This invention relates to the field of induction cleaning, more particularly to chemically cleaning the induction system of the internal combustion engine. This method uses chemicals, typically different, delivered in stages in order to remove buildup of carbon accumulation from the induction system or intake track which can include the throttle body, throttle plate, intake plenum, intake manifold, intake charge valve, intake runners, intake opening or port, and intake valve. It has been found that if the induction cleaning chemicals are delivered in timed intervals (sometimes referred to as layers or layering) the removal of such induction carbon can be accomplished. A preferred embodiment uses electronically controlled solenoids to deliver at least two different chemistries in alternating layers to the engine's induction system.
Even though the carbon compounds that accumulate in the engine are unwanted, carbon is very much a part of the internal combustion engine. This is due to the fact that lubricants and fuels used in the engine are carbon based compounds. The lubricant and fuel carbon bonds are formed with hydrogen and produce hydrocarbon chains. These hydrocarbon chains are refined from crude oil and contain various molecular weights. When these hydrocarbon chains are formed to produce lubricating oil they contain heavier, thicker petroleum based stock that have between 18 and 34 carbon atoms per molecule. Lubricating oil creates a separating film between the engine's moving parts that is used to minimize direct contact between the moving parts which decreases heat caused by friction and reduces wear, thus protecting the engine. When these hydrocarbon chains are made for fuel such as gasoline, they contain lighter petroleum based stock that have between 4 and 12 carbon atoms per molecule. Overall, a typical gasoline is predominantly a mixture of paraffins (alkanes), cycloalkanes (naphthenes), and olefins (alkenes). Fuel is blended to produce a rapid high energy release combustion event that propagates through the air in the combustion chamber at subsonic speeds and is driven by the transfer of heat. As the internal combustion engine is operated the fuel's energy is released in the combustion chamber. This occurs by a chemical change in the hydrocarbon chains. The heat from the ignition spark (gasoline) or from the compression (diesel) breaks the hydrocarbon chains so the bonds between the carbon and hydrogen are separated. This allows the carbon to bond with dioxygen (O2), and the hydrogen to bond with oxygen (O); thus changing the hydrocarbon chains to carbon dioxide (CO2), and water (H2O). However, if there is a lack of oxygen during the burning of the fuel then pyrolysis occurs. Pyrolysis is a type of thermal decomposition that occurs in organic materials exposed to high temperatures. Pyrolysis of organic substances such as fuel produces gas and liquid products that leave a solid, carbon rich residue. Heavy pyrolysis leaves mostly carbon as a residue and is referred to as carbonization.
As this carbon buildup creates tailpipe emission problems, drivability problems, and poor fuel economy, it is desirable to remove this buildup from the internal combustion engine. This carbon can be removed by engine disassembly and manual cleaning, however this is very time consuming and expensive. An easier, less expensive alternative is to remove this carbon buildup using chemicals to clean the engine. Over the years there have been numerous attempts involving the use of cleaning apparatus and chemicals to solve the problem of carbon buildup removal.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,671,230 Turnipseed discloses a device that holds or contains a mixture of carbon cleaning solution and gasoline. The vehicle's fuel supply system is disabled from the engine and the invention is connected to the fuel delivery for the engine. The invention then supplies the engine with the pressurized cleaning solution as the engine is run. This cleaning solution is then delivered through the engine injectors. The problem with this method is that the cleaning solution is only applied to the intake valve and the immediate intake port area around the intake valve. The rest of the induction system remains uncleaned. Additionally, if the engine is that of a direct injection design, no intake cleaning will take place at all.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,989,561 Hein discloses a device that connects to the throttle body of the engine. The device or metering block has an adjustment to increase or decrease the air flow into the engine. This air flow adjustment will set the air rate into the engine, thus bypassing the throttle plate control. The metering block also holds an electronic automotive style fuel injector that will deliver the cleaning chemical. The vehicle fuel system is disabled by unplugging the fuel injectors or fuel pump. If the vehicle is equipped with a Mass Air Flow (MAF) sensor an additional tube must be connected from the metering block to the MAF sensor. The throttle is then depressed and the engine is started and run on the cleaner solution that is pressurized and delivered to the engine. Once the cleaning solvent has been delivered and all of the chemical has been used, a second chemical is then added and the engine is run until all of this chemical has been used.
The problems with this method are threefold. The first problem is the complication and time to install the invention. The second problem is the engine Revolutions Per Minute (RPM) cannot be varied above the adjustment point of the metering block adjustment. The ability to change the RPM, which in turn changes the energy of the air flowing into the engine, is important. Since the energy of the air flow is carrying the chemical it will be necessary to raise the RPM and have a rapid throttle opening or snap throttle of the engine. This increased air flow will help prevent the chemical from puddling within the intake manifold as well as carry additional chemical to the carbon sites. The third problem occurs if the engine is equipped with Drive-by-wire. Drive-by-wire systems were first installed on vehicles as early as 1989 and by 2003 is standard equipment for most U.S. based vehicles. This system is a safety critical system where the Engine Control Unit (ECU) controls and monitors the throttle plate position. If the throttle plate position does not match the air flow rate commanded into the engine by the ECU the system is put into a default position. There are many different defaults that can be command by the ECU in order to maintain the air rate in to the engine. One such default could cause the engine to shut down by cutting the fuel, spark and air to the engine. Another default is accomplished whereby the throttle plate position is no longer controlled by the ECU but will allow the throttle plate position to be slightly opened by the default spring which will only allow the engine to run at about 1800 RPM. Additionally the fuel and spark can be turned on and off in order to control the air rate and RPM of the engine, which will cause severe damage to the catalytic converter. In yet another default the Drive-by-wire system will force the throttle shut when the expected air rate cannot be obtained.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,557,517 B2 Augustus discloses a device that applies cleaning chemical into the engine through the spark plug hole. A single chemical cleaner is installed in the invention's multiple reservoirs in the main cylindrical body. The spark plugs are removed from the engine and an adapter is installed into each of the spark plug holes that are connected with hoses to the main cylindrical body. The main cylindrical body also contains a metering valve system that allows the chemical to be delivered directly into the cylinder without the engine hydrolocking or liquid locking. The cleaning chemical is put into the cylinder in order to clean the piston compression rings. In order to clean the piston rings the starter motor is bumped. Bumping means the starter is engaged for a very short time to move the piston up or down several inches. This piston movement when repeated multiple times with chemical cleaner applied to the piston ring will clean the carbon from the piston and piston ring.
The problem with this method is twofold. The first problem is the amount of time and knowledge required to install such a complicated device. The second problem is the only carbon removal that is accomplished is in the combustion chamber. The induction system or intake tract which can include; the throttle body, throttle plate, intake plenum, intake manifold, intake charge valve, intake runners, intake port, and intake valve are not cleaned at all by the invention.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,530,392 B2 Blatter discloses a device that applies cleaning chemical into the engine through the vacuum port. The base of the device holds a can of chemical cleaner and has a means to adjust the flow rate of the cleaner that can be observed through a sight glass. The base is connected to the nozzle with a tube. The nozzle has a hole drilled at a 90 degree angle that will bleed air from the atmosphere into the discharge. The nozzle is connected to the engine vacuum hose on the engine's intake system. The engine is then started and run where the low pressure created by the running engine pulls the cleaner into the intake tract. The cleaner can be adjusted by turning the adjustment screw while watching the flow through the sight glass. The entire can of chemical is delivered in one continuous application to try to clean the engine. As the cleaner is pulled through the discharge nozzle air from the atmosphere moves through the air bleed, located in the discharge nozzle, where it is mixed with the chemical cleaner. This air bleed breaks up the liquid cleaner into droplets as it is delivered into the intake tract.
The problem with this design and its method of use is the droplet size is not consistent as is illustrated in Applicant's
As can be seen the prior art has many limitations. These limitations pose significant problems when cleaning the induction system. What is needed is the means to quickly and easily remove the carbon from the internal combustion engine. The present invention accomplishes this.
The above described systems all have problems removing the carbon from the internal combustion engine's induction system in real world situations. For any chemical to be affective it must first be delivered to the carbon sites. To accomplish this air flowing into the engine is used. The energy of the moving air column will carry the chemical into the engine. The question is how effectively is the chemical being carried to the carbon sites?
In modern engine designs the intake tract often has a scroll style intake (e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,533,644, 4,741,294 A). The air entering through the throttle body may be at a lower point than the intake valve. Additionally the intake tract may scroll upward and then back down to the intake valve port area. The intake may also have a charge valve which isolates two different intake runner lengths, these different length runners help with cylinder charge or fill. When induction cleaning chemical droplets are in the air column and are moving around these intake bends the droplets tend to fall out of the air column to the intake system's floor. When this occurs the intake tract floor can be cleaned, however the intake tract top and sides are left with carbon deposits. With this intake tract design, it is necessary to have small droplets or a true aerosol delivered to the intake tract. Further, this aerosol or small droplets needs to be delivered directly into the moving air column after the throttle plate. If the aerosol hits an obstruction such as the throttle plate or throttle body, or if the delivery system makes varying droplet sizes (e.g., Blatter), then the droplets will congeal into larger heavier droplets. These heavier droplets are unable to be supported by the energy of the moving air column and tend to fall out to the induction system's floor.
Furthermore, the carbon compounds within the internal combustion engine can vary in chemical composition and thickness making it very difficult to remove. The carbon from a running engine can be produced from the fuel or from the motor oil. Since both the fuel and motor oil are hydrocarbon based they can produce carbon compounds that can accumulate. Additionally if the engine is equipped with an Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system the burned hydrocarbons contained in exhaust gases can also accumulate in the induction system. The different types of carbon compounds and the amount of carbon accumulation within an engine will vary depending on several different variables such as the type of hydrocarbons the fuel is made of, the detergents added to the fuel base, the type of hydrocarbons the motor oil is made of, the operating temperature of the engine, the pressure the carbon is produced under, the load on the engine, the engine drive time, the engine drive cycle, and the engine design. Each of these variables will affect the type of carbon that will be produced and the carbon accumulation that will accrue within the engine.
It is important to understand that the carbon produced within an engine is not all the same. The carbon in the combustion chamber is produced under high heat and high pressure, creating a carbon that is denser and has low porosity. Additionally the carbon thickness is usually low. These combustion chamber deposits will cause high tailpipe emissions and pre-ignition problems which can cause serious engine damage. The carbon that is produced within the induction system is created under very different conditions than the combustion chamber deposits.
The carbon in the intake is produced under low heat and low pressure, creating a carbon that has high porosity. Additionally the carbon thickness can be quite high. The intake carbon accumulation can be produced in different areas such as the throttle body, intake plenum, intake runner, intake port, and the intake valve. These carbon deposits can disrupt the air flow into the cylinder causing performance and drivability issues. The more uneven the carbon accumulations are, the greater the air disruptions will be. These uneven intake carbon accumulations decrease power, torque, and fuel economy. With heavy intake carbon accumulations misfire conditions can also occur. This can be caused by major air disruptions or carbon creating valve sealing issues. Additionally the intake carbon deposits can create cold drivability issues; the intake carbon being very porous allows the fuel to be absorbed into the carbon creating a cold lean run condition.
The carbon that has accumulated within the induction system of the engine is very difficult to remove. Chemically these carbon deposits are very close to that of asphalt or bitumen. In order to break these carbon deposits down and remove them from the induction system it will require not only the use of chemicals capable of removing such carbon buildup, but the use of the layering technique of the present invention. This chemical layering technique can remove different carbon compound types and carbon thicknesses from the internal combustion engine.
What is needed is a method and apparatus that can quickly and accurately clean the induction system of the internal combustion engine regardless of the engine design or the amount of carbon buildup within the engine. The present invention accomplishes these goals.
The present invention relates to both apparatus and methods of applying chemicals to the induction system in stages in order for the removal of carbon buildup in the internal combustion engine. The method of removing carbon build up from the internal combustion engine includes, typically, the use of first and second different chemical compositions of matter (a “first chemistry” and “second chemistry”) each capable of removing at least some carbon in at least a portion of the engine, and apparatus for delivering the first and second chemistries to the induction system in a series of stages. The method includes:
A preferred apparatus includes a base assembly, microprocessor, control buttons, multiple reservoirs, air pressure regulator, pressure gauge, electronic controlled solenoids, delivery hoses, and an induction cleaner nozzle. The reservoirs are filled with two different chemical formulations or compositions of matter; a first chemistry and a second chemistry. An air pressure hose is connected to a pressure regulator that is connected to the base assembly to pressurize the chemistries contained in the reservoirs. These reservoirs are connected with delivery hoses to two electric solenoids. These two solenoids, or electric valves, are connected to a single induction cleaner nozzle. The induction cleaner nozzle is connected to an intake opening or port (e.g., vacuum port) on the engine intake tract. This nozzle is slipped through the port into the inside of the intake tract where it will sequentially spray small droplets (e.g., an aerosol) of each of the two chemistries. The solenoids are turned on and off in order to deliver the pressurized cleaning chemistries through the induction cleaner nozzle to the engine's induction system.
In the case of engines without throttle plates, such as but not limited to diesel engines, there is a problem with the induction chemistries puddling in the intake manifold, which is particularly significant when scroll style intake manifolds are used. To address this issue a throttle plate attachment has been developed for use with the induction cleaner apparatus of the present invention. With this attachment the cleaning methodology remains essentially the same as for engines which include throttle plates.
In such a preferred embodiment the solenoids are controlled by a microprocessor that has been programmed to deliver the chemistries to the induction system in 4 stages:
Stage 1: A first chemistry is applied for 30 seconds and is then shut off.
Stage 2: A period of 30 seconds where no chemistry is applied.
Stage 3: A second chemistry is applied for 30 seconds and is then shut off.
Stage 4: A period of 30 seconds where no chemistry is applied.
The foregoing timed interval sequences, or stages, are repeated for a period of, for instance, 25 minutes. The time period for each stage may be referred to as a run time. These run times can be varied depending on, for instance, the chemistries used. For example with different chemistries, the first stage could have a first run time of 5 seconds of chemistry being applied, followed by a 15 second pause time, and the second stage could have a second run time of 15 seconds of chemistry being applied, followed by a 30 second pause time. These stages would then be cycled, for instance, for 30 minutes.
In some circumstances the amount of chemistry being applied while the solenoid is on maybe increased by over 100% above the conventional amount of such chemistry that, based on the manufacturer's recommendation, would normally be applied. A conventional amount of chemistry delivery is about 16 oz. in 20 minutes at a constant delivery rate, which equates to 0.8 oz. of chemical per minute. In a preferred embodiment the Dual Solenoid Induction Cleaner delivers 32 oz. of such chemistry in 12½ minutes, which equates to 2.56 oz. of chemical per minute. With this additional chemistry being delivered to the engine it becomes necessary to periodically stop the delivery. Without the above referenced 30 second pause the engine's exhaust components such as but not limited to the catalytic converter, and/or the turbo charger, would overheat and become damaged. However, with this pause the exhaust components such as the catalytic converter, and/or the turbo charger, temperature can be maintained, thus protecting them from damage.
Additionally during the pause the chemistry has time to soak the carbon deposits which helps with its removal. This pause stage could be carried out between just the first and second stage or just between the second and first stage. However, testing with the pause stage, and testing without the pause stage, clearly indicated that the chemistries worked better with a pause between each of the chemistry stages. Additionally through testing it has been determined that even if only one chemistry is used the pause stage allows the induction system to be cleaned far better than without the pause stage. This is due to the increased amount of time that the chemical is in contact with the carbon without saturating the carbon deposit. In some cases using some chemistries the carbon deposit will become gummy when saturated making the carbon deposit difficult to remove. With the traditional method of chemistry delivery the chemistry is continuously delivered into the induction system therefore keeping the carbon deposit saturated. However, with the chemistry delivery being paused the carbon does not become saturated. Thus, the chemistry can work far better at removing the carbon deposits from the induction system. Further, with the increased volume of chemistry being applied to the induction system there is actually enough to wash out or remove the carbon deposits. One of the real advantages of using two different chemistries is that the first chemistry will break down a small amount of the carbon surface and the second chemistry will remove or wash this small amount of carbon out of the engine. Thus, in the description of the apparatus in the preferred embodiment, the first chemistry may be referred to as cleaner and the second chemistry may be referred to as wash. By removing small amounts at a time the carbon can actually be removed on a repeatable base from the internal combustion engine. It should be appreciated that with different chemistries one may be formulated (or act more effectively) to remove, flush, or wash out the immediately preceding chemistry and carbon which has been previously loosened. It should also be appreciated that, after the application of the first chemistry for the first time, each following application of chemistry (whether the same chemistry or different chemistry) will have some washing effect.
If a lower weight of chemistry were delivered, such as the conventional amount normally used, the pause where no chemical is delivered between alternating applications of chemistry would not have to be carried out (however as described above the pause helps with the carbon deposit breakdown and removal). Since the chemical weight is much less the catalytic converter and/or the turbocharger temperature will not increase to a point of damage. However, with or without the pause, the alternating layering of the different chemistries will provide superior carbon removal.
It is important to understand that with conventional methods of chemistry delivery the engine is running while chemistry is delivered continuously (in bulk) to the engine. One example of this is if two different chemicals were going to be used and each chemical was 16 ounces, the entire 16 oz of the first chemical would be continuously delivered and then the entire 16 oz of second chemical would be continuously delivered. This conventional method of bulk delivery is not that of the repeated alternate stages (i.e., cycling) of the present invention and, thus, will exhibit problems with carbon removal.
It has been found that a chemical presoak will help remove the carbon buildup within the induction system. As with all induction cleaning chemicals, time and additional chemistry helps in order to remove carbon deposit. We have determined through testing that, when using some induction cleaning chemistry, if the induction cleaning chemistry is applied during an engine crank and then left to soak over time, the chemistry will start to break down the carbon deposits. The cranking time preferred is 20 seconds. This crank time is set due to the heat generated within the starter motor during long crank times. During engine cranking the engine slowly and evenly draws air into each cylinder. When the chemical is discharged during this crank period an even distribution of the chemistry can be applied within the engine. This cranking treatment will apply chemistry to the engine which includes, the intake tract (including the intake valve), combustion chamber, and exhaust valve. Once this chemical is applied and allowed to soak the chemistry starts to change the carbon deposits. While this soak time will vary depending on the specific chemistry used, testing has determined that a minimum of 15 minutes is necessary to start carbon deposit breakdown with the presently available commercial carbon cleaning chemistries. After the soak period is completed it becomes much easier to remove the carbon deposit during the engine run cleaning procedure.
If a chemical presoak is desired, wire 44 (shown in
The engine is now started and the service person will push the start clean button 18. The enabling criterion for the start clean sequence is the air pressure level is good and a signal is received from engine run sensor 45, indicating the engine is running. If the enabling criteria is not present not armed lamp 28 is illuminated and audio alert (not shown) is beeped. If enabling criteria is good the system will start to deliver induction cleaner for, for instance, 30 seconds. When the cleaner solenoid 36 (shown in
It is important to understand that these time stage sequences can be altered for different chemistries. Different chemistries may need different time sequences in order to allow them to work to their maximum capability. Also the amount of chemical weight delivered to the engine can be changed for different chemistries in order to allow them to work to their maximum capability. Additionally more than two chemistries could also be used. During the testing of the Dual Solenoid Cleaner up to four different chemistries have been used. This required four different reservoirs in order to deliver the four different chemistries to the engine. Through testing it was determined that the use of what is sometimes referred to as first chemical cleaner and a second chemical wash provided the best results. These chemistries, called first chemical cleaner and second chemical wash, are just different chemistries that interact with one another quite well. These chemistries are chosen by the results of the interaction between the carbon deposit and the chemistries themselves. Regardless of how much is delivered, the interaction of the chemistry with the carbon deposit is important. If a large amount of a particular chemistry was used that did not work no carbon would be removed. Thus, the formulation of the chemistries used cannot be ignored.
The chemical nature of carbonaceous engine deposits varies somewhat depending on their location in the engine, which is largely a factor of deposition history, (e.g., temperature, combustion, amount of re-exposure to liquid). Although the deposits typically consist primarily of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon species, there are also aliphatic species that may be alkanes or alkenes and have varying degrees of oxygenation. The nature of the hydrocarbon mixture will depend, again, on the deposit location and deposition history. It is known that different solvent types, concentrations and combinations attack the various hydrocarbon types to varying degrees and that, furthermore, the efficacy of their effect is also a function of temperature, pressure, and exposure time. The latter is of particular importance when considering the Dual Solenoid Induction Cleaner run profile (discussed below) as well as knowledge of the specific chemical action performed on the various deposits by the various chemistries used.
In general, there are three types of carbon deposit cleaning solvents. (1) Non-Specific Solvents that remove the relatively small amount of waxy and resinous parts of the deposits based solely on solubility parameter interaction. These types of deposit materials typically occur in cooler areas of the engine, such as at the injector tip, and their removal can create larger pore volume in the remainder of the deposit that may be swelled by other, more aggressive solvents. Examples of non-specific solvents include acetone, alcohols, and ethers. (2) Specific Solvents that cause physical dissolution via electron density mediated disruption of non-covalent bonds. These solvents induce deposit swelling and will remove some fraction (approximately 20-40%) of the deposit that is chemically indistinguishable from the remainder of the deposit. Specific Solvents are typically molecules that contain a nitrogen atom and an oxygen atom with an unshared electron lone pair. Pyridine is an example of a Specific Solvent. (3) Reactive Solvents that cause deposit degradation by covalent bond cleavage. The chemical structure of both the solvent and the deposit may be altered as a result of the interaction. Reactive Solvents for carbon removal are generally either alkaline hydrolysis compounds/mixtures or dipolar aprotic ‘super solvents’. An example of a super solvent is methyl pyrrolidones such as NMP.
It is important to know the nature of the chemistry that will be used so the microprocessor 96 (described below in conjunction with
During testing of the Dual Solenoid Induction Cleaner the chemistries were layered, changed or alternated between different chemistries, and different time sequences determined using manual shut off valves and a stop watch. The engines being tested were checked with a borescope before any induction cleaning was done. Then the engines were cleaned with different chemistries and different timed sequences. After each of the cleaning processes the engines were re-inspected with the borescope. The result of how much carbon was removed from the engine with each of the chemistries and time sequences was then taken as data. This data was then used to design the Dual Solenoid Induction Cleaner. The manual shut off valves and a stop watch provided a quicker way to collect data from engines that had been cleaned. This data was then analyzed and the Dual Induction Cleaner run profiles, where the “first run time”, and the “second run time”, the “pause time”, and the number of cycles (or the cycle time) were then programmed. Additionally, run profiles can be programmed where only a single chemistry is to be used. All such run profiles can be stored in the microprocessor. However, if the Dual Induction Cleaner is set up to run only certain, preselected chemistries, microprocessor 96 need only store the run profiles that can be used for such preselected chemistries. The use of manual shut off valves and a stop watch also demonstrates that these timed stage sequences can be accomplished manually, without a microprocessor or other electronic controls. Thus, anyone versed in the art could manually control these chemical delivery sequences to accomplish the same results.
In the past the ignition discharge was used for determining if the engine was running. However on modern vehicles it is extremely difficult to connect to the ignition system on the vehicle. Thus, the novel method described herein was developed. After testing different methods and using different sensors in order to determine if the engine is running, the accelerometer was found to provide the best results for this application. However, many other types of sensors which read the vibrations, oscillations or air pressure pulses from the engine (such as a microphone, tailpipe pressure transducer, crankcase pressure transducer, or induction pressure transducer) could also be used for the engine run sensor. Also, as those skilled in the art will appreciate, such an engine run sensor can be used controlling other engine testing and/or maintenance procedures based at least in part on the signals from such a sensor.
In order to observe the chemistry delivery from various nozzles an apparatus was built as shown in
Once the testing was concluded with the wet and dry vacuum, an apparatus was built as seen in
Different prior art nozzles were tested in conjunction with the apparatus illustrated in
During development of nozzle 41 many different nozzle types were built and tested. It was found that a straight tube that is open on both ends and is inserted into air bleed nozzle 89 (air bleed nozzle is illustrated in
The preferred design for the induction cleaning nozzle 41 is shown in
In
In
With reference to
Thus, those skilled in the art will appreciate the design details of nozzle 41 can be varied to maximize the ability to delivery chemistry to all interior surfaces of the induction system. They should appreciate that size of the droplets and the spray pattern are affected by factors such as the particular chemistry used (and its associated viscosity and flash point), the chemistry delivery pressure, the size, shape and number of slots, the shape of surface 111, the configuration of engraved lines 114, and the manner in which the lines are produced. With the use of these design parameters for nozzle 41 many advantages can be observed. Since the induction cleaning chemistry can be delivered to the carbon deposit sites throughout the induction system the carbon removal from all such sites can be accomplished. Additionally, no induction or air filter boots will need to be removed. If a MAF sensor is used it will still be intact and be able to send air weight data to the ECU. Since the engine and sensors are all intact the engine will run normally during induction cleaning without setting any Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTC). This will allow the throttle and RPM to be changed during induction cleaning. With the throttle opened or during snap throttle events the air column flowing into the engine has greater energy which allows the selected induction cleaning chemistry to have more force when impacting the carbon deposit sites, thus having a greater cleaning impact. Another advantage is the nozzle will work in gasoline based engines or diesel based engines as both style engines have an induction system with an opening or port into the intake system. Yet another advantage is that the throttle plate and throttle body on gasoline based engines are not cleaned. If the throttle body around the throttle plate is cleaned the air flow rate around the plate is changed as well. If one is using a pressurized cleaning system and injecting the cleaner across the throttle plate, it will be necessary to have enhanced scan tools that can reset DTC's and relearn idle control functions. (Some manufactures such as Nissan will need the idle air rate relearned when you have finished cleaning the induction system.) If the throttle plate and bore need to be cleaned this can easily be accomplished by using an aerosol can with throttle body cleaner. This allows the service person to decide whether or not to clean the throttle body.
During testing it was found engines that do not have a throttle plate such as but not limited to diesel engines, would puddle the induction cleaning chemistry in the intake manifold during a cleaning procedure. This was found to be a much greater problem when scroll style intake manifolds were used on the engine. In
It has been determined that incorporating a throttle plate attachment on these type engines during the cleaning process can help control this puddling problem.
In
In order for microprocessor 96 to control the hardware a program for the operation of the Dual Solenoid Induction Cleaner was created. The preferred embodiment is shown in
It is important to understand that anyone skilled in the art could alter the above described instrumentation and controls in many ways including, but not limited to, using basic electronics instead of a microprocessor to accomplish these same results. The Dual Solenoid Induction Cleaner could be designed to function with just specific chemistries supplied by a particular manufacturer/distributor. In such a situation a microprocessor with different run profiles for the various available chemistries from competing entities would not be necessary. Control of, for instance, the solenoids could be controlled by basic electronics.
Whereas the drawing and accompanying description have shown and described the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes may be made in the forms and uses of the inventions without affecting the scope thereof.
This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims the priority of application Ser. No. 14/584,684 filed Dec. 29, 2014 which, in turn, is a continuation of and claims the priority of provisional application Ser. No. 62/061,326, filed Oct. 8, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5858942 | Adams et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
8809248 | Huo et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
20030158061 | Ahmandi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040250370 | Augustus | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20140261555 | Hischier et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160215690 | Thompson | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160102606 A1 | Apr 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62061326 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14584684 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 14843016 | US |