The system differs from all previous devices by incorporating at least one directionally controlled nozzle to create a controlled impedance intersection point at the target. This provides a novel feature for precisely controlling the distance at which the effect of the weapon (shock) occurs.
By setting up this condition rapidly and/or by combining multiple media steams, a raster much like the type used to form an old fashioned CRT television image can be used to create invisible electrified fences, walls and or 3D structures like cages.
Another improvement is the possible use of a modulating viscosity of the medium. By using the unique physical properties of some compounds that change their viscosity in a fast and defined way, fluid exit conductivity and breakdown can be controlled. Examples of viscosity modulation can be achieved via thermal, electromagnetic fields or other means. The system is designed to maintain the medium in a thinner (liquid like) state inside the device while making it thicker (gel or solid like) when propelled outside. This partial or total material phase change contributes to extend the continuous laminar jet length (the length without forming droplets) and thus providing an improved conductive medium path for electric current allowing the reach of more distant targets.
The media are typically water ionic gel solutions or very low melting point alloys. It is projected through a small diameter long metal tube that provides laminar flow, slowly coerced and then exited at high velocity. The generated streams join within breakdown voltage at the target and a shock of controllable power can be imparted on the target (subject).
Unlike previous patents (patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,169,065 and 7,676,972B2) the two streams of fluid are not projected in parallel or uncontrolled lines; those patents also never made use of controlled viscosity to provoke quasi or total phase to solid once in the air.
Solutions containing salts or acids are known to be conductive. For example a car battery's electrolyte is highly conductive. In this invention, we use this same basic liquid conductivity principle, but at a much lower and thus safer concentration. Unlike a car battery, the preferred embodiment uses higher voltages and a fluid medium that is only temporarily projected.
The acceptance of electric weapons by law enforcement is well established in many countries because it is an effective and a non-lethal means for control and neutralization of a threat. It is simple to use, causes virtually no collateral damage, and is relatively accurate. Despite obvious advantages some aspects of existing systems are operationally challenging. In current embodiments reloading is not possible or practical without full service (based on projected wire conductor and springs). Furthermore its use is more constraining in crowded areas given wire deployment along in a linear path (like a bullet's trajectory).
The invention overcomes these drawbacks by providing multiple shots, enables the capability of multiple or continuous reloading (through refueling of physical medium fluid/solution) and can target only in a controlled spatial volume (though jet convergence). This opens new possibilities for standalone operation (surveillance and active defense devices) and drone mounting (low recoil).
Other objects, advantages and features will become more apparent upon reading the following non-restrictive description of embodiments thereof, given for the purpose of exemplification only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The table below presents reference numbers used in at least some of the above-mentioned Figures, with the corresponding component of the electric projection weapon system:
The unit can be mounted in a gun like structure as depicted in
Computerized Raster Electro Wall Application
Multiple units can be assembled in a matrix or fire in a time shared coverage, rendering the effect of an invisible wall. Such an invisible wall or perimeter may be set and can prevent person(s) or animal(s) from penetrating or leaving a quartered off area. This may be used to fence animals or persons from access to an area or passageway.
The thickness of the said raster wall can be altered by creating high speed rastered points in front of one another rendering the perception and sensation of a controlled thickness.
A collection of range measuring sensors as well as cameras may be used to determine target positions. Multiple units can be synchronized together to dispatch proper target coverage and increase wall coverage resolution.
Such units may be mounted on gimbals or pan & scan mechanism to cover larger areas. Alternately beams may be deflected electrically or magnetically.
Portable Variant
Referring to
Drone Mounted Variant
Referring to
Wall Mounted Surveillance System Variant
Referring to
Explosive or Incendiary Detonated or Ignited at Controlled Distance and Shield Variant
An advanced use of this invention may provide new application fields by using large amount of power (lot more than what is required for human shocking) and using a timely sequenced fired electric bolts at high speed, a moving object can be slowed down or stopped by the action of the electric arcing shockwave result of the focal point A series of lightning bolts of high energy in front of a bullet or missile could destroy it, slow it down enough to significantly reduce damage, create a local shield or induce a trajectory change.
Additionally the device may be fitted with a third nozzle that carries an ignitable or explosive material stream which will be ignited by the electrical spark at the target. The ignitable fluid projection may be stopped and with a computed delay before applying the high voltage generator to the conductive fluid in order to make impossible a back firing. The advantages of using the ignitable material is to increase heat damage of the target; multiple shots; and an easy means of reloading a unit (can be made at ground level).
Extended Possible Mechanisms
Gel like medium solution can be made from a combination of ionic solutions and a gelatinous substance:
Hereinbelow is a list of some possible conductive solution and metallic conductive powder
Conductive Molecule
(Electrical conductivity in mS/cm at 0.5% mass concentration and 0% gelatinous substance)
The following metallic powders enhance conductivity when in suspension
Listed below are possible variable viscosity substance
Gas Generation Details
Listed below are some possible chemical reaction for pressurized gas generation
The computed angle can be worked out to the difference between 90 degrees and the inverse tangent of the ratio of distance between the 2 beams and target distance. The dielectric breakdown component can be accounted for by projecting the breakdown distance with the same angular ration and subtracting that from the distance.
Then we note that the practical measured distance to the target is actually 1 and not D where 1=D−Δ.
We also know that Δ/δ=D/d, thus
From the above equation θ can be discovered numerically by iteration plugging θo. As a first approximation. 3 or 4 polynomial McLaurin approximations can be worked out for trigonometric estimation that are accurate enough for precise angle stepping. As distance increase is becomes more important to improve finesse in step control of the jet defecting mechanism.
The depth of the firing is computed based on the position of the target such that a arching distance occurs on the target in this case breakdown is computed from the ratio of D/d
Magnetic arc Propulsion Mechanisms
Consider the following setup of a classic rolling bar experiment in physics. In this paradigm however, the rolling bar is replaced with an electric arc. This arc may be further seeded with ionic solutions, solids or gases creating a plasma.
Referring to
As current flows in the corona arc, the generated plasma will be subject to the Lorentz force as described below and the electrons or plasma are propelled according to the Lorentz force equations which is:
Which can be expressed in terms of the plasma current and arc path length as:
Where Ip is the plasma current, L is the current path length vector and B would be the magnetic field vector produced by an electromagnet. In such a case then, from Ampere's law the magnetic field of the electromagnet can be worked out to be:
Where IM is the current through the electomagent plugging back then we have:
Where Ip is:
For computing the current special case we are interested in, is based on the empirical observations known as Lenz's law (Heinrick Lenz 1834). This is a special case of Faraday′s equation, Lenz's states that:
By substituting in the above we have that
By rearranging the terms and expressing acceleration and velocity in terms of displacement it is possible to show that:
Which is a second order homogeneous differential equation. The systems can then be tune for overdamped, damped or underdamped response. Note that ionic collision dynamics should be used to further refine this model. As an approximation very large accelerations can be present. The system is in essence an MHD plasma propulsion in which the plasma also carries (charge) electricity
By modulating the magnetic field in the above setup; it would be possible to project an ionic stream in the forward direction. This stream can then either deflect the current path L through the air or be utilized in pairs of ionized plasma channels that then provide a low impedance path for electric arcing. Ionic columns can be formed in this way and then paired can be used to join at a target point and serve as a path for yet another high voltage supply electrifying the so defined path.
Experiments and Prototypes
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2 921 708 | Feb 2016 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1497244 | Mattox | Jun 1924 | A |
2331388 | Graham | Oct 1943 | A |
2586256 | Quarles | Feb 1952 | A |
2851094 | Griffin | Sep 1958 | A |
3374708 | Wall | Mar 1968 | A |
3803463 | Cover | Apr 1974 | A |
3971292 | Paniagua | Jul 1976 | A |
4022350 | Amron | May 1977 | A |
4034497 | Yanda | Jul 1977 | A |
4154375 | Bippus | May 1979 | A |
4443906 | Tucker et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4492318 | Luk | Jan 1985 | A |
4518118 | Takata | May 1985 | A |
4615488 | Sands | Oct 1986 | A |
4684062 | Bagwell | Aug 1987 | A |
4691264 | Schaffhauser et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4704942 | Barditch | Nov 1987 | A |
4706848 | D'Andrade | Nov 1987 | A |
4735239 | Salmon et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4765510 | Rende | Aug 1988 | A |
4846044 | Lahr | Jul 1989 | A |
4852454 | Batchelder | Aug 1989 | A |
4930392 | Wilson | Jun 1990 | A |
5054959 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5103366 | Battochi | Apr 1992 | A |
5169065 | Bloch | Dec 1992 | A |
5225623 | Krasnow | Jul 1993 | A |
5409638 | Battochi | Apr 1995 | A |
5625525 | Coakley et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5675103 | Herr | Oct 1997 | A |
5779099 | D'Andrade | Jul 1998 | A |
6151824 | Clayton | Nov 2000 | A |
6431044 | Poole | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6771186 | Boveja | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7675731 | Bitar | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7676972 | Smith | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20030151880 | Lee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20090183413 | Smith et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090237857 | Kao | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20160265868 | Forsythe | Sep 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2233326 | Apr 1997 | CA |
2048953 | Dec 1989 | CN |
2053322 | Feb 1990 | CN |
2053323 | Feb 1990 | CN |
1040431 | Mar 1990 | CN |
2081521 | Jul 1991 | CN |
1053674 | Aug 1991 | CN |
2082390 | Aug 1991 | CN |
2098665 | Mar 1992 | CN |
2108889 | Jul 1992 | CN |
2135137 | Jun 1993 | CN |
2147505 | Nov 1993 | CN |
1080393 | Jan 1994 | CN |
2177220 | Sep 1994 | CN |
2498575 | Jul 2002 | CN |
2684135 | Mar 2005 | CN |
2694217 | Apr 2005 | CN |
2807185 | Aug 2006 | CN |
101082473 | Dec 2007 | CN |
201355222 | Dec 2009 | CN |
202501799 | Oct 2012 | CN |
2654498 | Jun 1978 | DE |
3917167 | Nov 1990 | DE |
19824541 | Aug 1999 | DE |
19824541 | Aug 1999 | DE |
0010561 | May 1980 | EP |
0326268 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0198728 | Nov 1989 | EP |
0441610 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0303198 | Oct 1991 | EP |
1901025 | Mar 2008 | EP |
9712194 | Apr 1997 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180187999 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |