In some large industrial inkjet printers, a vacuum belt is used to hold down print media flat for printing. The vacuum belt forms a loop driven by a pulley at one end of the loop around an idler pulley at the other end of the loop. Print media is carried along the upper run of the belt loop through a print zone in which ink is dispensed on to the print media from a printing unit above the belt.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures. The figures are not necessarily to scale.
In some large industrial inkjet printers, a vacuum belt is used to hold down media flat for printing. The vacuum belt forms a loop driven by a pulley at one end of the loop around an idler pulley at the other end of the loop. The print media is carried along the upper run of the belt loop through a print zone where ink is dispensed on to the media from a printing unit above the belt. The printing unit may include multiple print bars that extend across the full width of the belt to print each of multiple corresponding color planes on to the media in a single pass. The vacuum holding down the print media applies strong normal forces to the belt as it moves through the print zone, creating friction that can cause small jumps in belt speed. Also, in response to the substantial operating stresses in an industrial printing environment, a belt drive pulley may develop an eccentric wobble that causes unwanted variations in belt speed through the print zone. An encoder gives feedback to a controller to try to correct for unwanted changes in belt speed, and thus synchronize the position of the print media on the belt to the printing unit dispensing ink, so that that ink is dispensed at the proper locations on the print media. Uncorrected changes in belt speed can adversely affect print quality.
Belts can pull but not push. If the encoder indicates the belt should speed up in the print zone, then the drive pulley is accelerated to pull forward on the upper run of belt. If the encoder indicates the belt should slow in the print zone, then the drive pulley is decelerated to pull back on the lower run of belt. The lower run of belt travels further to the print zone than the upper run of belt. Consequently, it takes longer to slow the belt in the print zone than it does to speed up the belt in the print zone. As a result of this deceleration delay, the belt speed control system is slower to correct changes in belt speed, operating at a lower gain with more dynamic errors than it might without a deceleration delay.
A new drive system has been developed to help more quickly correct the speed of a conveyor belt that carries print media through the print zone in a printer. Rather than driving the belt from one end of the loop, the belt is driven from both ends of the loop with independent drivers. In one example, a pair of pulleys circulates the belt from opposite ends of the belt loop at the urging of a respective pair of drive motors, an encoder measures movement of the belt through the print zone, and the drive motor for each pulley is controlled based on measurements from the encoder. For steady state operation, one pulley pulls the upper run of belt forward through the print zone and the other pulley simultaneously pulls the lower run of belt back at the same linear speed to circulate the belt.
If the encoder indicates the belt should speed up in the print zone, then one pulley is accelerated to pull forward faster on the upper run of belt. If the encoder indicates the belt should slow in the print zone, then the other pulley is decelerated to pull back on the upper run of belt. One pulley pulls forward on the upper run of belt for acceleration and the other pulley pulls back on the upper run of belt for deceleration, so that deceleration occurs without delay compared to acceleration, allowing the speed control system to operate at higher gain with lower dynamic errors.
These and other examples described below and shown in the figures illustrate but do not limit the scope of the patent, which is defined in the Claims following this Description.
As used in this document: “and/or” means one or more of the connected things; and a “computer readable medium” means any non-transitory tangible medium that can embody, contain, store, or maintain instructions and other information for use by a processor and may include, for example, circuits, integrated circuits, ASICs (application specific integrated circuits), hard drives, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), and flash memory.
While any suitable drivers 14, 16 may be used to circulate belt 12, it is expected that each driver 14, 16 usually will be implemented with a pulley and a motor to turn the pulley at the direction of controller 18, for example as described below with reference to
Referring to
In the example shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Rotary encoder 32 measures the rotation of encoder pulley 30 which represents the linear movement of conveyor belt 12 in print zone 66. Accordingly, rotary encoder 32 measures movement of conveyor belt 12 in print zone 76 indirectly through encoder pulley 30 and belt 34. While it is expected that rotary encoder 32 usually will be implemented as an incremental encoder, any suitable rotary encoder may be used. Also, the configuration of an encoder unit 18 in
Encoder unit 18 measures the movement of conveyor belt 12 in the print zone and communicates the measurements to controller 20. Processor 22 on controller 20 executing control instructions 26 controls drivers 14 and 16 to maintain the desired speed of media conveyor belt 12 through the print zone based on movement of media conveyor belt 12 measured by encoder unit 18, for example by correcting for jumps in belt speed and/or wobble in the driver pulleys. If the encoder in unit 18 indicates belt 12 should speed up in the print zone, then controller 20 controls driver 14 to pull forward faster on the upper run of belt 12. If the encoder in unit 18 indicates belt 12 should slow in the print zone, then controller 20 controls driver 16 to pull back on the upper run of belt 12. One driver pulls forward on the upper run of belt for acceleration and the other driver pulls back on the upper run of belt for deceleration. In one example, if the encoder in unit 18 indicates belt 12 should speed up in the print zone, then controller 20 controls drivers 14 and 16 to simultaneously pull forward faster on the upper run of belt 12 and back faster on the lower run of belt 12 and, if the encoder in unit 18 indicates belt 12 should slow in the print zone, then controller 12 controls drivers 14 and 16 to simultaneously pull back on the upper run of belt 12 and forward on the lower run of belt 12.
To further reduce the risk of speed changes adversely effecting print quality, processor 22 on controller 20 executing control instructions 26 may also control the firing signals for printheads 68-74 based on movement of media conveyor belt 12 measured by encoder unit 18, to produce the desired images at the desired locations on the print media, for example by synchronizing the firing signals to changes in belt speed. While it is expected that belt movement will usually be measured by an encoder located in the print zone, for example as shown in
The examples shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the patent, which is defined in the following Claims.
“A”, “an” and “the” used in the claims means one or more. For example, “an endless conveyor belt” means one or more endless conveyor belts and subsequent reference to “the conveyor belt” means the one or more endless conveyor belts.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
21180017 | Jun 2021 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3889801 | Boyer | Jun 1975 | A |
4753119 | Kuspert | Jun 1988 | A |
5507481 | Meyer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5757407 | Rezanka | May 1998 | A |
5931090 | Ohkawa | Aug 1999 | A |
6179419 | Rasmussen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6290351 | Merz | Sep 2001 | B1 |
7914099 | Loh et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8839941 | Fehr et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020018097 | Kitahara et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030038420 | Cleary et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050046667 | Ando et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060186593 | Shibuya | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070045939 | Toya | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090301237 | Everman | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100244364 | Komiyama et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110128557 | Kinoshita et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110293346 | Sato | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20140178115 | Fujisawa et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140240423 | Cressman et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20170043598 | Sanaei et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180281472 | Terradellas Callau et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190291475 | Ota | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20200230981 | Gunji | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200254789 | Martin et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20220402282 | Veis et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0193567 | Dec 1987 | EP |
1655141 | May 2006 | EP |
3121021 | Jan 2017 | EP |
3308969 | Apr 2018 | EP |
3392048 | Oct 2018 | EP |
3594005 | Jan 2020 | EP |
57-156947 | Sep 1982 | JP |
07-187441 | Jul 1995 | JP |
07-281495 | Oct 1995 | JP |
4057115 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2019-001646 | Jan 2019 | JP |
2021142326 | Jul 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bell-Everman, “Linear Motion Engineering Guide”, Oct. 2018 [Online] Available at: https://www.bell-everman.com/linear-motion-engineering-guide. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220402277 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |