Portable music players and portable telephones are becoming increasingly common. Owners of these and similar devices often prefer to use them in conjunction with personal sound delivery devices. These devices are worn, for example, while driving (e.g. telephone headset), exercising, traveling, or studying or the like.
Nearly all music players and portable phones have earbuds as a standard accessory, but these one-size-fits-all earbuds often do not stay in the user's ears or become uncomfortable over time.
Proper fitting earbuds or in custom ear monitors can provide the benefit of ambient noise isolation or suppression similarly to how earplugs block sound. However, stock earbuds often do not fit well enough to accomplish this.
In an attempt to address the above described earbud fit problems some companies offer kits of different size earbud adapters. The user selects, through a process of trial and error, the earbud adapter that fits his ear the best. While the probability of a better fit is thus increased, it is still inadequate because the variation in human ear anatomy is too great to be accommodated with a kit that is necessarily limited in its range of shapes and sizes. Furthermore, this approach requires the user to try on each earbud adapter and determine, sometimes over several hours use, if it provides the best fit. Finally, once the optimal earbud adapter is selected, the remaining ones are useless and this results in material waste. Some companies provide a single flexible or compliant earbud adapter where the user is able to adjust its shape and size and/or the material is able to be compressed and then expand to conform to the inner surfaces of the user's ear anatomy. This flexibility or compliance partially addresses the above mentioned problems with kits, but the extent of the flexibility or compliance is necessarily limited to provide optimal results for a small range of anatomy centered on the average ear. When purchasing this product, the user will typically not know in advance whether his ears will fall within the range of the adapter's accommodation which typically creates areas of pressure on known pain points within the ear.
To solve the above mentioned problems other companies supply full custom earbuds or earbud adapters. They do this by first injecting a soft material into the user's ear to form a physical impression or mould. The mould supplies the ear shape information that is then used to manufacture the custom fitted earbud or earbud adapter. While this full custom approach solves many of the problems outlined above, it requires a significant amount of skilled labor which elevates the production cost. Production costs are further increased because the full custom approach necessarily precludes mass production. Additionally, the user must undergo the moulding process which can be uncomfortable, scary and time consuming. And finally, the user must wait several business days while the custom solution is built and shipped. In this model, a custom fit earbud may require skilled labor to eliminate pressure points in areas known to be painful within the ear such as the Crus of Helix, the Tragus, the Anti-Tragus and the Anti-Helix.
For these and other reasons, there is a need for the present invention.
In the following Detailed Description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In this regard, directional terminology, such as “top,” “bottom,” “front,” “back,” “leading,” “trailing,” etc., is used with reference to the orientation of the Figure(s) being described. Because components of embodiments of the present invention can be positioned in a number of different orientations, the directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration and is in no way limiting. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
An earbud herein means a personal sound delivery device that fits substantially within the outer ear and which comprises an acoustic emitter.
An earbud adapter herein means a physical adapter that first, physically and acoustically connects to an earbud and second; physically and acoustically connects to the user's ear. An earbud adapter does not include an acoustic emitter.
An in ear monitor herein means a physical ear adapter that first, physically and acoustically contains an acoustic emitter and second; physically and acoustically connects to the user's ear through a contoured form to fit a single individuals ear. An in ear monitor contains an acoustic emitter that permanently or semi-permanently attaches an acoustic emitter and ear adapter.
An earpiece herein refers generically to devices such as an earbud, and earbud adapter or an in ear monitor.
Embodiments of systems and methods for sizing a user's ear for fitting an earpiece such as earbud adapters or earbuds are disclosed. In general, an ability to size the ear for earbud adapters or earbuds using a 2Dimensional image acquired from an image capture device such as common camera devices including mobile phones, hand held cameras, web cameras, etc. provides several advantages over existing systems and methods. Examples include
1. More accessible: The hand held camera can be used from any location, allowing web based ordering and rapid expansion of providing a custom sized earbud enhancer, with fulfillment systems that can be provided by mail or brick and mortar locations.
2. Lower cost: Three Dimensional (3D) imaging systems that are more expensive to 1-2 orders of magnitude are no longer required to fit individuals for custom sized earbud enhancers.
3. Safer: Some known 3D imaging systems for the ear use lasers or probes that can produce dangerous situations for the user or patient. Probes can create hazards including but not limited to abrasion or perforation. In some states, a licensed audiologist is required to produce an ear impression using a material injected into the ear and then extracted to produce an impression of the ear. This technique contains a risk of leaving material in the ear, perforation and other risks upon extraction.
4. Faster delivery: Once a user has taken the image, the image can be emailed, downloaded or processed on the imaging device (i.e. camera, camera phone etc) to communicate the correct size for the user. The user can then pickup the proper size at the retail location, order by phone or order by electronic communication to be preplaced at a retail location or mailed directly to the consumer.
5. Smaller size: Physics dictate that an angle of incidence required to achieve triangulation for 3D imaging systems is not required using a 2Dimensional imaging system. This means a smaller footprint, including handheld devices.
6. More robust: Many optical systems for 3D imaging do not provide for cameras that are impact resistant (drop from 1 meter or more). When compared to cameras currently available in mass production devices such as mobile phones or hand held cameras, 3D imaging systems are fragile and require special handling to prevent damage.
7. Higher tolerance: Lighting conditions for 3D imaging cameras may require reflective powder, special lighting or contain requirements to avoid fluorescent lighting. 2D imaging techniques do not require special lighting conditions that are different than requirements already placed on digital cameras.
In some disclosed embodiments, an image of the ear is taken using a digital camera device or a digitized photographic image or a video of an ear. In this manner, a dimension or multiple dimensions of the ear can be created that allows an ear prosthetic device such as an earbud adapter or earbud could be sized for the sample ear. During the image acquisition process, the size of the ear is calibrated to a known object such as a ruler, a gauge block, an earbud or any fixed device to calibrate the image such as is illustrated in
Apple earbud 102 is used for calibration. For example, various aspects of the earbud 102 in addition to the earbud itself can be used for calibration, including the diameter of the earbud, holes, arcs, diameter of the wire or wire connection, etc. The posterior edge 104 of the ear bowl, which is critical for determination of size, can be determined by comparing it to known dimensions of the earbud 102. The image acquisition can be provided by using an application on mobile phone, iPods, iTouchs, web cameras or digital cameras, such as illustrated in
An application, such as an iPhone application as illustrated in
New or existing software can be applied toward photo manipulation and sizing. Upon receipt of the file containing the image, it is manually or automatically uploaded into a sizing program. For proper sizing, the dimensions of the reference object are calibrated to determine the scale of the image. In certain embodiments, this is done manually by opening the image in a photo-editing program, i.e. Adobe Photoshop. A predesigned template sizing tool is scaled to match the size of the reference earbud or other calibration device included in the image with the user's ear. Overlaying the template tool on the ear image allows for visual comparison of the edge of the bowl on an individual's ear to earbud size outlines (see
The automated model requires object recognition software that recognizes the white earphone bud and automatically scale the template to size. It also requires edge recognition to determine the best correlation between the posterior bowl edge and the size outlines. Output from this process will correspond to the emailing of the specific size back to the individual with minimal turnover time.
The iPhone app will serve multiple purposes such as brand promotion, market targeting, order collection and processing in addition to the primary sizing function. The sizing component of the software will be constant, but the platform can be adapted to any mobile phone with camera capabilities and SMS or MMS. Website sizing can also be achieved by upload of any digital photo or flash-enabled use of webcam capture. Sizing results can be returned via email or website account.
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a variety of alternate and/or equivalent implementations may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown and described without departing from the scope of the present invention. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the specific embodiments discussed herein. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
This Application is a continuation of PCT/US2010/045773, filed Aug. 17, 2010, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/234,405, filed Aug. 17, 2009, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5592248 | Norton et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603187 | Merrin et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
6053931 | Lizcano | Apr 2000 | A |
6692127 | Abitbol et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
8111864 | Oliveira et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20030074174 | Fu | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040004633 | Perry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040189935 | Warden et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050082370 | Frantz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088435 | Geng | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050238194 | Chornenky | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060204013 | Hannibal et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070036376 | Fried | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070036383 | Romero | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070183603 | Jin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080013794 | Kalker | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090041287 | Quinlisk | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090195678 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100020221 | Tupman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110290005 | Hart | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2435706 | Jun 2001 | CN |
201401994 | Feb 2010 | CN |
20304099 | Jul 2003 | DE |
102005012054 | Sep 2006 | DE |
2002115374 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2003008046 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003184235 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2005064147 | Mar 2005 | JP |
100915679 | Sep 2009 | KR |
9012990 | Nov 1990 | WO |
2009013607 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009120923 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2011014655 | Feb 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Supplemental Search Report, dated Sep. 23, 2013, pp. 5. |
International Search Report, dated Oct. 7, 2010, p. 1. |
PCT International Search Report, PCT/US2011/045773 (dated Jul. 3, 2012), 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120242815 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61234405 | Aug 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2010/045773 | Aug 2010 | US |
Child | 13399058 | US |