The present disclosure generally relates to power converters.
DC/DC converters are a type of power supply which converts an input DC voltage to a different output DC voltage. Such converters typically include a transformer that is electrically coupled via a switching circuit between a voltage source and a load. Converters known as forward converters include a main switch connected between the voltage source and the primary winding of the transformer to provide forward power transfer to the secondary winding of the transformer when the switch is on and conducting. A metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) device is typically used for the switch.
Power converter designs are often constrained by various requirements, such as efficiency, input voltage range, output voltage, power density, and footprint area. These constraints require certain performance tradeoffs. For instance, achieving higher efficiencies may require a more narrow input voltage range. To further improve efficiencies, active-reset schemes and synchronous rectifications are often employed. These synchronous rectification schemes can either be active-control or self-driven.
A limitation of forward converters is that it may be necessary to reset the transformer core to prevent saturation (i.e., discharge the magnetizing current of the transformer during the off period of the main switch). This limitation results from the unipolar character of the transformer core excitation. Techniques exist for resetting the transformer of a forward converter. One such technique is to include a resistor-capacitor-diode (RCD) network in parallel with the primary winding. The RCD network clamps the voltage on the switch to the minimal peak voltage consistent with a given source voltage and switch duty cycle, thereby eliminating the need for dead time while allowing for a wide range of duty cycles. This tends to reduce the voltage stress applied to the switch. Nevertheless, this transformer resetting technique reduces the efficiency of the converter due to the dissipation of the magnetizing energy accumulated in the transformer during the on period of the switch. Instead of being recycled, this magnetizing energy is partially converted into heat by the RCD network.
Another method of transformer resetting is to use a series connection of a capacitor and an auxiliary switch connected across the transformer winding either on the primary side or on the secondary side (referred to as an “active clamp” or “active reset”). When the main switch is turned off, the auxiliary switch is turned on, and vice versa. Thus, magnetizing energy in the transformer is transferred to the clamping capacitor, and the clamping capacitor resonates with the magnetizing inductance to maintain the necessary level of reset voltage. This active clamp reset provides non-dissipative reset of the transformer and minimal voltage stress on the main switch under steady state conditions as dead time is almost zero. For this reason, the active clamp method is compatible with self-driven synchronous rectification.
In switching power supply circuits employing synchronous rectifiers, the diodes are replaced by power transistors to obtain a lower on-state voltage drop. The synchronous rectifier generally uses n-channel MOSFETs rather than diodes to avoid the turn-on voltage drop of diodes which can be significant for low output voltage power supplies. The transistors are biased to conduct when a diode would have been conducting from anode to cathode, and conversely, are gated to block current when a diode would have been blocking from cathode to anode. Although MOSFETs usually serve this purpose, bipolar transistors and other active semiconductor switches may also be suitable.
In these synchronous rectifier circuits, the gate signals can be self-driven, i.e., the gate signal can be tied to the power circuit, or controlled-driven, i.e., the gate signal is derived from some point in the circuit and goes through some active processing circuit before being fed to the MOSFET gate driver. In a power converter, the synchronous rectifier which conducts during the non-conducting period of the main power switch (switches) may be referred to as a freewheeling or “catch” synchronous rectifier. The synchronous rectifier which conducts during the conducting period of the main power switch (switches) may be referred to as a forward synchronous rectifier.
In some applications, when a power converter is first turned on, a pre-existing voltage may exist at the output terminal. Such pre-existing voltage may be referred to as a pre-bias voltage, pre-charge voltage, reverse bias or back bias. This pre-bias voltage may result from an external voltage source (e.g., a load, another power converter), or may exist as a residual charge across one or more output capacitors of the power converter. As noted above, when synchronous rectifiers are used instead of diodes, such rectifiers (e.g., MOSFETs) allow current to flow through the switch in either direction. Thus, under some operating conditions, such as pre-bias startup, operation of the output switches may allow a reverse current to flow from the output terminal of the power converter to ground through an output inductor of the power converter. That is, in such instances the power converter acts as a current sink rather than a current source. Among other things, such undesirable operation may cause the output voltage to drop and may disturb or damage one or more components of the power converter.
An average current mode control (ACMC) controller for a power converter, the power converter including a power transformer having a primary winding electrically coupleable to an input voltage node and a secondary winding electrically coupleable to an output voltage node, a primary control circuit electrically coupled to the primary winding, a secondary control circuit electrically coupled to the secondary winding, the secondary control circuit including first and second synchronous rectifying elements including respective first and second control nodes, may be summarized as including a magnetic communicator circuit including a selectively controllable switch; and a coupling transformer including a first primary winding, a second primary winding, and a secondary winding, the secondary winding electrically coupled to a secondary side DC voltage supply circuit including a DC supply rectifier and a DC supply capacitor which provides a secondary side DC voltage supply on the DC supply capacitor of the secondary side DC voltage supply circuit, the first and second primary windings selectively coupled to a primary side DC voltage supply via the controllable switch whereby the secondary side DC voltage supply is developed on the DC supply capacitor of the secondary side DC voltage supply circuit by selectively controlling the controllable switch into conduction, the secondary winding electrically coupled to a secondary side feedback signal node, and the second primary winding electrically coupled to a sampling circuit including a sampling rectifier and a sampling capacitor whereby a secondary side feedback signal at the secondary side feedback signal node is transferred to the second primary winding by the selective controlling of the controllable switch into conduction, whereby a primary side feedback voltage is developed on the sampling capacitor of the sampling circuit by the selective controlling of the controllable switch into conduction, the primary side feedback voltage electrically coupleable to the primary control circuit of the power converter.
The ACMC controller may further include a voltage error amplifier circuit including an input node and an output node, the input node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the power converter; and a current error amplifier circuit including an input node and an output node, the input node of the current error amplifier circuit electrically coupled to the output node of the voltage error amplifier circuit, and the output node of the current error amplifier electrically coupled to the secondary side feedback signal node. The voltage error amplifier circuit may include an operational amplifier which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to the secondary side DC voltage supply to receive power therefrom. The current error amplifier circuit may include an operational amplifier which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to the secondary side DC voltage supply to receive power therefrom.
The ACMC controller may further include a common control node which is representative of an output signal of the voltage error amplifier circuit, the common control node coupleable to a common control node of another power converter to provide current sharing operation between the power converter and the other power converter.
The ACMC controller may further include a current direction detector circuit operatively coupled to sense a direction of an output current of the power converter and, responsive to detecting output current flows into the power converter, the current direction detector circuit causes the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements to control the first and second synchronous rectifying elements to be in an non-conduction state. The current direction detector circuit may include a comparator which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to the secondary side DC voltage supply to receive power therefrom. The current direction detector circuit may include a control switch electrically coupled to each of the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements, the control switch including a control switch control node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the power converter. The current direction detector may include a control switch electrically coupled to each of the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements via respective first and second diodes, the control switch including a control switch control node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the power converter via a resistor.
An active-clamp forward converter may be summarized as including a transformer having a primary winding and a secondary winding, the secondary winding electrically coupleable to an output voltage node; a primary circuit electrically coupled to the primary winding, the primary winding electrically coupleable to an input voltage node; a secondary circuit electrically coupled to the secondary winding, the secondary circuit including first and second synchronous rectifying elements including respective first and second control nodes; and an average current mode control (ACMC) converter, including a magnetic communicator circuit including a selectively controllable switch; and a coupling transformer including a first primary winding, a second primary winding, and a secondary winding, the secondary winding electrically coupled to a secondary side DC voltage supply circuit including a DC supply rectifier and a DC supply capacitor which provides a secondary side DC voltage supply on the DC supply capacitor of the secondary side DC voltage supply circuit, the first and second primary windings selectively coupled to a primary side DC voltage supply via the controllable switch whereby the secondary side DC voltage supply is developed on the DC supply capacitor of the secondary side DC voltage supply circuit by selectively controlling the controllable switch into conduction, the secondary winding electrically coupled to a secondary side feedback signal node, and the second primary winding electrically coupled to a sampling circuit including a sampling rectifier and a sampling capacitor whereby a secondary side feedback signal at the secondary side feedback signal node is transferred to the second primary winding by the selective controlling of the controllable switch into conduction, whereby a primary side feedback voltage is developed on the sampling capacitor of the sampling circuit by the selective controlling of the controllable switch into conduction, the primary side feedback voltage electrically coupleable to the primary control circuit of the forward converter.
The active-clamp forward converter may further include a voltage error amplifier circuit including an input node and an output node, the input node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the forward converter; and a current error amplifier circuit including an input node and an output node, the input node of the current error amplifier electrically coupled to the output node of the voltage error amplifier circuit, and the output node of the current error amplifier electrically coupled to the secondary side feedback signal node. The voltage error amplifier circuit may include an operational amplifier which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to the secondary side DC voltage supply to receive power therefrom. The current error amplifier circuit may include an operational amplifier which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to the secondary side DC voltage supply to receive power therefrom.
The active-clamp forward converter may further include a common control node which is representative of an output signal of the voltage error amplifier circuit, the common control node coupleable to a common control node of another forward converter to provide current sharing operation between the forward converter and the other forward converter.
The active-clamp forward converter may further include a current direction detector circuit operatively coupled to sense a direction of an output current of the forward converter and, responsive to detecting output current flows into the forward converter, the current direction detector circuit causes the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements to control the first and second synchronous rectifying elements to be in an non-conduction state. The current direction detector circuit may include a comparator which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to the secondary side DC voltage supply to receive power therefrom. The current direction detector may include a control switch electrically coupled to each of the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements, the control switch including a control switch control node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the forward converter. The current direction detector may include a control switch electrically coupled to each of the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements via respective first and second diodes, the control switch including a control switch control node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the forward converter via a resistor.
An average current mode control (ACMC) controller for a power converter, the power converter including a power transformer having a primary winding electrically coupleable to an input voltage node and a secondary winding electrically coupleable to an output voltage node, a primary control circuit electrically coupled to the primary winding, a secondary control circuit electrically coupled to the secondary winding, the secondary control circuit including first and second synchronous rectifying elements including respective first and second control nodes, may be summarized as including a voltage error amplifier circuit including an input node and an output node, the input node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the power converter; a current error amplifier circuit including an input node and an output node, the input node of the current error amplifier electrically coupled to the output node of the voltage error amplifier circuit, and the output node of the current error amplifier electrically coupled to a secondary side feedback signal node; and a current direction detector circuit operatively coupled to sense a direction of an output current of the power converter and, responsive to detecting output current flows into the power converter, the current direction detector circuit causes the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements to control the first and second synchronous rectifying elements to be in an non-conduction state. The current direction detector circuit may include a comparator which may include a supply input node electrically coupled to a secondary side DC voltage supply circuit to receive power therefrom. The current direction detector may include a control switch electrically coupled to each of the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements, the control switch including a control switch control node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the power converter.
The ACMC controller may further include a magnetic communicator circuit including a selectively controllable switch; and a coupling transformer including a first primary winding, a second primary winding, and a secondary winding, the secondary winding electrically coupled to a secondary side DC voltage supply circuit including a DC supply rectifier and a DC supply capacitor which provides a secondary side DC voltage supply on the DC supply capacitor of the secondary side DC voltage supply circuit, the first and second primary windings selectively coupled to a primary side DC voltage supply via the controllable switch whereby the secondary side DC voltage supply is developed on the DC supply capacitor of the secondary side DC voltage supply circuit by selectively controlling the controllable switch into conduction, the secondary winding electrically coupled to the secondary side feedback signal node, and the second primary winding electrically coupled to a sampling circuit including a sampling rectifier and a sampling capacitor whereby a secondary side feedback signal at the secondary side feedback signal node is transferred to the second primary winding by the selective controlling of the controllable switch into conduction, whereby a primary side feedback voltage is developed on the sampling capacitor of the sampling circuit by the selective controlling of the controllable switch into conduction, the primary side feedback voltage electrically coupleable to the primary control circuit of the power converter. The current direction detector may include a control switch electrically coupled to each of the first and second control nodes of the respective first and second synchronous rectifying elements via respective first and second diodes, the control switch including a control switch control node electrically coupled to the output voltage node of the power converter via a resistor.
The ACMC controller may further include a common control node which is representative of an output signal of the voltage error amplifier circuit, the common control node coupleable to a common control node of another power converter to provide current sharing operation between the power converter and the other power converter.
In the drawings, identical reference numbers identify similar elements or acts. The sizes and relative positions of elements in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale. For example, the shapes of various elements and angles are not necessarily drawn to scale, and some of these elements may be arbitrarily enlarged and positioned to improve drawing legibility. Further, the particular shapes of the elements as drawn, are not necessarily intended to convey any information regarding the actual shape of the particular elements, and may have been solely selected for ease of recognition in the drawings.
In the following description, certain specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of various disclosed implementations. However, one skilled in the relevant art will recognize that implementations may be practiced without one or more of these specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures associated with computer systems, server computers, and/or communications networks have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring descriptions of the implementations.
Unless the context requires otherwise, throughout the specification and claims that follow, the word “comprising” is synonymous with “including,” and is inclusive or open-ended (i.e., does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method acts).
Reference throughout this specification to “one implementation” or “an implementation” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the implementation is included in at least one implementation. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one implementation” or “in an implementation” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same implementation. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more implementations.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It should also be noted that the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
The headings and Abstract of the Disclosure provided herein are for convenience only and do not interpret the scope or meaning of the implementations.
One or more implementations of the present disclosure provide discrete implementations of power converter controllers which utilize average current mode control (ACMC) with pre-bias startup and current sharing capabilities for power converters which utilize an active reset scheme and self-driven synchronous rectification (SDSR). One or more implementations discussed herein solve or improve inherent issues with SDSR including, but not limited to, pre-bias startup, current sharing and redundancy capabilities. Inherent to SDSR is an oscillation that occurs on the synchronous MOSFETs during shutdown, which is not a desirable behavior. Without a control method as discussed herein, an externally applied output voltage may turn-on the synchronous rectifiers causing the power converter to sink current instead of sourcing current. One or more implementations discussed herein solve one or more issues with SDSR power converters utilizing a relatively few number of discrete components. Such implementations of the present disclosure may be ideal for hybrid applications, especially for applications where radiation tolerance and minimal part counts are important for high power density.
More particularly, the systems and methods discussed herein may allow one or more power converters to start up into regulation with an external voltage source already applied to its output terminal. As noted above, this feature may be referred to as pre-bias startup. Further, multiple power converters may be connected in parallel to deliver more power to a load than is possible with a single power converter. As discussed further below, this current sharing feature may be performed by connecting the output terminals of multiple power converters together and connecting respective “current sharing” or “common control” nodes of the power converters together. Such feature may also provide redundancy in the event of failure of one or more of the multiple power converters and/or failure of one or more power sources to which the one or more power converters are connected.
A secondary winding L5 of the transformer T1 is connected to an output node VO through a synchronous rectifier including MOSFET rectifying devices M4 and M5. Each rectifying device M4 and M5 includes a body diode. With the power switch M2 conducting, the input voltage VIN is applied across the primary winding L4. The secondary winding L5 is oriented in polarity to respond to the primary voltage with a current flow through an output inductor L6, through a load R6 connected to the output node VO, and back through the MOSFET rectifier device M4 to the secondary winding L5. Continuity of the current flow in the output inductor L6 when the power switch M2 is non-conducting is maintained by the current path provided by the conduction of the MOSFET rectifier device M5. An output filter capacitor C7 shunts the output of the power converter 100.
Conductivity of the two rectifier devices M4 and M5 is controlled by SDSR logic 104 which may optionally receive signals by a primary active-reset pulse-width modulated (PWM) controller 106. The active-reset controller 106 may include, for example, one or more oscillators, comparators, and/or flip-flops. The output of the active reset controller 106 may provide a PWM drive signal to the main switch M2 and the auxiliary switch M3.
The power converter 100 may also include an ACMC controller 110 which operates to control the power converter utilizing average current mode control. Generally, current mode control is a two-loop system which includes an outer voltage control loop and an inner current control loop.
Compared to ACMC which is implemented in the present disclosure, peak current control mode has some deficiencies. In particular, peak current control mode operates by directly comparing the output inductor current waveform to a current program level, set by the outer voltage loop, at two inputs of a PWM comparator. The inner current control loop has a low gain and thus cannot correct for some deficiencies, including poor noise immunity, requirement for slope compensation, and peak-to-average current error.
To remedy some performance issues with peak current mode control, ACMC is used in the implementations of the present disclosure. ACMC overcomes some or all of these deficiencies by providing a high gain integrating current error amplifier into the inner current control loop. Generally, a current error signal is amplified and compared to a relatively large oscillator ramp (e.g., sawtooth) at the inputs of a PWM comparator provided by the active reset controller 106.
As shown in
The voltage error amplifier 112 receives the output voltage VO of the power converter 100 as input and controls an outer voltage control loop by comparing the output voltage VO to a fixed reference voltage. This voltage error signal is fed to the current error amplifier 116.
The current sensor 114 is operative to sense the output current of the power converter 100, and to generate an output signal which is representative of (e.g., proportional to) the output current of the power converter 100. The current sensor 114 may include one or more sensing resistors, current sense transformers, and/or other current sensing circuitry, for example.
The current error amplifier 116 may be an integrating current error amplifier which controls an inner current control loop of the ACMC controller 110. The current error amplifier 116 may compare a signal received from the current sensor 114 to a current program signal supplied by the voltage error amplifier 112.
The current direction detector 118 receives the output signal from the voltage error amplifier 112 which is used to determine the direction of the output current of the power converter 100. The current direction detector 118 primarily functions to detect the direction of the output current ILOAD across the load, which in the schematic diagrams of
The voltage source V1 is representative of a source of voltage, such as another power converter coupled in parallel to the power converter 100, etc. As discussed further below, this feature allows for pre-bias startup and output current sharing. In at least one implementation, during a power loss the current direction detector 118 utilizes the output voltage VO to turn off the MOSFETs M4 and M5, which advantageously functions to preserve the output voltage VO by preventing the power converter 100 from sinking current which would otherwise discharge the output capacitor C7 and may cause undesirable behavior or damage to the power converter 100.
The magnetic communicator 120 provides multiple bidirectional functions. First, the magnetic communicator 120 provides isolated transformer-coupled magnetic feedback to the active reset controller 106. Generally, the magnetic communicator 120 employs a transformer, a modulator, and a demodulator to allow optimization of a feedback path which provides an isolation barrier 122 between an input side and an output side of the power converter 100. Second, the magnetic communicator 120 receives a primary side voltage supply VCCP and provides a secondary side voltage supply VCCS which may be used by one or more components of the voltage error amplifier 112, the current sensor 114, the current error amplifier 116 or the current direction detector 118. Third, the magnetic communicator 120 provides an input to the current direction detector 118 supply input (i.e., VCCS). When the secondary supply voltage VCCS disappears due to a power loss (e.g., shutdown), the current direction detector 118 keeps the gate signals G1 and G2 low, which turns off the synchronous MOSFETs M4 and M5 to prevent them from conducting current.
The current error amplifier 116 includes the op amp U2, resistors R4, R9, R10, and a capacitor C2. The op amp U2 may be powered by the secondary side voltage supply VCCS provided by the magnetic communicator 120. An output node FB1 of the current error amplifier 116 is provided to the magnetic communicator 120, as discussed further below. To achieve average current control, the inner current loop is controlled by the op amp U2. The output of the op amp U1 of the voltage error amplifier 112 is compared to a current sense signal from the current sensor 114 which comprises a current source I1, a resistor R12 and a Zener diode D9. The current source I1 is not literal. Rather, the current source I1 represents the transducing of the average current of the output inductor L6 to a representative voltage conversion using R12.
Referring to
When the switch M1 is turned on, the winding L1 of the transformer T2 is coupled to a primary side voltage supply VCCP. This causes a magnetizing energy to build up in the transformer T2. At this time, the voltage across nodes T2C-D of winding L2 is negative at the anode of a diode D10 so the diode D10 is not conducting. A diode D6 prevents the voltage VCCP from appearing at the secondary side of T2 and interfering with the current error amplifier 116. When the switch M1 is turned on, the VCCP voltage is transferred from T2A-B to T2E-F, which is then peak-charged into the capacitor C5 by diodes D5 and D3 to supply the secondary side voltage supply VCCS for the op amp U2 of the current error amplifier 116 and the op amp U1 of the voltage error amplifier 112.
When the switch M1 is turned off, the magnetizing energy stored in the transformer T2 returns in the form of a flyback voltage. That voltage is clamped by error signal FB2 via diodes D6 and D4. The current error amplifier 116 has a low impedance provided by an emitter follower buffer Q3. During the flyback time, the error signal FB2 is fed back to the primary side of the transformer T2 by the voltage reflected across nodes T2C and T2D which is then peak-charged into the capacitor C6 through the diode D10 to form the primary-side feedback signal VFB1 for the active reset controller 106. The conditioned load voltage VFB2 is equal to the voltage at the node FB2 plus the forward diode drop of the diode D6. A resistor R20 may be provided to control the discharge rate of the capacitor C6.
As discussed above, the current direction detector 118 functions to determine whether the output current ILOAD flows into or out of the power converter 100. The current direction detector 118 in this example includes a comparator U3, the Zener diode D9, resistors R13, R16, R17, and R18, diodes D7 and D8, and switches Q4 and Q5. As discussed above, the current source I1 provides a signal which is representative of the average load current ILOAD. The current source I1 may comprise a current transformer on the primary power transformer T1, a current sensing resistor, etc.
In operation, the current direction detector 118 turns off the synchronous MOSFETs M4 and M5 when it is determined that current is flowing into the power converter 100 rather than out of the power converter. This may be achieved by directing the synchronous rectification MOSFETs M4 and M5 to remain off by turning the switch Q4 off and turning the switch Q5 on. In particular, when a “negative current” (i.e., into the power converter 100) is detected by the comparator U3, the gate signals G1 and G2 are pulled to ground through conduction of the diodes D7 and D8 to prevent the synchronous MOSFETs M4 and M5 from conducting current. This occurs when the switch Q5 is on, the switch Q4 is off, and the output of the comparator U3 is low (i.e., 0 V). For the output of the comparator U3 to be low, the positive input of the comparator U3 must be less than the negative input of the comparator U3. The negative input of the comparator U3 is a fixed positive voltage formed by the Zener diode D9.
As shown in
Thus, the synchronous MOSFETs M4 and M5 are kept turned off when the output voltage VO is greater than the base-emitter voltage (Vbe) of the switch Q5 due to an external source (e.g., source V1) and the output of the comparator U3 is low, which indicates a negative or reverse current into the power converter 100. The synchronous MOSFETs are also kept turned off when the secondary side supply voltage VCCS is low (e.g., due to loss of power).
As briefly discussed above, in one or more implementations the magnetic communicator 120 provides at least three functions. First, the magnetic communicator 120 provides the secondary side voltage supply VCCS when the switch M1 is turned on. Second, the magnetic communicator 120 provides isolated magnetic feedback from the secondary side to the primary side during the portion of the cycle when the switch M1 is turned off. Third, the magnetic communicator 120 provides the secondary side voltage supply VCCS to the comparator U3 of the current direction detector 118. When the secondary side supply voltage VCCS is lost (e.g., shutdown, inhibit), the output of the comparator U3 goes low, which turns the switch Q4 off and turns the switch Q5 on. As discussed above, this feature keeps the gate nodes G1 and G2 of the synchronous MOSFETs M5 and M4, respectively, low, which keeps the MOSFETs M4 and M5 turned off to prevent current from flowing into the power converter 100.
As noted above, inherent to SDSR is an oscillation on the synchronous MOSFETs (e.g., MOSFETs M4 and M5) that occurs during shutdown. The implementations discussed herein prevent this behavior by removing the secondary voltage VCCS from the comparator U3 of the current direction detector 118 when the switch M1 turns off. This event causes the switch Q4 to turn off and the switch Q5 to turn on, thereby keeping the gate nodes G1 and G2 clamped to ground plus a diode forward voltage drop of diodes D7 and D8, respectively. As a result, the synchronous MOSFETs M4 and M5 no longer oscillate when the power converter 100 is shut down, and the output capacitor(s) C7 is no longer discharged.
As shown in
Referring back to
In the plot 500 of
As discussed above, the output signals Vca1out, Vca2out of the two current error amplifiers U2 are also the feedback signals for the respective converters 100-1 and 100-2. The waveforms shown in the plot 500 of
As discussed above, the implementations discussed herein provide several advantages. The implementations provide improved line and load transient responses, which allows such to be used in power converters with excellent stability and fast response. Further, the implementations discussed herein provide current sharing capabilities with a single-control node by connecting multiple converters together via the common control node IB, as shown in
One or more implementations discussed herein also provide minimal part counts, which is beneficial for hybrid or other applications, and also provide enhanced radiation tolerance at low costs due to the use of discrete components. As discussed above, the implementations discussed herein prevent the synchronous MOSFETs M4 and M5 from oscillating during shutdown. Further, the state of the average current in the output inductor L6 is used for multiple functions (e.g., detecting output current direction, setting current limit).
The foregoing detailed description has set forth various implementations of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, schematics, and examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, schematics, and examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one implementation, the present subject matter may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). Those of skill in the art will recognize that many of the methods or algorithms set out herein may employ additional acts, may omit some acts, and/or may execute acts in a different order than specified.
The various implementations described above can be combined to provide further implementations. To the extent that they are not inconsistent with the specific teachings and definitions herein, all of the U.S. patents, U.S. patent application publications, U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this specification, including but not limited to: U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 15/178,968, filed Jun. 10, 2016, are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety. Aspects of the implementations can be modified, if necessary, to employ systems, circuits and concepts of the various patents, applications and publications to provide yet further implementations.
These and other changes can be made to the implementations in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific implementations disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible implementations along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3144627 | Dunnabeck et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3201728 | McWhirter | Aug 1965 | A |
3699424 | Hart et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3831080 | Zabert et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3886433 | Watanabe | May 1975 | A |
4128868 | Gamble | Dec 1978 | A |
4255784 | Rosa | Mar 1981 | A |
4337569 | Pierce | Jul 1982 | A |
4354162 | Wright | Oct 1982 | A |
4482945 | Wolf et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4533986 | Jones | Aug 1985 | A |
4618812 | Kawakami | Oct 1986 | A |
4635002 | Riebeek | Jan 1987 | A |
4683527 | Rosa | Jul 1987 | A |
4719552 | Albach et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4743835 | Bossé et al. | May 1988 | A |
4813126 | Williamson | Mar 1989 | A |
4814735 | Williamson | Mar 1989 | A |
4833437 | Williamson | May 1989 | A |
4837535 | Konishi et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4920309 | Szepesi | Apr 1990 | A |
4956626 | Hoppe et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4992919 | Lee et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5031066 | Wagner et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5068774 | Rosa | Nov 1991 | A |
5148357 | Paice | Sep 1992 | A |
5329695 | Traskos et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5343383 | Shinada et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5396165 | Hwang et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5418502 | Ma et al. | May 1995 | A |
5430640 | Lee | Jul 1995 | A |
5436550 | Arakawa | Jul 1995 | A |
5469124 | O'Donnell et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5481225 | Lumsden et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5521807 | Chen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5631822 | Silberkleit et al. | May 1997 | A |
5638262 | Brown | Jun 1997 | A |
5691629 | Belnap | Nov 1997 | A |
5694303 | Silberkleit et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708571 | Shinada | Jan 1998 | A |
5734563 | Shinada | Mar 1998 | A |
5774347 | Nakanishi | Jun 1998 | A |
5777866 | Jacobs et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5831418 | Kitagawa | Nov 1998 | A |
5903504 | Chevallier et al. | May 1999 | A |
5917716 | Cho | Jun 1999 | A |
5963438 | Chen | Oct 1999 | A |
5991171 | Cheng | Nov 1999 | A |
6002183 | Iversen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002318 | Werner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6038148 | Farrington et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043705 | Jiang | Mar 2000 | A |
6091616 | Jacobs et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101104 | Eng | Aug 2000 | A |
6137373 | Mori | Oct 2000 | A |
6141232 | Weinmeier et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6157180 | Kuo | Dec 2000 | A |
6157282 | Hopkinson | Dec 2000 | A |
6169674 | Owen | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191964 | Boylan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198647 | Zhou et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6232832 | Kirkpatrick, II | May 2001 | B1 |
6236194 | Manabe et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6252781 | Rinne et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6304463 | Krugly | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335872 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343026 | Perry | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6426884 | Sun | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456511 | Wong | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6469478 | Curtin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472852 | Lethellier | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487097 | Popescu | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490183 | Zhang | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6492890 | Woznlczka | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496395 | Tokunaga | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6545534 | Mehr | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563719 | Hua | May 2003 | B1 |
6594163 | Tsai | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617948 | Kuroshima et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6618274 | Boylan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643151 | Nebrigic et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664660 | Tsai | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6697955 | Malik et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707650 | Diallo et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711039 | Brkovic | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6734775 | Chung | May 2004 | B2 |
6760235 | Lin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6798177 | Liu et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6839246 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850048 | Orr et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6998901 | Lee | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012413 | Ye | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7046492 | Fromm et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7061212 | Phadke | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7095215 | Liu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7129808 | Roebke et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164584 | Walz | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7183727 | Ferguson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199563 | Ikezawa | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7202644 | Nitta et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7206210 | Harnett et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212416 | Kyono | May 2007 | B2 |
7224590 | Lin | May 2007 | B2 |
7227754 | Griesinger et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242168 | Müller et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286376 | Yang | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7304828 | Shvartsman | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7339804 | Uchida | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369024 | Yargole et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7443278 | Kawahata et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7480158 | Moromizato et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7515005 | Dan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7564706 | Herbert | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7577539 | Hubanks et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7579901 | Yamashita | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7589982 | Wang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602273 | Yoshikawa | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616459 | Huynh et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616464 | Phadke et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7663896 | Na | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7730981 | McCabe et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742318 | Fu et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7773392 | Matsumoto | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786712 | Williams | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7847519 | Ho | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7884317 | Casper | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7893804 | Kaveh Ahangar et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7933131 | Cho et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8009004 | Ahangar et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040699 | Huynh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8067992 | Chen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8072195 | Aan De Stegge et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8102162 | Moussaoui et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8233293 | Selvaraju et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8279631 | Yang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8350659 | Dziubek et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358118 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8373403 | Radovic | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8378647 | Yonezawa et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8508195 | Uno | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8520415 | Krishnamoorthy et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8552589 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570006 | Moussaoui et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8649128 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8710820 | Parker | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8736240 | Liu et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8760082 | Yang et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764247 | Pattekar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8810214 | Van Dijk et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8824167 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8829868 | Waltman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8866551 | Lam et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8873263 | Feng et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8885308 | Waltman et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8890630 | Hughes | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9030178 | Chang et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9041378 | Lam et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9106142 | Huang et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9160228 | Parker et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9230726 | Parker et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9293999 | Lam et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
20020015320 | Mochikawa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020071300 | Jang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030048644 | Nagai | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040125523 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040169498 | Goder et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178776 | Hansen et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178846 | Kuyel et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050122753 | Soldano | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060039172 | Soldano | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060071651 | Ito | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060072349 | Lin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060132105 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132272 | Kitahara et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208717 | Shimizu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212138 | Zhang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060220629 | Saito et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227582 | Wei et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070041221 | Phadke | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070152644 | Vinn | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165429 | Selvaraju | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070257733 | Laletin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080024951 | Mortensen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031014 | Young | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080111531 | Hasegawa | May 2008 | A1 |
20080150670 | Chung et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174396 | Choi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186121 | Kawahata et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080197724 | Cullen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080303606 | Liu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090067206 | Oguchi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128110 | DeLurio et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154204 | Taylor | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167432 | van den Heuvel | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090174381 | Ojanen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090213623 | Yang | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231029 | Randlett | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090237057 | Dishman et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090256547 | Akyildiz et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273431 | Hurst | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295350 | Yamada | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302775 | Alexandrov | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321045 | Hernon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321046 | Hernon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100008112 | Feng et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014330 | Chang et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100117715 | Ariyama | May 2010 | A1 |
20100176755 | Hoadley et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100253309 | Xi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100283442 | Nakashima | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110090038 | Perchlik | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103105 | Wei et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110169471 | Nagasawa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110255315 | Ono | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110317453 | Fan | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120268227 | Howes et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130021008 | Hume et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130049918 | Fu et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130121043 | Pietkiewicz | May 2013 | A1 |
20130201631 | Parker et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130245854 | Rinne et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130299148 | Hernon et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140015629 | Zeng et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016356 | Furmanczyk et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140118946 | Tong et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140192561 | Plesnik | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254206 | Ou | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140292288 | Yan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140327417 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150137412 | Schalansky | May 2015 | A1 |
20150229149 | Fahlenkamp et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160190948 | Yang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160261194 | Lam et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2307390 | Feb 1999 | CN |
101326705 | Dec 2008 | CN |
201219235 | Apr 2009 | CN |
102582997 | Feb 2014 | CN |
10404742 | Jun 2015 | CN |
1 933 340 | Jun 2008 | EP |
1071469 | Jun 1967 | GB |
1114013 | May 1968 | GB |
55-1761 | Jan 1980 | JP |
55-13208 | Oct 1980 | JP |
62-32714 | Feb 1987 | JP |
2567069 | Jun 1993 | JP |
8-78252 | Mar 1996 | JP |
2001-320250 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-76799 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-335674 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-173913 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2007-215359 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007-263944 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2008-185389 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2009-81952 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009-100120 | May 2009 | JP |
2009-106012 | May 2009 | JP |
5030216 | Sep 2012 | JP |
10-2007-0118409 | Dec 2007 | KR |
10-2008-0019196 | Mar 2008 | KR |
10-2008-0101784 | Nov 2008 | KR |
10-2009-0075465 | Jul 2009 | KR |
10-2013-0026714 | Mar 2013 | KR |
9941957 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0122444 | Mar 2001 | WO |
02097974 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2011123680 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012100810 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012116263 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2014039982 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014103298 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014152415 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2017015143 | Jan 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Application Guide: Theory of Operation,” MicroPower Direct, retrieved from http://micropowerdirect.com/PDF%20Filed/Application%20Notes/Power%20Supply%20Theory%20of%20Operation.pdf on Apr. 18, 2012, 6 pages. |
“Buck converter,” retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck—converter, on Jun. 23, 2011, 14 pages. |
“EMI Suppression Filters (EMIFIL®) for AC Power Lines,” Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Cat.No. C09E-14, downloaded on Feb. 21, 2014, 27 pages. |
“Maximum Flexible Power (MFP) Single Output Point of Load: Technical Preview—3-6 VDC IN, 7 AMP, Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter,” Crane Aerospace & Electronics Power Solutions, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Step-gap “E” core swing chokes: Improved regulation and higher efficiency are possible when operating at minimum current levels,” Technical Bulletin: Bulletin FC-S4, Magnetics Division, Spang & Company, Butler, Pennsylvania, 2001, 4 pages. |
“Synchronous Rectification Aids Low-Voltage Power Supplies,” Maxim Integrated Products, retrieved from http://www.maxim-ic.com/app-notes/index.mvp/id/652, on Jun. 22, 2011, 6 pages. |
“Application Note 664 Feedback Isolation Augments Power-Supply Safety and Performance,” Maxim Integrated, Jan. 22, 2001, retrieved from https://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/664, 6 pages. |
Beta Dyne, “Synchronous Rectification,” Application Note DC-006, DC/DC Converters, 2002, 3 pages. |
Bottrill, “The Effects of Turning off a Converter with Self-Driven Synchronous Rectifiers,” Power Guru, May 1, 2007, retrieved from http://www.powerguru.org/the-effects-of-turning-off-a-converter-with-self-driven-synchronous-rectifiers/ Jul. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
Chinese Office Action with English Translation dated May 22, 2015, for corresponding CN Application No. 201280016631.1, 15 pages. |
Coates, “Power supplies—3.0 Switched Mode Power Supplies,” www.learnabout-electronics.org, 2007-2013, 20 pages. |
Cuon et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration of Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” Amendment filed Mar. 6, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/333,705, 11 pages. |
Dixon, “Unitrode Application Note Average Current Mode Control of Switching Power Supplies,” Texas Instruments Inc., 1999. |
ECircuit Center, “Op Amp Input Offset Adjustment,” 2002, retrieved from http://www.ecircuitcenter.com/Circuits/op—voff/op—voff2.htm on Mar. 26, 2012, 3 pages. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Apr. 15, 2016 for corresponding European Application No. 13835620.9, 7 pages. |
European Search Report, dated Jul. 5, 2017, for EP Application No. 15822324.8-1804 / 3170057, 11 pages. |
Furmanczyk et al., “AC/DC Power Conversion System and Method of Manufacture of the Same,” Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 25, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/001,312, 9 pages. |
Garcia et al., “Optimal Design for Natural Convection-Cooled Rectifiers,” 18th International Telecommunications Energy Conference, Boston, Oct. 6-10, 1996, 10 pages. |
Hughes et al., “Self Synchronizing Power Converter Apparatus and Method Suitable for Auxiliary Bias for Dynamic Load Applications,” Notice of Allowance dated May 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,217, 10 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 17 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Amendment filed Oct. 7, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 15 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 15 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Amendment filed Apr. 24, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 8 pages. |
Hughes, “Oscillator Apparatus and Method With Wide Adjustable Frequency Range,” Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 14, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,152, 12 pages. |
Hume et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Light Load Conditions,” Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,142, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 31, 2016, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2016/018628, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 21, 2016, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2016/019520, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 31, 2015 for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2015/033321, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 12, 2016, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2016/042582, 11 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Aug. 12, 2002, for PCT/US01/50033, 1 page. |
International Search Report, dated Dec. 20, 2013, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/058784, 3 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 8, 2011, for PCT/US2010/052705, 3 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Jun. 8, 2011, for PCT/US2010/052707, 3 pages. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 14, 2011, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2011/030778, 3 pages. |
Irving et al., “Analysis and Design Optimization of Magnetic-Feedback Control Using Amplitude Modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 24(2):426-433, Feb. 2009. |
Jovanović et al., “Design Considerations for Forward Converter with Synchronous Rectifiers,” Power Conversion Proceedings, pp. 340-350, Oct. 1993. |
King et al., “Active Clamp Control Boosts Forward Converter Efficiency,” Power Electronics Technology, pp. 52-55, Jun. 2003. |
Kristjansson et al., “Solutions to Today's Low Voltage Power Design Challenges Using High-Efficiency, Non-Isolated Point of Load Converters: A Discussion of the Interpoint™ MFP Series™ Point of Load Converter,” Crane Aerospace & Electronics, Power Solutions—Interpoint Products, Redmond, WA, Oct. 2011, Revised Jan. 2012, 25 pages. |
Kuehny et al., “Output Filter for Use With Power Converters, for Example DC/DC Power Converters, for Instance Interpoint MFP POL DC/DC Power Converters,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/547,327, filed Oct. 14, 2011, 14 pages. |
Lam et al., “Automatic Enhanced Self-Driven Synchronous Rectification for Power Converters,” Notice of Allowance, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/848,859, dated Dec. 10, 2015, 29 pages. |
Lam et al., “Automatic Enhanced Self-Driven Synchronous Rectification for Power Converters for Wide Input Range and High Output Voltage Without Tertiary Winding,” U.S. Appl. No. 62/193,755, filed Jul. 17, 2015, 53 pages. |
Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” Office Action dated Dec. 23, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/333,705, 6 pages. |
Lam et al., “Impedance Compensation for Operational Amplifiers Used in Variable Environments,” Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,107, 11 pages. |
Lam et al., “Impedance Compensation for Operational Amplifiers Used in Variable Environments,” Amendment filed May 6, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,107, 12 pages. |
Lam et al., “Impedance Compensation for Operational Amplifiers Used in Variable Environments,” Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 27, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,107, 9 pages. |
Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,116, filed Dec. 9, 2016, 32 pages. |
Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,329, filed Dec. 12, 2016, 32 pages. |
Manfredi et al., “Additive Manufacturing of Al Alloys and Aluminium Matrix Composites (AMCs),” in Monteiro (ed.), Light Metal Alloys Applications, InTech Jun. 11, 2014 32 pages. |
Mappus, “Synchronous Rectification for Forward Converters,” Fairchild Semiconductor Power Seminar 2010-2011, 19 pages. |
Merriam-Webster, “Directly,” retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/directly, on Nov. 6, 2012, 1 page. |
Mitsuya, “Basics of Noise Countermeasures—Lesson 14: Using Common Mode Choke Coils for Power Supply Lines,” Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Oct. 28, 2014, retrieved on Feb. 4, 2015, from http://www.murata.com/en-eu/products/emiconfun/emc/2014/10/28/en-20141028-p1, 3 pages. |
Ng, “Implementing Constant Current Constant Voltage AC Adapter by NCP1200 and NCP4300A,” Application Note, Publication Order No. AND8042/D, Semiconductor Components Industries, Feb. 2001, 12 pages. |
Nguyen et al., “Nulling Input Offset Voltage of Operational Amplifiers,” Mixed Signal Products, Texas Instruments—Application Report SLOA045, Aug. 2000, pp. 1-15. |
Notice for Reasons for Rejections from the Japanese Patent Office with English Translation, dated Apr. 18, 2016, for corresponding Japanese Application No. 2015-531290, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2017 for Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,116, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 20, 2017 for Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,329, 8 pages. |
Ou et al., “Magnetic Feedback Ranks High in Military Converters,” Power Electronics Technology:Jul. 14-19, 2005. |
Parker et al., “Integrated Tri-State Electromagnetic Interference Filter and Line Conditioning Module,” Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/632,818, 11 pages. |
Parker et al., “Transformer-Based Power Converters With 3D Printed Office Microchannel Heat Sink,” Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/627,556, 9 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 16 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Jul. 30, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 18 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 20 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Jan. 16, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 15 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Feb. 15, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 15 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 18 pages. |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Amendment filed Oct. 30, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 19 pages |
Parker, “Switched Capacitor Hold-Up Scheme for Constant Boost Output Voltage,” Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 3, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/751,067, 11 pages. |
Parker, “Transformer-Based Power Converters With 3D Printed Microchannel Heat Sink,” Office Action, dated Aug. 3, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/627,556, 11 pages. |
Pascu, “Error Amplifier with Forced Equilibrium Adaptor,” Kepco, Inc., retrieved from http://www.kepcopower.com/equibm2.htm#fig2, dated May 22, 2014, 8 pages. |
Peter, “Synchronous rectifier in DC/DC converters,” Oct. 5, 2009, retrieved from http://www.posterus.sk/?p=2535, on Jul. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
Plesnik, “A New Method for Driving Synchronous Rectifiers,” IEICE/IEEE INTELEC'03, Oct. 19-23, Yokohama, Japan, pp. 274-281, 2003. |
Shrisavar, “Introduction to Power Management,” Texas Instruments, Biracha Digital Power Ltd., 2014, 37 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Input Control Apparatus and Method With Inrush Current, Under and Over Voltage Handling,” Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,210, 8 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Current Limit/Current Share Operation,” Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2013, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,172, 15 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Current Limit/Current Share Operation,” Amendment filed Mar. 17, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,172, 16 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Method With Compensation for Current Limit/Current Share Operation,” Notice of Allowance dated May 8, 2014, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/185,172, 10 pages. |
Waltman et al., “Power Converter Apparatus and Methods,” U.S. Appl. No. 61/508,937, filed Jul. 18, 2011, 139 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Oct. 14, 2011, for corresponding PCT/US2011/030778, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 20, 2013, for corresponding PCT/US2013/058784, 4 pages. |
Xing et al., “Power System Architecture with Back-Up Power for Servers,” ERC Program of the National Science Foundation, 5 pages. (The year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filing date and any foreign priority date so that the particular month of publication is not in issue.). |
Zhang, “Chapter Two Synchronous Rectification,” Synchronous Rectification, pp. 9-72, PDF created Feb. 20, 1997. |
Advisory Action, dated Aug. 14, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” 3 pages. |
Amendment, filed Dec. 16, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” 10 pages. |
Amendment, filed Jul. 14, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,968, Lam et al., “Dynamic Sharing Average Current Mode Control for Active-Reset and Self-Driven Synchronous Rectification for Power Converters,” 11 pages. |
Amendment, filed Jul. 24, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” 9 pages. |
Amendment, filed Mar. 20, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,116, Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” 3 pages. |
Amendment, filed Mar. 20, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,329, Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” 2 pages. |
Erickson et al., Fundamentals of Power Electronics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York City, New York, USA, 2004, Chapter 12, “Current Programmed Control,” pp. 439-482. (46 pages). |
Final Office Action, dated Apr. 27, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” 10 pages. |
Final Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,968, Lam et al., “Dynamic Sharing Average Current Mode Control for Active-Reset and Self-Driven Synchronous Rectification for Power Converters,” 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 18, 2017, for International Application No. PCT/US2017/035932, 12 pages. |
Lam et al., “Radiation Tolerant, Analog Latch Peak Current Mode Control for Power Converters,” U.S. Appl. No. 15/786,368, filed Oct. 17, 2017, 29 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 28, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/178,968, Lam et al., “Dynamic Sharing Average Current Mode Control for Active-Reset and Self-Driven Synchronous Rectification for Power Converters,” 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 25, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” 5 pages. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 15, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/374,116, Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” 6 pages. |
Office Action, dated Mar. 7, 2017, for U.S. Appl. No. 15/376,329, Lam et al., “Proactively Operational Over-Voltage Protection Circuit,” 6 pages. |
Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2016, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Control Modes in a Unified Servo System,” 9 pages. |
Preliminary Amendment, filed Oct. 28, 2015, for U.S. Appl. No. 14/787,565, Lam et al., “Dynamic Maneuvering Configuration for Multiple Unified Servo System,” 6 pages. |
Rubasinghe, “Use an op amp as a set/reset flip-flop,” EDN:45-46, 2012. |
Texas Instruments, “AN-72 The LM3900: A New Current-Differencing Quad of Plus of Minus Input Amplifiers,” Lit. No. SNOA653, May 2, 2004, 48 pages. |
Voltage Comparator Information and Circuits, Feb. 26, 2015, URL=http://home.cogeco.ca/˜rpaisley4/Comparators.html, download date Jun. 7, 2017, 22 pages. |
West, “Analogue Set-Reset Latch,” Electronics Today International 7(11):76, 1983. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170358979 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15178968 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 15652849 | US |