the charge control agent to the particles. The mass of the diluted sample is determined and the sample is then loaded into the flow through cell for determination of the zeta potential.
For example, if the black particles are positively charged and the white particles are negatively charged, and then the colored pigment particles may be slightly charged. In other words, in this example, the charges carried by the black and the white particles are much more intense than the charge carried by the colored particles.
In addition, the colored particles which carries a slight charge has a charge polarity which is the same as the charge polarity carried by either one of the other two types of the stronger charged particles.
It is noted that among the three types of pigment particles, the one type of particles which is slightly charged preferably has a larger size.
In addition, in the context of the present application, a high driving voltage (VH1 or VH2) is defined as a driving voltage which is sufficient to drive a pixel from one extreme color state to another extreme color state. If the first and the second types of pigment particles are the higher charged particles, a high driving voltage then (VH1 or VH2) refers a driving voltage which is sufficient to drive a pixel from the color state of the first type of pigment particles to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, or vice versa. For example, a high driving voltage, VH1, refers to a driving voltage which is sufficient to drive a pixel from the color state of the first type of pigment particles to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, and VH2 refers to a driving voltage which is sufficient to drive a pixel from the color state of the second type of pigment particles to the color state of the first type of pigment particles. In this scenario as described, a low driving voltage (VL) is defined as a driving voltage which may be sufficient to drive a pixel to the color state of the third type of pigment particles (which are less charged and may be larger in size) from the color state of the first type of pigment particles. For example, a low driving voltage may be sufficient to drive to the color state of the colored particles while the black and white particles are not seen at the viewing side.
In general, the VL is less than 50%, or preferably less than 40%, of the amplitude of VH (e.g., VH1 or VH2).
The following is an example illustrating a driving scheme of how different color states may be displayed by an electrophoretic fluid as described above.
This example is demonstrated in
The colored particles (23) carry the same charge polarity as the black particles, but are slightly charged. As a result, the black particles move faster than the colored particles (23) under certain driving voltages.
In
In
It is noted that VH1 and VH2 have opposite polarities, and have the same amplitude or different amplitudes. In the example as shown in
In
The driving from the white color state in
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles (i.e., white), a second type of pigment particles (i.e., black) and a third type of pigment particles (i.e., colored), all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In order to drive a pixel to the color state of the third type of pigment particles, i.e., red (see
When the color of the third type of particles is seen at the viewing side, the other two types of the particles may be mixed at the non-viewing side (side opposite of the viewing side), resulting in an intermediate color state between the colors of the first and second types of particles. If the first and second types of particles are black and white and the third type of particles is red, then in
The driving method ideally would ensure both color brightness (i.e., preventing the black particles from being seen) and color purity (i.e., preventing the white particles from being seen) in the scenario of
One solution to this is the use of a shaking waveform prior to driving from the color state of the first type of pigment particles (i.e., white) to the color state of the third type of pigment particles (i.e., red). The shaking waveform consists of repeating a pair of opposite driving pulses for many cycles. For example, the shaking waveform may consist of a +15V pulse for 20 msec and a −15V pulse for 20 msec and such a pair of pulses is repeated for 50 times. The total time of such a shaking waveform would be 2000 msec. The notation, “msec”, stands for millisecond.
The shaking waveform may be applied to a pixel regardless of the optical state (black, white or red) prior to a driving voltage being applied. After the shaking waveform is applied, the optical state would not be a pure white, pure black or pure red. Instead, the color state would be from a mixture of the three types of pigment particles.
For the method as described above, a shaking waveform is applied prior to the pixel being driven to the color state of the first type of pigment particles (i.e., white). With this added shaking waveform, even though the white state is measurably the same as that without the shaking waveform, the color state of the third type of pigment particles (i.e., red) would be significantly better than that without the shaking waveform, on both color brightness and color purity. This is an indication of better separation of the white particles from the red particles as well as better separation of the black particles from the red particles.
Each of the driving pulses in the shaking waveform is applied for not exceeding half of the driving time required for driving from the full black state to the full white state, or vice versa. For example, if it takes 300 msec to drive a pixel from a full black state to a full white state, or vice versa, the shaking waveform may consist of positive and negative pulses, each applied for not more than 150 msec. In practice, it is preferred that the pulses are shorter.
It is noted that in all of the drawings throughout this application, the shaking waveform is abbreviated (i.e., the number of pulses is fewer than the actual number).
The driving method is shown in
The driving period “t2” is a time period sufficient to drive a pixel to the white state when VH2 is applied and the driving period “t3” is a time period sufficient to drive the pixel to the red state from the white state when VL is applied. A driving voltage is preferably applied for a period of t1 before the shaking waveform to ensure DC balance. The term “DC balance”, throughout this application, is intended to mean that the driving voltages applied to a pixel is substantially zero when integrated over a period of time (e.g., the period of an entire waveform).
The First Driving Method:
The first driving method of the present invention is illustrated in
In an initial step, a high negative driving voltage (VH2, e.g., −15V) is applied, which is followed by a positive driving voltage (+V′) to drive a pixel towards the red state. The amplitude of the +V′ is less than 50% of the amplitude of VH (e.g., VH1 or VH2).
In this driving waveform, a high negative driving voltage (VH2) is applied for a period of t4 to push the white particles towards the viewing side, which is then followed by applying a positive driving voltage of +V′ for a period of t5, which pulls the white particles down and pushes the red particles towards the viewing side.
In one embodiment, t4 may be in the range of 20-400 msec and t5 may be ≥200 msec.
The waveform of
The driving method of
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged.
In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the amplitude of the first driving voltage.
As stated, the driving waveform as shown in
In another embodiment, the step of driving to the white state for a period of t2 may be eliminated and in this case, a shaking waveform is applied before applying the waveform of
In one embodiment, the driving sequence of
The Second Driving Method:
The second driving method the present invention is illustrated in
In this alternative waveform, there is a wait time “t6” added. During the wait time, no driving voltage is applied. The entire waveform of
The waveform of
In the context of the present application, the term “low temperature” refers to a temperature below about 10° C.
The wait time presumably can dissipate the unwanted charge stored in the dielectric layers and cause the short pulse (“t4”) for driving a pixel towards the white state and the longer pulse (“t5”) for driving the pixel towards the red state to be more efficient. As a result, this alternative driving method will bring a better separation of the low charged pigment particles from the higher charged ones. The wait time (“t6”) can be in a range of 5-5,000 msec, depending on the resistance of the dielectric layers.
This driving method of
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged.
In one embodiment, the amplitude of the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the amplitude of the first driving voltage.
As stated, the driving waveform as shown in
In another embodiment, the step of driving to the white state for a period of t2 may be eliminated and in this case, a shaking waveform is applied before applying the waveform of
In another embodiment, the driving sequence of
It should be noted that the lengths of any of the driving periods referred to in this application may be temperature dependent.
The Third Driving Method:
The maximum a* in
Based on the concept of
In
Following the model of
In one example, when t4 is between 40˜140 msec, t5 is greater than or equal to 460 msec and N is greater than or equal to 7, the voltage-insensitive range (i.e., 3.7V to 6.5V) based on
The optimized parameters discussed above are also applicable to any of the driving methods of the present invention.
The third driving method therefore may be summarized as follows:
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrode and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In such a method, when a driving voltage within such a range is applied, the optical quality of a color state achieved is at least 90% of the maximum acceptable “a” value.
It is also noted that the data shown in
The Fourth Driving Method:
The fourth driving method of the present invention is illustrated in
In an initial step, a high negative driving voltage (VH2, e.g., −15V) is applied to a pixel for a period of t7, which is followed by a wait time of t8. After the wait time, a positive driving voltage (V′, e.g., less than 50% of VH1 or VH2) is applied to the pixel for a period of t9, which is followed by a second wait time of t10. The waveform of
This driving method not only is particularly effective at a low temperature, it can also provide a display device better tolerance of structural variations caused during manufacture of the display device. Therefore its usefulness is not limited to low temperature driving.
In the waveform of
In the shaking waveform, the positive/negative pulse pair is preferably repeated 50-1500 times and each pulse is preferably applied for 10 msec.
In one embodiment, the step of driving to the white state for a period of t2 may be eliminated and in this case, a shaking waveform is applied before applying the waveform of
The fourth driving method of
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged.
In one embodiment, steps (i)-(iv) are repeated at least 3 times.
In one embodiment, the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the driving voltage sufficient to drive a pixel from the color state of the first type of pigment particles to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, or vice versa.
In another embodiment, the driving sequence of
The Fifth Driving Method:
As shown in
The fifth driving method of the present invention is illustrated in
In
The pulse “t14” is usually at least twice the length of the pulse “t13”.
The short pulse “t13” of VH2 will push the black and red particles towards the pixel electrode and the longer pulse “t14” of VH1 will push them to the common electrode side (i.e., the viewing side). Since the speed of the two types of pigment particles are not the same under the same driving voltages, this asymmetrical driving sequence will benefit the black particles more than the red particles. As a result, the black particles can be better separated from the red particles.
The wait time “t15” is optional, depending on the dielectric layers in the display device. It is common that at a lower temperature, the resistance of the dielectric layers is more pronounced and, in this case, a wait time may be needed to release the charge trapped in the dielectric layers.
The fifth driving method of
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged.
The method as described in
In one embodiment, the driving sequence of
The Sixth Driving Method:
The sixth driving method of the present invention is illustrated in
This driving method is particularly suitable for low temperature driving, although it is not limited to low temperature driving.
In
Such a sequence is applied for at least once, preferably at least 3 times (i.e., N is ≥3 in
It is noted that the t19 must be longer than t18. For example, t18 may be in the range of 20-200 msec and t19 may be less than 1000 msec. The wait time t20 needs to be at least 50 msec.
The sixth driving method as shown in
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged.
In one embodiment as shown in
In another embodiment as shown in
In the shaking waveform, the positive/negative pulse pair is preferably repeated 50-1500 times and each pulse is preferably applied for 10 msec.
In one embodiment, the driving sequence of
The Seventh Driving Method:
The seventh driving method of the present invention drives a pixel towards an intermediate color state (e.g., grey).
This driving method is shown in
The driving period t22 is a time period sufficient to drive a pixel to the black state when VH1 is applied, and t23 is a time period sufficient to drive the pixel to the grey state from the black state when VL is applied. Prior to the shaking waveform, a pulse of VH1 is preferably applied for a period of t21 to ensure DC balance.
The waveform of
The time period, t24 is less than about 100 msec and t25 is usually greater than 100 msec, both at ambient temperature.
The seventh driving method as shown in
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
As stated above, the second driving voltage is about 50% of the first driving voltage, in this method.
It is noted that in
It is possible to modulate the grey state to be brighter or darker by changing the low negative voltage (VL). In other words, the waveform sequence and shape may remain the same; but the amplitude of VL varies (e.g. −4V, −5V, −6V or −7V) to cause different grey levels to be displayed. This feature could potentially reduce the required space for the look-up tables in the driving circuit, consequently lowering the cost. The driving method as illustrated can produce a high quality of an intermediate state (of the first type of pigment particles and the second type of pigment particles) with very little color interference from the third type of pigment particles.
In one embodiment, the driving sequence of
The Eighth Driving Method:
The eighth driving method of the present invention is illustrated in
In an initial step, a high negative driving voltage (VH2, e.g., −15V) is applied for a period of t26, which is followed by a wait time of t27. After the wait time, a positive 25 driving voltage (V′, e.g., less than 50% of VH1 or VH2) is applied for a period of t28, which is followed by a second wait time of t29. The waveform of
This driving method is particularly effective at a low temperature, and it may also shorten the overall driving time to the red state.
It is noted that the time period t26 is rather short, usually in the range of about 50% of the time required to drive from a full black state to a full white state and therefore it is not sufficient to drive a pixel to a full white color state. The time period t27 may be less than 100 msec; the time period t28 may range of 100-200 msec; and the time period t29 may be less than 1000 msec.
It is also noted that the waveform of
In the shaking waveform, the positive/negative pulse pair is preferably repeated 50-1500 times and each pulse is preferably applied for 10 msec.
The eighth driving method of
A driving method for an electrophoretic display comprising a first surface on the viewing side, a second surface on the non-viewing side and an electrophoretic fluid which fluid is sandwiched between a common electrode and a layer of pixel electrodes and comprises a first type of pigment particles, a second type of pigment particles and a third type of pigment particles, all of which are dispersed in a solvent or solvent mixture, wherein
In one embodiment, the first type of pigment particles is negatively charged and the second type of pigment particles is positively charged.
In one embodiment, steps (i)-(iv) are repeated at least 3 times.
In one embodiment, the second driving voltage is less than 50% of the driving voltage sufficient to drive a pixel from the color state of the first type of pigment particles to the color state of the second type of pigment particles, or vice versa.
In one embodiment, the driving sequence of
While the present invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, materials, compositions, processes, process step or steps, to the objective and scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/507,737, filed Oct. 6, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 61/887,821, filed Oct. 7, 2013; 61/925,055, filed Jan. 8, 2014; 61/942,407, filed Feb. 20, 2014; 61/979,464, filed Apr. 14, 2014; and 62/004,713, filed May 29, 2014. The contents of all patents, applications, and publications identified herein are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4143947 | Aftergut et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4259694 | Liao | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4443108 | Webster | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4568975 | Harshbarger | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4575124 | Morrison | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4947159 | Di Santo et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5266937 | DiSanto et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5298993 | Edgar et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5754584 | Durrant et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5831697 | Evanicky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5923315 | Ueda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926617 | Ohara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930026 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6005890 | Clow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6045756 | Carr et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6069971 | Kanno et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6075506 | Bonnett et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6111248 | Melendez et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6154309 | Otani et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6219014 | Havel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6445489 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6473072 | Comiskey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6504524 | Gates et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6512354 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6531997 | Gates et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532008 | Guralnick | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6639580 | Kishi et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6650462 | Katase | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6657612 | Machida et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6671081 | Kawai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6674561 | Ohnishi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6686953 | Holmes | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6753844 | Machida et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6753999 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760059 | Ham | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6796698 | Sommers et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6825970 | Goenaga et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6900851 | Morrison et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6903716 | Kawabe et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6914713 | Chung et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6927755 | Chang | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6930818 | Liang et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6970155 | Cabrera | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6982178 | LeCain et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6987503 | Inoue | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6995550 | Jacobson et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006130 | Harshbarger, Jr. et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7012600 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7023420 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034783 | Gates et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7046228 | Liang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7057600 | Goden | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061166 | Kuniyasu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7061662 | Chung et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7116466 | Whitesides et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119772 | Amundson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126577 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7177066 | Chung et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184196 | Ukigaya | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7193625 | Danner et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7202847 | Gates | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7242514 | Chung et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7259744 | Arango et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7277074 | Shih | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7283119 | Kishi | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7298543 | Tam et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7304787 | Whitesides et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7307779 | Cernasov | Dec 2007 | B1 |
| 7312794 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7327511 | Whitesides et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7349146 | Douglass et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349147 | Chopra et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7355784 | Kim | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7397289 | Kojima | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7408699 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7443466 | Dedene et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7446749 | Lee et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7453445 | Amundson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7492339 | Amundson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7495651 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7504050 | Weng et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7528822 | Amundson et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7545358 | Gates et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7583251 | Arango et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7602374 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7607106 | Ernst et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7609435 | Moriyama et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7612760 | Kawai | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7639849 | Kimpe et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7679599 | Kawai | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7679813 | Liang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7683606 | Kang et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7688297 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7701423 | Suwabe et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7701436 | Miyasaka | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7705823 | Nihei et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7710376 | Edo et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7719755 | Kanbe | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729039 | LeCain et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7733311 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7733335 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7773069 | Miyasaka et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7786974 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7787169 | Abramson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7791717 | Cao et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7792398 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7800580 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7804483 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7816440 | Matsui | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7839381 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7848009 | Machida et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859742 | Chiu et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
| 7868874 | Reynolds | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7911444 | Yee | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7952557 | Amundson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7952558 | Yang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7956841 | Albert et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7982479 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7995029 | Johnson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7999787 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009348 | Zehner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8018450 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8035611 | Sakamoto | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8044927 | Inoue | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8054253 | Yoo | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8068090 | Machida et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8077141 | Duthaler et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8081155 | Kajino | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8102363 | Hirayama | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8115729 | Danner et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125501 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8139050 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8174490 | Whitesides et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8179387 | Shin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8228289 | Nagasaki | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8237733 | Rhodes | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8243013 | Sprague et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
| 8274472 | Wang et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8289250 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8300006 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8305341 | Arango et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8310439 | Lee et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8314784 | Ohkami et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8319766 | Gormish et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8334836 | Kanamori et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8373649 | Low et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8384658 | Albert et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8405600 | Reis et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8432387 | Lee | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8456414 | Lin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8462102 | Wong et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8514168 | Chung et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8537105 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8558783 | Wilcox et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8558785 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8558786 | Lin | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8558855 | Sprague et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8570639 | Masuzawa et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8576163 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8576164 | Sprague et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8576259 | Lin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8593396 | Amundson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8599128 | Markvoort et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8605032 | Liu et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8643595 | Chung et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8665206 | Lin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8681191 | Yang et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8704753 | Miyazaki et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8730153 | Sprague et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8791896 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8810525 | Sprague | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8928562 | Gates et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8928641 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8963903 | Sakamoto et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8976444 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9013394 | Lin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9013516 | Sakamoto et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9013783 | Sprague | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9019197 | Lin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9019198 | Lin et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9019318 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9082352 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9171508 | Sprague et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9218773 | Sun et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9224338 | Chan et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9224342 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9224344 | Chung et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9230492 | Harrington et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9251736 | Lin et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9262973 | Wu et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9269311 | Amundson | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9299294 | Lin et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9373289 | Sprague et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9390066 | Smith et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9390661 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9412314 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9460666 | Sprague et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9495918 | Harrington et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9501981 | Lin et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9513527 | Chan et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9513743 | Sjodin et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9514667 | Lin | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9542895 | Gates et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9557623 | Wang et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9564088 | Wilcox et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9612502 | Danner et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9620048 | Sim et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9620067 | Harrington et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9632386 | Takanashi et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9671668 | Chan et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9672766 | Sjodin | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9691333 | Cheng et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9721495 | Harrington et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9792861 | Chang et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9792862 | Hung et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9812073 | Lin et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9966018 | Gates et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10036931 | Chan et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10062337 | Lin et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10214647 | Yezek et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10229641 | Yang et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10319313 | Harris et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10339876 | Lin | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 20030102858 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030193565 | Wen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040074120 | Fryer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246562 | Chung et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050253777 | Zehner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060023126 | Johnson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060119567 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060132426 | Johnson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060164405 | Zhou | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060232547 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291125 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070035510 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052668 | Zhou | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057907 | Ishii et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080926 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070080928 | Ishii et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091117 | Zhou et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091418 | Danner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103427 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070132687 | Johnson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070176889 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070176912 | Beames et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070212022 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070262949 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297038 | Chopra | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080024429 | Zehner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080024482 | Gates et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080136774 | Harris et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080150886 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158142 | Zhou et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080212165 | Jagt et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080266243 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080273022 | Komatsu | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303780 | Sprague et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090167754 | Hatta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090174651 | Jacobson et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090309870 | Takei | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322721 | Zehner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100149169 | Miyasaka | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100194733 | Lin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100194789 | Lin et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100220121 | Zehner et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238203 | Stroemer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100265561 | Gates et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20110063314 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110175875 | Lin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110193840 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110193841 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110199671 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110221740 | Yang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120001957 | Liu et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120098740 | Chiu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120200610 | Sakamoto | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120256893 | Sakamoto | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20130063333 | Arango et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130194250 | Amundson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130249782 | Wu et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140009817 | Wilcox et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140204012 | Wu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140240210 | Wu et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140253425 | Zalesky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140293398 | Wang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150097877 | Lin | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150262255 | Khajehnouri et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150262551 | Zehner et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160140910 | Amundson | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160180777 | Lin et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20170263176 | Lin | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101009083 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 101727224 | Jun 2010 | CN |
| 2002014654 | Jan 2002 | JP |
| 2008209893 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2009116041 | May 2009 | JP |
| 2009145751 | Jul 2009 | JP |
| 2009192786 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 2010181477 | Aug 2010 | JP |
| 2011059525 | Mar 2011 | JP |
| 2011158783 | Aug 2011 | JP |
| 20070082680 | Aug 2007 | KR |
| 20080055331 | Jun 2008 | KR |
| 2008001288 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Adam J. Pyonin, Patent Board Decision for U.S. Appl. No. 14/507,737, 2018, United States Patent and Trademark Office, (Year: 2018). |
| Sprague, R.A., “Active Matrix Displays for e-readers Using Microcup Electrophoretic.”, Presentation conducted at SID 2011, 49 Int'l Symposium, Seminar and Exhibition, Los Angeles Convention Center, USA (May 18, 2011) . May 18, 2011. |
| Kao, W.C., “Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Display.”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 1-5 (Feb. 2009). Feb. 1, 2009. |
| Kao, W.C. et al., “Configurable Timing Controller Design for Active Matrix Electrophoretic Display with 16 Gray Levels.”, ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 10.2-2, (Jan. 2009). Jan. 14, 2009. |
| Kao, W.C. et al., “Integrating Flexible Electrophoretic Display And One-Time Password Generator in Smart Cards.”, ICCE Digest of Technical Papers, p. 4-3, (Jan. 2008). Jan. 13, 2008. |
| Korean Intellectual Property Office; PCT/US2014/059361; International Search Report & Written Opinion; dated Jan. 8, 2015, dated Jan. 8, 2015. |
| European Patent Office; EP Appl. No. 14852627.0; The Partial Supplementary European Search Report; dated Jun. 8, 2017 dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
| European Patent Office; EP Appl. No. 14852627.0; Extended European Search Report; dated Oct. 12, 2017, dated Oct. 12, 2017. |
| Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2018/027897, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Sep. 17, 2018, dated Sep. 17, 2018. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190272792 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61887821 | Oct 2013 | US | |
| 61925055 | Jan 2014 | US | |
| 61942407 | Feb 2014 | US | |
| 61979464 | Apr 2014 | US | |
| 62004713 | May 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14507737 | Oct 2014 | US |
| Child | 16415123 | US |
